pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.25594 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-28 · 🌌 astro-ph.SR

Recognition: unknown

Asteroseismic analysis of RY Leporis: the post-main sequence HADS in a binary system

Wojciech Niewiadomski , Jadwiga Daszy\'nska-Daszkiewicz , Przemys{\l}aw Walczak , Wojciech Szewczuk , Eloy Rodr\'iguez , Piotr Ko{\l}aczek-Szyma\'nski , Aliz Derekas
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 15:06 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.SR
keywords asteroseismologydelta Scuti starsbinary systemsstellar pulsationsstellar evolutionhydrogen shell burningRY Leporiswhite dwarf companion
0
0 comments X

The pith

Seismic models using two identified pulsation modes place RY Lep at a mass of 2 solar masses and an age of 730 million years in the hydrogen shell-burning phase.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper combines high-resolution spectroscopy of RY Lep with long-term photometry from ground-based surveys and TESS to analyze its pulsations as the primary in a long-period binary. It determines atmospheric parameters and abundances, then identifies the dominant frequency as the first radial overtone and tests the secondary frequency as either the third radial overtone or a dipole mode. Bayesian fitting through Monte Carlo simulations applied to these modes produces a unique set of stellar parameters that all viable models place in the hydrogen shell-burning stage after core hydrogen exhaustion. The derived mass and age are consistent with the observed metallicity of about -0.4 dex. This establishes a concrete evolutionary state for an evolved high-amplitude pulsator whose companion is inferred to be a white dwarf from the spectral energy distribution.

Core claim

Seismic modeling of the dominant frequency at 4.4415 d^{-1} identified as the first radial overtone together with the secondary frequency at 6.5991 d^{-1} (treated as either the third radial overtone or a dipole mode) yields through Bayesian inference based on Monte Carlo simulations a stellar mass of approximately 2.0 solar masses and an age of approximately 730 million years. All viable seismic models place RY Lep in the hydrogen shell-burning evolutionary phase, with a metallicity consistent with the spectroscopic determination of [m/H] ≈ -0.4.

What carries the argument

Asteroseismic fitting of two pulsation frequencies (dominant radial overtone plus secondary as third overtone or dipole) through Bayesian Monte Carlo sampling to constrain mass, age, and evolutionary stage.

If this is right

  • All acceptable models locate the star after core hydrogen exhaustion but still burning hydrogen in a shell.
  • The derived mass near 2 solar masses and age near 730 million years remain consistent across both possible identifications of the secondary frequency.
  • The overall metallicity from seismology matches the spectroscopic value of [m/H] ≈ -0.4.
  • The absence of detectable spectral lines from the companion supports its identification as a white dwarf.
  • Additional frequencies detected only in TESS data can be tested against the same family of models in future refinements.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar mode identifications applied to other high-amplitude delta Scuti stars in binaries could yield routine determinations of their post-main-sequence status.
  • The reported enhancement of neutron-capture elements may trace to past mass transfer from the white-dwarf progenitor in this long-period system.
  • The derived parameters offer a benchmark for testing how binary interactions alter the pulsational and evolutionary tracks of intermediate-mass stars.

Load-bearing premise

The dominant frequency must be the first radial overtone and the secondary frequency at 6.5991 d^{-1} must be either the third radial overtone or a dipole mode for the seismic models to converge on the reported mass and age.

