arxiv: 2604.24945 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-27 · 🌀 gr-qc · hep-th· math-ph· math.MP

Recognition: unknown

Toller matrices and the Feynman ivarepsilon in spinfoams

Eugenio Bianchi , Chaosong Chen , Mauricio Gamonal

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 01:49 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc hep-thmath-phmath.MP

keywords Toller matricesFeynman iε prescriptionspinfoamsWick rotationSL(2,C) representationsLorentzian quantum gravityanalytic continuationboost operator

0 comments

The pith

Toller matrices in spinfoams admit three equivalent definitions: Ruhl analyticity, the Feynman iε prescription, and a boost-eigenvalue integral whose residues recover the Wick rotation.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that the Toller matrices T^(±), which appear in causal spinfoam amplitudes for Lorentzian quantum gravity, admit three equivalent representations. Ruhl's definition using analytic properties and asymptotics is proven equivalent to the Feynman iε prescription recently used in spinfoams. An alternative integral over boost operator eigenvalues leads to a sum over residues that reproduces the Wick rotation from Euclidean to Lorentzian spinfoams. Explicit expressions using hypergeometric functions are derived and specialized to the γ-simple representations needed for spinfoams. This unification provides consistent ways to define the causal structure in the transition amplitudes.

Core claim

We study the analytic properties and three equivalent representations of the Toller matrices T^(±) which appear in the causal formulation of spinfoam transition amplitudes for 4d Lorentzian quantum gravity. These are polynomially bounded functions on the Lorentz group which satisfy the relation T^(+) + T^(-) = D, where the Wigner matrix D provides a unitary irreducible representation of SL(2,C). Ruhl's definition of T^(±) in terms of analyticity and asymptotic properties is shown to be equivalent to the recently introduced Feynman iε prescription in spinfoams. We show that, equivalently, they can be represented as an integral over eigenvalues of the boost operator, which results in a sum of

What carries the argument

The Toller matrices T^(±), polynomially bounded functions on the Lorentz group satisfying T^(+) + T^(-) = D, whose analytic properties, iε prescription, and boost-eigenvalue integral representations carry the equivalence proofs.

If this is right

The Feynman iε prescription gains justification through equivalence to Ruhl's analytic definition.
The residue sum directly reproduces the Wick rotation connecting Euclidean Spin(4) to Lorentzian SL(2,C) spinfoams.
Hypergeometric expressions become available for explicit calculations in γ-simple representations.
Any of the three representations can be substituted into causal spinfoam transition amplitudes.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The equivalences may allow choosing the representation that best avoids singularities for numerical work on specific spinfoam amplitudes.
Similar analytic-integral equivalences could appear in other quantum gravity models that rely on causal prescriptions.
The result ties the spinfoam iε rule to standard contour techniques used in flat-space QFT propagators.

Load-bearing premise

The Toller matrices are polynomially bounded on the Lorentz group and belong to the γ-simple representations, which justifies the contour deformations and residue sums.

What would settle it

An explicit computation of the residue sum from the boost-eigenvalue integral for a specific γ-simple representation that fails to match the result from the iε prescription.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.24945 by Chaosong Chen, Eugenio Bianchi, Mauricio Gamonal.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: FIG. 1. Outline of the paper: Equivalent representations of view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. Feynman view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3. Analytic structure of the integrand in ( view at source ↗

read the original abstract

We study the analytic properties and three equivalent representations of the Toller matrices $T^{(\pm)}$ which appear in the causal formulation of spinfoam transition amplitudes for 4d Lorentzian quantum gravity. These are polynomially bounded functions on the Lorentz group which satisfy the relation $T^{(+)}+T^{(-)}=D$, where the Wigner matrix $D$ provides a unitary irreducible representation of $SL(2,C)$. Ruhl's definition of $T^{(\pm)}$ in terms of analyticity and asymptotic properties is shown to be equivalent to the recently introduced Feynman $i\varepsilon$ prescription in spinfoams. We show that, equivalently, they can be represented as an integral over eigenvalues of the boost operator, which results in a sum over residues. The latter reproduces the Wick rotation relating Euclidean $Spin(4)$ to Lorentzian $SL(2,C)$ spinfoams studied by Dona, Gozzini and Nicotra. We provide explicit expressions in terms of hypergeometric functions and specialize them to the $\gamma$-simple representations relevant for spinfoams.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper shows that Ruhl's analytic definition of the Toller matrices matches the iε prescription and a boost-integral residue sum that recovers the Wick rotation, with explicit hypergeometric forms for γ-simple cases.

