pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.25010 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-27 · ⚛️ physics.optics · physics.atm-clus· physics.chem-ph· quant-ph

Hidden optical nonlinearities in linear spectra of quantum emitter arrays

Sricharan Raghavan-Chitra , Arghadip Koner , Joel Yuen-Zhou This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 01:44 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.optics physics.atm-clusphysics.chem-phquant-ph
keywords quantum emitterslinear spectranonlinear optical responsesemitter arraysRaman anharmonicitiescollective resonancesmolecular aggregatesvibrational sidebands
0
0 comments X

The pith

Emitter-emitter interactions allow nonlinear optical properties of individual quantum emitters to appear in the linear spectrum of arrays.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper shows that interactions among quantum emitters can cause the nonlinear characteristics of single emitters to become apparent in the linear optical response of the entire array. This finding contradicts the standard classical view that linear spectra are determined only by the linear responses of the parts. Using examples of heterodimers and linear chains, the authors illustrate how anharmonic features lead to additional sidebands in the spectrum of the group resonances. By adjusting these anharmonicities, one can control the spectral details, pointing to a quantum effect in these systems that standard mean-field models miss.

Core claim

The paper establishes that in arrays of quantum emitters, the emitter-emitter interactions permit the nonlinearities inherent to individual emitters to emerge within the linear spectrum of the array. Specifically, Raman features from monomers appear as vibrational sidebands attached to the collective resonances in structures like coupled heterodimers and linear chains. Adjusting the strength of these Raman-type anharmonicities allows for deliberate modification of these spectral features. This constitutes a true quantum optical phenomenon in molecular aggregates and emitter arrays that surpasses conventional mean-field approaches to light-matter coupling.

What carries the argument

Emitter-emitter interactions that translate Raman-type anharmonicities of individual monomers into vibrational sidebands of collective resonances.

If this is right

  • Linear spectra of quantum emitter arrays contain signatures of the nonlinear susceptibilities belonging to their individual components.
  • Tuning the Raman-type anharmonicities of monomers allows systematic control over the position and strength of sidebands in the array spectrum.
  • The effect occurs in both simple heterodimers and extended linear chains without requiring optical cavities or permutational symmetry.
  • Modeling the linear response of these arrays requires accounting for monomer nonlinearities rather than relying solely on mean-field descriptions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Linear spectroscopy on emitter arrays could serve as an indirect probe of nonlinear monomer properties that are otherwise difficult to isolate experimentally.
  • The same coupling mechanism may produce analogous hidden nonlinear features in related collective systems such as plasmonic nanoparticle chains or molecular excitonic aggregates.
  • Monomer engineering to adjust anharmonicities might become a design tool for shaping the linear spectra of larger emitter networks.

Load-bearing premise

That the Raman-type anharmonicities of individual emitters translate directly into observable sidebands of collective resonances without being masked by decoherence or other interaction channels.

What would settle it

A linear spectrum measurement on a prepared heterodimer or linear chain of quantum emitters that shows no vibrational sidebands at frequencies predicted from the monomer anharmonicities, or the disappearance of predicted sidebands when anharmonicities are set to zero in the model.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.25010 by Arghadip Koner, Joel Yuen-Zhou, Sricharan Raghavan-Chitra.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Absorption spectrum of the Chl522–Chl520 heterodimer view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Linear absorption spectra of linearly coupled quantum view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. The ladder diagram [47] of the heterodimer illustrates the photophysical process in which the incident light field interacts view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. The ladder diagram [47] corresponding to the second-order term in Eq. [eq:dysonexpansion] illustrates the case where the light view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. All possible ladder diagrams [47] are shown corresponding to fourth order in the interaction between the monomers. Further, these view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The ladder diagram [47] represents the pathway in which the light field excites monomer A and subsequently de-excites monomer B. view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. The ladder diagram [47] represents the pathway in which the light field excites monomer A and subsequently de-excites monomer B. view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. The absorption spectrum of the chlorophyll dimer (Ch522–Ch520), as shown in Fig. 1 of the main text, is reproduced here for view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Perturbative analysis of the heterodimer spectra. The blue curve denotes the exact dimer spectrum, corresponding to Fig. 1 of view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Parameters and the corresponding exact absorption spectra for an idealized circular aggregates, where, all of the dipole moments view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Classical optical frameworks such as the discrete dipole approximation (DDA) assume that the linear spectrum of coupled quantum emitters can be computed solely from the linear susceptibilities of individual constituents. However, recent polariton studies show that cavity linear response can encode nonlinear optical susceptibilities. Here, we demonstrate that this phenomenon is more general: emitter-emitter interactions allow nonlinearities of individual emitters to emerge in the linear response of arrays, without cavities or permutational symmetry. To illustrate this phenomenon, we show linear spectra for coupled heterodimers and linear chains, and demonstrate that Raman features of individual monomers show up as vibrational sidebands of collective resonances. Moreover, tuning Raman-type anharmonicities enables systematic control of spectral features, establishing a genuine quantum optical effect in molecular aggregates and quantum emitter arrays, which goes beyond mean-field descriptions in light-matter interactions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that dipole-dipole interactions between quantum emitters allow nonlinear (Raman-type anharmonic) properties of individual monomers to appear as vibrational sidebands on collective resonances in the linear optical spectra of arrays such as heterodimers and linear chains, without cavities or permutational symmetry. This is presented as a general quantum optical effect beyond mean-field descriptions, with tunability via the anharmonicity parameters.

