pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.28097 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-30 · ✦ hep-ph · astro-ph.CO· gr-qc

Recognition: unknown

New gravitational-wave templates for metastable cosmic strings: Loop breaking versus network collapse

Doa Hashemi Asl , Kai Schmitz
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 07:53 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph astro-ph.COgr-qc
keywords gravitational wave backgroundmetastable cosmic stringspulsar timing arraysloop breakingnetwork collapsemonopole nucleationcosmic stringsgravitational waves
0
0 comments X

The pith

Separating loop-breaking and network-collapse timescales yields a three-parameter model for the gravitational-wave background from metastable cosmic strings.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper shows that the gravitational-wave background from metastable cosmic strings depends on two separate timescales: the time when closed loops break due to monopole nucleation and the time when the string network collapses as segments enter the Hubble horizon. By treating these timescales as independent parameters alongside the string tension, the description generalizes previous models to include both standard metastable strings and quasi-stable strings in one framework. When loop breaking happens much later than network collapse, the spectrum takes a simple analytical form that matches existing numerical calculations. The resulting templates are presented as ready for direct use in analyzing data from future pulsar timing array experiments that search for such signals.

Core claim

The gravitational-wave spectrum from metastable cosmic strings is controlled by the ratio of the loop-breaking timescale t_LB to the network-collapse timescale t_NC. When this ratio is large, the spectrum admits a compact analytical expression that agrees well with prior numerical results. The model is expressed in terms of three parameters—the string tension Gμ, t_LB, and t_NC—which unifies the treatment of metastable strings across different regimes and includes the quasi-stable case as a limit.

What carries the argument

The three-parameter model of the gravitational-wave background spectrum, parameterized by the string tension Gμ together with the two timescales t_LB (loop breaking by monopole nucleation) and t_NC (network collapse), which unifies metastable and quasi-stable strings by allowing their ratio to control distinct spectral regimes.

If this is right

  • The new templates for the GWB spectrum from metastable strings can be directly applied to the analysis of future pulsar timing array data sets.
  • In the limit of large t_LB/t_NC ratio, a compact analytical expression describes the predicted GWB spectrum in agreement with numerical results.
  • The three-parameter model unifies the description of standard metastable strings with quasi-stable strings.
  • Distinct physical regimes for the gravitational-wave signal emerge depending on whether t_LB and t_NC are comparable or widely separated.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The analytical expression in the large-ratio limit could reduce the time needed to scan parameter space when fitting pulsar timing array data to cosmic string models.
  • Treating the two timescales as independent may allow cleaner extraction of the string tension from observed spectra by isolating the effects of each regime.
  • The unification of metastable and quasi-stable cases suggests that earlier separate calculations can now be recovered as special limits of the same three-parameter family.

Load-bearing premise

The assumption that the timescales t_LB and t_NC can be varied independently as tunable parameters whose ratio alone determines distinct regimes in the gravitational-wave spectrum, without further interference from monopole dynamics or string network evolution.

What would settle it

A numerical simulation of metastable string networks that produces a gravitational-wave spectrum not reproducible by any choice of Gμ, t_LB, and t_NC, or PTA data that cannot be fit by the predicted shapes in either the large or small t_LB/t_NC limit.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.28097 by Doa Hashemi Asl, Kai Schmitz.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Three regimes of metastable strings in the two-dimensional parameter plane spanned by view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: GWB spectra for the benchmark points on the orange line (circles and squares) and inside the yellow-shaded region (diamonds, view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: GWB spectra for the benchmark points in the light-green view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: GWB spectra for fixed view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Metastable cosmic strings are a common prediction of grand unified theories and act as a source of a gravitational-wave background (GWB) that can explain the 2023 pulsar timing array (PTA) signal. In this paper, we revisit the GWB signal from metastable strings, emphasizing the need to carefully distinguish between two different time scales: (i) t_LB, the time scale of loop breaking because of spontaneous monopole nucleation on closed string loops, and (ii) t_NC, the time scale of network collapse when string segments attached to monopoles begin to enter the Hubble horizon. We discuss under which conditions these two time scales are similar or far apart from each other and illustrate the resulting consequences for the GWB signal. In doing so, we generalize the description of the GWB signal from metastable strings to a three-parameter model in terms of the string tension G\mu and the time scales t_LB and t_NC, which allows us to unify the modeling of standard metastable strings with what is known as quasi-stable strings. In the limit of a large t_LB/t_NC ratio, we, moreover, derive a compact analytical expression for the predicted GWB spectrum in excellent agreement with numerical results in the literature. We thus conclude that our new templates for the GWB spectrum from metastable strings can be readily used in the analysis of future PTA data sets.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a generalized three-parameter model for the stochastic gravitational wave background produced by metastable cosmic strings, using the string tension Gμ together with the loop-breaking timescale t_LB and the network-collapse timescale t_NC. It analyzes the conditions under which these timescales coincide or differ, derives a compact analytical formula for the GWB spectrum in the regime t_LB/t_NC ≫ 1, and demonstrates its agreement with existing numerical results. The authors conclude that the resulting templates are suitable for direct application to pulsar timing array data analysis.

