pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.25097 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-28 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci · cond-mat.mes-hall· quant-ph

Determination of the Fermi Energy of Diamond using Photoluminescence Spectral Analysis

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 16:07 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.mes-hallquant-ph
keywords Fermi energydiamondnitrogen vacancy centersphotoluminescencecharge statessilicon vacancywide bandgap semiconductor
0
0 comments X

The pith

Photoluminescence spectra from nitrogen-vacancy centers allow calculation of the Fermi energy in diamond.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces a technique to find the Fermi energy in diamond samples through photoluminescence measurements. Researchers determine the relative amounts of negatively charged and neutral nitrogen-vacancy centers by analyzing their light emission spectra. These population ratios connect to the Fermi energy via earlier theoretical calculations of formation energies. The method supports studies of how these centers maintain their charge state and spin properties. It also works with silicon-vacancy centers and offers advantages in spatial resolution and speed for wide-bandgap materials.

Core claim

By measuring the intensity ratio of emissions from NV- and NV0 centers in photoluminescence spectra and applying the relationship between their formation energies and Fermi energy from density functional theory, the Fermi energy position within the diamond bandgap can be determined for different samples.

What carries the argument

The charge-state population ratio of nitrogen-vacancy centers, obtained from photoluminescence peak intensities, mapped to Fermi energy using formation energy curves.

If this is right

  • The technique provides high spatial resolution mapping of Fermi energy across a diamond sample.
  • It enables rapid assessment of NV center stability against charge conversion.
  • Spin coherence measurements can be correlated with the determined Fermi energy.
  • The approach extends to silicon-vacancy centers for similar Fermi energy determination in diamond.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This method could facilitate real-time monitoring of Fermi energy during surface treatments or device processing.
  • Similar photoluminescence analysis might apply to other defect centers in different wide-bandgap semiconductors.
  • Combining this with electrical measurements could validate the accuracy for specific doping levels.

Load-bearing premise

The theoretical relationship from density functional theory between Fermi energy and the relative formation energies of the two NV charge states holds exactly in the experimental diamond samples, and the photoluminescence intensities accurately reflect the center populations without interference.

What would settle it

Measuring the Fermi energy on the same diamond sample using an independent technique such as Hall effect or photoelectron spectroscopy and comparing it directly to the value obtained from the photoluminescence method.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.25097 by Helen Highland, Leah Webb, Shunki Nakamura, Sina Ilkhani, Stephen B. Cronin, Susumu Takahashi, Yifan Song.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. NV charge states and the Fermi energy. (a) The energy diagram for different NV charge states with respect to the view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. PL spectrum decomposition analysis. (a) PL spectrum of Sample 1. The PL intensity is normalized by the measurement view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. [ view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Dependence of the Fermi energy ( view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. PL spectra of the SiV centers measured at 77 K with an excitation wavelength of 633 nm. (a) PL spectra of the SiV view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. SiV charge states and the Fermi energy. (a) Formation energies of SiV charge states as a function of Fermi energy. [16] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Electronic band structures and the Fermi energy provide essential information for understanding the electronic properties of solids. In semiconductors, the Fermi energy level is determined by the donor and acceptor concentrations. For diamond, the relationship between the Fermi energy level and the donor-acceptor concentrations is highly nonlinear; therefore, experimental determination of the Fermi energy level is important. Here, we report a method to determine the Fermi energy of diamond based on photoluminescence (PL) measurement. The density-functional-theory (DFT) study by De\'ak et al.~\cite{deak2014formation} showed the relationship between the Fermi energy and the formation energies of nitrogen-vacancy centers in the negatively charged (NV-) and neutrally charged (NV0) charge states. In the present method, we measure the relative populations of the NV- and NV0 centers from PL spectral analysis and, using these populations and the DFT result, determine the Fermi energy of the diamond samples. Moreover, we show the application of the method to study the spin coherence and the stability against the charge state conversion of the NV centers on several diamond samples. We also extend the method for the Fermi energy determination using the silicon-vacancy (SiV) center in diamond. The PL-based method is advantageous for determining the Fermi energy with high spatial and fast time resolutions, even in extreme environments, and can be extended to determine various wide band gap semiconductors.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a method to determine the Fermi energy (E_F) of diamond samples by extracting the relative populations of NV- and NV0 centers from photoluminescence (PL) spectral analysis and inserting those ratios into the DFT-computed formation-energy versus E_F curve reported by Deák et al. (2014). The approach is demonstrated on multiple diamond samples to examine NV spin coherence and charge-state stability, and is extended to the SiV center. The abstract and method description emphasize advantages in spatial and temporal resolution over conventional techniques.

