pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.11078 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-11 · ✦ hep-ph · astro-ph.CO· hep-ex

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

An ultra-broadband axion dark matter experiment

Angelo Esposito , Kin Chung Fong , Lam Hui
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 03:04 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph astro-ph.COhep-ex
keywords axion dark matterbroadband searchSQUID detectoraxion-photon couplingflux sweet spotlock-in detectionnulling techniquedark matter experiment
0
0 comments X

The pith

A dc SQUID at its flux sweet spot senses axion dark matter quadratically across more than 15 orders of magnitude in mass.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes detecting axions through observables that depend on the square of the axion field rather than its linear value. It implements this by running a dc SQUID at the point where its output voltage responds quadratically to magnetic flux and applying lock-in modulation to bypass low-frequency noise. The resulting setup covers axion masses over a span of 15 orders of magnitude with a projected reach to couplings as weak as 10^{-16} GeV^{-1}, independent of mass and well below existing limits. A nulling method is outlined to control systematic backgrounds. The approach could extend to other axion couplings and dark-matter candidates.

Core claim

The central claim is that operating a dc SQUID at the flux sweet spot produces a voltage response quadratic in the applied flux; when combined with lock-in detection this converts the axion-induced magnetic-field oscillations into a measurable signal that remains sensitive across more than fifteen decades in axion mass, reaching |g_aγγ| ≳ 10^{-16} GeV^{-1} largely independent of mass while a nulling technique suppresses backgrounds.

What carries the argument

dc SQUID biased at the flux sweet spot, where voltage is quadratic in magnetic flux, together with lock-in modulation to reject low-frequency noise.

If this is right

  • The experiment can scan axion masses from roughly 10^{-22} eV to 10^{-6} eV in a single apparatus without retuning.
  • Projected sensitivity stays roughly constant across that range rather than degrading at the edges.
  • The quadratic-response principle can be adapted to search for axion-fermion couplings.
  • The same architecture can target other light dark-matter candidates such as dark photons.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Broadband operation could replace many narrowband cavity experiments and reduce the total number of distinct detectors needed.
  • Mass-independent sensitivity would allow a single data set to constrain both very light and heavier axions simultaneously.
  • If the nulling technique works, similar quadratic-response sensors might be applied to other oscillating dark-matter fields.

Load-bearing premise

Systematic backgrounds and low-frequency noise can be reduced to acceptable levels by the proposed nulling technique without destabilizing SQUID operation at the flux sweet spot over the full frequency range.

What would settle it

A bench test in which residual backgrounds after nulling remain above the level needed to reach |g_aγγ| = 10^{-16} GeV^{-1} or in which stable SQUID operation cannot be maintained while sweeping across 15 orders of frequency.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.11078 by Angelo Esposito, Kin Chung Fong, Lam Hui.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Projected sensitivity. Red regions are excluded by [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We propose a novel broadband strategy to search for axions by leveraging observables controlled by the axion field squared. We present a practical implementation of this concept for probing the axion--photon coupling. This is done by operating a dc SQUID at the flux sweet spot, where the voltage depends quadratically on the magnetic flux, and using lock-in modulation to evade low-frequency noise. The proposed setup is ultra-broadband, spanning over 15 orders of magnitude in axion mass, with further expansion of the mass range possible. The projected sensitivity is $|g_{a\gamma\gamma}| \gtrsim 10^{-16} \text{ GeV}^{-1}$, orders of magnitude better than current bounds, and largely independent of axion mass. We discuss the sources of systematic background and a nulling technique to reduce them to an acceptable level. We also discuss how our strategy could be adapted to probe the axion-fermion coupling, as well as to detect other dark matter candidates such as dark photons.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a novel ultra-broadband strategy for axion dark matter searches that exploits observables quadratic in the axion field. The practical implementation operates a dc SQUID at the flux sweet spot (quadratic voltage-flux response) with lock-in modulation to evade low-frequency noise. It claims sensitivity |g_aγγ| ≳ 10^{-16} GeV^{-1} spanning more than 15 orders of magnitude in axion mass, largely mass-independent, while discussing systematic backgrounds and a nulling technique to suppress them. Adaptations to axion-fermion coupling and other dark matter candidates are also outlined.

