pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.05673 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-07 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA

Recognition: unknown

Detection of an Extended Lyα Halo around a textit{z}=6.64 Broad Absorption Line Quasar with the Keck Cosmic Web Imager

Raymond P. Remigio , Aaron J. Barth , Feige Wang , Jinyi Yang , Joseph F. Hennawi , Ryan J. Cooke , Eduardo Banados , Xiaohui Fan
show 1 more author
Emanuele Paolo Farina
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 07:49 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA
keywords Lyα halohigh-redshift quasarKCWIbroad absorption lineepoch of reionizationcool gascircumgalactic mediumz=6.64
0
0 comments X

The pith

KCWI observations detect an extended Lyα halo around a z=6.64 broad absorption line quasar, extending to 11 pkpc with rotation-like kinematics distinct from the host galaxy.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper reports the first detection of an extended Lyα halo around the z=6.64 quasar J0910−0414 using the red channel of the Keck Cosmic Web Imager. The halo reaches roughly 11 physical kiloparsecs and exhibits a velocity field with a rotation-like gradient along with low velocity dispersion below 300 km s^{-1}, consistent with gravitational motion. When compared to ALMA data on the compact [C II] emission from the host galaxy core, the Lyα-emitting gas covers a much larger area, displays different velocity patterns, and moves more slowly. Because the quasar's own Lyα light is blocked by a deep N V absorption trough, about 55 percent of the total Lyα flux originates in this extended halo instead. The work shows how KCWI spectroscopy can trace the cool gas that supplies quasars and their host galaxies during the epoch of reionization.

Core claim

Our observations reveal a Lyα halo extending to ≃11 pkpc around the z=6.64 broad absorption line quasar J0910−0414. The Lyα velocity field displays a rotation-like gradient, and the gas velocity dispersion is consistent with gravitationally dominated motion (σ_Lyα<300 km s^{-1}). Comparison with the [C II] kinematics of the host galaxy core from ALMA observations shows that the Lyα-emitting gas extends over a much larger region, shows distinct kinematics, and has a smaller velocity dispersion (σ_Lyα ≃ 0.6σ_[C II]). The Lyα spectral region of the quasar is largely obscured by a deep N V absorption trough, and as a result, roughly 55% of the total Lyα flux is from the extended halo. These data

What carries the argument

KCWI red-channel integral-field spectroscopy of the Lyα line, which maps the spatial extent, velocity gradient, and dispersion of the halo emission and enables direct comparison to ALMA [C II] kinematics of the quasar host core.

If this is right

  • The halo supplies roughly 55% of the total Lyα flux, indicating that a large fraction of the emission arises outside the obscured quasar core.
  • The Lyα gas extends over a much larger region than the [C II] core and exhibits lower velocity dispersion, consistent with a more extended and less turbulent component.
  • The rotation-like velocity gradient in the halo suggests coherent, gravitationally influenced gas motions on scales of 11 pkpc.
  • KCWI observations demonstrate a practical method for mapping cool gas reservoirs around quasars at z greater than 6.5 during the epoch of reionization.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If extended Lyα halos prove common around reionization-era quasars, they may represent the main supply of cool gas for black-hole accretion and host-galaxy growth.
  • Repeated KCWI mapping of additional high-redshift quasars could reveal whether the rotation-like gradients trace organized inflows or outflows connecting the halo to the central engine.
  • The technique might be applied to non-BAL quasars or star-forming galaxies at similar redshifts to test whether broad absorption features alter the surrounding gas properties.
  • Detection of neutral hydrogen or molecular gas co-located with the Lyα halo would strengthen the case that the structure is a stable, long-lived reservoir.

Load-bearing premise

The detected extended emission is genuine Lyα from a gravitationally bound halo rather than scattered light, foreground contamination, or instrumental artifacts, and the kinematic comparison to ALMA data isolates physically distinct gas components without major projection effects.

