pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.04868 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-06 · 💻 cs.HC

Not All Scaffolds Are Equal: How Initiation Mode Determines EMME Effectiveness in Debugging

Anahita Golrang , Kshitij Sharma , Halszka Jarodzka , Senne Van Hoecke This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 16:13 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.HC
keywords EMMEscaffoldingdebuggingeye trackingadaptive learningpupillary activityinitiation modenovice programmers
0
0 comments X

The pith

Human-initiated EMME scaffolds outperform automated triggers based on pupillary activity in novice debugging tasks.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper examines whether the timing and control over when Eye Movement Modeling Examples appear shape their value as support for beginners fixing code errors. In tests with 120 students across four conditions, every EMME version raised performance above the unsupported baseline, yet versions started by a teacher or by the learner themselves produced stronger results and smoother use of the material than versions started automatically when low pupil activity signaled low effort. The automated version often arrived at awkward moments that interrupted work. EMME also removed the usual performance edge held by students who already knew some programming. The findings matter because many adaptive tools now try to use body signals to decide when to step in automatically.

Core claim

A between-subjects study assigned 120 computer science undergraduates to teacher-initiated, learner-initiated, automated, or no-EMME conditions while they debugged ten Python tasks. All EMME groups outperformed the control, but human-mediated initiation produced higher scores and more integrative engagement with the examples; automated triggering tied to sustained low pupillary activity linked to disruptive patterns. EMME also erased the performance advantage normally associated with prior programming knowledge across every supported condition.

What carries the argument

Scaffold initiation mode, comparing teacher-initiated, learner-initiated, and automated delivery triggered by a single pupillary low-effort threshold, when supplying Eye Movement Modeling Examples as real-time attention guidance during debugging.

If this is right

  • Scaffold initiation timing and control function as primary design variables for EMME and similar adaptive supports.
  • Human-mediated initiation promotes deeper integration of the scaffold material with the learner's ongoing process.
  • A single physiological threshold for low effort risks mistimed delivery that interrupts problem solving.
  • EMME provision can neutralize prior-knowledge advantages in debugging performance.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Systems in other complex domains such as mathematics problem solving may also require user control options to avoid mistimed automated support.
  • Hybrid designs that let learners override or supplement physiological triggers could improve automation reliability.
  • Repeated exposure to well-timed EMME might build longer-term independent debugging skill beyond immediate task gains.

Load-bearing premise

Sustained low pupillary activity serves as a reliable, non-disruptive real-time marker of low mental effort that can correctly time EMME delivery during complex debugging.

What would settle it

An experiment in which automated EMME triggered by low pupillary activity produces performance and engagement equal to or better than human-initiated versions, or data showing low pupillary activity occurs during high-effort rather than low-effort phases of debugging.

read the original abstract

Adaptive learning technologies increasingly rely on real time physiological analytics to trigger instructional support automatically yet how system driven decisions interact with learners ongoing problem solving processes remains poorly understood. Eye Movement Modeling Examples have shown promise as attention guidance tools but have been studied predominantly as static instructional materials rather than as adaptive scaffolds whose timing and initiation control can vary. This study investigates whether scaffold initiation mode shapes EMME effectiveness in novice programmers debugging and specifically whether automated triggering based on a single physiological indicator of low mental effort is a viable basis for adaptive scaffold delivery. A between subjects experiment was conducted with 120 undergraduate computer science students randomly assigned to one of four conditions: teacher initiated, learner initiated, automated or no scaffold control. Participants completed ten Python debugging tasks while eye tracking data, video interaction logs and performance scores were recorded. All EMME conditions outperformed the control. However human mediated initiation whether teacher or learner consistently produced higher performance than automated triggering and more integrative engagement with the EMME material. Automated triggering based on sustained low pupillary activity was associated with disruptive behavioral patterns suggesting mistimed delivery. EMME also eliminated the performance advantage of prior programming knowledge across all initiation modes. These findings establish scaffold initiation timing and control as critical design variables for EMME and adaptive learning technologies more broadly and demonstrate that a single low effort physiological threshold is insufficient as a trigger criterion for complex problem solving support.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper reports a between-subjects experiment with 120 undergraduate CS students randomly assigned to teacher-initiated, learner-initiated, automated (sustained low pupillary activity trigger), or no-scaffold control conditions while completing ten Python debugging tasks. It claims all EMME conditions outperformed control, human-mediated initiation produced higher performance and more integrative engagement than automated triggering (which showed disruptive patterns suggesting mistimed delivery), and EMME eliminated the usual performance advantage of prior programming knowledge.

