Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 133 references

Toller matrices and the Feynman $i\varepsilon$ in spinfoams

T0 review · 2 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-05-08 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Toller matrices in spinfoams admit three equivalent definitions: Ruhl analyticity, the Feynman iε prescription, and a boost-eigenvalue integral whose residues recover the Wick rotation.

desk verdict The paper shows that Ruhl's analytic definition of the Toller matrices matches the iε prescription and a boost-integral residue sum that recovers the Wick rotation, with explicit hypergeometric forms for γ-simple cases. read the letter →

arxiv 2604.24945 v1 submitted 2026-04-27 gr-qc hep-thmath-phmath.MP

Eugenio Bianchi , Chaosong Chen , Mauricio Gamonal This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qchep-thmath-phmath.MP
keywords TollermatricesFeynmaniεprescriptionspinfoamsWickrotationSL(2C)representationsLorentzianquantumgravityanalyticcontinuationboostoperator
topics Quantum Gravity
open problems Quantum Gravity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper shows that the Toller matrices T^(±), which appear in causal spinfoam amplitudes for Lorentzian quantum gravity, admit three equivalent representations. Ruhl's definition using analytic properties and asymptotics is proven equivalent to the Feynman iε prescription recently used in spinfoams. An alternative integral over boost operator eigenvalues leads to a sum over residues that reproduces the Wick rotation from Euclidean to Lorentzian spinfoams. Explicit expressions using hypergeometric functions are derived and specialized to the γ-simple representations needed for spinfoams. This unification provides consistent ways to define the causal structure in the transition amplitudes.

What carries the argument

The Toller matrices T^(±), polynomially bounded functions on the Lorentz group satisfying T^(+) + T^(-) = D, whose analytic properties, iε prescription, and boost-eigenvalue integral representations carry the equivalence proofs.

What would settle it

An explicit computation of the residue sum from the boost-eigenvalue integral for a specific γ-simple representation that fails to match the result from the iε prescription.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

We study the analytic properties and three equivalent representations of the Toller matrices T^(±) which appear in the causal formulation of spinfoam transition amplitudes for 4d Lorentzian quantum gravity. These are polynomially bounded functions on the Lorentz group which satisfy the relation T^(+) + T^(-) = D, where the Wigner matrix D provides a unitary irreducible representation of SL(2,C). Ruhl's definition of T^(±) in terms of analyticity and asymptotic properties is shown to be equivalent to the recently introduced Feynman iε prescription in spinfoams. We show that, equivalently, they can be represented as an integral over eigenvalues of the boost operator, which results in a sum of

Load-bearing premise

The Toller matrices are polynomially bounded on the Lorentz group and belong to the γ-simple representations, which justifies the contour deformations and residue sums.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The Feynman iε prescription gains justification through equivalence to Ruhl's analytic definition.
  • The residue sum directly reproduces the Wick rotation connecting Euclidean Spin(4) to Lorentzian SL(2,C) spinfoams.
  • Hypergeometric expressions become available for explicit calculations in γ-simple representations.
  • Any of the three representations can be substituted into causal spinfoam transition amplitudes.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The equivalences may allow choosing the representation that best avoids singularities for numerical work on specific spinfoam amplitudes.
  • Similar analytic-integral equivalences could appear in other quantum gravity models that rely on causal prescriptions.
  • The result ties the spinfoam iε rule to standard contour techniques used in flat-space QFT propagators.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript establishes three equivalent representations for the Toller matrices T^(±) in the causal formulation of 4d Lorentzian spinfoam transition amplitudes: Ruhl's definition via analyticity and asymptotic properties, the Feynman iε prescription, and an integral over eigenvalues of the boost operator that evaluates to a sum over residues. The residue sum is shown to reproduce the Wick rotation relating Euclidean Spin(4) to Lorentzian SL(2,C) spinfoams. Explicit expressions in hypergeometric functions are derived and specialized to the γ-simple representations relevant for spinfoams, with the relation T^(+) + T^(-) = D holding for the Wigner matrix D.

Significance. If the equivalences hold under the stated assumptions, the paper supplies a rigorous analytic bridge between representation-theoretic definitions of Toller matrices and the practical iε prescription used in spinfoam models. The explicit hypergeometric forms and residue-sum representation offer concrete tools for computations and clarify the connection to Euclidean spinfoams via Wick rotation. The work relies on standard tools of representation theory and contour integration with no free parameters or ad-hoc entities, which strengthens the mathematical foundations of Lorentzian quantum gravity amplitudes.

