arxiv: 2604.24861 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-27 · 🌀 gr-qc · hep-th

Recognition: unknown

Hawking radiation with dispersion: reconciling the Bogoliubov and tunneling approaches

Francesco Del Porro , Stefano Liberati , Marc Schneider

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 01:58 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc hep-th

keywords Hawking radiationanalogue gravitymodified dispersion relationsBogoliubov coefficientstunneling methodeffective horizonsurface gravity

0 comments

The pith

Dispersive propagation creates an effective horizon that governs Hawking-like radiation, with Bogoliubov and tunneling methods agreeing in low-energy adiabatic limits.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper examines particle production in analogue gravity with superluminal modified dispersion relations. It establishes that for even, convex, polynomially bounded dispersions, outgoing modes are shaped by an effective horizon from dispersive effects. The Bogoliubov coefficients match the tunneling result under low-energy and adiabatic conditions, both yielding spectra set by an effective surface gravity. This connects the two approaches analytically and shows when Hawking radiation persists despite ultraviolet changes.

Core claim

For a broad class of even, convex, and polynomially bounded dispersion relations, the relevant outgoing modes are governed by an effective horizon induced by dispersive propagation. Extending the near-horizon S-matrix method, the Bogoliubov coefficients agree with the tunneling result in the low-energy and adiabatic limits, with the emission spectrum controlled by an effective surface gravity associated to the effective horizon.

What carries the argument

The effective horizon induced by dispersive propagation, which governs the relevant outgoing modes and determines the emission spectrum via an associated effective surface gravity.

If this is right

Bogoliubov and tunneling approaches give consistent predictions for the particle spectrum.
The spectrum exhibits controlled deviations from exact thermality.
Hawking radiation remains robust against ultraviolet modifications under the stated conditions on dispersion and limits.
The near-horizon S-matrix method extends beyond the purely sonic regime.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The effective-horizon picture could guide laboratory tests of dispersion effects in fluid or optical analogues.
If similar effective horizons appear in quantum-gravity-inspired models, the same matching between methods may apply.
Rapid background changes or dispersion scales comparable to the horizon scale would likely break the agreement and restore standard Hawking results or produce new features.

Load-bearing premise

The low-energy and adiabatic limits must be simultaneously accessible while the dispersion remains even, convex and polynomially bounded and the background does not vary too rapidly.

What would settle it

Measure the low-energy emission spectrum in an analogue system with a chosen even convex dispersion relation and check whether the temperature is set by the effective surface gravity of the dispersive horizon rather than the standard Hawking value.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.24861 by Francesco Del Porro, Marc Schneider, Stefano Liberati.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: FIG. 1: Mode characteristics in the view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2: Modes’ and approximant’s characteristics in the view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3: Contours of integration for the decaying mode. The light blue line (that corresponds to the case view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4: Contours of integration for the Hawking quanta. The light blue line again corresponds to the case view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5: Contours of integration for the growing mode. Both view at source ↗

read the original abstract

We investigate Hawking-like particle production in analogue gravity systems with superluminal modified dispersion relations. For a broad class of even, convex, and polynomially bounded dispersion relations, we show that the relevant outgoing modes are governed by an effective horizon induced by dispersive propagation. Extending the near-horizon S-matrix method beyond the purely sonic regime, we compute the Bogoliubov coefficients and demonstrate that, in the low-energy and adiabatic limits, they agree with the tunneling result obtained from the approximant ray. In both cases, the emission spectrum is controlled by an effective surface gravity associated to the effective horizon, leading to controlled deviations from exact thermality. Our results establish an analytical connection between the Bogoliubov and tunneling descriptions in dispersive settings and clarify the conditions under which Hawking radiation remains robust against ultraviolet modifications, with implications extending beyond analogue gravity.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper sketches an analytical match between Bogoliubov and tunneling calculations for dispersive Hawking radiation via an effective horizon, but the joint low-energy adiabatic limit looks like the weakest link.