read the letter

The core contribution is the set of equivalences between Ruhl's definition of T^(±) via analyticity and asymptotics, the Feynman iε prescription, and the integral over boost eigenvalues that reduces to a residue sum. The latter directly reproduces the Wick rotation from Euclidean Spin(4) to Lorentzian SL(2,C) spinfoams. They also supply hypergeometric expressions after restricting to the γ-simple representations that matter for actual spinfoam calculations. These links are not in the prior literature they cite, so the equivalences count as new technical results. The work uses standard representation theory and contour integration, which keeps the derivations straightforward once the assumptions are granted. The explicit formulas are the most immediately usable part, since they turn abstract statements into something one can plug into amplitude computations. The main soft spot is the polynomial boundedness assumption needed to justify the contour shifts and residue extraction. The paper states that the T^(±) are polynomially bounded on the Lorentz group and belong to γ-simple representations, then gives the hypergeometric forms, but does not appear to include an independent asymptotic analysis confirming the growth rate holds in the directions required for the deformations. If the actual growth is faster along some sequences of labels, extra contributions would appear and the claimed equivalence would need adjustment. This is a genuine but narrow gap rather than a fatal one, because the rest of the argument follows standard lines once boundedness is accepted. The paper is aimed at people already working on Lorentzian spinfoam amplitudes who need a cleaner handle on the causal and analytic properties. It does not open new physical territory but removes a technical obstacle that has slowed reliable calculations. A serious referee should see it, because the equivalences are checkable and the explicit expressions add concrete value even if the boundedness step needs one more verification pass.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript establishes three equivalent representations for the Toller matrices T^(±) in the causal formulation of 4d Lorentzian spinfoam transition amplitudes: Ruhl's definition via analyticity and asymptotic properties, the Feynman iε prescription, and an integral over eigenvalues of the boost operator that evaluates to a sum over residues. The residue sum is shown to reproduce the Wick rotation relating Euclidean Spin(4) to Lorentzian SL(2,C) spinfoams. Explicit expressions in hypergeometric functions are derived and specialized to the γ-simple representations relevant for spinfoams, with the relation T^(+) + T^(-) = D holding for the Wigner matrix D.

Significance. If the equivalences hold under the stated assumptions, the paper supplies a rigorous analytic bridge between representation-theoretic definitions of Toller matrices and the practical iε prescription used in spinfoam models. The explicit hypergeometric forms and residue-sum representation offer concrete tools for computations and clarify the connection to Euclidean spinfoams via Wick rotation. The work relies on standard tools of representation theory and contour integration with no free parameters or ad-hoc entities, which strengthens the mathematical foundations of Lorentzian quantum gravity amplitudes.

major comments (2)

[section deriving the hypergeometric expressions and the equivalence proofs] The central equivalences (Ruhl definition ↔ iε prescription ↔ boost-eigenvalue integral plus residues) rely on polynomial boundedness of T^(±) on the Lorentz group together with the γ-simple representation condition to license contour deformations and residue extraction. While the abstract and the derivations assert these properties, the manuscript does not contain an explicit asymptotic analysis of the provided hypergeometric expressions confirming that the growth remains polynomially bounded in the directions required for the deformations. If the actual growth exceeds polynomial order for any sequence of γ-simple labels, extra contributions would appear in the residue sum and the claimed equivalences would fail.
[section on the boost-eigenvalue integral representation] In the derivation of the integral representation over boost eigenvalues, the contour choices and the justification for shifting contours to extract the residue sum are not specified with sufficient detail. In particular, it is unclear how the γ-simple condition alone guarantees that no additional poles or contributions arise outside the asserted polynomial boundedness.

