pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.03018 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-04 · 🌀 gr-qc · hep-th

Recognition: 4 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Gravitational electric-magnetic duality at the light ring and quasinormal mode isospectrality in effective field theories

Ibrahima Bah , Emanuele Berti , Valerio De Luca , Bogdan Ganchev , David Pere\~niguez
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 17:44 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc hep-th
keywords quasinormal modesisospectralityelectric-magnetic dualitylight ringPenrose limithigher-derivative correctionseffective field theoriesblack hole perturbations
0
0 comments X

The pith

Gravitational electric-magnetic duality at the light ring enforces isospectrality of quasinormal modes even after certain higher-derivative corrections to general relativity.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

In general relativity, even-parity and odd-parity quasinormal modes of black holes share identical frequencies and damping times, a property called isospectrality. Higher-derivative corrections to Einstein gravity usually break this degeneracy, yet some specific operators leave it intact in the high-frequency eikonal regime. The paper traces the preservation to a gravitational version of electric-magnetic duality that acts on metric perturbations in the plane-wave spacetimes obtained by taking the Penrose limit at the light ring. Demanding that this duality continue to hold after the corrections are added imposes linear constraints on the operator coefficients; those constraints are exactly the ones that keep the spectra degenerate. The authors therefore identify the duality itself as the mechanism that protects isospectrality whenever the corrections respect it.

Core claim

In general relativity, dynamical metric fluctuations on the plane-wave backgrounds that arise from the light-ring Penrose limit admit a gravitational analog of electric-magnetic duality. This duality interchanges the even- and odd-parity sectors and thereby forces their quasinormal spectra to coincide. When higher-derivative operators are added, the requirement that the same duality remain a symmetry of the linearized equations constrains the allowed couplings; the constrained theories are precisely those that preserve isospectrality in the eikonal limit. The authors conclude that light-ring duality is the organizing principle behind eikonal isospectrality and conjecture that the same holds,

What carries the argument

The gravitational electric-magnetic duality acting on metric fluctuations in the plane-wave spacetimes obtained from the light-ring Penrose limit.

If this is right

  • Isospectrality survives in the eikonal limit precisely when the higher-derivative corrections are invariant under the light-ring duality.
  • The allowed operators are linearly constrained; the surviving combinations automatically keep even- and odd-parity frequencies identical.
  • The same organizing principle is conjectured to apply to any other duality-invariant correction beyond the class explicitly studied.
  • The duality provides a direct diagnostic for whether a given effective-field-theory term will preserve or break isospectrality without solving the full perturbation equations.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The result offers a symmetry-based classification of which beyond-GR operators are safe for isospectrality, potentially simplifying model-building in modified gravity.
  • One could test the conjecture by checking whether known duality-invariant terms in Einstein-scalar-Gauss-Bonnet or dynamical Chern-Simons gravity preserve the degeneracy in the eikonal limit.
  • If the duality continues to protect isospectrality at higher orders, it may also constrain the form of non-perturbative corrections that could appear in string-inspired models.

Load-bearing premise

The plane-wave spacetimes extracted from the light-ring Penrose limit faithfully encode the essential dynamics of eikonal quasinormal modes, and the duality can be imposed on the higher-derivative operators without further restrictions that would invalidate the coupling constraints.

What would settle it

An explicit computation of eikonal quasinormal modes for a higher-derivative correction that preserves the light-ring duality yet produces non-degenerate even- and odd-parity spectra.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.03018 by Bogdan Ganchev, David Pere\~niguez, Emanuele Berti, Ibrahima Bah, Valerio De Luca.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Relation between black hole and Penrose-limit pertur view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Black hole perturbations are characterized by a superposition of damped exponentials known as quasinormal modes. In general relativity, the spectra of parity-even and parity-odd quasinormal modes coincide -- a property known as isospectrality, which is typically broken by corrections beyond general relativity. Recently, certain higher-derivative operators were shown to preserve isospectrality in the high-frequency (eikonal) regime. Motivated by the relation between the light ring Penrose limit and the eikonal limit, we study isospectrality in a class of plane-wave spacetimes. In general relativity, we show that dynamical metric fluctuations on these backgrounds admit a gravitational analog of electric-magnetic duality, which enforces isospectrality. Requiring this duality to persist in the presence of higher-derivative corrections constrains the couplings so that isospectrality is preserved. We conclude that gravitational electric-magnetic duality at the light ring is the organizing principle behind isospectrality in the eikonal limit, and we conjecture that this remains true for other duality-invariant corrections to general relativity.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that gravitational electric-magnetic duality holds for dynamical metric fluctuations on plane-wave spacetimes obtained from the light-ring Penrose limit in general relativity, thereby enforcing isospectrality between parity-even and parity-odd quasinormal modes in the eikonal limit. Requiring the duality to persist under higher-derivative corrections then constrains the allowed EFT couplings so that isospectrality is preserved. The authors conclude that this duality at the light ring is the organizing principle for eikonal isospectrality and conjecture that the result extends to other duality-invariant corrections to GR.