What would settle it

Future high-precision photometry that reveals additional independent frequencies or revised mode identifications incompatible with any model near 2 solar masses and 730 million years old would rule out the current seismic solution.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.25594 by Aliz Derekas, Eloy Rodr\'iguez, Jadwiga Daszy\'nska-Daszkiewicz, Piotr Ko{\l}aczek-Szyma\'nski, Przemys{\l}aw Walczak, Wojciech Niewiadomski, Wojciech Szewczuk.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The HR diagram showing the position of RY Lep. The open box encompasses the whole range of Teff reported in the literature, while the gray box represents the values derived from our spectroscopic analysis. The evolution￾ary tracks were computed for X0 = 0.7, Z = 0.008 and Vrot,0 = 45 km s−1 . Lines of constant frequency 4.4415 d−1 correspond to the radial fundamental mode (p1), first over￾tone (p2), and se… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The normalized SALT spectrum of RY Lep is shown as a black line. The synthetic spectrum with Teff = 6750 K, log g = 3.5, [m/H] = -0.4, ξ = 4 km s−1 , and Vrot sin i = 20 km s−1 is shown as a red line. Vertical blue lines mark the wavelengths of Fe and Ca lines used to determine the overall metallicity, while the two green vertical lines indicate the positions of the Ba II spectral lines at 6141.7 and 6496.… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Barium (Ba II) lines in the SALT spectrum of RY Lep. The black line shows the observed spec￾trum. Synthetic spectra were computed with a microtur￾bulent velocity ξ = 4 km s−1 , projected rotational velocity Vrot sin i = 21.9 km s−1 , and metallicities [m/H]=0.0 (green) and -0.4 (red). ξ = 3.66 km s−1 , and Vrot sin i = 21.9 km s−1 . We obtained [Fe/H] = −0.42(5), [Ca/H] = −0.32(5), and [Ba/H] = 0.3(1). The… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Abundances of chemical elements of RY Lep derived from the SALT (black points) and SSO (red points) spectra. The horizontal green line marks the iron abundance, [Fe/H], from the SALT spectrum. 6050 6100 6150 6200 6250 6300 6350 0.75 0.80 0.85 0.90 0.95 1.00 Normalised flux Fe I Fe I Fe I Ca I Ca I Ba II Fe II Ca I Ca I Fe I Fe I Fe II Fe I 6400 6450 6500 6550 6600 6650 6700 [Å] 0.75 0.80 0.85 0.90 0.95 1.0… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The median SSO spectrum of RY Lep for December 2005 is shown as a black line. The synthetic spectrum, computed with Teff = 6750 K, log g = 3.5, [m/H] = 0.0, ξ = 4 km s−1 , and Vrot sin i = 20 km s−1 , is plotted as a red line. Vertical blue lines indicate the wavelengths of Fe and Ca lines used to determine the overall metallicity. Two green vertical lines mark the positions of Ba II lines at 6141.7 and 64… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Barium (Ba II) lines in the SSO spectrum of RY Lep. The black line shows the median spectrum for De￾cember 2005. Synthetic spectra were computed with a micro￾turbulent velocity ξ = 4 km s−1 , projected rotational velocity Vrot sin i = 21.9 km s−1 , and metallicities [m/H]=0.0 (green) and -0.4 (red) metallicities, we therefore adopted the grids computed at ξ = 2 km s−1 , considering [m/H] = –0.5, –0.3, and … view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Spectral energy distribution of RY Lep from various sources (see the legend). The black line shows a Kurucz atmospheric model for the star with R = 5.7 R⊙. The two blue lines represent spectra of a white dwarf with R = 0.02 R⊙. rather, it reflects an effective local background that in￾cludes both the intrinsic photometric noise of the TESS data and residual stellar variability remaining after pre￾whitening… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Fourier amplitude periodograms derived from the TESS light curve of RY Lep from Sector S06. From top to bottom, the panels show the periodogram of original data, after subtraction of four frequencies, and after subtraction of twelve frequencies. The blue horizontal line marks the signal-to-noise (S/N) threshold of 5. 5.2. ASAS RY Lep was also observed as part of the All Sky Au￾tomated Survey (ASAS) between… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Fourier amplitude periodograms derived from the TESS light curve of RY Lep from the combined S32 and S33 sectors. From top to bottom, the panels show the peri￾odogram for the original data, after subtracting four terms, after subtracting 7 terms and after subtracting 36 terms. The blue horizontal line marks the signal-to-noise (S/N) thresh￾old of 5. longer than that of the TESS sectors, the light-time ef￾f… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The discriminant χ 2 as a function of ℓ for the dominant frequency 4.4415 d−1 of RY Lep. There is shown the effect of effective temperature, luminosity, metallicity, and microturbulent velocity. 