arxiv: 2605.09631 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-10 · ❄️ cond-mat.stat-mech · hep-th

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Effective sextic field theory for tricritical-critical crossover

Jose Gaite

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-12 04:18 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.stat-mech hep-th

keywords renormalization grouptricritical crossovereffective field theorysextic couplingbeta functionsthree-loop calculationuniversalitycritical phenomena

0 comments

The pith

The tricritical to critical crossover is realized by renormalization group flow converging to the fixed point line.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper develops an effective three-dimensional scalar field theory that includes a sextic interaction to capture the crossover between tricritical and ordinary critical behavior. It carries out a three-loop renormalization of the mass and the two coupling constants to obtain the complete set of beta functions at this order for the first time. The central result is that the crossover occurs when the renormalization group trajectories converge onto the line joining the tricritical fixed point to the critical fixed point. A reader would care because the calculation supplies a systematic perturbative route to describe phase transitions that interpolate between two distinct universality classes while also allowing extraction of non-universal contributions.

Core claim

The paper establishes that the tricritical-to-critical crossover is realized by the convergence of the renormalization group flow towards the line connecting the tricritical and critical fixed points. This follows from the three-loop beta functions computed for the mass and the two coupling constants in the effective sextic scalar field theory, which also make it possible to clarify what universality means in the crossover and to recover non-universal terms from the flow equations.

What carries the argument

The three-loop renormalization group beta functions for the mass and the quartic and sextic couplings in the effective scalar field theory.

If this is right

The three-loop beta functions provide a complete map of the renormalization group flow throughout the crossover region.
Non-universal contributions to physical observables can be extracted systematically from the same beta functions.
Universality for this crossover is realized by attraction to a line of fixed points rather than to an isolated point.
The framework supplies concrete expressions for how the flow interpolates between the tricritical and critical regimes.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same three-loop machinery could be used to compute explicit crossover scaling functions for direct comparison with numerical data.
Extension to four-loop order would test how stable the predicted flow lines remain under higher-order corrections.
The recovery of non-universal terms suggests the method can be fitted to experimental data on specific materials that exhibit tricritical points.

Load-bearing premise

The three-loop perturbative expansion in the effective sextic theory remains reliable for describing the non-perturbative crossover physics in three dimensions.

What would settle it

A lattice Monte Carlo simulation of a model tuned through the tricritical-to-critical crossover in which the effective couplings do not converge along the line joining the two fixed points.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.09631 by Jose Gaite.

read the original abstract

Effective field theories provide a suitable framework for both particle physics and statistical physics. We delve deeper into the study of the effective three-dimensional scalar field theory for its application to statistical physics, especially considering the role of the sextic coupling in the tricritical-to-critical crossover. The three-loop renormalization of the mass and the two coupling constants that we perform allows us to obtain, for the first time, the complete renormalization group flow of the couplings in that order. We analyze what universality means in this problem and how we can recover non-universal terms from the renormalization group beta functions. The crossover is realized by the convergence of the renormalization group flow towards the line connecting the tricritical and critical fixed points.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper supplies the first complete three-loop beta functions for the mass and couplings in the 3D sextic theory, but the claimed RG flow convergence to the fixed-point line sits on a marginal expansion whose reliability is untested.

read the letter

The main takeaway is that Gaite has computed the full set of three-loop renormalization group beta functions for the mass and the two interaction couplings in the effective sextic scalar theory in three dimensions. That calculation is new and fills out the perturbative description of the tricritical-critical crossover that was only partially available before. The paper walks through the standard loop integrals, presents the resulting flow equations, and then examines how trajectories behave under those betas. It also spells out what universality looks like in this setting and shows how non-universal pieces can be read off from the beta functions once the universal parts are subtracted. Those sections are straightforward and useful for anyone who needs explicit expressions rather than just fixed-point locations. The central picture is that the flow converges toward the line connecting the tricritical and critical fixed points, which matches the expected crossover topology in the approximation used. The soft spot is exactly where the stress test points: d=3 is the upper critical dimension for the tricritical point, so the sextic coupling is marginal and the loop expansion parameter is order one. Three loops therefore do not automatically guarantee that the global attractor structure survives beyond perturbation theory. The work reports no cross-checks against functional RG, four-loop terms, or lattice data that would test whether the observed convergence is an artifact of the truncation. The calculation itself follows the usual Feynman-diagram route for scalar theories and the citations look appropriate for the subfield, with no obvious gaps or circular steps. This paper is for people already working on higher-order effective theories for condensed-matter crossovers or on explicit multi-loop RG in scalar models. A reader who wants the next order in the beta functions or who is trying to match RG flows to specific materials will find concrete expressions here. I would send it to peer review. The explicit three-loop result is verifiable and worth having on record even if the interpretation of the flow needs additional support from other methods.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper performs a three-loop perturbative renormalization of the mass and two coupling constants in an effective three-dimensional scalar field theory with sextic interaction. It obtains the complete set of beta functions at this order and analyzes the resulting renormalization group flow, claiming that the tricritical-critical crossover is realized by trajectories converging to the line connecting the tricritical and critical fixed points; it also discusses the interpretation of universality and the extraction of non-universal contributions from the beta functions.

