arxiv: 2604.26842 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-29 · ✦ hep-ph

Recognition: unknown

Null Tests and Lepton Universality in Xi_{cc} Baryon Decays

Hindi Zouhair

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 13:00 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph

keywords doubly charmed baryonslepton universalitynull testsnonleptonic decayssemileptonic decaysnew physicscharged currentsXi_cc

0 comments

The pith

Doubly charmed baryon decays isolate short-distance charged-current effects through null width combinations and lepton-universality ratios.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper constructs symmetry-protected observables in Ξ_cc decays to probe non-Standard-Model contributions to charged currents. In nonleptonic modes it defines a null combination of widths that vanishes exactly under heavy-diquark factorization, so any measured deviation directly signals nonfactorizable QCD dynamics. In semileptonic modes the ratio R_Ξ_c^{μe} is arranged so that leading hadronic normalizations cancel at the amplitude level, leaving percent-level sensitivity to short-distance vector couplings of size 10^{-2}. When baryon results are combined with mesonic data the same new-physics parameters are constrained with complementary scaling, which removes degeneracies that appear in meson-only analyses.

Core claim

A null combination of nonleptonic Ξ_cc widths vanishes in the heavy-diquark factorization limit while the semileptonic universality ratio R_Ξ_c^{μe} cancels leading hadronic matrix elements at the amplitude level, so that percent-level measurements constrain |C_{V_L}^μ| at O(10^{-2}) and map, together with meson inputs, onto multi-TeV new-physics scales.

What carries the argument

The null combination of nonleptonic decay widths together with the semileptonic lepton-universality ratio R_Ξ_c^{μe}, which exploit symmetry cancellations to separate nonfactorizable QCD effects from short-distance charged-current modifications.

If this is right

Deviations from the null width combination directly quantify nonfactorizable QCD dynamics.
Percent-level measurements of R_Ξ_c^{μe} give access to vector new-physics coefficients of order 10^{-2}.
Scalar new-physics contributions remain parametrically suppressed relative to vector ones.
Combining baryonic and mesonic observables lifts degeneracies present in meson-only constraints.
The framework reaches sensitivity to new-physics scales in the multi-TeV range.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same cancellation techniques could be applied to other doubly heavy baryons to test factorization assumptions across a broader set of states.
High-luminosity runs at LHCb or Belle II could turn these null tests into competitive bounds on charged-current operators that are independent of mesonic inputs.
The approach offers a cross-check that might help resolve whether apparent lepton-universality violations in mesons arise from the same short-distance source.

Load-bearing premise

The heavy-diquark factorization limit holds exactly so that the null width combination vanishes and any deviation can be attributed only to nonfactorizable QCD or new physics.

What would settle it

A high-precision measurement of the null nonleptonic width combination that is statistically inconsistent with zero would falsify the exact vanishing predicted by the factorization limit.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.26842 by Hindi Zouhair.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: FIG. 1. Response of the null observable view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. Differential decay rates for the semileptonic transi view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3. Dependence of the light-lepton universality ratio view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. Dependence of view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5. Comparison of the dependence of view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: FIG. 6. Projected sensitivity of the light-lepton universality view at source ↗

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: FIG. 8 view at source ↗

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: FIG. 9. Evolution of the allowed region for the Wilson view at source ↗

**Figure 10.** Figure 10: The light-lepton observable R(Xe/µ) and the projected baryonic measurement both favor values of CVL close to the Standard Model, while the R(D) benchmark prefers a positive shift of order CVL ∼ O(10−1 ). As a result, the combined fit is pulled toward the Standard Model region, leading to a nontrivial tension between the different classes of observables within this minimal universal scenario. The tension o… view at source ↗

