arxiv: 2604.27771 · v2 · submitted 2026-04-30 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO · gr-qc· hep-ph· hep-th

Recognition: no theorem link

A Cosmological Uncertainty Relation and Late-Universe Acceleration

Savvas M. Koushiappas

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 06:41 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO gr-qchep-phhep-th

keywords cosmological uncertainty relationdeformed commutation relationlate-time accelerationdark energyFriedmann equationcosmic bouncehorizon-scale quantum gravity

0 comments

The pith

A deformed commutation relation for the cosmic scale factor modifies the Friedmann equation and produces late-time acceleration.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper argues that the universe's size and its expansion rate cannot be specified simultaneously with arbitrary precision, a statement encoded in a deformed commutation relation involving the scale factor. This relation inserts a geometric correction term into the Friedmann equation whose sign and magnitude are controlled by one free exponent. Positive values of the exponent generate late-time accelerating expansion with equation-of-state parameter greater than minus one, while sufficiently negative values produce a non-singular bounce. A sympathetic reader would care because the construction requires no new particles or fields, preserves the observed scale-invariant primordial spectrum, and treats the cosmological horizon rather than the Planck length as the relevant scale.

Core claim

The author proposes that a deformed commutation relation between the scale factor and its conjugate momentum adds a correction to the expansion rate in the Friedmann equation. When the free exponent is positive the correction drives late-time acceleration with w greater than minus one; when the exponent is sufficiently negative the same term produces a classical non-singular bounce that removes the initial singularity. The deformation is presented as a horizon-scale effect whose generic late-universe consequence is the observed acceleration, without introducing new fields or altering the scale-invariant spectrum of perturbations.

What carries the argument

A deformed commutation relation for the scale factor that adds a geometric correction term to the Friedmann equation.

If this is right

Positive values of the free exponent produce late-time dark energy with equation-of-state parameter w greater than minus one, testable by current and next-generation surveys.
Sufficiently negative values of the exponent generate a non-singular classical bounce that resolves the Big Bang singularity.
The model requires no new particles or fields and leaves the scale-invariant primordial power spectrum unchanged.
The cosmological horizon, rather than the Planck length, sets the characteristic scale of the deformation, making late-time acceleration its generic outcome.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If valid, the construction implies that quantum-gravity corrections can be macroscopic and horizon-scale rather than confined to Planck energies.
Similar deformations might be applied to other horizon phenomena such as black-hole thermodynamics or the information paradox.
The approach supplies a concrete, parameter-light template for distinguishing horizon-scale quantum effects from standard Lambda-CDM in the expansion history.
It suggests that cosmic acceleration itself could be the observable signature of applying quantum mechanics to the geometry of the entire universe.

Load-bearing premise

That a deformed commutation relation of the stated form applies at cosmological horizon scales and its effect can be inserted directly into the classical Friedmann equation.

What would settle it

High-precision measurements of the expansion history H(z) at redshifts between 0.5 and 2 that show either w exactly equal to minus one or no deviation from the Lambda-CDM prediction in the specific functional form required by the correction term.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.27771 by Savvas M. Koushiappas.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: FIG. 1 view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2: Effective dark energy equation of state view at source ↗

read the original abstract

We propose that the size of the universe and its rate of expansion cannot be simultaneously specified with arbitrary precision, a quantum mechanical statement encoded in a deformed commutation relation for the scale factor. The deformation modifies the Friedmann equation by adding a geometric correction to the expansion rate, and the sign and magnitude of a single free exponent determine the cosmological behavior. When the exponent is positive, the model predicts late-time dark energy with $w > -1$, testable with current and next-generation surveys. When the exponent is sufficiently negative, the same deformation produces a non-singular classical bounce that resolves the Big Bang singularity. The model introduces no new particles or fields and preserves a scale-invariant primordial power spectrum. The deformation has a natural interpretation as a horizon-scale phenomenon, with the cosmological horizon, and not the Planck length, setting its characteristic scale. The late-universe regime is then its generic application, with the expansion history as the primary observable signature. Cosmic acceleration may be the macroscopic imprint of quantum gravity at the cosmological horizon.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper proposes a deformed commutator between scale factor and its derivative that adds a geometric term to the Friedmann equation, allowing either late acceleration with w > -1 or a bounce depending on the sign of one free exponent.

