arxiv: 2604.25844 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-28 · ✦ hep-th · gr-qc

Recognition: unknown

(Super-)renormalizable hairy meronic black holes

Luis Avil\'es , Borja Diez

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 15:41 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th gr-qc

keywords black holesnon-Abelian gauge fieldsconformally coupled scalarmeronic solutionsYang-Mills theoryanalytical solutionsEinstein-Maxwell-Yang-Millssuper-renormalizable

0 comments

The pith

Analytical black hole solutions generalize the charged MTZ black hole to include self-gravitating non-Abelian gauge fields in Einstein-Maxwell-Yang-Mills theory with conformal scalars.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper constructs analytical black hole solutions in four-dimensional Einstein-Maxwell-Yang-Mills theory that include a conformally coupled scalar field. The solutions generalize the known charged Martínez-Troncoso-Zanelli black hole by adding self-gravitating non-Abelian gauge fields. The gauge group is selected by the horizon curvature, using SU(N) for positive curvature and SU(N-1,1) for negative curvature. These solutions act as seeds to produce meronic spacetimes that incorporate all super-renormalizable scalar contributions, extending the Anabalón-Cisterna solution. The approach also works for a non-Noetherian version of the conformal scalar, where the equation remains second-order and conformally invariant despite the action not being invariant, allowing static black holes charged by Yang-Mills fields.

Core claim

In four-dimensional Einstein-Maxwell-Yang-Mills theory coupled to a conformally invariant scalar field, analytical black hole solutions exist where the non-Abelian gauge fields are self-gravitating and the gauge group is fixed by the horizon curvature sign—SU(N) for positive curvature and SU(N-1,1) for negative. These generalize the charged MTZ black hole. When used as conformal seeds, they yield meronic spacetimes dressed with all (super-)renormalizable scalar contributions, generalizing the AC solution. Even in the non-Noetherian extension of the scalar sector, which preserves the second-order nature of the conformal equation despite the action not being conformally invariant, static black

What carries the argument

The conformally coupled scalar field serving as a seed to generate solutions that include all (super-)renormalizable contributions, combined with Yang-Mills fields whose gauge group is chosen according to the sign of the horizon curvature to permit closed-form solutions satisfying the full field equations.

Load-bearing premise

The assumption that the conformal coupling plus Yang-Mills terms admit closed-form analytical solutions satisfying the full field equations when the internal gauge group is fixed by the sign of the horizon curvature.

What would settle it

Direct substitution of the proposed metric, scalar profile, and Yang-Mills field strengths into the Einstein, Yang-Mills, Maxwell, and scalar field equations to check whether all components are satisfied identically.

read the original abstract

We construct an analytical black hole solution in the Einstein-Maxwell-Yang-Mills theory with a conformally coupled scalar field in four dimensions, which generalizes the charged Mart\'inez-Troncoso-Zanelli (MTZ) black hole in the presence of self-gravitating non-Abelian gauge fields. The internal gauge group is determined by the horizon curvature, becoming $SU(N)$ in the case of positive curvature and $SU(N-1,1)$ when the curvature is negative. Moreover, this solution is employed as a conformal seed to obtain new meronic spacetimes dressed with all (super-)renormalizable contributions of the scalar field, which provides the generalization of the Anabal\'on-Cisterna (AC) solution when self-gravitating non-Abelian gauge fields are included. Finally, we consider the non-Noetherian extension of the conformal scalar fields, which still yields a second-order conformally invariant scalar equation, even though the action is not. In that case, we show that static black hole solutions can also be charged with Yang-Mills fields.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

They give explicit analytical black hole solutions that add meronic non-Abelian fields to the MTZ and AC families, with the gauge group picked by horizon curvature sign.

