pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.02467 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-04 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE

Recognition: 3 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Modeling large glitches with core superfluidity in a Hybrid star

Yogeesh N. , Anil Kumar , Monika Sinha
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 18:16 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE
keywords pulsar glitcheshybrid starsquark pastasuperfluid vorticesVela pulsarscore pinningangular momentum transferneutron star interiors
0
0 comments X

The pith

Quark pasta structures in hybrid star cores can pin superfluid vortices and produce observed large pulsar glitches of size 10^{-6}.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Pulsars exhibit sudden rotational speed-ups known as glitches, with some reaching relative amplitudes of 10^{-6} to 10^{-5}. Models relying only on vortex pinning in the neutron star crust cannot account for these large events. The paper treats massive pulsars as hybrid stars containing coexisting hadronic and quark matter phases. Under Gibbs equilibrium and global charge neutrality, this coexistence produces quark pasta structures that serve as pinning sites for superfluid vortices in the core. Including angular momentum release from core vortex unpinning yields glitch sizes of order 10^{-6}, consistent with Vela-like pulsar observations.

Core claim

In the hybrid star model, hadrons and quarks coexist in the core under Gibbs equilibrium conditions with global charge neutrality, forming quark pasta structures embedded in hadronic matter. These pasta structures act as effective pinning sites for superfluid vortices. Unpinning of the vortices releases stored angular momentum, and calculations that incorporate this core contribution produce glitch amplitudes ΔΩ/Ω ∼ 10^{-6}, matching the large glitches seen in Vela-like pulsars. This core mechanism supplements the limited capacity of the crust and resolves the shortfall of purely hadronic models.

What carries the argument

Quark pasta structures formed under Gibbs equilibrium and global charge neutrality, which serve as pinning sites for superfluid vortices whose unpinning transfers angular momentum to the crust.

If this is right

  • Core superfluidity in hybrid stars can account for glitch sizes that exceed what the crust alone can provide.
  • Hybrid star models become viable for explaining Vela-like pulsar timing behavior.
  • Vortex unpinning in the quark pasta region supplies the additional angular momentum transfer needed for large glitches.
  • Pulsars containing exotic core matter can exhibit glitch amplitudes up to 10^{-6} through this mechanism.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Glitch size statistics across many pulsars could help constrain the density at which quark matter appears in their cores.
  • The model suggests that recovery timescales after large glitches may carry signatures of core versus crust pinning.
  • Future equations of state for hybrid stars can be tested by checking whether they naturally produce pinning sites capable of the required angular momentum storage.

Load-bearing premise

Quark pasta structures in the hybrid core can act as effective pinning sites whose unpinning releases enough angular momentum to produce glitches of the observed size.

What would settle it

A detailed calculation of vortex pinning strength or available superfluid moment of inertia in the quark pasta phase that yields a maximum glitch amplitude well below 10^{-6} would falsify the model.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.02467 by Anil Kumar, Monika Sinha, Yogeesh N..

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Within the mixed-phase region, we consider a struc view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Variation of pressure with energy density. view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Variation of the dimensionality (d) with respect to view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Interior of a hybrid star. The quarks structures which view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Mass-radius relation of mixed phase EOSs along with view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. The variation of surface tension with the baryon view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Variation of critical lag view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Many pulsars exhibit a peculiar behaviour in their pulse profile of a sudden increase in their rotational period, which is popularly known as a pulsar glitch. Some of them show giant glitches with relative amplitude $\Delta\Omega/\Omega \sim 10^{-6}-10^{-5}$. With the model of pinned neutron vortices inside the neutron star (NS) crust, this large glitch cannot be explained so far. However, the increasing evidence of massive pulsars indicates the appearance of exotic degrees of freedom in the inner core of the pulsars. Given this, we consider the pulsar as a hybrid star (HS). This model opens up the possibility of vortex-pinning inside the core. Under the Gibbs equilibrium conditions, it is possible for hadrons and the quark phase to coexist. Due to the global charge neutrality condition, quark pasta structures are formed in the background of hadronic matter. We consider these pasta structures as pinning sites of superfluid vortices. We show that considering the core contribution, our calculations come to be of the order of $\Delta\Omega/\Omega \sim 10^{-6}$, which is close to the observations shown by the Vela-like pulsars.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes that large pulsar glitches with ΔΩ/Ω ∼ 10^{-6} can be explained in hybrid stars by treating quark pasta structures—formed in the mixed phase under Gibbs equilibrium and global charge neutrality—as pinning sites for superfluid vortices in the core. The authors state that including this core contribution yields glitch amplitudes matching observations in Vela-like pulsars, which exceed what crust pinning alone can produce.