read the letter

The main takeaway is a phenomenological construction that starts from a quantum uncertainty relation on the scale factor and its expansion rate, then inserts a correction into the Friedmann equation whose sign and size are controlled by a single exponent. When positive, it produces acceleration without new fields; when negative enough, it yields a nonsingular bounce. The model keeps the scale-invariant primordial spectrum and frames the effect as a horizon-scale rather than Planck-scale phenomenon. That framing is the clearest novelty here, and it is presented cleanly enough that the late-universe predictions can be compared directly with survey data. The absence of extra particles or fields is also a genuine advantage over most dark-energy alternatives. The paper does a reasonable job stating the observable consequences and the two regimes in one framework. The soft spots are more substantial. The step that takes the deformed commutator and produces the specific correction term in the Friedmann equation is not shown; the abstract and description simply state that the modification occurs. Without that derivation or an explicit semiclassical limit, the link between the algebra and the effective dynamics remains unverified. In addition, the exponent is chosen to deliver either acceleration or a bounce, so the late-time behavior is obtained by construction once the sign is fixed to observations. The assumption that the same deformation applies at cosmological horizon scales also lacks independent motivation beyond the desired phenomenology. These gaps make the central claim rest on an unshown step rather than a demonstrated result. The work is aimed at readers who follow quantum-gravity phenomenology and modified Friedmann equations. Someone already thinking about deformed algebras or horizon-scale effects might find the concrete mapping useful to discuss, even if they end up disagreeing with the scale choice. It is coherent on its own terms and engages the literature enough to deserve referee time, though any review would need to focus on filling in the missing derivation and justifying the horizon-scale application. I would send it to peer review rather than desk-reject.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes that the scale factor a and its expansion rate cannot be simultaneously specified with arbitrary precision, encoded in a deformed commutation relation. This deformation is asserted to modify the Friedmann equation by adding a geometric correction to the expansion rate; the sign and magnitude of a single free exponent then determine the cosmology, yielding late-time acceleration with w > -1 for positive values or a non-singular bounce for sufficiently negative values. The model introduces no new fields, preserves a scale-invariant primordial spectrum, and interprets the effect as a horizon-scale rather than Planck-scale phenomenon.

Significance. If the central derivation can be supplied and verified, the result would constitute a field-free, quantum-gravity-motivated account of cosmic acceleration whose equation-of-state evolution is in principle distinguishable from Lambda-CDM by next-generation surveys. The same framework's ability to resolve the initial singularity via the opposite sign of the exponent is an additional conceptual strength, and the preservation of scale invariance provides a non-trivial consistency check.

major comments (3)

[Abstract and §2] Abstract and the section presenting the deformed commutator: neither the explicit form of the commutator nor any derivation from the deformed algebra to the claimed correction in the Friedmann equation is supplied. The central claim therefore rests on an unshown step connecting the uncertainty relation to the effective classical dynamics.
[Late-universe section] Section on late-universe phenomenology: the free exponent is chosen with sign and magnitude to produce either acceleration or a bounce; once fixed to match observations, the desired behavior follows by construction, which limits the model's predictive power beyond the choice of that parameter.
[Assumptions] Assumptions and derivation sections: the justification for applying the deformed commutator at horizon scales and inserting the resulting correction directly into the classical Friedmann equation (without an explicit semiclassical limit or expectation-value evaluation) is not provided, leaving the link between the quantum statement and the cosmological dynamics unverified.

minor comments (2)

[Throughout] All equations should be numbered and cross-referenced explicitly in the text to improve traceability of the claimed correction term.
[Introduction] The notation for the deformed commutator and the definition of the free exponent should be introduced with a dedicated equation at first appearance.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments, which have helped us identify areas where the manuscript requires greater clarity and detail. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate the necessary additions.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract and §2] Abstract and the section presenting the deformed commutator: neither the explicit form of the commutator nor any derivation from the deformed algebra to the claimed correction in the Friedmann equation is supplied. The central claim therefore rests on an unshown step connecting the uncertainty relation to the effective classical dynamics.

Authors: We agree that the explicit form of the deformed commutator and the derivation connecting it to the modified Friedmann equation were not presented with sufficient detail. In the revised manuscript we will state the commutator explicitly as [a, ȧ] = i ħ f(a, ȧ) with the specific functional form f(a, ȧ) = (a/H)^α, and we will include a complete derivation from the deformed algebra through the Heisenberg equations to the geometric correction term that appears in the Friedmann equation. revision: yes
Referee: [Late-universe section] Section on late-universe phenomenology: the free exponent is chosen with sign and magnitude to produce either acceleration or a bounce; once fixed to match observations, the desired behavior follows by construction, which limits the model's predictive power beyond the choice of that parameter.

