pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.23346 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-25 · ❄️ cond-mat.stat-mech · cond-mat.dis-nn· cond-mat.str-el· physics.data-an· quant-ph

Recognition: unknown

Bayesian phase transition for the critical Ising model: Enlarged replica symmetry in the epsilon expansion and in 2D

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 06:56 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.stat-mech cond-mat.dis-nncond-mat.str-elphysics.data-anquant-ph
keywords Ising modelreplica symmetrymeasurement-induced transitionEdwards-Anderson correlatorepsilon expansionBayesian phase transitioncritical phenomenaNishimori point
0
0 comments X

The pith

Measuring bond energies in the critical Ising model triggers a phase transition where enlarged replica symmetry fixes the Edwards-Anderson exponent exactly.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that imaging or measuring bond energies in the critical Ising model can enter a strong-measurement phase whose properties depend on measurement precision. Using replica field theory in an epsilon expansion around six dimensions together with two-dimensional simulations, it identifies multiscaling at the transition point and an enlarged replica symmetry that is either built into certain protocols or emerges in the infrared. This symmetry is an analog of the Nishimori point but in a different replica limit, and it determines the precise scaling of the Edwards-Anderson correlator both in two dimensions and near the upper critical dimension. A reader would care because the result links measurement-induced transitions to universal replica constraints that appear in disordered systems and quantum information contexts.

Core claim

A process that measures bond energies in the critical Ising model undergoes a Bayesian phase transition into a strong-measurement regime. In replica field theory this regime is characterized by an enlarged replica symmetry, present microscopically for some protocols and generically emerging in the infrared for others. The symmetry fixes the exact value of the Edwards-Anderson correlator exponent both in two dimensions and in the epsilon expansion around six dimensions, and it produces multiscaling of correlation functions at criticality. The same enlarged symmetry is analyzed for power-law interactions and long-range measurements.

What carries the argument

Enlarged replica symmetry in the replica field theory of the measurement process, an analog of the Nishimori phenomenon in a distinct replica limit, which constrains scaling dimensions and fixes the Edwards-Anderson exponent.

Load-bearing premise

The replica field theory description remains valid for the bond-energy measurement process and the enlarged symmetry emerges in the infrared even when it is not microscopically present for every protocol.

What would settle it

A two-dimensional Monte Carlo simulation of the measurement process that yields an Edwards-Anderson correlator exponent different from the exact value predicted by the enlarged symmetry would falsify the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.23346 by Adam Nahum, Alapan Das, Kay Joerg Wiese.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Schematic illustration of part of a critical Ising configura view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: is intended to give a heuristic idea of this pro￾cess. The top-left panel shows the measured configuration S1 = S ref. The top-right panel shows a realization of Gaus￾sian measurements M taken from this configuration. The bottom-left panel shows a configuration S2 sampled from the conditioned ensemble P(•|M). Finally, the bottom-right panel shows the correlations, conditioned on measurements, between the s… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Topology of the phase diagram for the field theory in view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Flow at 2-loop order for n = 1, ϵ = 1. Compared to view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Top: Modified Binder cumulant for the Gaussian measure view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Log-log plot of the first six moments of the correlator and view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The quantity R shown for Top: Gaussian measurement, Middle: Binary measurement and Bottom: Gaussian measurement in the checkerboard lattice. The error bars are smaller than the markers. The horizontal dashed line in the first two figures indicates R = 1. between the critical point discussed here and the multifrac￾tal phase that exists for Γ < Γc in dimensions just above two (Eq. 9).33 33 That multifractal … view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Regions of the (αJ /d, αM/d) plane are labelled according to which cubic terms are relevant. The region that touches the origin is the “mean-field” region where all interactions are irrelevant. In the shaded region a quartic operator becomes relevant (see Sec. IV), in￾validating the naive ϵ expansion (unless its coupling is tuned away). The dashed line indicates αM = αJ , in which case there is the pos￾sib… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The range where ϵ(α, d) > 0 (in yellow) and two possible expansion paths to reach α = d = 1. transforming Jij and Γij , Sn = 1 2 X α Z k |k| αJ ϕα(k)ϕα(−k) (119) + 1 4 X αβ Z k |k| αM Φαβ(k)Φαβ(−k) + interaction terms. with αJ,M = σJ,M − d. We restrict to the range 0 < αJ , αM < 2, (120) since if a given α is greater than 2 the corresponding |k| α term is subleading compared to the usual local derivative … view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: The coordinates of the fixed point for 0 < ϵ1/ϵ2 < 1/3, when it is visible at one-loop order. λ1 of ϕϕΦ to zero. As a result, ϕ and Φ fields decouple, and the ϕ field becomes a long-range free field. The Φ field, on the other hand, is governed by a fixed point that is equivalent to that for long-range measurements of an infinite temperature Ising model! (This fixed point is equivalent to the Nishimori fix… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: The NPRG eigenvalues (left) and couplings (right) in the LPA’ scheme with all operators with up to four fields (9 couplings). view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: This shows the variation of exponents obtained by fitting view at source ↗
read the original abstract

