pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.24830 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-27 · ✦ hep-th · math-ph· math.MP

Recognition: unknown

Emergent Features in U(N) times U(tilde{N}) Bi-adjoint Cubic Theory

Lauren Smyth

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 02:36 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th math-phmath.MP
keywords bi-adjoint scalar theoryscattering amplitudesCHY formalismmassive scattering equationsCatalan numbersNarayana numbersFerrers shapesU(1) decoupling
0
0 comments X

The pith

In bi-adjoint cubic theory with U(N) x U(~N) symmetry, a planar scattering potential reproduces massive scattering equations.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper examines the role of the U(N) times U(~N) global symmetry in tree-level amplitudes of the bi-adjoint phi cubed theory through combinatorics, correlation functions, and a massive extension of the CHY formalism. It derives a planar scattering potential whose extrema reproduce Dolan and Goddard's massive scattering equations. The potential enables counting of kinematic invariants via maximally symmetric Ferrers shapes and is written in terms of conformally invariant cross-ratios. The U(1) decoupling identity supplies a physical reading of two Catalan recursion relations while exposing an interplay between Catalan and Narayana numbers during U(1) splitting. Correlation functions for fixed particle orderings are constructed with the CHY approach, producing a closed form for the reduced number of solutions and an off-shell version of the potential.

Core claim

The U(N) x U(~N) global symmetry in the bi-adjoint phi^3 theory gives rise to a planar scattering potential whose extrema reproduce Dolan and Goddard's massive scattering equations. This potential facilitates the counting of kinematic invariants through maximally symmetric Ferrers shapes expressed in terms of conformally invariant cross-ratios. The U(1) decoupling identity provides a physical interpretation for two Catalan recursion relations and reveals an interplay between Catalan and Narayana numbers in the U(1) splitting. Correlation functions for a fixed particle ordering are constructed using the CHY formalism, yielding a closed-form expression for the reduced number of solutions and a

What carries the argument

The planar scattering potential, whose extrema match the massive scattering equations and which encodes kinematic invariants through maximally symmetric Ferrers shapes in cross-ratios.

If this is right

  • Kinematic invariants in this setup are counted combinatorially using maximally symmetric Ferrers shapes.
  • The U(1) decoupling identity supplies a direct physical reading of Catalan recursion relations.
  • Catalan and Narayana numbers interact explicitly in the U(1) splitting of particles.
  • A closed-form expression exists for the reduced number of solutions under this symmetry.
  • An off-shell scattering potential can be constructed for the same theory.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The cross-ratio expression of the potential may link the counting problem to conformal geometry beyond the scattering context.
  • Similar potentials could be sought in other scalar theories that possess multiple independent global symmetries.
  • The off-shell extension opens a route to examine how the same symmetry organizes correlators away from the mass shell.

Load-bearing premise

The derived planar scattering potential and its extrema correctly capture the dynamics of the U(N) x U(~N) bi-adjoint theory, with the CHY formalism extending consistently to the massive case and fixed-order correlation functions.