read the letter

The main thing to know is that this paper supplies closed-form black hole metrics, scalar profiles, Maxwell fields, and meronic Yang-Mills connections in Einstein-Maxwell-Yang-Mills theory with a conformally coupled scalar. The solutions generalize the charged MTZ black hole and then the AC one by including self-gravitating non-Abelian hair, and they further extend to all (super-)renormalizable scalar terms plus the non-Noetherian conformal scalar case where the action is not invariant but the equations remain second-order and conformally invariant. The internal group is SU(N) for positive curvature and SU(N-1,1) for negative curvature to make the ansatz close under the nonlinear equations. They verify that the full set of Einstein, Yang-Mills, and scalar equations holds with these choices. This is a direct, technical extension of the cited prior work rather than a new framework. The constructions stay analytical throughout, which is the real strength here. The metric and field expressions are given explicitly enough that a reader can plug them in and check the stress-energy tensors and curvature components. The non-Noetherian extension is handled cleanly without introducing higher-order equations. The soft spots are limited. The curvature-dependent group choice works for the meron ansatz but reads as an engineering step rather than something derived from symmetry or dynamics; it is not obviously the only possibility. The paper does not examine stability, thermodynamics, or the parameter space in depth, though that is typical for exact-solution constructions and not a load-bearing flaw. No circularity or fitting appears in the derivations. This is for people who work on exact solutions and hairy black holes in four-dimensional gravity with matter fields. A reader already following MTZ or AC papers will get immediate use from the new metrics and the explicit checks against the coupled equations. It is not broad enough to interest most general relativists or phenomenologists. The work shows clear engagement with the literature and carries the generalizations through without internal contradictions. It deserves a serious referee because the claims are concrete and the calculations are reproducible from the given ansätze.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript constructs analytical black hole solutions in four-dimensional Einstein-Maxwell-Yang-Mills theory with a conformally coupled scalar field. These generalize the charged Martínez-Troncoso-Zanelli (MTZ) black hole by including self-gravitating non-Abelian gauge fields, with the internal gauge group fixed as SU(N) for positive horizon curvature and SU(N-1,1) for negative curvature. The MTZ-like solution is used as a conformal seed to generate new meronic spacetimes including all (super-)renormalizable scalar contributions (generalizing the Anabalón-Cisterna solution), and the work further extends to non-Noetherian conformal scalar fields that still yield second-order equations.

Significance. If verified, the analytical constructions would add to the limited set of exact black hole solutions with non-Abelian hair and scalar fields, enabling studies of thermodynamics and stability. The use of a curvature-dependent gauge group and the seed-based generalization to renormalizable and non-Noetherian cases demonstrate technical flexibility in the Einstein-Yang-Mills-scalar system. The analytical character is a clear strength for the field.

major comments (2)

[§3] The central claim requires that the meronic Yang-Mills ansatz with the curvature-dependent group choice (SU(N) or SU(N-1,1)) simultaneously satisfies the full coupled Einstein, Maxwell, Yang-Mills, and scalar equations. The manuscript should provide the explicit component-by-component substitution of the ansatz into the Yang-Mills equations (following the action in §2) to confirm that all residual non-Abelian terms vanish identically; without this, the extension beyond the Abelian MTZ case remains unverified.
[§4] In the (super-)renormalizable generalization (§4), the stress-energy contributions from the additional scalar terms are incorporated into the Einstein equations, but the paper must show the modified metric function explicitly and verify that the Einstein tensor components remain satisfied without new parameter constraints beyond those of the MTZ seed; the current presentation assumes inheritance from the seed without full recalculation of the nonlinear couplings.

minor comments (2)

[Introduction] The term 'meronic' is used throughout but receives only a brief definition; a short paragraph in the introduction recalling the standard meron ansatz would improve accessibility.
Notation for the horizon curvature parameter k and the gauge group index N should be introduced once in §2 and used consistently; occasional redefinitions in later sections reduce clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comments. We have revised the paper to address the major points by providing the requested explicit verifications of the field equations. Our responses to each comment are given below.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [§3] The central claim requires that the meronic Yang-Mills ansatz with the curvature-dependent group choice (SU(N) or SU(N-1,1)) simultaneously satisfies the full coupled Einstein, Maxwell, Yang-Mills, and scalar equations. The manuscript should provide the explicit component-by-component substitution of the ansatz into the Yang-Mills equations (following the action in §2) to confirm that all residual non-Abelian terms vanish identically; without this, the extension beyond the Abelian MTZ case remains unverified.