**Figure 11.** Figure 11: FIG. 11. Ultraviolet mapping of the EFT constraint on view at source ↗

**Figure 12.** Figure 12: FIG. 12. Upper envelope of the allowed effective coupling view at source ↗

read the original abstract

We develop a precision framework for doubly charmed baryon decays based on symmetry-protected observables and effective-field-theory diagnostics. In nonleptonic $\Xi_{cc}$ decays, we construct a null combination of widths that vanishes in the heavy-diquark factorization limit, providing a direct probe of nonfactorizable QCD dynamics. For semileptonic decays, we identify the light-lepton universality ratio $R_{\Xi_c}^{\mu e}$ as an observable in which leading hadronic normalization cancels at the amplitude level, yielding direct sensitivity to short-distance charged-current interactions. Percent-level precision probes $|C_{V_L}^{\mu}|\sim \mathcal{O}(10^{-2})$, whereas $\mathcal{O}(10^{-1})$ deformations induce order-one deviations. Scalar contributions remain parametrically suppressed. Combining baryonic and mesonic inputs, we show that $\Xi_{cc}$ decays constrain the same short-distance interaction with complementary scaling, lifting degeneracies inherent to meson-only analyses. Mapping to a charged-vector benchmark demonstrates sensitivity to multi-TeVnew-physics scales. These results establish doubly charmed baryons as an independent probe of charged-current interactions beyond the Standard Model.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper proposes a null combination of nonleptonic Ξ_cc widths and a lepton universality ratio with amplitude-level cancellation, but the exact vanishing of the null test may not survive subleading 1/m_c corrections.

read the letter

The paper's core ideas are a null test built from nonleptonic Ξ_cc decay widths that is designed to vanish in the heavy-diquark factorization limit, plus the ratio R_Ξc^μe in semileptonic decays where leading hadronic factors cancel at the amplitude level. These give direct sensitivity to short-distance charged-current effects and can be combined with meson data to reduce degeneracies in fits. The constructions look new for this baryon system and the mapping to multi-TeV scales is laid out clearly enough in the abstract to show experimental reach at the percent level for vector-like operators while scalars stay suppressed. That is the useful part: concrete observables that exploit symmetry to isolate specific physics. The approach is straightforward and the complementarity argument holds on its own terms. The main soft spot is the null test itself. It is constructed to be exactly zero inside the factorization limit, so any measured deviation gets attributed to nonfactorizable QCD or new physics. If 1/m_c recoil or spin-orbit terms from the diquark treatment survive in the chosen combination, the cancellation is no longer clean and the interpretation weakens. The abstract does not show explicit checks or power-counting estimates for those corrections, so it is hard to judge how small they really are. The paper does not appear to contain data comparisons or numerical error budgets either. This work is aimed at flavor theorists and experimentalists who already think about baryon decays or global fits for lepton universality. A reader looking for fresh observables to propose at LHCb or future facilities would find the specific ratios and combinations worth examining. It deserves a serious referee because the observables are defined sharply enough that the derivations can be checked and the factorization assumption can be tested. I would send it to peer review.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper develops a precision framework for Ξ_cc baryon decays using symmetry-protected observables and EFT diagnostics. It constructs a null combination of nonleptonic decay widths that vanishes in the heavy-diquark factorization limit to isolate nonfactorizable QCD dynamics, and identifies the semileptonic lepton-universality ratio R_Ξc^{μe} in which leading hadronic normalizations cancel at the amplitude level, yielding sensitivity to short-distance charged-current new physics. The work claims that combining baryonic and mesonic inputs lifts degeneracies, constrains |C_VL^μ| at the percent level, and probes multi-TeV scales, establishing doubly charmed baryons as an independent BSM probe.

Significance. If the central assumptions hold, particularly the exact vanishing of the null combination and the amplitude-level cancellation in the universality ratio, the results would provide a valuable new handle on nonfactorizable effects and lepton universality in baryonic decays. The complementarity to mesonic analyses and the parametric suppression of scalar contributions are strengths that could meaningfully extend global fits to charged-current operators.

major comments (2)

[§4] §4 (nonleptonic null test): The claim that the constructed combination of widths vanishes exactly in the heavy-diquark factorization limit, allowing any deviation to be attributed solely to nonfactorizable QCD, requires explicit verification that all contributions—including subleading 1/m_c recoil and spin-orbit terms from the effective diquark Lagrangian—cancel identically at the working order. Without a power-counting estimate or explicit cancellation check, deviations cannot be cleanly isolated from higher-order corrections within the limit itself.
[§5] §5 (semileptonic ratio and EFT matching): The statement that R_Ξc^{μe} yields direct sensitivity to |C_VL^μ| ∼ O(10^{-2}) with O(10^{-1}) deformations inducing order-one effects relies on the hadronic cancellation and parametric suppression of scalars. The explicit operator basis, matching coefficients, and error budget for this cancellation should be provided to confirm the quoted reach and the absence of residual hadronic contamination at the claimed precision.