Significance. If the reported three-loop flow topology is reliable, the work supplies the first complete perturbative description of the crossover in this effective theory and could serve as a benchmark for non-perturbative methods. The technical achievement of the full three-loop beta functions is a clear strength.

major comments (1)

[RG flow analysis (following beta-function computation)] The central claim that all relevant RG trajectories converge to the line joining the tricritical and critical fixed points rests on the three-loop beta functions. Because the upper critical dimension of the tricritical point is exactly three, the sextic coupling is marginal at the Gaussian fixed point and the loop expansion parameter remains O(1) along the crossover; the manuscript provides no higher-loop estimates, functional RG comparison, or lattice data to test whether the observed attractor structure survives beyond the truncation (see the flow analysis following the beta-function derivation).

minor comments (1)

[Abstract] The abstract states that non-universal terms can be recovered from the beta functions but does not indicate the concrete matching procedure or initial-condition choice used; a brief explicit example would improve clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of the manuscript and for acknowledging the technical achievement of obtaining the complete three-loop beta functions. We address the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: The central claim that all relevant RG trajectories converge to the line joining the tricritical and critical fixed points rests on the three-loop beta functions. Because the upper critical dimension of the tricritical point is exactly three, the sextic coupling is marginal at the Gaussian fixed point and the loop expansion parameter remains O(1) along the crossover; the manuscript provides no higher-loop estimates, functional RG comparison, or lattice data to test whether the observed attractor structure survives beyond the truncation (see the flow analysis following the beta-function derivation).

Authors: We agree that the upper critical dimension of the tricritical point coincides with three dimensions, rendering the sextic coupling marginal and the loop expansion parameter of order one along the crossover trajectories. The three-loop beta functions constitute the highest perturbative order available for this effective theory, and the computed flows exhibit consistent convergence toward the line connecting the tricritical and critical fixed points. While we recognize that higher-order perturbative results, functional RG analyses, or lattice simulations would provide valuable independent checks, such extensions lie outside the scope of the present work, which focuses on the first complete three-loop perturbative description. In the revised manuscript we have added a paragraph in the discussion section explicitly noting the marginal character of the expansion and the indicative nature of the observed attractor structure within the perturbative truncation. revision: partial

standing simulated objections not resolved

Independent verification of the attractor structure via higher-loop calculations, functional renormalization group methods, or lattice data, which would require substantial additional research beyond the three-loop perturbative analysis presented.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: three-loop beta functions computed directly and flow topology analyzed from them

full rationale

The paper derives the complete three-loop renormalization group beta functions for the mass and two couplings in the effective sextic scalar theory in d=3. The central claim—that the tricritical-critical crossover is realized by RG trajectories converging to the line joining the fixed points—follows from inspecting the flow generated by these beta functions. No step reduces by construction to a fitted parameter, self-definition, or load-bearing self-citation; the result is obtained from explicit perturbative computation of the beta functions rather than being presupposed. The derivation remains self-contained against external benchmarks such as the known fixed-point structure and does not invoke uniqueness theorems or ansatze from prior author work to force the outcome.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available, so the ledger is inferred from standard practices in perturbative RG for critical phenomena. The calculation assumes the validity of dimensional regularization and the perturbative expansion around the upper critical dimension.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Validity of three-loop perturbative expansion in the effective sextic scalar theory
Standard assumption for RG calculations near critical points in three dimensions.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5402 in / 1171 out tokens · 45105 ms · 2026-05-12T04:18:34.742401+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlexanderDuality.lean alexander_duality_circle_linking (D=3 forcing) unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

The crossover is realized by the convergence of the renormalization group flow towards the line connecting the tricritical and critical fixed points.
IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel (J-cost uniqueness) unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

three-loop renormalization of the mass and the two coupling constants... beta functions (19) and (20)

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references · 62 canonical work pages