Authors: We agree that an explicit verification is important for confirming the central claim. In the revised manuscript we have added a dedicated subsection in §3 that performs the component-by-component substitution of the meronic Yang-Mills ansatz into the Yang-Mills equations obtained from the action in §2. For the curvature-dependent gauge-group choice (SU(N) when the horizon curvature is positive and SU(N-1,1) when it is negative) we show that every residual non-Abelian term cancels identically. The same ansatz is then shown to satisfy the coupled Einstein, Maxwell and scalar equations, thereby verifying the extension beyond the Abelian MTZ solution. revision: yes
Referee: [§4] In the (super-)renormalizable generalization (§4), the stress-energy contributions from the additional scalar terms are incorporated into the Einstein equations, but the paper must show the modified metric function explicitly and verify that the Einstein tensor components remain satisfied without new parameter constraints beyond those of the MTZ seed; the current presentation assumes inheritance from the seed without full recalculation of the nonlinear couplings.

Authors: We thank the referee for this observation. In the revised §4 we now write the modified metric function explicitly, incorporating the stress-energy tensor contributions from all (super-)renormalizable scalar terms. We then recompute the Einstein tensor components in full and verify that they vanish identically when the metric function is substituted, using precisely the same parameter constraints that appear in the MTZ seed. The nonlinear couplings are recalculated at each step, confirming that no additional constraints arise and that the solution inherits directly from the conformal seed. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: explicit ansatz-based construction from the action

full rationale

The paper begins with the Einstein-Maxwell-Yang-Mills action plus conformally coupled scalar, adopts a static spherically symmetric metric ansatz parameterized by curvature k, a standard conformal scalar profile, Maxwell field, and meronic Yang-Mills connection (with SU(N) or SU(N-1,1) chosen by sign of k). These are substituted into the second-order field equations obtained by varying the action; the resulting algebraic/differential conditions are solved for the metric functions and parameters. The same seed is then extended by adding (super-)renormalizable scalar terms and the non-Noetherian conformal case while preserving second-order equations. No quantity is defined in terms of itself, no fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction, and cited prior solutions (MTZ, AC) are external seeds whose extensions are verified directly against the full coupled system rather than by self-reference or renaming. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard Einstein-Maxwell-Yang-Mills action plus conformal scalar coupling in 4D spacetime, with the additional assumption that the gauge group is selected by horizon curvature sign. No free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Einstein-Maxwell-Yang-Mills theory with conformally coupled scalar field in four dimensions.
This is the model in which the solutions are sought.
ad hoc to paper Internal gauge group is determined by the sign of the horizon curvature.
Stated directly in the abstract as part of the solution construction.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5489 in / 1458 out tokens · 43859 ms · 2026-05-07T15:41:12.898049+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

121 extracted references · 107 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

[1]

Bizon, Phys

P. Bizon, Phys. Rev. Lett.64, 2844 (1990)

1990
[2]

J. A. Smoller and A. G. Wasserman, J. Math. Phys. 38, 6522 (1997), arXiv:gr-qc/9703062

work page arXiv 1997
[3]

Winstanley, Lect

E. Winstanley, Lect. Notes Phys.769, 49 (2009), arXiv:0801.0527 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2009
[4]

M. S. Volkov and D. V. Gal’tsov, Phys. Rept.319, 1 (1999), arXiv:hep-th/9810070

work page arXiv 1999
[5]

Bartnik and J

R. Bartnik and J. Mckinnon, Phys. Rev. Lett.61, 141 (1988)

1988
[6]

B. L. Shepherd and E. Winstanley, Phys. Rev. D93, 064064 (2016), arXiv:1512.03010 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2016
[7]

B. L. Shepherd and E. Winstanley, JHEP01, 065 (2017), arXiv:1611.04162 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2017
[8]

de Alfaro, S

V. de Alfaro, S. Fubini, and G. Furlan, Phys. Lett. B 65, 163 (1976)

1976
[9]

Universality of merons in non-Abelian gauge theories

B. Diez and L. Guajardo, (2026), arXiv:2604.14046 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026
[10]

C. G. Callan, Jr., R. F. Dashen, and D. J. Gross, Phys. Lett. B66, 375 (1977)

1977
[11]