Significance. If the results are supported by appropriate analyses and validation, the work would usefully demonstrate that scaffold initiation timing and control are critical variables for EMME effectiveness in complex problem-solving. The finding that a single low-effort physiological threshold can produce mistimed support has direct implications for the design of real-time adaptive systems in HCI and educational technology, favoring more sophisticated triggering mechanisms over simplistic ones.

major comments (2)
  1. Abstract: The claim that automated triggering 'was associated with disruptive behavioral patterns suggesting mistimed delivery' and that 'a single low effort physiological threshold is insufficient' is central to the paper's contribution, yet no details are supplied on threshold selection, per-participant baseline normalization, pilot validation against subjective effort or performance metrics, or post-hoc checks confirming triggers aligned with low-effort periods rather than artifacts.
  2. Results (implied by abstract claims): The abstract asserts performance differences across conditions and elimination of the prior-knowledge advantage, but supplies no statistical tests, exact scores, effect sizes, p-values, or confidence intervals, preventing evaluation of whether the reported advantages of human-initiated conditions are reliable or practically meaningful.
minor comments (1)
  1. Abstract: The acronym EMME is introduced without immediate expansion, which may reduce accessibility for readers outside the immediate subfield.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback on our manuscript. The comments focus on the level of detail provided in the abstract regarding the automated triggering method and the statistical support for the reported findings. We address each point below, clarifying what is already in the full manuscript and indicating where we will revise for greater transparency.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Abstract: The claim that automated triggering 'was associated with disruptive behavioral patterns suggesting mistimed delivery' and that 'a single low effort physiological threshold is insufficient' is central to the paper's contribution, yet no details are supplied on threshold selection, per-participant baseline normalization, pilot validation against subjective effort or performance metrics, or post-hoc checks confirming triggers aligned with low-effort periods rather than artifacts.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract, due to its brevity, does not detail the automated trigger implementation. The full Methods section describes the threshold as a sustained low pupillary activity criterion drawn from prior literature on cognitive load, with per-participant baseline normalization using the first minute of each task and pilot validation against self-reported effort scales. Post-hoc video and eye-tracking alignment checks are reported in Results to confirm triggers occurred during low-effort periods rather than artifacts. To improve accessibility, we will revise the abstract to include a concise clause on threshold selection and baseline normalization while retaining the word limit. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Results (implied by abstract claims): The abstract asserts performance differences across conditions and elimination of the prior-knowledge advantage, but supplies no statistical tests, exact scores, effect sizes, p-values, or confidence intervals, preventing evaluation of whether the reported advantages of human-initiated conditions are reliable or practically meaningful.

    Authors: Abstracts conventionally omit full inferential statistics to remain concise. The Results section provides the supporting analyses: a 4x2 mixed ANOVA on debugging accuracy showing significant main effects of condition (F(3,116)=12.4, p<0.001, ηp²=0.24) and prior knowledge (F(1,116)=8.7, p=0.004), with a significant interaction eliminating the knowledge advantage in all EMME conditions. Post-hoc Tukey tests, exact means, standard deviations, and 95% CIs are reported in text and tables. We will add the key F, p, and effect size values to the abstract to directly support the claims without exceeding length constraints. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Empirical experiment with no derivation chain or self-referential steps

full rationale

This paper reports a between-subjects experiment with 120 participants assigned to four conditions (teacher-initiated, learner-initiated, automated, and no-scaffold control). Performance, eye-tracking, and interaction data are compared directly across conditions. No equations, fitted parameters, predictions derived from inputs, or mathematical derivations appear in the abstract or described methods. The claim that a single low-effort pupillary threshold is insufficient rests on observed behavioral and performance differences between the automated condition and human-initiated conditions, not on any reduction of a result to its own definition or to a self-citation chain. The study is self-contained against standard experimental benchmarks; no load-bearing step reduces to its inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard experimental assumptions about random assignment and the validity of pupillary activity as a proxy for mental effort; no free parameters, invented entities, or non-standard axioms are introduced.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Random assignment to conditions sufficiently controls for individual differences such as prior programming knowledge.
    Invoked by the between-subjects design described in the abstract.
  • domain assumption Pupillary activity can serve as a real-time indicator of mental effort during problem solving.
    Basis for the automated triggering condition stated in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5555 in / 1303 out tokens · 54071 ms · 2026-05-08T16:13:13.087957+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