Significance. If the central derivations hold, the work supplies a symmetry-based explanation for the preservation of eikonal isospectrality under selected higher-derivative operators, offering a practical criterion for constructing EFTs compatible with GR-like spectral properties. The use of the Penrose limit to isolate the relevant dynamics is a technically interesting link between local plane-wave geometry and global black-hole perturbation spectra.

major comments (2)
  1. [The discussion of the Penrose limit and its relation to the eikonal regime] The reduction step from the light-ring Penrose limit to eikonal QNM isospectrality assumes that local duality on the resulting plane-wave backgrounds captures all relevant dynamics without residual curvature or horizon contributions that could split the spectra. This assumption is load-bearing for the claim that duality enforces isospectrality in the original geometry, yet the manuscript provides no explicit matching or global consistency argument showing that the local plane-wave equations suffice.
  2. [The section deriving EFT constraints from persistence of duality] When extending the duality to higher-derivative operators, the paper imposes the duality condition directly on the plane-wave fluctuations to constrain couplings. It is not shown that this procedure is equivalent to imposing duality on the full linearized perturbation equations around the black-hole background; additional terms generated by the reduction could relax or invalidate the reported constraints on the EFT coefficients.
minor comments (2)
  1. Notation for the electric and magnetic parts of the Weyl tensor (or their plane-wave analogs) should be introduced with an explicit definition before being used in the duality transformation.
  2. The abstract states that certain operators 'preserve isospectrality' but does not list the specific operators or the dimension at which they appear; adding this information would improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the positive assessment of its significance. We address the two major comments point by point below, providing clarifications on the assumptions and indicating the revisions we will make to strengthen the presentation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [The discussion of the Penrose limit and its relation to the eikonal regime] The reduction step from the light-ring Penrose limit to eikonal QNM isospectrality assumes that local duality on the resulting plane-wave backgrounds captures all relevant dynamics without residual curvature or horizon contributions that could split the spectra. This assumption is load-bearing for the claim that duality enforces isospectrality in the original geometry, yet the manuscript provides no explicit matching or global consistency argument showing that the local plane-wave equations suffice.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit discussion of this connection would strengthen the manuscript. The Penrose limit is a standard tool to extract the eikonal limit of quasinormal modes, as it focuses on the high-frequency, short-wavelength regime near the unstable photon orbit (light ring). In this limit, the wave equations reduce to those on a plane-wave spacetime, and the duality symmetry we identify acts on these reduced equations to enforce the degeneracy between even and odd modes. Residual curvature effects from the global geometry are subleading in the eikonal expansion and do not affect the leading-order isospectrality. To address the referee's concern, we will add a dedicated paragraph in the introduction or a new subsection in Section 2 explaining this reduction and citing relevant literature on the validity of the Penrose limit for eikonal QNMs. This will include a brief argument why horizon contributions are irrelevant in the eikonal limit. We believe this clarification will resolve the issue without requiring major changes to the derivations. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [The section deriving EFT constraints from persistence of duality] When extending the duality to higher-derivative operators, the paper imposes the duality condition directly on the plane-wave fluctuations to constrain couplings. It is not shown that this procedure is equivalent to imposing duality on the full linearized perturbation equations around the black-hole background; additional terms generated by the reduction could relax or invalidate the reported constraints on the EFT coefficients.