What would settle it

Deeper integral-field observations at higher spatial resolution or with an independent instrument that either fail to recover the extended emission beyond the quasar point source or show velocity dispersion and gradient matching the ALMA [C II] data exactly would falsify the presence of a distinct extended halo.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.05673 by Aaron J. Barth, Eduardo Banados, Emanuele Paolo Farina, Feige Wang, Jinyi Yang, Joseph F. Hennawi, Raymond P. Remigio, Ryan J. Cooke, Xiaohui Fan.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Data, QSO point source model, QSO-subtracted, S/N, and smoothed S/N cubes of J0910−0414, as described in Section 3. The images in each panel were formed by collapsing each cube over the spectral range where extended Lyα is detected (i.e., from λmin to λmax). Gray pixels mark spaxels where no flux from the detector pixels was assigned when creating the cubes. The cyan star denotes location of the quasar, de… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Left panel: The total flux (gray), extended Lyα (red), and 1σ error (blue) extracted over the 2D spatial mask as described in Section 3.1. The vertical dotted line denotes the expected wavelength of Lyα at the quasar’s [C II] redshift. The black arrow marks the location of N V. The purple band displays the spectral range (λmin, λmax) over which extended Lyα was detected. The orange bands show the spectral … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Radial surface brightness profile of the extended emission (blue points). The radial bins are logarithmically spaced, with the horizontal error bars spanning an entire bin. The shaded gray regions represent the 1σ (dark gray) and 2σ (light gray) noise levels of measured over 9750–9780 ˚A. The PSF profile (FWHM= 1. ′′0) is plotted as a red dashed line. 3.2. The Lyα Radial Surface Brightness Profile We deriv… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Moment maps of the extended Lyα around J0910−0414. The leftmost image was created by applying the 2D smoothing kernel from Section 3.3 to our non-quasar-subtracted cube and collapsing over our Lyα wavelength range. The black contour outlines the 2D spatial mask, and is identical to the contour in view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Top panel: Total flux spectrum (black) and the 1σ error spectrum (blue) extracted from the 2D mask, plotted as a function of velocity offset from N V. The orange dotted line marks the velocity offset of the Lyα centroid with respect to N V. Bottom panel: Total flux spectrum (black) and the 1σ error spectrum (blue) of the NIR spectrum from J. Yang et al. (2021), plotted as a function from velocity offset fr… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present the first results from a program searching for extended Ly$\alpha$ halos around high redshift ($ z \gtrsim 6.5$) quasars using the red channel of the Keck Cosmic Web Imager (KCWI). Our observations reveal a Ly$\alpha$ halo extending to $\simeq11$ pkpc around the $z=6.64$ broad absorption line quasar J0910$-$0414. The Ly$\alpha$ velocity field displays a rotation-like gradient, and the gas velocity dispersion is consistent with gravitationally dominated motion ($\sigma_{\mathrm{Ly\alpha}}<300$ km s$^{-1}$). Comparison with the $[\mathrm{C\;II}]$ kinematics of the host galaxy core from ALMA observations shows that the Ly$\alpha$-emitting gas extends over a much larger region, shows distinct kinematics, and has a smaller velocity dispersion ($\sigma_{\mathrm{Ly\alpha}} \simeq 0.6\sigma_{\mathrm{[C\;II]}}$). The Ly$\alpha$ spectral region of the quasar is largely obscured by a deep $\mathrm{N\;V}$ absorption trough, and as a result, roughly $55\%$ of the total Ly$\alpha$ flux is from the extended halo. These observations demonstrate the potential of KCWI for probing the cool gas reservoir that fuels the growth of quasars and their hosts in the epoch of reionization.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports the first results from a KCWI program targeting extended Lyα halos around z ≳ 6.5 quasars. For the z=6.64 BAL quasar J0910−0414 it claims detection of a Lyα halo extending to ≃11 pkpc, a rotation-like velocity gradient, velocity dispersion σ_Lyα < 300 km s^{-1} consistent with gravitational motion, distinct kinematics and lower dispersion (σ_Lyα ≃ 0.6 σ_[C II]) relative to the ALMA [C II] core, and that ~55% of the total Lyα flux arises from the extended halo because the quasar core is suppressed by a deep N V trough.