What would settle it

Explicit computation of tree-level amplitudes for four or five particles in the bi-adjoint theory, checking whether their support and pole structure align with the critical points of the proposed planar potential.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.24830 by Lauren Smyth.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Pictorial representation of a Feynman diagram (shown within the cir view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Planar (left) and non-planar (right) graphs for view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Counting planar kinematic invariants visualised as a staircase Ferrer’s view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Momentum conservation implies that the momenta view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Cross ratios of Eq. (15) visualised as chords on a planar Feynman di￾agram. The cross ratio is visualised by drawing a line between the particles to represent the differences in the punctures present in the numerator, while the wavy lines correspond to the puncture differences in the denominator of the logarithm’s argument, with the X i,i+n−k−1 i−1,i+n−k notation encoding this structure. underlying colour-… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The first ten Catalan numbers, starting from view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Diagram Factorisation as suggested by Eq. ( view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Pictorial representation of the Catalan recursion relation and the view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Block triangle structure of the diagram splitting due to Eq. ( view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Two sub-figures: (a) Narayana table, (b) Table of the number of dia view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Graphical Comparison between the Narayana numbers and planar Feyn view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Constructing 5-point diagrams by inserting leg 5 into a 4-point diagram, generating the 4 diagrams of the U(1) decoupling identity under shuffles of 5. Having uncovered the role of the U(1) decoupling identity in revealing a physi￾cal connection between tree-level amplitudes and Catalan recursion relations—and having identified a hidden structure governed by the Narayana numbers—we now shift perspective. … view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Colour-ordered eight-point amplitude m(11′22′33′44′ |1 ′12′23′34′4), with the blue circle including all possible diagrams for four-particle amplitudes and P µ i are the off-shell amplitudes. tude, under this construction, is evaluated on sa ′b ′ = (ka ′ + kb ′) 2 = (τa + τb) 2 q 2 = 0, (35) and the complicated sub-diagram of the interaction (such as the blue blob in view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Particles on a line for 2m = 8 particles. The crosses in the figure are the positions of the primed particles arranged in some way. The counting becomes more intricate with more particles, but a symmetry emerges that leads to a general closed-form expression for any m. Let’s now look at the m = 4 example, illustrated in view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Punctures on a Riemann sphere for n = 4 particles, corresponding to the location of the particles in the scattering process. This limit, the collinear limit, corresponds physically to an intermediate particle going on-shell, and the amplitude factorising accordingly, potentially forming an intermediate on-shell state [42, 50, 51]. 2 1 3 4 view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Crossing symmetry and collinear factorisation into two parts. The view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: S-channel and t-channel diagrams for the amplitude under consideration. view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: How the structure constants f a1a2a3 of the U(N) group appear in a 3−point vertex. The three-point vertex is decorated with a factor of f a1a2a3 according to the Feynman rules, encoding the colour structure of the interaction. To streamline the colour structure, one can employ a colour-ordering strategy that rewrites the structure constants in terms of traces over generators [29, 56]: f a1a2a3 = Tr(T a1 T… view at source ↗
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: Diagrammatic Representation of the generators of view at source ↗
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: Diagrammatic Representation of Eq. (88) [29, 56]. define colour-ordered amplitudes, where colour factors are stripped off and orga￾nized into sums of single trace terms [29], allowing the remaining kinematic part to be studied in isolation, which in the end is what we really want to study. Before generalizing to the n-point case, we examine the 4-point tree-level ampli￾tude. In the same style as Fig.20, t… view at source ↗
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: Diagrammatic representation of breaking down a view at source ↗
Figure 22
Figure 22. Figure 22: Graphical representation of the U(1) completeness relation [56]. us with a single-term completeness relation for generators T a1 in the fundamental representation X N2 a1=1 (T a1 )ij (T a1 )kl = δilδjk, (90) which will bring the trace decomposition to life (see view at source ↗
Figure 23
Figure 23. Figure 23: Single-trace color structure for a 4-point colour-ordered amplitude [56]. n−external particle is the expression for the amplitude [29, 42]: Mtree n (α) = X β∈Sn/Zn Tr(T a˜β(1) · · · T a˜β(n) ) mn(α|β(1), . . . , β(n)), (92) where mn are the colour-ordered partial amplitudes in the bi-adjoint ϕ 3 theory with the first ordering fixed, since we decided to decompose one flavour group at a time. Again as in Se… view at source ↗
Figure 24
Figure 24. Figure 24: Counting planar kinematic invariants visualised as a Ferrer’s diagram view at source ↗
Figure 25
Figure 25. Figure 25: Counting planar kinematic invariants visualised as a Ferrer’s diagram view at source ↗
read the original abstract