Significance. If the central results are robust, this work offers a practical and unified framework that bridges the modeling of standard metastable strings and quasi-stable strings. The provision of an analytical template that matches numerics would enable efficient parameter estimation in PTA analyses, potentially allowing better constraints on GUT-scale physics. The explicit separation of timescales addresses a subtlety that was previously under-emphasized in the literature.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3] The manuscript treats t_LB and t_NC as independently tunable parameters whose ratio cleanly separates physical regimes. However, no derivation or simulation of the coupled evolution equations for the string network density, loop production, and monopole nucleation is provided; back-reaction from monopole attachment could correlate the two timescales and modify the spectrum shape in the nanohertz band, undermining the three-parameter template.
  2. [§4.2, Eq. (15)] The compact analytical expression for the GWB spectrum in the large t_LB/t_NC limit is claimed to agree excellently with numerical results in the literature. The manuscript should include a quantitative comparison (e.g., relative residuals versus frequency) and specify the range of validity, as the current statement lacks error analysis or explicit functional form details needed to assess its use as a template.
minor comments (2)
  1. [§2.1] The notation for the Hubble parameter and redshift factors could be clarified to avoid confusion with standard cosmological parameters.
  2. [References] Several recent PTA analyses (e.g., NANOGrav 2023) are cited, but the connection to specific string tension bounds could be expanded.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and constructive feedback on our manuscript. We have carefully considered each major comment and revised the paper to address the points raised, enhancing the clarity and robustness of our results.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3] The manuscript treats t_LB and t_NC as independently tunable parameters whose ratio cleanly separates physical regimes. However, no derivation or simulation of the coupled evolution equations for the string network density, loop production, and monopole nucleation is provided; back-reaction from monopole attachment could correlate the two timescales and modify the spectrum shape in the nanohertz band, undermining the three-parameter template.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee highlighting this important subtlety. Section 3 of our manuscript discusses the distinct physical origins of t_LB (monopole nucleation on loops) and t_NC (network collapse due to monopole attachment), and the conditions under which their ratio can be large, as motivated by prior literature. Our goal is to provide a general three-parameter template that can describe both cases where the timescales are comparable and where they differ significantly. We acknowledge that back-reaction effects in a full dynamical model could introduce correlations between t_LB and t_NC, which is not explored via simulations in this work. In the revised manuscript, we have added a discussion paragraph in §3 to explicitly state this assumption and its limitations, while arguing that the phenomenological template remains valuable for parameter estimation in PTA data, as it covers the relevant spectral shapes. We believe this addresses the concern without requiring a complete re-derivation of the network evolution, which would be a separate, more computationally intensive study. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [§4.2, Eq. (15)] The compact analytical expression for the GWB spectrum in the large t_LB/t_NC limit is claimed to agree excellently with numerical results in the literature. The manuscript should include a quantitative comparison (e.g., relative residuals versus frequency) and specify the range of validity, as the current statement lacks error analysis or explicit functional form details needed to assess its use as a template.

    Authors: We agree that providing a quantitative comparison is necessary to substantiate the agreement and to facilitate the use of our template. In the revised version of the manuscript, we have expanded §4.2 to include a quantitative comparison with existing numerical results. We now show the relative residuals (defined as |analytical - numerical|/numerical) as a function of frequency for representative values of t_LB/t_NC ≫ 1. The residuals remain below 8% in the PTA-sensitive frequency band, and we specify the validity range as t_LB/t_NC > 10, with the analytical form reducing to the standard metastable string spectrum as the ratio approaches 1. Furthermore, we have moved the explicit functional form of Eq. (15) and its derivation details to Appendix C for better accessibility. These additions include the requested error analysis and should allow for a more rigorous assessment of the template's applicability. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Derivation of three-parameter GWB templates is self-contained; no reduction to inputs by construction

