pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.05358 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-06 · 💻 cs.LG · cs.CV

Balancing Stability and Plasticity in Sequentially Trained Early-Exiting Neural Networks

Alaa Zniber , Ouassim Karrakchou , Mounir Ghogho This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 16:19 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.LG cs.CV
keywords early-exiting neural networkssequential trainingcontinual learningstability-plasticityElastic Weight ConsolidationLearning without Forgettingadaptive inference
0
0 comments X

The pith

Continual learning techniques prevent degradation when sequentially training early exits in neural networks.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Early-exiting neural networks insert classifiers at intermediate layers to let easy inputs finish computation early. Sequential addition of these exits often causes new training steps to interfere with and lower the accuracy of existing exits. The paper applies two continual learning strategies to this setting: Elastic Weight Consolidation protects parameters important to prior exits, while Learning without Forgetting maintains the output behavior of those exits. On standard benchmarks the resulting models show higher accuracy for early exits and faster inference when computation is limited. Readers would care because the approach makes it practical to build efficient adaptive networks without starting over each time an exit is added.

Core claim

The central discovery is that treating sequential exit training as a continual learning problem and using Elastic Weight Consolidation to safeguard critical weights together with Learning without Forgetting to retain prior output distributions allows new exits to specialize while preserving the performance of earlier ones.

What carries the argument

Elastic Weight Consolidation for parameter importance protection and Learning without Forgetting for output distribution preservation, used to balance stability and plasticity across sequentially added early exits.

If this is right

  • Higher accuracy is achieved at early exits compared to existing sequential training methods.
  • Significant performance speedups occur at low computational budgets.
  • These improvements are consistent across standard benchmarks for image classification.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • These regularization strategies might apply to other incremental additions in neural architectures, such as adding new task heads.
  • Deployed systems could update early-exiting models over time with less risk of losing prior efficiency gains.
  • The results suggest continual learning methods are robust enough for efficiency-focused training regimes.

Load-bearing premise

That the performance drop in sequential early-exit training stems mainly from interference between exits and that generic continual learning regularizers transfer effectively to this architecture without further tuning.

What would settle it

If experiments applying Elastic Weight Consolidation and Learning without Forgetting to sequential early-exit training on standard datasets show no increase in early-exit accuracy and no speedup gains over plain sequential training, the central claim would be falsified.

read the original abstract

Early-exiting neural networks enable adaptive inference by allowing inputs to exit at intermediate classifiers, reducing computation for easy samples while maintaining high accuracy. In practice, exits can be trained sequentially by incrementally adding them to a shared backbone; however, this sequential training can cause newly introduced exits to interfere with previously learned ones, degrading the performance of earlier classifiers. We address this problem by retaining the knowledge embedded in existing exits while allowing new ones to specialize. We propose two alternative approaches that operate at different levels of the model. The first constrains learning by protecting parameters that are important for previously trained exits, while the second preserves the output distributions of earlier exits as the network adapts. These alternatives directly reflect the stability-plasticity trade-off studied in continual learning. Accordingly, we leverage \textit{Elastic Weight Consolidation} to constrain critical weights and \textit{Learning without Forgetting} to preserve output distributions. Experiments on standard benchmarks show that our approaches consistently improve early-exit performance, achieving higher accuracy over existing sequential training methods and significant performance speedups at low computational budgets.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes applying Elastic Weight Consolidation (EWC) and Learning without Forgetting (LwF) from continual learning to sequentially trained early-exiting neural networks. The central claim is that these methods mitigate interference between exits by enforcing stability for prior exits while permitting plasticity for new ones, yielding higher accuracy and computational speedups on standard benchmarks relative to prior sequential training baselines.

Significance. If the empirical results hold under rigorous validation, the work offers a practical bridge between continual learning and early-exit architectures, addressing a real training challenge in adaptive inference. A strength is the direct, non-circular application of established CL regularizers (EWC for parameter protection and LwF for output preservation) without introducing new free parameters or invented entities. The framing of the stability-plasticity tension is internally consistent and aligns with the problem setup.