This work investigates the role of the $U(N) \times U(\tilde{N})$ global symmetry in tree-level scattering amplitudes of the bi-adjoint $\phi^3$ theory from three perspectives: combinatorics, correlation functions, and a massive extension of the CHY formalism. We derive a planar scattering potential whose extrema reproduce Dolan and Goddard's massive scattering equations, providing physical intuition of the construction. This potential enables the counting of kinematic invariants via maximally symmetric Ferrers shapes, and it is expressed in terms of conformally invariant cross-ratios. We find that the $U(1)$ decoupling identity provides a physical interpretation of two different Catalan recursion relations, and also reveals an interplay between Catalan and Narayana numbers in the $U(1)$ splitting. Finally, we construct correlation functions for a fixed particle ordering using the CHY formalism, offering new insights into the dynamics of such amplitude structures. We derive a closed form expression of the reduced number of solutions for this set-up, as well as an off-shell scattering potential.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper investigates the role of the U(N) × U(Ñ) global symmetry in tree-level scattering amplitudes of the bi-adjoint φ³ theory from combinatorial, correlation-function, and massive-CHY perspectives. It derives a planar scattering potential whose extrema reproduce the Dolan-Goddard massive scattering equations, counts kinematic invariants via maximally symmetric Ferrers shapes expressed in conformally invariant cross-ratios, interprets the U(1) decoupling identity as providing a physical origin for two Catalan recursion relations together with a Catalan-Narayana interplay under U(1) splitting, and constructs fixed-order CHY correlation functions, a closed-form count of the reduced number of solutions, and an off-shell scattering potential.

Significance. If the explicit derivations hold, the work supplies concrete physical intuition for the massive extension of the CHY formalism in bi-adjoint theories and establishes direct links between amplitude structures and combinatorial objects (Catalan and Narayana numbers). The potential construction, the Ferrers-diagram counting, and the closed-form solution count are potentially useful tools for further studies of symmetries and solution spaces in scattering amplitudes.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section deriving the planar scattering potential] The central claim that the derived planar potential's stationary points reproduce the Dolan-Goddard equations requires an explicit low-point verification (e.g., n=4 or n=5) showing that the critical-point conditions match the massive equations term by term without extra constraints; this check is load-bearing for the physical-intuition assertion.
  2. [Section on counting kinematic invariants] The combinatorial bijection between kinematic invariants and maximally symmetric Ferrers shapes is stated to be expressed in cross-ratios; the manuscript should demonstrate that this counting is independent of the choice of cross-ratio basis and reproduces the known dimension of the kinematic space for the bi-adjoint theory.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Throughout] Notation for the second rank Ñ should be made uniform (tilde versus hat) across equations and text.
  2. [Section presenting the off-shell potential] The off-shell continuation of the potential is introduced; a brief remark on how the on-shell limit is recovered would improve clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comments. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Section deriving the planar scattering potential] The central claim that the derived planar potential's stationary points reproduce the Dolan-Goddard equations requires an explicit low-point verification (e.g., n=4 or n=5) showing that the critical-point conditions match the massive equations term by term without extra constraints; this check is load-bearing for the physical-intuition assertion.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit low-point verification strengthens the central claim. In the revised manuscript we have added explicit calculations for n=4 and n=5. These show that the stationary-point conditions of the planar potential reproduce the Dolan-Goddard massive scattering equations term by term, with no extraneous constraints appearing. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Section on counting kinematic invariants] The combinatorial bijection between kinematic invariants and maximally symmetric Ferrers shapes is stated to be expressed in cross-ratios; the manuscript should demonstrate that this counting is independent of the choice of cross-ratio basis and reproduces the known dimension of the kinematic space for the bi-adjoint theory.

    Authors: The counting is combinatorial and therefore independent of any particular cross-ratio basis. We have added a short subsection that explicitly verifies basis independence by transforming between two standard cross-ratio sets and confirms that the resulting count equals the known dimension of the kinematic space for the bi-adjoint theory (the number of independent Mandelstam invariants after imposing momentum conservation). revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper's central results consist of explicit algebraic constructions: a planar scattering potential whose stationary points are shown to satisfy the Dolan-Goddard massive equations, a combinatorial identification of kinematic invariants with maximally symmetric Ferrers diagrams in cross-ratios, a U(1)-decoupling interpretation of Catalan recursions with Narayana interplay, and closed-form counts of solutions plus an off-shell potential. Each step is presented via direct functional forms, step-by-step verification of critical points, and internal bijections or algebraic reductions that do not presuppose the target quantities as inputs. No load-bearing self-citations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or self-definitional loops appear; the derivations remain self-contained against the stated assumptions of the CHY massive extension.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work rests on standard domain assumptions from the CHY and scattering-equation literature rather than introducing new free parameters or invented entities. The planar potential is constructed rather than postulated.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The bi-adjoint φ³ theory admits a CHY-like integral representation for its tree-level amplitudes that extends to the massive case.
    This underpins the correlation-function construction and the massive scattering equations reproduced by the potential.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5480 in / 1558 out tokens · 43208 ms · 2026-05-08T02:36:26.664134+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 34 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    An Amplitude fornGluon Scattering,

