pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.01338 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-02 · 💻 cs.AI

Recognition: unknown

DiagramNet: An End-to-End Recognition Framework and Dataset for Non-Standard System-Level Diagrams

Jincheng Lou , Ruohan Xu , Jiapeng Li , Junyin Pi , Runzhe Tao , Weijian Fan , Xiao Tan , Guojie Luo
show 1 more author
Yibo Lin
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-09 14:34 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.AI
keywords system-level diagramsdiagram recognitionmultimodal datasetmulti-agent workflowchip designvisual reasoningEDAconnection extraction
0
0 comments X

The pith

A Perception-Reasoning-Knowledge workflow and new dataset let a 3B model outperform GPT-5 and the 2025 EDA challenge winner on non-standard chip system diagrams.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper creates DiagramNet, the first large multimodal dataset of non-standard system-level diagrams with 10,977 connection annotations and 15,515 chain-of-thought QA pairs spanning four tasks. It then trains a 3B-parameter model with a progressive pipeline and applies a decoupled multi-agent workflow that splits the problem into separate Perception, Reasoning, and Knowledge stages. On the resulting benchmark this combination exceeds the prior industry winner and more than doubles the end-to-end scores of GPT-5, Claude-Sonnet-4, and Gemini-2.5-Pro. The same workflow also lifts the large models themselves and transfers to another benchmark with only 60 adaptation images.

Core claim

By releasing DiagramNet and training on its four tasks, a decoupled multi-agent workflow that decomposes diagram interpretation into Perception, Reasoning, and Knowledge stages enables a 3B model to surpass both the 2025 EDA Elite Challenge winner and leading frontier models by more than 2x in end-to-end accuracy while generalizing to boost those larger models and to zero-shot connectivity reasoning on AMSBench.

What carries the argument

The decoupled multi-agent workflow that decomposes complex visual reasoning into separate Perception, Reasoning, and Knowledge stages, trained progressively on the DiagramNet dataset of connection annotations and QA pairs.

If this is right

  • The workflow lifts Task 1 performance of Gemini-2.5-Pro by 128.7x and of GPT-5 by 12.4x without changing the underlying models.
  • With only 60 images for detector adaptation the method reaches parity with GPT-5 and Claude-Sonnet-4 on zero-shot connectivity reasoning for AMSBench.
  • The same decomposition surpasses the prior AMS state-of-the-art method Netlistify on connectivity reasoning.
  • End-to-end evaluation on DiagramNet becomes the new reference point for system-level diagram understanding in EDA.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Engineers could insert the workflow into existing design-review pipelines to reduce manual tracing of module connections.
  • The same staged decomposition may apply to other domains that mix visual layout with domain-specific rules, such as electrical schematics or floor plans.
  • Future work could test whether the Perception stage alone can be replaced by an off-the-shelf detector without retraining the full pipeline.

Load-bearing premise

The four defined tasks and the Perception-Reasoning-Knowledge decomposition accurately represent the real difficulties engineers face when interpreting non-standard system-level diagrams in production chip design flows.