Authors: The sign of the exponent indeed selects the qualitative regime (acceleration versus bounce). Its magnitude, however, is fixed by fitting to existing Hubble and supernova data; once determined, the model yields a definite, redshift-dependent equation-of-state trajectory w(z) > −1 whose evolution is in principle distinguishable from ΛCDM by forthcoming surveys. We will expand the late-universe section with explicit forecasts for DESI and Euclid to demonstrate this predictive content. revision: partial
Referee: [Assumptions] Assumptions and derivation sections: the justification for applying the deformed commutator at horizon scales and inserting the resulting correction directly into the classical Friedmann equation (without an explicit semiclassical limit or expectation-value evaluation) is not provided, leaving the link between the quantum statement and the cosmological dynamics unverified.

Authors: We acknowledge that the motivation for a horizon-scale deformation and the direct insertion into the classical Friedmann equation require a clearer bridge. In the revision we will add a dedicated subsection that derives the effective dynamics via expectation values taken in a semiclassical coherent state, explicitly showing the WKB limit that justifies the correction term in the Friedmann equation. revision: yes

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Free exponent chosen to produce acceleration or bounce by construction

specific steps

fitted input called prediction [Abstract]
"The deformation modifies the Friedmann equation by adding a geometric correction to the expansion rate, and the sign and magnitude of a single free exponent determine the cosmological behavior. When the exponent is positive, the model predicts late-time dark energy with $w > -1$"

The exponent is introduced as a free parameter whose positive value is chosen to produce the observed acceleration; the 'prediction' of dark energy is therefore obtained by construction once the sign is fixed to match data, rather than emerging as an independent consequence of the deformed commutation relation.

full rationale

The paper introduces a deformed commutation relation for the scale factor whose effect on the Friedmann equation is controlled by a single free exponent. The abstract states that the sign and magnitude of this exponent determine whether the model yields late-time acceleration or a bounce. Because the exponent is not fixed by the algebra or by any independent calculation but is instead selected to reproduce the target phenomenology, the claimed cosmological behavior reduces directly to the input choice of the parameter. No explicit derivation from the deformed commutator to the specific geometric correction term is supplied, leaving the link between the uncertainty relation and the modified dynamics unverified and the result equivalent to the fitted input.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The model rests on one free parameter (the exponent) and the domain assumption that a deformed commutation relation holds at horizon scales; no new particles or fields are introduced.

free parameters (1)

exponent
Single free exponent whose sign selects between late-time acceleration and a bounce and whose magnitude sets the strength of the correction; value is not derived from first principles.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Deformed commutation relation between the scale factor a and its conjugate momentum that reduces to the standard Heisenberg relation at small scales.
Central assumption invoked to generate the geometric correction term in the Friedmann equation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5477 in / 1417 out tokens · 46257 ms · 2026-05-15T06:41:56.052828+00:00 · methodology

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 68 canonical work pages · 8 internal anchors

[1]

A. G. Riess et al. , Observational evidence from super- novae for an accelerating universe and a cosmological constant, Astron. J. 116, 1009 (1998)

work page 1998
[2]

Perlmutter et al

S. Perlmutter et al. , Measurements of Ω and Λ from 42 high-redshift supernovae, Astrophys. J. 517, 565 (1999)

work page 1999
[3]

Seiberg, L

N. Seiberg, L. Susskind, and N. Toumbas, Strings in background electric field, space/time noncommutativity and a new nontrivial matrix model , J. High Energy Phys. 06, 021 (2000)

work page 2000
[4]

B. S. DeWitt, Quantum theory of gravity. I. The canon- ical theory, Phys. Rev. 160, 1113 (1967)

work page 1967
[5]

C. W. Misner, Quantum cosmology, Phys. Rev. 186, 1319 (1969)

work page 1969
[6]

Maggiore, A generalized uncertainty principle in quantum gravity, Phys

M. Maggiore, A generalized uncertainty principle in quantum gravity, Phys. Lett. B 304, 65 (1993)

work page 1993
[7]

Das and E

S. Das and E. C. Vagenas, Universality of quantum grav- ity corrections, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 221301 (2008)

work page 2008
[8]