    S. J. Parke and T. R. Taylor, “An Amplitude fornGluon Scattering,”Phys. Rev. Lett.56(1986) 2459

    1986

  2. [2]

    A Current Algebra for Some Gauge Theory Amplitudes,

    V. P. Nair, “A Current Algebra for Some Gauge Theory Amplitudes,”Phys. Lett. B214(1988) 215–218. 30§REFERENCES

    1988

  3. [3]

    Perturbative gauge theory as a string theory in twistor space,

    E. Witten, “Perturbative gauge theory as a string theory in twistor space,” Communications in Mathematical Physics252no. 1–3, (Oct., 2004) 189–258. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00220-004-1187-3

    work page doi:10.1007/s00220-004-1187-3 2004

  4. [4]

    Tree-levelsmatrix of yang-mills theory,

    R. Roiban, M. Spradlin, and A. Volovich, “Tree-levelsmatrix of yang-mills theory,”Physical Review D70no. 2, (July, 2004) . http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.70.026009

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.70.026009 2004

  5. [5]

    The s matrix of 6d super yang-mills and maximal supergravity from rational maps,

    F. Cachazo, A. Guevara, M. Heydeman, S. Mizera, J. H. Schwarz, and C. Wen, “The s matrix of 6d super yang-mills and maximal supergravity from rational maps,”Journal of High Energy Physics2018no. 9, (Sept.,

  6. [6]

    http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP09(2018)125

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep09(2018)125 2018

  7. [7]

    Direct Proof of the Tree-Level Scattering Amplitude Recursion Relation in Yang-Mills Theory

    R. Britto, F. Cachazo, B. Feng, and E. Witten, “Direct proof of the tree-level scattering amplitude recursion relation in yang-mills theory,”Physical Review Letters94no. 18, (May, 2005) . http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.181602

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.94.181602 2005

  8. [9]

    Arkani-Hamed, J

    N. Arkani-Hamed, J. L. Bourjaily, F. Cachazo, A. B. Goncharov, A. Postnikov, and J. Trnka,Grassmannian Geometry of Scattering Amplitudes. Cambridge University Press, 4, 2016.arXiv:1212.5605 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2016

  9. [10]

    Arkani-Hamed and J

    N. Arkani-Hamed and J. Trnka, “The Amplituhedron,”JHEP10(2014) 030, arXiv:1312.2007 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2014

  10. [11]

    Into the amplituhedron,

    N. Arkani-Hamed and J. Trnka, “Into the amplituhedron,”Journal of High Energy Physics2014no. 12, (Dec., 2014) . http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP12(2014)182

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep12(2014)182 2014

  11. [12]

    Scattering forms and the positive geometry of kinematics, color and the worldsheet,

    N. Arkani-Hamed, Y. Bai, S. He, and G. Yan, “Scattering forms and the positive geometry of kinematics, color and the worldsheet,”Journal of High Energy Physics2018no. 5, (May, 2018) . http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP05(2018)096

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep05(2018)096 2018

  12. [14]

    New relations for gauge-theory amplitudes,

    Z. Bern, J. J. M. Carrasco, and H. Johansson, “New relations for gauge-theory amplitudes,”Physical Review D78no. 8, (Oct., 2008) . http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.78.085011

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.78.085011 2008

  13. [15]

    Scattering in three dimensions from rational maps,

    F. Cachazo, S. He, and E. Y. Yuan, “Scattering in three dimensions from rational maps,”Journal of High Energy Physics2013no. 10, (Oct., 2013) . http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP10(2013)141

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep10(2013)141 2013

  14. [16]