What would settle it

Running the trained model and workflow on a new collection of proprietary, previously unseen system-level diagrams drawn directly from active chip design projects and measuring end-to-end accuracy against human experts.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.01338 by Guojie Luo, Jiapeng Li, Jincheng Lou, Junyin Pi, Runzhe Tao, Ruohan Xu, Weijian Fan, Xiao Tan, Yibo Lin.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Overview of the DiagramNet dataset and our end-to-end multi-agent workflow, which eliminates time-consuming manual recognition that requires domain expertise. 1. Introduction AI techniques have advanced rapidly and are reshaping electronic design automation (EDA). Traditional methods include graph neural networks for chip placement (Mirho￾seini et al., 2021) and GPU-accelerated gradient-based op￾timization… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (a) System-level diagrams across three aspects: circuit type ( A analog, D digital), design stage (front-end/back-end), and abstraction level (macro to device/gate). (b) The DiagramNet framework comprises three parts. The problem definition, DiagramNet dataset, and training pipeline together constitute an end-to-end recognition framework for system-level diagrams. els. They depict abstract architectures ra… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Architecture of the proposed multi-agent workflow. The Perception Agent detects components and applies row-major ordering to form a structured layout. The Reasoning Agent predicts directed connections per source component with a VLM backbone. The Knowledge Agent decides whether to activate task-specific LoRA adapters for Circuit QA and outputs the final answer. YOLO handles final inference, but RL training… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Prompts used in Task Definitions. To illustrate the rationale behind our method, this section presents the exploration of end-to-end, YOLO-assisted, and multi-agent workflow approaches for system-level diagram recognition, along with representative prompts shown in view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Component detection visualizations. (a) Our workflow with YOLO annotations. (b)–(d) Component locations rendered from Task 1 outputs of Claude, GPT-5, and Gemini-2.5-Pro. Claude produces more stable coordinates with approximately 40% hit rate, but this remains insufficient for high-precision detection. After introducing our multi-agent workflow, Task 1 scores improve substantially: 128.7× for Gemini-2.5-Pr… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Representative S3 error cases on DiagramNet. Failure mode analysis: sources of S3 errors on DiagramNet. Our method achieves 0.855 on Task 1, compared to 0.862 for EDA Elite Winner. On S3, our score is 0.736 versus 0.777. The gap is concentrated in a small set of ambiguous samples and does not reflect a systematic failure of the recognition pipeline view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Gap analysis on the Textual Circuit QA subset of AMSBench. Gap analysis on Textual QA. We compare DiagramNet-3B with EDA Elite Winner on the text-only TQA subset of AMSBench. On 30 questions, our model achieves 27/30 (accuracy 0.900), while EDA Elite Winner achieves 28/30 (accuracy 0.933). The two models differ on three questions; in two cases our model errs while the competitor answers correctly, explaini… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

System-level diagrams encode the architectural blueprint of chip design, specifying module functions, dataflows, and interface protocols. However, non-standardized symbols and the scarcity of structured training data hinder existing multimodal large language models (MLLMs) from recognizing these diagrams. To address this gap, we introduce DiagramNet, the first multimodal dataset for system-level diagrams, comprising 10,977 connection annotations and 15,515 chain-of-thought QA pairs across four tasks: Listing, Localization, Connection, and Circuit QA. Building on this dataset, we propose a progressive training pipeline together with a decoupled multi-agent workflow that decomposes complex visual reasoning into Perception, Reasoning, and Knowledge stages. On the DiagramNet benchmark, integrating our 3B-parameter model with the proposed workflow surpasses the 2025 EDA Elite Challenge winner and outperforms GPT-5, Claude-Sonnet-4, and Gemini-2.5-Pro by over 2x in end-to-end evaluation. Notably, the workflow generalizes beyond our model, boosting Task 1 performance by 128.7x for Gemini-2.5-Pro and 12.4x for GPT-5. Furthermore, with only 60 images for detector adaptation, the method transfers effectively to AMSBench, achieving zero-shot connectivity reasoning on par with GPT-5 and Claude-Sonnet-4 while surpassing the AMS state-of-the-art method Netlistify.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces DiagramNet, the first multimodal dataset for non-standard system-level diagrams in chip design, comprising 10,977 connection annotations and 15,515 chain-of-thought QA pairs across four tasks: Listing, Localization, Connection, and Circuit QA. It proposes a progressive training pipeline and a decoupled multi-agent workflow that decomposes visual reasoning into Perception, Reasoning, and Knowledge stages. The central empirical claims are that a 3B-parameter model integrated with this workflow surpasses the 2025 EDA Elite Challenge winner and outperforms GPT-5, Claude-Sonnet-4, and Gemini-2.5-Pro by over 2x in end-to-end evaluation on DiagramNet, that the workflow generalizes to deliver large boosts (e.g., 128.7x on Task 1 for Gemini-2.5-Pro), and that the approach transfers effectively to AMSBench with only 60 images for detector adaptation.

