arxiv: 2605.05357 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-06 · ✦ hep-th · astro-ph.CO· gr-qc

Recognition: unknown

Small Vacuum Energy and Tunneling in a Modified Bousso-Polchinski Model

James Halverson , Justin Khoury , Cody Long

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 16:28 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th astro-ph.COgr-qc

keywords cosmological constantflux vacuaCalabi-Yau fourfoldsBousso-Polchinski modelBrown-Teitelboim nucleationstring theory landscapevacuum energy spacing

0 comments

The pith

In a modified flux model, nearly all Calabi-Yau fourfolds allow vacuum energies spaced by 10^{-120} Planck units or less.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The authors introduce a simplified model for the cosmological constant inspired by type IIB and F-theory compactifications. Unlike the original Bousso-Polchinski setup, small vacuum energies cluster in thin wafers of flux space. When this model is applied to the full Schöller-Skarke database containing over 532 million distinct Calabi-Yau fourfolds, the overwhelming majority exhibit the required tiny spacing. Membrane nucleation via Brown-Teitelboim processes can fill the landscape, though transitions favor large jumps. The age of the universe imposes a topological bound that every entry in the database meets.

Core claim

The paper establishes that 99.95 percent of the distinct Hodge number sets in the Schöller-Skarke database of Calabi-Yau fourfolds produce a vacuum energy spacing of 10^{-120} in Planck units or smaller within the modified Bousso-Polchinski framework. Brown-Teitelboim membrane nucleation transitions populate these vacua but are always dominated by giant leaps in flux space under the thin-wall approximation without gravitational corrections. The entire database satisfies the bound on Calabi-Yau topology derived from the age of the universe.

What carries the argument

The modified Bousso-Polchinski model in which small vacuum energy spacings occur in thin wafers of flux space, rather than shells, applied across the Schöller-Skarke database of Calabi-Yau fourfolds.

If this is right

Brown-Teitelboim membrane nucleation can populate the landscape of flux vacua despite the dominance of large transitions.
The age of the universe constrains Calabi-Yau topology, and all known fourfolds in the database satisfy this constraint.
Small vacuum energy spacing is a generic feature for the vast majority of these compactifications.
Flux vacua with the observed cosmological constant scale are statistically common in this model.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If gravitational corrections to the thin-wall approximation prove significant, small-step transitions might allow more gradual exploration of the landscape.
This framework suggests that the string theory landscape can naturally select vacua with extremely small positive vacuum energy without additional tuning mechanisms.
Future extensions could incorporate the effects of gravity to check whether the giant-leap dominance persists.
Similar wafer structures might appear in other flux compactification models beyond type IIB and F-theory.

Load-bearing premise

The thin-wall approximation for membrane nucleation, combined with the neglect of gravitational corrections, under which bubble transitions are always dominated by giant leaps in flux space.

What would settle it

A explicit calculation for one of the Calabi-Yau fourfolds in the database that yields a vacuum energy spacing larger than 10^{-120} Planck units, or an observation of a small-step membrane transition in a realistic flux vacuum setup.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.05357 by Cody Long, James Halverson, Justin Khoury.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: Fig.1 view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Geometric quantities determining flux counts. The tadpole constraint sets the ball radius p χ/12, while the distance from the origin to the thickness-w wafer is q V2Λ0/(3 Πˆ 2 ). Rdisk controls the number of lattice points and flux vacua with small cosmological constant. Together, the hyperplane equation (3.11) and tadpole condition (3.8) restrict the allowed 9 view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Vacuum energy spacing, defined as ∆Λ Λ0 > δ in Eq. (3.26), applied to the Sch¨ollerSkarke database. Top row: For the most general four-form fluxes afforded by the theory, i.e., with J = b4, we show the spacing bound δ as a function of J and χ (Left) and as a function of h 1,1 and h 3,1 (Right), which are exchanged under mirror symmetry. Bottom row: Same plots now restricted to self-dual fluxes, i.e., with… view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Lattice point estimates comparing saddlepoint and volume methods. Left: Fixed dimension d = 23220 with varying Q. Right: Fixed Q = 972 with varying dimension d. In this Section we collect facts and perform some elementary computations about the number of lattiec points in Bd,R, the d-dimensional ball of radius R. Let N(d, R) be the number of lattice points in Bd,R, and let Nsaddle(d, R) and Nvol(d, R) deno… view at source ↗