major comments (2)
  1. [section deriving the hypergeometric expressions and the equivalence proofs] The central equivalences (Ruhl definition ↔ iε prescription ↔ boost-eigenvalue integral plus residues) rely on polynomial boundedness of T^(±) on the Lorentz group together with the γ-simple representation condition to license contour deformations and residue extraction. While the abstract and the derivations assert these properties, the manuscript does not contain an explicit asymptotic analysis of the provided hypergeometric expressions confirming that the growth remains polynomially bounded in the directions required for the deformations. If the actual growth exceeds polynomial order for any sequence of γ-simple labels, extra contributions would appear in the residue sum and the claimed equivalences would fail.
  2. [section on the boost-eigenvalue integral representation] In the derivation of the integral representation over boost eigenvalues, the contour choices and the justification for shifting contours to extract the residue sum are not specified with sufficient detail. In particular, it is unclear how the γ-simple condition alone guarantees that no additional poles or contributions arise outside the asserted polynomial boundedness.
minor comments (2)
  1. The relation T^(+) + T^(-) = D is stated but a brief reminder of the definition of the Wigner matrix D and its unitarity would improve readability for readers outside the immediate spinfoam literature.
  2. Notation for the Toller matrices T^(±) could be introduced with an explicit reference to their appearance in the causal formulation of the transition amplitudes, to make the opening paragraphs self-contained.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and for the constructive comments. We address each major point below and will incorporate the suggested clarifications and additions in a revised version.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [section deriving the hypergeometric expressions and the equivalence proofs] The central equivalences (Ruhl definition ↔ iε prescription ↔ boost-eigenvalue integral plus residues) rely on polynomial boundedness of T^(±) on the Lorentz group together with the γ-simple representation condition to license contour deformations and residue extraction. While the abstract and the derivations assert these properties, the manuscript does not contain an explicit asymptotic analysis of the provided hypergeometric expressions confirming that the growth remains polynomially bounded in the directions required for the deformations. If the actual growth exceeds polynomial order for any sequence of γ-simple labels, extra contributions would appear in the residue sum and the claimed equivalences would fail.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit asymptotic analysis of the hypergeometric expressions is needed to rigorously confirm polynomial boundedness in the directions relevant for contour deformation. Although the manuscript states that T^(±) are polynomially bounded (as required by Ruhl's definition and standard for SL(2,C) matrix elements), we did not provide a dedicated verification for the derived hypergeometric forms. In the revised manuscript we will add a short appendix containing this analysis, using the known large-boost asymptotics of hypergeometric functions for γ-simple representations and verifying that growth remains at most polynomial, thereby ensuring the contour deformations and residue sums are justified without extraneous contributions. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [section on the boost-eigenvalue integral representation] In the derivation of the integral representation over boost eigenvalues, the contour choices and the justification for shifting contours to extract the residue sum are not specified with sufficient detail. In particular, it is unclear how the γ-simple condition alone guarantees that no additional poles or contributions arise outside the asserted polynomial boundedness.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the contour choices and deformation arguments could be presented with greater explicitness. The original derivation relies on the analytic properties established via the iε prescription and the γ-simple condition to restrict the locations of poles, but the precise paths and the absence of other singularities were not spelled out step by step. In the revision we will expand the relevant section to specify the initial and deformed contours, the regions where the integrand is analytic, and how the γ-simple condition together with polynomial boundedness excludes additional poles or non-residue contributions when the contour is shifted. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: equivalences derived from analytic properties and integral representations

full rationale

The paper establishes three equivalent representations of the Toller matrices T^(±) by showing that Ruhl's analytic/asymptotic definition matches the Feynman iε prescription and an eigenvalue integral plus residue sum. These steps rely on explicit assumptions of polynomial boundedness on the Lorentz group and γ-simple representations to license contour deformations, together with hypergeometric formulae after specialization. No step reduces a claimed result to a fitted parameter, self-definition, or load-bearing self-citation chain; the central equivalences remain independent of the inputs once the growth and representation conditions are granted. References to prior spinfoam literature provide context but do not substitute for the derivations performed here.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The work rests on standard properties of unitary irreducible representations of SL(2,C) and polynomial boundedness; no new free parameters, ad-hoc axioms, or invented entities are introduced beyond the Toller matrices themselves, which are defined by the equivalences shown.

assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption Toller matrices are polynomially bounded functions on the Lorentz group satisfying T^(+) + T^(-) = D where D is a Wigner matrix for an irreducible representation of SL(2,C).
    Stated in the abstract as the starting point for the analytic properties studied.
  • standard math Standard contour integration and residue calculus apply to the integral representation over boost eigenvalues.
    Invoked to obtain the sum over residues that reproduces the Wick rotation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Toller matrices and the Feynman $i\varepsilon$ in spinfoams." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2604.24945

@misc{pith2026260424945,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Toller matrices and the Feynman $i\varepsilon$ in spinfoams},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2604.24945}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2604.24945}
}
abstract

We study the analytic properties and three equivalent representations of the Toller matrices $T^{(\pm)}$ which appear in the causal formulation of spinfoam transition amplitudes for 4d Lorentzian quantum gravity. These are polynomially bounded functions on the Lorentz group which satisfy the relation $T^{(+)}+T^{(-)}=D$, where the Wigner matrix $D$ provides a unitary irreducible representation of $SL(2,C)$. Ruhl's definition of $T^{(\pm)}$ in terms of analyticity and asymptotic properties is shown to be equivalent to the recently introduced Feynman $i\varepsilon$ prescription in spinfoams. We show that, equivalently, they can be represented as an integral over eigenvalues of the boost operator, which results in a sum over residues. The latter reproduces the Wick rotation relating Euclidean $Spin(4)$ to Lorentzian $SL(2,C)$ spinfoams studied by Dona, Gozzini and Nicotra. We provide explicit expressions in terms of hypergeometric functions and specialize them to the $\gamma$-simple representations relevant for spinfoams.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.24945 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Outline of the paper: Equivalent representations of view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Feynman view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Analytic structure of the integrand in ( view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