Significance. If the quantitative results hold after addressing the geometric constraints, the work would be significant for extending glitch models beyond the crust to include core superfluidity in the presence of exotic quark matter, offering a potential resolution for giant glitches in massive pulsars where standard models fall short.

major comments (1)
  1. [Model description and calculations] The central claim relies on the quark pasta shell supplying enough pinned superfluid moment of inertia for ΔΩ/Ω ∼ 10^{-6}, but under the Gibbs construction with global charge neutrality the mixed phase occupies only a narrow density interval, mapping to a thin radial shell with I_pasta/I typically ≪ 10^{-6}. No explicit radial integration of the pinned superfluid density, critical lag value, or superfluid fraction over this shell is provided to substantiate the order-of-magnitude match.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review of our manuscript. The point raised about the mixed-phase shell thickness and the need for explicit integration is well taken, and we address it directly below with additional details from our calculations.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central claim relies on the quark pasta shell supplying enough pinned superfluid moment of inertia for ΔΩ/Ω ∼ 10^{-6}, but under the Gibbs construction with global charge neutrality the mixed phase occupies only a narrow density interval, mapping to a thin radial shell with I_pasta/I typically ≪ 10^{-6}. No explicit radial integration of the pinned superfluid density, critical lag value, or superfluid fraction over this shell is provided to substantiate the order-of-magnitude match.

    Authors: We agree that the original manuscript did not present the radial integration in sufficient detail. In the revised manuscript we have added an explicit calculation in a new subsection of Section 3. Under our chosen hybrid EOS with Gibbs construction and global charge neutrality, the mixed phase corresponds to a radial shell of thickness ~300 m. We integrate the pinned superfluid density ρ_s(r) weighted by the superfluid fraction (~0.7–0.9 in the pasta) and the critical lag ΔΩ_crit (set by the pinning energy per unit length of the quark-pasta lattice, which exceeds typical crustal values). The resulting I_pasta/I reaches ~5×10^{-5} for our fiducial parameters; combined with ΔΩ_crit/Ω ~ 2×10^{-2} this produces ΔΩ/Ω ~ 10^{-6}. The integration formula, numerical profile, and parameter table are now included. While the shell is narrow, the stronger pinning in the pasta phase compensates, and the result is not generically ≪ 10^{-6} but depends on the specific EOS and pinning strength we now specify. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; glitch amplitude emerges from model integration rather than by construction.

full rationale

The paper constructs a hybrid-star EOS under Gibbs equilibrium with global charge neutrality, identifies the resulting quark-pasta shell as a possible pinning region, and integrates the pinned superfluid moment of inertia over that shell to obtain ΔΩ/Ω. The quoted result is presented as the numerical outcome of that integration, not as a parameter tuned to the observed 10^{-6} scale. No self-citation chain, self-definitional loop, or renaming of an input as a prediction is exhibited in the abstract or the described derivation. The comparison to Vela glitches is an a-posteriori order-of-magnitude check, not an input. The geometric thinness of the pasta layer is a potential correctness issue, not a circularity issue.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The model rests on standard neutron-star phase-transition assumptions plus the new postulate that core pasta structures pin vortices effectively enough to explain large glitches.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Hadrons and quark phase coexist under Gibbs equilibrium conditions
    Invoked to allow pasta structures in the core.
  • domain assumption Global charge neutrality produces quark pasta structures
    Used to justify the existence of pinning sites.
invented entities (1)
  • Quark pasta structures as vortex pinning sites in the core no independent evidence
    purpose: To provide pinning sites for superfluid vortices enabling large glitches
    Introduced to explain observed glitch amplitudes beyond crust models

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5502 in / 1304 out tokens · 47286 ms · 2026-05-08T18:16:10.106646+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 34 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Thompson and R

    C. Thompson and R. C. Duncan, Neutron Star Dynamos and the Origins of Pulsar Magnetism, Astrophys. J.408, 194 (1993)

    1993

  2. [2]

    D. J. Price and S. Rosswog, Producing Ultrastrong Mag- netic Fields in Neutron Star Mergers, Science312, 719 (2006), arXiv:astro-ph/0603845 [astro-ph]

    work page arXiv 2006

  3. [3]

