arxiv: 2604.26123 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-28 · ✦ hep-ph

Recognition: unknown

When JIMWLK evolution really matters: the example of incoherent diffraction

T. Lappi , D.N. Triantafyllopoulos

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 15:28 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph

keywords JIMWLKGaussian approximationincoherent diffractioncolor glass condensateWilson lineshigh energy scatteringphoton-nucleus collisionssaturation

0 comments

The pith

JIMWLK evolution leads to larger cross sections than Gaussian approximation for incoherent diffraction

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that in high energy scattering described by the Color Glass Condensate, the JIMWLK equation for Wilson line evolution must be used instead of the Gaussian Approximation when dealing with correlators that start with four gluon exchanges. It uses incoherent diffraction in photon-nucleus collisions to demonstrate that the approximation underestimates the cross sections. This discrepancy holds in weak scattering and when unitarity corrections become important. The full JIMWLK calculation gives systematically larger results in all regimes of interest. This matters for accurate modeling of gluon saturation effects in nuclear collisions.

Core claim

The JIMWLK evolution of Wilson lines leads to cross sections for incoherent diffraction which are systematically larger than those from the Gaussian Approximation in all kinematic regimes, because the approximation fails for four-gluon correlators while working for two-gluon ones.

What carries the argument

The JIMWLK evolution equation applied to four-point Wilson line correlators in the Color Glass Condensate, which cannot be approximated by a Gaussian for processes like incoherent diffraction.

If this is right

The Gaussian Approximation underestimates cross sections for incoherent diffraction in photon-nucleus collisions.
The difference between JIMWLK and GA appears in the weak scattering limit and persists with unitarity corrections.
Accurate predictions for high-energy nuclear collisions require the full JIMWLK treatment for multi-gluon correlators.
This affects the interpretation of diffraction data in terms of gluon distributions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The results may indicate that non-Gaussian correlations in the gluon fields are important for a wider class of observables.
Future experiments at electron-ion colliders could test these predictions by measuring diffraction cross sections.
Similar considerations could apply to other high-energy processes involving higher-order gluon exchanges in nuclei.

Load-bearing premise

That the observed failure of the Gaussian Approximation for four-gluon correlators is general and not specific to the chosen initial conditions or numerical implementation of the JIMWLK evolution.

What would settle it

A measurement of the incoherent diffractive photon-nucleus cross section that is closer to the smaller Gaussian Approximation value rather than the larger JIMWLK result would falsify the claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.26123 by D.N. Triantafyllopoulos, T. Lappi.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: FIG. 1 view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2 view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3 view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4 view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5 view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: FIG. 6 view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: FIG. 7 view at source ↗

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: FIG. 8 view at source ↗

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: FIG. 9 view at source ↗

**Figure 10.** Figure 10: FIG. 10 view at source ↗

read the original abstract

We consider high energy scattering in the effective theory of the Color Glass Condensate. The most convenient degrees of freedom are Wilson lines encoding multiple gluon exchanges, whose evolution with energy follows the JIMWLK equation. Instead of using the latter, very often one resorts to a Gaussian Approximation (GA), which is known to be remarkably accurate in describing a wide class of multi-gluon correlators whose expansion in the weak scattering limit starts with an exchange of only two gluons. Here we demonstrate, both analytically and numerically, that such an approximation is not valid for correlators which start with an exchange of four gluons. As a main example, we focus on incoherent diffraction in photon-nucleus collisions and we show that the discrepancy between the JIMWLK and the GA results is driven by weak scattering and further persists in the regime where unitarity corrections begin to become important. The JIMWLK calculation leads to cross sections which are systematically larger in all kinematic regimes of interest.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The Gaussian Approximation to JIMWLK fails for incoherent diffraction because those observables start with four-gluon correlators, and the full evolution gives systematically larger cross sections.