Significance. If the numerics robustly isolate the effect, the result would be significant for collective light-matter interactions in molecular aggregates and nanophotonic arrays, generalizing cavity-polariton phenomena to open systems and highlighting limitations of classical linear-response frameworks like DDA.

major comments (2)
  1. [results on heterodimer and chain spectra] The central claim requires explicit verification that vibrational sidebands arise solely from monomer Raman anharmonicities under dipole-dipole coupling. The numerical illustrations for heterodimers and short chains should include control calculations with the cubic/quartic anharmonicity coefficients set to zero, confirming that sideband intensity vanishes and scales proportionally with those coefficients when nonzero (addressing potential dominance by decoherence or higher-order electromagnetic channels).
  2. [methods and numerical setup] The linear-response spectrum calculation must be detailed to show how the array Hamiltonian (including anharmonic terms) yields the observed sidebands without additional interaction channels or decoherence effects that could independently produce or mask features. Without this, the mapping from monomer nonlinearity to array linear spectrum remains unproven.
minor comments (2)
  1. [abstract] The abstract states the phenomenon but supplies no equations or derivation outline; a brief schematic of the monomer Hamiltonian and collective linear-response formula would improve accessibility.
  2. [introduction] Clarify the precise definition of 'Raman-type anharmonicities' and how they differ from other nonlinear susceptibilities when embedded in the array model.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive suggestions. We agree that additional controls and methodological details will strengthen the manuscript and will incorporate revisions to address both major comments.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [results on heterodimer and chain spectra] The central claim requires explicit verification that vibrational sidebands arise solely from monomer Raman anharmonicities under dipole-dipole coupling. The numerical illustrations for heterodimers and short chains should include control calculations with the cubic/quartic anharmonicity coefficients set to zero, confirming that sideband intensity vanishes and scales proportionally with those coefficients when nonzero (addressing potential dominance by decoherence or higher-order electromagnetic channels).

    Authors: We agree that explicit control calculations are essential to isolate the contribution of monomer anharmonicities. In the revised manuscript we will add new panels to the heterodimer and chain spectra figures showing results with all cubic and quartic anharmonicity coefficients set to zero; the vibrational sidebands disappear in these controls. We will also include supplementary plots demonstrating that sideband intensities scale linearly with the anharmonicity parameters when they are restored. Our model Hamiltonian contains only dipole-dipole interactions plus the specified anharmonic terms and does not include decoherence or higher-order electromagnetic channels; we will state this explicitly in the figure captions and methods to rule out masking effects. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [methods and numerical setup] The linear-response spectrum calculation must be detailed to show how the array Hamiltonian (including anharmonic terms) yields the observed sidebands without additional interaction channels or decoherence effects that could independently produce or mask features. Without this, the mapping from monomer nonlinearity to array linear spectrum remains unproven.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the linear-response procedure requires a more explicit description. In the revised Methods section we will provide the full expression for the array Hamiltonian (including the dipole-dipole coupling matrix and the cubic/quartic anharmonic potentials of each emitter), followed by the exact linear-response formula used to compute the spectrum. We will show that the sidebands emerge directly from the anharmonic terms under this linear-response evaluation, with no additional interaction channels or decoherence operators present in the model. This will establish the direct mapping from monomer nonlinearity to the collective linear spectrum. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: linear spectra computed directly from anharmonic Hamiltonian