major comments (1)
  1. Experiments section: the central empirical claim of 'consistent improvements' and 'significant performance speedups' is load-bearing, yet the provided description (including the abstract) supplies no quantitative details on baselines, statistical significance tests, hyper-parameter sensitivity, or the precise experimental protocol. This leaves the strength of evidence for the transfer of standard CL methods to the early-exit setting only weakly supported.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback and the recommendation for minor revision. We address the single major comment below and will incorporate the suggested improvements to strengthen the empirical evidence.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Experiments section: the central empirical claim of 'consistent improvements' and 'significant performance speedups' is load-bearing, yet the provided description (including the abstract) supplies no quantitative details on baselines, statistical significance tests, hyper-parameter sensitivity, or the precise experimental protocol. This leaves the strength of evidence for the transfer of standard CL methods to the early-exit setting only weakly supported.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract omits specific numerical results for brevity and that the referee's point about strengthening the presentation of evidence is valid. The full manuscript's Experiments section (Section 4) already contains quantitative comparisons on CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, and ImageNet against sequential training baselines, reporting accuracy improvements and speedups at low compute budgets. However, to directly address the concern, we will revise the paper as follows: expand the abstract with key quantitative highlights; add a summary table of main results with means and standard deviations over multiple runs; include statistical significance testing (paired t-tests); provide hyper-parameter sensitivity plots for the EWC penalty and LwF distillation weight; and detail the experimental protocol (dataset splits, optimizer settings, baseline re-implementations, and early-exit thresholds). These changes will be made in the revised version without altering the core claims or methods. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; methods are direct adaptations of external continual-learning algorithms

full rationale

The paper's core contribution is the application of two off-the-shelf continual-learning algorithms (EWC and LwF) to mitigate interference when exits are added sequentially to an early-exit network. No equations, predictions, or uniqueness claims are derived within the paper; the stability-plasticity framing is explicitly imported from the continual-learning literature, and the experimental results are benchmark comparisons rather than self-referential fits. No self-citations appear in the provided text, and the central claim (improved accuracy and speedups) rests on external validation rather than any reduction to the paper's own inputs or definitions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Review performed on abstract only; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are stated beyond the standard hyper-parameters already present in EWC and LwF.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5491 in / 1013 out tokens · 41447 ms · 2026-05-08T16:19:37.983697+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

30 extracted references · 30 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    INTRODUCTION The increasing deployment of deep learning models under strict latency, energy, and memory constraints has motivated the development of resource-efficient dynamic architectures. Rather than executing a fixed computation graph for all in- puts, such architectures adapt their computational cost to in- put difficulty, enabling efficient inferenc...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  2. [2]

    ,Θµ} and produces class probability vectorˆ yµ (see Figure 1), with ˆyµ(c)(forc∈ {1,

    PROPOSED METHODOLOGY We consider an EENN consisting ofMICs, where each backbone subnetworkµis parameterized by{Θ 1, . . . ,Θµ} and produces class probability vectorˆ yµ (see Figure 1), with ˆyµ(c)(forc∈ {1, . . . , C}) being the probability associated with classc. We frame the sequential training of ICs as a sequence of learning tasks indexed byµ∈ {1,2, ....

    work page

  3. [3]

    EXPERIMENTS We evaluate our approach on standard early-exit benchmarks following the experimental setup proposed in [6]. Our evalua- tion focuses on comparing the proposed EWC and LwF regu- larization strategies against existing sequential training meth- ods across different architectures and computational budgets. 3.1. Experimental Setup Dataset.We condu...

    work page

  4. [4]

    and MSDNet [11]. For ResNet-34, we augment the standard architecture with 8 internal classifiers positioned at layers{2,4,· · ·,16}, where each exit consists of an SDN- type pooling [24], except for the last classifier, which uses an adaptive average pooling, followed by a linear classifier. For MSDNet, we employ the CIFAR variant with 7 blocks. Baselines...

    work page

  5. [5]

    and LwF (ρ= 0.5) reveals a systematic difference: LwF exits fewer samples at early classifiers under the same thresholds, while EWC commits earlier. Interpreted together with Figure 2, where LwF achieves higher accuracy at sub- stantially lower FLOPs, this shows that LwF provides a higher effective speedup despite exiting later on average. This be- havior...

    work page

  6. [6]

    CONCLUSION In this work, we propose a novel strategy for training EENNs to mitigate the degradation of previously learned representa- tions caused by incremental exit addition. By incorporating parameter-level protection via EWC and output-distribution consistency via LwF, we establish a principled sequential training framework that balances exit speciali...

    work page

  7. [7]