minor comments (2)

The relation T^(+) + T^(-) = D is stated but a brief reminder of the definition of the Wigner matrix D and its unitarity would improve readability for readers outside the immediate spinfoam literature.
Notation for the Toller matrices T^(±) could be introduced with an explicit reference to their appearance in the causal formulation of the transition amplitudes, to make the opening paragraphs self-contained.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and for the constructive comments. We address each major point below and will incorporate the suggested clarifications and additions in a revised version.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [section deriving the hypergeometric expressions and the equivalence proofs] The central equivalences (Ruhl definition ↔ iε prescription ↔ boost-eigenvalue integral plus residues) rely on polynomial boundedness of T^(±) on the Lorentz group together with the γ-simple representation condition to license contour deformations and residue extraction. While the abstract and the derivations assert these properties, the manuscript does not contain an explicit asymptotic analysis of the provided hypergeometric expressions confirming that the growth remains polynomially bounded in the directions required for the deformations. If the actual growth exceeds polynomial order for any sequence of γ-simple labels, extra contributions would appear in the residue sum and the claimed equivalences would fail.

Authors: We agree that an explicit asymptotic analysis of the hypergeometric expressions is needed to rigorously confirm polynomial boundedness in the directions relevant for contour deformation. Although the manuscript states that T^(±) are polynomially bounded (as required by Ruhl's definition and standard for SL(2,C) matrix elements), we did not provide a dedicated verification for the derived hypergeometric forms. In the revised manuscript we will add a short appendix containing this analysis, using the known large-boost asymptotics of hypergeometric functions for γ-simple representations and verifying that growth remains at most polynomial, thereby ensuring the contour deformations and residue sums are justified without extraneous contributions. revision: yes
Referee: [section on the boost-eigenvalue integral representation] In the derivation of the integral representation over boost eigenvalues, the contour choices and the justification for shifting contours to extract the residue sum are not specified with sufficient detail. In particular, it is unclear how the γ-simple condition alone guarantees that no additional poles or contributions arise outside the asserted polynomial boundedness.

Authors: We acknowledge that the contour choices and deformation arguments could be presented with greater explicitness. The original derivation relies on the analytic properties established via the iε prescription and the γ-simple condition to restrict the locations of poles, but the precise paths and the absence of other singularities were not spelled out step by step. In the revision we will expand the relevant section to specify the initial and deformed contours, the regions where the integrand is analytic, and how the γ-simple condition together with polynomial boundedness excludes additional poles or non-residue contributions when the contour is shifted. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: equivalences derived from analytic properties and integral representations

full rationale

The paper establishes three equivalent representations of the Toller matrices T^(±) by showing that Ruhl's analytic/asymptotic definition matches the Feynman iε prescription and an eigenvalue integral plus residue sum. These steps rely on explicit assumptions of polynomial boundedness on the Lorentz group and γ-simple representations to license contour deformations, together with hypergeometric formulae after specialization. No step reduces a claimed result to a fitted parameter, self-definition, or load-bearing self-citation chain; the central equivalences remain independent of the inputs once the growth and representation conditions are granted. References to prior spinfoam literature provide context but do not substitute for the derivations performed here.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work rests on standard properties of unitary irreducible representations of SL(2,C) and polynomial boundedness; no new free parameters, ad-hoc axioms, or invented entities are introduced beyond the Toller matrices themselves, which are defined by the equivalences shown.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Toller matrices are polynomially bounded functions on the Lorentz group satisfying T^(+) + T^(-) = D where D is a Wigner matrix for an irreducible representation of SL(2,C).
Stated in the abstract as the starting point for the analytic properties studied.
standard math Standard contour integration and residue calculus apply to the integral representation over boost eigenvalues.
Invoked to obtain the sum over residues that reproduces the Wick rotation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5494 in / 1588 out tokens · 48641 ms · 2026-05-08T01:49:33.623377+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

133 extracted references · 108 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

[1]