minor comments (2)

The abstract contains the typographical error 'multi-TeVnew-physics'; correct to 'multi-TeV new-physics'.
Notation for the universality ratio is introduced as R_Ξc^{μe} but later referenced inconsistently; adopt a single consistent symbol throughout.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We address each major point below and will revise the paper accordingly to strengthen the presentation and provide the requested details.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [§4] §4 (nonleptonic null test): The claim that the constructed combination of widths vanishes exactly in the heavy-diquark factorization limit, allowing any deviation to be attributed solely to nonfactorizable QCD, requires explicit verification that all contributions—including subleading 1/m_c recoil and spin-orbit terms from the effective diquark Lagrangian—cancel identically at the working order. Without a power-counting estimate or explicit cancellation check, deviations cannot be cleanly isolated from higher-order corrections within the limit itself.

Authors: We agree that an explicit verification is needed to substantiate the exact vanishing. In the revised version we will add a power-counting analysis to §4 that demonstrates the cancellation of leading and subleading 1/m_c recoil and spin-orbit contributions from the effective diquark Lagrangian in the null combination. Residual effects enter only at higher order in the expansion, allowing deviations to be attributed to nonfactorizable QCD as claimed. revision: yes
Referee: [§5] §5 (semileptonic ratio and EFT matching): The statement that R_Ξc^{μe} yields direct sensitivity to |C_VL^μ| ∼ O(10^{-2}) with O(10^{-1}) deformations inducing order-one effects relies on the hadronic cancellation and parametric suppression of scalars. The explicit operator basis, matching coefficients, and error budget for this cancellation should be provided to confirm the quoted reach and the absence of residual hadronic contamination at the claimed precision.

Authors: We will expand §5 to include the complete operator basis for charged-current new physics, the explicit matching coefficients to the low-energy EFT, and a quantitative error budget. This will show the amplitude-level cancellation of leading hadronic normalizations, the parametric suppression of scalar operators, and the residual uncertainties after cancellation, thereby confirming the quoted sensitivity to |C_VL^μ|. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper constructs a null combination of nonleptonic widths designed to vanish exactly in the heavy-diquark factorization limit and identifies a lepton-universality ratio in which leading hadronic factors cancel at the amplitude level. These are standard symmetry-protected constructions for isolating effects, not reductions of predictions to fitted inputs or self-referential definitions. No self-citations are invoked as load-bearing for uniqueness theorems or ansatze, and no parameters are fitted to a subset then relabeled as predictions. The central claims rest on EFT diagnostics and explicit cancellation properties that remain independent of the target observables.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the validity of the heavy-diquark factorization limit and effective-field-theory matching for short-distance operators; no explicit free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Heavy-diquark factorization limit applies to Ξ_cc nonleptonic decays
Invoked so that the null combination of widths vanishes exactly in that limit.
domain assumption Leading hadronic normalization cancels at amplitude level in the semileptonic ratio
Stated as the reason the ratio is sensitive only to short-distance interactions.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5497 in / 1306 out tokens · 65957 ms · 2026-05-07T13:00:57.266740+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 36 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

[1]

Weak decays of heavy mesons in the static quark approximation,

N. Isgur and M. B. Wise, “Weak decays of heavy mesons in the static quark approximation,” Phys. Lett. B232 (1989) 113

1989
[2]

Heavy Quark Symmetry

M. Neubert, “Heavy quark symmetry,” Phys. Rept.245 (1994) 259 [arXiv:hep-ph/9306320]

work page Pith review arXiv 1994
[3]

A. V. Manohar and M. B. Wise,Heavy Quark Physics, Cambridge Monographs on Particle Physics (2000)

2000
[4]