    Authors: This is a valid point regarding the order of limits and reductions. Our approach is motivated by the fact that the eikonal limit corresponds precisely to the dynamics on the Penrose-limit plane waves, so requiring duality invariance there directly ensures that the higher-derivative terms do not break isospectrality at leading eikonal order. Since the higher-derivative operators are local, their contribution in the reduced geometry captures the leading effect. However, we concede that a rigorous demonstration that no additional terms arise from commuting the duality condition with the Penrose limit would be desirable. We will revise the relevant section (likely Section 4) to include a discussion of this point, arguing that because the Penrose limit is a local coordinate transformation near the light ring, and the EFT corrections are diffeomorphism-invariant, the constraints remain valid for the eikonal spectra. We will also note that this is consistent with numerical checks in the literature for specific EFTs. If further verification is needed, we can consider expanding the full equations in future work, but for the current scope, this provides the organizing principle as claimed. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivation derives duality explicitly in GR then applies it to constrain EFT terms

full rationale

The paper first constructs gravitational electric-magnetic duality on the plane-wave backgrounds obtained from the light-ring Penrose limit within general relativity and shows that this duality enforces isospectrality of the metric fluctuations. It then requires the same duality to hold after adding higher-derivative operators, thereby obtaining constraints on the EFT couplings that preserve isospectrality. This chain does not reduce any claimed prediction to a fitted input by construction, does not rely on self-citations for its central steps, and does not smuggle an ansatz or rename a known result. The Penrose-limit assumption is an explicit modeling choice whose validity is independent of the duality derivation itself. No load-bearing step collapses to a tautology or to prior work by the same authors.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard assumptions of general relativity and effective field theory plus the technical step of reducing the light-ring dynamics to plane-wave backgrounds; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption General relativity governs the background geometry and linear perturbations on the plane-wave spacetimes
    Invoked to derive the gravitational electric-magnetic duality in the GR limit.
  • domain assumption Higher-derivative operators appear in the effective field theory expansion around GR
    Used to discuss corrections that may or may not preserve the duality.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5505 in / 1406 out tokens · 65699 ms · 2026-05-08T17:44:31.143176+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

89 extracted references · 69 canonical work pages · 8 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Black hole spectroscopy: from theory to experiment

    E. Berti, V. Cardoso, G. Carullo,et al., Black hole spectroscopy: from theory to experiment, (2025), arXiv:2505.23895 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025

  2. [2]

    C. V. Vishveshwara, Scattering of Gravitational Radiation by a Schwarzschild Black-hole, Nature227, 936 (1970)

    1970

  3. [3]

    W. H. Press, Long Wave Trains of Gravitational Waves from a Vibrating Black Hole, Astrophys. J. Lett.170, L105 (1971)

    1971

  4. [4]

    S. A. Teukolsky, Perturbations of a rotating black hole. 1. Fundamental equations for gravitational electromagnetic and neutrino field perturbations, Astrophys. J.185, 635 (1973)

    1973

  5. [5]

    Chandrasekhar and S

    S. Chandrasekhar and S. L. Detweiler, The quasi-normal modes of the Schwarzschild black hole, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A344, 441 (1975)

    1975

  6. [6]

    K. D. Kokkotas and B. G. Schmidt, Quasinormal modes of stars and black holes, Living Rev. Rel.2, 2 (1999), arXiv:gr-qc/9909058

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 1999

  7. [7]

    Quasinormal modes of black holes and black branes

    E. Berti, V. Cardoso, and A. O. Starinets, Quasinormal modes of black holes and black branes, Class. Quant. Grav. 26, 163001 (2009), arXiv:0905.2975 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2009

  8. [8]

    Dreyer, B

    O. Dreyer, B. J. Kelly, B. Krishnan, L. S. Finn, D. Gar- rison, and R. Lopez-Aleman, Black hole spectroscopy: Testing general relativity through gravitational wave ob- servations, Class. Quant. Grav.21, 787 (2004), arXiv:gr- qc/0309007

    work page arXiv 2004

  9. [9]

    On gravitational-wave spectroscopy of massive black holes with the space interferometer LISA

    E. Berti, V. Cardoso, and C. M. Will, On gravitational- wave spectroscopy of massive black holes with the space interferometer LISA, Phys. Rev. D73, 064030 (2006), arXiv:gr-qc/0512160

    work page Pith review arXiv 2006

  10. [10]

    Bayesian model selection for testing the no-hair theorem with black hole ringdowns