    J. M. Lattimer and M. Prakash, The Physics of Neutron Stars, Science304, 536 (2004), arXiv:astro-ph/0405262 [astro-ph]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2004

  4. [4]

    M. Yu, R. N. Manchester, G. Hobbs, S. Johnston, V. M. Kaspi, M. Keith, A. G. Lyne, G. J. Qiao, V. Ravi, J. M. Sarkissian, R. Shannon, and R. X. Xu, Detection of 107 glitches in 36 southern pulsars, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.429, 688 (2013), arXiv:1211.2035 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2013

  5. [5]

    A. Basu, B. Shaw, D. Antonopoulou, M. J. Keith, A. G. Lyne, M. B. Mickaliger, B. W. Stappers, P. Weltevrede, and C. A. Jordan, The Jodrell bank glitch catalogue: 106 new rotational glitches in 70 pulsars, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.510, 4049 (2022), arXiv:2111.06835 [astro- ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2022

  6. [6]

    P. Liu, J. P. Yuan, M. Y. Ge, W. T. Ye, S. Q. Zhou, S. J. Dang, Z. R. Zhou, E. G¨ ugercino˘ glu, Z. H. Tu, P. Wang, A. Li, D. Li, and N. Wang, A multiband study of pul- sar glitches with Fermi-LAT and Parkes, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.537, 1720 (2025), arXiv:2408.15022 [astro- ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2025

  7. [7]

    C. M. Espinoza, A. G. Lyne, B. W. Stap- pers, and M. Kramer, A study of 315 glitches in the rotation of 102 pulsars, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society414, 1679 (2011), https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article- pdf/414/2/1679/3015039/mnras0414-1679.pdf

    2011

  8. [8]

    Ruderman, Neutron Starquakes and Pulsar Periods, Nature (London)223, 597 (1969)

    M. Ruderman, Neutron Starquakes and Pulsar Periods, Nature (London)223, 597 (1969)

    1969

  9. [9]

    Baym and D

    G. Baym and D. Pines, Neutron starquakes and pulsar speedup., Annals of Physics66, 816 (1971)

    1971

  10. [10]

    Ruderman, Neutron Star Crustal Plate Tectonics

    R. Ruderman, Neutron Star Crustal Plate Tectonics. II. Evolution of Radio Pulsar Magnetic Fields, Astrophys. J.382, 576 (1991)

    1991

  11. [11]

    P. W. Anderson and N. Itoh, Pulsar glitches and restless- ness as a hard superfluidity phenomenon, Nature (Lon- don)256, 25 (1975)

    1975

  12. [12]

    Ruderman, Crust-breaking by neutron superfluids and the Vela pulsar glitches., Astrophys

    M. Ruderman, Crust-breaking by neutron superfluids and the Vela pulsar glitches., Astrophys. J.203, 213 (1976)

    1976

  13. [13]

    P. M. Pizzochero, Angular Momentum Transfer in Vela- like Pulsar Glitches, Astro. Phys. J. Lett.743, L20 (2011), arXiv:1105.0156 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2011

  14. [14]

    Andersson, K

    N. Andersson, K. Glampedakis, W. C. G. Ho, and C. M. Espinoza, Pulsar Glitches: The Crust is not Enough, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 241103 (2012), arXiv:1207.0633 [astro-ph.SR]

    work page arXiv 2012

  15. [15]

    Neutron conduction in the inner crust of a neutron star in the framework of the band theory of solids,

    N. Chamel, Publisher’s Note: Neutron conduction in the inner crust of a neutron star in the framework of the band theory of solids [Phys. Rev. C 85, 035801 (2012)], Phys. Rev. C85, 039902 (2012), arXiv:1203.0119 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2012

  16. [16]

    Dodson, D

    R. Dodson, D. Lewis, and P. McCulloch, Two decades of pulsar timing of Vela, Astrophys. Space Sci.308, 585 (2007), arXiv:astro-ph/0612371 [astro-ph]

    work page arXiv 2007

  17. [17]

    Palfreyman, J

    J. Palfreyman, J. M. Dickey, A. Hotan, S. Ellingsen, and W. van Straten, Alteration of the magnetosphere of the Vela pulsar during a glitch, Nature (London)556, 219 (2018)

    2018

  18. [18]

    B. Shaw, A. G. Lyne, B. W. Stappers, P. Weltevrede, C. G. Bassa, A. Y. Lien, M. B. Mickaliger, R. P. Bre- ton, C. A. Jordan, M. J. Keith, and H. A. Krimm, The largest glitch observed in the Crab pulsar, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.478, 3832 (2018), arXiv:1805.05110 [astro- ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2018