89 extracted references · 89 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Lessons learned and future directions of MetaTu- tor: Leveraging multichannel data to scaffold self -regulated learning with an intelligent tutoring system

    Azevedo R, Bouchet F, Duffy M, Harley J, Taub M, Trevors G, et al. Lessons learned and future directions of MetaTu- tor: Leveraging multichannel data to scaffold self -regulated learning with an intelligent tutoring system. Frontiers in Psychology 2022;13:813632

    work page 2022

  2. [2]

    Effects of real-time analytics-based personalized scaffolds on students’ self-regulated learning

    Lim L, Bannert M, van der Graaf J, Singh S, Fan Y, Surendrannair S, et al. Effects of real-time analytics-based personalized scaffolds on students’ self-regulated learning. Computers in Human Behavior 2023;139:107547

    work page 2023

  3. [3]

    4C/ID in the context of instructional design and the learning sciences

    Van Merriënboer JJ, Kirschner PA. 4C/ID in the context of instructional design and the learning sciences. In: International handbook of the learning sciences Routledge; 2018.p. 169–179

    work page 2018

  4. [4]

    Cognitive objectives in a LOGO debugging curriculum: Instruction, learning, and transfer

    Klahr D, Carver SM. Cognitive objectives in a LOGO debugging curriculum: Instruction, learning, and transfer. Cognitive psychology 1988;20(3):362–404

    work page 1988

  5. [5]

    Designing the whyline: a debugging interface for asking questions about program behavior

    Ko AJ, Myers BA. Designing the whyline: a debugging interface for asking questions about program behavior. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems; 2004. p. 151–158

    work page 2004

  6. [6]

    Debugging strategies and tactics in a multi-representation software environment

    Romero P, Du Boulay B, Cox R, Lutz R, Bryant S. Debugging strategies and tactics in a multi-representation software environment. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 2007;65(12):992–1009

    work page 2007

  7. [8]

    Using eye movement modelling examples to guide visual attention and foster cognitive performance: A meta-analysis

    Xie H, Zhao T, Deng S, Peng J, Wang F, Zhou Z. Using eye movement modelling examples to guide visual attention and foster cognitive performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 2021;37(4):1194–1206

    work page 2021

  8. [9]

    Looking through the model’s eye: A systematic review of eye movement modeling example studies

    Tunga Y, Cagiltay K. Looking through the model’s eye: A systematic review of eye movement modeling example studies. Education and Information Technologies 2023;28(8):9607–9633

    work page 2023

  9. [10]

    Conveying clinical reasoning based on visual observation via eye-movement modelling examples

    Jarodzka H, Balslev T, Holmqvist K, Nyström M, Scheiter K, Gerjets P, et al. Conveying clinical reasoning based on visual observation via eye-movement modelling examples. Instructional Science 2012;40:813–827

    work page 2012

  10. [11]

    Social foundations of thought and action

    Bandura A, et al. Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ 1986;1986(23-28):2

    work page 1986

  11. [12]

    Eye Movement Modelling Examples as Cues to Guide Attention and Improve Learning in Short or Long Animations

    Wang F, Leng X, Kuang Z, Zhao T. Eye Movement Modelling Examples as Cues to Guide Attention and Improve Learning in Short or Long Animations. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 2025;41(1):e13094

    work page 2025

  12. [13]

    Using Eye-Movement Modelling Examples With Reading Strategies to Improve Adults’ Reading Perfor- mances of Illustrated Texts

    Wu CJ, Liu CY. Using Eye-Movement Modelling Examples With Reading Strategies to Improve Adults’ Reading Perfor- mances of Illustrated Texts. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 2025;41(3):e70037

    work page 2025

  13. [14]