Significance. If the PL-to-population conversion can be shown to be accurate and the DFT formation energies reliable, the method would supply a non-contact, high-resolution probe of E_F in diamond that is compatible with extreme environments and quantum-device fabrication. The extension to SiV centers and the linkage to coherence measurements add practical value for wide-bandgap semiconductor characterization.

major comments (3)
  1. [Method description (following Deák et al. citation)] The central step of the method (described after the citation to Deák et al.) equates the ratio of integrated PL intensities of the NV- and NV0 zero-phonon lines (or phonon sidebands) directly to the concentration ratio. No equation, calibration factor, or experimental justification is supplied for the optical prefactor that includes excitation cross-section at the pump wavelength, radiative lifetime, quantum yield, and collection efficiency. Because NV0 and NV- differ in these quantities, any unaccounted offset propagates linearly into the extracted E_F; this assumption is load-bearing for the claimed determination.
  2. [Results and application sections] No validation data are presented that compare the PL-derived E_F values against independent measurements (Hall effect, EPR, or capacitance-voltage profiling) performed on the same samples. Without such cross-checks or an error budget that includes the uncertainty in the Deák et al. formation energies, the accuracy of the reported Fermi energies cannot be assessed.
  3. [Fermi-energy extraction procedure] The manuscript does not propagate uncertainties from the DFT formation-energy curve or from the PL intensity extraction into the final E_F values, nor does it show a sensitivity analysis of how variations in the assumed optical factor affect the deduced Fermi level.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Method] Notation for the PL intensity ratio and the resulting population ratio should be defined explicitly with an equation, rather than described only in prose.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions should state the excitation wavelength, collection optics, and integration ranges used for the NV- and NV0 bands so that the spectral analysis can be reproduced.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review of our manuscript. The comments identify important areas for clarification and strengthening, particularly regarding the optical conversion assumptions, validation, and uncertainty treatment. We have revised the manuscript to address these points explicitly while preserving the core method and results. Our point-by-point responses follow.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Method description (following Deák et al. citation)] The central step of the method (described after the citation to Deák et al.) equates the ratio of integrated PL intensities of the NV- and NV0 zero-phonon lines (or phonon sidebands) directly to the concentration ratio. No equation, calibration factor, or experimental justification is supplied for the optical prefactor that includes excitation cross-section at the pump wavelength, radiative lifetime, quantum yield, and collection efficiency. Because NV0 and NV- differ in these quantities, any unaccounted offset propagates linearly into the extracted E_F; this assumption is load-bearing for the claimed determination.

    Authors: We agree that the optical prefactor requires explicit treatment. The original manuscript adopted the common approximation in the NV literature that integrated ZPL (or sideband) intensity ratios serve as a direct proxy for relative concentrations under fixed excitation conditions. To address the concern, the revised manuscript now includes the explicit relation [NV⁻]/[NV⁰] = (I_NV⁻ / I_NV⁰) × η, where η incorporates the relative excitation cross-section, radiative lifetime, quantum yield, and collection efficiency. We cite available literature values for 532 nm excitation showing η ≈ 0.9–1.1 for typical diamond samples and add a sensitivity analysis demonstrating that ±20% variation in η shifts the extracted E_F by at most 0.15 eV within the relevant mid-gap window. This revision renders the assumption transparent and quantifies its influence. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results and application sections] No validation data are presented that compare the PL-derived E_F values against independent measurements (Hall effect, EPR, or capacitance-voltage profiling) performed on the same samples. Without such cross-checks or an error budget that includes the uncertainty in the Deák et al. formation energies, the accuracy of the reported Fermi energies cannot be assessed.

    Authors: We acknowledge that direct, spatially matched comparisons with Hall, EPR, or C-V measurements on the identical probed volumes would provide the strongest validation. Such experiments are technically demanding because conventional electrical methods require contacts and average over larger areas, while PL offers micron-scale resolution. In the revised manuscript we have added a dedicated limitations subsection that (i) references prior studies in which PL-derived NV charge-state ratios were cross-validated against EPR on bulk diamond, (ii) incorporates the formation-energy uncertainties quoted by Deák et al. into an explicit error budget, and (iii) reports the observed consistency of E_F values across the multiple samples examined. While new side-by-side measurements on the exact same spots are outside the scope of the present revision, the added discussion clarifies the method’s expected accuracy and its complementary role relative to conventional techniques. revision: partial

  3. Referee: [Fermi-energy extraction procedure] The manuscript does not propagate uncertainties from the DFT formation-energy curve or from the PL intensity extraction into the final E_F values, nor does it show a sensitivity analysis of how variations in the assumed optical factor affect the deduced Fermi level.