Significance. If the four tasks and Perception-Reasoning-Knowledge decomposition are shown to be faithful proxies for real production difficulties in interpreting non-standard system-level diagrams, the work would provide a valuable new benchmark and practical method for domain-specific multimodal reasoning in chip design. The creation of a sizable annotated dataset and the observed cross-model generalization of the workflow are clear strengths. The minimal-data transfer result to AMSBench is also noteworthy. However, the current lack of validation for task realism and incomplete experimental reporting limit the assessed significance.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3] §3 (Dataset Construction and Task Definitions): The four tasks (Listing, Localization, Connection, Circuit QA) and the Perception-Reasoning-Knowledge decomposition are introduced without any description of derivation from actual chip-design engineer workflows, common error modes, expert review, or user studies. This is load-bearing for the headline claims because the reported 2x end-to-end superiority and 128.7x/12.4x generalization boosts rest entirely on these tasks serving as accurate proxies for production difficulties.
  2. [§5] §5 (Experimental Results): No error bars, standard deviations, or details on the number of runs are provided for any performance numbers, including the end-to-end comparisons and the specific multipliers (128.7x, 12.4x). Ablation studies isolating the progressive training pipeline from the multi-agent workflow stages are absent, and the full evaluation protocol (prompting templates, metric definitions, and baseline implementations) is not fully specified, preventing independent verification of the central empirical claims.
  3. [§5.3] §5.3 (AMSBench Transfer): The zero-shot connectivity reasoning result on AMSBench after adapting with only 60 images is presented without details on the adaptation procedure, exact baselines (including how Netlistify was re-implemented), or statistical comparison to GPT-5/Claude-Sonnet-4, making the transfer claim difficult to assess.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and §5] The abstract and §5 use multipliers such as 'over 2x' and '128.7x' without immediately defining the underlying metric (e.g., exact accuracy or F1) or the precise baseline configuration for each comparison.
  2. [§4] Figure captions and the workflow diagram in §4 could more explicitly label the interfaces between the Perception, Reasoning, and Knowledge agents to improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed feedback. We agree that clarifying the grounding of the tasks in real workflows and providing fuller experimental details will strengthen the paper. We address each major comment below and will make the corresponding revisions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: §3 (Dataset Construction and Task Definitions): The four tasks (Listing, Localization, Connection, Circuit QA) and the Perception-Reasoning-Knowledge decomposition are introduced without any description of derivation from actual chip-design engineer workflows, common error modes, expert review, or user studies. This is load-bearing for the headline claims because the reported 2x end-to-end superiority and 128.7x/12.4x generalization boosts rest entirely on these tasks serving as accurate proxies for production difficulties.

    Authors: We agree that explicit documentation of task derivation is important for validating the proxy relationship to production difficulties. The tasks and Perception-Reasoning-Knowledge decomposition were developed from analysis of common challenges in non-standard system-level diagrams as described in chip-design literature and from preliminary input by EDA domain experts during dataset curation. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated subsection in §3 that details this process, including observed error modes in baseline MLLM outputs, how each task maps to engineer workflows, and a summary of expert feedback obtained during annotation. This will directly support the reported performance gains. revision: yes

  2. Referee: §5 (Experimental Results): No error bars, standard deviations, or details on the number of runs are provided for any performance numbers, including the end-to-end comparisons and the specific multipliers (128.7x, 12.4x). Ablation studies isolating the progressive training pipeline from the multi-agent workflow stages are absent, and the full evaluation protocol (prompting templates, metric definitions, and baseline implementations) is not fully specified, preventing independent verification of the central empirical claims.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the current experimental reporting lacks statistical rigor and reproducibility details. In the revision we will recompute and report all key metrics (including the 2x end-to-end gains and the 128.7x/12.4x multipliers) with error bars and standard deviations over 5 independent runs. We will insert new ablation experiments that separately measure the contribution of the progressive training pipeline versus each stage of the multi-agent workflow. A new appendix will supply the complete evaluation protocol: all prompting templates, exact metric definitions, and step-by-step baseline re-implementations. revision: yes

  3. Referee: §5.3 (AMSBench Transfer): The zero-shot connectivity reasoning result on AMSBench after adapting with only 60 images is presented without details on the adaptation procedure, exact baselines (including how Netlistify was re-implemented), or statistical comparison to GPT-5/Claude-Sonnet-4, making the transfer claim difficult to assess.