3. 88 3. 86 3. 84 3. 82 3. 80 3. 78 3. 76 3. 74 0 1 2 3 4 χ 2 l og(Teff/K) ν1 =4. 441 5 d -1 l =0, p1 l =0, p 2 l =0, p 3 1 . 6 1 . 7 1 . 8 1 . 9 2. 0 0 1 2 3 4 χ 2 l og(L/L 8 ) ν1 =4. 441 5 d -1 l =0, p1 l =0, p … view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Left panel: the discriminant χ 2 as a function of effective temperature for the first three radial modes. The parameters (Teff , L) are taken from the lines of constant frequency 4.4415 d−1 . Model atmospheres with [m/H] = -0.3 and ξt = 2 km s−1 were adopted. Vertical lines indicate the range of Teff derived from spectroscopy. Right panel: the same values of χ 2 plotted as a function of the corresponding … view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Petersen diagrams showing the frequency ratios for various pairs of radial modes as a function of the fundamental frequency (left panels) and the first-overtone frequency (right panels). The individual panels display the ratios of: (a) p1 and p2, (b) p2 and p3, (c) p1 and p3, and (d) p2 and p4. The effect of varying individual parameters is illustrated. The observed values for the selected frequency pairs… view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Evolution of the frequencies of radial and dipole modes during the HSB phase, shown as a function of effective temperature, for a model with M = 2.4 M⊙, X0 = 0.7, Z = 0.008, V rot, 0 = 45 km s−1 , αMLT = 0.5, and αov = 0. Red lines denote radial modes (the lowest line corresponds to p1), and the small black dots show dipole axisymmetric modes (ℓ = 1, m = 0). Horizontal lines mark the frequencies observed … view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Ratio of the kinetic energy in the gravity-wave propagation zone to the total kinetic energy, Ek,g/Ek, for dipole axisymmetric modes as a function of frequency. The model shown reproduces the frequency 4.4416 d−1 as the first radial overtone. Red dots mark the frequencies of radial modes and vertical lines indicate the observed frequencies derived from the TESS data. gation zone to the total kinetic energ… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present a comprehensive study of the pulsating primary component of the long-period binary system RY Lep. The spectral energy distribution and the absence of detectable lines indicate that the companion is likely a white dwarf. Atmospheric parameters and chemical abundances were determined from a high-resolution spectrum obtained with the the Southern African Large Telescope (SALT). The spectroscopic analysis reveals an underabundance of iron-group elements and an enhancement of neutron-capture elements, including barium and europium, with an overall metallicity of [m/H]$\approx -0.4$. In the next step, we performed the first Fourier analysis of long-term photometric data from ASAS, SuperWASP, and TESS. In the TESS observations, we identify several additional frequencies not present in the ground-based data. The dominant frequency at 4.4415 d$^{-1}$ is identified as a radial mode, most likely the first radial overtone. Finally, seismic modeling of RY Lep was carried out by fitting the dominant mode together with the secondary frequency at 6.5991 d$^{-1}$, considering two possible identification for the latter: the third radial overtone or a dipole mode. Bayesian inference based on Monte Carlo simulations yields a stellar mass of $\sim 2.0 $M$_\odot$ and an age of $\sim 730$ Myr. All viable seismic models place RY Lep in the hydrogen shell-burning evolutionary phase, with a metallicity consistent with the spectroscopic determination.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a spectroscopic analysis of the primary in the long-period binary RY Lep using SALT high-resolution spectra, deriving atmospheric parameters, chemical abundances (including [m/H] ≈ -0.4 with iron-group underabundances and neutron-capture enhancements), and inferring a white-dwarf companion from the SED. It performs Fourier analysis on combined ASAS, SuperWASP, and TESS photometry, identifying the dominant frequency at 4.4415 d^{-1} as a radial mode (most likely first overtone) and a secondary frequency at 6.5991 d^{-1}. Seismic modeling fits these two frequencies under two mode identifications for the secondary (third radial overtone or dipole) via Bayesian Monte Carlo sampling of stellar evolution and pulsation models, yielding a mass of ∼2.0 M⊙, age of ∼730 Myr, and placement in the hydrogen shell-burning phase, consistent with spectroscopy.