133 extracted references · 133 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    (See also [41]), and are reported explicitly in (B7). By inserting the resolution of the identity (27) into the definition of the reduced Wignerd-matrix, we can write d(ρ,k) jlm (β) =D (ρ,k) jmlm(e βσz 2 ) =⟨j m|e −iβ ˆKz |l m⟩ = Z ∞ −∞ dω⟨j m|e −iβKz |ω m⟩ ⟨ω m|l m⟩ = Z ∞ −∞ dωe −iβω ⟨ω m|j m⟩ ⟨ω m|l m⟩.(28) 5 The overlap coefficients⟨ω m|j m⟩have four f...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Coefficient-level continuation and compact-support thresholds TheWickrotationusedinthemaintextisimplementedonthetwoequivalentEuclideanClebsch-Gordanexpansions of the Biedenharn-Dolginov function as d(p,q) L jlm(t) = 2jLX n=0 eit(2n−2jL−m) C jm jL(n−jL)j R(m−n+jL) C lm jL(n−jL)j R(m−n+jL) ,(C20) d(p,q) R jlm(t) = 2jRX r=0 eit(m−2jR+2r) C jm jL(m−jR+r)j R(j...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Inverse Wick rotation The coefficient-level Wick rotation can be inverted, branch by branch. The inverse maps on the representation labels are W −1 + :ρ→ −ip , k→q , β→ −it ,(C28) W −1 − :ρ→+ip , k→ −q , β→ −it .(C29) Under these maps, the Lorentzian infinite sums truncate by the compactSU(2)support conditions. Before removing the convention factors, one ...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Rühl,The Lorentz Group and Harmonic Analysis, Mathematical physics monograph series, W

    W. Rühl,The Lorentz Group and Harmonic Analysis, Mathematical physics monograph series, W. A. Benjamin (1970)

    work page 1970

  5. [5]

    Martin-Dussaud,A Primer of Group Theory for Loop Quantum Gravity and Spin-foams,Gen

    P. Martin-Dussaud,A Primer of Group Theory for Loop Quantum Gravity and Spin-foams,Gen. Rel. Grav.51110 (2019) [arXiv:1902.08439]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2019

  6. [6]

    Rovelli and F

    C. Rovelli and F. Vidotto,Covariant Loop Quantum Gravity, Cambridge University Press (2014), DOI

    work page 2014

  7. [7]

    Ashtekar and E

    A. Ashtekar and E. Bianchi,A short review of Loop Quantum Gravity,Rept. Prog. Phys.84042001 (2021) [arXiv:2104.04394]

    work page arXiv 2021

  8. [8]

    LQG vertex with finite Immirzi parameter

    J. Engle, E. Livine, R. Pereira and C. Rovelli,LQG vertex with finite Immirzi parameter,Nucl. Phys. B 799136 (2008) [arXiv:0711.0146]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2008

Show all 133 references
  1. [9]

    Bianchi, C

    E. Bianchi, C. Chen and M. Gamonal,Causal spinfoam vertex for 4d Lorentzian quantum gravity, [arXiv:2601.23162]

  2. [10]

    Livine and D

    E.R. Livine and D. Oriti,Implementing causality in the spin foam quantum geometry,Nucl. Phys. B663 231 (2003) [arXiv:gr-qc/0210064]

    2003

  3. [11]

    Oriti,The Feynman propagator for spin foam quantum gravity,Phys

    D. Oriti,The Feynman propagator for spin foam quantum gravity,Phys. Rev. Lett.94111301 (2005) [arXiv:gr-qc/0410134]

    2005

  4. [12]

    Bianchi and P

    E. Bianchi and P. Martin-Dussaud,Causal Structure in Spin Foams,Universe10181 (2024) [arXiv:2109.00986]

    2024 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Reisenberger and C

    M.P. Reisenberger and C. Rovelli,’Sum over surfaces’ form of loop quantum gravity,Phys. Rev. D563490 (1997) [arXiv:gr-qc/9612035]

    1997

  6. [14]

    Markopoulou and L

    F. Markopoulou and L. Smolin,Causal evolution of spin networks,Nucl. Phys. B508409 (1997) [arXiv:gr-qc/9702025]

    1997

  7. [15]

    Markopoulou and L

    F. Markopoulou and L. Smolin,Quantum geometry with intrinsic local causality,Phys. Rev. D58084032 (1998) [arXiv:gr-qc/9712067]

    1998

  8. [16]

    Markopoulou,Quantum causal histories,Class

    F. Markopoulou,Quantum causal histories,Class. Quant. Grav.172059 (2000) [arXiv:hep-th/9904009]

    2000

  9. [17]

    Gupta,Causality in spin foam models,Phys

    S. Gupta,Causality in spin foam models,Phys. Rev. D 61064014 (2000) [arXiv:gr-qc/9908018]

    2000

  10. [18]

    Pfeiffer,On the causal Barrett-Crane model: Measure, coupling constant, Wick rotation, symmetries and observables,Phys

    H. Pfeiffer,On the causal Barrett-Crane model: Measure, coupling constant, Wick rotation, symmetries and observables,Phys. Rev. D67064022 (2003) [arXiv:gr-qc/0212049]

    2003

  11. [19]

    Hawkins, F

    E. Hawkins, F. Markopoulou and H. Sahlmann, Evolution in quantum causal histories,Class. Quant. Grav.203839 (2003) [arXiv:hep-th/0302111]

    2003

  12. [20]

    Freidel and E.R

    L. Freidel and E.R. Livine,Ponzano-Regge model revisited III: Feynman diagrams and effective field theory,Class. Quant. Grav.232021 (2006) [arXiv:hep-th/0502106]

    2006

  13. [21]

    Oriti,Generalised group field theories and quantum gravity transition amplitudes,Phys

    D. Oriti,Generalised group field theories and quantum gravity transition amplitudes,Phys. Rev. D73061502 (2006) [arXiv:gr-qc/0512069]