read the letter

The main thing to know is that this paper demonstrates the Gaussian Approximation to JIMWLK evolution breaks down for incoherent diffraction in photon-nucleus collisions. The reason is that these observables are built from correlators that start with four-gluon exchanges in the weak limit, where the approximation is known to be less reliable. The authors provide an analytic argument showing why the GA works for two-gluon correlators but not for four-gluon ones. They then run numerical JIMWLK evolution and compare to the GA, finding that the full evolution gives larger cross sections in all regimes they study. This difference begins in the dilute limit and continues when saturation effects appear. The result is new in the sense that it applies the known limitation to a practical observable and quantifies it. The paper does well by focusing on a specific example that matters for extracting gluon saturation from data. It avoids fitting and shows the effect is systematic. This kind of check helps the field know when shortcuts are safe. On the downside, the strength of the numerical evidence depends on how carefully the initial conditions are set and how the evolution is discretized. The abstract suggests they have control over this, but the size of the discrepancy needs clear error bars in the full text. Still, the central claim looks plausible and not circular. This is relevant for theorists working on CGC phenomenology at the LHC or future EIC. Readers who implement these calculations in their own work will want to account for this. It is solid enough to deserve a serious referee, even if revisions are needed on the numerics presentation. I recommend sending it for peer review.

Referee Report

0 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript demonstrates analytically that the Gaussian Approximation (GA) to the JIMWLK equation fails for multi-gluon correlators whose weak-scattering expansion begins at four-gluon exchange. Using incoherent diffraction in photon-nucleus collisions as the main example, it provides numerical evidence that full JIMWLK evolution produces systematically larger cross sections than the GA across kinematic regimes from weak scattering through the onset of unitarity corrections.

Significance. If the central results hold, the work is significant because it identifies a concrete class of observables where the commonly employed GA breaks down, thereby clarifying when the full JIMWLK evolution must be retained. The analytic demonstration combined with parameter-free numerical comparisons strengthens the case for using JIMWLK in diffractive calculations relevant to the EIC and LHC. The absence of fitted parameters and the direct head-to-head comparison are particular strengths.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our manuscript, the recognition of its significance for EIC and LHC phenomenology, and the recommendation to accept. We appreciate the emphasis placed on the parameter-free nature of the comparison and the analytic demonstration that the Gaussian Approximation fails for four-gluon correlators.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity identified

full rationale

The paper compares the full JIMWLK evolution equation against the Gaussian Approximation for four-gluon correlators in the context of incoherent diffraction. The analytical demonstration that the GA fails for correlators whose weak-scattering expansion begins at four-gluon exchange follows directly from the explicit definitions of the Wilson-line correlators and the functional form of the GA; it does not presuppose the numerical outcome. The numerical results are obtained by solving the JIMWLK equation with stated initial conditions and computing the cross sections, without any parameter fitting that would force agreement or disagreement with the GA. No load-bearing step reduces to a self-citation chain, a fitted input renamed as a prediction, or an ansatz smuggled via prior work. The derivation remains self-contained and externally falsifiable through the explicit evolution equations and the reported kinematic regimes.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work rests on the standard Color Glass Condensate framework and the JIMWLK equation as the correct evolution; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)

domain assumption JIMWLK equation correctly describes the rapidity evolution of Wilson-line correlators in the Color Glass Condensate.
Invoked as the reference evolution against which the Gaussian Approximation is tested.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5470 in / 1198 out tokens · 50583 ms · 2026-05-07T15:28:15.046378+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 64 canonical work pages

[1]

The BFKL Equation from the Wilson Renormalization Group

J. Jalilian-Marian, A. Kovner, A. Leonidov and H. Weigert,The BFKL equation from the Wilson renormalization group,Nucl. Phys. B504(1997) 415 [arXiv:hep-ph/9701284]. 33

work page Pith review arXiv 1997
[2]

The Wilson renormalization group for low x physics: towards the high density regime

J. Jalilian-Marian, A. Kovner, A. Leonidov and H. Weigert,The Wilson renormalization group for low x physics: Towards the high density regime,Phys. Rev. D59(1998) 014014 [arXiv:hep-ph/9706377]

work page Pith review arXiv 1998
[3]