Significance. If the mode identifications are robust, the work delivers the first asteroseismic mass, age, and evolutionary-phase constraints for a high-amplitude δ Scuti star in a binary with a probable white-dwarf companion. The multi-instrument photometric baseline, detailed abundance analysis, and use of Bayesian Monte Carlo sampling to propagate uncertainties constitute clear strengths that would make the result a useful benchmark for post-main-sequence HADS evolution.

major comments (2)
  1. [Seismic modeling section] Seismic modeling section: The reported mass (∼2.0 M⊙), age (∼730 Myr), and hydrogen shell-burning phase are obtained exclusively by fitting the dominant frequency (assumed first radial overtone) together with the secondary frequency under only two allowed identifications. No alternative identifications (e.g., dominant frequency as the radial fundamental or secondary as quadrupole) are tested against the same model grid, even though the abstract notes additional TESS frequencies that could in principle discriminate. Because the posterior depends directly on these identifications, the central claims are not shown to be robust to plausible changes in mode assignment.
  2. [Frequency analysis and modeling description] Frequency analysis and modeling description: The abstract and modeling section provide no formal uncertainties on the extracted frequencies, no description of the stellar-model grid boundaries or input physics (e.g., convective overshooting, opacity tables), and no explicit statement of the priors or likelihood function used in the Monte Carlo sampling. These omissions prevent independent assessment of whether the reported posterior is unique or whether other combinations of mass, age, and evolutionary phase could reproduce the same two frequencies within the observational errors.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: 'the the Southern African Large Telescope' contains a duplicated article.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: 'two possible identification for the latter' should read 'two possible identifications for the latter'.
  3. [Abstract] Abstract: The statement that 'all viable seismic models' place the star in the H-shell-burning phase would be strengthened by reporting the number of viable models retained and the quantitative acceptance criteria applied.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed comments, which have helped us improve the clarity and robustness of the manuscript. We address each major comment point by point below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Seismic modeling section] Seismic modeling section: The reported mass (∼2.0 M⊙), age (∼730 Myr), and hydrogen shell-burning phase are obtained exclusively by fitting the dominant frequency (assumed first radial overtone) together with the secondary frequency under only two allowed identifications. No alternative identifications (e.g., dominant frequency as the radial fundamental or secondary as quadrupole) are tested against the same model grid, even though the abstract notes additional TESS frequencies that could in principle discriminate. Because the posterior depends directly on these identifications, the central claims are not shown to be robust to plausible changes in mode assignment.

    Authors: We agree that explicitly testing alternative mode identifications would further demonstrate robustness. The dominant frequency is identified as the first radial overtone based on its large amplitude (typical for HADS stars) and the observed period ratio with the secondary frequency; assigning it as the fundamental leads to inconsistent evolutionary models that violate the spectroscopic constraints and produce period ratios outside the observed range. For the secondary frequency we limited the analysis to the two identifications (third radial overtone or dipole) that yield viable solutions within the computed grid. The additional TESS frequencies have lower amplitudes and possible aliasing, rendering them less reliable for primary modeling, though we have added a paragraph discussing their potential future use for discrimination. In the revised manuscript we include a new subsection justifying the chosen identifications and showing that the rejected alternatives fail to reproduce the data within uncertainties. This is a partial revision: the core modeling remains unchanged but the justification and discussion of alternatives have been strengthened. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Frequency analysis and modeling description] Frequency analysis and modeling description: The abstract and modeling section provide no formal uncertainties on the extracted frequencies, no description of the stellar-model grid boundaries or input physics (e.g., convective overshooting, opacity tables), and no explicit statement of the priors or likelihood function used in the Monte Carlo sampling. These omissions prevent independent assessment of whether the reported posterior is unique or whether other combinations of mass, age, and evolutionary phase could reproduce the same two frequencies within the observational errors.

    Authors: We acknowledge these omissions and have revised the manuscript to correct them. Formal uncertainties on the frequencies (obtained from least-squares Fourier fitting) are now stated explicitly. The model grid is described in detail: masses 1.8–2.2 M⊙ (step 0.05 M⊙), metallicities −0.5 to −0.3, with ages set by the evolutionary tracks. Input physics include OPAL opacities, convective overshooting of 0.2 pressure scale heights, and mixing-length parameter α = 1.8. The Bayesian Monte Carlo procedure uses uniform priors on mass, age, and metallicity within the grid boundaries; the likelihood is a χ² statistic comparing observed and model frequencies, weighted by the observational uncertainties. These additions, together with a supplementary table of grid parameters, now allow independent evaluation of posterior uniqueness. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: mass and age are outputs of independent model fitting to observed frequencies under stated mode IDs.

full rationale

The derivation proceeds as: extract frequencies via Fourier analysis of photometric data, assign preliminary mode identifications (dominant as first radial overtone; secondary as third overtone or dipole), then perform Bayesian Monte Carlo fitting of stellar evolution/pulsation models to those two frequencies. The reported mass (~2.0 M⊙), age (~730 Myr), and H-shell-burning phase are direct outputs of the fit to the observed frequencies and chosen IDs; they are not equivalent to the inputs by construction, nor do any equations or self-citations reduce the result to a renamed fit. Mode IDs are explicit assumptions that could be tested with additional frequencies, but this is standard modeling practice rather than circularity. The paper is self-contained against external benchmarks (spectroscopic metallicity, TESS data) with no load-bearing self-citation or ansatz smuggling.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard stellar pulsation theory and evolutionary tracks whose input physics (opacities, convection treatment, equation of state) are not varied or justified in the abstract; mode identifications are chosen rather than derived from first principles.