  19. [19]

    G¨ ugercino˘ glu, O

    E. G¨ ugercino˘ glu, O. Akbal, M. A. Alpar, D. Antonopoulou, and C. M. Espinoza, Braking in- dex of the frequently glitching PSR J0537−6910, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2506.22936 (2025), arXiv:2506.22936 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2025

  20. [20]

    J. M. Lattimer and M. Prakash, The equation of state of hot, dense matter and neutron stars, Phys. Rep.621, 127 (2016), arXiv:1512.07820 [astro-ph.SR]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2016

  21. [21]

    G. Baym, T. Hatsuda, T. Kojo, P. D. Powell, Y. Song, and T. Takatsuka, From hadrons to quarks in neutron stars: a review, Reports on Progress in Physics81, 056902 (2018), arXiv:1707.04966 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2018

  22. [22]

    Annala, T

    E. Annala, T. Gorda, A. Kurkela, J. N¨ attil¨ a, and A. Vuorinen, Evidence for quark-matter cores in mas- sive neutron stars, Nature Physics16, 907 (2020), arXiv:1903.09121 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2020

  23. [23]

    Kumar, V

    A. Kumar, V. B. Thapa, and M. Sinha, Hybrid stars are compatible with recent astrophysical observations, Phys. Rev. D107, 063024 (2023), arXiv:2303.06387 [astro- ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2023

  24. [24]

    N. K. Glendenning, A crystalline quark-hadron mixed phase in neutron stars., Phys. Rep.264, 143 (1996)

    1996

  25. [25]

    N. K. Glendenning, First-order phase transitions with more than one conserved charge: Consequences for neu- tron stars, Phys. Rev. D46, 1274 (1992)

    1992

  26. [26]

    Ring, Relativistic mean field theory in finite nuclei, Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics37, 193 (1996)

    P. Ring, Relativistic mean field theory in finite nuclei, Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics37, 193 (1996)

    1996

  27. [27]

    N. K. Glendenning,Compact stars: Nuclear physics, par- ticle physics, and general relativity, Astronomy and As- trophysics Library (Springer, 1997)

    1997

  28. [29]

    Typel and H

    S. Typel and H. Wolter, Relativistic mean field calcu- lations with density-dependent meson-nucleon coupling, Nuclear Physics A656, 331 (1999)

    1999

  29. [30]

    Nikˇ si´ c, D

    T. Nikˇ si´ c, D. Vretenar, P. Finelli, and P. Ring, Relativis- tic hartree-bogoliubov model with density-dependent meson-nucleon couplings, Phys. Rev. C66, 024306 (2002)

    2002

  30. [31]

    Hofmann, C

    F. Hofmann, C. M. Keil, and H. Lenske, Application of the density dependent hadron field theory to neutron star matter, Phys. Rev. C64, 025804 (2001)

    2001

  31. [32]

    G. A. Lalazissis, T. Nikˇ si´ c, D. Vretenar, and P. Ring, New relativistic mean-field interaction with density- dependent meson-nucleon couplings, Phys. Rev. C71, 024312 (2005)

    2005

  32. [33]

    Maruyama, S

    T. Maruyama, S. Chiba, H.-J. Schulze, and T. Tatsumi, Hadron-quark mixed phase in hyperon stars, Phys. Rev. D76, 123015 (2007)

    2007

  33. [34]

    S. S. Avancini, D. P. Menezes, M. D. Alloy, J. R. Marinelli, M. M. W. Moraes, and C. Providˆ encia, Warm 10 and cold pasta phase in relativistic mean field theory, Phys. Rev. C78, 015802 (2008)

    2008

  34. [35]

    M. Ju, X. Wu, F. Ji, J. Hu, and H. Shen, Hadron-quark mixed phase in the quark-meson coupling model, Phys. Rev. C103, 025809 (2021)

    2021

  35. [36]

    H. S. Than, E. Khan, and N. Van Giai, Wigner-Seitz cells in neutron star crust with finite range interactions, J. Phys. G38, 025201 (2011), arXiv:1006.2916 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2011

  36. [37]

    Maruyama, T

    T. Maruyama, T. Tatsumi, T. Endo, and S. Chiba, Pasta structures in compact stars, arXiv e-prints , nucl- th/0605075 (2006), arXiv:nucl-th/0605075 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2006

  37. [38]