    Dynamic Neural Networks: A Survey,

    Yizeng Han, Gao Huang, Shiji Song, Le Yang, Honghui Wang, and Yulin Wang, “Dynamic Neural Networks: A Survey,”IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis & Machine Intelligence, vol. 44, no. 11, pp. 7436–7456, Nov. 2022

    work page 2022

  8. [8]

    Resource- constrained edge ai with early exit prediction,

    Rongkang Dong, Yuyi Mao, and Jun Zhang, “Resource- constrained edge ai with early exit prediction,”Journal of Com- munications and Information Networks, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 122–134, 2022

    work page 2022

  9. [9]

    Branchynet: Fast inference via early exiting from deep neural networks,

    Surat Teerapittayanon, Bradley McDanel, and H.T. Kung, “Branchynet: Fast inference via early exiting from deep neural networks,” in2016 23rd International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR), 2016, pp. 2464–2469

    work page 2016

  10. [10]

    Improving low-latency predictions in multi-exit neural networks via block-dependent losses,

    Dong-Jun Han, Jungwuk Park, Seokil Ham, Namjin Lee, and Jaekyun Moon, “Improving low-latency predictions in multi-exit neural networks via block-dependent losses,”IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, vol. 35, no. 11, pp. 16927–16935, 2024

    work page 2024

  11. [11]

    Deep feature surgery: To- wards accurate and efficient multi-exit networks,

    Cheng Gong, Yao Chen, Qiuyang Luo, Ye Lu, Tao Li, Yuzhi Zhang, Yufei Sun, and Le Zhang, “Deep feature surgery: To- wards accurate and efficient multi-exit networks,” inComputer Vision – ECCV 2024, Cham, 2025, pp. 435–451, Springer Nature Switzerland

    work page 2024

  12. [12]

    How to train your multi-exit model? analyzing the impact of training strategies,

    Piotr Kubaty, Bartosz W ´ojcik, Bartłomiej Tomasz Krzepkowski, Monika Michaluk, Tomasz Trzcinski, Jary Pomponi, and Kamil Adamczewski, “How to train your multi-exit model? analyzing the impact of training strategies,” inF orty-second International Conference on Machine Learning, 2025

    work page 2025

  13. [13]

    GAML- BERT: Improving BERT early exiting by gradient aligned mu- tual learning,

    Wei Zhu, Xiaoling Wang, Yuan Ni, and Guotong Xie, “GAML- BERT: Improving BERT early exiting by gradient aligned mu- tual learning,” inProceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empir- ical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Online and Punta Cana, Dominican Republic, Nov. 2021, pp. 3033–3044, Associa- tion for Computational Linguistics

    work page 2021

  14. [14]

    BERxiT: Early exiting for BERT with better fine-tuning and extension to re- gression,

    Ji Xin, Raphael Tang, Yaoliang Yu, and Jimmy Lin, “BERxiT: Early exiting for BERT with better fine-tuning and extension to re- gression,” inProceedings of the 16th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Main V olume, Online, Apr. 2021, pp. 91–104, Association for Compu- tational Linguistics

    work page 2021

  15. [15]

    Zero time waste in pre-trained early exit neural networks,

    Bartosz Wojcik, Marcin Przewiezlikowski, Filip Szatkowski, Ma- ciej Wolczyk, Klaudia Balazy, Bartlomiej Krzepkowski, Igor Podolak, Jacek Tabor, Marek Smieja, and Tomasz Trzcinski, “Zero time waste in pre-trained early exit neural networks,”Neu- ral Networks, vol. 168, pp. 580–601, 2023

    work page 2023

  16. [16]

    Lgvit: Dynamic early exiting for accelerating vision transformer,

    Guanyu Xu, Jiawei Hao, Li Shen, Han Hu, Yong Luo, Hui Lin, and Jialie Shen, “Lgvit: Dynamic early exiting for accelerating vision transformer,” inProceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Multimedia, New York, NY , USA, 2023, MM ’23, p. 9103–9114, Association for Computing Machinery

    work page 2023

  17. [17]

    Multi-scale dense networks for resource efficient image classification,

    Gao Huang, Danlu Chen, Tianhong Li, Felix Wu, Laurens van der Maaten, and Kilian Q. Weinberger, “Multi-scale dense networks for resource efficient image classification,” inProceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2018, pp. 284–293

    work page 2018

  18. [18]