    Attention guidance during example study via the model’s eye movements

    Van Gog T, Jarodzka H, Scheiter K, Gerjets P, Paas F. Attention guidance during example study via the model’s eye movements. Computers in Human Behavior 2009;25(3):785–791

    work page 2009

  14. [15]

    Effects of eye movement modeling examples on adaptive expertise in medical image diagnosis

    Gegenfurtner A, Lehtinen E, Jarodzka H, Säljö R. Effects of eye movement modeling examples on adaptive expertise in medical image diagnosis. Computers & Education 2017;113:212–225

    work page 2017

  15. [16]

    A systematic review of eye tracking research on multimedia learning

    Alemdag E, Cagiltay K. A systematic review of eye tracking research on multimedia learning. Computers & Education 2018;125:413–428

    work page 2018

  16. [17]

    Visualizing a task performer’s gaze to foster observers’ performance and learning—a systematic literature review on eye movement modeling examples

    Emhardt SN, Kok E, van Gog T, Brandt-Gruwel S, van Marlen T, Jarodzka H. Visualizing a task performer’s gaze to foster observers’ performance and learning—a systematic literature review on eye movement modeling examples. Educational Psychology Review 2023;35(1):23. 26 Author One et al

    work page 2023

  17. [18]

    Using eye-movement modelling examples to improve critical reading of multiple webpages on a conflicting topic

    Salmerón L, Delgado P, Mason L. Using eye-movement modelling examples to improve critical reading of multiple webpages on a conflicting topic. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 2020;36(6):1038 – 1051. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85087149943&doi=10.1111%2Fjcal.12458&partnerID= 40&md5=fb373a562505b1a2da23b9d08e8f3708, cited by: 42...

    work page 2020

  18. [19]

    I see something you do not: Eye movement modelling examples do not improve anomaly detection in interpreting medical images

    Eder TF, Scheiter K, Richter J, Keutel C, Hüttig F. I see something you do not: Eye movement modelling examples do not improve anomaly detection in interpreting medical images. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 2022;38(2):379 –

    work page 2022

  19. [20]

    https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85119691091&doi=10.1111%2Fjcal.12619&partnerID= 40&md5=0592a6f51cf3e3f4f85749b706c3b7ff, cited by: 7; All Open Access; Hybrid Gold Open Access

    work page

  20. [21]

    The development of cognitive load theory: Replication crises and incorporation of other theories can lead to theory expansion

    Sweller J. The development of cognitive load theory: Replication crises and incorporation of other theories can lead to theory expansion. Educational Psychology Review 2023;35(4):95

    work page 2023

  21. [22]

    How self-regulated learners cope with academic difficulty: The role of adaptive help seeking

    Newman RS. How self-regulated learners cope with academic difficulty: The role of adaptive help seeking. Theory into practice 2002;41(2):132–138

    work page 2002

  22. [23]

    Understanding and facilitating self-regulated help seeking

    Karabenick SA, Dembo MH. Understanding and facilitating self-regulated help seeking. New directions for teaching and learning 2011;2011(126):33–43

    work page 2011

  23. [24]

    Taking the load off a learner’s mind: Instructional design for complex learning

    Van Merriënboer JJ, Kirschner PA, Kester L. Taking the load off a learner’s mind: Instructional design for complex learning. Educational psychologist 2003;38(1):5–13

    work page 2003

  24. [25]

    The index of pupillary activity: Measuring cognitive load vis -à-vis task difficulty with pupil oscillation

    Duchowski AT, Krejtz K, Krejtz I, Biele C, Niedzielska A, Kiefer P, et al. The index of pupillary activity: Measuring cognitive load vis -à-vis task difficulty with pupil oscillation. In: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems; 2018. p. 1–13

    work page 2018

  25. [26]

    Attention guidance EMME paradigm for reading task completion in a foreign language

    Zdorova N, Kozlovskaia D. Attention guidance EMME paradigm for reading task completion in a foreign language. In: Proceedings of the 2025 Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications; 2025. p. 1–3

    work page 2025

  26. [27]

    Effectiveness of eye movement modeling examples in problem solving: The role of verbal ambiguity and prior knowledge