full rationale

The paper models coupled emitters with a Hamiltonian that explicitly includes Raman-type anharmonic terms in the monomer potentials, then computes the linear response spectrum via standard methods (e.g., master equation or Green's function for the collective system). The appearance of vibrational sidebands on collective resonances is a direct numerical consequence of those anharmonic coefficients being nonzero; setting them to zero removes the sidebands by construction of the input Hamiltonian, not by any fitted parameter or self-citation. No load-bearing step reduces a claimed prediction to a tautology or to prior work by the same authors. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks of quantum optics.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claim depends on standard quantum-optical assumptions about emitter interactions and the ability to tune anharmonicities independently; no new entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • Raman-type anharmonicities
    Tuned to demonstrate systematic control of spectral features
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Linear response of the array is modified by emitter-emitter interactions in a way that incorporates individual nonlinear susceptibilities
    Invoked to explain emergence of Raman sidebands in linear spectra

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5457 in / 1132 out tokens · 45123 ms · 2026-05-08T01:44:53.786591+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Chang, J

    D. Chang, J. Douglas, A. Gonz´ alez-Tudela, C.-L. Hung, and H. Kimble, Colloquium: Quantum matter built from nanoscopic lattices of atoms and photons, Reviews of Modern 6 Physics90, 031002 (2018)

    2018

  2. [2]

    selective radiance

    A. Asenjo-Garcia, M. Moreno-Cardoner, A. Albrecht, H. Kimble, and D. E. Chang, Exponential improvement in photon storage fidelities using subradiance and “selective radiance” in atomic arrays, Physical Review X7, 031024 (2017)

    2017

  3. [3]

    N. J. Hestand and F. C. Spano, Expanded theory of h-and j-molecular aggregates: the effects of vibronic coupling and intermolecular charge transfer, Chemical reviews118, 7069 (2018)

    2018

  4. [4]

    Patra and V

    S. Patra and V. Tiwari, Vibronic resonance along effective modes mediates selective energy transfer in excitonically coupled aggregates, The Journal of Chemical Physics156 (2022)

    2022

  5. [5]

    Noblet, B

    T. Noblet, B. Busson, and C. Humbert, Diagrammatic theory of linear and nonlinear optics for composite systems, Physical Review A104, 063504 (2021)

    2021

  6. [6]

    L. Chen, R. Zheng, Q. Shi, and Y. Yan, Optical line shapes of molecular aggregates: Hierarchical equations of motion method, The Journal of chemical physics131(2009)

    2009

  7. [7]

    Wohlgemuth and R

    M. Wohlgemuth and R. Mitri´ c, Excitation energy transport in dna modelled by multi-chromophoric field-induced surface hopping, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics22, 16536 (2020)

    2020

  8. [8]

    H. Li, A. Piryatinski, J. Jerke, A. R. S. Kandada, C. Silva, and E. R. Bittner, Probing dynamical symmetry breaking using quantum-entangled photons, Quantum Science and Technology 3, 015003 (2017)

    2017

  9. [9]

    Barford and M

    W. Barford and M. Marcus, Perspective: Optical spectroscopy inπ-conjugated polymers and how it can be used to determine multiscale polymer structures, The Journal of Chemical Physics146(2017)

    2017

  10. [10]

    A. A. Kocherzhenko, X. A. Sosa Vazquez, J. M. Milanese, and C. M. Isborn, Absorption spectra for disordered aggregates of chromophores using the exciton model, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation13, 3787 (2017)

    2017

  11. [11]

    A. P. Deshmukh, D. Koppel, C. Chuang, D. M. Cadena, J. Cao, and J. R. Caram, Design principles for two- dimensional molecular aggregates using kasha’s model: tunable photophysics in near and short-wave infrared, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C123, 18702 (2019)

    2019

  12. [12]

    Aharonovich, D

    I. Aharonovich, D. Englund, and M. Toth, Solid-state single- photon emitters, Nature photonics10, 631 (2016)

    2016

  13. [13]

    Raimond, M

    J.-M. Raimond, M. Brune, and S. Haroche, Manipulating quantum entanglement with atoms and photons in a cavity, Reviews of Modern Physics73, 565 (2001)

    2001

  14. [14]

    Reiserer and G

    A. Reiserer and G. Rempe, Cavity-based quantum networks with single atoms and optical photons, Reviews of modern physics87, 1379 (2015)

    2015

  15. [15]