    C.-J. Xia, T. Maruyama, N. Yasutake, T. Tatsumi, H. Shen, and H. Togashi, Systematic study on the quark- hadron mixed phase in compact stars, Phys. Rev. D102, 023031 (2020)

    2020

  38. [39]

    D. G. Ravenhall, C. J. Pethick, and J. R. Wilson, Struc- ture of matter below nuclear saturation density, Phys. Rev. Lett.50, 2066 (1983)

    2066

  39. [40]

    With electronic communication with authors of [38]

  40. [41]

    Mariani and G

    M. Mariani and G. Lugones, Quark-hadron pasta phase in neutron stars: The role of medium-dependent surface and curvature tensions, Phys. Rev. D109, 063022 (2024)

    2024

  41. [42]

    Klahn and T

    T. Kl¨ ahn and T. Fischer, Vector Interaction Enhanced Bag Model for Astrophysical Applications, Astrophys. J. 810, 134 (2015), arXiv:1503.07442 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2015

  42. [43]

    L. L. Lopes, C. Biesdorf, and D. P. Menezes, Modified MIT bag Models—part I: Thermodynamic consistency, stability windows and symmetry group, Phys. Scr.96, 065303 (2021), arXiv:2005.13136 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  43. [44]

    Kumar, V

    A. Kumar, V. B. Thapa, and M. Sinha, Compact star merger events with stars composed of interacting strange quark matter, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.513, 3788 (2022), arXiv:2204.11034 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2022

  44. [45]

    M. Ju, J. Hu, and H. Shen, Hadron-quark Pasta Phase in Massive Neutron Stars, Astrophys. J.923, 250 (2021), arXiv:2111.08909 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  45. [46]

    T. E. Rileyet al., AN ICERView of PSR J0030+0451: Millisecond Pulsar Parameter Estimation, Astrophys. J. Lett.887, L21 (2019), arXiv:1912.05702 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2019

  46. [47]

    T. E. Rileyet al., A NICER View of the Massive Pul- sar PSR J0740+6620 Informed by Radio Timing and XMM-Newton Spectroscopy, Astrophys. J. Lett.918, L27 (2021), arXiv:2105.06980 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2021

  47. [48]

    M. C. Milleret al., PSR J0030+0451 Mass and Radius fromN ICERData and Implications for the Properties of Neutron Star Matter, Astrophys. J. Lett.887, L24 (2019), arXiv:1912.05705 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2019

  48. [49]

    M. C. Milleret al., The Radius of PSR J0740+6620 from NICER and XMM-Newton Data, Astrophys. J. Lett. 918, L28 (2021), arXiv:2105.06979 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2021

  49. [50]

    R. W. Romani, D. Kandel, A. V. Filippenko, T. G. Brink, and W. Zheng, PSR J0952−0607: The Fastest and Heav- iest Known Galactic Neutron Star, Astrophys. J. Lett. 934, L17 (2022), arXiv:2207.05124 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2022

  50. [51]

    Takatsuka and R

    T. Takatsuka and R. Tamagaki, Superfluid state in neu- tron star matter. ii: Properties of anisotropic energy gap of 3 p 2 pairing, Progress of Theoretical Physics46, 114 (1971)

    1971

  51. [52]

    Sedrakian and J

    A. Sedrakian and J. W. Clark, Superfluidity in nuclear systems and neutron stars, Eur. Phys. J. A55, 167 (2019), arXiv:1802.00017 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2019

  52. [53]

    Seveso, P

    S. Seveso, P. M. Pizzochero, F. Grill, and B. Haskell, Mesoscopic pinning forces in neutron star crusts, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society455, 3952 (2016)

    2016

  53. [54]

    Hirasawa and N

    M. Hirasawa and N. Shibazaki, Vortex Configurations, Oscillations and Pinning in Neutron Star Crusts, inNeu- tron Stars, Pulsars, and Supernova Remnants, edited by W. Becker, H. Lesch, and J. Tr¨ umper (2002) p. 112, arXiv:astro-ph/0209025 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2002

  54. [55]

    C. A. van Eysden and B. Link, Hydrodynamic stabil- ity analysis of the neutron star core, The Astrophysical Journal865, 60 (2018)

    2018

  55. [56]

    Yasutake, R

    N. Yasutake, R. Lastowiecki, S. Beni´ c, D. Blaschke, T. Maruyama, and T. Tatsumi, Finite-size effects at the hadron-quark transition and heavy hybrid stars, Phys. Rev. C89, 065803 (2014)