Unitarity at small Bjorken x

H. Weigert,Unitarity at small Bjorken x,Nucl. Phys. A703(2002) 823 [arXiv:hep-ph/0004044]

work page Pith review arXiv 2002
[4]

Nonlinear Gluon Evolution in the Color Glass Condensate: I

E. Iancu, A. Leonidov and L. D. McLerran,Nonlinear gluon evolution in the color glass condensate. 1.,Nucl. Phys. A692(2001) 583 [arXiv:hep-ph/0011241]

work page Pith review arXiv 2001
[5]

Iancu, A

E. Iancu, A. Leonidov and L. D. McLerran,The Renormalization group equation for the color glass condensate,Phys. Lett. B510(2001) 133 [arXiv:hep-ph/0102009]

work page arXiv 2001
[6]

Operator expansion for high-energy scattering

I. Balitsky,Operator expansion for high-energy scattering,Nucl. Phys. B463(1996) 99 [arXiv:hep-ph/9509348]

work page Pith review arXiv 1996
[7]

High-Energy QCD and Wilson Lines

I. Balitsky,High-energy QCD and Wilson lines,arXiv:hep-ph/0101042

work page Pith review arXiv
[8]

Y. V. Kovchegov,Small x F(2) structure function of a nucleus including multiple pomeron exchanges,Phys. Rev. D60(1999) 034008 [arXiv:hep-ph/9901281]

work page Pith review arXiv 1999
[9]

Y. V. Kovchegov,Unitarization of the BFKL pomeron on a nucleus,Phys. Rev. D61(2000) 074018 [arXiv:hep-ph/9905214]

work page Pith review arXiv 2000
[10]

Iancu, K

E. Iancu, K. Itakura and L. McLerran,A Gaussian effective theory for gluon saturation,Nucl. Phys. A724(2003) 181 [arXiv:hep-ph/0212123]

work page arXiv 2003
[11]

Y. V. Kovchegov, J. Kuokkanen, K. Rummukainen and H. Weigert,Subleading-N(c) corrections in non-linear small-x evolution,Nucl. Phys. A823(2009) 47 [arXiv:0812.3238 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2009
[12]

Iancu and D

E. Iancu and D. N. Triantafyllopoulos,Higher-point correlations from the JIMWLK evolution, JHEP11(2011) 105 [arXiv:1109.0302 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2011
[13]

Iancu and D

E. Iancu and D. N. Triantafyllopoulos,JIMWLK evolution in the Gaussian approximation, JHEP04(2012) 025 [arXiv:1112.1104 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2012
[14]

Dumitru, J

A. Dumitru, J. Jalilian-Marian, T. Lappi, B. Schenke and R. Venugopalan,Renormalization group evolution of multi-gluon correlators in high energy QCD,Phys. Lett. B706(2011) 219 [arXiv:1108.4764 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2011
[15]

L. D. McLerran and R. Venugopalan,Computing quark and gluon distribution functions for very large nuclei,Phys. Rev. D49(1994) 2233 [arXiv:hep-ph/9309289]

work page Pith review arXiv 1994
[16]

L. D. McLerran and R. Venugopalan,Gluon distribution functions for very large nuclei at small transverse momentum,Phys. Rev. D49(1994) 3352 [arXiv:hep-ph/9311205]

work page Pith review arXiv 1994
[17]

L. D. McLerran and R. Venugopalan,Green’s functions in the color field of a large nucleus, Phys. Rev. D50(1994) 2225 [arXiv:hep-ph/9402335]

work page arXiv 1994
[18]

J. P. Blaizot, F. Gelis and R. Venugopalan,High-energy pA collisions in the color glass condensate approach. 2. Quark production,Nucl. Phys. A743(2004) 57 [arXiv:hep-ph/0402257]

work page arXiv 2004
[19]