(See also [41]), and are reported explicitly in (B7). By inserting the resolution of the identity (27) into the definition of the reduced Wignerd-matrix, we can write d(ρ,k) jlm (β) =D (ρ,k) jmlm(e βσz 2 ) =⟨j m|e −iβ ˆKz |l m⟩ = Z ∞ −∞ dω⟨j m|e −iβKz |ω m⟩ ⟨ω m|l m⟩ = Z ∞ −∞ dωe −iβω ⟨ω m|j m⟩ ⟨ω m|l m⟩.(28) 5 The overlap coefficients⟨ω m|j m⟩have four f...
[2]

Coefficient-level continuation and compact-support thresholds TheWickrotationusedinthemaintextisimplementedonthetwoequivalentEuclideanClebsch-Gordanexpansions of the Biedenharn-Dolginov function as d(p,q) L jlm(t) = 2jLX n=0 eit(2n−2jL−m) C jm jL(n−jL)j R(m−n+jL) C lm jL(n−jL)j R(m−n+jL) ,(C20) d(p,q) R jlm(t) = 2jRX r=0 eit(m−2jR+2r) C jm jL(m−jR+r)j R(j...
[3]

Inverse Wick rotation The coefficient-level Wick rotation can be inverted, branch by branch. The inverse maps on the representation labels are W −1 + :ρ→ −ip , k→q , β→ −it ,(C28) W −1 − :ρ→+ip , k→ −q , β→ −it .(C29) Under these maps, the Lorentzian infinite sums truncate by the compactSU(2)support conditions. Before removing the convention factors, one ...
[4]

Rühl,The Lorentz Group and Harmonic Analysis, Mathematical physics monograph series, W

W. Rühl,The Lorentz Group and Harmonic Analysis, Mathematical physics monograph series, W. A. Benjamin (1970)

1970
[5]

Martin-Dussaud,A Primer of Group Theory for Loop Quantum Gravity and Spin-foams,Gen

P. Martin-Dussaud,A Primer of Group Theory for Loop Quantum Gravity and Spin-foams,Gen. Rel. Grav.51110 (2019) [arXiv:1902.08439]

work page arXiv 2019
[6]

Rovelli and F

C. Rovelli and F. Vidotto,Covariant Loop Quantum Gravity, Cambridge University Press (2014), DOI

2014
[7]

Ashtekar and E

A. Ashtekar and E. Bianchi,A short review of Loop Quantum Gravity,Rept. Prog. Phys.84042001 (2021) [arXiv:2104.04394]

work page arXiv 2021
[8]

Engle, E

J. Engle, E. Livine, R. Pereira and C. Rovelli,LQG vertex with finite Immirzi parameter,Nucl. Phys. B 799136 (2008) [arXiv:0711.0146]

work page arXiv 2008
[9]

Bianchi, C

E. Bianchi, C. Chen and M. Gamonal,Causal spinfoam vertex for 4d Lorentzian quantum gravity, [arXiv:2601.23162]

work page arXiv
[10]

Livine and D

E.R. Livine and D. Oriti,Implementing causality in the spin foam quantum geometry,Nucl. Phys. B663 231 (2003) [arXiv:gr-qc/0210064]

work page arXiv 2003
[11]

Oriti,The Feynman propagator for spin foam quantum gravity,Phys

D. Oriti,The Feynman propagator for spin foam quantum gravity,Phys. Rev. Lett.94111301 (2005) [arXiv:gr-qc/0410134]

work page arXiv 2005
[12]

Causal structure in spin-foams

E. Bianchi and P. Martin-Dussaud,Causal Structure in Spin Foams,Universe10181 (2024) [arXiv:2109.00986]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024
[13]

Reisenberger and C

M.P. Reisenberger and C. Rovelli,’Sum over surfaces’ form of loop quantum gravity,Phys. Rev. D563490 (1997) [arXiv:gr-qc/9612035]

work page arXiv 1997
[14]

Markopoulou and L

F. Markopoulou and L. Smolin,Causal evolution of spin networks,Nucl. Phys. B508409 (1997) [arXiv:gr-qc/9702025]

work page arXiv 1997
[15]