A process that images or measures bond energies in the critical Ising model can be in distinct measurement ``phases'', depending on the precision of measurement. We study the transition into the strong-measurement phase using replica field theory (an epsilon expansion around six dimensions) and numerical simulations in two dimensions. The results reveal multiscaling of correlation functions at the critical point, and a striking enlarged symmetry of the replica description. This is an analog of the Nishimori phenomenon in the Ising spin glass, in a distinct replica limit. The enlarged symmetry is present microscopically for certain measurement protocols, but more generally can emerge in the infrared, and it fixes the exact value of the exponent for the Edwards-Anderson correlator both in 2D and near the upper critical dimension. We also examine the epsilon expansion for models with power-law interactions and/or long-range measurement.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper studies the Bayesian phase transition arising from measuring bond energies in the critical Ising model, identifying weak and strong measurement phases. Through replica field theory, an epsilon expansion is performed around six dimensions, complemented by Monte Carlo simulations in two dimensions. The analysis uncovers multiscaling in correlation functions at criticality and an enlarged replica symmetry, analogous to the Nishimori line in spin glasses but in a different replica limit. This symmetry, which may be present microscopically or emerge under renormalization group flow, exactly determines the exponent of the Edwards-Anderson correlator. Extensions to long-range interactions are also considered.

Significance. This work is significant as it bridges concepts from measurement-induced phase transitions, Bayesian inference, and replica symmetry in disordered systems. The ability to fix an exact exponent via symmetry without parameters is a notable strength, supported by consistency between the analytic epsilon expansion and 2D numerical results. The explicit mapping from measurement protocols to the replicated action and the derivation of beta functions provide a solid foundation. If the replica description accurately captures the measurement process, this could influence future studies on information extraction in critical systems and generalizations to other models.

major comments (1)
  1. The section deriving the beta functions and fixed-point structure: the emergence of the enlarged symmetry under RG flow for general protocols (as opposed to microscopic presence) is central to the exact exponent claim, but the stability analysis and flow to the symmetric fixed point in the replica limit should be shown explicitly to confirm it is attractive and fixes the Edwards-Anderson exponent without additional assumptions.
minor comments (3)
  1. The abstract and introduction should specify the replica limit (e.g., n to 0 or other) in which the enlarged symmetry appears, to clarify the analogy to the Nishimori line.
  2. In the numerical section, include system sizes, number of samples, and error estimates for the 2D Monte Carlo data on multiscaling and the Edwards-Anderson exponent to facilitate direct comparison with the analytic prediction.
  3. Clarify the definition of 'measurement phases' and the Edwards-Anderson correlator at first use, including any relevant equations, for readers unfamiliar with the Bayesian measurement setup.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of our work and for the recommendation of minor revision. We address the single major comment below and will incorporate the requested clarification in the revised manuscript.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: The section deriving the beta functions and fixed-point structure: the emergence of the enlarged symmetry under RG flow for general protocols (as opposed to microscopic presence) is central to the exact exponent claim, but the stability analysis and flow to the symmetric fixed point in the replica limit should be shown explicitly to confirm it is attractive and fixes the Edwards-Anderson exponent without additional assumptions.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit demonstration of the RG flow in the replica limit would strengthen the central claim that the enlarged symmetry emerges under renormalization for general measurement protocols. In the current manuscript the beta functions are derived for finite replica number n and the fixed-point structure is analyzed in the epsilon expansion; the infrared attractiveness of the symmetric fixed point is inferred from the eigenvalue spectrum at the fixed point. However, we did not display the explicit flow trajectories or the stability matrix projected onto the replica limit relevant to the Edwards-Anderson correlator. In the revised version we will add a dedicated paragraph (and, if space permits, a supplementary figure) that (i) specializes the beta functions to the appropriate replica limit, (ii) computes the stability eigenvalues around the symmetric fixed point, and (iii) shows that all relevant perturbations are irrelevant, thereby confirming that the fixed point is attractive and fixes the exponent independently of microscopic details. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation self-contained