read the original abstract

We propose a simplified model for the cosmological constant in string theory flux vacua motivated by type IIB and F-theory compactifications. Relative to the Bousso-Polchinski model, small vacuum energy spacing occurs in thin wafers rather than thin shells. The model is applied to the entire Sch\"oller-Skarke database of Calabi-Yau fourfolds, which exhibit $532,600,483$ distinct sets of Hodge numbers. The overwhelming majority of those ($99.95\%$ percent for some choices of parameters) exhibit a vacuum energy spacing of~$10^{-120}$ in Planck units or smaller. Brown-Teitelboim membrane nucleation transitions can populate this landscape of flux vacua. In the thin-wall approximation, and ignoring gravitational corrections, we find that the bubble transitions are always dominated by giant leaps in flux space. The age of the universe places a bound on Calabi-Yau topology that is satisfied for the entire Sch\"oller-Skarke database.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The wafer tweak makes tiny vacuum energy spacings typical for 99.95% of the Schöller-Skarke fourfolds under chosen parameters, but the giant-leap transition claim only holds inside the thin-wall no-gravity limit.

read the letter

The main result is that this modified Bousso-Polchinski setup with wafer geometry produces vacuum energy spacings of 10^{-120} or smaller in the great majority of the 532 million Calabi-Yau fourfold topologies. They run the full database and report the 99.95% figure for some parameter choices, plus the observation that universe-age bounds on topology are satisfied everywhere in the set. The scale of that enumeration is the clearest piece of new work here, and the explicit statistics on spacing and transition dominance have not been done at this volume before. That part is straightforward and useful for anyone tracking landscape statistics. The transition analysis is more limited. The paper states outright that the giant-leap dominance is found only in the thin-wall approximation while ignoring gravitational corrections. For the vacua that actually hit the 10^{-120} spacing, the energy difference is so small that the critical bubble radius becomes super-Hubble, which means gravitational back-reaction and Coleman-De Luccia effects should enter. Nothing in the text quantifies how much those corrections change the rate or the dominance conclusion, so the claim that the landscape can be populated by these transitions rests on an uncontrolled regime precisely where the small-spacing result matters most. The headline percentage is also tied to specific choices for flux discretization and wafer thickness, so it is not a robust, parameter-free prediction. This is the kind of concrete computational paper that landscape modelers will want to see. It deserves a serious referee because the database scan is new and falsifiable in principle, even though the dynamics section will need tighter checks on the approximations. I would send it to review.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper presents a modified Bousso-Polchinski model for the string landscape in which small vacuum energies arise in thin 'wafers' of flux space. Applying this to the complete Schöller-Skarke database of Calabi-Yau fourfolds (532,600,483 Hodge number sets), it finds that 99.95% of these (under certain parameter choices) have vacuum energy level spacings of 10^{-120} Planck units or less. It further claims that Brown-Teitelboim tunneling transitions, analyzed in the thin-wall limit without gravity, are always dominated by giant leaps in flux space, and that the age of the universe imposes a Calabi-Yau topology bound that is satisfied by all entries in the database.

Significance. Should the results prove robust, this would offer a concrete, computationally verified example of a string landscape densely populated with small cosmological constants, together with a tunneling-based population mechanism. The exhaustive scan of the Schöller-Skarke database is a positive feature. The work builds on established flux compactification techniques but the dependence on modeling parameters and the scope of the approximations limit its significance until addressed.

major comments (2)

[Abstract] The assertion that bubble transitions 'are always dominated by giant leaps in flux space' is made only 'in the thin-wall approximation, and ignoring gravitational corrections.' For the small-ΔV vacua of interest (ΔV ≲ 10^{-120}), the thin-wall critical radius R_c ~ σ/ΔV becomes much larger than the Hubble scale. Gravitational corrections and Coleman-De Luccia effects then become important and could change the dominant transition channel. No quantitative estimate of the size of these corrections is given, which is central to the claim that the landscape can be populated by such transitions.
[Abstract] The headline result that 99.95% of configurations exhibit vacuum energy spacing of 10^{-120} or smaller is explicitly qualified as holding 'for some choices of parameters.' The wafer thickness and flux discretization parameters control the spacing by construction, rendering the percentage a conditional statement rather than a generic prediction of the model. This parameter dependence should be explored more fully to assess how natural the small-spacing regime is.