Significance. If the central assumptions hold, the proposal would enable searches over an unprecedented mass range with sensitivity far exceeding current bounds, using only established superconducting device physics without free parameters or ad-hoc inventions. This could open new parameter space for axion dark matter and provide a template adaptable to other couplings, with the mass-independent projection being a particularly attractive feature if quantitatively validated.

major comments (1)
  1. [Discussion of systematic backgrounds and nulling technique] The ultra-broadband and mass-independent sensitivity claims rest on the nulling technique successfully reducing all systematic backgrounds (residual linear flux terms, temperature drifts, external magnetic noise) below the projected signal while the SQUID remains stably locked at the flux sweet spot across ~10^{-7} Hz to ~10^8 Hz. The manuscript discusses the technique and backgrounds but supplies no quantitative noise budget, frequency-dependent transfer function, stability analysis, or simulations demonstrating that the quadratic response dominates and the effective noise floor stays flat. This is load-bearing for the central projection.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract would be clearer if it stated the explicit mass or frequency range corresponding to the 'over 15 orders of magnitude' claim rather than leaving it implicit.
  2. [Throughout] Ensure consistent notation for the axion-photon coupling (e.g., g_aγγ vs. g_{aγγ}) and provide a brief comparison table of the projected sensitivity against existing limits for context.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive evaluation of our proposal's significance and for the constructive major comment. We address it point by point below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate the requested quantitative elements.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The ultra-broadband and mass-independent sensitivity claims rest on the nulling technique successfully reducing all systematic backgrounds (residual linear flux terms, temperature drifts, external magnetic noise) below the projected signal while the SQUID remains stably locked at the flux sweet spot across ~10^{-7} Hz to ~10^8 Hz. The manuscript discusses the technique and backgrounds but supplies no quantitative noise budget, frequency-dependent transfer function, stability analysis, or simulations demonstrating that the quadratic response dominates and the effective noise floor stays flat. This is load-bearing for the central projection.

    Authors: We agree that the central sensitivity projection requires quantitative support for the nulling technique's ability to keep systematics below the signal level across the stated frequency range. The manuscript currently offers a qualitative outline of backgrounds and the nulling approach. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated subsection containing order-of-magnitude noise-budget calculations based on standard dc-SQUID parameters from the literature (flux noise, modulation depth, thermal stability). These estimates will show the residual linear flux term after nulling, the temperature-drift contribution under quadratic operation, and the external-field rejection via lock-in and shielding. We will also sketch the frequency-dependent transfer function of the modulated sweet-spot readout and argue that the effective noise floor remains flat over 10^{-7} Hz to 10^8 Hz, consistent with known SQUID bandwidths. While end-to-end numerical simulations lie outside the scope of this conceptual proposal, the analytical estimates and literature references will demonstrate that the quadratic response can dominate. The revisions will strengthen the manuscript without altering its core claims or requiring new experimental data. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; proposal uses standard SQUID physics

full rationale

The manuscript is an experimental proposal whose sensitivity projection follows directly from the established quadratic voltage-flux characteristic of a dc SQUID at the flux sweet spot together with conventional lock-in demodulation. These relations are taken from textbook superconducting electronics and are independent of the axion field; the projected |g_aγγ| bound is obtained by inserting the axion-induced flux into the known transfer function rather than by fitting or redefining any quantity in terms of the target signal. No load-bearing self-citation, uniqueness theorem, or ansatz is invoked to close the argument. The nulling procedure is presented as an engineering assumption whose performance must be verified, not as a derived result that reduces to the input by construction. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained and non-circular.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The proposal rests on standard axion electrodynamics and known SQUID device physics; no new particles, forces, or fitted constants are introduced beyond the conventional axion-photon coupling whose value is the target of the search.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Axions couple to photons through the standard dimension-5 operator with coupling g_aγγ
    Standard model extension used throughout the abstract.
  • standard math dc SQUID voltage response is quadratic in flux at the sweet spot
    Well-established property of SQUID devices invoked for the detection principle.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5475 in / 1470 out tokens · 93007 ms · 2026-05-13T03:04:08.421064+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 60 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    nulling flux

    Each curve stops at a maximum axion mass given by 1/ℓ = G−1/3, as discussed in the text. The dashed lines are qualitative representations of the m2 a scaling suppressing the corrections to the magneto-quasistatic limit (Appendix A). For ways to probe higher masses, see Section IV. The comparison between the current state-of-the-art and our expected sensit...

    work page

  2. [2]

    CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons,

    R. D. Peccei and Helen R. Quinn, “CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons,” Phys. Rev. Lett.38, 1440–1443 (1977)

    work page 1977

  3. [3]

    A New Light Boson?