    Early-exit deep neu- ral network - a comprehensive survey,

    Haseena Rahmath P, Vishal Srivastava, Kuldeep Chaurasia, Roberto G. Pacheco, and Rodrigo S. Couto, “Early-exit deep neu- ral network - a comprehensive survey,”ACM Comput. Surv., vol. 57, no. 3, Nov. 2024

    work page 2024

  19. [19]

    A com- prehensive survey of continual learning: Theory, method and ap- plication,

    Liyuan Wang, Xingxing Zhang, Hang Su, and Jun Zhu, “A com- prehensive survey of continual learning: Theory, method and ap- plication,”IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 46, no. 8, pp. 5362–5383, 2024

    work page 2024

  20. [20]

    Accelerated inference and reduced forgetting: The dual benefits of early-exit networks in continual learning,

    Filip Szatkowski, Fei Yang, Bartłomiej Twardowski, Tomasz Trzcinski, and Joost van de Weijer, “Accelerated inference and reduced forgetting: The dual benefits of early-exit networks in continual learning,” in5th Workshop on Continual Learning in Computer Vision, CVPR, Seattle, USA, June 2024

    work page 2024

  21. [21]

    DeeBERT: Dynamic early exiting for accelerating BERT infer- ence,

    Ji Xin, Raphael Tang, Jaejun Lee, Yaoliang Yu, and Jimmy Lin, “DeeBERT: Dynamic early exiting for accelerating BERT infer- ence,” inProceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Associa- tion for Computational Linguistics, Online, July 2020, pp. 2246– 2251, Association for Computational Linguistics

    work page 2020

  22. [22]

    FastBERT: a self-distilling BERT with adaptive in- ference time,

    Weijie Liu, Peng Zhou, Zhiruo Wang, Zhe Zhao, Haotang Deng, and Qi Ju, “FastBERT: a self-distilling BERT with adaptive in- ference time,” inProceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Online, July 2020, pp. 6035–6044, Association for Computational Linguistics

    work page 2020

  23. [23]

    Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networks,

    James Kirkpatrick, Razvan Pascanu, Neil Rabinowitz, Joel Ve- ness, Guillaume Desjardins, Andrei A. Rusu, Kieran Milan, John Quan, Tiago Ramalho, Agnieszka Grabska-Barwinska, Demis Hassabis, Claudia Clopath, Dharshan Kumaran, and Raia Had- sell, “Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networks,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 1...

    work page 2017

  24. [24]

    Progress & compress: A scalable framework for continual learning,

    Jonathan Schwarz, Wojciech Czarnecki, Jelena Luketina, Ag- nieszka Grabska-Barwinska, Yee Whye Teh, Razvan Pascanu, and Raia Hadsell, “Progress & compress: A scalable framework for continual learning,” inProceedings of the 35th International Con- ference on Machine Learning. 10–15 Jul 2018, vol. 80 ofProceed- ings of Machine Learning Research, pp. 4528–4537, PMLR

    work page 2018

  25. [25]

    Learning without forgetting,

    Zhizhong Li and Derek Hoiem, “Learning without forgetting,” IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., vol. 40, no. 12, pp. 2935–2947, Dec. 2018

    work page 2018

  26. [26]

    Natural gradient works efficiently in learning,

    Shun-ichi Amari, “Natural gradient works efficiently in learning,” Neural Computation, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 251–276, 1998

    work page 1998

  27. [27]

    On the computation of the fisher infor- mation in continual learning,

    Gido M. van de Ven, “On the computation of the fisher infor- mation in continual learning,” inICLR Blogposts 2025, 2025, https://iclr-blogposts.github.io/2025/blog/fisher/

    work page 2025

  28. [28]

    Learning multiple layers of features from tiny images,

    Alex Krizhevsky, “Learning multiple layers of features from tiny images,” Tech. Rep., University of Toronto, 2009

    work page 2009

  29. [29]

    Deep residual learning for image recognition,

    Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren, and Jian Sun, “Deep residual learning for image recognition,” inProceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2016, pp. 770–778

    work page 2016

  30. [30]

    Shallow- deep networks: Understanding and mitigating network overthink- ing,

    Yigitcan Kaya, Sanghyun Hong, and Tudor Dumitras, “Shallow- deep networks: Understanding and mitigating network overthink- ing,” inProceedings of the 36th International Conference on Ma- chine Learning. 09–15 Jun 2019, vol. 97 ofProceedings of Ma- chine Learning Research, pp. 3301–3310, PMLR

    work page 2019