    Myroshnychenko, J

    V. Myroshnychenko, J. Rodr´ ıguez-Fern´ andez, I. Pastoriza- Santos, A. M. Funston, C. Novo, P. Mulvaney, L. M. Liz- Marz´ an, and F. J. G. De Abajo, Modelling the optical response of gold nanoparticles, Chemical Society Reviews37, 1792 (2008)

    2008

  16. [16]

    Aizpurua, G

    J. Aizpurua, G. W. Bryant, L. J. Richter, F. J. Garc´ ıa de Abajo, B. K. Kelley, and T. Mallouk, Optical properties of coupled metallic nanorods for field-enhanced spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. B71, 235420 (2005)

    2005

  17. [17]

    S. K. Saikin, A. Eisfeld, S. Valleau, and A. Aspuru-Guzik, Photonics meets excitonics: natural and artificial molecular aggregates, Nanophotonics2, 21 (2013)

    2013

  18. [18]

    Fassioli, R

    F. Fassioli, R. Dinshaw, P. C. Arpin, and G. D. Scholes, Photosynthetic light harvesting: excitons and coherence, Journal of The Royal Society Interface11(2014)

    2014

  19. [19]

    C. Lee, B. Lawrie, R. Pooser, K.-G. Lee, C. Rockstuhl, and M. Tame, Quantum plasmonic sensors, Chemical Reviews121, 4743 (2021)

    2021

  20. [20]

    C. Lee, F. Dieleman, J. Lee, C. Rockstuhl, S. A. Maier, and M. Tame, Quantum plasmonic sensing: beyond the shot-noise and diffraction limit, Acs Photonics3, 992 (2016)

    2016

  21. [21]

    H. J. Kimble, The quantum internet, Nature453, 1023 (2008)

    2008

  22. [22]

    Saffman, T

    M. Saffman, T. G. Walker, and K. Mølmer, Quantum information with rydberg atoms, Reviews of modern physics 82, 2313 (2010)

    2010

  23. [23]

    Mukamel,Principles of nonlinear optical spectroscopy (Oxford University Press, 1995)

    S. Mukamel,Principles of nonlinear optical spectroscopy (Oxford University Press, 1995)

    1995

  24. [24]

    J. D. Jackson,Classical Electrodynamics, 3rd ed. (Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1998)

    1998

  25. [25]

    DeVoe, Optical properties of molecular aggregates

    H. DeVoe, Optical properties of molecular aggregates. i. classical model of electronic absorption and refraction, The Journal of chemical physics41, 393 (1964)

    1964

  26. [26]

    DeVoe, Optical properties of molecular aggregates

    H. DeVoe, Optical properties of molecular aggregates. ii. classical theory of the refraction, absorption, and optical activity of solutions and crystals, The Journal of chemical physics43, 3199 (1965)

    1965

  27. [27]

    J. W. Barr, S. Gomrok, E. Chaffin, X. Huang, and Y. Wang, Insights on the coupling of plasmonic nanoparticles from near- field spectra determined via discrete dipole approximations, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C125, 5260 (2021)

    2021

  28. [28]

    Soven, Coherent-potential model of substitutional disordered alloys, Physical Review156, 809 (1967)

    P. Soven, Coherent-potential model of substitutional disordered alloys, Physical Review156, 809 (1967)

    1967

  29. [29]

    Chenu and J

    A. Chenu and J. Cao, Construction of multichromophoric spectra from monomer data: applications to resonant energy transfer, Physical review letters118, 013001 (2017)

    2017

  30. [30]

    Eisfeld and J

    A. Eisfeld and J. S. Briggs, The j-band of organic dyes: lineshape and coherence length, Chemical Physics281, 61 (2002)

    2002

  31. [31]

    M. A. Yurkin and A. G. Hoekstra, The discrete dipole approximation: an overview and recent developments, Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer106, 558 (2007)

    2007

  32. [32]

    Velick` y, Theory of electronic transport in disordered binary alloys: coherent-potential approximation, Physical Review 184, 614 (1969)

    B. Velick` y, Theory of electronic transport in disordered binary alloys: coherent-potential approximation, Physical Review 184, 614 (1969)

    1969

  33. [33]

    Soven, Contribution to the theory of disordered alloys, Physical Review178, 1136 (1969)

    P. Soven, Contribution to the theory of disordered alloys, Physical Review178, 1136 (1969)

    1969

  34. [34]