minor comments (1)

The abstract refers to 'the entire Schöller-Skarke database' without indicating the precise mapping from Hodge numbers to the wafer parameters; this mapping should be stated explicitly early in the manuscript.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We address each major comment point by point below, indicating where revisions will be made to strengthen the presentation and clarify limitations.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] The assertion that bubble transitions 'are always dominated by giant leaps in flux space' is made only 'in the thin-wall approximation, and ignoring gravitational corrections.' For the small-ΔV vacua of interest (ΔV ≲ 10^{-120}), the thin-wall critical radius R_c ~ σ/ΔV becomes much larger than the Hubble scale. Gravitational corrections and Coleman-De Luccia effects then become important and could change the dominant transition channel. No quantitative estimate of the size of these corrections is given, which is central to the claim that the landscape can be populated by such transitions.

Authors: We agree that the thin-wall approximation without gravitational corrections represents a significant simplification, and that for the extremely small vacuum energy differences of interest, Coleman-De Luccia effects could modify the tunneling rates and potentially the dominant channels. Our manuscript explicitly qualifies the claim as holding only in this approximation. We will revise the relevant sections to include a more detailed discussion of the regime of validity, the expected size of gravitational corrections based on order-of-magnitude estimates, and a clear statement that a full quantitative treatment lies beyond the present scope. This addresses the concern by making the limitations more transparent while preserving the scope of the current analysis. revision: partial
Referee: [Abstract] The headline result that 99.95% of configurations exhibit vacuum energy spacing of 10^{-120} or smaller is explicitly qualified as holding 'for some choices of parameters.' The wafer thickness and flux discretization parameters control the spacing by construction, rendering the percentage a conditional statement rather than a generic prediction of the model. This parameter dependence should be explored more fully to assess how natural the small-spacing regime is.

Authors: We acknowledge that the reported percentage is conditional on the choice of wafer thickness and flux discretization parameters, as these directly set the effective spacing in the model. To address this, we will expand the manuscript with additional figures and text exploring a broader range of these parameters. This will show the fraction of configurations achieving spacings ≲ 10^{-120} as a function of the parameters and discuss the extent to which the small-spacing regime can be considered natural within the model's assumptions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper defines a modified flux model, applies it to the external Schöller-Skarke database of 532 million Calabi-Yau fourfolds, and computes vacuum-energy distributions and transition rates under explicitly stated thin-wall/no-gravity approximations. All headline statistics (e.g., 99.95 % fraction) are direct outputs of that scan for chosen parameters; the giant-leap dominance statement is likewise a direct calculation within the stated limits. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to a self-definition, a fitted input renamed as prediction, or a self-citation chain. The derivation remains self-contained against the external database and the model's own equations.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The analysis rests on standard type IIB/F-theory flux compactification assumptions plus the Brown-Teitelboim nucleation mechanism; the wafer geometry is an additional modeling choice whose scale is set by hand.

free parameters (1)

flux discretization and wafer thickness parameters
Specific numerical choices of these parameters determine both the 99.95% fraction and the 10^{-120} spacing threshold.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Fluxes through cycles are quantized integers
Standard assumption in type IIB and F-theory flux vacua invoked to discretize the landscape.
domain assumption Brown-Teitelboim membrane nucleation governs vacuum transitions
Used to populate the landscape and analyze bubble dynamics.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5474 in / 1609 out tokens · 62482 ms · 2026-05-08T16:28:55.733360+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 50 canonical work pages

[1]

A Modified Bousso-Polchinski Model 3
[2]

Improved Vacuum Counts with a Saddlepoint Approximation

Vacuum Energy Spacing 7 3.1. Improved Vacuum Counts with a Saddlepoint Approximation . . . . . 11 3.2. Vacuum Energy Spacing in the Sch¨ oller-Skarke Database . . . . . . . 12
[3]

Lifetime Considerations

Membrane Nucleation and Decay Rates 15 4.1. Lifetime Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
[4]