Markopoulou and L

F. Markopoulou and L. Smolin,Quantum geometry with intrinsic local causality,Phys. Rev. D58084032 (1998) [arXiv:gr-qc/9712067]

work page arXiv 1998
[16]

Markopoulou,Quantum causal histories,Class

F. Markopoulou,Quantum causal histories,Class. Quant. Grav.172059 (2000) [arXiv:hep-th/9904009]

work page arXiv 2000
[17]

Gupta,Causality in spin foam models,Phys

S. Gupta,Causality in spin foam models,Phys. Rev. D 61064014 (2000) [arXiv:gr-qc/9908018]

work page arXiv 2000
[18]

Pfeiffer,On the causal Barrett-Crane model: Measure, coupling constant, Wick rotation, symmetries and observables,Phys

H. Pfeiffer,On the causal Barrett-Crane model: Measure, coupling constant, Wick rotation, symmetries and observables,Phys. Rev. D67064022 (2003) [arXiv:gr-qc/0212049]

work page arXiv 2003
[19]

Hawkins, F

E. Hawkins, F. Markopoulou and H. Sahlmann, Evolution in quantum causal histories,Class. Quant. Grav.203839 (2003) [arXiv:hep-th/0302111]

work page arXiv 2003
[20]

Freidel and E.R

L. Freidel and E.R. Livine,Ponzano-Regge model revisited III: Feynman diagrams and effective field theory,Class. Quant. Grav.232021 (2006) [arXiv:hep-th/0502106]

work page arXiv 2006
[21]

Oriti,Generalised group field theories and quantum gravity transition amplitudes,Phys

D. Oriti,Generalised group field theories and quantum gravity transition amplitudes,Phys. Rev. D73061502 (2006) [arXiv:gr-qc/0512069]

work page arXiv 2006
[22]

Oriti and T

D. Oriti and T. Tlas,Causality and matter propagation in 3-D spin foam quantum gravity,Phys. Rev. D74 104021 (2006) [arXiv:gr-qc/0608116]

work page arXiv 2006
[23]

Livine and D.R

E.R. Livine and D.R. Terno,Quantum causal histories in the light of quantum information,Phys. Rev. D75 084001 (2007) [arXiv:gr-qc/0611135]

work page arXiv 2007
[24]

Rovelli and E

C. Rovelli and E. Wilson-Ewing,Discrete Symmetries in Covariant LQG,Phys. Rev. D86064002 (2012) [arXiv:1205.0733]

work page arXiv 2012
[25]

Bianchi and F

E. Bianchi and F. Hellmann,The Construction of Spin Foam Vertex Amplitudes,SIGMA9008 (2013) [arXiv:1207.4596]

work page arXiv 2013
[26]

Oriti,Group field theory as the 2nd quantization of Loop Quantum Gravity,Class

D. Oriti,Group field theory as the 2nd quantization of Loop Quantum Gravity,Class. Quant. Grav.33 085005 (2016) [arXiv:1310.7786]

work page arXiv 2016
[27]

Immirzi,A note on the spinor construction of Spin Foam amplitudes,Class

G. Immirzi,A note on the spinor construction of Spin Foam amplitudes,Class. Quant. Grav.31095016 (2014) [arXiv:1311.6942]

work page arXiv 2014
[28]

Cortês and L

M. Cortês and L. Smolin,Spin foam models as energetic causal sets,Phys. Rev. D93084039 (2016) [arXiv:1407.0032]

work page arXiv 2016
[29]

Wieland,A new action for simplicial gravity in four dimensions,Class

W.M. Wieland,A new action for simplicial gravity in four dimensions,Class. Quant. Grav.32015016 (2015) [arXiv:1407.0025]

work page arXiv 2015
[30]

Immirzi,Causal spin foams, [arXiv:1610.04462]

G. Immirzi,Causal spin foams, [arXiv:1610.04462]

work page arXiv
[31]

Finocchiaro and D

M. Finocchiaro and D. Oriti,Spin foam models and the Duflo map,Class. Quant. Grav.37015010 (2020) [arXiv:1812.03550]

work page arXiv 2020
[32]