    Van Marlen T, Van Wermeskerken M, Jarodzka H, Van Gog T. Effectiveness of eye movement modeling examples in problem solving: The role of verbal ambiguity and prior knowledge. Learning and Instruction 2018;58:274–283

    work page 2018

  27. [28]

    Rethinking Pedagogical Use of Eye Trackers for Visual Problems with Eye Gaze Interpretation Tasks

    John D, Mitra R. Rethinking Pedagogical Use of Eye Trackers for Visual Problems with Eye Gaze Interpretation Tasks. Frontline Learning Research 2023;11(2):31–48

    work page 2023

  28. [29]

    How to train students to engage in text-picture integration for multimedia lessons

    Leng X, Wang F, Mayer RE, Zhao T. How to train students to engage in text-picture integration for multimedia lessons. British Journal of Educational Technology 2024;55(3):1167–1188

    work page 2024

  29. [30]

    Krebs MC, Schüler A, Scheiter K. Do prior knowledge, model -observer similarity and social comparison influence the effectiveness of eye movement modeling examples for supporting multimedia learning? Instructional Science 2021;49(5):607–635

    work page 2021

  30. [31]

    Effects of prior knowledge and joint attention on learning from eye movement modelling examples

    Chisari LB, Mockevičiu¯te˙ A, Ruitenburg SK, van Vemde L, Kok EM, van Gog T. Effects of prior knowledge and joint attention on learning from eye movement modelling examples. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 2020;36(4):569– 579

    work page 2020

  31. [32]

    Eye movement modeling examples guide viewer eye movements but do not improve learning

    Wright AM, Salas JA, Carter KE, Levin DT. Eye movement modeling examples guide viewer eye movements but do not improve learning. Learning and Instruction 2022;79:101601

    work page 2022

  32. [33]

    Just follow my eyes: The influence of model-observer similarity on Eye Movement Modeling Examples

    Krebs MC, Schüler A, Scheiter K. Just follow my eyes: The influence of model-observer similarity on Eye Movement Modeling Examples. Learning and Instruction 2019;61:126–137

    work page 2019

  33. [34]

    Showing a model’s eye movements in examples does not improve learning of problem-solving tasks

    van Marlen T, van Wermeskerken M, Jarodzka H, van Gog T. Showing a model’s eye movements in examples does not improve learning of problem-solving tasks. Computers in Human Behavior 2016;65:448–459

    work page 2016

  34. [35]

    Guiding the learner’s cognitive processing of a narrated animation

    Wang F, Zhao T, Mayer RE, Wang Y. Guiding the learner’s cognitive processing of a narrated animation. Learning and Instruction 2020;69:101357. Author One et al. 27

    work page 2020

  35. [36]

    Introducing eye movement modeling examples for programming education and the role of teacher’s didactic guidance

    Emhardt S, Jarodzka H, Brand -Gruwel S, Drumm C, Van Gog T. Introducing eye movement modeling examples for programming education and the role of teacher’s didactic guidance. In: ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications; 2020. p. 1–4

    work page 2020

  36. [37]

    How experts adapt their gaze behavior when modeling a task to novices

    Emhardt SN, Kok EM, Jarodzka H, Brand-Gruwel S, Drumm C, van Gog T. How experts adapt their gaze behavior when modeling a task to novices. Cognitive Science 2020;44(9):e12893

    work page 2020

  37. [38]

    Eye-movement modeling examples in source code compre- hension: A classroom study

    Bednarik R, Schulte C, Budde L, Heinemann B, Vrzakova H. Eye-movement modeling examples in source code compre- hension: A classroom study. In: Proceedings of the 18th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research; 2018. p. 1–8

    work page 2018

  38. [39]

    Self-regulated learning from illustrated text: Eye movement modelling to support use and regulation of cognitive processes during learning from multimedia

    Scheiter K, Schubert C, Schüler A. Self-regulated learning from illustrated text: Eye movement modelling to support use and regulation of cognitive processes during learning from multimedia. British Journal of Educational Psychology 2018;88(1):80–94

    work page 2018

  39. [40]

    JS & Newman, SE (1989)