Weigert,Evolution at small x(bj): The Color glass condensate,Prog

H. Weigert,Evolution at small x(bj): The Color glass condensate,Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.55 (2005) 461 [arXiv:hep-ph/0501087]

work page arXiv 2005
[20]

Dominguez, C

F. Dominguez, C. Marquet and B. Wu,On multiple scatterings of mesons in hot and cold QCD matter,Nucl. Phys. A823(2009) 99 [arXiv:0812.3878 [nucl-th]]. 34

work page arXiv 2009
[21]

Universality of Unintegrated Gluon Distributions at small x

F. Dominguez, C. Marquet, B.-W. Xiao and F. Yuan,Universality of Unintegrated Gluon Distributions at small x,Phys. Rev. D83(2011) 105005 [arXiv:1101.0715 [hep-ph]]

work page Pith review arXiv 2011
[22]

Lappi and H

T. Lappi and H. Mantysaari,Forward dihadron correlations in deuteron-gold collisions with the Gaussian approximation of JIMWLK,Nucl. Phys. A908(2013) 51 [arXiv:1209.2853 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2013
[23]

Lappi, H

T. Lappi, H. M¨ antysaari and A. Ramnath,Next-to-leading order Balitsky-Kovchegov equation beyond largeN c,Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 074027 [arXiv:2007.00751 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2020
[24]

M¨ antysaari, N

H. M¨ antysaari, N. Mueller, F. Salazar and B. Schenke,Multigluon Correlations and Evidence of Saturation from Dijet Measurements at an Electron-Ion Collider,Phys. Rev. Lett.124(2020) 112301 [arXiv:1912.05586 [nucl-th]]

work page arXiv 2020
[25]

Marquet, E

C. Marquet, E. Petreska and C. Roiesnel,Transverse-momentum-dependent gluon distributions from JIMWLK evolution,JHEP10(2016) 065 [arXiv:1608.02577 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2016
[26]

S. Cali, K. Cichy, P. Korcyl, P. Kotko, K. Kutak and C. Marquet,On systematic effects in the numerical solutions of the JIMWLK equation,Eur. Phys. J. C81(2021) 663 [arXiv:2104.14254 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2021
[27]

Lappi,Gluon spectrum in the glasma from JIMWLK evolution,Phys

T. Lappi,Gluon spectrum in the glasma from JIMWLK evolution,Phys. Lett. B703(2011) 325 [arXiv:1105.5511 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2011
[28]

Schlichting and B

S. Schlichting and B. Schenke,The shape of the proton at high energies,Phys. Lett. B739 (2014) 313 [arXiv:1407.8458 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2014
[29]

Schenke, S

B. Schenke, S. Schlichting and P. Singh,Rapidity dependence of initial state geometry and momentum correlations in p+Pb collisions,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 094023 [arXiv:2201.08864 [nucl-th]]

work page arXiv 2022
[30]

M¨ antysaari and P

H. M¨ antysaari and P. Singh,Energy dependence of the deformed nuclear structure at small-x, Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) 1449 [arXiv:2411.14934 [nucl-th]]

work page arXiv 2025
[31]

M¨ antysaari, N

H. M¨ antysaari, N. Mueller and B. Schenke,Diffractive Dijet Production and Wigner Distributions from the Color Glass Condensate,Phys. Rev. D99(2019) 074004 [arXiv:1902.05087 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2019
[32]

Lappi, B

T. Lappi, B. Schenke, S. Schlichting and R. Venugopalan,Tracing the origin of azimuthal gluon correlations in the color glass condensate,JHEP01(2016) 061 [arXiv:1509.03499 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2016
[33]

E. A. Kuraev, L. N. Lipatov and V. S. Fadin,The Pomeranchuk singularity in nonabelian gauge theories,Sov. Phys. JETP45(1977) 199

1977
[34]

I. I. Balitsky and L. N. Lipatov,The Pomeranchuk Singularity in Quantum Chromodynamics, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys.28(1978) 822

1978
[35]