    2006

  14. [22]

    Oriti and T

    D. Oriti and T. Tlas,Causality and matter propagation in 3-D spin foam quantum gravity,Phys. Rev. D74 104021 (2006) [arXiv:gr-qc/0608116]

    2006

  15. [23]

    Livine and D.R

    E.R. Livine and D.R. Terno,Quantum causal histories in the light of quantum information,Phys. Rev. D75 084001 (2007) [arXiv:gr-qc/0611135]

    2007

  16. [24]

    Rovelli and E

    C. Rovelli and E. Wilson-Ewing,Discrete Symmetries in Covariant LQG,Phys. Rev. D86064002 (2012) [arXiv:1205.0733]

    2012

  17. [25]

    Bianchi and F

    E. Bianchi and F. Hellmann,The Construction of Spin Foam Vertex Amplitudes,SIGMA9008 (2013) [arXiv:1207.4596]

    2013

  18. [26]

    Oriti,Group field theory as the 2nd quantization of Loop Quantum Gravity,Class

    D. Oriti,Group field theory as the 2nd quantization of Loop Quantum Gravity,Class. Quant. Grav.33 085005 (2016) [arXiv:1310.7786]

    2016

  19. [27]

    Immirzi,A note on the spinor construction of Spin Foam amplitudes,Class

    G. Immirzi,A note on the spinor construction of Spin Foam amplitudes,Class. Quant. Grav.31095016 (2014) [arXiv:1311.6942]

    2014

  20. [28]

    Cortês and L

    M. Cortês and L. Smolin,Spin foam models as energetic causal sets,Phys. Rev. D93084039 (2016) [arXiv:1407.0032]

    2016

  21. [29]

    Wieland,A new action for simplicial gravity in four dimensions,Class

    W.M. Wieland,A new action for simplicial gravity in four dimensions,Class. Quant. Grav.32015016 (2015) [arXiv:1407.0025]

    2015

  22. [30]

    Immirzi,Causal spin foams, [arXiv:1610.04462]

    G. Immirzi,Causal spin foams, [arXiv:1610.04462]

  23. [31]

    Finocchiaro and D

    M. Finocchiaro and D. Oriti,Spin foam models and the Duflo map,Class. Quant. Grav.37015010 (2020) [arXiv:1812.03550]

    2020

  24. [32]

    Jercher, D

    A.F. Jercher, D. Oriti and A.G.A. Pithis,Complete Barrett-Crane model and its causal structure,Phys. Rev. D106066019 (2022) [arXiv:2206.15442]

    2022

  25. [33]

    Jercher, J.D

    A.F. Jercher, J.D. Simão and S. Steinhaus,Partial absence of cosine problem in 3D Lorentzian spin foams,Class. Quant. Grav.42017001 (2025) [arXiv:2404.16943]

    2025

  26. [34]

    Simão,A new 2+1 coherent spin-foam vertex for quantum gravity,Class

    J.D. Simão,A new 2+1 coherent spin-foam vertex for quantum gravity,Class. Quant. Grav.41195015 (2024) [arXiv:2402.05993]

    2024

  27. [35]

    Oriti,Quantum information elements in Quantum Gravity states and processes, [arXiv:2502.21234]

    D. Oriti,Quantum information elements in Quantum Gravity states and processes, [arXiv:2502.21234]

  28. [36]

    Asante and B

    S.K. Asante and B. Borgolte,Causal structure and topology change in (2+1)-dimensional simplicial gravity,Phys. Rev. D112126001 (2025) 20 [arXiv:2507.10697]

    2025

  29. [37]

    Beltrán,Causal Structure for Generalized Spinfoams, [arXiv:2603.22661]

    C.E. Beltrán,Causal Structure for Generalized Spinfoams, [arXiv:2603.22661]

  30. [38]

    Toller,On the group-theoretical approach to complex angular momentum and signature,Nuovo Cim

    M. Toller,On the group-theoretical approach to complex angular momentum and signature,Nuovo Cim. A54295 (1968)

    1968

  31. [39]

    Toller,An expansion of the scattering amplitude at vanishing four-momentum transfer using the representations of the Lorentz group,Nuovo Cim

    M. Toller,An expansion of the scattering amplitude at vanishing four-momentum transfer using the representations of the Lorentz group,Nuovo Cim. A53 671 (1968)

    1968

  32. [40]

    Sciarrino and M

    A. Sciarrino and M. Toller,Decomposition of the unitary irreducible representations of the group SL(2C) restricted to the subgroup SU(1, 1),Journal of Mathematical Physics81252 (1967)

    1967

  33. [41]

    P. Donà, F. Gozzini and A. Nicotra,Wick rotation for spin foam quantum gravity,Phys. Rev. D104126008 (2021) [arXiv:2106.14672]

    2021

  34. [42]

    Speziale,Boosting Wigner’s nj-symbols,J

    S. Speziale,Boosting Wigner’s nj-symbols,J. Math. Phys.58032501 (2017) [arXiv:1609.01632]

    2017

  35. [43]

    Huszár,Angular momentum and unitary spinor bases of the Lorentz group,Acta Phys

    M. Huszár,Angular momentum and unitary spinor bases of the Lorentz group,Acta Phys. Hung.30241 (1971)

    1971

  36. [44]

    Rashid,Boost Matrix Elements of the Homogeneous Lorentz groups,J

    M.A. Rashid,Boost Matrix Elements of the Homogeneous Lorentz groups,J. Math. Phys.201514 (1979)