Dirichlet’s Approximation Theorem 21 Appendix B

Conclusions 19 Appendix A. Dirichlet’s Approximation Theorem 21 Appendix B. Lattice Points in High Dimensional Spheres 22 Appendix C. Normalization of Holomorphic Top-form 23 1
[5]

giant leaps

Introduction Flux compactifications of string theory yield a discretuum of vacuum energies and rich cosmological dynamics that can potentially account for the observed small value of the cosmological constant. In [ 1], Bousso and Polchinski (BP) proposed that such a discretuum, together with Brown-Teitelboim membrane nucleation [ 2], would lead to a bubbl...
[6]

Let us being by reviewing the BP model and some of its subtleties as a toy model for IIB moduli stabilization scenarios

A Modified Bousso-Polchinski Model Our goal in this Section is to modify the BP model by including some details motivated by the GKP solution [ 3] and type IIB/F-theory moduli stabilization scenarios, such as KKLT [4] and LVS [5]. Let us being by reviewing the BP model and some of its subtleties as a toy model for IIB moduli stabilization scenarios. It po...
[7]

Specifically, we are interested in the existence of flux vacua with vacuum energy sufficiently close to a fixed value V⋆

Vacuum Energy Spacing Following BP, the question we would like to address is whether the discretuum of flux vacua, with potential energy given by (2.14), is dense enough to achieve a vacuum energy with the requisite sensitivity. Specifically, we are interested in the existence of flux vacua with vacuum energy sufficiently close to a fixed value V⋆. For co...
[8]

down-tunneling

Membrane Nucleation and Decay Rates Equipped with a simplified model for the cosmological constant, we may consider dynamical transitions between vacua via tunneling effects in cosmology. Consider a flux changing transition via the Brown-Teitelboim mechanism, wherein N7→N ′ =N+ ∆N .(4.1) For simplicity, we assume the transition is mediated by a BPS or ant...
[9]

Conclusions In this paper we have studied a modified BP model motivated by Type IIB and F-theory flux compactifications, with vacuum energy given by V= Λ 0 − 3 V2 |NIΠI|2 ,(5.1) where we allow Λ 0 to have volume dependence as Λ 0 = ˜Λ0/V α. The key structural difference relative to the original BP model is the sign of the flux contribution: rather than ra...

2019
[10]

Quantization of Four-form Fluxes and Dynamical Neutralization of the Cosmological Constant

R. Bousso & J. Polchinski,“Quantization of four form fluxes and dynamical neutralization of the cosmological constant”, JHEP0006, 006 (2000),hep-th/0004134

work page Pith review arXiv 2000
[11]

Neutralization of the Cosmological Constant by Membrane Creation

J. D. Brown & C. Teitelboim,“Neutralization of the Cosmological Constant by Membrane Creation”, Nucl. Phys. B297, 787 (1988)

1988
[12]

Hierarchies from Fluxes in String Compactifications

S. B. Giddings, S. Kachru & J. Polchinski,“Hierarchies from fluxes in string compacti- fications”, Phys. Rev. D66, 106006 (2002),hep-th/0105097

work page Pith review arXiv 2002
[13]

de Sitter Vacua in String Theory

S. Kachru, R. Kallosh, A. D. Linde & S. P. Trivedi,“De Sitter vacua in string theory”, Phys. Rev. D68, 046005 (2003),hep-th/0301240

work page Pith review arXiv 2003
[14]

Systematics of Moduli Stabilisation in Calabi-Yau Flux Compactifications

V. Balasubramanian, P. Berglund, J. P. Conlon & F. Quevedo,“Systematics of moduli stabilisation in Calabi-Yau flux compactifications”, JHEP0503, 007 (2005), hep-th/0502058

work page Pith review arXiv 2005
[15]

Counting flux vacua

S. Ashok & M. R. Douglas,“Counting flux vacua”, JHEP0401, 060 (2004), hep-th/0307049

work page arXiv 2004
[16]

Distributions of nonsupersymmetric flux vacua

F. Denef & M. R. Douglas,“Distributions of nonsupersymmetric flux vacua”, JHEP 0503, 061 (2005),hep-th/0411183

work page arXiv 2005
[17]

Distributions of flux vacua

F. Denef & M. R. Douglas,“Distributions of flux vacua”, JHEP0405, 072 (2004), hep-th/0404116

work page arXiv 2004
[18]

The F-theory geometry with most flux vacua

W. Taylor & Y.-N. Wang,“The F-theory geometry with most flux vacua”, JHEP1512, 164 (2015),arXiv:1511.03209 [hep-th]. 24

work page Pith review arXiv 2015
[19]