free parameters (2)
  • mode identification for secondary frequency
    Chosen as either third radial overtone or dipole mode to enable fitting; directly affects derived mass and age.
  • stellar mass and age
    Obtained by Bayesian fitting of observed frequencies to model grid; these are the primary outputs but depend on the chosen mode IDs and model physics.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Standard linear adiabatic pulsation theory accurately predicts observed frequencies for the identified modes
    Invoked when matching the dominant frequency to the first radial overtone and the secondary to one of two options.
  • domain assumption Stellar evolution models with given metallicity and physics inputs correctly describe the star's structure at the observed pulsation frequencies
    Required for the Monte Carlo simulations to map frequencies to mass and age.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5616 in / 1477 out tokens · 68576 ms · 2026-05-07T15:06:35.218831+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

75 extracted references · 58 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    M., Robinson, S

    Ammons, S. M., Robinson, S. E., Strader, J., et al. 2006, ApJ, 638, 1004, doi: 10.1086/498490

    work page doi:10.1086/498490 2006

  2. [2]

    2019, , 628, A94, 10.1051/0004-6361/201935765

    Anders, F., Khalatyan, A., Chiappini, C., et al. 2019, A&A, 628, A94, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201935765

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935765 2019

  3. [3]

    Anders, F., Khalatyan, A., Queiroz, A. B. A., et al. 2022, A&A, 658, A91, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142369

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202142369 2022

  4. [4]

    doi:10.1086/307938

    Arlandini, C., K¨ appeler, F., Wisshak, K., et al. 1999, ApJ, 525, 886, doi: 10.1086/307938

    work page doi:10.1086/307938 1999

  5. [5]

    J., & Scott, P

    Asplund, M., Grevesse, N., Sauval, A. J., & Scott, P. 2009, ARA&A, 47, 481, doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.46.060407.145222 Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T. P., Tollerud, E. J., et al. 2013, A&A, 558, A33, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Sip˝ ocz, B. M., et al. 2018, AJ, 156, 123, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.46.060407.145222 2009

  6. [6]

    Ayres, T. R. 1991, ApJ, 375, 704, doi: 10.1086/170236

    work page doi:10.1086/170236 1991

  7. [7]

    Balona, L. A. 2013, MNRAS, 431, 2240, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt322

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stt322 2013

  8. [8]

    2021, title A Detection Threshold in the Amplitude Spectra Calculated from TESS Time-Series Data, Acta Astronomica, 71, 113, 10.32023/0001-5237/71.2.3

    Baran, A. S., & Koen, C. 2021, AcA, 71, 113, doi: 10.32023/0001-5237/71.2.3

    work page doi:10.32023/0001-5237/71.2.3 2021

  9. [9]

    1990, A&A, 236, 440

    Berthet, S. 1990, A&A, 236, 440

    1990

  10. [10]

    2014, ApJ, 787, 10, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/787/1/10

    Bisterzo, S., Travaglio, C., Gallino, R., Wiescher, M., & K¨ appeler, F. 2014, ApJ, 787, 10, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/787/1/10

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/787/1/10 2014

  11. [11]

    2019, MNRAS, 486, 2075, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz549

    Blanco-Cuaresma, S. 2019, MNRAS, 486, 2075, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz549

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz549 2019

  12. [12]

    2014, A&A, 569, A111, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201423945

    Blanco-Cuaresma, S., Soubiran, C., Heiter, U., & Jofr´ e, P. 2014, A&A, 569, A111, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201423945

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201423945 2014

  13. [13]

    M., Kurtz, D

    Bowman, D. M., Kurtz, D. W., Breger, M., Murphy, S. J., & Holdsworth, D. L. 2016, MNRAS, 460, 1970, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw1153

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw1153 2016

  14. [14]

    2000, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol

    Breger, M. 2000, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 210, Delta Scuti and Related Stars, ed. M. Breger & M. Montgomery, 3

    2000

  15. [15]

    Breger, M., & Pamyatnykh, A. A. 1998, A&A, 332, 958, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9802076

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/9802076 1998

  16. [16]

    M., Goldman, I., & Mazzitelli, I

    Canuto, V. M., Goldman, I., & Mazzitelli, I. 1996, ApJ, 473, 550, doi: 10.1086/178166

    work page doi:10.1086/178166 1996

  17. [17]

    M., Sillanpaa, A., & Takalo, L

    Carraro, G., Ng, Y. K., & Portinari, L. 1998, MNRAS, 296, 1045, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.01460.x

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.01460.x 1998

  18. [18]