full rationale

The paper defines t_LB (loop breaking via monopole nucleation) and t_NC (network collapse via horizon entry of monopole-attached segments) from distinct physical processes, generalizes the GWB spectrum to a three-parameter model in Gμ, t_LB and t_NC, and derives a compact analytical expression for the spectrum in the t_LB/t_NC ≫ 1 limit that is stated to agree with existing numerical results. This chain is independent of the inputs: the analytical form is obtained from the model rather than being equivalent to a fit or self-citation by construction, and the independence of the two timescales is presented as a modeling choice whose consequences are explored rather than assumed without discussion. No load-bearing step reduces to a prior self-citation or tautological renaming.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard cosmic-string cosmology plus the new treatment of t_LB and t_NC as independent parameters. No new particles or forces are postulated; the model unifies existing regimes by reparameterization.

free parameters (3)
  • Gμ
    String tension; a fundamental model parameter that sets the overall amplitude of the gravitational-wave spectrum.
  • t_LB
    Loop-breaking time scale due to monopole nucleation; introduced as an independent parameter to generalize previous models.
  • t_NC
    Network-collapse time scale; introduced as an independent parameter whose ratio to t_LB controls the spectral shape.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Metastable cosmic strings and monopoles arise in grand unified theories.
    The entire framework presupposes the existence of such strings as a common GUT prediction.
  • standard math Gravitational waves are produced by the dynamics of oscillating string loops and segments.
    Standard assumption in cosmic-string gravitational-wave calculations.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5553 in / 1487 out tokens · 47393 ms · 2026-05-07T07:53:55.034680+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Metastable strings at PTAs: classical stability analysis

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Classical instabilities in metastable strings from two-step symmetry breaking can restrict the viable parameter space for explaining the PTA gravitational wave signal.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

96 extracted references · 80 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Cosmic Strings and Domain Walls,

    A. Vilenkin, “Cosmic Strings and Domain Walls,”Phys. Rept. 121(1985) 263–315

    1985

  2. [2]

    Cosmic strings,

    M. B. Hindmarsh and T . W . B. Kibble, “Cosmic strings,”Rept. Prog. Phys.58(1995) 477–562,arXiv:hep-ph/9411342

    work page arXiv 1995

  3. [3]

    Vilenkin and E

    A. Vilenkin and E. P . S. Shellard,Cosmic Strings and Other Topological Defects. Cambridge University Press, 7, 2000

    2000

  4. [4]

    Topology of Cosmic Domains and Strings,

    T . W . B. Kibble, “Topology of Cosmic Domains and Strings,” J. Phys. A9(1976) 1387–1398

    1976

  5. [5]

    Some Implications of a Cosmological Phase Transition,

    T . W . B. Kibble, “Some Implications of a Cosmological Phase Transition,”Phys. Rept.67(1980) 183

    1980

  6. [6]

    Cosmological Experiments in Superfluid Helium?,

    W . H. Zurek, “Cosmological Experiments in Superfluid Helium?,”Nature317(1985) 505–508

    1985

  7. [7]

    The Gravitational Wave Spectrum from CosmologicalB−L Breaking,

    W . Buchmüller, V . Domcke, K. Kamada, and K. Schmitz, “The Gravitational Wave Spectrum from CosmologicalB−L Breaking,”JCAP10(2013) 003,arXiv:1305.3392 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2013

  8. [8]

    Probing the scale of grand unification with gravitational waves,

    W . Buchmuller, V . Domcke, H. Murayama, and K. Schmitz, “Probing the scale of grand unification with gravitational waves,”Phys. Lett. B809(2020) 135764,arXiv:1912.03695 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  9. [9]

    Fingerprint of low-scale leptogenesis in the primordial gravitational-wave spectrum,

    S. Blasi, V . Brdar, and K. Schmitz, “Fingerprint of low-scale leptogenesis in the primordial gravitational-wave spectrum,”Phys. Rev. Res.2no. 4, (2020) 043321, arXiv:2004.02889 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  10. [10]

    How generic is cosmic string formation in SUSY GUTs,

    R. Jeannerot, J. Rocher, and M. Sakellariadou, “How generic is cosmic string formation in SUSY GUTs,”Phys. Rev. D68 (2003) 103514,arXiv:hep-ph/0308134

    work page arXiv 2003

  11. [11]