read the letter

The main thing to know is that for even, convex, polynomially bounded dispersion relations the authors argue the outgoing modes see an effective horizon set by the dispersion itself. They extend the near-horizon S-matrix method past the sonic case, compute the Bogoliubov coefficients, and claim these match the tunneling result (via an approximant ray) once both the low-energy and adiabatic limits are taken. In both pictures the spectrum is then set by an effective surface gravity, giving controlled non-thermal corrections. That is the new piece: an explicit analytical bridge rather than separate numerical or approximate treatments. It is useful because analogue-gravity experiments sit in exactly this regime, so a cleaner way to estimate deviations from thermality without full simulation has practical value. The paper does a reasonable job laying out the class of dispersions and the robustness statement. The soft spot is whether the two limits can actually be reached together. If the dispersion scale is not parametrically separated from the horizon scale, or if the background varies too quickly, the adiabatic condition may fail before the low-energy regime is accessible, and the effective-horizon picture plus the coefficient agreement could collapse. The abstract states the result holds in those limits but supplies no explicit scale-separation argument or error estimates, so the domain of validity remains unclear. This is aimed at people working on analogue gravity and modified-dispersion Hawking radiation who already know the two standard methods. A reader who wants to see how the methods can be reconciled analytically will find something concrete to check. It deserves a serious referee: the claim is specific enough that the derivations can be verified or corrected, and the topic is relevant even if the limits turn out narrower than hoped. I would send it to peer review.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper investigates Hawking-like particle production in analogue gravity systems with superluminal modified dispersion relations. For a broad class of even, convex, and polynomially bounded dispersion relations, it shows that the relevant outgoing modes are governed by an effective horizon induced by dispersive propagation. Extending the near-horizon S-matrix method beyond the sonic regime, the Bogoliubov coefficients are computed and shown to agree with the tunneling result (via the approximant ray) in the low-energy and adiabatic limits; in both cases the emission spectrum is controlled by an effective surface gravity associated with the effective horizon, yielding controlled deviations from exact thermality.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the work provides an analytical bridge between the Bogoliubov and tunneling descriptions in dispersive analogue-gravity settings and clarifies the robustness of Hawking radiation against UV modifications. The explicit connection in the stated limits, together with the identification of an effective surface gravity, would be a useful addition to the literature on analogue Hawking radiation and its experimental implications.

major comments (2)

[Abstract and the discussion of limits following the main result] The central claim requires that the low-energy and adiabatic limits be simultaneously accessible for the stated class of dispersion relations while the background varies slowly enough for the adiabatic approximation to hold and for the Bogoliubov coefficients to match the tunneling result. The manuscript does not supply an explicit scale-separation argument or domain-of-validity estimate showing that these limits can be jointly reached without additional assumptions on the relative scales of dispersion and horizon steepness. This joint-limit step is load-bearing for the reconciliation and the effective-horizon picture.
[Sections deriving the effective surface gravity and the spectrum] The effective surface gravity is introduced as controlling the spectrum in both approaches, but the text does not make fully explicit whether this quantity is computed independently from the background geometry and dispersion or is defined in terms of the same quantities that enter the Bogoliubov or tunneling calculations. Clarification is needed to rule out circularity in the claimed agreement.

minor comments (2)

[§2 or §3] Notation for the approximant ray and the effective horizon should be introduced with a clear definition and a diagram or sketch of the relevant characteristics in the (x,ω) plane.
[Introduction or methods section] A short table or paragraph summarizing the precise assumptions on the dispersion relation (evenness, convexity, polynomial bound) and the precise meaning of the low-energy and adiabatic limits would improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive summary, the recognition of the paper's significance, and the constructive major comments. We address each point below and will incorporate clarifications and additional discussion in a revised manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract and the discussion of limits following the main result] The central claim requires that the low-energy and adiabatic limits be simultaneously accessible for the stated class of dispersion relations while the background varies slowly enough for the adiabatic approximation to hold and for the Bogoliubov coefficients to match the tunneling result. The manuscript does not supply an explicit scale-separation argument or domain-of-validity estimate showing that these limits can be jointly reached without additional assumptions on the relative scales of dispersion and horizon steepness. This joint-limit step is load-bearing for the reconciliation and the effective-horizon picture.