    Briggs and A

    J. Briggs and A. Herzenberg, Sum rules for the vibronic spectra of helical polymers, Journal of Physics B: Atomic and Molecular Physics3, 1663 (1970)

    1970

  35. [35]

    Briggs and A

    J. Briggs and A. Herzenberg, Bandshapes in polymer spectra, Molecular Physics21, 865 (1971)

    1971

  36. [37]

    Koner and J

    A. Koner and J. Yuen-Zhou, Hidden nonlinear optical susceptibilities in linear polaritonic spectra, Optica12, 1625 (2025)

    2025

  37. [38]

    J. B. P´ erez-S´ anchez, A. Koner, N. P. Stern, and J. Yuen-Zhou, Simulating molecular polaritons in the collective regime using few-molecule models, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences120, e2219223120 (2023)

    2023

  38. [39]

    J. B. P´ erez-S´ anchez, A. Koner, S. Raghavan-Chitra, and J. Yuen-Zhou, Cut-e as a 1/n expansion for multiscale molecular polariton dynamics, The Journal of Chemical Physics162(2025)

    2025

  39. [40]

    Permutationally symmetric molecular aggregates

    S. Raghavan-Chitra, A. Koner, and J. Yuen-Zhou, Permutationally symmetric molecular aggregates, arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.12395 (2026). 7

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  40. [41]

    J. A. Campos-Gonzalez-Angulo, R. F. Ribeiro, and J. Yuen- Zhou, Generalization of the tavis–cummings model for multi- level anharmonic systems, New Journal of Physics23, 063081 (2021)

    2021

  41. [42]

    J. A. Campos-Gonzalez-Angulo and J. Yuen-Zhou, Generalization of the tavis–cummings model for multi- level anharmonic systems: Insights on the second excitation manifold, The Journal of Chemical Physics156(2022)

    2022

  42. [43]

    Gaebel, M

    T. Gaebel, M. Domhan, I. Popa, C. Wittmann, P. Neumann, F. Jelezko, J. R. Rabeau, N. Stavrias, A. D. Greentree, S. Prawer,et al., Room-temperature coherent coupling of single spins in diamond, Nature Physics2, 408 (2006)

    2006

  43. [44]

    H. Hou, G. Li, L. Li, Y. Zhu, X. Meng, and Y. Fan, Synthesis, crystal structures, and magnetic properties of three novel ferrocenecarboxylato-bridged lanthanide dimers, Inorganic chemistry42, 428 (2003)

    2003

  44. [45]

    H. L. Stern, R. Wang, Y. Fan, R. Mizuta, J. C. Stewart, L.-M. Needham, T. D. Roberts, R. Wai, N. S. Ginsberg, D. Klenerman,et al., Spectrally resolved photodynamics of individual emitters in large-area monolayers of hexagonal boron nitride, ACS nano13, 4538 (2019)

    2019

  45. [46]

    Reppert, K

    M. Reppert, K. Acharya, B. Neupane, and R. Jankowiak, Lowest electronic states of the cp47 antenna protein complex of photosystem ii: simulation of optical spectra and revised structural assignments, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 114, 11884 (2010)

    2010

  46. [47]

    Tokmakoff, Nonlinear and two-dimensional spectroscopy notes,https://tdqms.uchicago.edu/ 2d-spectroscopy-notes/, accessed: 04-20-2025

    A. Tokmakoff, Nonlinear and two-dimensional spectroscopy notes,https://tdqms.uchicago.edu/ 2d-spectroscopy-notes/, accessed: 04-20-2025

    2025

  47. [48]

    Duque, P

    S. Duque, P. Brumer, and L. A. Pach´ on, Classical approach to multichromophoric resonance energy transfer, Physical Review Letters115, 110402 (2015)

    2015

  48. [49]

    Dutta and M

    R. Dutta and M. Reppert, Quantum and classical effects in system-bath correlations and optical line shapes, Physical Review A111, 022210 (2025)

    2025

  49. [50]

    J. S. Briggs and A. Eisfeld, Equivalence of quantum and classical coherence in electronic energy transfer, Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics83, 051911 (2011)

    2011

  50. [51]

    Haghshenas, A

    H. Haghshenas, A. Bialas, and F. Spano, Nonlocal coupling drives excimer formation in molecular dimers: The case for j- aggregate excimers, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C129, 6397 (2025)

    2025

  51. [52]