    Authors: We will expand §5.3 with a full description of the detector adaptation procedure using the 60 images, the precise re-implementation steps for Netlistify following its original publication, and direct statistical comparisons (means and standard deviations over multiple runs) of our method against GPT-5 and Claude-Sonnet-4 on the AMSBench connectivity tasks. These additions will make the transfer results and zero-shot performance claims fully verifiable. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: performance claims rest on new dataset and external model comparisons

full rationale

The paper introduces DiagramNet as a new multimodal dataset with four tasks and a decoupled Perception-Reasoning-Knowledge workflow, then reports empirical results of its 3B model plus workflow against external baselines (GPT-5, Claude-Sonnet-4, Gemini-2.5-Pro, EDA winner, AMSBench SOTA). No equations, parameter fits, self-citations, or ansatzes are invoked to derive the reported gains; the 2x end-to-end and 128.7x Task-1 improvements are direct measurements on held-out or transferred data rather than reductions to the inputs by construction. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on empirical dataset construction and workflow design rather than mathematical derivation; no free parameters, new physical entities, or unstated axioms beyond standard machine-learning assumptions are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Non-standardized symbols and scarcity of structured training data prevent existing MLLMs from recognizing system-level diagrams.
    This premise is stated directly in the abstract as the motivation for creating DiagramNet.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 9662 in / 1265 out tokens · 45720 ms · 2026-05-09T14:34:01.391969+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

31 extracted references · 22 canonical work pages · 4 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    2025 china postgraduate ic innovation competition: Eda elite challenge contest, 2025

    2025 EDA Elite Challenge Contest . 2025 china postgraduate ic innovation competition: Eda elite challenge contest, 2025. URL http://www.edachallenge.cn. Accessed: 2026-01-26

    2025

  2. [2]

    Qwen2.5-VL Technical Report

    Bai, S., Chen, K., Liu, X., et al. Qwen2.5-vl technical report, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.13923

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  3. [3]

    doi:10.1109/TCAD.2023.3287970

    Chai, Z., Zhao, Y., Liu, W., et al. CircuitNet : An Open - Source Dataset for Machine Learning in VLSI CAD Applications With Improved Domain - Specific Evaluation Metric and Learning Strategies . IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems, 42 0 (12): 0 5034--5047, December 2023. ISSN 1937-4151. doi:10.1109/TCAD.2023.3287...

    work page doi:10.1109/tcad.2023.3287970 2023

  4. [4]

    DeepSeek-R1 incentivizes reasoning in LLMs through reinforcement learning

    Guo, D., Yang, D., Zhang, H., et al. Deepseek-r1 incentivizes reasoning in llms through reinforcement learning. Nature, 645 0 (8081): 0 633–638, September 2025. ISSN 1476-4687. doi:10.1038/s41586-025-09422-z. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09422-z

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-025-09422-z 2025

  5. [5]

    Hiippala, T., Alikhani, M., Haverinen, J., Kalliokoski, T., Logacheva, E., Orekhova, S., Tuomainen, A., Stone, M., and Bateman, J. A. AI2D-RST : a multimodal corpus of 1000 primary school science diagrams. Language Resources and Evaluation, 55 0 (3): 0 661–688, December 2020. ISSN 1574-0218. doi:10.1007/s10579-020-09517-1. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s1...

    work page doi:10.1007/s10579-020-09517-1 2020

  6. [6]

    Available: https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v39i1.32007

    Ho, C.-T., Ren, H., and Khailany, B. VerilogCoder : Autonomous verilog coding agents with graph-based planning and abstract syntax tree (ast)-based waveform tracing tool. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 39 0 (1): 0 300--307, Apr. 2025. doi:10.1609/aaai.v39i1.32007. URL https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/AAAI/article/view/32007

    work page doi:10.1609/aaai.v39i1.32007 2025

  7. [7]

    In2025 ACM/IEEE 7th Symposium on Machine Learning for CAD (MLCAD)

    Huang, C.-Y., Chen, H.-I., Ho, H.-W., Kang, P.-H., Lin, M. P.-H., Liu, W.-H., and Ren, H. Netlistify: Transforming circuit schematics into netlists with deep learning. In 2025 ACM/IEEE 7th Symposium on Machine Learning for CAD (MLCAD), pp.\ 1--8, 2025 a . doi:10.1109/MLCAD65511.2025.11189145

    work page doi:10.1109/mlcad65511.2025.11189145 2025

  8. [8]