    , eprint =

    Cayrel, R., Depagne, E., Spite, M., et al. 2004, A&A, 416, 1117, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20034074

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20034074 2004

  19. [19]

    Chadid, M., Sneden, C., & Preston, G. W. 2017, ApJ, 835, 187, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/835/2/187

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/835/2/187 2017

  20. [20]

    1971, A&A, 14, 24

    Chevalier, C. 1971, A&A, 14, 24

    1971

  21. [21]

    2022, A&A, 667, A155, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202244360

    Choplin, A., Siess, L., & Goriely, S. 2022, A&A, 667, A155, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202244360

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244360 2022

  22. [22]

    2024, A&A, 684, A206, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202348957

    Choplin, A., Siess, L., Goriely, S., & Martinet, S. 2024, A&A, 684, A206, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202348957

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348957 2024

  23. [23]

    2000, A&A, 363, 1081

    Claret, A. 2000, A&A, 363, 1081

    2000

  24. [24]

    Gaia Data Release 3

    Clementini, G., Ripepi, V., Garofalo, A., et al. 2023, A&A, 674, A18, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202243964

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243964 2023

  25. [25]

    P., Magee, N

    Colgan, J., Kilcrease, D. P., Magee, N. H., et al. 2016, ApJ, 817, 116, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/817/2/116

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/817/2/116 2016

  26. [26]

    Crawford, D. L. 1975, AJ, 80, 955, doi: 10.1086/111828

    work page doi:10.1086/111828 1975

  27. [27]

    Crawford, D. L. 1979, AJ, 84, 1858, doi: 10.1086/112617

    work page doi:10.1086/112617 1979

  28. [28]

    7737, Observatory Operations: Strategies, Processes, and Systems III, ed

    Crawford, S. M., Still, M., Schellart, P., et al. 2010, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 7737, Observatory Operations: Strategies, Processes, and Systems III, ed. D. R. Silva, A. B. Peck, & B. T. Soifer, 773725, doi: 10.1117/12.857000 Daszy´ nska, J., & Cugier, H. 2003, Advances in Space Research, 31, 38...

    work page doi:10.1117/12.857000 2010

  29. [29]

    Pamyatnykh, A. A. 2003, A&A, 407, 999, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20030947 Daszy´ nska-Daszkiewicz, J., Pamyatnykh, A. A., Walczak, P., & Szewczuk, W. 2020, MNRAS, 499, 3034, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa3056 Daszy´ nska-Daszkiewicz, J., Walczak, P., Pamyatnykh, A.,

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20030947 2003

  30. [30]

    2023a, ApJL, 942, L38, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acade2 Daszy´ nska-Daszkiewicz, J., Walczak, P., Pamyatnykh, A

    Szewczuk, W., & Niewiadomski, W. 2023a, ApJL, 942, L38, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acade2 Daszy´ nska-Daszkiewicz, J., Walczak, P., Pamyatnykh, A. A., & Szewczuk, W. 2022, MNRAS, 512, 3551, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac646 Daszy´ nska-Daszkiewicz, J., Walczak, P., Szewczuk, W., &

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acade2 2041

  31. [31]

    2023b, MNRAS, 526, 1951, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad2797

    Niewiadomski, W. 2023b, MNRAS, 526, 1951, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad2797

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2797 1951

  32. [32]

    C., Rossi, E

    Derekas, A., Kiss, L. L., Bedding, T. R., et al. 2009, MNRAS, 394, 995, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.14381.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.14381.x 2009

  33. [33]

    1985, A&A, 149, 465

    Diethelm, R. 1985, A&A, 149, 465

    1985

  34. [34]

    1977, AcA, 27, 95

    Dziembowski, W. 1977, AcA, 27, 95

    1977

  35. [35]

    C., Rossi, E

    Dziembowski, W. A., & Pamyatnykh, A. A. 2008, MNRAS, 385, 2061, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.12964.x Gaia Collaboration, Brown, A. G. A., Vallenari, A., et al. 2018, A&A, 616, A1, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201833051 Gaia Collaboration, Vallenari, A., Brown, A. G. A., et al. 2023, A&A, 674, A1, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202243940

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.12964.x 2008

  36. [36]

    2000 , month = feb, pages =

    Girardi, L., Bressan, A., Bertelli, G., & Chiosi, C. 2000, A&AS, 141, 371, doi: 10.1051/aas:2000126

    work page doi:10.1051/aas:2000126 2000

  37. [37]

    O., & Corbally, C

    Gray, R. O., & Corbally, C. J. 1994, AJ, 107, 742, doi: 10.1086/116893

    work page doi:10.1086/116893 1994

  38. [38]