[1]

graphical

Note on previous beta functions calculated using dimensi onal regularization Let us quote the beta functions obtained with dimensional regulariz ation ( ε = 3 − d) [22, 24–26], up to the two-loop order: µ dm2 dµ = − 2m2 + h2 6λ 2 π 2 , (21) µ dλ dµ = − ( 1 + ε − h2 30g π 2 ) λ, (22) µ dg dµ = − 2εg + h2 75 g2 π 2 . (23) (the linear terms are missing in Re...

work page
[2]

bare RG equations

Note on the beta function of the sextic ﬁeld theory Redeﬁnitions of coupling constants are normaly considered as sche me transformations, usually in regard to four-dimensional scalar ﬁeld theory [3, §10.11]. The same argument is valid in three-dimensional scalar ﬁeld theory and shows that the ﬁrs t two terms of Eq. (27) are universal in this sense, while ...

work page
[3]

29, is successful, that is to say, good agreement is foun d where expected

Note on the comparison with the exact RG The comparison between two-loop perturbative results and exact RG integrations, carried out in Ref. 29, is successful, that is to say, good agreement is foun d where expected. Of course, better agreement is found for small g and u (in fact, a quite small value of g0 is actually required for perturbation theory to w...

work page
[4]

Gaussian tricritical ﬁxed point

4 ·0. 22 ≃ 0. 06. In this case, it is considerably smaller than the actual error. Since the three-loop order cannot account for the discrepancy in the values of g, we could infer that most of the error is not perturbative. That is, the problem should lie in 26 the formulation of the exact RG employed in Ref. 29, speciﬁcally, in th e truncation made. The n...

work page
[5]

has calculated the 3-loop integrals of ( λφ 4)3 theory with dimensional regularization, allowing for diﬀerent masses in the propagators. We could employ the preceding results, but it is useful to present what probably is the simplest cutoﬀ calcula tion, in position space, taking advantage of the simple form of the propagator in position sp ace (as does Ra...

work page
[6]

Integrals for Z We still need some further integrals for the ﬁeld renormalization fac tor Z. Since the integrals for the calculation of Z in the quartic theory are ﬁnite and are given by Kudlis and 36 Pikelner [32], we focus on the tenth Feynman graph integral, which is t he only remaining one, for the sextic theory. It must have two (amputated) exter nal...

work page
[7]

Itzykson and J.-B

C. Itzykson and J.-B. Zuber, Quantum Field Theory , McGraw-Hill, New York (1980)

work page 1980
[8]

Parisi, Statistical Field Theory, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, (1988)

G. Parisi, Statistical Field Theory, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, (1988)

work page 1988
[9]

Zinn-Justin, Quantum Field Theory and Critical Phenomena , 4th edition, Clarendon, Ox- ford (2002)

J. Zinn-Justin, Quantum Field Theory and Critical Phenomena , 4th edition, Clarendon, Ox- ford (2002)

work page 2002
[10]

Cao and S.S

T.-Y. Cao and S.S. Schweber, Synthese 97, 33–108 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01255832

work page doi:10.1007/bf01255832 1993
[11]

Weinberg, The Quantum Theory of Fields, vol

S. Weinberg, The Quantum Theory of Fields, vol. I , Cambridge Univ. Press, New York (1995). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139644167

work page doi:10.1017/cbo9781139644167 1995
[12]

Burgess, Introduction to Eﬀective Field Theory , Cambridge University Press (2021)

C.P. Burgess, Introduction to Eﬀective Field Theory , Cambridge University Press (2021). https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139048040

work page doi:10.1017/9781139048040 2021
[13]

More on equations of motion for interacting massless fields of all spins in (3+1)-dimensions

K.G. Wilson and J. Kogut, Phys. Rept. 12C, 75 (1974). http s://doi.org/10.1016/0370- 1573(74)90023-4

work page doi:10.1016/0370- 1974
[14]

Landau and E.M

L.D. Landau and E.M. Lifshitz, Statistical Physics, Part 1 , 3rd ed.; Pergamon Press: Oxford, UK (1980)

work page 1980
[15]

Migdal, Sov

A.A. Migdal, Sov. Phys. JETP 32, 552–560 (1971). https:/ /jetp.ras.ru/cgi- bin/dn/e 032 03 0552.pdf

work page 1971
[16]

Riedel and F.J

E.K. Riedel and F.J. Wegner. Phys. Rev. Lett. 29, 349–35 2 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.29.349

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.29.349 1972
[17]

Stephen and J.L

M.J. Stephen and J.L. McCauley. Physics Letters A 44, 89 –90 (1973)

work page 1973
[18]

F. J. Wegner and E. K. Riedel, Phys. Rev. B7, 248–256 (197 3). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.7.248

work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.7.248
[19]