full rationale

The paper maps specific measurement protocols onto a replicated field theory, performs an epsilon expansion around six dimensions to obtain beta functions, and demonstrates that an enlarged replica symmetry (microscopic for some protocols, emergent under RG for others) constrains the Edwards-Anderson exponent exactly. This constraint is a direct algebraic consequence of the symmetry in the replica limit rather than a fit to the exponent itself. Two-dimensional Monte Carlo results are used only for consistency checks, not as input to the analytic prediction. No step equates a derived quantity to its own fitted input or reduces to a self-citation chain; the central claim remains independent of the target exponent.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

Review based on abstract only; standard assumptions of replica field theory and perturbative expansion are invoked without explicit listing of free parameters or new entities beyond the measurement phases themselves.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Replica trick applies to the measurement process in the critical Ising model
    Central to the replica field theory used to study the transition into the strong-measurement phase.
invented entities (1)
  • measurement phases no independent evidence
    purpose: Distinct regimes of the system depending on the precision of bond energy measurements
    Introduced as the primary phenomenon under study, with transition into the strong-measurement phase analyzed.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5472 in / 1278 out tokens · 33552 ms · 2026-05-08T06:56:27.158133+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

91 extracted references · 13 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    paramagnet measure- ment transition

    for further discussion). Here the beta function forλ WF is independent of the cubic couplings and is just the usual Wilson-Fisher beta function for the Ising model. Therefore the (stable) fixed-point value ofλ WF becomes nonzero below 22 A Landau theory for the quantum measurement phase transition gives an example where the RG flows run to strong coupling...

  2. [2]

    Correction-to-scaling exponentsω To assess the stability of the fixed point in the(λ 1, λ2) plane, we setλ i =λ ∗ +δλ i. Theβ-function becomes βi(λ1, λ2) =β i(λ∗, λ∗)− X j Ωijδλj +O(δλ 2),(69) with the stability matrix Ωij :=− ∂ ∂λj βi(λ1, λ2).(70) Its eigenvaluesω i read, for generaln, ω1 =− ϵ 2 − 3 2 λ2(n−1)− 5 36 λ4 5n2+98n−175 +...(71) ω2 =− ϵ 2 − 1 6...

  3. [3]

    Anomalous field dimensionsη Each of the two fieldsϕandΦrenormalizes, and for general naquires an anomalous dimensionη. The RG functions are η1(λ1, λ2) = λ2 1 3 (n−1)− λ2 1(n−1) 108 × h λ2 1(11n−24)−24λ2λ1(n−2) + 11λ2 2(n−2) i +...(75) η2(λ1, λ2) = λ2 1 3 + λ2 2 3 (n−2) + 1 54 h λ4 1(23−11n) +24λ2λ3 1(n−2)−11λ 2 2λ2 1(n−2) +λ 4 2(n−2)2 i +...(76) At the is...

  4. [4]

    IV C 1 we considered moving away from the fixed point by changingλ i →λ ∗ +δλ i

    Mass insertions:ν In Sec. IV C 1 we considered moving away from the fixed point by changingλ i →λ ∗ +δλ i. Now we consider pertur- bating by a (squared) massr 1 forϕorr 2 forΦ. (The inter- pretation of the masses in terms of microscopic couplings was given in Eq. 35). The squared massesr 1 andr 2 mix under RG. To leading order one has to evaluate Mij(λ1, ...

  5. [5]

    effective

    Multifractal exponents∆ l In Sec. IV B we noted that the multiscaling exponents∆ l were the scaling dimensions of the operators O1 =ϕ 1,O 2 = Φ12,(91) O3 =ϕ 1Φ23 +. . . ,O 4 = Φ12Φ34 +. . . ,(92) where the ellipses represent symmetrization over the possible index orderings. These operators are continuum avatars of the lattice operatorsO latt l =S 1S2 · · ...

  6. [6]

    All diagrams are calculated with momentump= 1entering into the external legs

    Summary of the RG procedure We use dimensional regularization and minimal subtraction in a massless scheme [73–75]. All diagrams are calculated with momentump= 1entering into the external legs. They are normalized s.t. ≡ 1 ϵ , ϵ= 6−d,(A1) where the momentum enters and exits at two distinct vertices. To streamline the calculations, we evaluate diagrams und...