    Steven Weinberg, “A New Light Boson?” Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 223–226 (1978)

    work page 1978

  4. [4]

    Problem of Strong P and T Invariance in the Presence of Instantons,

    Frank Wilczek, “Problem of Strong P and T Invariance in the Presence of Instantons,” Phys. Rev. Lett.40, 279–282 (1978)

    work page 1978

  5. [5]

    Weak Interaction Singlet and Strong CP Invariance,

    Jihn E. Kim, “Weak Interaction Singlet and Strong CP Invariance,” Phys. Rev. Lett.43, 103 (1979)

    work page 1979

  6. [6]

    Can Confinement Ensure Natural CP Invari- ance of Strong Interactions?

    Mikhail A. Shifman, A. I. Vainshtein, and Valentin I. Zakharov, “Can Confinement Ensure Natural CP Invari- ance of Strong Interactions?” Nucl. Phys. B166, 493–506 (1980)

    work page 1980

  7. [7]

    On Possible Suppression of the Axion Hadron Interactions. (In Russian),

    A. R. Zhitnitsky, “On Possible Suppression of the Axion Hadron Interactions. (In Russian),” Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 31, 260 (1980)

    work page 1980

  8. [8]

    A Simple Solution to the Strong CP Problem with a Harm- less Axion,

    Michael Dine, Willy Fischler, and Mark Srednicki, “A Simple Solution to the Strong CP Problem with a Harm- less Axion,” Phys. Lett. B104, 199–202 (1981)

    work page 1981

  9. [9]

    Axions and the Strong CP Problem,

    Jihn E. Kim and Gianpaolo Carosi, “Axions and the Strong CP Problem,” Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 557–602 (2010), [Erratum: Rev.Mod.Phys. 91, 049902 (2019)], arXiv:0807.3125 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2010

  10. [10]

    Di Luzio, M

    Luca Di Luzio, Maurizio Giannotti, Enrico Nardi, and Luca Visinelli, “The landscape of QCD axion models,” Phys. Rept.870, 1–117 (2020), arXiv:2003.01100 [hep- ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  11. [11]

    Cos- mology of the Invisible Axion,

    John Preskill, Mark B. Wise, and Frank Wilczek, “Cos- mology of the Invisible Axion,” Phys. Lett. B120, 127– 132 (1983)

    work page 1983

  12. [12]

    A Cosmological Bound on the Invisible Axion,

    L. F. Abbott and P. Sikivie, “A Cosmological Bound on the Invisible Axion,” Phys. Lett. B120, 133–136 (1983)

    work page 1983

  13. [13]

    The Not So Harmless Axion,

    Michael Dine and Willy Fischler, “The Not So Harmless Axion,” Phys. Lett. B120, 137–141 (1983)

    work page 1983

  14. [14]

    Axion Cosmology

    David J. E. Marsh, “Axion Cosmology,” Phys. Rept.643, 1–79 (2016), arXiv:1510.07633 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2016

  15. [15]

    Re- cent Progress in the Physics of Axions and Axion-Like Particles,

    Kiwoon Choi, Sang Hui Im, and Chang Sub Shin, “Re- cent Progress in the Physics of Axions and Axion-Like Particles,” Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.71, 225–252 (2021), arXiv:2012.05029 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  16. [16]

    Hui,Wave Dark Matter,Ann

    Lam Hui, “Wave Dark Matter,” Ann. Rev. Astron. As- 8 trophys.59, 247–289 (2021), arXiv:2101.11735 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2021

  17. [17]

    New experimental approaches in the search for axion-like particles

    Igor G. Irastorza and Javier Redondo, “New experimental approaches in the search for axion-like particles,” Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.102, 89–159 (2018), arXiv:1801.08127 [hep-ph]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2018

  18. [18]

    Cosmology of axion dark matter,

    Ciaran A. J. O’Hare, “Cosmology of axion dark matter,” PoSCOSMICWISPers, 040 (2024), arXiv:2403.17697 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  19. [19]

    Caputo and G

    Andrea Caputo and Georg Raffelt, “Astrophysical Axion Bounds: The 2024 Edition,” PoSCOSMICWISPers, 041 (2024), arXiv:2401.13728 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  20. [20]