Demirci, T

S. Demirci, T. Lappi and S. Schlichting,Proton hot spots and exclusive vector meson production,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 074025 [arXiv:2206.05207 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2022
[36]

A. H. Mueller,Soft gluons in the infinite momentum wave function and the BFKL pomeron, Nucl. Phys. B415(1994) 373

1994
[37]

Jalilian-Marian and Y

J. Jalilian-Marian and Y. V. Kovchegov,Inclusive two-gluon and valence quark-gluon production in DIS and pA,Phys. Rev. D70(2004) 114017 [arXiv:hep-ph/0405266]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 71, 079901 (2005)]. 35

work page arXiv 2004
[38]

Blaizot, E

J.-P. Blaizot, E. Iancu and H. Weigert,Nonlinear gluon evolution in path integral form,Nucl. Phys. A713(2003) 441 [arXiv:hep-ph/0206279]

work page arXiv 2003
[39]

Rummukainen and H

K. Rummukainen and H. Weigert,Universal features of JIMWLK and BK evolution at small x, Nucl. Phys. A739(2004) 183 [arXiv:hep-ph/0309306]

work page arXiv 2004
[40]

Lappi and H

T. Lappi and H. M¨ antysaari,On the running coupling in the JIMWLK equation,Eur. Phys. J. C73(2013) 2307 [arXiv:1212.4825 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2013
[41]

Lappi, A

T. Lappi, A. Ramnath, K. Rummukainen and H. Weigert,JIMWLK evolution of the odderon, Phys. Rev. D94(2016) 054014 [arXiv:1606.00551 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2016
[42]

Alvioli, G

M. Alvioli, G. Soyez and D. N. Triantafyllopoulos,Testing the Gaussian Approximation to the JIMWLK Equation,Phys. Rev. D87(2013) 014016 [arXiv:1212.1656 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2013
[43]

Marquet and H

C. Marquet and H. Weigert,New observables to test the Color Glass Condensate beyond the large-N c limit,Nucl. Phys. A843(2010) 68 [arXiv:1003.0813 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2010
[44]

Rodriguez-Aguilar, D

B. Rodriguez-Aguilar, D. N. Triantafyllopoulos and S. Y. Wei,Incoherent diffractive dijet production in electron DIS off nuclei at high energy,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 114007 [arXiv:2302.01106 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2023
[45]

Rodriguez-Aguilar, D

B. Rodriguez-Aguilar, D. N. Triantafyllopoulos and S. Y. Wei,Incoherent diffractive production of jets in electron DIS off nuclei at high energy,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 074018 [arXiv:2407.17665 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2024
[46]

Lappi and H

T. Lappi and H. Mantysaari,Incoherent diffractive J/Psi-production in high energy nuclear DIS,Phys. Rev. C83(2011) 065202 [arXiv:1011.1988 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2011
[47]

M¨ antysaari and B

H. M¨ antysaari and B. Schenke,Evidence of strong proton shape fluctuations from incoherent diffraction,Phys. Rev. Lett.117(2016) 052301 [arXiv:1603.04349 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2016
[48]

Iancu and D

E. Iancu and D. N. Triantafyllopoulos,A Langevin equation for high energy evolution with pomeron loops,Nucl. Phys. A756(2005) 419 [arXiv:hep-ph/0411405]

work page arXiv 2005
[49]

Iancu and D

E. Iancu and D. N. Triantafyllopoulos,Non-linear QCD evolution with improved triple-pomeron vertices,Phys. Lett. B610(2005) 253 [arXiv:hep-ph/0501193]

work page arXiv 2005
[50]

Kovner and M

A. Kovner and M. Lublinsky,In pursuit of pomeron loops: The JIMWLK equation and the Wess-Zumino term,Phys. Rev.D71(2005) 085004 [arXiv:hep-ph/0501198]

work page arXiv 2005
[51]

Hatta, E

Y. Hatta, E. Iancu, C. Marquet, G. Soyez and D. N. Triantafyllopoulos,Diffusive scaling and the high-energy limit of deep inelastic scattering in QCD at large N(c),Nucl. Phys. A773 (2006) 95 [arXiv:hep-ph/0601150]

work page arXiv 2006
[52]