Authors: We appreciate the referee's emphasis on the need for explicit control over the joint limits. The manuscript states the agreement in the low-energy and adiabatic limits under the slow-variation assumption on the background, but does not provide a dedicated scale-separation estimate. We agree this is a valuable addition. In the revised manuscript we will insert a new paragraph (or short subsection) after the main result that supplies order-of-magnitude estimates relating the dispersion scale, the effective-horizon width, and the adiabaticity parameter. These estimates will delineate the regime in which the joint limit is accessible for the stated class of even, convex, polynomially bounded dispersion relations, without introducing assumptions beyond the slow-variation condition already used. revision: yes
Referee: [Sections deriving the effective surface gravity and the spectrum] The effective surface gravity is introduced as controlling the spectrum in both approaches, but the text does not make fully explicit whether this quantity is computed independently from the background geometry and dispersion or is defined in terms of the same quantities that enter the Bogoliubov or tunneling calculations. Clarification is needed to rule out circularity in the claimed agreement.

Authors: We thank the referee for raising the possibility of circularity. The effective surface gravity is defined independently of the subsequent calculations: it is the derivative, evaluated at the effective horizon, of the difference between the background flow velocity and the group velocity obtained from the dispersion relation. The location of this effective horizon is fixed solely by the background profile and the functional form of the dispersion relation. Only after this definition do we compute the Bogoliubov coefficients via the near-horizon S-matrix and the tunneling probability via the approximant ray; both then yield a spectrum controlled by the same independently obtained quantity. To remove any ambiguity we will revise the relevant sections to state this ordering explicitly, presenting the independent definition of the effective horizon and surface gravity before the Bogoliubov or tunneling results. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivation computes Bogoliubov coefficients independently and matches tunneling result in explicit limits

full rationale

The paper derives the effective horizon from the dispersive propagation for the stated class of relations, then extends the S-matrix method to compute Bogoliubov coefficients directly. It separately obtains the tunneling result via the approximant ray and shows agreement only after taking the low-energy and adiabatic limits. The effective surface gravity is defined from the effective horizon geometry, not fitted to the spectrum. No step reduces by construction to its input, no load-bearing self-citation chain is used, and the central claim rests on explicit calculation rather than renaming or ansatz smuggling. The result is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumption that the dispersion relation remains even, convex and polynomially bounded, together with the existence of well-separated low-energy and adiabatic regimes. No free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Dispersion relations are even, convex, and polynomially bounded.
Stated in the abstract as the class for which the effective-horizon result holds.
domain assumption Low-energy and adiabatic limits can be taken simultaneously.
Required for the agreement between Bogoliubov and tunneling calculations.

invented entities (1)

effective horizon induced by dispersive propagation no independent evidence
purpose: To govern the relevant outgoing modes and define an effective surface gravity.
Introduced to reconcile the two calculation methods when the original horizon is modified by dispersion.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5442 in / 1431 out tokens · 30870 ms · 2026-05-08T01:58:47.406044+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 36 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

[1]

k-representation

Outgoing mode outside the EFH Following Section II B, we start by considering the Hamilton–Jacobi equations for the ingoing and the (soft red) outgoing modes outside of the acoustic black hole Ω−v X+ Ω (k) k=F(k) outgoing,(76a) Ω−v X − Ω (k) k=F(k) ingoing,(76b) whereX ± Ω represents the position of the ingoing (−) and outgoing (+) mode in thek-representa...
[2]

The dataset was derived from GITA, a manually curated Italian corpus, which un- derwent manual translation and localization into Standard Basque