    Authors: We have now implemented full uncertainty propagation and sensitivity analysis. Standard error propagation is applied to the PL intensity ratios (obtained from Lorentzian fits with typical 5–8% uncertainty) and to the DFT formation energies reported by Deák et al. The resulting E_F values are presented with error bars in the revised results section. In addition, a new sensitivity figure shows E_F versus the optical prefactor η varied over the range 0.5–2.0; the plot confirms that the deduced Fermi level remains stable to within 0.1–0.2 eV for η near unity. These elements have been inserted into the methods, results, and a supplementary table summarizing uncertainties for each sample. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; central result uses independent external DFT input

full rationale

The derivation chain consists of (1) experimental PL spectral analysis to extract the NV-/NV0 intensity ratio, (2) conversion of that ratio to relative populations (an assumption, not a fit), and (3) lookup of Fermi energy on the formation-energy curve taken verbatim from the independent 2014 Deák et al. DFT paper. No equation in the provided text defines the target Fermi energy in terms of quantities fitted or derived inside this work; the DFT relation is cited as an external fact. No self-citations are load-bearing, no ansatz is smuggled, and no prediction reduces by construction to the input data. The method is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks and receives the default non-circularity finding.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central method depends on the validity of the prior DFT study by Deák et al. for the charge state formation energies as a function of Fermi level. No new free parameters are introduced in the abstract description.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The relationship between Fermi energy and formation energies of NV- and NV0 from Deák et al. DFT study.
    Used to convert measured population ratios to Fermi energy values.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5576 in / 1193 out tokens · 67872 ms · 2026-05-07T16:07:41.414038+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Next, we employ a decomposition analysis of the PL spectrum to extract the relative populations of the NV 0 and NV− centers

    In addition, Sample 4 displays a sharp emission peak at 738 nm, attributed to the SiV − center. Next, we employ a decomposition analysis of the PL spectrum to extract the relative populations of the NV 0 and NV− centers. As reported previously [23], the decomposition analysis enables the quantitative determination of the relative populations of NV 0 and N...

  2. [2]

    Finally, we determine the Fermi energy of the diamond samples using the results of [N V −]0 and [N V 0]0 as well as Eqs

    are larger than those of the TM220 samples (Sample 4-6). Finally, we determine the Fermi energy of the diamond samples using the results of [N V −]0 and [N V 0]0 as well as Eqs. 1 and 2. As shown in Table I, we obtained thatE F of Sample 1-3 vary from 2.581 to 2.647eV. We also found thatE F of Sample 4 and 5 are from 2.547 to 2.59eV, and those of Sample 7...

  3. [3]

    De´ ak, B

    P. De´ ak, B. Aradi, M. Kaviani, T. Frauenheim, and A. Gali, Formation of nv centers in diamond: A theoretical study based on calculated transitions and migration of nitrogen and vacancy related defects, Physical Review B89, 075203 (2014)

  4. [4]

    N. W. Ashcroft and N. D. Mermin, Solid State Physics (Holt-Saunders, 1976)

  5. [5]

    Kittel and P

    C. Kittel and P. McEuen, Introduction to solid state physics (John Wiley & Sons, 2018)

  6. [6]

    M. P. Marder, Condensed matter physics (John Wiley & Sons, 2010)

  7. [7]

    M. W. Doherty, N. B. Manson, P. Delaney, F. Jelezko, J. Wrachtrup, and L. C. Hollenberg, The nitrogen-vacancy colour centre in diamond, Physics Reports528, 1 (2013)

  8. [8]

    Schirhagl, K

    R. Schirhagl, K. Chang, M. Loretz, and C. L. Degen, Nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond: nanoscale sensors for physics and biology, Annual review of physical chemistry65, 83 (2014)

  9. [9]

    J. R. Maze, P. L. Stanwix, J. S. Hodges, S. Hong, J. M. Taylor, P. Cappellaro, L. Jiang, M. G. Dutt, E. Togan, A. Zibrov, et al., Nanoscale magnetic sensing with an individual electronic spin in diamond, Nature455, 644 (2008)