Jercher, D

A.F. Jercher, D. Oriti and A.G.A. Pithis,Complete Barrett-Crane model and its causal structure,Phys. Rev. D106066019 (2022) [arXiv:2206.15442]

work page arXiv 2022
[33]

Jercher, J.D

A.F. Jercher, J.D. Simão and S. Steinhaus,Partial absence of cosine problem in 3D Lorentzian spin foams,Class. Quant. Grav.42017001 (2025) [arXiv:2404.16943]

work page arXiv 2025
[34]

Simão,A new 2+1 coherent spin-foam vertex for quantum gravity,Class

J.D. Simão,A new 2+1 coherent spin-foam vertex for quantum gravity,Class. Quant. Grav.41195015 (2024) [arXiv:2402.05993]

work page arXiv 2024
[35]

Oriti,Quantum information elements in Quantum Gravity states and processes, [arXiv:2502.21234]

D. Oriti,Quantum information elements in Quantum Gravity states and processes, [arXiv:2502.21234]

work page arXiv
[36]

Asante and B

S.K. Asante and B. Borgolte,Causal structure and topology change in (2+1)-dimensional simplicial gravity,Phys. Rev. D112126001 (2025) 20 [arXiv:2507.10697]

work page arXiv 2025
[37]

Beltrán,Causal Structure for Generalized Spinfoams, [arXiv:2603.22661]

C.E. Beltrán,Causal Structure for Generalized Spinfoams, [arXiv:2603.22661]

work page arXiv
[38]

Toller,On the group-theoretical approach to complex angular momentum and signature,Nuovo Cim

M. Toller,On the group-theoretical approach to complex angular momentum and signature,Nuovo Cim. A54295 (1968)

1968
[39]

Toller,An expansion of the scattering amplitude at vanishing four-momentum transfer using the representations of the Lorentz group,Nuovo Cim

M. Toller,An expansion of the scattering amplitude at vanishing four-momentum transfer using the representations of the Lorentz group,Nuovo Cim. A53 671 (1968)

1968
[40]

Sciarrino and M

A. Sciarrino and M. Toller,Decomposition of the unitary irreducible representations of the group SL(2C) restricted to the subgroup SU(1, 1),Journal of Mathematical Physics81252 (1967)

1967
[41]

P. Donà, F. Gozzini and A. Nicotra,Wick rotation for spin foam quantum gravity,Phys. Rev. D104126008 (2021) [arXiv:2106.14672]

work page arXiv 2021
[42]

Speziale,Boosting Wigner’s nj-symbols,J

S. Speziale,Boosting Wigner’s nj-symbols,J. Math. Phys.58032501 (2017) [arXiv:1609.01632]

work page arXiv 2017
[43]

Huszár,Angular momentum and unitary spinor bases of the Lorentz group,Acta Phys

M. Huszár,Angular momentum and unitary spinor bases of the Lorentz group,Acta Phys. Hung.30241 (1971)

1971
[44]

Rashid,Boost Matrix Elements of the Homogeneous Lorentz groups,J

M.A. Rashid,Boost Matrix Elements of the Homogeneous Lorentz groups,J. Math. Phys.201514 (1979)

1979
[45]

Biedenharn,Wigner Coefficients for the R4 Group and Some Applications,J

L.C. Biedenharn,Wigner Coefficients for the R4 Group and Some Applications,J. Math. Phys.2433 (1961)

1961
[46]

Barut and R

A.O. Barut and R. Wilson,Some New Identities of Clebsch-Gordan Coefficients and Representation Functions of SO(2,1) and SO(4),J. Math. Phys.17 900 (1976)

1976
[47]

Lorente and P.D

M. Lorente and P.D. Kramer,Tensor and spin representations of SO(4) and discrete quantum gravity, in8th International Symposium Symmetries in Science, 10, 2003, DOI [arXiv:gr-qc/0402050]

work page arXiv 2003
[48]

Barrett and L

J.W. Barrett and L. Crane,A Lorentzian signature model for quantum general relativity,Class. Quant. Grav.173101 (2000) [arXiv:gr-qc/9904025]

work page arXiv 2000
[49]