    1979

  37. [45]

    Biedenharn,Wigner Coefficients for the R4 Group and Some Applications,J

    L.C. Biedenharn,Wigner Coefficients for the R4 Group and Some Applications,J. Math. Phys.2433 (1961)

    1961

  38. [46]

    Barut and R

    A.O. Barut and R. Wilson,Some New Identities of Clebsch-Gordan Coefficients and Representation Functions of SO(2,1) and SO(4),J. Math. Phys.17 900 (1976)

    1976

  39. [47]

    Lorente and P.D

    M. Lorente and P.D. Kramer,Tensor and spin representations of SO(4) and discrete quantum gravity, in8th International Symposium Symmetries in Science, 10, 2003, DOI [arXiv:gr-qc/0402050]

    2003

  40. [48]

    Barrett and L

    J.W. Barrett and L. Crane,A Lorentzian signature model for quantum general relativity,Class. Quant. Grav.173101 (2000) [arXiv:gr-qc/9904025]

    2000

  41. [49]

    Barrett, R.J

    J.W. Barrett, R.J. Dowdall, W.J. Fairbairn, H. Gomes and F. Hellmann,Asymptotic analysis of the EPRL four-simplex amplitude,J. Math. Phys.50112504 (2009) [arXiv:0902.1170]

    2009

  42. [50]

    Barrett, R.J

    J.W. Barrett, R.J. Dowdall, W.J. Fairbairn, F. Hellmann and R. Pereira,Lorentzian spin foam amplitudes: Graphical calculus and asymptotics,Class. Quant. Grav.27165009 (2010) [arXiv:0907.2440]

    2010

  43. [51]

    Han,On Spinfoam Models in Large Spin Regime, Class

    M. Han,On Spinfoam Models in Large Spin Regime, Class. Quant. Grav.31015004 (2014) [arXiv:1304.5627]

    2014

  44. [52]

    P. Dona, M. Fanizza, P. Martin-Dussaud and S. Speziale,Asymptotics ofSL(2,C)coherent invariant tensors,Commun. Math. Phys.389399 (2022) [arXiv:2011.13909]

    2022

  45. [53]

    Dona and S

    P. Dona and S. Speziale,Asymptotics of lowest unitary SL(2,C) invariants on graphs,Phys. Rev. D102 086016 (2020) [arXiv:2007.09089]

    2020

  46. [54]

    Dona,Geometry from local flatness in Lorentzian spin foam theories,Phys

    P. Dona,Geometry from local flatness in Lorentzian spin foam theories,Phys. Rev. D107066011 (2023) [arXiv:2211.04743]

    2023

  47. [55]

    M. Han, Z. Huang, H. Liu and D. Qu,Numerical computations of next-to-leading order corrections in spinfoam large-jasymptotics,Phys. Rev. D102 124010 (2020) [arXiv:2007.01998]

    2020

  48. [56]

    Han and H

    M. Han and H. Liu,Analytic continuation of spinfoam models,Phys. Rev. D105024012 (2022) [arXiv:2104.06902]

    2022

  49. [57]

    Bianchi,Entropy of Non-Extremal Black Holes from Loop Gravity, [arXiv:1204.5122]

    E. Bianchi,Entropy of Non-Extremal Black Holes from Loop Gravity, [arXiv:1204.5122]

  50. [58]

    Bianchi and R.C

    E. Bianchi and R.C. Myers,On the Architecture of Spacetime Geometry,Class. Quant. Grav.31214002 (2014) [arXiv:1212.5183]

    2014

  51. [59]

    Geiller and K

    M. Geiller and K. Noui,Near-Horizon Radiation and Self-Dual Loop Quantum Gravity,EPL10560001 (2014) [arXiv:1402.4138]

    2014

  52. [60]

    Rovelli,Graviton propagator from background-independent quantum gravity,Phys

    C. Rovelli,Graviton propagator from background-independent quantum gravity,Phys. Rev. Lett.97151301 (2006) [arXiv:gr-qc/0508124]

    2006

  53. [61]

    Bianchi, L

    E. Bianchi, L. Modesto, C. Rovelli and S. Speziale, Graviton propagator in loop quantum gravity,Class. Quant. Grav.236989 (2006) [arXiv:gr-qc/0604044]

    2006

  54. [62]

    Bianchi, E

    E. Bianchi, E. Magliaro and C. Perini,LQG propagator from the new spin foams,Nucl. Phys. B 822245 (2009) [arXiv:0905.4082]

    2009

  55. [63]

    Bianchi and Y

    E. Bianchi and Y. Ding,Lorentzian spinfoam propagator,Phys. Rev. D86104040 (2012) [arXiv:1109.6538]

    2012

  56. [64]

    Vidotto,Spinfoam Cosmology: quantum cosmology from the full theory,J

    F. Vidotto,Spinfoam Cosmology: quantum cosmology from the full theory,J. Phys. Conf. Ser.314012049 (2011) [arXiv:1011.4705]

    2011

  57. [65]

    Bianchi, C

    E. Bianchi, C. Rovelli and F. Vidotto,Towards Spinfoam Cosmology,Phys. Rev. D82084035 (2010) [arXiv:1003.3483]

    2010

  58. [66]

    Roken,First-order quantum-gravitational correction from covariant, holomorphic spinfoam cosmology,Int

    C. Roken,First-order quantum-gravitational correction from covariant, holomorphic spinfoam cosmology,Int. J. Mod. Phys. D221350005 (2015) [arXiv:1011.3335]