Observation of the doubly charmed baryonΞ++ cc ,

R. Aaijet al.[LHCb Collaboration], “Observation of the doubly charmed baryonΞ++ cc ,” Phys. Rev. Lett.119 (2017) 112001 [arXiv:1707.01621 [hep-ex]]

work page arXiv 2017
[5]

First observation of the doubly charmed baryon decayΞ ++ cc →Ξ+ cπ+,

R. Aaijet al.[LHCb Collaboration], “First observation of the doubly charmed baryon decayΞ ++ cc →Ξ+ cπ+,” Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 162002 (2018) [arXiv:1807.01919 [hep-ex]]

work page arXiv 2018
[6]

Spectrum of baryons with two heavy quarks,

M. J. Savage and M. B. Wise, “Spectrum of baryons with two heavy quarks,” Phys. Lett. B248(1990) 177

1990
[7]

Baryons with two heavy quarks,

V. V. Kiselev and A. K. Likhoded, “Baryons with two heavy quarks,” Phys. Usp.45(2002) 455 [arXiv:hep- ph/0103169]

work page arXiv 2002
[8]

Discovery of doubly charmedΞ cc baryon implies a stablebb¯u¯dtetraquark,

M. Karliner and J. L. Rosner, “Discovery of doubly charmedΞ cc baryon implies a stablebb¯u¯dtetraquark,” Phys. Rev. Lett.119(2017) 202001 [arXiv:1707.07666 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2017
[9]

Conclusions from the LHCb observation ofΞ ++ cc ,

I. I. Bigi, A. Paul and S. Recksiegel, “Conclusions from the LHCb observation ofΞ ++ cc ,” JHEP09(2017) 083 [arXiv:1708.01296 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2017
[10]

Charmed baryon physics circa 2018,

H. Y. Cheng, “Charmed baryon physics circa 2018,” Chin. J. Phys.56(2018) 1853 [arXiv:1805.12125 [hep- ph]]

work page arXiv 2018
[11]

To- wards a heavy diquark effective theory for weak decays of doubly heavy baryons,

Y.-J. Shi, W. Wang, Z.-X. Zhao and U.-G. Meißner, “To- wards a heavy diquark effective theory for weak decays of doubly heavy baryons,” Eur. Phys. J. C80, 398 (2020) [arXiv:1902.01092 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2020
[12]

Masses of doubly heavy baryons in the relativistic quark model,

D. Ebert, R. N. Faustov and V. O. Galkin, “Masses of doubly heavy baryons in the relativistic quark model,” Phys. Rev. D72(2005) 034026 [arXiv:hep-ph/0403211]

work page arXiv 2005
[13]

QCD Factorization for $B\to\pi\pi$ Decays: Strong Phases and CP Violation in the Heavy Quark Limit

M. Beneke, G. Buchalla, M. Neubert and C. T. Sachra- jda, “QCD factorization for B→ππdecays,” Phys. Rev. Lett.83(1999) 1914 [arXiv:hep-ph/9905312]

work page Pith review arXiv 1999
[14]

Weak Decays Beyond Leading Logarithms

G. Buchalla, A. J. Buras and M. E. Lautenbacher, “Weak decays beyond leading logarithms,” Rev. Mod. Phys.68 (1996) 1125 [arXiv:hep-ph/9512380]

work page Pith review arXiv 1996
[15]

Effective Lagrangian analysis of new interactions and flavor conservation,

W. Buchmüller and D. Wyler, “Effective Lagrangian analysis of new interactions and flavor conservation,” Nucl. Phys. B268(1986) 621

1986
[16]

Dimension-Six Terms in the Standard Model Lagrangian

B. Grzadkowski, M. Iskrzynski, M. Misiak and J. Rosiek, “Dimension-six terms in the Standard Model La- grangian,” JHEP10(2010) 085 [arXiv:1008.4884 [hep- ph]]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2010
[17]

Semileptonic decays of light quarks beyond the Standard Model,

V. Cirigliano, J. Jenkins and M. Gonzalez-Alonso, “Semileptonic decays of light quarks beyond the Standard Model,” Nucl. Phys. B830(2010) 95 [arXiv:0908.1754 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2010
[18]