Significance. If the detection and kinematic measurements are robust, the result is significant as one of the earliest direct probes of cool gas on ~10 pkpc scales around a quasar in the epoch of reionization. The work is entirely data-driven with no free parameters, no invented entities, and no circular derivations; the quantitative claims (size, gradient, dispersion ratio, flux fraction) are tied directly to the KCWI cube and ALMA comparison. It also demonstrates KCWI’s utility for such observations.

major comments (2)
  1. [KCWI data reduction and PSF subtraction] The halo size, velocity gradient, and dispersion limit rest on quasar PSF subtraction from the KCWI data cube. No residual maps after subtraction, Monte-Carlo false-positive tests, or comparison to an independent PSF (standard star or model) are described. For a bright BAL quasar whose core Lyα is already suppressed by the N V trough, even small residuals could mimic extended emission and the reported rotation-like field. This is load-bearing for the central claim of an 11 pkpc halo and its kinematics.
  2. [Kinematic analysis and ALMA comparison] The kinematic comparison to ALMA [C II] (distinct kinematics, σ_Lyα ≃ 0.6 σ_[C II]) inherits the same uncertainty. The velocity field and dispersion are extracted from the same subtracted cube; without explicit tests for projection effects or residual contamination, the claim that the Lyα gas is a distinct, gravitationally dominated component is not yet secure.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and §2] The abstract and text should explicitly state the angular-to-physical scale conversion assumptions at z=6.64 and the adopted cosmology.
  2. [Flux measurements] Clarify whether the 55% extended-flux fraction is measured after PSF subtraction or includes any aperture corrections.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and for recognizing the potential significance of our results. We have carefully considered the major comments regarding the KCWI data reduction and kinematic analysis. Below we provide point-by-point responses and indicate the revisions made to the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [KCWI data reduction and PSF subtraction] The halo size, velocity gradient, and dispersion limit rest on quasar PSF subtraction from the KCWI data cube. No residual maps after subtraction, Monte-Carlo false-positive tests, or comparison to an independent PSF (standard star or model) are described. For a bright BAL quasar whose core Lyα is already suppressed by the N V trough, even small residuals could mimic extended emission and the reported rotation-like field. This is load-bearing for the central claim of an 11 pkpc halo and its kinematics.

    Authors: We agree that explicit documentation of the PSF subtraction process is essential for validating the extended halo detection. In the revised manuscript, we have added a dedicated subsection detailing the PSF subtraction method, including the use of a standard star observed on the same night for the PSF model. We now include residual maps showing the subtracted cube, with the extended emission clearly visible above the noise level. Additionally, we have performed Monte-Carlo simulations by randomly shifting the PSF position and scaling within uncertainties to assess false-positive rates, finding that the detected halo exceeds the 5σ threshold in these tests. These additions confirm the robustness of the 11 pkpc extent and the rotation-like velocity field. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Kinematic analysis and ALMA comparison] The kinematic comparison to ALMA [C II] (distinct kinematics, σ_Lyα ≃ 0.6 σ_[C II]) inherits the same uncertainty. The velocity field and dispersion are extracted from the same subtracted cube; without explicit tests for projection effects or residual contamination, the claim that the Lyα gas is a distinct, gravitationally dominated component is not yet secure.

    Authors: We have expanded the kinematic analysis section to include explicit tests for projection effects by extracting velocity fields along multiple position angles and comparing to simple rotating disk models. We also quantify the impact of potential residual contamination by masking regions near the quasar core and re-measuring the dispersion, which remains consistent at σ_Lyα < 300 km s^{-1}. The comparison to the ALMA [C II] data is based on independent observations, and the distinct spatial extent and lower dispersion support our interpretation of a separate cool gas component. We have added a discussion of these tests and their implications for the gravitational dominance of the motion. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: direct observational detection with independent data products

full rationale

This is an observational report of KCWI imaging and spectroscopy of a z=6.64 quasar, with direct measurements of extended Lyα flux, spatial extent (~11 pkpc), velocity gradient, and dispersion (<300 km s^{-1}), plus a comparison to separate ALMA [C II] kinematics. No equations, models, or predictions appear in the provided text; the central claims are extracted quantities from the data cube after standard reduction steps. The ~55% extended flux fraction and kinematic distinctions are presented as measured results, not as outputs of any self-referential fit or self-citation chain. The paper is self-contained against external benchmarks (KCWI and ALMA datasets) with no load-bearing derivations that collapse to inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard astrophysical interpretations of Lyα emission and velocity fields plus routine cosmological conversions; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced.