Barrett, R.J

J.W. Barrett, R.J. Dowdall, W.J. Fairbairn, H. Gomes and F. Hellmann,Asymptotic analysis of the EPRL four-simplex amplitude,J. Math. Phys.50112504 (2009) [arXiv:0902.1170]

work page arXiv 2009
[50]

Barrett, R.J

J.W. Barrett, R.J. Dowdall, W.J. Fairbairn, F. Hellmann and R. Pereira,Lorentzian spin foam amplitudes: Graphical calculus and asymptotics,Class. Quant. Grav.27165009 (2010) [arXiv:0907.2440]

work page arXiv 2010
[51]

Han,On Spinfoam Models in Large Spin Regime, Class

M. Han,On Spinfoam Models in Large Spin Regime, Class. Quant. Grav.31015004 (2014) [arXiv:1304.5627]

work page arXiv 2014
[52]

P. Dona, M. Fanizza, P. Martin-Dussaud and S. Speziale,Asymptotics ofSL(2,C)coherent invariant tensors,Commun. Math. Phys.389399 (2022) [arXiv:2011.13909]

work page arXiv 2022
[53]

Dona and S

P. Dona and S. Speziale,Asymptotics of lowest unitary SL(2,C) invariants on graphs,Phys. Rev. D102 086016 (2020) [arXiv:2007.09089]

work page arXiv 2020
[54]

Dona,Geometry from local flatness in Lorentzian spin foam theories,Phys

P. Dona,Geometry from local flatness in Lorentzian spin foam theories,Phys. Rev. D107066011 (2023) [arXiv:2211.04743]

work page arXiv 2023
[55]

M. Han, Z. Huang, H. Liu and D. Qu,Numerical computations of next-to-leading order corrections in spinfoam large-jasymptotics,Phys. Rev. D102 124010 (2020) [arXiv:2007.01998]

work page arXiv 2020
[56]

Han and H

M. Han and H. Liu,Analytic continuation of spinfoam models,Phys. Rev. D105024012 (2022) [arXiv:2104.06902]

work page arXiv 2022
[57]

Bianchi,Entropy of Non-Extremal Black Holes from Loop Gravity, [arXiv:1204.5122]

E. Bianchi,Entropy of Non-Extremal Black Holes from Loop Gravity, [arXiv:1204.5122]

work page arXiv
[58]

Bianchi and R.C

E. Bianchi and R.C. Myers,On the Architecture of Spacetime Geometry,Class. Quant. Grav.31214002 (2014) [arXiv:1212.5183]

work page arXiv 2014
[59]

Geiller and K

M. Geiller and K. Noui,Near-Horizon Radiation and Self-Dual Loop Quantum Gravity,EPL10560001 (2014) [arXiv:1402.4138]

work page arXiv 2014
[60]

Rovelli,Graviton propagator from background-independent quantum gravity,Phys

C. Rovelli,Graviton propagator from background-independent quantum gravity,Phys. Rev. Lett.97151301 (2006) [arXiv:gr-qc/0508124]

work page arXiv 2006
[61]

Bianchi, L

E. Bianchi, L. Modesto, C. Rovelli and S. Speziale, Graviton propagator in loop quantum gravity,Class. Quant. Grav.236989 (2006) [arXiv:gr-qc/0604044]

work page arXiv 2006
[62]

Bianchi, E

E. Bianchi, E. Magliaro and C. Perini,LQG propagator from the new spin foams,Nucl. Phys. B 822245 (2009) [arXiv:0905.4082]

work page arXiv 2009
[63]

Bianchi and Y

E. Bianchi and Y. Ding,Lorentzian spinfoam propagator,Phys. Rev. D86104040 (2012) [arXiv:1109.6538]

work page arXiv 2012
[64]

Vidotto,Spinfoam Cosmology: quantum cosmology from the full theory,J

F. Vidotto,Spinfoam Cosmology: quantum cosmology from the full theory,J. Phys. Conf. Ser.314012049 (2011) [arXiv:1011.4705]

work page arXiv 2011
[65]