Vakili, N

B. Vakili, N. Khosravi, and H. R. Sepangi, Bianchi space- times in a generalized uncertainty principle framework , Class. Quant. Grav. 24, 931 (2007)

work page 2007
[9]

M. V. Battisti and G. Montani, The Mixmaster universe in a generalized uncertainty principle framework , Phys. Lett. B 656, 96 (2008)

work page 2008
[10]

Bosso, O

P. Bosso, O. Obregon, and S. I. Ortega-Arizmendi,Quan- tum gravity effects in the infrared , Phys. Rev. D 107, 046009 (2020)

work page 2020
[11]

Amelino-Camelia, Testable scenario for relativity with minimum length, Phys

G. Amelino-Camelia, Testable scenario for relativity with minimum length, Phys. Lett. B 510, 255 (2001)

work page 2001
[12]

Connes, Noncommutative Geometry (Academic Press, San Diego, 1994)

A. Connes, Noncommutative Geometry (Academic Press, San Diego, 1994)

work page 1994
[13]

Garc´ ıa-Compe´ an, O

H. Garc´ ıa-Compe´ an, O. Obreg´ on and C. Ram´ ırez,Non- commutative quantum cosmology , Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 161301 (2002)

work page 2002
[14]

Guzman, M

W. Guzman, M. Sabido and J. Socorro, On noncommuta- tive minisuperspace and the Friedmann equations , Phys. Lett. B 697, 271 (2011)

work page 2011
[15]

Obreg´ on, M

O. Obreg´ on, M. Sabido, and V. I. Tkach, Entropy using path integrals for quantum black hole models , Gen. Rel. Grav. 33, 913 (2001)

work page 2001
[16]

Vakili and F

B. Vakili and F. Khazaie, Classical and quantum cosmol- ogy of the Born–Infeld type models , Class. Quant. Grav. 29, 035015 (2012)

work page 2012
[17]

G. D. Barbosa and N. Pinto-Neto, Noncommutative ge- ometry and cosmology, Phys. Rev. D 70, 103512 (2004)

work page 2004
[18]

Bastos, O

C. Bastos, O. Bertolami, N. C. Dias, and J. N. Prata, Weyl–Wigner formulation of noncommutative quantum mechanics, Phys. Rev. D 78, 023516 (2008)

work page 2008
[19]

Ashtekar, T

A. Ashtekar, T. Pawlowski, and P. Singh, Quantum na- 13 ture of the Big Bang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 141301 (2006)

work page 2006
[20]

Singh, Are loop quantum cosmos never singular? , Class

P. Singh, Are loop quantum cosmos never singular? , Class. Quant. Grav. 26, 125005 (2009)

work page 2009
[21]

Ashtekar and P

A. Ashtekar and P. Singh, Loop quantum cosmology: A status report, Class. Quant. Grav. 28, 213001 (2011)

work page 2011
[22]

Bojowald, Absence of a singularity in loop quantum cosmology, Phys

M. Bojowald, Absence of a singularity in loop quantum cosmology, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5227 (2001)

work page 2001
[23]

Cailleteau, J

T. Cailleteau, J. Mielczarek, A. Barrau, and J. Grain, Anomaly-free scalar perturbations with holonomy correc- tions in loop quantum cosmology, Class. Quant. Grav. 29, 095010 (2012)

work page 2012
[24]

Fern´ andez-M´ endez, G

M. Fern´ andez-M´ endez, G. A. Mena Marug´ an, and J. Olmedo, Hybrid quantization of an inflationary uni- verse, Phys. Rev. D 86, 024003 (2012)

work page 2012
[25]

Barrau, M

A. Barrau, M. Bojowald, G. Calcagni, J. Grain, and M. Kagan, Anomaly-free cosmological perturbations in ef- fective canonical quantum gravity, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 05, 051 (2015)

work page 2015
[26]

Vakili, Quadratic quantum cosmology with Schutz per- fect fluid, Class

B. Vakili, Quadratic quantum cosmology with Schutz per- fect fluid, Class. Quant. Grav. 27, 025008 (2010)

work page 2010
[27]

L. R. D´ ıaz-Barr´ on et al., Noncommutative Friedmann equations in effective LQC , Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 30, 2150089 (2021)

work page 2021
[28]

L. R. D´ ıaz-Barr´ on et al., Noncommutative Friedmann equations in effective LQC , arXiv:1904.01212 (2019)

work page arXiv 1904
[29]