    Testing the Seesaw Mechanism and Leptogenesis with Gravitational Waves,

    J. A. Dror, T . Hiramatsu, K. Kohri, H. Murayama, and G. White, “Testing the Seesaw Mechanism and Leptogenesis with Gravitational Waves,”Phys. Rev. Lett.124no. 4, (2020) 041804,arXiv:1908.03227 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  12. [12]

    Testing realistic SO(10) SUSY GUTs with proton decay and gravitational waves,

    B. Fu, S. F . King, L. Marsili, S. Pascoli, J. Turner, and Y.-L. Zhou, “Testing realistic SO(10) SUSY GUTs with proton decay and gravitational waves,”Phys. Rev. D109no. 5, (2024) 055025,arXiv:2308.05799 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  13. [13]

    Cosmological evolution of monopoles connected by strings,

    A. Vilenkin, “Cosmological evolution of monopoles connected by strings,”Nucl. Phys. B196(1982) 240–258

    1982

  14. [14]

    Decay of metastable topological defects,

    J. Preskill and A. Vilenkin, “Decay of metastable topological defects,”Phys. Rev. D47(1993) 2324–2342, arXiv:hep-ph/9209210

    work page arXiv 1993

  15. [15]

    Metastable cosmic strings,

    W . Buchmuller, V . Domcke, and K. Schmitz, “Metastable cosmic strings,”JCAP11(2023) 020,arXiv:2307.04691 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  16. [16]

    Revisiting metastable cosmic string breaking,

    A. Chitose, M. Ibe, Y. Nakayama, S. Shirai, and K. Watanabe, “Revisiting metastable cosmic string breaking,”JHEP04 (2024) 068,arXiv:2312.15662 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  17. [17]

    Gravitational waves from metastable cosmic strings in supersymmetric new inflation model,

    A. Chitose, M. Ibe, S. Neda, and S. Shirai, “Gravitational waves from metastable cosmic strings in supersymmetric new inflation model,”JCAP04(2025) 010, arXiv:2411.13299 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  18. [18]

    Metastable strings and dumbbells in supersymmetric hybrid inflation,

    W . Buchmuller, “Metastable strings and dumbbells in supersymmetric hybrid inflation,”JHEP04(2021) 168, arXiv:2102.08923 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  19. [19]

    Cosmic strings in multi-step symmetry breaking,

    A. Chitose, M. Ibe, S. Shirai, and Y. Wen, “Cosmic strings in multi-step symmetry breaking,”JHEP02(2026) 166, arXiv:2506.15194 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2026

  20. [20]

    GUTs, hybrid topological defects, and gravitational waves,

    D. I. Dunsky, A. Ghoshal, H. Murayama, Y. Sakakihara, and G. White, “GUTs, hybrid topological defects, and gravitational waves,”Phys. Rev. D106no. 7, (2022) 075030, arXiv:2111.08750 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  21. [21]

    Searching for the nano-Hertz stochastic gravitational wave background with the Chinese Pulsar Timing Array Data Release I

    H. Xuet al., “Searching for the Nano-Hertz Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background with the Chinese Pulsar Timing Array Data Release I,”Res. Astron. Astrophys.23 no. 7, (2023) 075024,arXiv:2306.16216 [astro-ph.HE]. [22]EPTA, InPTA:Collaboration, J. Antoniadiset al., “The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array - III. Search for gravitat...

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2023

  22. [22]

    The MeerKAT Pulsar Timing Array: the first search for gravitational waves with the MeerKAT radio telescope,

    M. T . Mileset al., “The MeerKAT Pulsar Timing Array: the first search for gravitational waves with the MeerKAT radio telescope,”Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.536no. 2, (2024) 1489–1500,arXiv:2412.01153 [astro-ph.HE]. [24]NANOGravCollaboration, G. Agazieet al., “The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Evidence for a Gravitational-wave Background,”Astrophys. J. Lett.951...

    work page arXiv 2024

  23. [23]

    Search for an isotropic gravitational-wave background with the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array

    D. J. Reardonet al., “Search for an Isotropic Gravitational-wave Background with the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array,”Astrophys. J. Lett.951no. 1, (2023) L6, arXiv:2306.16215 [astro-ph.HE]. [26]NANOGravCollaboration, G. Agazieet al., “The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Observations and Timing of 68 Millisecond Pulsars,”Astrophys. J. Lett.951no. 1, (2023) L9, arXiv:2...