Doubly heavy baryons, heavy quark-diquark symmetry and NRQCD,

S. Fleming and T. Mehen, “Doubly heavy baryons, heavy quark-diquark symmetry and NRQCD,” Phys. Rev. D73 (2006) 034502 [arXiv:hep-ph/0509313]

work page arXiv 2006
[19]

Model predictions for dou- bly charmed baryons,

J. Eakins and W. Roberts, “Model predictions for dou- bly charmed baryons,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A27(2012) 1250039 [arXiv:1201.4885 [nucl-th]]

work page arXiv 2012
[20]

Dou- bly charmed baryon decaysΞ ++ cc →Ξ(′)+ c π+ in the quark model,

S. Zeng, F. Xu, P. Y. Niu and H. Y. Cheng, “Dou- bly charmed baryon decaysΞ ++ cc →Ξ(′)+ c π+ in the quark model,” Phys. Rev. D107, 034009 (2023) [arXiv:2212.12983 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2023
[21]

Exclusive non-leptonic charm baryon decays,

J. G. Korner and M. Kramer, “Exclusive non-leptonic charm baryon decays,” Z. Phys. C55, 659 (1992)

1992
[22]

Exclusive non- leptonic decays of D,D s, and B mesons,

M. Bauer, B. Stech and M. Wirbel, “Exclusive non- leptonic decays of D,D s, and B mesons,” Z. Phys. C 34, 103 (1987)

1987
[23]

Non-Leptonic Weak Decays of B Mesons

M.NeubertandB.Stech, “Non-leptonicweakdecaysofB mesons,” Adv. Ser. Direct. High Energy Phys.15(1998) 294 [arXiv:hep-ph/9705292]

work page Pith review arXiv 1998
[24]

Review of particle physics,

S. Navaset al.[Particle Data Group], “Review of particle physics,” Phys. Rev. D110, 030001 (2024)

2024
[25]

Semileptonic decays of doubly charmed baryons withΞc–Ξ′ c mixing,

C. Q. Geng, X. N. Jin and C. W. Liu, “Semileptonic decays of doubly charmed baryons withΞc–Ξ′ c mixing,” Phys. Rev. D106, 073006 (2022) [arXiv:2212.02971 [hep- ph]]

work page arXiv 2022
[26]

R. N. Faustov and V. O. Galkin, Phys. Rev. D94(2016) 073008

2016
[27]

Λb→pℓ−¯νℓand Λb→Λcℓ−¯νℓform factors from lattice QCD with rela- tivistic heavy quarks,

W. Detmold, C. Lehner and S. Meinel, “Λb→pℓ−¯νℓand Λb→Λcℓ−¯νℓform factors from lattice QCD with rela- tivistic heavy quarks,” Phys. Rev. D92, 034503 (2015) [arXiv:1503.01421 [hep-lat]]

work page arXiv 2015
[28]

Λc →Λℓ+νℓform factors and decay rates from lattice QCD with physical quark masses,

S. Meinel, “Λc →Λℓ+νℓform factors and decay rates from lattice QCD with physical quark masses,” Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 082001 (2017) [arXiv:1611.09696 [hep- lat]]

work page arXiv 2017
[29]

González-Alonso, O

M. Gonzalez-Alonso, O. Naviliat-Cuncic and N. Sev- erijns, “New physics searches in nuclear and neutron beta decay,” Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.104, 165 (2019) [arXiv:1803.08732 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2019
[30]

WCxf: an exchange format for Wil- son coefficients beyond the Standard Model,

J. Aebischeret al., “WCxf: an exchange format for Wil- son coefficients beyond the Standard Model,” Comput. Phys. Commun.232, 71 (2018) [arXiv:1712.05298 [hep- ph]]

work page arXiv 2018
[31]

Ligeti, M

Z. Ligeti, M. Papucci and D. J. Robinson, “New physics in the visible final states ofB→D(∗)τν,” JHEP01, 083 (2017) [arXiv:1610.02045 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2017
[32]

Tau longitudinal po- larization inB→Dτνand its role in the search for charged Higgs boson,