    S. Gossan, J. Veitch, and B. S. Sathyaprakash, Bayesian model selection for testing the no-hair theorem with black hole ringdowns, Phys. Rev. D85, 124056 (2012), arXiv:1111.5819 [gr-qc]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2012

  11. [11]

    Testing General Relativity with Present and Future Astrophysical Observations

    E. Bertiet al., Testing General Relativity with Present and Future Astrophysical Observations, Class. Quant. Grav.32, 243001 (2015), arXiv:1501.07274 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2015

  12. [12]

    Berti, K

    E. Berti, K. Yagi, H. Yang, and N. Yunes, Extreme Grav- ity Tests with Gravitational Waves from Compact Binary Coalescences: (II) Ringdown, Gen. Rel. Grav.50, 49 (2018), arXiv:1801.03587 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2018

  13. [13]

    Franchini and S

    N. Franchini and S. H. Völkel, Testing General Rel- ativity with Black Hole Quasi-normal Modes (2024) arXiv:2305.01696 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  14. [14]

    A. G. Abacet al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA), GWTC-4.0: Tests of General Relativity. I. Overview and General Tests, (2026), arXiv:2603.19019 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2026

  15. [15]

    A. G. Abacet al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA), GWTC-4.0: Tests of General Relativity. III. Tests of the Remnants, (2026), arXiv:2603.19021 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2026

  16. [16]

    Regge and J

    T. Regge and J. A. Wheeler, Stability of a Schwarzschild singularity, Phys. Rev.108, 1063 (1957)

    1957

  17. [17]

    F. J. Zerilli, Effective potential for even parity Regge- Wheeler gravitational perturbation equations, Phys. Rev. Lett.24, 737 (1970)

    1970

  18. [18]

    Chandrasekhar, On the equations governing the pertur- bations of the Schwarzschild black hole, Proc

    S. Chandrasekhar, On the equations governing the pertur- bations of the Schwarzschild black hole, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A343, 289 (1975)

    1975

  19. [19]

    Kallosh, J

    R. Kallosh, J. Rahmfeld, and W. K. Wong, One loop supergravity corrections to the black hole entropy and residual supersymmetry, Phys. Rev. D57, 1063 (1998), arXiv:hep-th/9706048

    work page arXiv 1998

  20. [20]

    Glampedakis, A

    K. Glampedakis, A. D. Johnson, and D. Kennefick, Dar- boux transformation in black hole perturbation theory, Phys. Rev. D96, 024036 (2017), arXiv:1702.06459 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2017

  21. [21]

    Lenzi and C

    M. Lenzi and C. F. Sopuerta, Darboux covariance: A hidden symmetry of perturbed Schwarzschild black holes, Phys. Rev. D104, 124068 (2021), arXiv:2109.00503 [gr- qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  22. [22]

    Lenzi and C

    M. Lenzi and C. F. Sopuerta, Master functions and equations for perturbations of vacuum spherically sym- metric spacetimes, Phys. Rev. D104, 084053 (2021), arXiv:2108.08668 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  23. [23]

    Lenzi and C

    M. Lenzi and C. F. Sopuerta, Black hole greybody factors from Korteweg–de Vries integrals: Theory, Phys. Rev. D 107, 044010 (2023), arXiv:2212.03732 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  24. [24]

    Lenzi and C

    M. Lenzi and C. F. Sopuerta, Black hole greybody factors from Korteweg–de Vries integrals: Computation, Phys. 7 Rev. D107, 084039 (2023), arXiv:2301.01096 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  25. [25]

    A. R. Solomon, Off-Shell Duality Invariance of Schwarzschild Perturbation Theory, Particles6, 943 (2023), arXiv:2310.04502 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  26. [26]

    D. A. Nichols, A. Zimmerman, Y. Chen, G. Lovelace, K. D. Matthews, R. Owen, F. Zhang, and K. S. Thorne, Visualizing Spacetime Curvature via Frame-Drag Vor- texes and Tidal Tendexes III. Quasinormal Pulsations of Schwarzschild and Kerr Black Holes, Phys. Rev. D86, 104028 (2012), arXiv:1208.3038 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2012

  27. [27]

    N.Franchini,Slowrotationblackholeperturbationtheory, Phys. Rev. D108, 044079 (2023), arXiv:2305.19313 [gr- qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  28. [28]