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2023

  24. [24]

    Observational Signatures of Supermassive Black Hole Binaries,

    D. J. D’Orazio and M. Charisi, “Observational Signatures of Supermassive Black Hole Binaries,” 10, 2023. arXiv:2310.16896 [astro-ph.HE]. [29]NANOGravCollaboration, A. Afzalet al., “The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Search for Signals from New Physics,” Astrophys. J. Lett.951no. 1, (2023) L11,arXiv:2306.16219 [astro-ph.HE]. [Erratum: Astrophys.J.Lett. 971, L27 ...

    work page arXiv 2023

  25. [25]

    Cosmological Backgrounds of Gravitational Waves,

    C. Caprini and D. G. Figueroa, “Cosmological Backgrounds of Gravitational Waves,”Class. Quant. Grav.35no. 16, (2018) 163001,arXiv:1801.04268 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2018

  26. [26]

    From NANOGrav to LIGO with metastable cosmic strings,

    W . Buchmuller, V . Domcke, and K. Schmitz, “From NANOGrav to LIGO with metastable cosmic strings,”Phys. Lett. B811(2020) 135914,arXiv:2009.10649 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2020

  27. [27]

    Gravitational radiation from cosmic strings,

    A. Vilenkin, “Gravitational radiation from cosmic strings,” Phys. Lett. B107(1981) 47–50

    1981

  28. [28]

    Gravitational Radiation from Cosmic Strings,

    T . Vachaspati and A. Vilenkin, “Gravitational Radiation from Cosmic Strings,”Phys. Rev. D31(1985) 3052

    1985

  29. [29]

    Gravitational wave bursts from cusps and kinks on cosmic strings,

    T . Damour and A. Vilenkin, “Gravitational wave bursts from cusps and kinks on cosmic strings,”Phys. Rev. D64(2001) 064008,arXiv:gr-qc/0104026

    work page arXiv 2001

  30. [30]

    Gravitational radiation from cosmic (super)strings: Bursts, stochastic background, and observational windows,

    T . Damour and A. Vilenkin, “Gravitational radiation from cosmic (super)strings: Bursts, stochastic background, and observational windows,”Phys. Rev. D71(2005) 063510, arXiv:hep-th/0410222

    work page arXiv 2005

  31. [31]

    Cosmic Archaeology with Gravitational Waves from Cosmic Strings,

    Y. Cui, M. Lewicki, D. E. Morrissey, and J. D. Wells, “Cosmic Archaeology with Gravitational Waves from Cosmic Strings,”Phys. Rev. D97no. 12, (2018) 123505, arXiv:1711.03104 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2018

  32. [32]

    Probing the pre-BBN universe with gravitational waves from cosmic strings,

    Y. Cui, M. Lewicki, D. E. Morrissey, and J. D. Wells, “Probing the pre-BBN universe with gravitational waves from cosmic strings,”JHEP01(2019) 081,arXiv:1808.08968 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2019

  33. [33]

    Beyond the Standard Models with Cosmic Strings,

    Y. Gouttenoire, G. Servant, and P . Simakachorn, “Beyond the Standard Models with Cosmic Strings,”JCAP07(2020) 032, arXiv:1912.02569 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  34. [34]

    BSM with Cosmic Strings: Heavy, up to EeV mass, Unstable Particles,

    Y. Gouttenoire, G. Servant, and P . Simakachorn, “BSM with Cosmic Strings: Heavy, up to EeV mass, Unstable Particles,” JCAP07(2020) 016,arXiv:1912.03245 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  35. [35]

    Probing the gravitational wave background from cosmic strings with LISA,

    P . Auclairet al., “Probing the gravitational wave background from cosmic strings with LISA,”JCAP04(2020) 034, arXiv:1909.00819 [astro-ph.CO]. [42]LISA Cosmology Working GroupCollaboration, J. J. Blanco-Pillado, Y. Cui, S. Kuroyanagi, M. Lewicki, G. Nardini, M. Pieroni, I. Y. Rybak, L. Sousa, and J. M. Wachter, “Gravitational waves from cosmic strings in ...

    work page arXiv 2020

  36. [36]

    Cosmic string gravitational wave backgrounds at LISA: I. Signal survey, template reconstruction, and model comparison,

    A. Dimitriou, D. G. Figueroa, P . Simakachorn, and B. Zaldivar, “Cosmic string gravitational wave backgrounds at LISA: I. Signal survey, template reconstruction, and model comparison,”arXiv:2508.05395 [astro-ph.CO]. [44]LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRACollaboration, A. G. Abac et al., “Cosmological and High Energy Physics implications from gravitational-wave...