    Bose-Einstein Condensation of Dark Matter Axions,

    P. Sikivie and Q. Yang, “Bose-Einstein Condensation of Dark Matter Axions,” Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 111301 (2009), arXiv:0901.1106 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2009

  21. [21]

    Do Dark Matter Axions Form a Condensate with Long-Range Correlation?,

    Alan H. Guth, Mark P. Hertzberg, and C. Prescod- Weinstein, “Do Dark Matter Axions Form a Condensate with Long-Range Correlation?” Phys. Rev. D92, 103513 (2015), arXiv:1412.5930 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2015

  22. [22]

    Intrinsically Quantum Effects of Axion Dark Matter are Undetectable,

    Yunjia Bao, Dhong Yeon Cheong, Nicholas L. Rodd, Joey Takach, Lian-Tao Wang, and Kevin Zhou, “Intrinsically Quantum Effects of Axion Dark Matter are Undetectable,” (2025), arXiv:2510.05198 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  23. [23]

    Search for axion-like dark matter with ferromagnets,

    Alexander V. Gramolin, Deniz Aybas, Dorian Johnson, Janos Adam, and Alexander O. Sushkov, “Search for axion-like dark matter with ferromagnets,” Nature Phys. 17, 79–84 (2021), arXiv:2003.03348 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2021

  24. [24]

    Search for Low-Mass Axion Dark Matter with ABRACADABRA-10 cm,

    Chiara P. Salemiet al., “Search for Low-Mass Axion Dark Matter with ABRACADABRA-10 cm,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 081801 (2021), arXiv:2102.06722 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2021

  25. [25]

    Search for Dark Matter Axions with CAST-CAPP,

    C. M. Adairet al., “Search for Dark Matter Axions with CAST-CAPP,” Nature Commun.13, 6180 (2022), arXiv:2211.02902 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2022

  26. [26]

    Search for axion dark matter with the QUAX–LNF tunable haloscope,

    A. Rettaroliet al.(QUAX), “Search for axion dark matter with the QUAX–LNF tunable haloscope,” Phys. Rev. D 110, 022008 (2024), arXiv:2402.19063 [physics.ins-det]

    work page arXiv 2024

  27. [27]

    Search for Axion Dark Matter from 1.1 to 1.3 GHz with ADMX,

    G. Carosiet al.(ADMX), “Search for Axion Dark Matter from 1.1 to 1.3 GHz with ADMX,” Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 191001 (2025), arXiv:2504.07279 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2025

  28. [28]

    Short-range spin-dependent interactions of elec- trons: a probe for exotic pseudo-Goldstone bosons,

    W. A. Terrano, E. G. Adelberger, J. G. Lee, and B. R. Heckel, “Short-range spin-dependent interactions of elec- trons: a probe for exotic pseudo-Goldstone bosons,” Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 201801 (2015), arXiv:1508.02463 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2015

  29. [29]

    Search for Axionlike Dark Matter with a Liquid-State Nuclear Spin Comagnetometer,

    Teng Wuet al., “Search for Axionlike Dark Matter with a Liquid-State Nuclear Spin Comagnetometer,” Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 191302 (2019), arXiv:1901.10843 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2019

  30. [30]

    Earth as a trans- ducer for axion dark-matter detection,

    Ariel Arza, Michael A. Fedderke, Peter W. Graham, Derek F. Jackson Kimball, and Saarik Kalia, “Earth as a trans- ducer for axion dark-matter detection,” Phys. Rev. D 105, 095007 (2022), arXiv:2112.09620 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  31. [31]

    Laboratory Constraints on the Neutron-Spin Coupling of feV-Scale Axions,

    Junyi Lee, Mariangela Lisanti, William A. Terrano, and Michael Romalis, “Laboratory Constraints on the Neutron-Spin Coupling of feV-Scale Axions,” Phys. Rev. X13, 011050 (2023), arXiv:2209.03289 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  32. [32]

    Axion dark matter search from terrestrial mag- netic fields at extremely low frequencies,

    Atsushi Nishizawa, Atsushi Taruya, and Yoshiaki Himem- oto, “Axion dark matter search from terrestrial mag- netic fields at extremely low frequencies,” (2025), arXiv:2504.07559 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  33. [33]