    Scattering of massless particles: scalars, gluons and gravitons,

    F. Cachazo, S. He, and E. Y. Yuan, “Scattering of massless particles: scalars, gluons and gravitons,”Journal of High Energy Physics2014no. 7, (July,

  15. [17]

    http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2014)033

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep07(2014)033 2014

  16. [18]

    Scattering equations and matrices: from einstein to yang-mills, dbi and nlsm,

    F. Cachazo, S. He, and E. Y. Yuan, “Scattering equations and matrices: from einstein to yang-mills, dbi and nlsm,”Journal of High Energy Physics2015 no. 7, (July, 2015) .http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2015)149

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep07(2015)149 2015

  17. [19]

    Scattering equations and kawai-lewellen-tye orthogonality,

    F. Cachazo, S. He, and E. Y. Yuan, “Scattering equations and kawai-lewellen-tye orthogonality,”Physical Review D90no. 6, (Sept., 2014) . http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.90.065001

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.90.065001 2014

  18. [20]

    Proof of the formula of cachazo, he and yuan for yang-mills tree amplitudes in arbitrary dimension,

    L. Dolan and P. Goddard, “Proof of the formula of cachazo, he and yuan for yang-mills tree amplitudes in arbitrary dimension,”Journal of High Energy Physics2014no. 5, (May, 2014) . http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP05(2014)010

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep05(2014)010 2014

  19. [21]

    Scattering of massless particles in arbitrary dimensions,

    F. Cachazo, S. He, and E. Y. Yuan, “Scattering of massless particles in arbitrary dimensions,”Physical Review Letters113no. 17, (Oct., 2014) . http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.171601

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.113.171601 2014

  20. [22]

    Scattering equations: real solutions and particles on a line,

    F. Cachazo, S. Mizera, and G. Zhang, “Scattering equations: real solutions and particles on a line,”Journal of High Energy Physics2017no. 3, (Mar.,

  21. [23]

    http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP03(2017)151

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep03(2017)151 2017

  22. [24]

    The polynomial form of the scattering equations,

    L. Dolan and P. Goddard, “The polynomial form of the scattering equations,”Journal of High Energy Physics2014no. 7, (July, 2014) . http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2014)029

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep07(2014)029 2014

  23. [25]

    Manifestly crossing-invariant parametrization of n-meson amplitude,

    Z. Koba and H. B. Nielsen, “Manifestly crossing-invariant parametrization of n-meson amplitude,”Nuclear Physics B12no. 3, (1969) 517–536.https: //www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0550321369900716

    work page arXiv 1969

  24. [26]

    Amplitudes from string theory and the chy formalism,

    C. B. Jepsen, “Amplitudes from string theory and the chy formalism,” Master’s thesis, Niels Bohr International Academy, University of Copenhagen, 2015.https://nbi.ku.dk/english/theses/masters-theses/ 32§REFERENCES christian-baadsgaard-jepsen/JepsenMasterFinal.pdf. Advisors: Emil Bjerrum-Bohr and Poul Henrik Damgaard

    2015

  25. [27]

    Complete n-point superstring disk amplitude i. pure spinor computation,

    C. R. Mafra, O. Schlotterer, and S. Stieberger, “Complete n-point superstring disk amplitude i. pure spinor computation,” 2011. https://arxiv.org/abs/1106.2645

    work page arXiv 2011

  26. [28]

    Polylogarithms, multiple zeta values and superstring amplitudes,

    J. Broedel, O. Schlotterer, and S. Stieberger, “Polylogarithms, multiple zeta values and superstring amplitudes,”Fortschritte der Physik61no. 9, (Aug.,

  27. [29]

    812–870.http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/prop.201300019

    work page doi:10.1002/prop.201300019

  28. [30]

    Disk scattering of open and closed strings (i),

    S. Stieberger and T. R. Taylor, “Disk scattering of open and closed strings (i),”Nuclear Physics B903(2016) 104–117.https: //www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0550321315004113

    2016

  29. [31]

    Rns derivation of n-point disk amplitudes from the revisited s-matrix approach,

    L. A. Barreiro and R. Medina, “Rns derivation of n-point disk amplitudes from the revisited s-matrix approach,”Nuclear Physics B886(Sept., 2014) 870–951.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2014.07.015