Outgoing mode inside the EFH A similar reasoning can be done for the soft outgoing mode inside the EFH. In this case we should consider −Ω−v X+ Ω (k) k=−F(k) outgoing,(88a) Ω−v X − Ω (k) k=F(k) ingoing,(88b) and an analogous parametrization k+(k−) =k − +R(k −).(89) Within the same approximations of the previous section we get R(k−) =− 2v X − Ω k− v X − Ω ...

work page doi:10.13039/501100011033
[3]

Since the displacement of the effective horizonx 0 =O(y), this implies x0 =− 3 2 y κkh +O(y 2)

=−1− 3 2 y+O(y 2).(A9) 24 We fixed the sign ofF( ¯k) such thatv(0) =−1. Since the displacement of the effective horizonx 0 =O(y), this implies x0 =− 3 2 y κkh +O(y 2). Hence, for small energies, we can rewrite the effective horizon’s surface gravity as the Killing horizon’s surface gravity plus corrections v′(x0) =κ kh +κ ′ khx0 +O(x 2
[4]

=κ kh 1− 3 2 κ′ kh κ2kh y +O(y 2). On the other hand, when expandingκ efh at small values ofyusing (A5) and (A6) and combining this with the previous expansion yields κefh =κ kh 1− 3 2 κ′ kh κ2 KH y 1 + 3 2 y +O(y 2) =κ kh 1 + 3 2 1− κ′ kh κ2 KH y +O(y 2).(A10) Finally, using the condition for the effective horizon Ω =F( ¯k) + ¯kF ′(¯k) =− ¯k 2 + 3y√1 +y ...
[5]

S. W. Hawking, Particle creation by black holes, Communications in mathematical physics43, 199 (1975)

1975
[6]

W. G. Unruh, Experimental black hole evaporation, Phys. Rev. Lett.46, 1351 (1981)

1981
[7]

T. A. Jacobson, Black-hole evaporation and ultrashort distances, Phys. Rev. D44, 1731 (1991)

1991
[8]

T. A. Jacobson, Black hole radiation in the presence of a short distance cutoff, Phys. Rev. D48, 728 (1993), hep-th/9303103

work page arXiv 1993
[9]

W. G. Unruh, Sonic analog of black holes and the effects of high frequencies on black hole evaporation, Phys. Rev. D51, 2827 (1995), arXiv:gr-qc/9409008

work page arXiv 1995
[10]

Barcelo, S

C. Barcelo, S. Liberati, and M. Visser, Analogue gravity, Living Rev. Rel.8, 12 (2005), arXiv:gr-qc/0505065

work page arXiv 2005
[11]

Sch¨ utzhold, Ultra-cold atoms as quantum simulators for relativistic phenomena, Prog

R. Sch¨ utzhold, Ultra-cold atoms as quantum simulators for relativistic phenomena, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.145, 104198 (2025), arXiv:2501.03785 [quant-ph]

work page arXiv 2025
[12]

Brout, S

R. Brout, S. Massar, R. Parentani, and P. Spindel, Hawking radiation without transPlanckian frequencies, Phys. Rev. D 52, 4559 (1995), arXiv:hep-th/9506121

work page arXiv 1995
[13]

Corley and T

S. Corley and T. Jacobson, Hawking spectrum and high frequency dispersion, Phys. Rev. D54, 1568 (1996), arXiv:hep- th/9601073

work page arXiv 1996
[14]

Corley, Computing the spectrum of black hole radiation in the presence of high frequency dispersion: An Analytical approach, Phys

S. Corley, Computing the spectrum of black hole radiation in the presence of high frequency dispersion: An Analytical approach, Phys. Rev. D57, 6280 (1998), arXiv:hep-th/9710075

work page arXiv 1998
[15]