    Boosting mllm reasoning with text-debiased hint-grpo.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.23905,

    Huang, Q., Dai, W., Liu, J., et al. Boosting mllm reasoning with text-debiased hint-grpo, 2025 b . URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.23905

    work page arXiv 2025

  9. [9]

    CircuitNet 2.0 : An advanced dataset for promoting machine learning innovations in realistic chip design environment

    Jiang, X., zhuomin chai, Zhao, Y., Lin, Y., Wang, R., and Huang, R. CircuitNet 2.0 : An advanced dataset for promoting machine learning innovations in realistic chip design environment. In The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations, 2024. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=nMFSUjxMIl

    2024

  10. [10]

    A diagram is worth a dozen images

    Kembhavi, A., Seo, M., Schwenk, D., et al. A diagram is worth a dozen images. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pp.\ 235--251, 2016

    2016

  11. [11]

    Lin, Y., Jiang, Z., Gu, J., Li, W., Dhar, S., Ren, H., Khailany, B., and Pan, D. Z. DREAMPlace : Deep learning toolkit-enabled gpu acceleration for modern vlsi placement. IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems, 40 0 (4): 0 748--761, 2021. doi:10.1109/TCAD.2020.3003843

    work page doi:10.1109/tcad.2020.3003843 2021

  12. [12]

    URLhttps://doi.org/10.1109/ICCAD57390.2023.10323812

    Liu, M., Pinckney, N., Khailany, B., and Ren, H. Invited paper: VerilogEval : Evaluating large language models for verilog code generation. In 2023 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer Aided Design (ICCAD), pp.\ 1--8, 2023. doi:10.1109/ICCAD57390.2023.10323812

    work page doi:10.1109/iccad57390.2023.10323812 2023

  13. [13]

    Chipnemo: Domain-adapted llms for chip design,

    Liu, M., Ene, T.-D., Kirby, R., et al. ChipNeMo : Domain - Adapted LLMs for Chip Design , April 2024 a . URL http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.00176. arXiv:2311.00176 [cs]

    work page arXiv 2024

  14. [14]

    RTLCoder : Outperforming gpt-3.5 in design rtl generation with our open-source dataset and lightweight solution

    Liu, S., Fang, W., Lu, Y., Zhang, Q., Zhang, H., and Xie, Z. RTLCoder : Outperforming gpt-3.5 in design rtl generation with our open-source dataset and lightweight solution. In 2024 IEEE LLM Aided Design Workshop (LAD), pp.\ 1--5, 2024 b . doi:10.1109/LAD62341.2024.10691788

    work page doi:10.1109/lad62341.2024.10691788 2024

  15. [15]

    RTLLM : An open-source benchmark for design rtl generation with large language model

    Lu, Y., Liu, S., Zhang, Q., and Xie, Z. RTLLM : An open-source benchmark for design rtl generation with large language model. In 2024 29th Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference (ASP-DAC), pp.\ 722--727, 2024. doi:10.1109/ASP-DAC58780.2024.10473904

    work page doi:10.1109/asp-dac58780.2024.10473904 2024

  16. [16]

    X., Tan, J

    Masry, A., Long, D. X., Tan, J. Q., et al. ChartQA : A benchmark for question answering about charts with visual and logical reasoning. In Findings of ACL, 2022

    2022

  17. [17]

    Mathew, M., Karatzas, D., and Jawahar, C. V. DocVQA : A dataset for vqa on document images. In IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision, pp.\ 2200--2209, 2021

    2021

  18. [18]

    A graph placement methodology for fast chip design

    Mirhoseini, A., Goldie, A., et al. A graph placement methodology for fast chip design. Nature, 594: 0 207--212, 2021

    2021

  19. [19]

    GPT-4 Technical Report

    OpenAI, Achiam, J., Adler, S., et al. GPT-4 Technical Report , 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.08774

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  20. [20]

    Sheng, C

    Sheng, G., Zhang, C., Ye, Z., Wu, X., Zhang, W., Zhang, R., Peng, Y., Lin, H., and Wu, C. HybridFlow : A flexible and efficient RLHF framework. In Proceedings of the Twentieth European Conference on Computer Systems, EuroSys '25, pp.\ 1279–1297, New York, NY, USA, 2025. Association for Computing Machinery. ISBN 9798400711961. doi:10.1145/3689031.3696075. ...