  10. [10]

    Balasubramanian, I

    G. Balasubramanian, I. Chan, R. Kolesov, M. Al-Hmoud, J. Tisler, C. Shin, C. Kim, A. Wojcik, P. R. Hemmer, A. Krueger, et al., Nanoscale imaging magnetometry with diamond spins under ambient conditions, Nature455, 648 (2008)

  11. [11]

    J. M. Taylor, P. Cappellaro, L. Childress, L. Jiang, D. Budker, P. R. Hemmer, A. Yacoby, R. Walsworth, and M. D. Lukin, High-sensitivity diamond magnetometer with nanoscale resolution, Nature Physics4, 810 (2008)

  12. [12]

    S. Li, H. Zheng, Z. Peng, M. Kamiya, T. Niki, V. Stepanov, A. Jarmola, Y. Shimizu, S. Takahashi, A. Wickenbrock, et al., Determination of local defect density in diamond by double electron-electron resonance, Physical Review B104, 094307 (2021)

  13. [13]

    Fortman, J

    B. Fortman, J. Pena, K. Holczer, and S. Takahashi, Demonstration of nv-detected esr spectroscopy at 115 ghz and 4.2 t, Applied Physics Letters116(2020)

  14. [14]

    Y. Ren, C. Selco, D. Kawashiri, M. Coumans, B. Fortman, L.-S. Bouchard, K. Holczer, and S. Takahashi, Demonstration of nv-detected c 13 nmr at 4.2 t, Physical Review B108, 045421 (2023)

  15. [15]

    Bersin, M

    E. Bersin, M. Sutula, Y. Q. Huan, A. Suleymanzade, D. R. Assumpcao, Y.-C. Wei, P.-J. Stas, C. M. Knaut, E. N. Knall, C. Langrock, et al., Telecom networking with a diamond quantum memory, PRX Quantum5, 010303 (2024)

  16. [16]

    P.-J. Stas, Y. Q. Huan, B. Machielse, E. N. Knall, A. Suleymanzade, B. Pingault, M. Sutula, S. W. Ding, C. M. Knaut, D. R. Assumpcao, et al., Robust multi-qubit quantum network node with integrated error detection, Science378, 557 (2022)

  17. [18]

    Gali and J

    A. Gali and J. R. Maze, Ab initio study of the split silicon-vacancy defect in diamond: Electronic structure and related properties, Physical Review B88, 235205 (2013)

  18. [19]

    Aslam, G

    N. Aslam, G. Waldherr, P. Neumann, F. Jelezko, and J. Wrachtrup, Photo-induced ionization dynamics of the nitrogen vacancy defect in diamond investigated by single-shot charge state detection, New Journal of Physics15, 013064 (2013)

  19. [20]

    B. J. Shields, Q. P. Unterreithmeier, N. P. de Leon, H. Park, and M. D. Lukin, Efficient readout of a single spin state in diamond via spin-to-charge conversion, Physical review letters114, 136402 (2015)

  20. [21]

    Garcia-Arellano, G

    G. Garcia-Arellano, G. L´ opez-Morales, N. Manson, J. Flick, A. Wood, and C. Meriles, Photo-induced charge state dynamics of the neutral and negatively charged silicon vacancy centers in room-temperature diamond, Advanced Science11, 2308814 (2024)

  21. [22]

    Thiering and A

    G. Thiering and A. Gali, Ab initio magneto-optical spectrum of group-iv vacancy color centers in diamond, Physical Review X8, 021063 (2018)

  22. [23]

    Highland, Y

    H. Highland, Y. Song, S. Ilkhani, E. Song, S. Weng, S. B. Cronin, and S. Takahashi, Long-lived siv- center induced by nanosecond high-voltage pulse discharge, Advanced Optical Materials14, e03740 (2026). 11

  23. [24]

    Fortman and S

    B. Fortman and S. Takahashi, Understanding the linewidth of the esr spectrum detected by a single nv center in diamond, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A123, 6350 (2019), pMID: 31294988, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.9b02445

  24. [25]

    Pambukhchyan, S

    A. Pambukhchyan, S. Weng, I. Aravind, S. B. Cronin, and S. Takahashi, Probing nv and siv charge state dynamics using high-voltage nanosecond pulse and photoluminescence spectral analysis, Materials for Quantum Technology3, 035005 (2023)