    2015

  59. [67]

    Henderson, C

    A. Henderson, C. Rovelli, F. Vidotto and E. Wilson-Ewing,Local spinfoam expansion in loop quantum cosmology,Class. Quant. Grav.28025003 (2011) [arXiv:1010.0502]

    2011

  60. [68]

    Bianchi, T

    E. Bianchi, T. Krajewski, C. Rovelli and F. Vidotto, Cosmological constant in spinfoam cosmology,Phys. Rev. D83104015 (2011) [arXiv:1101.4049]

    2011

  61. [69]

    Livine and M

    E.R. Livine and M. Martin-Benito,Classical Setting and Effective Dynamics for Spinfoam Cosmology, Class. Quant. Grav.30035006 (2013) [arXiv:1111.2867]

    2013

  62. [70]

    Rennert and D

    J. Rennert and D. Sloan,Anisotropic Spinfoam Cosmology,Class. Quant. Grav.31015017 (2014) [arXiv:1308.0687]

    2014

  63. [71]

    Rennert and D

    J. Rennert and D. Sloan,A Homogeneous Model of Spinfoam Cosmology,Class. Quant. Grav.30235019 (2013) [arXiv:1304.6688]

    2013

  64. [72]

    Vilensky,Spinfoam cosmology with the proper vertex amplitude,Class

    I. Vilensky,Spinfoam cosmology with the proper vertex amplitude,Class. Quant. Grav.34225015 (2017) [arXiv:1611.01508]

    2017

  65. [73]

    Kisielowski and J

    M. Kisielowski and J. Lewandowski,Spin-foam model for gravity coupled to massless scalar field,Class. Quant. Grav.36075006 (2019) [arXiv:1807.06098]

    2019

  66. [74]

    Gozzini and F

    F. Gozzini and F. Vidotto,Primordial Fluctuations From Quantum Gravity,Front. Astron. Astrophys. Cosmol.7629466 (2021) [arXiv:1906.02211]

    2021

  67. [75]

    Frisoni, F

    P. Frisoni, F. Gozzini and F. Vidotto,Markov chain Monte Carlo methods for graph refinement in spinfoam cosmology,Class. Quant. Grav.40105001 (2023) [arXiv:2207.02881]

    2023

  68. [76]

    Frisoni, F

    P. Frisoni, F. Gozzini and F. Vidotto,Primordial fluctuations from quantum gravity: 16-cell topological model, [arXiv:2312.02399]. 21

  69. [77]

    M. Han, H. Liu, D. Qu, F. Vidotto and C. Zhang, Cosmological dynamics from covariant loop quantum gravity with scalar matter,Phys. Rev. D111086012 (2025) [arXiv:2402.07984]

    2025

  70. [78]

    Bianchi and M

    E. Bianchi and M. Rincon-Ramirez,Spinfoams, γ-duality and parity violation in primordial gravitational waves, [arXiv:2403.06053]

    arXiv

  71. [79]

    Haggard and C

    H.M. Haggard and C. Rovelli,Quantum-gravity effects outside the horizon spark black to white hole tunneling, Phys. Rev. D92104020 (2015) [arXiv:1407.0989]

    2015

  72. [80]

    Christodoulou, C

    M. Christodoulou, C. Rovelli, S. Speziale and I. Vilensky,Planck star tunneling time: An astrophysically relevant observable from background-free quantum gravity,Phys. Rev. D94 084035 (2016) [arXiv:1605.05268]

    2016

  73. [81]

    Christodoulou and F

    M. Christodoulou and F. D’Ambrosio,Characteristic time scales for the geometry transition of a black hole to a white hole from spinfoams,Class. Quant. Grav. 41195030 (2024) [arXiv:1801.03027]

    2024

  74. [82]

    Bianchi, M

    E. Bianchi, M. Christodoulou, F. D’Ambrosio, H.M. Haggard and C. Rovelli,White Holes as Remnants: A Surprising Scenario for the End of a Black Hole,Class. Quant. Grav.35225003 (2018) [arXiv:1802.04264]

    2018

  75. [83]

    D’Ambrosio, M

    F. D’Ambrosio, M. Christodoulou, P. Martin-Dussaud, C. Rovelli and F. Soltani,End of a black hole’s evaporation,Phys. Rev. D103106014 (2021) [arXiv:2009.05016]

    2021

  76. [84]

    Soltani, C

    F. Soltani, C. Rovelli and P. Martin-Dussaud,End of a black hole’s evaporation. II.,Phys. Rev. D104066015 (2021) [arXiv:2105.06876]

    2021

  77. [85]

    Christodoulou, F

    M. Christodoulou, F. D’Ambrosio and C. Theofilis, Geometry transition in spinfoams,Class. Quant. Grav. 41195029 (2024) [arXiv:2302.12622]

    2024

  78. [86]

    Frisoni,Numerical approach to the black-to-white hole transition,Phys

    P. Frisoni,Numerical approach to the black-to-white hole transition,Phys. Rev. D107126012 (2023) [arXiv:2304.02691]

    2023

  79. [87]

    Dona, H.M

    P. Dona, H.M. Haggard, C. Rovelli and F. Vidotto, Tunneling of quantum geometries in spinfoams,Phys. Rev. D109106016 (2024) [arXiv:2402.09038]

    2024

  80. [88]

    Rovelli and F

    C. Rovelli and F. Vidotto,Planck stars, White Holes, Remnants and Planck-mass quasi-particles. The quantum gravity phase in black holes’ evolution and its manifestations, [arXiv:2407.09584]