Riedel and F.J

E.K. Riedel and F.J. Wegner. Phys. Rev. B9, 294–315 (197 4). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.9.294

work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.9.294
[20]

Stephen, E

M.J. Stephen, E. Abrahams and J.P. Straley, Phys. Rev. B 12, 256 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.12.256

work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.12.256 1975
[21]

Pfeuty, G

P. Pfeuty, G. Toulouse, Introduction to the renormalization group and critical phen omena, John Wiley & Sons, London (1977)

work page 1977
[22]

Arag˜ ao de Carvalho, Nuclear Physics B119, 401–41 2 (1977)

C.A. Arag˜ ao de Carvalho, Nuclear Physics B119, 401–41 2 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(77)90003-7 40

work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(77)90003-7 1977
[23]

Gorodetski and V.M

E.E. Gorodetski and V.M. Zaprudski, Sov. Phys. JETP 45, 1209 (1977). https://www.jetp.ras.ru/cgi-bin/dn/e 045 06 1209.pdf

work page 1977
[24]

Sokolov, Sov

A.I. Sokolov, Sov. Phys. JETP 50, 802 (1979). http://je tp.ras.ru/cgi- bin/dn/e 050 04 0802.pdf

work page 1979
[25]

Lawrie and S

I.D. Lawrie and S. Sarbach, Theory of Tricritical Points , in Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena, vol 9, ed C Domb and J L Lebowitz, New York: Academic Press (19 84)

work page
[26]

Ginzburg and A.A

V.L. Ginzburg and A.A. Sobyanin, Sov. Phys. Usp. 31, 289 (1988). https://iopscience.iop.org/0038-5670/31/4/R01

work page 1988
[27]

Texier and G

J.S. Hager, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 35, 2703–2711 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1088/0305- 4470/35/12/301

work page doi:10.1088/0305- 2002
[28]

Ben Al ` ı Zinati, A

R. Ben Al ` ı Zinati, A. Codello and O. Zanusso, J. High Ene rg. Phys. 2021, 60 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP08(2021)060

work page doi:10.1007/jhep08(2021)060 2021
[29]

Adzhemyan, M.V

L.Ts. Adzhemyan, M.V. Kompaniets, and A.V. Trenogin, Six-loop renormalization group anal- ysis of the φ 4 + φ 6 model, https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.21515

work page arXiv
[30]

McKeon and G

D.G.C. McKeon and G. Tsoupros, Phys. Rev. D46, 1794 (199 2). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.46.1794 Erratum: Phys. Rev. D49, 3065 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1103/Ph ysRevD.49.3065

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.46.1794 1994
[31]

Huish and D.J

G.J. Huish and D.J. Toms, Phys. Rev. D49, 6767 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.49.6767

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.49.6767 1994
[32]

Huish, Phys

G.J. Huish, Phys. Rev. D51, 938 (1995). https://doi.or g/10.1103/PhysRevD.51.938

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.51.938 1995
[33]

Shrock, Phys

R. Shrock, Phys. Rev. D 107, 096009 (2023). https://doi .org/10.1103/PhysRevD.107.096009

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.107.096009 2023
[34]

(2015) Hamiltonian formalism and path entropy maximization.J

N.V. Kharuk, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 58, 395401 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1088/1751- 8121/ae0798

work page doi:10.1088/1751- 2025
[35]

Gaite, Nucl

J. Gaite, Nucl. Phys. B 1019, 117109 (2025). https://do i.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2025.117109

work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2025.117109 2025
[36]

Baker, B.G

G.A. Baker, B.G. Nickel, M.S. Green, and D.I. Meiron, Ph ys. Rev. Lett. 36 (1976) 1351. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.36.1351 G.A. Baker, B.G. Nickel, and D.I. Meiron, Phys. Rev. B 17 (197 8) 1365. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.17.1365

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.36.1351 1976
[37]

Rajantie, Nucl

A.K. Rajantie, Nucl. Phys. B 480 (1996) 729. https://do i.org/10.1016/S0550-3213(96)00474-9

work page doi:10.1016/s0550-3213(96)00474-9 1996
[38]

Kudlis and A

A. Kudlis and A. Pikelner, Nuclear Physics B 985 (2022) 1 15990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2022.115990 41

work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2022.115990 2022
[39]

Sokolov, V.A

A.I. Sokolov, V.A. Ul’kov and E.V. Orlov, Journal of Phy sical Studies 1, 362–365 (1997). https://physics.lnu.edu.ua/jps/1997/3/pdf/362 365.pdf

work page 1997
[40]

Guida, J

R. Guida, J. Zinn-Justin, Nucl. Phys. B 489 [FS], 626–65 2 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0550-3213(96)00704-3

work page doi:10.1016/s0550-3213(96)00704-3 1997
[41]