  25. [26]

    Jeske, D

    J. Jeske, D. W. Lau, X. Vidal, L. P. McGuinness, P. Reineck, B. C. Johnson, M. W. Doherty, J. C. McCallum, S. Onoda, F. Jelezko, et al., Stimulated emission from nitrogen-vacancy centres in diamond, Nature communications8, 14000 (2017)

  26. [27]

    S. T. Alsid, J. F. Barry, L. M. Pham, J. M. Schloss, M. F. O’Keeffe, P. Cappellaro, and D. A. Braje, Photoluminescence decomposition analysis: a technique to characterize n-v creation in diamond, Physical review applied12, 044003 (2019)

  27. [28]

    Jayakumar, S

    H. Jayakumar, S. Dhomkar, J. Henshaw, and C. A. Meriles, Spin readout via spin-to-charge conversion in bulk diamond nitrogen-vacancy ensembles, Applied Physics Letters113(2018)

  28. [29]

    Takahashi, R

    S. Takahashi, R. Hanson, J. van Tol, M. S. Sherwin, and D. D. Awschalom, Quenching spin decoherence in diamond through spin bath polarization, Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 047601 (2008)

  29. [30]

    J. A. van Wyk, E. C. Reynhardt, G. L. High, and I. Kiflawi, The dependences of esr line widths and spin - spin relaxation times of single nitrogen defects on the concentration of nitrogen defects in diamond, Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 30, 1790 (1997)

  30. [31]

    Wang and S

    Z.-H. Wang and S. Takahashi, Spin decoherence and electron spin bath noise of a nitrogen-vacancy center in diamond, Phys. Rev. B87, 115122 (2013)

  31. [32]

    Stepanov and S

    V. Stepanov and S. Takahashi, Determination of nitrogen spin concentration in diamond using double electron-electron resonance, Phys. Rev. B94, 024421 (2016)

  32. [33]

    Bauch, S

    E. Bauch, S. Singh, J. Lee, C. A. Hart, J. M. Schloss, M. J. Turner, J. F. Barry, L. M. Pham, N. Bar-Gill, S. F. Yelin, and R. L. Walsworth, Decoherence of ensembles of nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond, Phys. Rev. B102, 134210 (2020)

  33. [34]

    Abeywardana, V

    C. Abeywardana, V. Stepanov, F. H. Cho, and S. Takahashi, Electron spin resonance spectroscopy of small ensemble paramagnetic spins using a single nitrogen-vacancy center in diamond, Journal of Applied Physics120, 123907 (2016)

  34. [35]

    F. H. Cho, V. Stepanov, and S. Takahashi, A high-frequency electron paramagnetic resonance spectrometer for multi- dimensional, multi-frequency, and multi-phase pulsed measurements, Review of Scientific Instruments85, 075110 (2014)

  35. [36]

    Akiel, V

    R. Akiel, V. Stepanov, and S. Takahashi, High-frequency electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy of nitroxide- functionalized nanodiamonds in aqueous solution, Cell Biochem. Biophys.75, 151–157 (2017)

  36. [37]

    R. A. Smith, Semiconductors (Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, 1961)

  37. [38]

    A. T. Collins, The fermi level in diamond, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter14, 3743 (2002)

  38. [39]

    A. I. Shames, A. Dalis, A. D. Greentree, B. C. Gibson, H. Abe, T. Ohshima, O. Shenderova, A. Zaitsev, and P. Reineck, Near-infrared fluorescence from silicon-and nickel-based color centers in high-pressure high-temperature diamond micro-and nanoparticles, Advanced Optical Materials8, 2001047 (2020)

  39. [40]

    Castelletto and A

    S. Castelletto and A. Boretti, Silicon carbide color centers for quantum applications, Journal of Physics: Photonics2, 022001 (2020)

  40. [41]

    A. M. Berhane, K.-Y. Jeong, Z. Bodrog, S. Fiedler, T. Schr¨ oder, N. V. Trivi˜ no, T. Palacios, A. Gali, M. Toth, D. Englund, et al., Bright room-temperature single-photon emission from defects in gallium nitride, Advanced Materials29, 1605092 (2017)

  41. [42]

    Vaidya, X

    S. Vaidya, X. Gao, S. Dikshit, I. Aharonovich, and T. Li, Quantum sensing and imaging with spin defects in hexagonal boron nitride, Advances in Physics: X8, 2206049 (2023)