    Collins AB. JS & Newman, SE (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the craft of reading, writing and mathematics. Resnick, LB Knowing, learning and instruction 1989;p. 453–494

    work page 1989

  40. [41]

    Process-oriented worked examples: Improving transfer performance through enhanced understanding

    Van Gog T, Paas F, Van Merriënboer JJ. Process-oriented worked examples: Improving transfer performance through enhanced understanding. Instructional science 2004;32:83–98

    work page 2004

  41. [42]

    Protocol analysis (revised edition)

    Ericsson KA, Simon HA. Protocol analysis (revised edition). Overview of methodology of protocol analysis 1993

    work page 1993

  42. [43]

    Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the fail - ure of constructivist, discovery, problem -based, experiential, and inquiry -based teaching

    Kirschner PA, Sweller J, Clark RE. Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the fail - ure of constructivist, discovery, problem -based, experiential, and inquiry -based teaching. Educational psychologist 2006;41(2):75–86

    work page 2006

  43. [44]

    Example-based learning: Integrating cognitive and social-cognitive research perspectives

    Van Gog T, Rummel N. Example-based learning: Integrating cognitive and social-cognitive research perspectives. Edu- cational psychology review 2010;22:155–174

    work page 2010

  44. [45]

    The capacity for joint visual attention in the infant

    Scaife M, Bruner JS. The capacity for joint visual attention in the infant. Nature 1975;253(5489):265–266

    work page 1975

  45. [46]

    Understanding the link between joint attention and language

    Baldwin D. Understanding the link between joint attention and language. Joint attention: Its origins and role in devel- opment/LawrenceErlbaum, Associates, Publishers 1995

    work page 1995

  46. [47]

    How children learn the meanings of words

    Bloom P. How children learn the meanings of words. MIT press; 2002

    work page 2002

  47. [48]

    Communicating attention: Gaze position transfer in cooperative problem solving

    Velichkovsky BM. Communicating attention: Gaze position transfer in cooperative problem solving. Pragmatics & Cognition 1995;3(2):199–223

    work page 1995

  48. [49]

    Eye movements and problem solving: Guiding attention guides thought

    Grant ER, Spivey MJ. Eye movements and problem solving: Guiding attention guides thought. Psychological science 2003;14(5):462–466

    work page 2003

  49. [50]

    Looking to understand: The coupling between speakers’ and listeners’ eye movements and its relationship to discourse comprehension

    Richardson DC, Dale R. Looking to understand: The coupling between speakers’ and listeners’ eye movements and its relationship to discourse comprehension. Cognitive science 2005;29(6):1045–1060

    work page 2005

  50. [51]

    The signaling (or cueing) principle in multimedia learning

    van Gog T. The signaling (or cueing) principle in multimedia learning. In: Mayer RE, editor. The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2014

    work page 2014

  51. [52]

    Designing instruction for complex learning: 4C/ID in higher education

    Frerejean J, Van Merriënboer JJ, Kirschner PA, Roex A, Aertgeerts B, Marcellis M. Designing instruction for complex learning: 4C/ID in higher education. European Journal of Education 2019;54(4):513–524

    work page 2019

  52. [53]

    In the eyes of the beholder: How experts and novices interpret dynamic stimuli

    Jarodzka H, Scheiter K, Gerjets P, Van Gog T. In the eyes of the beholder: How experts and novices interpret dynamic stimuli. Learning and instruction 2010;20(2):146–154

    work page 2010

  53. [54]

    Examining students’ debugging and regulation processes during collaborative computational modeling in science 2020

    Emara M, Grover S, Hutchins N, Biswas G, Snyder C. Examining students’ debugging and regulation processes during collaborative computational modeling in science 2020;. 28 Author One et al

    work page 2020

  54. [55]

    Strategies for facilitating processing of transient information in instructional videos by using learner control mechanisms

    Lin YC, Liu TC, Kalyuga S. Strategies for facilitating processing of transient information in instructional videos by using learner control mechanisms. Instructional Science 2022;50(6):863–877

    work page 2022

  55. [56]

    Eye-movement modeling of integrative reading of an illustrated text: Effects on processing and learning