    Progress on the ARI- ADNE axion experiment,

    A. A. Geraciet al.(ARIADNE), “Progress on the ARI- ADNE axion experiment,” Springer Proc. Phys.211, 151– 161 (2018), arXiv:1710.05413 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page arXiv 2018

  34. [34]

    First Results from ABRACADABRA-10 cm: A Search for Sub- µeV Ax- ion Dark Matter,

    Jonathan L. Ouelletet al., “First Results from ABRACADABRA-10 cm: A Search for Sub- µeV Ax- ion Dark Matter,” Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 121802 (2019), arXiv:1810.12257 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2019

  35. [35]

    ADMX SLIC: Results from a Superconducting LC Circuit Investigating Cold Axions,

    N. Crisosto, P. Sikivie, N. S. Sullivan, D. B. Tanner, J. Yang, and G. Rybka, “ADMX SLIC: Results from a Superconducting LC Circuit Investigating Cold Axions,” Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 241101 (2020), arXiv:1911.05772 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2020

  36. [36]

    Design and implementation of the ABRACADABRA-10 cm axion dark matter search,

    Jonathan L. Ouelletet al., “Design and implementation of the ABRACADABRA-10 cm axion dark matter search,” Phys. Rev. D99, 052012 (2019), arXiv:1901.10652 [physics.ins-det]

    work page arXiv 2019

  37. [37]

    Constraints on the Coupling be- tween Axionlike Dark Matter and Photons Using an An- tiproton Superconducting Tuned Detection Circuit in a Cryogenic Penning Trap,

    Jack A. Devlinet al., “Constraints on the Coupling be- tween Axionlike Dark Matter and Photons Using an An- tiproton Superconducting Tuned Detection Circuit in a Cryogenic Penning Trap,” Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 041301 (2021), arXiv:2101.11290 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2021

  38. [38]

    Constraints on axion- like dark matter from a SERF comagnetometer,

    Itay M. Bloch, Roy Shaham, Yonit Hochberg, Eric Kuflik, Tomer Volansky, and Or Katz, “Constraints on axion- like dark matter from a SERF comagnetometer,” Nature Commun.14, 5784 (2023), arXiv:2209.13588 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  39. [39]

    Projected sensitivity of DMRadio-m3: A search for the QCD axion below 1 µeV,

    L. Brouweret al.(DMRadio), “Projected sensitivity of DMRadio-m3: A search for the QCD axion below 1 µeV,” Phys. Rev. D106, 103008 (2022), arXiv:2204.13781 [hep- ex]

    work page arXiv 2022

  40. [40]

    Dc squid: Noise and optimization,

    Claudia D. Tesche and John Clarke, “Dc squid: Noise and optimization,” Journal of Low Temperature Physics 29, 301–331 (1977)

    work page 1977

  41. [41]

    Low-frequency fluctuations in solids: 1f noise,

    P. Dutta and P. M. Horn, “Low-frequency fluctuations in solids: 1f noise,” Rev. Mod. Phys.53, 497–516 (1981)

    work page 1981

  42. [42]

    1f noise and other slow, nonexponential kinetics in condensed matter,

    M. B. Weissman, “1f noise and other slow, nonexponential kinetics in condensed matter,” Rev. Mod. Phys.60, 537– 571 (1988)

    work page 1988

  43. [43]

    Superconducting quantum interference device instruments and applications,

    Robert L. Fagaly, “Superconducting quantum interference device instruments and applications,” Review of scientific instruments77(2006), 10.1063/1.2354545

    work page doi:10.1063/1.2354545 2006

  44. [44]

    Kogan,Electronic noise and fluctuations in solids (Cambridge University Press, 2008)

    Sh. Kogan,Electronic noise and fluctuations in solids (Cambridge University Press, 2008)

    work page 2008

  45. [45]

    1/f noise: Implications for solid-state quantum information,

    E. Paladino, Y. M. Galperin, G. Falci, and B. L. Alt- shuler, “1/f noise: Implications for solid-state quantum information,” Reviews of Modern Physics86, 361–418 (2014)

    work page 2014

  46. [46]

    Phase sensitive de- tection as a means to recover signals buried in noise,

    D. P. Blair and P. H. Sydenham, “Phase sensitive de- tection as a means to recover signals buried in noise,” Journal of Physics E: Scientific Instruments8, 621 (1975)

    work page 1975

  47. [47]