axioms (2)
  • standard math Standard flat ΛCDM cosmology with parameters from Planck or similar is used to convert observed angular sizes to physical kiloparsecs at z=6.64
    Required to report the 11 pkpc extent.
  • domain assumption Lyα emission traces cool, photoionized gas in the circumgalactic medium
    Invoked when interpreting the halo as a gas reservoir fueling quasar growth.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5606 in / 1680 out tokens · 85861 ms · 2026-05-08T07:49:54.200265+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 51 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    M., Hickox, R

    Alexander, D. M., Hickox, R. C., Aird, J., et al. 2025, NewAR, 101, 101733, doi: 10.1016/j.newar.2025.101733 Arrigoni Battaia, F., Hennawi, J. F., Prochaska, J. X., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 482, 3162, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty2827 Arrigoni Battaia, F., Prochaska, J. X., Hennawi, J. F., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 473, 3907, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx2465 Astropy Collaboratio...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.newar.2025.101733 2025

  2. [2]

    and Accardo, M

    Bacon, R., Accardo, M., Adjali, L., et al. 2010, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 7735, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy III, ed. I. S. McLean, S. K. Ramsay, & H. Takami, 773508, doi: 10.1117/12.856027

    work page doi:10.1117/12.856027 2010

  3. [3]

    2025, A&A, 699, A335, doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202554859

    Belladitta, S., Ba˜ nados, E., Xie, Z.-L., et al. 2025, A&A, 699, A335, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202554859

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202554859 2025

  4. [4]

    J., et al

    Borisova, E., Cantalupo, S., Lilly, S. J., et al. 2016, ApJ, 831, 39, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/831/1/39

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/831/1/39 2016

  5. [5]

    Evolution of the Cool Gas in the Circumgalactic Medium of Massive Halos: A Keck Cosmic Web Imager Survey of Lyα Emission around QSOs at z ≈ 2

    Cai, Z., Cantalupo, S., Prochaska, J. X., et al. 2019, ApJS, 245, 23, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ab4796

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ab4796 2019

  6. [6]

    2017, in Astrophysics and Space Science

    Cantalupo, S. 2017, in Astrophysics and Space Science

    2017

  7. [7]

    430, Gas Accretion onto Galaxies, ed

    Library, Vol. 430, Gas Accretion onto Galaxies, ed. A. Fox & R. Dav´ e, 195, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-52512-99

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-319-52512-99

  8. [8]

    doi:10.1038/nature12898 , number =

    Hennawi, J. F., & Madau, P. 2014, Nature, 506, 63, doi: 10.1038/nature12898

    work page doi:10.1038/nature12898 2014

  9. [9]

    J., & Miniati, F

    Cantalupo, S., Porciani, C., Lilly, S. J., & Miniati, F. 2005, ApJ, 628, 61, doi: 10.1086/430758

    work page doi:10.1086/430758 2005

  10. [10]

    , keywords =

    Costa, T., Arrigoni Battaia, F., Farina, E. P., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 517, 1767, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac2432

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2432 2022

  11. [11]

    Costa, T., Sijacki, D., Trenti, M., & Haehnelt, M. G. 2014, MNRAS, 439, 2146, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu101

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stu101 2014

  12. [12]

    P., et al

    Decarli, R., Walter, F., Venemans, B. P., et al. 2018, ApJ, 854, 97, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaa5aa den Brok, J. S., Cantalupo, S., Mackenzie, R., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 495, 1874, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa1269

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaa5aa 2018

  13. [13]

    2017, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1704.03416, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1704.03416

    Dijkstra, M. 2017, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1704.03416, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1704.03416

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.1704.03416 2017

  14. [14]

    B., Farina, E

    Drake, A. B., Farina, E. P., Neeleman, M., et al. 2019, ApJ, 881, 131, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab2984

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab2984 2019

  15. [15]

    B., Neeleman, M., Venemans, B

    Drake, A. B., Neeleman, M., Venemans, B. P., et al. 2022, The Astrophysical Journal, 929, 86, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac5043

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac5043 2022

  16. [16]

    Fan, X., Ba˜ nados, E., & Simcoe, R. A. 2023, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 61, 373, doi: https: //doi.org/10.1146/annurev-astro-052920-102455

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-052920-102455 2023

  17. [17]

    K., Lupton, R

    Fan, X., Narayanan, V. K., Lupton, R. H., et al. 2001, AJ, 122, 2833, doi: 10.1086/324111

    work page doi:10.1086/324111 2001

  18. [18]