    G. R. Mukkamala and D. Pereñiguez, Decoupled gravi- tational wave equations in spherical symmetry from cur- vature wave equations, JCAP01, 122, arXiv:2408.13557 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv

  29. [29]

    Cardoso, M

    V. Cardoso, M. Kimura, A. Maselli, E. Berti, C. F. B. Macedo, and R. McManus, Parametrized black hole quasinormal ringdown: Decoupled equations for non- rotating black holes, Phys. Rev. D99, 104077 (2019), arXiv:1901.01265 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2019

  30. [30]

    McManus, E

    R. McManus, E. Berti, C. F. B. Macedo, M. Kimura, A. Maselli, and V. Cardoso, Parametrized black hole quasi- normal ringdown. II. Coupled equations and quadratic corrections for nonrotating black holes, Phys. Rev. D100, 044061 (2019), arXiv:1906.05155 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2019

  31. [31]

    P. A. Cano, K. Fransen, T. Hertog, and S. Maenaut, Gravitational ringing of rotating black holes in higher- derivative gravity, Phys. Rev. D105, 024064 (2022), arXiv:2110.11378 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  32. [32]

    P. A. Cano, K. Fransen, T. Hertog, and S. Maenaut, Quasinormal modes of rotating black holes in higher- derivative gravity, Phys. Rev. D108, 124032 (2023), arXiv:2307.07431 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  33. [33]

    H. O. Silva, G. Tambalo, K. Glampedakis, K. Yagi, and J. Steinhoff, Quasinormal modes and their excitation be- yond general relativity, Phys. Rev. D110, 024042 (2024), arXiv:2404.11110 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  34. [34]

    P. A. Cano, L. Capuano, N. Franchini, S. Maenaut, and S. H. Völkel, Higher-derivative corrections to the Kerr quasinormal mode spectrum, Phys. Rev. D110, 124057 (2024), arXiv:2409.04517 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  35. [35]

    H. O. Silva, G. Tambalo, K. Glampedakis, and K. Yagi, Quasinormal modes and their excitation beyond general relativity. II. Isospectrality loss in gravitational waveforms, Phys. Rev. D113, 084012 (2026), arXiv:2601.13411 [gr- qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  36. [36]

    P. A. Cano and M. David, Isospectrality in Effective Field Theory Extensions of General Relativity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 191401 (2025), arXiv:2407.12080 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  37. [37]

    P.A.Cano, M.David,andG.vanderVelde,Eikonalquasi- normal modes of highly-spinning black holes in higher- curvature gravity: a window into extremality, (2025), arXiv:2509.08664 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  38. [38]

    M. K. Gaillard and B. Zumino, Duality Rotations for Interacting Fields, Nucl. Phys. B193, 221 (1981)

    1981

  39. [39]

    G. W. Gibbons and D. A. Rasheed, Electric - magnetic duality rotations in nonlinear electrodynamics, Nucl. Phys. B454, 185 (1995), arXiv:hep-th/9506035

    work page Pith review arXiv 1995

  40. [40]

    Duality in Gauge Theory, Gravity and String Theory,

    U. Kol and S.-T. Yau, Duality in Gauge Theory, Gravity and String Theory, (2023), arXiv:2311.07934 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  41. [41]

    Penrose, A Spinor approach to general relativity, An- nals Phys.10, 171 (1960)

    R. Penrose, A Spinor approach to general relativity, An- nals Phys.10, 171 (1960)

    1960

  42. [42]

    J. A. Nieto, S duality for linearized gravity, Phys. Lett. A262, 274 (1999), arXiv:hep-th/9910049

    work page arXiv 1999

  43. [43]

    C. M. Hull, Duality in gravity and higher spin gauge fields, JHEP09, 027, arXiv:hep-th/0107149

    work page arXiv

  44. [44]

    Duality in linearized gravity,

    M. Henneaux and C. Teitelboim, Duality in linearized gravity, Phys. Rev. D71, 024018 (2005), arXiv:gr- qc/0408101

    work page arXiv 2005

  45. [45]

    Free spin 2 duality invariance cannot be extended to GR,

    S. Deser and D. Seminara, Free spin 2 duality invariance cannot be extended to GR, Phys. Rev. D71, 081502 (2005), arXiv:hep-th/0503030

    work page arXiv 2005

  46. [46]