  7. [7]

    R′ = 1 ϵ (A3) R′ = − =− 1 2ϵ2 + 1 8ϵ (A4) Remark that under the originalRoperation the leading di- vergence1/(2ϵ 2)is canceled

    Diagrams for the SR calculation Vertex renormalization. R′ = 1 ϵ (A3) R′ = − =− 1 2ϵ2 + 1 8ϵ (A4) Remark that under the originalRoperation the leading di- vergence1/(2ϵ 2)is canceled. The combination written here, with its momentum dependence reads R′ = 1 2ϵ2 + 1 8ϵ p−2ϵ − 1 ϵ2 p −ϵ (A5) The second term has a differentp-dependence, since the 1- loop count...

  8. [8]

    −δS(1) m2 = 1 2 m2 + 1 4 m2 + 1 4 m2 +O(λ 6) m2 (A17) The corresponding diagrams are given in Eqs

    Graphical representation of 2-loop corrections The corrections to the 3-point function are δS(3) = 1 3! + 1 2 + 1 4 + 1 12 +O(λ 7)(A15) Corrections to the quadratic part of the action read −δS(1) p2 = 1 2 p2 + 1 4 p2 + 1 4 p2 +O(λ 6)(A16) A similar expression holds for the correction to the mass. −δS(1) m2 = 1 2 m2 + 1 4 m2 + 1 4 m2 +O(λ 6) m2 (A17) The c...

  9. [9]

    The first line is fornuncoupled copies of Lee-Yang, with which we checked our calculations

    Group-theory factors One-loop order.We consider the corrections toλ 1 andλ 2. The first line is fornuncoupled copies of Lee-Yang, with which we checked our calculations. G( |Φ3 a) =λ 3 0 (A18) G( |ΦαΦβΦαβ) = 3 λ3 1 +λ 2λ2 1(n−2) (A19) G( |ΦαβΦβγΦαγ) =λ 3 1 +λ 3 2(n−2).(A20) For the wave-function renormalization, we have G( |(∇Φα)2) = 1 2 λ2 0 (A21) G( |(∇...

  10. [10]

    (A15) and to the 2-point vertex in Eq

    RG functions and critical exponents Theβ-functions.To obtain theβ-functions, one needs to evaluate the corrections for the 3-point vertex in Eq. (A15) and to the 2-point vertex in Eq. (A16). The corrections to the couplingsλ i and critical exponentsη i are obtained via δλ1 := 2(δS(3)|ΦαΦβΦαβ)(A39) δλ2 := 6(δS(3)|ΦαβΦβγΦαγ)(A40) δη1 := 2(δS(1)|(∇Φα)2)(A41)...

  11. [11]

    even” quantities (invariant under global spin flip of a single replica) is much smaller than that of the “odd

    Diagrams for LR calculation D1 = = Γ(α)Γ(ϵ)Γ( α 2 −ϵ)Γ( 3α 2 −ϵ) ϵ2Γ ϵ 2 Γ( α−ϵ 2 )Γ( 3(α−ϵ) 2 )Γ(α+ ϵ 2) = 1 2ϵ2 + ψ 3α 2 −ψ(α)−ψ α 2 −γ E 4ϵ +...(B1) 26 R′D1 =R ′ = + =− 1 2ϵ2 + ψ( 3α 2 )−ψ(α)−ψ( α 2 )−γ E 4ϵ +...(B2) D5 = =− 3 2α−2Γ(α)Γ( ϵ+1 2 )Γ( 1 2(α−ϵ+ 1))Γ( 3α 2 −ϵ) 2 ϵ2 sin( π 2 (α−ϵ))Γ( ϵ 2)Γ( 3α 2 − 3ϵ 2 + 1)Γ(α−ϵ 2 )Γ(2α−ϵ)Γ( α+ϵ 2 ) = Γ(− α 2...