Algorithmic universality in F-theory compactifica- tions

J. Halverson, C. Long & B. Sung,“Algorithmic universality in F-theory compactifica- tions”, Phys. Rev. D96, 126006 (2017),arXiv:1706.02299 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2017
[20]

Scanning the skeleton of the 4D F-theory landscape

W. Taylor & Y.-N. Wang,“Scanning the skeleton of the 4D F-theory landscape”, JHEP 1801, 111 (2018),arXiv:1710.11235 [hep-th]

work page Pith review arXiv 2018
[21]

Small cosmological constants in string theory

M. Demirtas, M. Kim, L. McAllister, J. Moritz & A. Rios-Tascon,“Small cosmological constants in string theory”, Journal of High Energy Physics2021, 1 (2021)

2021
[22]

CYTools: A Software Package for Analyzing Calabi-Yau Manifolds

M. Demirtas, A. Rios-Tascon & L. McAllister,“CYTools: A Software Package for Analyzing Calabi-Yau Manifolds”,arXiv:2211.03823 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[23]

McAllister, J

L. McAllister, J. Moritz, R. Nally & A. Schachner,“Candidate de Sitter vacua”, Phys. Rev. D111, 086015 (2025),arXiv:2406.13751 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2025
[24]

Computational complexity of the landscape. I

F. Denef & M. R. Douglas,“Computational complexity of the landscape. I.”, Annals Phys.322, 1096 (2007),hep-th/0602072

work page arXiv 2007
[25]

On the computation of non-perturbative effective potentials in the string theory landscape: IIB/F-theory perspective

M. Cvetic, I. Garcia-Etxebarria & J. Halverson,“On the computation of non-perturbative effective potentials in the string theory landscape: IIB/F-theory perspective”, Fortsch. Phys.59, 243 (2011),arXiv:1009.5386 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2011
[26]

Fast optimization algorithms and the cosmological constant

N. Bao, R. Bousso, S. Jordan & B. Lackey,“Fast optimization algorithms and the cosmological constant”, Phys. Rev. D96, 103512 (2017), arXiv:1706.08503 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2017
[27]

Computational Complexity of Vacua and Near-Vacua in Field and String Theory

J. Halverson & F. Ruehle,“Computational Complexity of Vacua and Near-Vacua in Field and String Theory”, Phys. Rev. D99, 046015 (2019),arXiv:1809.08279 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2019
[28]

K¨ ahler Moduli Stabilization and the Propagation of Decidability

J. Halverson, M. Plesser, F. Ruehle & J. Tian,“K¨ ahler Moduli Stabilization and the Propagation of Decidability”, Phys. Rev. D101, 046010 (2020), arXiv:1911.07835 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2020
[29]

Stationary universe

A. D. Linde & A. Mezhlumian,“Stationary universe”, Phys. Lett. B307, 25 (1993), gr-qc/9304015

work page arXiv 1993
[30]

From the Big Bang theory to the theory of a stationary universe

A. D. Linde, D. A. Linde & A. Mezhlumian,“From the Big Bang theory to the theory of a stationary universe”, Phys. Rev. D49, 1783 (1994),gr-qc/9306035

work page arXiv 1994
[31]

Probabilities in the infla- tionary multiverse

J. Garriga, D. Schwartz-Perlov, A. Vilenkin & S. Winitzki,“Probabilities in the infla- tionary multiverse”, JCAP01, 017 (2006),hep-th/0509184. 25

work page arXiv 2006
[32]

Eternal inflation and its implications

A. H. Guth,“Eternal inflation and its implications”, J. Phys. A40, 6811 (2007), hep-th/0702178

work page arXiv 2007
[33]

Making predictions in the multiverse

B. Freivogel,“Making predictions in the multiverse”, Class. Quant. Grav.28, 204007 (2011),arXiv:1105.0244 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2011
[34]

Machine-learning the string landscape

Y.-H. He,“Machine-learning the string landscape”, Phys. Lett. B774, 564 (2017)

2017
[35]

Evolving neural networks with genetic algorithms to study the String Land- scape

F. Ruehle,“Evolving neural networks with genetic algorithms to study the String Land- scape”, JHEP1708, 038 (2017),arXiv:1706.07024 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2017
[36]