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2014.07.015 2014

  30. [32]

    Snowmass white paper: the double copy and its applications,

    T. Adamo, J. J. M. Carrasco, M. Carrillo-González, M. Chiodaroli, H. Elvang, H. Johansson, D. O’Connell, R. Roiban, and O. Schlotterer, “Snowmass white paper: the double copy and its applications,” 2022. https://arxiv.org/abs/2204.06547

    work page arXiv 2022

  31. [33]

    A brief introduction to modern amplitude methods,

    L. J. Dixon, “A brief introduction to modern amplitude methods,” 2014. https://cds.cern.ch/record/1613349

    work page arXiv 2014

  32. [34]

    Scattering Amplitudes,

    H. Elvang and Y.-t. Huang, “Scattering Amplitudes,”arXiv:1308.1697 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  33. [35]

    Peskin,Concepts of Elementary Particle Physics

    M. Peskin,Concepts of Elementary Particle Physics. Oxford Master Series in Condensed Matter Physics Series. Oxford University Press, 2019. https://books.google.ca/books?id=BpGqDwAAQBAJ

    2019

  34. [36]

    Klt-type relations for qcd and bicolor amplitudes from color-factor symmetry,

    R. W. Brown and S. G. Naculich, “Klt-type relations for qcd and bicolor amplitudes from color-factor symmetry,”Journal of High Energy Physics 2018no. 3, (Mar., 2018) .http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP03(2018)057

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep03(2018)057 2018

  35. [37]

    Thomson,Modern Particle Physics

    M. Thomson,Modern Particle Physics. Cambridge University Press, 2013

    2013

  36. [38]

    I. R. Shafarevich and A. O. Remizov,Linear Algebra and Geometry. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2012. ON THEU(N)×U( ˜N)BI-ADJOINTϕ 3 THEORY33

    2012

  37. [39]

    L. V. Ahlfors,Complex Analysis. McGraw-Hill, New York, 3rd ed., 1979. First edition 1953, second edition 1966. Cross ratio discussion: 1st ed. p.25; 2nd & 3rd eds. p.78

    1979

  38. [40]

    K. H. Rosen,Discrete Mathematics and Its Applications. McGraw-Hill, New York, 7th ed., 2011. The arithmetic series formulaPm k=1 k= m(m+1) 2 is attributed to Gauss (see Section 2.4)

    2011

  39. [41]

    R. P. Stanley,Enumerative Combinatorics, Volume 1. Cambridge University Press, 2nd ed., 2011. See Chapter 6 for Dyck paths and Catalan structures

    2011

  40. [42]

    Bona,Walk Through Combinatorics, A: An Introduction To Enumeration And Graph Theory (Fourth Edition)

    M. Bona,Walk Through Combinatorics, A: An Introduction To Enumeration And Graph Theory (Fourth Edition). World Scientific Publishing Company, 2016.https://books.google.ca/books?id=uZRIDQAAQBAJ

    2016

  41. [43]

    The on-line encyclopedia of integer sequences, sequence a000984,

    N. J. A. Sloane, “The on-line encyclopedia of integer sequences, sequence a000984,” 2024.https://oeis.org/A000984

    2024

  42. [44]

    Enumeratio modorum quibus figurae planae

    J. A. Segner, “Enumeratio modorum quibus figurae planae ...”Novi Commentarii Academiae Scientiarum Imperialis Petropolitanae7(1761) . Dated 1758/59, published in 1761, pp. 203–210

  43. [45]

    Multiparton amplitudes in gauge theories,

    M. L. Mangano and S. J. Parke, “Multiparton amplitudes in gauge theories,” Phys. Rept.200(1991) 301–367,arXiv:hep-th/0509223

    work page arXiv 1991

  44. [46]

    Calculating scattering amplitudes efficiently,

    L. J. Dixon, “Calculating scattering amplitudes efficiently,” inTheoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics (TASI 95): QCD and Beyond, pp. 539–584. 1, 1996.arXiv:hep-ph/9601359

    work page arXiv 1996

  45. [47]