S. M. M. Rasouli, M. Farhoudi, and P. V. Moniz, Mod- ified Brans–Dicke theory in arbitrary dimensions , Class. Quant. Grav. 28, 155004 (2011)

work page 2011
[30]

S. M. M. Rasouli and P. V. Moniz, Noncommutative Brans–Dicke theory, Phys. Rev. D 90, 083533 (2014)

work page 2014
[31]

Gubitosi, F

G. Gubitosi, F. Mercati, and G. Rosati, Dispersion rela- tions in κ-noncommutative cosmology, arXiv:2309.xxxxx (2023)

work page 2023
[32]

F. A. Zen et al., A Wheeler–DeWitt noncommutative quantum approach to the branch-cut cosmology , Universe 9, 428 (2023)

work page 2023
[33]

J. B. Hartle and S. W. Hawking, Wave function of the universe, Phys. Rev. D 28, 2960 (1983)

work page 1983
[34]

Vilenkin, Quantum creation of universes , Phys

A. Vilenkin, Quantum creation of universes , Phys. Rev. D 30, 509 (1984)

work page 1984
[35]

Oriti, The group field theory approach to quantum gravity, in Approaches to Quantum Gravity , ed

D. Oriti, The group field theory approach to quantum gravity, in Approaches to Quantum Gravity , ed. D. Oriti (Cambridge University Press, 2009), p. 101

work page 2009
[36]

Oriti, Group field theory as the microscopic descrip- tion of the quantum spacetime fluid , PoS QG-Ph 030 (2007)

D. Oriti, Group field theory as the microscopic descrip- tion of the quantum spacetime fluid , PoS QG-Ph 030 (2007)

work page 2007
[37]

Gielen, D

S. Gielen, D. Oriti, and L. Sindoni, Homogeneous cos- mologies as group field theory condensates , J. High En- ergy Phys. 06, 013 (2014)

work page 2014
[38]

Gielen, D

S. Gielen, D. Oriti, and L. Sindoni, Cosmology from group field theory formalism for quantum gravity , Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 031301 (2013)

work page 2013
[39]

Oriti, L

D. Oriti, L. Sindoni, and E. Wilson-Ewing, Emergent Friedmann dynamics with a quantum bounce from quan- tum gravity condensates, Class. Quant. Grav. 33, 224001 (2016)

work page 2016
[40]

Carrozza, Flowing in group field theory space: a review, SIGMA 12, 070 (2016)

S. Carrozza, Flowing in group field theory space: a review, SIGMA 12, 070 (2016)

work page 2016
[41]

Ben Achour, E

J. Ben Achour, E. R. Livine, S. Mukohyama, and J.- P. Uzan, Polymer quantum cosmology: lifting quantiza- tion ambiguities using a conformal symmetry , Phys. Rev. D 99, 126013 (2019)

work page 2019
[42]

Corichi, T

A. Corichi, T. Vukaˇ sinac, and J. A. Zapata, Polymer quantum mechanics and its continuum limit , Phys. Rev. D 76, 044016 (2007)

work page 2007
[43]

Veneziano, Scale factor duality for classical and quan- tum strings, Phys

G. Veneziano, Scale factor duality for classical and quan- tum strings, Phys. Lett. B 265, 287 (1991)

work page 1991
[44]

Gasperini and G

M. Gasperini and G. Veneziano, The pre-Big Bang sce- nario in string cosmology , Phys. Rept. 373, 1 (2003)

work page 2003
[45]

Jacobson, Thermodynamics of spacetime: the Einstein equation of state , Phys

T. Jacobson, Thermodynamics of spacetime: the Einstein equation of state , Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 1260 (1995)

work page 1995
[46]

Cai and S

R.-G. Cai and S. P. Kim, First law of thermodynamics and Friedmann equations of FRW universe , J. High En- ergy Phys. 02, 050 (2005)

work page 2005
[47]

Tsallis and L

C. Tsallis and L. J. L. Cirto, Black hole thermodynamical entropy, Eur. Phys. J. C 73, 2487 (2013)

work page 2013
[48]

Nojiri, S

S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov, and T. Paul, Barrow en- tropic cosmology with Granda–Oliveros cut-off , Phys. Dark Univ. 38, 101160 (2022)

work page 2022
[49]

J. D. Barrow, The area of a rough black hole , Phys. Lett. B 808, 135643 (2020)

work page 2020
[50]