Machine Learning of Calabi-Yau Volumes

D. Krefl & R.-K. Seong,“Machine Learning of Calabi-Yau Volumes”, Phys. Rev. D96, 066014 (2017),arXiv:1706.03346 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2017
[37]

Machine Learning in the String Landscape

J. Carifio, J. Halverson, D. Krioukov & B. D. Nelson,“Machine Learning in the String Landscape”, JHEP1709, 157 (2017),arXiv:1707.00655 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2017
[38]

Branes with Brains: Exploring String Vacua with Deep Reinforcement Learning

J. Halverson, B. Nelson & F. Ruehle,“Branes with Brains: Exploring String Vacua with Deep Reinforcement Learning”, JHEP1906, 003 (2019), arXiv:1903.11616 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2019
[39]

Searching the Landscape of Flux Vacua with Genetic Algorithms

A. Cole, A. Schachner & G. Shiu,“Searching the Landscape of Flux Vacua with Genetic Algorithms”, JHEP1911, 045 (2019),arXiv:1907.10072 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2019
[40]

Heterotic String Model Building with Monad Bundles and Reinforcement Learning

A. Constantin, T. R. Harvey & A. Lukas,“Heterotic String Model Building with Monad Bundles and Reinforcement Learning”, Fortsch. Phys.70, 2100186 (2022), arXiv:2108.07316 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2022
[41]

Evolving Heterotic Gauge Back- grounds: Genetic Algorithms versus Reinforcement Learning

S. Abel, A. Constantin, T. R. Harvey & A. Lukas,“Evolving Heterotic Gauge Back- grounds: Genetic Algorithms versus Reinforcement Learning”, Fortsch. Phys.70, 2200034 (2022),arXiv:2110.14029 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2022
[42]

Probing the Structure of String Theory Vacua with Genetic Algorithms and Reinforcement Learning

A. Cole, S. Krippendorf, A. Schachner & G. Shiu,“Probing the Structure of String Theory Vacua with Genetic Algorithms and Reinforcement Learning”, arXiv:2111.11466 [hep-th],https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.11466

work page arXiv
[43]

Decoding Nature with Nature’s Tools: Heterotic Line Bundle Models of Particle Physics with Genetic Algo- rithms and Quantum Annealing

S. A. Abel, A. Constantin, T. R. Harvey, A. Lukas & L. A. Nutricati,“Decoding Nature with Nature’s Tools: Heterotic Line Bundle Models of Particle Physics with Genetic Algo- rithms and Quantum Annealing”, Fortsch. Phys.72, 2300260 (2024), arXiv:2306.03147 [hep-th]. 26

work page arXiv 2024
[44]

Generating triangulations and fibrations with reinforcement learning

P. Berglund, G. Butbaia, Y.-H. He, E. Heyes, E. Hirst & V. Jejjala,“Generating triangulations and fibrations with reinforcement learning”, Phys. Lett. B860, 139158 (2025),arXiv:2405.21017 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2025
[45]

Computational complex- ity of the landscape II—Cosmological considerations

F. Denef, M. R. Douglas, B. Greene & C. Zukowski,“Computational complex- ity of the landscape II—Cosmological considerations”, Annals Phys.392, 93 (2018), arXiv:1706.06430 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2018
[46]

Vacuum Selection from Cosmology on Networks of String Geometries

J. Carifio, W. J. Cunningham, J. Halverson, D. Krioukov, C. Long & B. D. Nelson, “Vacuum Selection from Cosmology on Networks of String Geometries”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 101602 (2018),arXiv:1711.06685 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2018
[47]

Search Optimization, Funnel Topography, and Dynami- cal Criticality on the String Landscape

J. Khoury & O. Parrikar,“Search Optimization, Funnel Topography, and Dynami- cal Criticality on the String Landscape”, JCAP12, 014 (2019), arXiv:1907.07693 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2019
[48]

Accessibility Measure for Eternal Inflation: Dynamical Criticality and Higgs Metastability

J. Khoury,“Accessibility Measure for Eternal Inflation: Dynamical Criticality and Higgs Metastability”, JCAP06, 009 (2021),arXiv:1912.06706 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2021
[49]

The Self-Organized Critical Multiverse

G. Kartvelishvili, J. Khoury & A. Sharma,“The Self-Organized Critical Multiverse”, JCAP02, 028 (2021),arXiv:2003.12594 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2021
[50]