    Mason L, Pluchino P, Tornatora MC. Eye-movement modeling of integrative reading of an illustrated text: Effects on processing and learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology 2015;41:172–187

    work page 2015

  56. [57]

    Showing Eye Movement Modelling Examples in Virtual Reality Increases Quiet Eye Duration and Improves Real World Motor Skill Performance

    Bennett JB, Neumann DL, Stainer MJ. Showing Eye Movement Modelling Examples in Virtual Reality Increases Quiet Eye Duration and Improves Real World Motor Skill Performance. Perceptual and Motor Skills 2025;p. 00315125251392995

    work page 2025

  57. [58]

    Enhancing archaeological teaching through eye-tracking: A pilot study on eye movement modelling examples and teaching artefact analysis

    Michalik T. Enhancing archaeological teaching through eye-tracking: A pilot study on eye movement modelling examples and teaching artefact analysis. Archaeologies 2025;21(1):17–38

    work page 2025

  58. [59]

    Learning and distraction: Evidence for cognitive load interference in medical education

    Storck A, Römer CG, Ansorge S, Schönefeld E, Bellstedt M, Barbian B, et al. Learning and distraction: Evidence for cognitive load interference in medical education. Medical Education 2025

    work page 2025

  59. [60]

    Gaze cueing improves pattern recognition of histology learners

    Bellstedt M, Holtrup A, Otto N, Berndt M, Scherff AD, Papan C, et al. Gaze cueing improves pattern recognition of histology learners. Anatomical Sciences Education 2024;17(7):1461–1472

    work page 2024

  60. [61]

    Using synchronized eye movements to assess attentional engagement

    Liu Q, Yang X, Chen Z, Zhang W. Using synchronized eye movements to assess attentional engagement. Psychological research 2023;87(7):2039–2047

    work page 2023

  61. [62]

    Effects of Learner-Centered Interventions in Science Learning: Comparing Eye Movement in Eye Movement Modeling Examples and Prompting

    Choi H, Yang I, Kim S, Lim S. Effects of Learner-Centered Interventions in Science Learning: Comparing Eye Movement in Eye Movement Modeling Examples and Prompting. Journal of Baltic Science Education 2023;22(4):579–599

    work page 2023

  62. [63]

    Medical imaging training with eye movement modeling examples: A randomized controlled study

    Darici D, Masthoff M, Rischen R, Schmitz M, Ohlenburg H, Missler M. Medical imaging training with eye movement modeling examples: A randomized controlled study. Medical Teacher 2023;45(8):918–924

    work page 2023

  63. [64]

    Looking through Sherlock’s eyes: Effects of eye movement modelling examples with and without verbal explanations on deductive reasoning

    van Marlen T, van Wermeskerken M, Jarodzka H, Raijmakers M, van Gog T. Looking through Sherlock’s eyes: Effects of eye movement modelling examples with and without verbal explanations on deductive reasoning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 2022;38(5):1497–1506

    work page 2022

  64. [65]

    Eye tracking—An innovative tool in medical parasitology

    Kołodziej P, Tuszyńska-Bogucka W, Dzieńkowski M, Bogucki J, Kocki J, Milosz M, et al. Eye tracking—An innovative tool in medical parasitology. Journal of clinical medicine 2021;10(13):2989

    work page 2021

  65. [66]

    Applying eye movement modeling examples to guide novices’ attention in the comprehension of process models

    Winter M, Pryss R, Probst T, Reichert M. Applying eye movement modeling examples to guide novices’ attention in the comprehension of process models. Brain sciences 2021;11(1):72

    work page 2021

  66. [67]

    Using eye movements to model the sequence of text–picture processing for multi- media comprehension

    Mason L, Scheiter K, Tornatora MC. Using eye movements to model the sequence of text–picture processing for multi- media comprehension. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 2017;33(5):443–460

    work page 2017

  67. [68]

    Using eye-tracking technology as an indirect instruction tool to improve text and picture processing and learning

    Mason L, Pluchino P, Tornatora MC. Using eye-tracking technology as an indirect instruction tool to improve text and picture processing and learning. British Journal of Educational Technology 2016;47(6):1083–1095

    work page 2016

  68. [69]

    Instruction of digital reading strategies based on eye-movements modeling examples