Himemoto and T

Y. Himemoto and T. Tanaka, A Generalization of the model of Hawking radiation with modified high frequency dispersion relation, Phys. Rev. D61, 064004 (2000), arXiv:gr-qc/9904076

work page arXiv 2000
[16]

Saida and M.-a

H. Saida and M.-a. Sakagami, Black hole radiation with high frequency dispersion, Phys. Rev. D61, 084023 (2000), arXiv:gr-qc/9905034

work page arXiv 2000
[17]

W. G. Unruh and R. Schutzhold, On the universality of the Hawking effect, Phys. Rev. D71, 024028 (2005), arXiv:gr- qc/0408009

work page arXiv 2005
[18]

Macher and R

J. Macher and R. Parentani, Black/White hole radiation from dispersive theories, Phys. Rev. D79, 124008 (2009), arXiv:0903.2224 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2009
[19]

Macher and R

J. Macher and R. Parentani, Black hole radiation in Bose-Einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. A80, 043601 (2009), arXiv:0905.3634 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

work page arXiv 2009
[20]

Finazzi and R

S. Finazzi and R. Parentani, Spectral properties of acoustic black hole radiation: broadening the horizon, Phys. Rev. D 83, 084010 (2011), arXiv:1012.1556 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2011
[21]

Finazzi and R

S. Finazzi and R. Parentani, On the robustness of acoustic black hole spectra, J. Phys. Conf. Ser.314, 012030 (2011), arXiv:1102.1452 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2011
[22]

Coutant, R

A. Coutant, R. Parentani, and S. Finazzi, Black hole radiation with short distance dispersion, an analytical S-matrix approach, Phys. Rev. D85, 024021 (2012), arXiv:1108.1821 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2012
[23]

Finazzi and R

S. Finazzi and R. Parentani, Hawking radiation in dispersive theories, the two regimes, Phys. Rev. D85, 124027 (2012), arXiv:1202.6015 [gr-qc]. 25

work page arXiv 2012
[24]

Michel and R

F. Michel and R. Parentani, Probing the thermal character of analogue hawking radiation for shallow water waves?, Phys. Rev. D90, 044033 (2014)

2014
[25]

Michel and R

F. Michel and R. Parentani, Mode mixing in sub- and trans-critical flows over an obstacle: When should Hawking’s predictions be recovered?, in14th Marcel Grossmann Meeting on Recent Developments in Theoretical and Experimental General Relativity, Astrophysics, and Relativistic Field Theories, Vol. 2 (2017) pp. 1709–1717, arXiv:1508.02044 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2017
[26]

Del Porro, S

F. Del Porro, S. Liberati, and M. Schneider, Tunneling method for Hawking quanta in analogue gravity, Comptes Rendus Physique25, 1 (2025), arXiv:2406.14603 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2025
[27]

M. K. Parikh and F. Wilczek, Hawking radiation as tunneling, Phys. Rev. Lett.85, 5042 (2000), arXiv:hep-th/9907001

work page arXiv 2000
[28]

Srinivasan and T

K. Srinivasan and T. Padmanabhan, Particle production and complex path analysis, Physical Review D60, 024007 (1999)

1999
[29]

Vanzo, G

L. Vanzo, G. Acquaviva, and R. Di Criscienzo, Tunnelling Methods and Hawking’s radiation: achievements and prospects, Class. Quant. Grav.28, 183001 (2011), arXiv:1106.4153 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2011
[30]

J. M. M. Senovilla and R. Torres, Particle production from marginally trapped surfaces of general spacetimes, Class. Quant. Grav.32, 085004 (2015), [Erratum: Class.Quant.Grav. 32, 189501 (2015)], arXiv:1409.6044 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2015
[31]

Giavoni and M

C. Giavoni and M. Schneider, Quantum effects across dynamical horizons, Class. Quant. Grav.37, 215020 (2020), arXiv:2003.11095 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2020
[32]

Moretti and N

V. Moretti and N. Pinamonti, State independence for tunnelling processes through black hole horizons and hawking radiation, Communications in Mathematical Physics309, 295 (2012)