  12. [12]

    Kardar,Statistical Physics of Fields(Cambridge University Press, 2007)

    M. Kardar,Statistical Physics of Fields(Cambridge University Press, 2007)

  13. [13]

    Giuseppe Mussardo,Statistical field theory: an introduction to exactly solved models in statistical physics(Oxford University Press, 2010)

  14. [14]

    Bayesian critical points in classical lattice models,

    A. Nahum and J.L. Jacobsen, “Bayesian critical points in classical lattice models,” Phys. Rev. B112, 235113 (2025), arXiv:2504.01264

  15. [15]

    Learning transitions in classical Ising models and deformed toric codes

    M. P ¨utz, S. J. Garratt, H. Nishimori, S. Trebst, and G.-Y . Zhu, “Learning transitions in classical Ising models and deformed toric codes,” (2025), arXiv:2504.12385 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

  16. [16]

    The Nishimori line and Bayesian statistics,

    Y . Iba, “The Nishimori line and Bayesian statistics,” J. Phys. A 32, 3875 (1999)

  17. [17]

    Statistical physics of inference: Thresholds and algorithms,

    Lenka Zdeborov ´a and Florent Krzakala, “Statistical physics of inference: Thresholds and algorithms,” Advances in Physics65, 453–552 (2016)

  18. [18]

    Nishimori,Statistical physics of spin glasses and informa- tion processing: an introduction, 111 (Clarendon Press, 2001)

    H. Nishimori,Statistical physics of spin glasses and informa- tion processing: an introduction, 111 (Clarendon Press, 2001)

  19. [19]

    Typology of phase transitions in bayesian inference problems,

    Federico Ricci-Tersenghi, Guilhem Semerjian, and Lenka Zde- borov´a, “Typology of phase transitions in bayesian inference problems,” Physical Review E99, 042109 (2019)

  20. [20]

    Disordered systems insights on computational hardness,

    David Gamarnik, Cristopher Moore, and Lenka Zdeborov ´a, “Disordered systems insights on computational hardness,” Jour- nal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2022, 114015 (2022)

  21. [21]

    Group synchronization on grids,

    Emmanuel Abbe, Laurent Massoulie, Andrea Montanari, Allan Sly, and Nikhil Srivastava, “Group synchronization on grids,” Mathematical Statistics and Learning1, 227–256 (2018)

  22. [22]

    Statisti- cal reconstruction of the gaussian free field and kt transition,

    Christophe Garban and Avelio Sep ´ulveda, “Statisti- cal reconstruction of the gaussian free field and kt transition,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2002.12284 (2020), https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2002.12284

  23. [23]

    Monitored fluctuating hydrodynamics,

    Sarang Gopalakrishnan, Ewan McCulloch, and Romain Vasseur, “Monitored fluctuating hydrodynamics,” Physical Re- view X16, 011024 (2026)

  24. [24]

    Ideal glass transitions by random pinning,

    Chiara Cammarota and Giulio Biroli, “Ideal glass transitions by random pinning,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences109, 8850–8855 (2012)

  25. [25]

    The theory of rub- ber elasticity,

    RT Deam and Samuel Frederick Edwards, “The theory of rub- ber elasticity,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences280, 317–353 (1976)

  26. [26]

    Sam edwards and the statistical mechanics of rubber,

    Paul M Goldbart and Nigel Goldenfeld, “Sam edwards and the statistical mechanics of rubber,” inStealing the Gold: A cele- bration of the pioneering physics of Sam Edwards(Oxford Uni- versity Press, 2004) pp. 275–300

  27. [27]

    Topological quantum memory,

    Eric Dennis, Alexei Kitaev, Andrew Landahl, and John Preskill, “Topological quantum memory,” Journal of Mathemat- ical Physics43, 4452–4505 (2002)

  28. [28]

    Confinement-higgs transition in a disordered gauge theory and the accuracy threshold for quantum memory,

    Chenyang Wang, Jim Harrington, and John Preskill, “Confinement-higgs transition in a disordered gauge theory and the accuracy threshold for quantum memory,” Annals of Physics303, 31–58 (2003)

  29. [29]

    Kardar-parisi-zhang physics and phase transition in a classical single random walker under con- tinuous measurement,

    Tony Jin and David G Martin, “Kardar-parisi-zhang physics and phase transition in a classical single random walker under con- tinuous measurement,” Physical Review Letters129, 260603 (2022)

  30. [30]

    Planted directed poly- mer: Inferring a random walk from noisy images,

    Sun Woo P. Kim and Austen Lamacraft, “Planted directed poly- mer: Inferring a random walk from noisy images,” Physical Re- view E111, 024135 (2025)

  31. [31]

    Measurement-induced phase transition in state estimation of chaotic systems and the directed polymer,

    Federico Gerbino, Guido Giachetti, Pierre Le Doussal, and An- drea De Luca, “Measurement-induced phase transition in state estimation of chaotic systems and the directed polymer,” Phys- ical Review Research7, 033105 (2025)