    Paul Horowitz, Winfield Hill, and Virgil Elings,The art of electronics(American Institute of Physics, 1981)

    work page 1981

  48. [48]

    Lock-in amplifiers: principles and ap- plications,

    Mike L. Meade, “Lock-in amplifiers: principles and ap- plications,” IEE Electrical Measurement Series (1983), 10.1049/ip-g-1.1984.0025

    work page doi:10.1049/ip-g-1.1984.0025 1983

  49. [49]

    Lock-in amplifiers as a platform for weak signal measure- ments: Development and applications,

    Qianwen Zhang, Wonje Jeong, and Dae Joon Kang, “Lock-in amplifiers as a platform for weak signal measure- ments: Development and applications,” Current Applied Physics66, 95–109 (2024)

    work page 2024

  50. [50]

    Broadband and Resonant Approaches to Axion Dark Matter Detection,

    Yonatan Kahn, Benjamin R. Safdi, and Jesse Thaler, “Broadband and Resonant Approaches to Axion Dark Matter Detection,” Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 141801 (2016), arXiv:1602.01086 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2016

  51. [51]

    Calculated signal-to-noise ratio of mri detected with squids and faraday detectors in fields from 10 µt to 1.5 t,

    Whittier Myers, Daniel Slichter, Michael Hatridge, Sarah Busch, Michael M¨ oßle, Robert McDermott, Andreas Trabesinger, and John Clarke, “Calculated signal-to-noise ratio of mri detected with squids and faraday detectors in fields from 10 µt to 1.5 t,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance 186, 182–192 (2007)

    work page 2007

  52. [52]

    Opti- mization of dc squid voltmeter and magnetometer circuits,

    John Clarke, Claudia D. Tesche, and R. P. Giffard, “Opti- mization of dc squid voltmeter and magnetometer circuits,” 9 Journal of Low Temperature Physics37, 405–420 (1979)

    work page 1979

  53. [53]

    Vortices and waves in light dark matter,

    Lam Hui, Austin Joyce, Michael J. Landry, and Xinyu Li, “Vortices and waves in light dark matter,” JCAP01, 011 (2021), arXiv:2004.01188 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2021

  54. [54]

    The RAVE survey: the Galactic escape speed and the mass of the Milky Way,

    Til Pifflet al., “The RAVE survey: the Galactic escape speed and the mass of the Milky Way,” Astron. Astrophys. 562, A91 (2014), arXiv:1309.4293 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2014

  55. [55]

    The dark matter profile of the milky way inferred from its circular velocity curve,

    Xiaowei Ou, Anna-Christina Eilers, Lina Necib, and Anna Frebel, “The dark matter profile of the milky way inferred from its circular velocity curve,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society528, 693–710 (2024)

    work page 2024

  56. [56]

    The escape speed curve of the galaxy obtained from gaia dr2 implies a heavy milky way,

    Giacomo Monari, Benoit Famaey, Ismael Carrillo, Tilmann Piffl, Matthias Steinmetz, Rosemary FG Wyse, Friedrich Anders, Cristina Chiappini, and Katja Janssen, “The escape speed curve of the galaxy obtained from gaia dr2 implies a heavy milky way,” Astronomy & Astro- physics616, L9 (2018)

    work page 2018

  57. [57]

    cajohare/axionlimits: Axionlimits,

    Ciaran O’Hare, “cajohare/axionlimits: Axionlimits,” https://cajohare.github.io/AxionLimits/(2020)

    work page 2020

  58. [58]

    Lumped- element axion dark matter detection beyond the magne- toquasistatic limit,

    Joshua N. Benabou, Joshua W. Foster, Yonatan Kahn, Benjamin R. Safdi, and Chiara P. Salemi, “Lumped- element axion dark matter detection beyond the magne- toquasistatic limit,” Phys. Rev. D108, 035009 (2023), arXiv:2211.00008 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  59. [59]

    John David Jackson,Classical Electrodynamics(Wiley, 1998)

    work page 1998

  60. [60]

    Relativistic Corrections to Nonrelativistic Effec- tive Field Theories,

    Mohammad Hossein Namjoo, Alan H. Guth, and David I. Kaiser, “Relativistic Corrections to Nonrelativistic Effec- tive Field Theories,” Phys. Rev. D98, 016011 (2018), arXiv:1712.00445 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2018