Bayesian reasoning in eternal inflation: A solution to the measure problem

J. Khoury & S. S. C. Wong,“Bayesian reasoning in eternal inflation: A solution to the measure problem”, Phys. Rev. D108, 023506 (2023),arXiv:2205.11524 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2023
[51]

Directed percolation criticality in eternal inflation

J. Khoury & S. S. C. Wong,“Directed percolation criticality in eternal inflation”, Phys. Rev. D108, 103541 (2023),arXiv:2308.09736 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2023
[52]

A local Wheeler-DeWitt measure for the string landscape

B. Hassfeld, A. Hebecker, M. Salmhofer, J. C. Strauss & J. Walcher,“A local Wheeler-DeWitt measure for the string landscape”, Nucl. Phys. B992, 116230 (2023), arXiv:2205.09772 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2023
[53]

End-of-the-world branes and inflationary pre- dictions for rocky and swampy landscapes

B. Hassfeld, A. Hebecker & A. Westphal,“End-of-the-world branes and inflationary pre- dictions for rocky and swampy landscapes”, JHEP2503, 196 (2025), arXiv:2411.11944 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2025
[54]

All Weight Systems for Calabi–Yau Fourfolds from Reflexive Polyhedra

F. Sch¨ oller & H. Skarke,“All Weight Systems for Calabi–Yau Fourfolds from Reflexive Polyhedra”, Commun. Math. Phys.372, 657 (2019),arXiv:1808.02422 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2019
[55]

Giant Leaps and Minimal Branes in Multi-Dimensional Flux Landscapes

A. R. Brown & A. Dahlen,“Giant Leaps and Minimal Branes in Multi-Dimensional Flux Landscapes”, Phys. Rev. D84, 023513 (2011),arXiv:1010.5241 [hep-th]. 27

work page arXiv 2011
[56]

Les Houches Lectures on Constructing String Vacua

F. Denef,“Les Houches Lectures on Constructing String Vacua”, Les Houches87, 483 (2008),arXiv:0803.1194 [hep-th]

work page Pith review arXiv 2008
[57]

de Sitter string vacua from supersymmetric D-terms

C. P. Burgess, R. Kallosh & F. Quevedo,“de Sitter string vacua from supersymmetric D-terms”, Journal of High Energy Physics2003, 056 (2003)

2003
[58]

Bijnens, J

S. Kachru, L. McAllister & R. Sundrum,“Sequestering in string theory”, Journal of High Energy Physics2007, 013–013 (2007), http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/ 2007/10/013

work page doi:10.1088/1126-6708/ 2007
[59]

Towards inflation in string theory

S. Kachru, R. Kallosh, A. D. Linde, J. M. Maldacena, L. P. McAllister & S. P. Trivedi, “Towards inflation in string theory”, JCAP10, 013 (2003),hep-th/0308055

work page arXiv 2003
[60]

Lattice points in high-dimensional spheres

J. E. Mazo & A. M. Odlyzko,“Lattice points in high-dimensional spheres”, Monatshefte f¨ ur Mathematik110, 47 (1990),https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01571276

work page doi:10.1007/bf01571276 1990
[61]

Wang, On the Elliptic Calabi-Yau Fourfold with Maximalh 1,1, JHEP05, 043, arXiv:2001.07258 [hep- th]

Y.-N. Wang,“On the Elliptic Calabi-Yau Fourfold with Maximal h1,1”, JHEP2005, 043 (2020),arXiv:2001.07258 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2020
[62]

Stability, Tunneling and Flux Changing de Sitter Transitions in the Large Volume String Scenario

S. de Alwis, R. Gupta, E. Hatefi & F. Quevedo,“Stability, Tunneling and Flux Changing de Sitter Transitions in the Large Volume String Scenario”, JHEP1311, 179 (2013), arXiv:1308.1222 [hep-th]. [54]“The On-line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences”,https://oeis.org

work page arXiv 2013
[63]

Lectures on Generalized Complex Geometry for Physicists

P. Koerber,“Lectures on Generalized Complex Geometry for Physicists”, Fortsch. Phys. 59, 169 (2011),arXiv:1006.1536 [hep-th]. 28

work page Pith review arXiv 2011