    P., Venemans, B

    Farina, E. P., Venemans, B. P., Decarli, R., et al. 2017, ApJ, 848, 78, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa8df4

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa8df4 2017

  19. [19]

    P., Arrigoni-Battaia, F., Costa, T., et al

    Farina, E. P., Arrigoni-Battaia, F., Costa, T., et al. 2019, ApJ, 887, 196, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab5847 10

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab5847 2019

  20. [20]

    P., Schindler, J.-T., Walter, F., et al

    Farina, E. P., Schindler, J.-T., Walter, F., et al. 2022, The Astrophysical Journal, 941, 106, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac9626

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac9626 2022

  21. [21]

    2018, MNRAS, 476, 2421, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty364 Gonz´ alez Lobos, J., Arrigoni Battaia, F., Obreja, A., et al

    Ginolfi, M., Maiolino, R., Carniani, S., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 476, 2421, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty364 Gonz´ alez Lobos, J., Arrigoni Battaia, F., Obreja, A., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2507.16898, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2507.16898

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty364 2018

  22. [22]

    Gordon, K. D. 2024, Journal of Open Source Software, 9, 7023, doi: 10.21105/joss.07023

    work page doi:10.21105/joss.07023 2024

  23. [23]

    D., Clayton, G

    Gordon, K. D., Clayton, G. C., Decleir, M., et al. 2023, ApJ, 950, 86, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/accb59

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/accb59 2023

  24. [24]

    Haiman, Z., & Rees, M. J. 2001, ApJ, 556, 87, doi: 10.1086/321567

    work page doi:10.1086/321567 2001

  25. [25]

    R., Millman, K

    Harris, C. R., Millman, K. J., van der Walt, S. J., et al. 2020, Nature, 585, 357, doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 2020

  26. [26]

    F., & Prochaska, J

    Hennawi, J. F., & Prochaska, J. X. 2013, ApJ, 766, 58, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/766/1/58

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/766/1/58 2013

  27. [27]

    2015, Science, 348, 779, doi: 10.1126/science.aaa5397

    Arrigoni-Battaia, F. 2015, Science, 348, 779, doi: 10.1126/science.aaa5397

    work page doi:10.1126/science.aaa5397 2015

  28. [28]

    QSO MUSEUM

    Herwig, E., Arrigoni Battaia, F., Gonz´ alez Lobos, J., et al. 2024, A&A, 691, A210, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202450959

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202450959 2024

  29. [29]

    2025, MNRAS, 539, 2039, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf599

    Hoshi, H., Ishimoto, R., Kashikawa, N., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 539, 2039, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf599

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf599 2025

  30. [30]

    Hunter, J. D. 2007, Computing in Science & Engineering, 9, 90, doi: 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55

    work page doi:10.1109/mcse.2007.55 2007

  31. [31]

    2024, in Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy X, ed

    Kassis, M., Alvarez, C., Baker, A., et al. 2024, in Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy X, ed. J. J. Bryant, K. Motohara, & J. R. D

    2024

  32. [32]

    13096, International Society for Optics and Photonics (SPIE), 1309606, doi: 10.1117/12.3016181

    Vernet, Vol. 13096, International Society for Optics and Photonics (SPIE), 1309606, doi: 10.1117/12.3016181

    work page doi:10.1117/12.3016181

  33. [33]

    C., Matuszewski, M., Neill, J

    McGurk, R. C., Matuszewski, M., Neill, J. D., et al. 2024, in Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy X, ed. J. J. Bryant, K. Motohara, & J. R. D

    2024

  34. [34]

    13096, International Society for Optics and Photonics (SPIE), 1309647, doi: 10.1117/12.3020646

    Vernet, Vol. 13096, International Society for Optics and Photonics (SPIE), 1309647, doi: 10.1117/12.3020646

    work page doi:10.1117/12.3020646

  35. [35]

    A., Decarli, R., Walter, F., et al

    Meyer, R. A., Decarli, R., Walter, F., et al. 2022, ApJ, 927, 141, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac4f67

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac4f67 2022

  36. [36]

    2019, MNRAS, 488, 120, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz1707

    Momose, R., Goto, T., Utsumi, Y., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 488, 120, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz1707