    C. W. Bunster, S. Cnockaert, M. Henneaux, and R. Por- tugues, Monopoles for gravitation and for higher spin fields, Phys. Rev. D73, 105014 (2006), arXiv:hep- th/0601222

    work page arXiv 2006

  47. [47]

    Gravitational duality and rotating solutions,

    R. Argurio and F. Dehouck, Gravitational duality and rotating solutions, Phys. Rev. D81, 064010 (2010), arXiv:0909.0542 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2010

  48. [48]

    Manifest spin 2 dual- ity with electric and magnetic sources,

    G. Barnich and C. Troessaert, Manifest spin 2 dual- ity with electric and magnetic sources, JHEP01, 030, arXiv:0812.0552 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  49. [49]

    Nonlocality and gravitoelectro- magnetic duality,

    J. Boos and I. Kolář, Nonlocality and gravitoelectro- magnetic duality, Phys. Rev. D104, 024018 (2021), arXiv:2103.10555 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  50. [50]

    No U(1) ‘electric-magnetic’ duality in Ein- stein gravity,

    R. Monteiro, No U(1) ‘electric-magnetic’ duality in Ein- stein gravity, JHEP04, 093, arXiv:2312.02351 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  51. [51]

    del Rio, J

    A. del Rio, J. Olmedo, and A. Torres Manso, Dual- ity symmetry and anomaly for gravitational waves in curved spacetimes, Phys. Rev. D112, 085023 (2025), arXiv:2507.22588 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  52. [52]

    vibrations

    C. J. Goebel, Comments on the “vibrations” of a Black Hole., Astrophys. J. Lett.172, L95 (1972)

    1972

  53. [53]

    Ferrari and B

    V. Ferrari and B. Mashhoon, New approach to the quasi- normal modes of a black hole, Phys. Rev. D30, 295 (1984)

    1984

  54. [54]

    Mashhoon, Stability of charged rotating black holes in the eikonal approximation, Phys

    B. Mashhoon, Stability of charged rotating black holes in the eikonal approximation, Phys. Rev. D31, 290 (1985)

    1985

  55. [55]

    and Kokkotas, K

    E. Berti and K. D. Kokkotas, Quasinormal modes of Kerr-Newman black holes: Coupling of electromagnetic and gravitational perturbations, Phys. Rev. D71, 124008 (2005), arXiv:gr-qc/0502065

    work page arXiv 2005

  56. [56]

    Geodesic stability, Lyapunov exponents and quasinormal modes

    V. Cardoso, A. S. Miranda, E. Berti, H. Witek, and V. T. Zanchin, Geodesic stability, Lyapunov exponents and quasinormal modes, Phys. Rev. D79, 064016 (2009), arXiv:0812.1806 [hep-th]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2009

  57. [57]

    S. R. Dolan, The Quasinormal Mode Spectrum of a Kerr Black Hole in the Eikonal Limit, Phys. Rev. D82, 104003 (2010), arXiv:1007.5097 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2010

  58. [58]

    Penrose, Any space-time has a plane wave as a limit, inDifferential Geometry and Relativity: A Volume in Honour of André Lichnerowicz on His 60th Birthday, edited by M

    R. Penrose, Any space-time has a plane wave as a limit, inDifferential Geometry and Relativity: A Volume in Honour of André Lichnerowicz on His 60th Birthday, edited by M. Cahen and M. Flato (Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 1976) pp. 271–275

    1976

  59. [59]

    Fransen, Quasinormal modes from Penrose limits, Class

    K. Fransen, Quasinormal modes from Penrose limits, Class. Quant. Grav.40, 205004 (2023), arXiv:2301.06999 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  60. [60]

    Kapec and A

    D. Kapec and A. Sheta, pp-waves and the hidden sym- metries of black hole quasinormal modes, Class. Quant. Grav.42, 155002 (2025), arXiv:2412.08551 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  61. [61]

    Fransen, D

    K. Fransen, D. Pereñiguez, and J. Redondo-Yuste, Pertur- bations of plane waves and quadratic quasinormal modes on the lightring, JHEP12, 148, arXiv:2509.03598 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv

  62. [62]

    H. W. Brinkmann, Einstein spaces which are mapped conformally on each other, Math. Ann.94, 119 (1925)

    1925

  63. [63]