  32. [32]

    Entanglement and charge-sharpening transi- tions in u (1) symmetric monitored quantum circuits,

    Utkarsh Agrawal, Aidan Zabalo, Kun Chen, Justin H Wil- son, Andrew C Potter, JH Pixley, Sarang Gopalakrishnan, and Romain Vasseur, “Entanglement and charge-sharpening transi- tions in u (1) symmetric monitored quantum circuits,” Physical Review X12, 041002 (2022)

  33. [33]

    Measurement-induced phase transitions in quantum inference problems and quantum hidden markov models,

    Sun Woo P Kim, Curt von Keyserlingk, and Austen Lamacraft, “Measurement-induced phase transitions in quantum inference problems and quantum hidden markov models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.08888 (2025), https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2504.08888

  34. [34]

    Rushikesh A Patil and Andreas WW Ludwig, “Shan- non entropy of the measurement record at measurement- 30 dominated criticality and rg flow: A c-theorem for effec- tive central charge and a g-theorem for effective bound- ary entropy,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.07959 (2025), https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2507.07959

  35. [35]

    Exact results and critical properties of the ising model with competing interactions,

    Hidetoshi Nishimori, “Exact results and critical properties of the ising model with competing interactions,” Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics13, 4071–4076 (1980)

  36. [36]

    Location of the Ising spin- glass multicritical point on Nishimori’s line,

    P. Le Doussal and A.B. Harris, “Location of the Ising spin- glass multicritical point on Nishimori’s line,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 625–628 (1988)

  37. [37]

    ϵexpansion for the Nishimori multicritical point of spin glasses,

    P. Le Doussal and A.B. Harris, “ϵexpansion for the Nishimori multicritical point of spin glasses,” Phys. Rev. B40, 9249–9252 (1989)

  38. [38]

    Mean field andϵ-expansion study of spin glasses,

    J.-H Chen and T.C. Lubensky, “Mean field andϵ-expansion study of spin glasses,” Phys. Rev. B16, 2106–2114 (1977)

  39. [39]

    Random-bond Ising model in two dimensions: The Nishimori line and super- symmetry,

    I.A. Gruzberg, N. Read, and A.W.W. Ludwig, “Random-bond Ising model in two dimensions: The Nishimori line and super- symmetry,” Phys. Rev. B63, 104422 (2001)

  40. [40]

    Field the- ory for ising spin glasses and the measurement transition at 5- loop order,

    D.A. Davletbaeva, M. Kompaniets, and K.J. Wiese, “Field the- ory for ising spin glasses and the measurement transition at 5- loop order,” in preparation (2026)

  41. [41]

    Multiscaling in the 3d critical site- diluted ising ferromagnet,

    E Marinari, V ´ıctor Martin-Mayor, G Parisi, F Ricci-Tersenghi, and JJ Ruiz-Lorenzo, “Multiscaling in the 3d critical site- diluted ising ferromagnet,” Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2024, 013301 (2024)

  42. [42]

    Statistical physics of inference: Thresholds and algorithms,

    L. Zdeborov ´a and F. Krzakala, “Statistical physics of inference: Thresholds and algorithms,” Adv. Phys.65, 453–552 (2016)

  43. [43]

    Infinite hierarchies of exponents in a diluted ferromagnet and their interpretation,

    A.W.W. Ludwig, “Infinite hierarchies of exponents in a diluted ferromagnet and their interpretation,” Nucl. Phys. B330, 639– 680 (1990)

  44. [44]

    Higher moments of spin-spin correlation func- tions for the ferromagnetic random bond Potts model,

    M.-A. Lewis, “Higher moments of spin-spin correlation func- tions for the ferromagnetic random bond Potts model,” Euro- phys. Lett.43, 189–194 (1998)

  45. [45]

    Monte Carlo study of the critical behavior of random bond Potts models,

    T. Olson and A.P. Young, “Monte Carlo study of the critical behavior of random bond Potts models,” Phys. Rev. B60, 3428 (1999)

  46. [46]

    Correlated correlation functions in random-bond ferromagnets,

    T. Davis and J. Cardy, “Correlated correlation functions in random-bond ferromagnets,” Nucl. Phys. B570, 713–725 (2000)

  47. [47]

    Boundary critical behaviour of two-dimensional random Potts models,

    G. Pal ´agyi, C. Chatelain, B. Berche, and F. Igl ´oi, “Boundary critical behaviour of two-dimensional random Potts models,” Eur. Phys. J. B13, 357–367 (2000)