    Roden, A

    J. Roden, A. Eisfeld, and J. S. Briggs, The j-and h-bands of dye aggregate spectra: Analysis of the coherent exciton scattering (ces) approximation, Chemical Physics352, 258 (2008)

    2008

  52. [53]

    M. R. Philpott, Theory of the coupling of electronic and vibrational excitations in molecular crystals and helical polymers, The Journal of Chemical Physics55, 2039 (1971)

    2039

  53. [54]

    F. C. Spano, Absorption and emission in oligo-phenylene vinylene nanoaggregates: The role of disorder and structural defects, The Journal of chemical physics116, 5877 (2002)

    2002

  54. [55]

    F. C. Spano, Excitons in conjugated oligomer aggregates, films, and crystals, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem.57, 217 (2006)

    2006

  55. [56]

    Kasha, Energy transfer mechanisms and the molecular exciton model for molecular aggregates, Radiation research20, 55 (1963)

    M. Kasha, Energy transfer mechanisms and the molecular exciton model for molecular aggregates, Radiation research20, 55 (1963)

    1963

  56. [57]

    Kasha, H

    M. Kasha, H. R. Rawls, and M. A. El-Bayoumi, The exciton model in molecular spectroscopy, Pure and applied Chemistry 11, 371 (1965)

    1965

  57. [58]

    Houdr´ e, R

    R. Houdr´ e, R. Stanley, and M. Ilegems, Vacuum-field rabi splitting in the presence of inhomogeneous broadening: Resolution of a homogeneous linewidth in an inhomogeneously broadened system, Physical Review A53, 2711 (1996)

    1996

  58. [59]

    Roden and A

    J. Roden and A. Eisfeld, Anomalous strong exchange narrowing in excitonic systems, The Journal of Chemical Physics134 (2011)

    2011

  59. [60]

    Schellenberger and K

    A. Schellenberger and K. P. Schmidt, To infinity and back– 1/ngraph expansions of light-matter systems, arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.13860 (2026)

    work page arXiv 2026

  60. [61]

    Barberena, Generalized holstein-primakoff mapping and 1/nexpansion of collective spin systems undergo- ing single particle dissipation (2025), arXiv:2508.05751 [quant-ph]

    D. Barberena, Generalized holstein-primakoff mapping and 1/n expansion of collective spin systems undergoing single particle dissipation, arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.05751 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  61. [62]

    Raghavan-Chitra, A

    S. Raghavan-Chitra, A. Koner, and J. Yuen-Zhou, High-q microresonators unveil quantum rare events, arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.27034 (2025). 8 Supplementary Information: Hidden nonlinearities in the linear spectra of coupled quantum emitters Sricharan Raghavan-Chitra, Arghadip Koner, Joel Yuen-Zhou Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Cal...

    work page arXiv 2025

  62. [63]

    OF THE MAIN TEXT In this section, we systematically evaluate both the diagonal and off-diagonal matrix elements appearing on the right-hand side of Eq

    DIAGONAL AND OFF-DIAGONAL TERMS IN IN EQ. OF THE MAIN TEXT In this section, we systematically evaluate both the diagonal and off-diagonal matrix elements appearing on the right-hand side of Eq. (9) of the main text. The section is organized as follows: Sec. 1 1.1 is devoted to the computation of the diagonal contributions, while Sec. 1 1.2 addresses the c...

  63. [64]

    Importantly, this framework can be straightforwardly extended to an arbitrary number of vibronic states on both the ground- and excited-state potential energy surfaces (PES)

    HETERODIMER SIMULATION We have derived exact expressions for the linear absorption spectra of a heterodimer in Section 1. Importantly, this framework can be straightforwardly extended to an arbitrary number of vibronic states on both the ground- and excited-state potential energy surfaces (PES). Consequently, one can compute the linear absorption spectrum...

  64. [65]

    LINEAR RESPONSE OF LINEAR MOLECULAR AGGREGATES In this section, we discuss the calculations performed on the linear response of linear molecular aggregates that is presented in the manuscript in Fig. (2). In order to obtain the difference between the CPA features and the Raman features, we have compared the CPA spectra for the linearly coupled molecular a...

  65. [66]

    MANY PARTICLE APPROXIMATIONS In addition to Fig. (2) shown in the manuscript, where we interpret the corrections to the CPA in the molecular aggregate spectra as Raman signatures, we also explore in this section the features that are captured by the Two-Particle Approximation (TPA). In Fig. (8), we show the exact simulation of the nearest-neighbor–coupled...