    Kehagias, D

    A. Kehagias, D. Perrone, and A. Riotto, Non-linear Quasi- 8 Normal Modes of the Schwarzschild Black Hole from the Penrose Limit, (2025), arXiv:2503.09350 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  64. [64]

    Perrone, A

    D. Perrone, A. Kehagias, and A. Riotto, Nonlinearities in Kerr black hole ringdown from the Penrose limit, JCAP 10, 024, arXiv:2507.01919 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv

  65. [65]

    R. P. Geroch, A. Held, and R. Penrose, A space-time calculus based on pairs of null directions, J. Math. Phys. 14, 874 (1973)

    1973

  66. [66]

    J. M. Stewart and M. Walker, Perturbations of spacetimes in general relativity, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A341, 49 (1974)

    1974

  67. [67]

    S. R. Green, S. Hollands, L. Sberna, V. Toomani, and P. Zimmerman, Conserved currents for a Kerr black hole and orthogonality of quasinormal modes, Phys. Rev. D 107, 064030 (2023), arXiv:2210.15935 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  68. [68]

    Aksteiner and L

    S. Aksteiner and L. Andersson, Linearized gravity and gauge conditions, Class. Quant. Grav.28, 065001 (2011), arXiv:1009.5647 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2011

  69. [69]

    Aksteiner, L

    S. Aksteiner, L. Andersson, and T. Bäckdahl, New iden- tities for linearized gravity on the Kerr spacetime, Phys. Rev. D99, 044043 (2019), arXiv:1601.06084 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2019

  70. [70]

    M. G. Calkin, An Invariance Property of the Free Elec- tromagnetic Field, American Journal of Physics33, 958 (1965)

    1965

  71. [71]

    Ananth, L

    S. Ananth, L. Brink, R. Heise, and H. G. Svendsen, The N=8 Supergravity Hamiltonian as a Quadratic Form, Nucl. Phys. B753, 195 (2006), arXiv:hep-th/0607019

    work page arXiv 2006

  72. [72]

    J. H. Schwarz, An SL(2,Z) multiplet of type IIB su- perstrings, Phys. Lett. B360, 13 (1995), [Erratum: Phys.Lett.B 364, 252 (1995)], arXiv:hep-th/9508143

    work page Pith review arXiv 1995

  73. [73]

    R. M. Wald, Construction of Solutions of Gravitational, Electromagnetic, Or Other Perturbation Equations from Solutions of Decoupled Equations, Phys. Rev. Lett.41, 203 (1978)

    1978

  74. [74]

    L. S. Kegeles and J. M. Cohen, Constructive procedure for perturbations of spacetimes, Phys. Rev. D19, 1641 (1979)

    1979

  75. [75]

    Hadar, D

    S. Hadar, D. Kapec, A. Lupsasca, and A. Strominger, Holography of the photon ring, Class. Quant. Grav.39, 215001 (2022), arXiv:2205.05064 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  76. [76]

    Infinite-dimensional symmetries in plane wave spacetimes

    E. Despontin, S. Detournay, and D. Fontaine, Infinite- dimensional symmetries in plane wave spacetimes 10.1103/2q94-5crl (2025), arXiv:2508.12760 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/2q94-5crl 2025

  77. [77]

    D. Li, A. Hussain, P. Wagle, Y. Chen, N. Yunes, and A. Zimmerman, Isospectrality breaking in the Teukolsky formalism, Phys. Rev. D109, 104026 (2024), arXiv:2310.06033 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  78. [78]

    An effective formalism for testing extensions to General Relativity with gravitational waves

    S. Endlich, V. Gorbenko, J. Huang, and L. Senatore, An effective formalism for testing extensions to Gen- eral Relativity with gravitational waves, JHEP09, 122, arXiv:1704.01590 [gr-qc]

    work page Pith review arXiv

  79. [79]

    P. A. Cano and A. Ruipérez, Leading higher-derivative corrections to Kerr geometry, JHEP05, 189, [Erratum: JHEP 03, 187 (2020)], arXiv:1901.01315 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

  80. [80]

    Gruzinov and M

    A. Gruzinov and M. Kleban, Causality Constrains Higher Curvature Corrections to Gravity, Class. Quant. Grav. 24, 3521 (2007), arXiv:hep-th/0612015

    work page arXiv 2007

Showing first 80 references.