Bzdak and K

A. Bzdak and K. Dusling,Probing proton fluctuations with asymmetric rapidity correlations, Phys. Rev. C93(2016) 031901 [arXiv:1511.03620 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2016
[53]

McLerran and P

L. McLerran and P. Tribedy,Intrinsic Fluctuations of the Proton Saturation Momentum Scale in High Multiplicity p+p Collisions,Nucl. Phys. A945(2016) 216 [arXiv:1508.03292 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2016
[54]

A. D. Le,Rapidity gap distribution in diffractive dissociation: Predictions for future electron-ion colliders,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 014014 [arXiv:2103.07724 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2021
[55]

A. D. Le, A. H. Mueller and S. Munier,Analytical asymptotics for hard diffraction,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 034026 [arXiv:2103.10088 [hep-ph]]. 36

work page arXiv 2021
[56]

Lappi, Eur

T. Lappi,Wilson line correlator in the MV model: Relating the glasma to deep inelastic scattering,Eur. Phys. J. C55(2008) 285 [arXiv:0711.3039 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2008
[57]

D. N. Triantafyllopoulos,Pomeron loops in high energy QCD,Acta Phys. Polon. B36(2005) 3593 [arXiv:hep-ph/0511226]

work page arXiv 2005
[58]

K. J. Golec-Biernat and M. Wusthoff,Saturation effects in deep inelastic scattering at low Q**2 and its implications on diffraction,Phys. Rev. D59(1998) 014017 [arXiv:hep-ph/9807513]

work page Pith review arXiv 1998
[59]

D. N. Triantafyllopoulos,The Energy dependence of the saturation momentum from RG improved BFKL evolution,Nucl. Phys. B648(2003) 293 [arXiv:hep-ph/0209121]

work page arXiv 2003
[60]

M¨ antysaari and B

H. M¨ antysaari and B. Schenke,Probing subnucleon scale fluctuations in ultraperipheral heavy ion collisions,Phys. Lett. B772(2017) 832 [arXiv:1703.09256 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2017
[61]

Lappi and A

T. Lappi and A. Ramnath,Unequal rapidity correlators in the dilute limit of the JIMWLK evolution,Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 054003 [arXiv:1904.00782 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2019
[62]

Iancu, A

E. Iancu, A. H. Mueller, D. N. Triantafyllopoulos and S. Y. Wei,Gluon dipole factorisation for diffractive dijets,JHEP10(2022) 103 [arXiv:2207.06268 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2022
[63]

Iancu, A

E. Iancu, A. H. Mueller, D. N. Triantafyllopoulos and S. Y. Wei,Probing gluon saturation via diffractive jets in ultra-peripheral nucleus-nucleus collisions,Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023) 1078 [arXiv:2304.12401 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2023
[64]

Hauksson, E

S. Hauksson, E. Iancu, A. H. Mueller, D. N. Triantafyllopoulos and S. Y. Wei,TMD factorisation for diffractive jets in photon-nucleus interactions,JHEP06(2024) 180 [arXiv:2402.14748 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2024
[65]

Dusling, F

K. Dusling, F. Gelis, T. Lappi and R. Venugopalan,Long range two-particle rapidity correlations in A+A collisions from high energy QCD evolution,Nucl. Phys. A836(2010) 159 [arXiv:0911.2720 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2010
[66]

Dusling and R

K. Dusling and R. Venugopalan,Comparison of the color glass condensate to dihadron correlations in proton-proton and proton-nucleus collisions,Phys. Rev. D87(2013) 094034 [arXiv:1302.7018 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2013
[67]

Iancu and D

E. Iancu and D. N. Triantafyllopoulos,JIMWLK evolution for multi-particle production in Langevin form,JHEP11(2013) 067 [arXiv:1307.1559 [hep-ph]]. 37

work page arXiv 2013