    work page doi:10.1145/3689031.3696075 2025

  21. [21]

    Amsnet 2.0: A large ams database with ai segmentation for net detection

    Shi, Y., Tao, Z., Gao, Y., Huang, L., Wang, H., Yu, Z., Lin, T.-J., and He, L. Amsnet 2.0: A large ams database with ai segmentation for net detection. In 2025 IEEE International Conference on LLM-Aided Design (ICLAD), pp.\ 242--248, 2025 a . doi:10.1109/ICLAD65226.2025.00014

    work page doi:10.1109/iclad65226.2025.00014 2025

  22. [22]

    AMSbench : A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating MLLM Capabilities in AMS Circuits , October 2025 b

    Shi, Y., Zhang, Z., Wang, H., et al. AMSbench : A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating MLLM Capabilities in AMS Circuits , October 2025 b . URL http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.24138. arXiv:2505.24138 [cs]

    work page arXiv 2025

  23. [23]

    D., Agarwal, R., et al

    Singh, A., Co-Reyes, J. D., Agarwal, R., et al. Beyond human data: Scaling self-training for problem-solving with language models. Transactions on Machine Learning Research, 2024. ISSN 2835-8856. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=lNAyUngGFK. Expert Certification

    2024

  24. [24]

    AMSNet : Netlist Dataset for AMS Circuits , October 2024

    Tao, Z., Shi, Y., Huo, Y., et al. AMSNet : Netlist Dataset for AMS Circuits , October 2024. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.09045. arXiv:2405.09045 [cs]

    work page arXiv 2024

  25. [25]

    Gemini: A Family of Highly Capable Multimodal Models

    Team, G., Anil, R., Borgeaud, S., et al. Gemini: A family of highly capable multimodal models, 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.11805

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  26. [26]

    Thakur, S. et al. VeriGen : A large language model for verilog code generation. In International Conference on Computer-Aided Design, 2023

    2023

  27. [27]

    RTLFixer : Automatically Fixing RTL Syntax Errors with Large Language Model

    Tsai, Y., Liu, M., and Ren, H. RTLFixer : Automatically Fixing RTL Syntax Errors with Large Language Model . In Proceedings of the 61st ACM / IEEE Design Automation Conference , pp.\ 1--6, San Francisco CA USA, June 2024. ACM. ISBN 979-8-4007-0601-1. doi:10.1145/3649329.3657353. URL https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3649329.3657353

    work page doi:10.1145/3649329.3657353 2024

  28. [28]

    Weste, N. H. E. and Harris, D. CMOS VLSI Design: A Circuits and Systems Perspective. Addison-Wesley, 4th edition, 2011

    2011

  29. [29]

    ChatEDA : A large language model powered autonomous agent for eda

    Wu, H., He, Z., Zhang, X., Yao, X., Zheng, S., Zheng, H., and Yu, B. ChatEDA : A large language model powered autonomous agent for eda. IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems, 43 0 (10): 0 3184--3197, 2024. doi:10.1109/TCAD.2024.3383347

    work page doi:10.1109/tcad.2024.3383347 2024

  30. [30]

    Image2Net : Datasets, benchmark and hybrid framework to convert analog circuit diagrams into netlists

    Xu, H., Liu, C., Wang, Q., Huang, W., Xu, Y., Chen, W., Peng, A., Li, Z., Li, B., Qi, L., Yang, J., Du, Y., and Du, L. Image2Net : Datasets, benchmark and hybrid framework to convert analog circuit diagrams into netlists. In 2025 International Symposium of Electronics Design Automation (ISEDA), pp.\ 807--816, 2025. doi:10.1109/ISEDA65950.2025.11100581

    work page doi:10.1109/iseda65950.2025.11100581 2025

  31. [31]

    LlamaFactory: Unified Efficient Fine-Tuning of 100+ Language Models

    Zheng, Y., Zhang, R., Zhang, J., et al. LlamaFactory : Unified efficient fine-tuning of 100+ language models. In Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 3: System Demonstrations), Bangkok, Thailand, 2024. Association for Computational Linguistics. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.13372

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2024