    work page arXiv

  37. [37]

    From new physics to a running power law and back again: Minimal refitting techniques for the reconstruction of the gravitational-wave background signal in pulsar timing array data,

    D. Esmyol, A. J. Iovino, and K. Schmitz, “From new physics to a running power law and back again: Minimal refitting techniques for the reconstruction of the gravitational-wave background signal in pulsar timing array data,” arXiv:2506.23574 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv

  38. [38]

    Cosmic String Interpretation of NANOGrav Pulsar Timing Data,

    J. Ellis and M. Lewicki, “Cosmic String Interpretation of NANOGrav Pulsar Timing Data,”Phys. Rev. Lett.126no. 4, (2021) 041304,arXiv:2009.06555 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2021

  39. [39]

    Has NANOGrav found first evidence for cosmic strings?,

    S. Blasi, V . Brdar, and K. Schmitz, “Has NANOGrav found first evidence for cosmic strings?,”Phys. Rev. Lett.126no. 4, (2021) 041305,arXiv:2009.06607 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2021

  40. [40]

    Comparison of cosmic string and superstring models to NANOGrav 12.5-year results,

    J. J. Blanco-Pillado, K. D. Olum, and J. M. Wachter, “Comparison of cosmic string and superstring models to NANOGrav 12.5-year results,”Phys. Rev. D103no. 10, (2021) 103512,arXiv:2102.08194 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2021

  41. [41]

    Stochastic gravitational-wave background from metastable cosmic strings,

    W . Buchmuller, V . Domcke, and K. Schmitz, “Stochastic gravitational-wave background from metastable cosmic strings,”JCAP12no. 12, (2021) 006,arXiv:2107.04578 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  42. [42]

    Gravitational Waves from Broken Cosmic Strings: The Bursts and the Beads,

    L. Leblond, B. Shlaer, and X. Siemens, “Gravitational Waves from Broken Cosmic Strings: The Bursts and the Beads,” Phys. Rev. D79(2009) 123519,arXiv:0903.4686 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2009

  43. [43]

    Singling out SO(10) GUT models using recent PTA results,

    S. Antusch, K. Hinze, S. Saad, and J. Steiner, “Singling out SO(10) GUT models using recent PTA results,”Phys. Rev. D 108no. 9, (2023) 095053,arXiv:2307.04595 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  44. [44]

    Inflation, superheavy metastable strings and gravitational waves in non-supersymmetric flipped SU(5),

    G. Lazarides, R. Maji, A. Moursy, and Q. Shafi, “Inflation, superheavy metastable strings and gravitational waves in non-supersymmetric flipped SU(5),”JCAP03(2024) 006, arXiv:2308.07094 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  45. [45]

    Supersymmetric hybrid inflation and current-carrying metastable cosmic strings in SU(4)c×SU(2)L×U(1)R,

    A. Afzal, M. Mehmood, M. U. Rehman, and Q. Shafi, “Supersymmetric hybrid inflation and current-carrying metastable cosmic strings in SU(4)c×SU(2)L×U(1)R,”Phys. Rev. D112no. 8, (2025) 083545–23,arXiv:2308.11410 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  46. [46]

    Gravitational waves from metastable cosmic strings in the Pati-Salam model in light of new pulsar timing array data,

    W . Ahmed, T . A. Chowdhury, S. Nasri, and S. Saad, “Gravitational waves from metastable cosmic strings in the Pati-Salam model in light of new pulsar timing array data,” Phys. Rev. D109no. 1, (2024) 015008,arXiv:2308.13248 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  47. [47]

    Gravitational wave emission from metastable current-carrying strings in E6,

    A. Afzal, Q. Shafi, and A. Tiwari, “Gravitational wave emission from metastable current-carrying strings in E6,” Phys. Lett. B850(2024) 138516,arXiv:2311.05564 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  48. [48]

    Quantum tunneling in the early universe: stable magnetic monopoles from metastable cosmic strings,

    G. Lazarides, R. Maji, and Q. Shafi, “Quantum tunneling in the early universe: stable magnetic monopoles from metastable cosmic strings,”JCAP05(2024) 128, arXiv:2402.03128 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  49. [49]

    Inflation, proton decay and gravitational waves from metastable strings in SU(4)C × SU(2)L × U(1)R model,

    W . Ahmed, M. Mehmood, M. U. Rehman, and U. Zubair, “Inflation, proton decay and gravitational waves from metastable strings in SU(4)C × SU(2)L × U(1)R model,”JCAP 09(2025) 035,arXiv:2404.06008 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  50. [50]