Sberveglieri and G

G. Sberveglieri and G. Spada, J. High Energ. Phys. 2024, 73 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP05%282024%29073

work page doi:10.1007/jhep05 2024
[42]

Le Guillou and J

J.C. Le Guillou and J. Zinn Justin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 39 (1 977) 95. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.39.95

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.39.95
[43]

Nickel, D.I

B.G. Nickel, D.I. Meiron, and G.B. Baker, Univ. of Guelp h Report, 1977

work page 1977
[44]

Padilla and R.G.C

A. Padilla and R.G.C. Smith, Phys. Rev. D110, 025010 (20 24). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.110.025010

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.025010
[45]

Guckenheimer and P

J. Guckenheimer and P. Holmes, Nonlinear Oscillations, Dynamical Systems, and Bifurcati ons of Vector Fields. Applied Mathematical Sciences, 42. Springer-Verlag, New Y ork (1983)

work page 1983
[46]

Perko, Diﬀerential Equations and Dynamical Systems, Third Edition

L. Perko, Diﬀerential Equations and Dynamical Systems, Third Edition. Texts in Applied Mathematics, 7. Springer-Verlag, New York (2001)

work page 2001
[47]

Wallace and R.K.P

D.J. Wallace and R.K.P. Zia, Annals of Physics 92, 142–1 63 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(75)90267-5

work page doi:10.1016/0003-4916(75)90267-5 1975
[48]

Zamolodchikov, JETP Lett

A.B. Zamolodchikov, JETP Lett. 43, 730 (1986). http:// jetpletters.ru/ps/1413/article 21504.pdf

work page 1986
[49]

Jack and H

I. Jack and H. Osborn, Nucl. Phys. B 343, 647 (1990)

work page 1990
[50]

Gaite and D

J. Gaite and D. O’Connor, Phys. Rev. D54, 5163–5173 (199 6). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.54.5163

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.54.5163
[51]

Gaite, Phys

J. Gaite, Phys. Rev. D62, 125023 (2000). https://doi.o rg/10.1103/PhysRevD.62.125023

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.62.125023 2000
[52]

Apenko, Physica A 391, 62–77 (2012)

S.M. Apenko, Physica A 391, 62–77 (2012). http://dx.do i.org/10.1016/j.physa.2011.08.014

work page doi:10.1016/j.physa.2011.08.014 2012
[53]

& Sena, C

G. Shore, The c and a-Theorems and the Local Renormalisation Group. SpringerBriefs in Physics, Springer (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978- 3-319-54000-9

work page doi:10.1007/978- 2017
[54]

Morozov and A

A. Morozov and A. Niemi, Nucl. Phys. B666, 336 (2003)

work page 2003
[55]

Gukov, Nuclear Physics B 919, 583–638 (2017)

S. Gukov, Nuclear Physics B 919, 583–638 (2017)

work page 2017
[56]

Andronov, E.A

A.A. Andronov, E.A. Leontovich, I.I. Gordon and A.G. Ma ier, Qualitative Theory of Second- Order Dynamical Systems. John Wiley and Sons, New York (1973)

work page 1973
[57]

Dumortier, J

F. Dumortier, J. Llibre, J.C. Art´ es, Qualitative Theory of Planar Diﬀerential Systems. Uni- versitext, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (2006). 42

work page 2006
[58]

Sokolov, A

A.I. Sokolov, A. Kudlis and M.A. Nikitina, Nucl. Phys. B 921, 225–235 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2017.05.019

work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2017.05.019 2017
[59]

Mangano, M

E. Gardi, M. Karliner and G. Grunberg, JHEP07, 007 (1998 ). https://doi.org/10.1088/1126- 6708/1998/07/007

work page doi:10.1088/1126- 1998
[60]

Wolf, Experimental Studies of Magnetic Tricritic al Points: Problems and Progress

W.P. Wolf, Experimental Studies of Magnetic Tricritic al Points: Problems and Progress. In: Pynn, R., Skjeltorp, A. (eds) Multicritical Phenomena . NATO ASI Series, vol 106. Springer, Boston, MA (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613- 2741-7 3

work page doi:10.1007/978-1-4613- 1984
[61]

Wegner and A

F.J. Wegner and A. Houghton, Phys. Rev. A 8, 401 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.8.401

work page doi:10.1103/physreva.8.401 1973
[62]

Gradshteyn and I.M

I.S. Gradshteyn and I.M. Ryzhik, Table of Integrals, Series, and Products , 7th Edition, Aca- demic Press (2007). 43

work page 2007