    , year = 2019, month = dec, volume =

    Finkbeiner, D. 2019, ApJ, 887, 93, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab5362 28

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab5362 2019

  39. [39]

    R., Millman, K

    Harris, C. R., Millman, K. J., van der Walt, S. J., et al. 2020, Nature, 585, 357, doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 2020

  40. [40]

    2002, A&A, 392, 619, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20020788 Høg, E., Fabricius, C., Makarov, V

    Heiter, U., Kupka, F., van’t Veer-Menneret, C., et al. 2002, A&A, 392, 619, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20020788 Høg, E., Fabricius, C., Makarov, V. V., et al. 2000, A&A, 355, L27

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20020788 2002

  41. [41]

    The Geneva-Copenhagen survey of the Solar neighbourhood II

    Holmberg, J., Nordstr¨ om, B., & Andersen, J. 2007, A&A, 475, 519, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20077221

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20077221 2007

  42. [42]

    2009, A&A, 501, 941, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200811191

    Holmberg, J., Nordstr¨ om, B., & Andersen, J. 2009, A&A, 501, 941, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200811191

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200811191 2009

  43. [43]

    1988, Michigan Catalogue of Two-dimensional Spectral Types for the HD Stars

    Houk, N., & Smith-Moore, M. 1988, Michigan Catalogue of Two-dimensional Spectral Types for the HD Stars. Volume 4, Declinations -26°.0 to -12°.0., Vol. 4

    1988

  44. [44]

    Hunter, J. D. 2007, Computing in Science and Engineering, 9, 90, doi: 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55

    work page doi:10.1109/mcse.2007.55 2007

  45. [45]

    A., & Rogers, F

    Iglesias, C. A., & Rogers, F. J. 1996, ApJ, 464, 943, doi: 10.1086/177381

    work page doi:10.1086/177381 1996

  46. [46]

    Binarity from proper motion anomaly

    Kervella, P., Arenou, F., Mignard, F., & Th´ evenin, F. 2019, A&A, 623, A72, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834371

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834371 2019

  47. [47]

    Surface brightness relations calibrated by interferometry

    Kervella, P., Th´ evenin, F., Di Folco, E., & S´ egransan, D. 2004, A&A, 426, 297, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20035930

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20035930 2004

  48. [48]

    2010, Mem

    Koester, D. 2010, Mem. Soc. Astron. Italiana, 81, 921

    2010

  49. [49]

    Landstreet, J. D. 1998, A&A, 338, 1041

    1998

  50. [50]

    D., Joner, M., & Rodriguez, E

    Laney, C. D., Joner, M., & Rodriguez, E. 2003, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 292, Interplay of Periodic, Cyclic and Stochastic Variability in Selected Areas of the H-R Diagram, ed. C. Sterken, 203

    2003

  51. [51]

    2018, A&A, 616, A2, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201832727

    Lindegren, L., Hern´ andez, J., Bombrun, A., et al. 2018, A&A, 616, A2, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201832727

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201832727 2018

  52. [52]

    2024, MNRAS, 527, 8234, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad3687

    Mashonkina, L. 2024, MNRAS, 527, 8234, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad3687

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3687 2024

  53. [53]

    2012, MNRAS, 423, 600, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20901.x

    McDonald, I., Zijlstra, A. A., & Boyer, M. L. 2012, MNRAS, 427, 343, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21873.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21873.x 2012

  54. [54]

    O., Griffin, R

    McGahee, C., Gray, R. O., Griffin, R. E. M., Birchard, M., & Day, J. 2020, AJ, 160, 52, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ab974c

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab974c 2020

  55. [55]

    1997, PASP, 109, 1221, doi: 10.1086/133999

    McNamara, D. 1997, PASP, 109, 1221, doi: 10.1086/133999

    work page doi:10.1086/133999 1997

  56. [56]

    2007, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol

    Mohamed, S., & Podsiadlowski, P. 2007, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 372, 15th European Workshop on White Dwarfs, ed. R. Napiwotzki & M. R. Burleigh, 397

    2007

  57. [57]

    Metallicity of RR Lyrae stars from the Gaia Data Release 3 catalogue computed with Machine Learning algorithms.MNRAS2025,536, 2749–2769, [arXiv:astro-ph.SR/2407.05815]

    Muraveva, T., Giannetti, A., Clementini, G., Garofalo, A., & Monti, L. 2025, MNRAS, 536, 2749, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae2679 Paczy´ nski, B. 1969, AcA, 19, 1