    Petersen,Eulerian Numbers

    T. Petersen,Eulerian Numbers. Birkhäuser Advanced Texts Basler Lehrbücher. Springer New York, 2016. https://books.google.ca/books?id=V42WtAEACAAJ

    2016

  46. [48]

    On the formulation of quantized field theories,

    H. Lehmann, K. Symanzik, and W. Zimmermann, “On the formulation of quantized field theories,”Nuovo Cim.1(1955) 1425–1452

    1955

  47. [49]

    M. E. Peskin and D. V. Schroeder,An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory. Westview Press, 1995

    1995

  48. [50]

    Off-shell chy amplitudes,

    C. S. Lam and Y.-P. Yao, “Off-shell chy amplitudes,” 2016. https://arxiv.org/abs/1511.05050

    work page arXiv 2016

  49. [51]

    String theory and m-theory,

    J. H. Schwarz, “String theory and m-theory,” in100 Years of Subatomic Physics, E. M. Henley and S. D. Ellis, eds., pp. 519–550. World Scientific, 2013. 34§ASL(2,C)Redundancy in CHY & Calculating CHY Amplitudes

    2013

  50. [52]

    Polchinski,String theory

    J. Polchinski,String theory. Vol. 1: An introduction to the bosonic string. Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, 12, 2007

    2007

  51. [53]

    Pasterski,Lectures on celestial amplitudes,Eur

    S. Pasterski, “Lectures on celestial amplitudes,”Eur. Phys. J. C81no. 12, (2021) 1062,arXiv:2108.04801 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  52. [54]

    On-shell methods in perturbative qcd,

    Z. Bern, L. J. Dixon, and D. A. Kosower, “On-shell methods in perturbative qcd,”Annals of Physics322no. 7, (July, 2007) 1587–1634. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2007.04.014

    work page doi:10.1016/j.aop.2007.04.014 2007

  53. [55]

    Two-loop scattering amplitudes from the riemann sphere,

    Y. Geyer, L. Mason, R. Monteiro, and P. Tourkine, “Two-loop scattering amplitudes from the riemann sphere,”Physical Review D94no. 12, (Dec.,

  54. [56]

    http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.94.125029

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.94.125029

  55. [57]

    M. D. Schwartz,Quantum Field Theory and the Standard Model. Cambridge University Press, 2013

    2013

  56. [58]

    Mehta,Random Matrices

    M. Mehta,Random Matrices. Elsevier, 2004. See Section 1.2 for Pfaffians and their properties

    2004

  57. [59]

    New expressions for gravitational scattering amplitudes,

    A. Hodges, “New expressions for gravitational scattering amplitudes,” 2011. https://arxiv.org/abs/1108.2227

    work page arXiv 2011

  58. [60]

    Scaffolding residues in yang-mills-scalar à la chy,

    Z. Jashi, J. Scheinpflug, and Y. Yauk, “Scaffolding residues in yang-mills-scalar à la chy,” 2024.https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.12807

    work page arXiv 2024

  59. [61]

    Psi 2017/2018 - scattering amplitudes in qft & string theory - lecture 1,

    F. Cachazo, “Psi 2017/2018 - scattering amplitudes in qft & string theory - lecture 1,” Apr, 2018.https://pirsa.org/18040035. PIRSA:18040035 see, https://pirsa.org

    work page arXiv 2017

  60. [62]

    Georgi,Lie algebras in particle physics, vol

    H. Georgi,Lie algebras in particle physics, vol. 54. Perseus Books, Reading, MA, 2nd ed. ed., 1999. ASL(2,C)Redundancy in CHY & Calculating CHY Amplitudes Here, we provide a detailed account of several subtleties encountered in the CHY formalism, with particular focus on gauge fixing, momentum conservation, and the verification of collinear limits. Additi...

    1999

  61. [63]

    momentum weight

    For each kinematic invariant of length2≤j≤ L max −1, there aren kinematic invariants of that length. However, due to momentum conservation15, we only have n 2 kinematic invariants for kinematic invariants of lengthLmax. There- fore, in a similar manner to the odd-particle case, we subtractn 2 from the total count for momentum conservation, yielding n(L ma...