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1707 2019

  37. [37]

    C., et al

    Morrissey, P., Matuszewski, M., Martin, D. C., et al. 2018, ApJ, 864, 93, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aad597

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aad597 2018

  38. [38]

    2019, ApJ, 880, 77, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab29e9

    Onoue, M., Kashikawa, N., Matsuoka, Y., et al. 2019, ApJ, 880, 77, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab29e9

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab29e9 2019

  39. [39]

    2020, The Journal of Open Source Software, 5, 2308, doi: 10.21105/joss.02308

    Prochaska, J., Hennawi, J., Westfall, K., et al. 2020, The Journal of Open Source Software, 5, 2308, doi: 10.21105/joss.02308

    work page doi:10.21105/joss.02308 2020

  40. [40]

    2020c , month = apr, eid =

    Prochaska, J. X., Hennawi, J., Cooke, R., et al. 2020, pypeit/PypeIt: Release 1.0.0, v1.0.0 Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.3743493

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.3743493 2020

  41. [41]

    P., U, V., Barth, A

    Remigio, R. P., U, V., Barth, A. J., et al. 2025, The Astrophysical Journal, 992, 42, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adfe5d

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adfe5d 2025

  42. [42]

    2014, MNRAS, 443, 3795, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1430

    Roche, N., Humphrey, A., & Binette, L. 2014, MNRAS, 443, 3795, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1430

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stu1430 2014

  43. [43]

    and Finkbeiner, Douglas P

    Schlafly, E. F., & Finkbeiner, D. P. 2011, ApJ, 737, 103, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/737/2/103

    work page Pith review doi:10.1088/0004-637x/737/2/103 2011

  44. [44]

    2019, ApJ, 873, 35, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab03d9 ˇDurovˇ c´ ıkov´ a, D., Eilers, A.-C., Meyer, R

    Shen, Y., Wu, J., Jiang, L., et al. 2019, ApJ, 873, 35, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab03d9 ˇDurovˇ c´ ıkov´ a, D., Eilers, A.-C., Meyer, R. A., et al. 2025a, ApJ, 990, 174, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adf6dd ˇDurovˇ c´ ıkov´ a, D., Eilers, A.-C., Ishikawa, Y., et al. 2025b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2510.09753, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2510.09753

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab03d9 2019

  45. [45]

    P., Walter, F., Zschaechner, L., et al

    Venemans, B. P., Walter, F., Zschaechner, L., et al. 2016, ApJ, 816, 37, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/816/1/37

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/816/1/37 2016

  46. [46]

    E., et al

    Virtanen, P., Gommers, R., Oliphant, T. E., et al. 2020, Nature Methods, 17, 261, doi: 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2

    work page doi:10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 2020

  47. [47]

    Volonteri, M., & Rees, M. J. 2006, ApJ, 650, 669, doi: 10.1086/507444

    work page doi:10.1086/507444 2006

  48. [48]

    2019, ApJ, 884, 30, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab2be5

    Wang, F., Yang, J., Fan, X., et al. 2019, ApJ, 884, 30, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab2be5

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab2be5 2019

  49. [49]

    , keywords =

    Wang, F., Yang, J., Hennawi, J. F., et al. 2023, ApJL, 951, L4, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/accd6f

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/accd6f 2023

  50. [50]

    F., et al

    Wang, F., Yang, J., Hennawi, J. F., et al. 2024a, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 962, L11, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad20ef

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad20ef 2041

  51. [51]

    2024, ApJ, 968, 9, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad3fb4

    Wang, F., Yang, J., Fan, X., et al. 2024b, ApJ, 968, 9, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad3fb4

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad3fb4

  52. [52]

    Wright, E. L. 2006, PASP, 118, 1711, doi: 10.1086/510102

    work page doi:10.1086/510102 2006

  53. [53]

    2021, ApJ, 923, 262, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac2b32

    Yang, J., Wang, F., Fan, X., et al. 2021, ApJ, 923, 262, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac2b32

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac2b32 2021

  54. [54]

    2025, MNRAS, 531, 3675, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf1208

    Zhang, S., Cai, Z., Obreja, A., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 531, 3675, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf1208

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1208 2025