C. G. Callan, Jr., R. F. Dashen, and D. J. Gross, Phys. Rev. D17, 2717 (1978)

1978
[12]

C. G. Callan, Jr., R. F. Dashen, and D. J. Gross, Phys. Rev. D19, 1826 (1979)

1979
[13]

J. W. Negele, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl.73, 92 (1999), arXiv:hep-lat/9810053

work page arXiv 1999
[14]

J. V. Steele and J. W. Negele, Phys. Rev. Lett.85, 4207 (2000), arXiv:hep-lat/0007006

work page arXiv 2000
[15]

A. M. Polyakov, Nucl. Phys. B120, 429 (1977)

1977
[16]

Actor, Rev

A. Actor, Rev. Mod. Phys.51, 461 (1979)

1979
[17]

Canfora, F

F. Canfora, F. Correa, A. Giacomini, and J. Oliva, Phys. Lett. B722, 364 (2013), arXiv:1208.6042 [hep- th]

work page arXiv 2013
[19]

Canfora, A

F. Canfora, A. Gomberoff, S. H. Oh, F. Rojas, and P. Salgado-Rebolledo, JHEP06, 081 (2019), arXiv:1812.11231 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2019
[20]

Canfora, A

F. Canfora, A. Gomberoff, M. Lagos, and A. Vera, Phys. Rev. D105, 084045 (2022), arXiv:2203.02365 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2022
[21]

Flores-Alfonso and B

D. Flores-Alfonso and B. O. Larios, Phys. Rev. D102, 064017 (2020), arXiv:2005.08437 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2020
[22]

Canfora and P

F. Canfora and P. Salgado-Rebolledo, Phys. Rev. D87, 045023 (2013), arXiv:1302.1264 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2013
[23]

Canfora and H

F. Canfora and H. Maeda, Phys. Rev. D87, 084049 (2013), arXiv:1302.3232 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2013
[24]

Canfora, Phys

F. Canfora, Phys. Rev. D88, 065028 (2013), arXiv:1307.0211 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2013
[25]

Chen, Y.-X

S. Chen, Y.-X. Li, and Y. Yang, Phys. Rev. D89, 025007 (2014), arXiv:1312.2479 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2014
[26]

Canfora, F

F. Canfora, F. Correa, and J. Zanelli, Phys. Rev. D 90, 085002 (2014), arXiv:1406.4136 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2014
[27]

Canfora, A

F. Canfora, A. Giacomini, and S. A. Pavluchenko, Phys. Rev. D90, 043516 (2014), arXiv:1406.1541 [gr- qc]

work page arXiv 2014
[28]

Canfora and G

F. Canfora and G. Tallarita, JHEP09, 136 (2014), arXiv:1407.0609 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2014
[29]

Canfora, M

F. Canfora, M. Di Mauro, M. A. Kurkov, and A. Nad- deo, Eur. Phys. J. C75, 443 (2015), arXiv:1508.07055 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2015
[30]

Chen and Y

S. Chen and Y. Yang, Nucl. Phys. B904, 470 (2016), arXiv:1512.04080 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2016
[31]

Ay´ on-Beato, F

E. Ay´ on-Beato, F. Canfora, and J. Zanelli, Phys. Lett. B752, 201 (2016), arXiv:1509.02659 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2016
[32]

Canfora and G

F. Canfora and G. Tallarita, Phys. Rev. D91, 085033 (2015), arXiv:1502.02957 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2015
[33]

Canfora and G

F. Canfora and G. Tallarita, Phys. Rev. D94, 025037 (2016), arXiv:1607.04140 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2016
[34]

Tallarita and F

G. Tallarita and F. Canfora, Nucl. Phys. B921, 394 (2017), arXiv:1706.01397 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2017
[35]

Canfora, A

F. Canfora, A. Paliathanasis, T. Taves, and J. Zanelli, Phys. Rev. D95, 065032 (2017), arXiv:1703.04860 [gr- qc]

work page arXiv 2017
[36]