  48. [48]

    Universality class of the Nishimori point in the 2D±J random-bond Ising model,

    A. Honecker, M. Picco, and P. Pujol, “Universality class of the Nishimori point in the 2D±J random-bond Ising model,” Phys. Rev. Lett.87, 047201 (2001)

  49. [49]

    Correlation-function distributions at the nishimori point of two-dimensional ising spin glasses,

    SLA De Queiroz and RB Stinchcombe, “Correlation-function distributions at the nishimori point of two-dimensional ising spin glasses,” Physical Review B68, 144414 (2003)

  50. [50]

    Negative scaling dimensions and conformal invariance at the nishimori point in the±j random- bond ising model,

    F. Merz and J.T. Chalker, “Negative scaling dimensions and conformal invariance at the nishimori point in the±j random- bond ising model,” Phys. Rev. B66, 054413 (2002)

  51. [51]

    Strong disorder fixed points in the two-dimensional random-bond Ising model,

    M. Picco, A. Honecker, and P. Pujol, “Strong disorder fixed points in the two-dimensional random-bond Ising model,” J. Stat. Mech. Theory Exp.2006, P09006 (2006)

  52. [52]

    Symmetry relations for multifractal spectra at random critical points,

    C. Monthus, B. Berche, and C. Chatelain, “Symmetry relations for multifractal spectra at random critical points,” J. Stat. Mech. 2009, P12002 (2009)

  53. [53]

    Multiscaling in the 3d critical site- diluted ising ferromagnet,

    E. Marinari, V . Martin-Mayor, G. Parisi, F. Ricci-Tersenghi, and J.J. Ruiz-Lorenzo, “Multiscaling in the 3d critical site- diluted ising ferromagnet,” J. Stat. Mech. Theory Exp.2024, 013301 (2024)

  54. [54]

    Multifractal wavefunction at the localization threshold,

    C. Castellani, “Multifractal wavefunction at the localization threshold,” inFluctuations and Stochastic Phenomena in Con- densed Matter: Proceedings of the Sitges Conference on Sta- tistical Mechanics, Sitges, Barcelona, Spain, May 26–30, 1986 (Springer, 2005) pp. 315–332

  55. [55]

    Higher conformal multifractality,

    B. Duplantier, “Higher conformal multifractality,” J. Stat. Phys. 110, 691–738 (2003)

  56. [56]

    Structural glass transition and the entropy of the metastable states,

    R. Monasson, “Structural glass transition and the entropy of the metastable states,” Phys. Rev. Lett.75, 2847–2850 (1995)

  57. [57]

    Recipes for metastable states in spin glasses,

    S. Franz and G. Parisi, “Recipes for metastable states in spin glasses,” J. Phys. I5, 1401–1415 (1995)

  58. [58]

    Phase diagram of coupled glassy sys- tems: A mean-field study,

    S. Franz and G. Parisi, “Phase diagram of coupled glassy sys- tems: A mean-field study,” Phys. Rev. Lett.79, 2486 (1997)

  59. [59]

    Internal energy, specific heat and correlation function of the bond-random Ising model,

    H. Nishimori, “Internal energy, specific heat and correlation function of the bond-random Ising model,” Prog. Theor. Phys. 66, 1169–1181 (1981)

  60. [60]

    The replica momenta of a spin-glass and the phase diagram of n-colour ashkin-teller models,

    A Georges, D Hansel, P Le Doussal, and JM Maillard, “The replica momenta of a spin-glass and the phase diagram of n-colour ashkin-teller models,” Journal de physique48, 1–9 (1987)

  61. [61]

    Hamiltonian studies of the d= 2 ashkin-teller model,

    Mahito Kohmoto, Marcel den Nijs, and Leo P Kadanoff, “Hamiltonian studies of the d= 2 ashkin-teller model,” Physi- cal Review B24, 5229 (1981)

  62. [62]

    On critical properties of the ashkin-teller model,

    C Fan, “On critical properties of the ashkin-teller model,” Physics Letters A39, 136 (1972)

  63. [63]

    YCTP-P1-88 (1988)

    P Le Doussal and A Georges, Yale University Report No. YCTP-P1-88 (1988)

  64. [64]

    Multicritical point of ising spin glasses on triangular and honeycomb lattices,

    SLA De Queiroz, “Multicritical point of ising spin glasses on triangular and honeycomb lattices,” Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics73, 064410 (2006)