2012
[33]

Sch¨ utzhold and W

R. Sch¨ utzhold and W. G. Unruh, Hawking radiation with dispersion versus breakdown of the WKB approximation, Phys. Rev. D88, 124009 (2013), arXiv:1308.2159 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2013
[34]

Del Porro, M

F. Del Porro, M. Herrero-Valea, S. Liberati, and M. Schneider, Hawking radiation in Lorentz violating gravity: a tale of two horizons, JHEP12, 094, arXiv:2310.01472 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv
[35]

Jacobson, On the origin of the outgoing black hole modes, Phys

T. Jacobson, On the origin of the outgoing black hole modes, Phys. Rev. D53, 7082 (1996), arXiv:hep-th/9601064

work page arXiv 1996
[36]

Barcel´ o, S

C. Barcel´ o, S. Liberati, S. Sonego, and M. Visser, Causal structure of analogue spacetimes, New Journal of Physics6, 186 (2004)

2004
[37]

J. R. Mu˜ noz de Nova, K. Golubkov, V. I. Kolobov, and J. Steinhauer, Observation of thermal Hawking radiation and its temperature in an analogue black hole, Nature569, 688 (2019), arXiv:1809.00913 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2019
[38]

Herrero-Valea, The status of Hoˇ rava gravity, Eur

M. Herrero-Valea, The status of Hoˇ rava gravity, Eur. Phys. J. Plus138, 968 (2023), arXiv:2307.13039 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2023
[39]

Del Porro, S

F. Del Porro, S. Liberati, and J. Mazza, Universal horizons without hypersurface orthogonality, Phys. Rev. D112, 044018 (2025), arXiv:2504.07215 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2025
[40]

V. P. Frolov, Black holes, hidden symmetry and complete integrability: Brief Review, Fundam. Theor. Phys.177, 261 (2014), arXiv:1210.7115 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2014
[41]

Barcaroli, L

L. Barcaroli, L. K. Brunkhorst, G. Gubitosi, N. Loret, and C. Pfeifer, Hamilton geometry: Phase space geometry from modified dispersion relations, Phys. Rev. D92, 084053 (2015), arXiv:1507.00922 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2015
[42]

Di Criscienzo, M

R. Di Criscienzo, M. Nadalini, L. Vanzo, S. Zerbini, and G. Zoccatelli, On the Hawking radiation as tunneling for a class of dynamical black holes, Phys. Lett. B657, 107 (2007), arXiv:0707.4425 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2007
[43]

Isoard and N

M. Isoard and N. Pavloff, Departing from thermality of analogue Hawking radiation in a Bose-Einstein condensate, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 060401 (2020), arXiv:1909.02509 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

work page arXiv 2020
[44]

Jacobson, Introduction to quantum fields in curved space-time and the Hawking effect, inSchool on Quantum Gravity (2003) pp

T. Jacobson, Introduction to quantum fields in curved space-time and the Hawking effect, inSchool on Quantum Gravity (2003) pp. 39–89, arXiv:gr-qc/0308048

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2003
[45]

Olver and W

F. Olver and W. Rheinbolt,Asymptotics and Special Functions(Academic Press, 2014)

2014
[46]

I. S. Gradshteyn and I. M. Ryzhik,Table of Integrals, Series, and Products(1943)

1943
[47]

Coutant and R

A. Coutant and R. Parentani, Hawking radiation with dispersion: The broadened horizon paradigm, Phys. Rev. D90, 121501 (2014), arXiv:1402.2514 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2014
[48]

R. G. Newton,SCATTERING THEORY OF WA VES AND PARTICLES(1982)

1982
[49]

Parentani, Hawking radiation from Feynman diagrams, Phys

R. Parentani, Hawking radiation from Feynman diagrams, Phys. Rev. D61, 027501 (2000), arXiv:gr-qc/9904024

work page arXiv 2000