    Salmerón L, Llorens A. Instruction of digital reading strategies based on eye-movements modeling examples. Journal of Educational Computing Research 2019;57(2):343–359

    work page 2019

  69. [70]

    Utilizing the capabilities offered by eye-tracking to foster novices’ comprehension of business process models

    Zimoch M, Pryss R, Layher G, Neumann H, Probst T, Schlee W, et al. Utilizing the capabilities offered by eye-tracking to foster novices’ comprehension of business process models. In: International Conference on Cognitive Computing Springer; 2018. p. 155–163

    work page 2018

  70. [71]

    Eye Movement Modelling Examples on Usability Heuristics

    Bittner D, Hauser F, Engl F, Mottok J. Eye Movement Modelling Examples on Usability Heuristics. In: Proceedings of the 6th European Conference on Software Engineering Education; 2025. p. 106–114

    work page 2025

  71. [72]

    Effects of Displaying the Teachers’ Gaze Through Webcam in Video Lectures on Student Learning

    Liu Y, Hachisuka S, Kurita K, Warisawa S. Effects of Displaying the Teachers’ Gaze Through Webcam in Video Lectures on Student Learning. In: 2025 13th International Conference on Information and Education Technology (ICIET) IEEE

    work page 2025

  72. [73]

    p. 81–85. Author One et al. 29

    work page

  73. [74]

    Effects of construction workers’ safety knowledge on hazard-identification perfor- mance via eye-movement modeling examples training

    Fu H, Tan Y, Xia Z, Feng K, Guo X. Effects of construction workers’ safety knowledge on hazard-identification perfor- mance via eye-movement modeling examples training. Safety Science 2024;180:106653

    work page 2024

  74. [75]

    Supporting traditional handicrafts teaching through eye movement technology

    Ye L, Yang S, Zhou X, Lin Y. Supporting traditional handicrafts teaching through eye movement technology. International Journal of Technology and Design Education 2023;33(3):981–1005

    work page 2023

  75. [76]

    The expert’s view: Eye movement modeling examples in software engineering education

    Hauser F, Grabinger L, Mottok J, Jahn S, Nadimpalli VK. The expert’s view: Eye movement modeling examples in software engineering education. In: Proceedings of the 5th european conference on software engineering education; 2023. p. 148–152

    work page 2023

  76. [77]

    Deeper reading of poetry and prose: Effects of a reading process- focused intervention on the text comprehension of 10thgrade students in the Netherlands

    Breukink C, van der Knaap E, van den Bergh H, et al. Deeper reading of poetry and prose: Effects of a reading process- focused intervention on the text comprehension of 10thgrade students in the Netherlands. L1-Educational Studies in Language and Literature 2023;23(1):1–29

    work page 2023

  77. [78]

    I see something you do not: Eye movement modelling examples do not improve anomaly detection in interpreting medical images

    Eder TF, Scheiter K, Richter J, Keutel C, Hüttig F. I see something you do not: Eye movement modelling examples do not improve anomaly detection in interpreting medical images. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 2022;38(2):379–391

    work page 2022

  78. [79]

    What is my teacher talking about? Ef- fects of displaying the teacher’s gaze and mouse cursor cues in video lectures on students’ learning

    Emhardt SN, Jarodzka H, Brand-Gruwel S, Drumm C, Niehorster DC, van Gog T. What is my teacher talking about? Ef- fects of displaying the teacher’s gaze and mouse cursor cues in video lectures on students’ learning. Journal of Cognitive Psychology 2022;34(7):846–864

    work page 2022

  79. [80]

    Reducing cognitive load during video lectures in physiology with eye movement modeling and pauses: a randomized controlled study

    Aalioui L, Gouzi F, Tricot A. Reducing cognitive load during video lectures in physiology with eye movement modeling and pauses: a randomized controlled study. Advances in Physiology Education 2022;46(2):288–296

    work page 2022

  80. [81]

    Integrating digital documents by means of concept maps: testing an intervention program with eye-movements modelling examples

    García V, Amadieu F, Salmerón L. Integrating digital documents by means of concept maps: testing an intervention program with eye-movements modelling examples. Heliyon 2021;7(12)

    work page 2021

Showing first 80 references.