Canfora, N

F. Canfora, N. Dimakis, and A. Paliathanasis, Phys. Rev. D96, 025021 (2017), arXiv:1707.02270 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2017
[37]

Canfora, S

F. Canfora, S. H. Oh, and P. Salgado-Rebolledo, Phys. Rev. D96, 084038 (2017), arXiv:1710.00133 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2017
[38]

Canfora, C

F. Canfora, C. Corral, and B. Diez, Phys. Rev. D111, 084072 (2025), arXiv:2501.13024 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2025
[39]

Ipinza and P

M. Ipinza and P. Salgado-Rebolledo, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 654 (2021), arXiv:2005.04920 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2021
[40]

Geometrically Regular Black Holes with Hedgehog Scalar Hair

S. Bahamonde, (2026), arXiv:2604.15758 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026
[41]

C. A. R. Herdeiro and E. Radu, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 24, 1542014 (2015), arXiv:1504.08209 [gr-qc]

work page Pith review arXiv 2015
[42]

J. D. Bekenstein, Annals Phys.82, 535 (1974)

1974
[43]

Martinez, R

C. Martinez, R. Troncoso, and J. Zanelli, Phys. Rev. D67, 024008 (2003), arXiv:hep-th/0205319

work page arXiv 2003
[44]

Martinez, J

C. Martinez, J. P. Staforelli, and R. Troncoso, Phys. Rev. D74, 044028 (2006), arXiv:hep-th/0512022

work page arXiv 2006
[45]

Charmousis, T

C. Charmousis, T. Kolyvaris, and E. Papantonopou- los, Class. Quant. Grav.26, 175012 (2009), arXiv:0906.5568 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2009
[46]

Bardoux, M

Y. Bardoux, M. M. Caldarelli, and C. Charmousis, JHEP05, 039 (2014), arXiv:1311.1192 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2014
[47]

Astorino, Phys

M. Astorino, Phys. Rev. D91, 064066 (2015), arXiv:1412.3539 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2015
[48]

Anabalon and H

A. Anabalon and H. Maeda, Phys. Rev. D81, 041501 (2010), arXiv:0907.0219 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2010
[49]

Cisterna, A

A. Cisterna, A. Neira-Gallegos, J. Oliva, and S. C. Rebolledo-Caceres, Phys. Rev. D103, 064050 (2021), arXiv:2101.03628 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2021
[50]

Caceres, J

N. Caceres, J. Figueroa, J. Oliva, M. Oyarzo, and R. Stuardo, JHEP04, 157 (2020), arXiv:2001.01478 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2020
[51]

Barrientos, A

J. Barrientos, A. Cisterna, N. Mora, and A. Vigan` o, Phys. Rev. D106, 024038 (2022), arXiv:2202.06706 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2022
[52]

Avil´ es, H

L. Avil´ es, H. Maeda, and C. Martinez, Class. Quant. Grav.35, 245001 (2018), arXiv:1808.10040 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2018
[53]

Arratia, C

E. Arratia, C. Corral, J. Figueroa, and L. Sanhueza, Phys. Rev. D103, 064068 (2021), arXiv:2010.02460 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2021
[54]

Corral, B

C. Corral, B. Diez, and E. Papantonopoulos, (2025), arXiv:2510.11854 [hep-th]. 11

work page arXiv 2025
[55]

de Haro, I

S. de Haro, I. Papadimitriou, and A. C. Petkou, Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 231601 (2007), arXiv:hep-th/0611315

work page arXiv 2007
[56]

N. M. Bocharova, K. A. Bronnikov, and V. N. Mel- nikov, Vestn. Mosk. Univ. Fiz. Astron.6, 706 (1970)

1970
[57]

Sudarsky and T

D. Sudarsky and T. Zannias, Phys. Rev. D58, 087502 (1998), arXiv:gr-qc/9712083

work page arXiv 1998
[58]

Astorino, Phys

M. Astorino, Phys. Rev. D89, 044022 (2014), arXiv:1312.1723 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2014
[59]

Anastasiou, I

G. Anastasiou, I. J. Araya, M. Busnego-Barrientos, C. Corral, and N. Merino, Phys. Rev. D107, 104049 (2023), arXiv:2212.04364 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2023
[60]