  81. [89]

    M. Han, D. Qu and C. Zhang,Spin foam amplitude of the black-to-white hole transition,Phys. Rev. D110 124055 (2024) [arXiv:2404.02796]

    2024

  82. [90]

    Donà, H.M

    P. Donà, H.M. Haggard, C. Rovelli, G. Sreeram and J. Taddei,Spinfoam tunneling of quantum geometries in angle variables,Phys. Rev. D112104004 (2025) [arXiv:2507.16633]

    2025

  83. [91]

    P. Dona, M. Han and H. Liu,Spinfoams and High-Performance Computing, inHandbook of Quantum Gravity, C. Bambi, L. Modesto and I. Shapiro, eds., pp. 1–38 (2023), DOI [arXiv:2212.14396]

    2023

  84. [92]

    Dona and G

    P. Dona and G. Sarno,Numerical methods for EPRL spin foam transition amplitudes and Lorentzian recoupling theory,Gen. Rel. Grav.50127 (2018) [arXiv:1807.03066]

    2018

  85. [93]

    P. Donà, M. Fanizza, G. Sarno and S. Speziale, Numerical study of the Lorentzian Engle-Pereira-Rovelli-Livine spin foam amplitude, Phys. Rev. D100106003 (2019) [arXiv:1903.12624]

    2019

  86. [94]

    P. Donà, F. Gozzini and G. Sarno,Numerical analysis of spin foam dynamics and the flatness problem,Phys. Rev. D102106003 (2020) [arXiv:2004.12911]

    2020

  87. [95]

    Gozzini,A high-performance code for EPRL spin foam amplitudes,Class

    F. Gozzini,A high-performance code for EPRL spin foam amplitudes,Class. Quant. Grav.38225010 (2021) [arXiv:2107.13952]

    2021

  88. [96]

    Dona and P

    P. Dona and P. Frisoni,How-to Compute EPRL Spin Foam Amplitudes,Universe8208 (2022) [arXiv:2202.04360]

    2022

  89. [97]

    Collet,A (simple) expression of the unitary-irreducible SL(2,C) representations as a finite sum of exponentials,Unpublished(2018)

    F. Collet,A (simple) expression of the unitary-irreducible SL(2,C) representations as a finite sum of exponentials,Unpublished(2018)

    2018

  90. [98]

    Ashtekar,New Variables for Classical and Quantum Gravity,Phys

    A. Ashtekar,New Variables for Classical and Quantum Gravity,Phys. Rev. Lett.572244 (1986)

    1986

  91. [99]

    Ashtekar,New Hamiltonian Formulation of General Relativity,Phys

    A. Ashtekar,New Hamiltonian Formulation of General Relativity,Phys. Rev. D361587 (1987)

    1987

  92. [100]

    Ashtekar,Lectures on nonperturbative canonical gravity, vol

    A. Ashtekar,Lectures on nonperturbative canonical gravity, vol. 6 (1991), DOI

    1991

  93. [101]

    Ashtekar, C

    A. Ashtekar, C. Rovelli and L. Smolin,Selfduality and quantization,J. Geom. Phys.87 (1992) [arXiv:hep-th/9202079]

    1992

  94. [102]

    Barbero G.,Real Ashtekar variables for Lorentzian signature space times,Phys

    J.F. Barbero G.,Real Ashtekar variables for Lorentzian signature space times,Phys. Rev. D51 5507 (1995) [arXiv:gr-qc/9410014]

    1995

  95. [103]

    Immirzi,Real and complex connections for canonical gravity,Class

    G. Immirzi,Real and complex connections for canonical gravity,Class. Quant. Grav.14L177 (1997) [arXiv:gr-qc/9612030]

    1997

  96. [104]

    Thiemann,Reality conditions inducing transforms for quantum gauge field theory and quantum gravity, Class

    T. Thiemann,Reality conditions inducing transforms for quantum gauge field theory and quantum gravity, Class. Quant. Grav.131383 (1996) [arXiv:gr-qc/9511057]

    1996

  97. [105]

    Ashtekar,A Generalized Wick transform for gravity, Phys

    A. Ashtekar,A Generalized Wick transform for gravity, Phys. Rev. D532865 (1996) [arXiv:gr-qc/9511083]

    1996

  98. [106]

    Rovelli,Loop quantum gravity,Living Rev

    C. Rovelli,Loop quantum gravity,Living Rev. Rel.11 (1998) [arXiv:gr-qc/9710008]

    1998

  99. [107]

    Wieland,Complex Ashtekar variables and reality conditions for Holst’s action,Annales Henri Poincare 13425 (2012) [arXiv:1012.1738]

    W. Wieland,Complex Ashtekar variables and reality conditions for Holst’s action,Annales Henri Poincare 13425 (2012) [arXiv:1012.1738]

    2012

  100. [108]

    Wieland,Twistorial phase space for complex Ashtekar variables,Class

    W.M. Wieland,Twistorial phase space for complex Ashtekar variables,Class. Quant. Grav.29045007 (2012) [arXiv:1107.5002]

    2012

  101. [109]

    Frodden, M

    E. Frodden, M. Geiller, K. Noui and A. Perez,Black Hole Entropy from complex Ashtekar variables,EPL 10710005 (2014) [arXiv:1212.4060]

    2014

  102. [110]

    Ben Achour, A

    J. Ben Achour, A. Mouchet and K. Noui,Analytic Continuation of Black Hole Entropy in Loop Quantum Gravity,JHEP06145 (2015) [arXiv:1406.6021]