  65. [65]

    Location and properties of the multicritical point in the gaussian and±j ising spin glasses,

    SLA De Queiroz, “Location and properties of the multicritical point in the gaussian and±j ising spin glasses,” Physical Re- view B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics79, 174408 (2009)

  66. [66]

    Dynamical critical behavior on the nishimori point of frustrated ising models,

    R. Agrawal, L.F. Cugliandolo, L. Faoro, L.B. Ioffe, and M. Picco, “Dynamical critical behavior on the nishimori point of frustrated ising models,” Physical Review E110, 034120 (2024)

  67. [67]

    Replica symmetry and massless modes in the ising spin glass,

    AJ Bray and MA Moore, “Replica symmetry and massless modes in the ising spin glass,” Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics12, 79–104 (1979)

  68. [68]

    CriticalO(N)mod- els in6−ϵdimensions,

    L. Fei, S. Giombi, and I.R. Klebanov, “CriticalO(N)mod- els in6−ϵdimensions,” Phys. Rev. D90, 025018 (2014), arXiv:1404.1094

  69. [69]

    Cardy,Scaling and Renormalization in Statistical Physics (Cambridge University Press, 1996)

    J. Cardy,Scaling and Renormalization in Statistical Physics (Cambridge University Press, 1996)

  70. [70]

    Renormalization group for mea- surement and entanglement phase transitions,

    A. Nahum and K.J. Wiese, “Renormalization group for mea- surement and entanglement phase transitions,” Phys. Rev. B 108, 104203 (2023), arXiv:2303.07848

  71. [71]

    The two upper critical dimen- sions of the Ising and Potts models,

    K.J. Wiese and J.L. Jacobsen, “The two upper critical dimen- sions of the Ising and Potts models,” JHEP05, 092 (2024), arXiv:2311.01529

  72. [72]

    Phase transitions in three-dimensional loop models and theCP n−1 sigma model,

    A. Nahum, J.T. Chalker, P. Serna, M. Ortu ˜no, and A.M. So- moza, “Phase transitions in three-dimensional loop models and theCP n−1 sigma model,” Phys. Rev. B88, 134411 (2013)

  73. [73]

    Irrelevance in the(d−2)expan- sion of nonlinear sigma and Heisenberg models,

    E. Brezin and S. Hikami, “Irrelevance in the(d−2)expan- sion of nonlinear sigma and Heisenberg models,” Phys. Rev. 55, R10169–72 (1996)

  74. [74]

    to appear,

    Alapan Das and et al, “to appear,”

  75. [75]

    Self-avoiding tethered membranes at the tricritical point,

    K.J. Wiese and F. David, “Self-avoiding tethered membranes at the tricritical point,” Nucl. Phys. B450, 495–557 (1995), cond- mat/9503126

  76. [76]

    Scaling of self-avoiding tethered membranes: 2-loop renormalization group results,

    F. David and K.J. Wiese, “Scaling of self-avoiding tethered membranes: 2-loop renormalization group results,” Phys. Rev. Lett.76, 4564 (1996), cond-mat/9602125

  77. [77]

    New renormalization group results 31 for scaling of self-avoiding tethered membranes,

    K.J. Wiese and F. David, “New renormalization group results 31 for scaling of self-avoiding tethered membranes,” Nucl. Phys. B 487, 529–632 (1997), cond-mat/9608022

  78. [78]

    Theory of dynamical criti- cal phenomena,

    P.C. Hohenberg and B.I. Halperin, “Theory of dynamical criti- cal phenomena,” Rev. Mod. Phys.49, 435 (1977)

  79. [79]

    World- sheet patching, 1-form symmetries, and landau* phase transi- tions,

    Pablo Serna, Andr ´es M Somoza, and Adam Nahum, “World- sheet patching, 1-form symmetries, and landau* phase transi- tions,” Physical Review B110, 115102 (2024)

  80. [80]

    Probing topological spin liquids on a programmable quantum simula- tor,

    Giulia Semeghini, Harry Levine, Alexander Keesling, Sepehr Ebadi, Tout T Wang, Dolev Bluvstein, Ruben Verresen, Hannes Pichler, Marcin Kalinowski, Rhine Samajdar,et al., “Probing topological spin liquids on a programmable quantum simula- tor,” Science374, 1242–1247 (2021)

Showing first 80 references.