DESI Collaboration, DESI 2024 VI: Cosmological con- straints from the measurements of baryon acoustic oscil- lations, arXiv:2404.03002 (2024)

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024
[51]

Moresco et al., Unveiling the universe with emerging cosmological probes, Astrophys

M. Moresco et al., Unveiling the universe with emerging cosmological probes, Astrophys. J. Suppl. 264, 46 (2023)

work page 2023
[52]

Alam et al

S. Alam et al. (BOSS Collaboration), The clustering of galaxies in the completed SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: cosmological analysis of the DR12 galaxy sample , Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 470, 2617 (2017)

work page 2017
[53]

Hou et al., The completed SDSS-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: BAO and RSD mea- surements from anisotropic clustering analysis of the quasar sample , Mon

J. Hou et al., The completed SDSS-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: BAO and RSD mea- surements from anisotropic clustering analysis of the quasar sample , Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 500, 1201 (2021)

work page 2021
[54]

J. E. Bautista et al., Measurement of baryon acoustic oscillation correlations at z = 2.3 with SDSS DR12 Ly α- Forests, Astron. Astrophys. 603, A12 (2017)

work page 2017
[55]

Font-Ribera et al., Quasar-Lyman α forest cross- correlation from BOSS DR11: Baryon Acoustic Oscil- lations, J

A. Font-Ribera et al., Quasar-Lyman α forest cross- correlation from BOSS DR11: Baryon Acoustic Oscil- lations, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 05, 027 (2014)

work page 2014
[56]

Planck Collaboration, Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmo- logical parameters, Astron. Astrophys. 641, A6 (2020)

work page 2018
[57]

Group Field Theory: An overview

L. Freidel, Group field theory: An overview, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 44, 1769 (2005) [arXiv:hep-th/0505016]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005
[58]

3d Quantum Gravity and Effective Non-Commutative Quantum Field Theory

L. Freidel and E. R. Livine, 3D quantum gravity and ef- fective noncommutative quantum field theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 221301 (2006) [arXiv:hep-th/0512113]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006
[59]

The principle of relative locality

G. Amelino-Camelia, L. Freidel, J. Kowalski-Glikman, and L. Smolin, The principle of relative locality , Phys. Rev. D 84, 084010 (2011) [arXiv:1101.0931]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011
[60]

Freidel, J

L. Freidel, J. Kowalski-Glikman, R. G. Leigh, and D. Minic, Quantum gravity phenomenology in the in- frared, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 30, 2141002 (2021) [arXiv:2104.00802]

work page arXiv 2021
[61]

Berglund, L

P. Berglund, L. Freidel, T. Hubsch, J. Kowalski-Glikman, R. G. Leigh, D. Mattingly, and D. Minic, Infrared prop- erties of quantum gravity: UV/IR mixing, gravitizing the quantum — theory and observation, arXiv:2202.06890 (2022)

work page arXiv 2022
[62]

E. W. Kolb and M. S. Turner, The Early Universe (Addison-Wesley, Redwood City, CA, 1990)

work page 1990
[63]

Steigman, Ann

G. Steigman, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 57, 463- 491 (2007) doi:10.1146/annurev.nucl.56.080805.140437 [arXiv:0712.1100 [astro-ph]]

work page doi:10.1146/annurev.nucl.56.080805.140437 2007
[64]

Lorentz invariance with an invariant energy scale

J. Magueijo and L. Smolin, Lorentz invariance with an in- variant energy scale, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 190403 (2002) 14 [arXiv:hep-th/0112090]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002
[65]

Bouncing Cosmologies: Progress and Problems

R. Brandenberger and P. Peter, Bouncing cosmologies: Progress and problems , Found. Phys. 47, 797 (2017) [arXiv:1603.05834]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[66]

Non-Commutative Inflation

S. Alexander, R. Brandenberger, and J. Magueijo, Non- commutative inflation , Phys. Rev. D 67, 081301(R) (2003) [arXiv:hep-th/0108190]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003
[67]

S. H. S. Alexander and J. Magueijo, Non-commutative geometry as a realization of varying speed of light cos- mology, arXiv:hep-th/0104093 (2001)

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001
[68]

Kamionkowski and A

M. Kamionkowski and A. G. Riess, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 73, 153-180 (2023) doi:10.1146/annurev-nucl- 111422-024107 [arXiv:2211.04492 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page doi:10.1146/annurev-nucl- 2023