    2015

  103. [111]

    Ben Achour, J

    J. Ben Achour, J. Grain and K. Noui,Loop Quantum Cosmology with Complex Ashtekar Variables,Class. Quant. Grav.32025011 (2015) [arXiv:1407.3768]

    2015

  104. [112]

    Wilson-Ewing,Loop quantum cosmology with self-dual variables,Phys

    E. Wilson-Ewing,Loop quantum cosmology with self-dual variables,Phys. Rev. D92123536 (2015) [arXiv:1503.07855]

    2015

  105. [113]

    Ben Achour, K

    J. Ben Achour, K. Noui and A. Perez,Analytic continuation of the rotating black hole state counting, JHEP08149 (2016) [arXiv:1607.02380]

    2016

  106. [114]

    Ben Achour and S

    J. Ben Achour and S. Brahma,Covariance in self dual inhomogeneous models of effective quantum geometry: Spherical symmetry and Gowdy systems,Phys. Rev. D 97126003 (2018) [arXiv:1712.03677]

    2018

  107. [115]

    Varadarajan,From Euclidean to Lorentzian Loop Quantum Gravity via a Positive Complexifier,Class

    M. Varadarajan,From Euclidean to Lorentzian Loop Quantum Gravity via a Positive Complexifier,Class. Quant. Grav.36015016 (2019) [arXiv:1808.00673]

    2019

  108. [116]

    Eder and H

    K. Eder and H. Sahlmann,Supersymmetric 22 minisuperspace models in self-dual loop quantum cosmology,JHEP21064 (2020) [arXiv:2010.15629]

    2020

  109. [117]

    Ashtekar and M

    A. Ashtekar and M. Varadarajan,Gravitational Dynamics—A Novel Shift in the Hamiltonian Paradigm,Universe713 (2021) [arXiv:2012.12094]

    2021

  110. [118]

    Eder and H

    K. Eder and H. Sahlmann,Toward black hole entropy in chiral loop quantum supergravity,Phys. Rev. D106 026001 (2022) [arXiv:2204.01661]

    2022

  111. [119]

    Eder and H

    K. Eder and H. Sahlmann,Chiral Loop Quantum Supergravity and Black Hole Entropy,Universe9303 (2023) [arXiv:2208.02768]

    2023

  112. [120]

    Alexander, G

    S. Alexander, G. Herczeg and L. Freidel,An inner product for 4D quantum gravity and the Chern–Simons–Kodama state,Class. Quant. Grav.40 145010 (2023) [arXiv:2212.07446]

    2023

  113. [121]

    Wieland,Simplicial graviton from selfdual Ashtekar variables,Class

    W. Wieland,Simplicial graviton from selfdual Ashtekar variables,Class. Quant. Grav.41015027 (2024) [arXiv:2305.01803]

    2024

  114. [122]

    Sahlmann and R

    H. Sahlmann and R. Seeger,Revisiting loop quantum gravity with selfdual variables: classical theory,Class. Quant. Grav.41075010 (2024) [arXiv:2310.19729]

    2024

  115. [123]

    Sahlmann and R

    H. Sahlmann and R. Seeger,Revisiting loop quantum gravity with selfdual variables: Hilbert space and first reality condition,Class. Quant. Grav.41075011 (2024) [arXiv:2310.19722]

    2024

  116. [124]

    Delbourgo, K

    R. Delbourgo, K. Koller and P. Mahanta,On transformations between SL(2,C) representations, Nuovo Cim.521254 (1967)

    1967

  117. [125]

    Freedman and J.-M

    D.Z. Freedman and J.-M. Wang,O(4) Symmetry and Regge-Pole Theory,Phys. Rev.1601560 (1967)

    1967

  118. [126]

    Dao and V.H

    V.D. Dao and V.H. Nguyen,On the theory of unitary representations of the SL(2C) group,Acta Phys. Hung. 22201 (1967)

    1967

  119. [127]

    Bitar and G.L

    K.M. Bitar and G.L. Tindle,Daughters, conspiracies, and Lorentz symmetry,Phys. Rev.1751835 (1968)

    1968

  120. [128]

    Nakanishi,Proof of the factorizability theorem conjectured by sciarrino and toller,Prog

    N. Nakanishi,Proof of the factorizability theorem conjectured by sciarrino and toller,Prog. Theor. Phys. 401137 (1968)

    1968

  121. [129]

    Smorodinsky and M

    Y.A. Smorodinsky and M. Huszar,Representations of the lorentz group and the generalization of helicity states,Teor. Mat. Fiz.4328 (1970)

    1970

  122. [130]

    Smorodinskii and M

    Y.A. Smorodinskii and M. Huszar,Unitary representations of the Lorentz group,Sov. J. Nucl. Phys.3111 (1972)

    1972

  123. [131]

    Brower, C.E

    R.C. Brower, C.E. DeTar and J.H. Weis,Regge Theory for Multiparticle Amplitudes,Phys. Rept.14257 (1974)

    1974

  124. [132]

    Browne and D

    S. Browne and D. Sijacki,On the Irreducible Representations of the Lorentz Group,Annals Phys.99 92 (1976)

    1976

  125. [133]

    Conrady and J

    F. Conrady and J. Hnybida,Unitary irreducible representations of SL(2,C) in discrete and continuous SU(1,1) bases,J. Math. Phys.52012501 (2011) [arXiv:1007.0937]

    2011

Pith tools

Reviewed May 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.