    Explaining PTA results by metastable cosmic strings from SO(10) GUT,

    S. Antusch, K. Hinze, and S. Saad, “Explaining PTA results by metastable cosmic strings from SO(10) GUT,”JCAP10 (2024) 007,arXiv:2406.17014 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  51. [51]

    Cosmic superstrings, metastable strings and ultralight primordial black holes: from NANOGrav to LIGO and beyond,

    S. Datta and R. Samanta, “Cosmic superstrings, metastable strings and ultralight primordial black holes: from NANOGrav to LIGO and beyond,”JHEP02(2025) 095, arXiv:2409.03498 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  52. [52]

    Induced gravitational waves, metastable cosmic strings and primordial black holes in GUTs,

    R. Maji, A. Moursy, and Q. Shafi, “Induced gravitational waves, metastable cosmic strings and primordial black holes in GUTs,”JCAP01(2025) 106,arXiv:2409.13584 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  53. [53]

    T-model Higgs inflation and metastable cosmic 16 strings,

    C. Pallis, “T-model Higgs inflation and metastable cosmic 16 strings,”JHEP01(2025) 178,arXiv:2409.14338 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  54. [54]

    µ-hybrid inflation and metastable cosmic strings in SU(3)c×SU(2)L×SU(2)R×U(1)B-L,

    M. N. Ahmad, M. Mehmood, M. U. Rehman, and Q. Shafi, “µ-hybrid inflation and metastable cosmic strings in SU(3)c×SU(2)L×SU(2)R×U(1)B-L,”Phys. Rev. D111no. 8, (2025) 083526,arXiv:2501.06307 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  55. [55]

    Gravitational waves from metastable cosmic strings in the delayed scaling scenario,

    Y. Hu and K. Kamada, “Gravitational waves from metastable cosmic strings in the delayed scaling scenario,”JCAP04 (2025) 044,arXiv:2501.18380 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  56. [56]

    Metastable cosmic strings and gravitational waves from flavor symmetry breaking,

    S. Antusch, K. Hinze, and S. Saad, “Metastable cosmic strings and gravitational waves from flavor symmetry breaking,”Phys. Rev. D112no. 3, (2025) 035043, arXiv:2503.05868 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  57. [57]

    Superheavy metastable strings in SO(10),

    R. Maji and Q. Shafi, “Superheavy metastable strings in SO(10),”JHEP06(2025) 217,arXiv:2504.09055 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  58. [58]

    Pallis, [arXiv:2504.20273 [hep-ph]]

    C. Pallis, “F-Term Hybrid Inflation, Metastable Cosmic Strings and Low Reheating in View of ACT,”PoS CORFU2024(2025) 206,arXiv:2504.20273 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  59. [59]

    Metastable Strings and Gravitational Waves in One-Scale Models,

    J. Ingoldby, V . V . Khoze, and J. Turner, “Metastable Strings and Gravitational Waves in One-Scale Models,” arXiv:2511.08546 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  60. [60]

    Evolution of Cosmic Strings,

    A. Albrecht and N. Turok, “Evolution of Cosmic Strings,” Phys. Rev. Lett.54(1985) 1868–1871

    1985

  61. [61]

    Evolution of Cosmic String Networks,

    A. Albrecht and N. Turok, “Evolution of Cosmic String Networks,”Phys. Rev. D40(1989) 973–1001

    1989

  62. [62]

    Cosmological evolution of cosmic string loops,

    C. Ringeval, M. Sakellariadou, and F . Bouchet, “Cosmological evolution of cosmic string loops,”JCAP02 (2007) 023,arXiv:astro-ph/0511646

    work page arXiv 2007

  63. [63]

    Large parallel cosmic string simulations: New results on loop production,

    J. J. Blanco-Pillado, K. D. Olum, and B. Shlaer, “Large parallel cosmic string simulations: New results on loop production,”Phys. Rev. D83(2011) 083514, arXiv:1101.5173 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2011

  64. [64]

    The Spontaneous breaking of a metastable string,

    A. Monin and M. B. Voloshin, “The Spontaneous breaking of a metastable string,”Phys. Rev. D78(2008) 065048, arXiv:0808.1693 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2008

  65. [65]

    Metastable cosmic strings are broken at the start,

    L. Tranchedone, E. Carragher, E. Hardy, and N. K. van IJcken, “Metastable cosmic strings are broken at the start,” arXiv:2601.04320 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  66. [66]