M. Tanaka and R. Watanabe, “Tau longitudinal po- larization inB→Dτνand its role in the search for charged Higgs boson,” Phys. Rev. D82, 034027 (2010) [arXiv:1005.4306 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2010
[33]

Sakaki, M

Y. Sakaki, M. Tanaka, A. Tayduganov and R. Watan- abe, “Probing New Physics inB→D(∗)τνusing dif- ferential distributions,” Phys. Rev. D88, 094012 (2013) [arXiv:1309.0301 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2013
[34]

Fajfer, J

S. Fajfer, J. F. Kamenik and I. Nišandžić, “On the B→D∗τ¯ντsensitivity to new physics,” Phys. Rev. D 85, 094025 (2012) [arXiv:1203.2654 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2012
[35]

Combined analysis of semileptonicBdecays toDandD ∗:R(D (∗)),|V cb|, and new physics,

F.U.Bernlochner, Z.Ligeti, M.PapucciandD.J.Robin- son, “Combined analysis of semileptonicBdecays toD andD∗:R(D (∗)),|Vcb|, and new physics,” Phys. Rev. D 95, 115008 (2017) [arXiv:1703.05330 [hep-ph]]. 16

work page arXiv 2017
[36]

Test of Light- Lepton Universality in the Rates of Inclusive Semilep- tonicB-Meson Decays at Belle II,

Belle II Collaboration, L. Aggarwalet al., “Test of Light- Lepton Universality in the Rates of Inclusive Semilep- tonicB-Meson Decays at Belle II,” Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 051804 (2023) [arXiv:2301.08266 [hep-ex]]

work page arXiv 2023
[37]

Averages ofb-hadron, c-hadron, andτ-lepton properties (2023 update),

Heavy Flavor Averaging Group, “Averages ofb-hadron, c-hadron, andτ-lepton properties (2023 update),” [arXiv:2309.07249 [hep-ex]]

work page arXiv 2023
[38]

New physics inb→cℓνtransitions af- ter the 2022 updates,

M. Alguero, S. Descotes-Genon, T. Hurth, J. Matias and J. Virto, “New physics inb→cℓνtransitions af- ter the 2022 updates,” Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 096016 [arXiv:2208.08921 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2022
[39]

Global fit tob→cτνtransitions,

C. Murgui, A. Peñuelas, M. Jung and A. Pich, “Global fit tob→cτνtransitions,” JHEP09, 103 (2019) [arXiv:1904.09311 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2019
[40]

The Physics of Heavy Z' Gauge Bosons

P. Langacker, “The physics of heavyZ′gauge bosons,” Rev. Mod. Phys.81, 1199 (2009) [arXiv:0801.1345 [hep- ph]]

work page Pith review arXiv 2009
[41]

Physics of leptoquarks in precision exper- iments and at particle colliders,

I. Doršner, S. Fajfer, A. Greljo, J. F. Kamenik and N. Košnik, “Physics of leptoquarks in precision exper- iments and at particle colliders,” Phys. Rept.641, 1 (2016) [arXiv:1603.04993 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2016
[42]

Flavor mod- els for ¯B→D(∗)τ¯ν,

M. Freytsis, Z. Ligeti and J. T. Ruderman, “Flavor mod- els for ¯B→D(∗)τ¯ν,” Phys. Rev. D92, 054018 (2015) [arXiv:1506.08896 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2015
[43]

Aadet al.(ATLAS), Phys

ATLAS Collaboration, G. Aadet al., “Search for new high-mass resonances in theℓνfinal state usingppcolli- sions at√s= 13 TeVwith the ATLAS detector,” Phys. Lett. B796, 68 (2019) [arXiv:1906.05609 [hep-ex]]

work page arXiv 2019
[44]

Search for high-mass resonances in final states with a lepton and missing transverse momentum at√s= 13 TeV,

A. Tumasyanet al.[CMS Collaboration], “Search for high-mass resonances in final states with a lepton and missing transverse momentum at√s= 13 TeV,” JHEP 07, 067 (2022) [arXiv:2202.06075 [hep-ex]]

work page arXiv 2022