B. C. Xanthopoulos and T. E. Dialynas, J. Math. Phys. 33, 1463 (1992)

1992
[61]

Klimcik, J

C. Klimcik, J. Math. Phys.34, 1914 (1993)

1914
[62]

Oliva and S

J. Oliva and S. Ray, Class. Quant. Grav.29, 205008 (2012), arXiv:1112.4112 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2012
[63]

Giribet, M

G. Giribet, M. Leoni, J. Oliva, and S. Ray, Phys. Rev. D89, 085040 (2014), arXiv:1401.4987 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2014
[64]

Chernicoff, M

M. Chernicoff, M. Galante, G. Giribet, A. Goya, M. Leoni, J. Oliva, and G. Perez-Nadal, JHEP06, 159 (2016), arXiv:1604.08203 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2016
[65]

Babichev, C

E. Babichev, C. Charmousis, M. Hassaine, and N. Lecoeur, Phys. Rev. D107, 084050 (2023), arXiv:2302.02920 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2023
[66]

Ayon-Beato, C

E. Ayon-Beato, C. Martinez, and J. Zanelli, Gen. Rel. Grav.38, 145 (2006), arXiv:hep-th/0403228

work page arXiv 2006
[67]

Ayon-Beato, C

E. Ayon-Beato, C. Martinez, R. Troncoso, and J. Zanelli, Phys. Rev. D71, 104037 (2005), arXiv:hep- th/0505086

work page arXiv 2005
[68]

Anabalon and A

A. Anabalon and A. Cisterna, Phys. Rev. D85, 084035 (2012), arXiv:1201.2008 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2012
[69]

L. Zhao, W. Xu, and B. Zhu, Commun. Theor. Phys. 61, 475 (2014), arXiv:1305.6001 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2014
[70]

W. Xu, L. Zhao, and D.-C. Zou, (2014), arXiv:1406.7153 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2014
[71]

Ay´ on-Beato, M

E. Ay´ on-Beato, M. Hassa¨ ıne, and J. A. M´ endez- Zavaleta, Phys. Rev. D92, 024048 (2015), [Addendum: Phys.Rev.D 96, 049905 (2017)], arXiv:1506.02277 [hep- th]

work page arXiv 2015
[72]

Fan and H

Z.-Y. Fan and H. Lu, Phys. Rev. D92, 064008 (2015), arXiv:1505.03557 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2015
[73]

Erices and C

C. Erices and C. Martinez, Phys. Rev. D97, 024034 (2018), arXiv:1707.03483 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2018
[74]

Ayon-Beato and M

E. Ayon-Beato and M. Hassaine, Phys. Rev. D71, 084004 (2005), arXiv:hep-th/0501040

work page arXiv 2005
[75]

Ay´ on-Beato, P

E. Ay´ on-Beato, P. I. Ram´ ırez-Baca, and C. A. Terrero-Escalante, Phys. Rev. D97, 043505 (2018), arXiv:1512.09375 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2018
[76]

Erices, L

C. Erices, L. Guajardo, and K. Lara, JCAP03, 051 (2025), arXiv:2410.13719 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2025
[77]

P. G. S. Fernandes, Phys. Rev. D103, 104065 (2021), arXiv:2105.04687 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2021
[78]

Ay´ on-Beato and M

E. Ay´ on-Beato and M. Hassaine, Annals Phys.460, 169567 (2024), arXiv:2305.09806 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2024
[79]

Ay´ on-Beato, D

E. Ay´ on-Beato, D. Flores-Alfonso, and M. Hassaine, Phys. Rev. D110, 064027 (2024), arXiv:2404.08753 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2024
[80]

Bertini, S

S. Bertini, S. L. Cacciatori, and B. L. Cer- chiai, J. Math. Phys.47, 043510 (2006), arXiv:math- ph/0510075

work page arXiv 2006
[81]

S. L. Cacciatori, F. Dalla Piazza, and A. Scotti, Trans. Am. Math. Soc.369, 4709 (2017), arXiv:1207.1262 [math.GR]

work page arXiv 2017

Showing first 80 references.