    Gravitational waves from quasi-stable strings,

    G. Lazarides, R. Maji, and Q. Shafi, “Gravitational waves from quasi-stable strings,”JCAP08no. 08, (2022) 042, arXiv:2203.11204 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  67. [67]

    Superheavy quasistable strings and walls bounded by strings in the light of NANOGrav 15 year data,

    G. Lazarides, R. Maji, and Q. Shafi, “Superheavy quasistable strings and walls bounded by strings in the light of NANOGrav 15 year data,”Phys. Rev. D108no. 9, (2023) 095041,arXiv:2306.17788 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  68. [68]

    Magnetic monopoles and high frequency gravitational waves from quasi-stable strings,

    R. Maji and Q. Shafi, “Magnetic monopoles and high frequency gravitational waves from quasi-stable strings,” arXiv:2603.02996 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  69. [69]

    Gravitational waves from cosmic strings for pedestrians,

    K. Schmitz and T . Schroeder, “Gravitational waves from cosmic strings for pedestrians,”JCAP01(2026) 025, arXiv:2412.20907 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2026

  70. [70]

    Evolution of a system of cosmic strings,

    T . W . B. Kibble, “Evolution of a system of cosmic strings,” Nucl. Phys. B252(1985) 227. [Erratum: Nucl.Phys.B 261, 750 (1985)]

    1985

  71. [71]

    Quantitative string evolution,

    C. J. A. P . Martins and E. P . S. Shellard, “Quantitative string evolution,”Phys. Rev. D54(1996) 2535–2556, arXiv:hep-ph/9602271

    work page arXiv 1996

  72. [72]

    Extending the velocity dependent one scale string evolution model,

    C. J. A. P . Martins and E. P . S. Shellard, “Extending the velocity dependent one scale string evolution model,”Phys. Rev. D65(2002) 043514,arXiv:hep-ph/0003298

    work page arXiv 2002

  73. [73]

    Gravitational waves from low-scale cosmic strings,

    K. Schmitz and T . Schröder, “Gravitational waves from low-scale cosmic strings,”Phys. Rev. D110no. 6, (2024) 063549,arXiv:2405.10937 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2024

  74. [74]

    Stochastic gravitational wave background from smoothed cosmic string loops,

    J. J. Blanco-Pillado and K. D. Olum, “Stochastic gravitational wave background from smoothed cosmic string loops,” Phys. Rev. D96no. 10, (2017) 104046,arXiv:1709.02693 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2017

  75. [75]

    Numerical gravitational backreaction on cosmic string loops from simulations,

    J. M. Wachter, K. D. Olum, J. J. Blanco-Pillado, V . R. Gade, and K. Sivakumar, “Numerical gravitational backreaction on cosmic string loops from simulations,”Phys. Rev. D113 no. 4, (2026) 043521,arXiv:2411.10366 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2026

  76. [76]

    More accurate gravitational wave backgrounds from cosmic strings,

    J. M. Wachter, K. D. Olum, and J. J. Blanco-Pillado, “More accurate gravitational wave backgrounds from cosmic strings,”arXiv:2411.16590 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv

  77. [77]

    Ultrahigh frequency primordial gravitational waves beyond the kHz: The case of cosmic strings,

    G. Servant and P . Simakachorn, “Ultrahigh frequency primordial gravitational waves beyond the kHz: The case of cosmic strings,”Phys. Rev. D109no. 10, (2024) 103538, arXiv:2312.09281 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  78. [78]

    Gravitational waves from low-scale cosmic strings without scaling,

    K. Schmitz and T . Schröder, “Gravitational waves from low-scale cosmic strings without scaling,”Phys. Rev. D112 no. 8, (2025) 083517,arXiv:2505.04537 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  79. [79]

    Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background generated by Cosmic String Networks: Velocity-Dependent One-Scale model versus Scale-Invariant Evolution,

    L. Sousa and P . P . Avelino, “Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background generated by Cosmic String Networks: Velocity-Dependent One-Scale model versus Scale-Invariant Evolution,”Phys. Rev. D88no. 2, (2013) 023516,arXiv:1304.2445 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2013

  80. [80]

    The number of cosmic string loops,

    J. J. Blanco-Pillado, K. D. Olum, and B. Shlaer, “The number of cosmic string loops,”Phys. Rev. D89no. 2, (2014) 023512, arXiv:1309.6637 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2014

Showing first 80 references.