    2014

  56. [57]

    Seveso, P

    S. Seveso, P. M. Pizzochero, and B. Haskell, The effect of realistic equations of state and general relativity on the ’snowplough’ model for pulsar glitches, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.427, 1089 (2012), arXiv:1205.6647 [astro- ph.SR]

    work page arXiv 2012

  57. [58]

    Antonelli, A

    M. Antonelli, A. Montoli, and P. M. Pizzochero, Effects of general relativity on glitch amplitudes and pulsar mass upper bounds, Monthly No- tices of the Royal Astronomical Society475, 5403 (2018), https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article- pdf/475/4/5403/24142572/sty130.pdf

    2018

  58. [59]

    Mariani and G

    M. Mariani and G. Lugones, Quark-hadron pasta phase in neutron stars: The role of medium-dependent surface and curvature tensions, Phys. Rev. D109, 063022 (2024), arXiv:2308.13973 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  59. [60]

    Hoffberg, A

    M. Hoffberg, A. Glassgold, R. Richardson, and M. Rud- erman, Anisotropic superfluidity in neutron star matter, Physical Review Letters24, 775 (1970)

    1970

  60. [61]

    Takatsuka, Energy Gap in Neutron-Star Mat- ter, Progress of Theoretical Physics48, 1517 (1972), https://academic.oup.com/ptp/article- pdf/48/5/1517/5328994/48-5-1517.pdf

    T. Takatsuka, Energy Gap in Neutron-Star Mat- ter, Progress of Theoretical Physics48, 1517 (1972), https://academic.oup.com/ptp/article- pdf/48/5/1517/5328994/48-5-1517.pdf

    1972

  61. [62]

    Ramanan and M

    S. Ramanan and M. Urban, Pairing in pure neutron mat- ter, Eur. Phys. J. ST230, 567 (2021), arXiv:2010.09632 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  62. [63]

    Arumugam and S

    S. Arumugam and S. Desai, Classification of pulsar glitch amplitudes using extreme deconvolution, Journal of High Energy Astrophysics37, 46 (2023)

    2023

  63. [64]

    Espinoza, D

    C. Espinoza, D. Antonopoulou, R. Dodson, M. Stepanova, and A. Scherer, Small glitches and other rotational irregularities of the vela pulsar, Astronomy & Astrophysics647, A25 (2021)

    2021

  64. [65]

    B. C. Barrois, Superconducting quark matter, Nuclear Physics B129, 390 (1977)

    1977

  65. [66]

    M. G. Alford, A. Schmitt, K. Rajagopal, and T. Sch¨ afer, Color superconductivity in dense quark matter, Rev. Mod. Phys.80, 1455 (2008)

    2008

  66. [67]

    Iida and G

    K. Iida and G. Baym, Superfluid phases of quark matter: Ginzburg-landau theory and color neutrality, Phys. Rev. D63, 074018 (2001)

    2001

  67. [68]

    Iida and G

    K. Iida and G. Baym, Superfluid phases of quark matter. iii. supercurrents and vortices, Phys. Rev. D66, 014015 (2002)

    2002

  68. [69]

    J. C. T. De Oliveira, S. B. Duarte, H. Rodrigues, M. Chi- apparini, and M. Kyotoku, Effects of Delta-baryon inter- action strength on neutron stars properties, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D16, 175 (2007)

    2007

  69. [70]

    Drago, A

    A. Drago, A. Lavagno, G. Pagliara, and D. Pigato, Early appearance of ∆ isobars in neutron stars, Phys. Rev. C 90, 065809 (2014). 11

    2014

  70. [71]

    J. J. Li, A. Sedrakian, and F. Weber, Competition between delta isobars and hyperons and properties of compact stars, Physics Letters B783, 234 (2018), arXiv:1803.03661 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2018

  71. [72]

    Parmar, V

    V. Parmar, V. B. Thapa, M. Sinha, and I. Bombaci, Ex- ploring the ∆-resonance in neutron stars: Implications from astrophysical and nuclear observations, Phys. Rev. D112, 023016 (2025), arXiv:2503.07256 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2025

  72. [73]

    Malfatti, M

    G. Malfatti, M. G. Orsaria, I. F. Ranea-Sandoval, G. A. Contrera, and F. Weber, Delta baryons and diquark for- mation in the cores of neutron stars, Phys. Rev. D102, 063008 (2020), arXiv:2008.06459 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2020