Bianchi, C

E. Bianchi, C. Rovelli and F. Vidotto,Towards Spinfoam Cosmology,Phys. Rev. D82084035 (2010) [arXiv:1003.3483]

work page arXiv 2010
[66]

Roken,First-order quantum-gravitational correction from covariant, holomorphic spinfoam cosmology,Int

C. Roken,First-order quantum-gravitational correction from covariant, holomorphic spinfoam cosmology,Int. J. Mod. Phys. D221350005 (2015) [arXiv:1011.3335]

work page arXiv 2015
[67]

Henderson, C

A. Henderson, C. Rovelli, F. Vidotto and E. Wilson-Ewing,Local spinfoam expansion in loop quantum cosmology,Class. Quant. Grav.28025003 (2011) [arXiv:1010.0502]

work page arXiv 2011
[68]

Bianchi, T

E. Bianchi, T. Krajewski, C. Rovelli and F. Vidotto, Cosmological constant in spinfoam cosmology,Phys. Rev. D83104015 (2011) [arXiv:1101.4049]

work page arXiv 2011
[69]

Livine and M

E.R. Livine and M. Martin-Benito,Classical Setting and Effective Dynamics for Spinfoam Cosmology, Class. Quant. Grav.30035006 (2013) [arXiv:1111.2867]

work page arXiv 2013
[70]

Rennert and D

J. Rennert and D. Sloan,Anisotropic Spinfoam Cosmology,Class. Quant. Grav.31015017 (2014) [arXiv:1308.0687]

work page arXiv 2014
[71]

Rennert and D

J. Rennert and D. Sloan,A Homogeneous Model of Spinfoam Cosmology,Class. Quant. Grav.30235019 (2013) [arXiv:1304.6688]

work page arXiv 2013
[72]

Vilensky,Spinfoam cosmology with the proper vertex amplitude,Class

I. Vilensky,Spinfoam cosmology with the proper vertex amplitude,Class. Quant. Grav.34225015 (2017) [arXiv:1611.01508]

work page arXiv 2017
[73]

Kisielowski and J

M. Kisielowski and J. Lewandowski,Spin-foam model for gravity coupled to massless scalar field,Class. Quant. Grav.36075006 (2019) [arXiv:1807.06098]

work page arXiv 2019
[74]

Gozzini and F

F. Gozzini and F. Vidotto,Primordial Fluctuations From Quantum Gravity,Front. Astron. Astrophys. Cosmol.7629466 (2021) [arXiv:1906.02211]

work page arXiv 2021
[75]

Frisoni, F

P. Frisoni, F. Gozzini and F. Vidotto,Markov chain Monte Carlo methods for graph refinement in spinfoam cosmology,Class. Quant. Grav.40105001 (2023) [arXiv:2207.02881]

work page arXiv 2023
[76]

Frisoni, F

P. Frisoni, F. Gozzini and F. Vidotto,Primordial fluctuations from quantum gravity: 16-cell topological model, [arXiv:2312.02399]. 21

work page arXiv
[77]

M. Han, H. Liu, D. Qu, F. Vidotto and C. Zhang, Cosmological dynamics from covariant loop quantum gravity with scalar matter,Phys. Rev. D111086012 (2025) [arXiv:2402.07984]

work page arXiv 2025
[78]

Spinfoams, $\gamma$-duality and parity violation in primordial gravitational waves

E. Bianchi and M. Rincon-Ramirez,Spinfoams, γ-duality and parity violation in primordial gravitational waves, [arXiv:2403.06053]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[79]

Haggard and C

H.M. Haggard and C. Rovelli,Quantum-gravity effects outside the horizon spark black to white hole tunneling, Phys. Rev. D92104020 (2015) [arXiv:1407.0989]

work page arXiv 2015
[80]

Christodoulou, C

M. Christodoulou, C. Rovelli, S. Speziale and I. Vilensky,Planck star tunneling time: An astrophysically relevant observable from background-free quantum gravity,Phys. Rev. D94 084035 (2016) [arXiv:1605.05268]

work page arXiv 2016

Showing first 80 references.