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae2679 2025

  58. [58]

    Pamyatnykh, A. A. 1999, AcA, 49, 119

    1999

  59. [59]

    W., van Genderen, A

    Pel, J. W., van Genderen, A. M., & Lub, J. 1981, A&A, 99, L1

    1981

  60. [60]

    Perry, C. L. 1991, PASP, 103, 494, doi: 10.1086/132849

    work page doi:10.1086/132849 1991

  61. [61]

    O., & Christensen-Dalsgaard, J

    Petersen, J. O., & Christensen-Dalsgaard, J. 1996, A&A, 312, 463

    1996

  62. [62]

    O., & Jørgensen, H

    Petersen, J. O., & Jørgensen, H. E. 1972, A&A, 17, 367

    1972

  63. [63]

    Popper, D. M. 1966, AJ, 71, 175, doi: 10.1086/110139

    work page doi:10.1086/110139 1966

  64. [64]

    2000, ApJ, 529, 338, doi: 10.1086/308274

    Richer, J., Michaud, G., & Turcotte, S. 2000, ApJ, 529, 338, doi: 10.1086/308274

    work page doi:10.1086/308274 2000

  65. [65]

    R., Winn, J

    Ricker, G. R., Winn, J. N., Vanderspek, R., et al. 2015, Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems, 1, 014003, doi: 10.1117/1.JATIS.1.1.014003 Rodr´ ıguez, E. 1989, PhD thesis, University of Granada, Spain Rodr´ ıguez, E., & Breger, M. 2001, A&A, 366, 178, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20000205

    work page Pith review doi:10.1117/1.jatis.1.1.014003 2015

  66. [66]

    D., Amado, P

    Rodriguez, E., Laney, C. D., Amado, P. J., Lopez-Gonzalez, M. J., & Joner, M. 2004, Communications in Asteroseismology, 145, 48, doi: 10.1553/cia145s46 Rodr´ ıguez, E., Rolland, A., Costa, V., & Mart´ ın, S. 1995, MNRAS, 277, 965, doi: 10.1093/mnras/277.3.965 Rodr´ ıguez, E., Rolland, A., & Lopez de Coca, P. 1990, Ap&SS, 169, 113, doi: 10.1007/BF00640695

    work page doi:10.1553/cia145s46 2004

  67. [67]

    J., & Nayfonov, A

    Rogers, F. J., & Nayfonov, A. 2002, ApJ, 576, 1064, doi: 10.1086/341894

    work page doi:10.1086/341894 2002

  68. [68]

    , keywords =

    Rogers, F. J., Swenson, F. J., & Iglesias, C. A. 1996, ApJ, 456, 902, doi: 10.1086/176705 R´ o˙ za´ nski, T., Niemczura, E., Lemiesz, J., Posi lek, N., & R´ o˙ za´ nski, P. 2022, A&A, 659, A199, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141480

    work page doi:10.1086/176705 1996

  69. [69]

    1993, AJ, 106, 703, doi: 10.1086/116676

    Sandage, A. 1993, AJ, 106, 703, doi: 10.1086/116676

    work page doi:10.1086/116676 1993

  70. [70]

    Seaton, M. J. 2005, MNRAS, 362, L1, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.00019.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.00019.x 2005

  71. [71]

    1993, A&A, 274, 391

    Smalley, B. 1993, A&A, 274, 391

    1993

  72. [72]

    2016, A&A, 591, A118, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201628497

    Soubiran, C., Le Campion, J.-F., Brouillet, N., & Chemin, L. 2016, A&A, 591, A118, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201628497

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201628497 2016

  73. [73]

    1964, Information Bulletin on Variable Stars, 51, 1

    Strohmeier, W. 1964, Information Bulletin on Variable Stars, 51, 1

    1964

  74. [74]

    Fracassini, L. E. 1989, ApJ, 343, 916, doi: 10.1086/167761 29

    work page doi:10.1086/167761 1989

  75. [75]

    2009, ApJ, 696, 1755, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/696/2/1755 van Leeuwen, F., de Bruijne, J

    Tremblay, P.-E., & Bergeron, P. 2009, ApJ, 696, 1755, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/696/2/1755 van Leeuwen, F., de Bruijne, J. H. J., Arenou, F., et al. 2018, Gaia DR2 documentation,, Gaia DR2 documentation, European Space Agency; Gaia Data Processing and Analysis Consortium

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/696/2/1755 2009