pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.11314 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-11 · 💻 cs.CV · cs.AI

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Quantifying Rodda and Graham Gait Classification from 3D Makerless Kinematics derived from a Single-view Video in a Heterogeneous Pediatric Clinical Cohort

Anita Bagley, Hyeokhyen Kwon, Jeremy Bauer, Joseph Krzak, Karen Kruger, Lauhitya Reddy, Maura Eveld, Ross Chafetz, Seth Donahue, Susan Sienko, Vedant Kulkarni

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 05:48 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CV cs.AI
keywords markerless gait analysissingle-view videoRodda and Graham classificationz-scorespediatric gaitcerebral palsy3D kinematicsclinical screening
0
0 comments X

The pith

A markerless pipeline from single-view video quantifies Rodda and Graham knee and ankle z-scores with R² of 0.80 for knees against 3D gait analysis in 152 children.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper builds a system that turns ordinary clinical videos of children walking into numerical z-scores for knee and ankle alignment using the Rodda and Graham classification. It tests this on over a thousand limb samples from 152 kids with sixty different diagnoses and finds solid agreement for knee measures and usable but weaker agreement for ankle measures when compared to expensive 3D motion-capture labs. The approach also supports binary screening for excess knee flexion and full seven-class gait typing while producing continuous scores that can be tracked over repeated visits. This matters because 3D analysis is available only at specialized centers and observational ratings vary between clinicians, so video-derived numbers could bring consistent, low-cost monitoring to more settings. The work positions the method as a practical step toward routine objective gait assessment outside research labs.

Core claim

A markerless gait analysis pipeline quantifies Rodda and Graham knee and ankle z-scores directly from single-view clinical gait videos. Across 1,058 bilateral limb samples from 529 trials of 152 children with 60 distinct primary diagnoses, the sagittal-view model achieved R² = 0.80 ± 0.02 and CCC = 0.89 ± 0.02 for knee z-scores and R² = 0.57 ± 0.02 and CCC = 0.72 ± 0.02 for ankle z-scores against 3D-IGA. Binary screening for excess knee flexion reaches AUROC = 0.88 while full seven-class classification yields 43 ± 1 % accuracy with macro-AUROC = 0.78 ± 0.01, with ankle error remaining the main limit; continuous z-scores further enable longitudinal trajectory tracking.

What carries the argument

The markerless pipeline that converts single-view 2D video kinematics into 3D-derived knee and ankle z-scores for direct use in the Rodda and Graham system.

If this is right

  • Binary screening for excess knee flexion identifies affected children with AUROC 0.88 and 83 % sensitivity.
  • Rule-based assignment to seven gait classes achieves 43 % accuracy and macro-AUROC 0.78.
  • Continuous z-scores allow tracking of gait changes across multiple clinic visits to monitor progression and treatment response.
  • Video-based quantification provides an objective alternative to observational scales in clinics without 3D equipment.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Lower ankle accuracy points to possible gains from adding a second camera angle or targeted model improvements for foot placement.
  • Performance across sixty diagnoses suggests the same pipeline could extend to gait problems in other pediatric neuromuscular conditions.
  • Longitudinal z-score tracking could support earlier detection of walking decline and more frequent adjustment of interventions than yearly lab visits allow.
  • Deployment on consumer smartphones would shift monitoring from occasional clinic trips to regular home-based measurements.

Load-bearing premise

That single-view 2D video kinematics can be mapped reliably to the 3D-IGA z-scores used as ground truth, particularly for ankle measurements where agreement is lower.

What would settle it

An independent test set of 100 children with simultaneous 3D-IGA recordings in which the video-derived knee z-scores produce R² below 0.60 would show the mapping does not hold.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.11314 by Anita Bagley, Hyeokhyen Kwon, Jeremy Bauer, Joseph Krzak, Karen Kruger, Lauhitya Reddy, Maura Eveld, Ross Chafetz, Seth Donahue, Susan Sienko, Vedant Kulkarni.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Rodda and Graham z-score space. The horizontal axis represents the ankle z-score (negative: excess plantarflexion; positive: excess dorsiflexion) and the vertical axis represents the knee z-score (negative: hyperextension; positive: excess flexion). The gray region represents z-scores between −1 and +1, considered within the normal range. Silhouettes depict each gait class. CP using 2D pose data captured f… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (a) The sagittal video stream. (b) The frontal video stream. (c) Experimental setup mockup showing the relative positioning of the multi-view recording array used during trials. (d) Monocular 3D pose estimation results across all eight camera viewpoints for a representative child. kinematic deviation measure rather than a diagnosis-specific label. A gait cycle is the sequence of motions that occurs from th… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Overview of the experimental pipeline. Monocular 3D pose estimation extracts keypoints from clinical gait video, which are cleaned and represented as raw coordinates or derived joint angles. Both representations are windowed and processed by deep learning models (DCL, ST-GCN, AGCN, and AGCN+ViT) under participant-wise 5-fold cross-validation for ankle and knee z-score regression. May 13, 2026 8/29 [PITH_F… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Trial-level z-score prediction on AGCN+ViT. Top row, predicted vs. true z-scores for (a) knee and (b) ankle. The black line is the regression fit and the gray line is the identity. Red dashed lines mark ±1 classification boundaries. Bottom row, Bland-Altman plots for (c) knee (bias = −0.16, LoA = [−4.06, 3.74]) and (d) ankle (bias = 0.23, LoA = [−4.21, 4.67]). Rodda and Graham 7-Class Gait Classification W… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Confusion matrix for Rodda and Graham 7-class classification from predicted z-scores (AGCN). reliably identified classifications. The confusion matrix ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: ROC curve for binary knee flexion classification (AGCN+ViT). AUROC = 0.88. rising in prevalence with age [47]. The clinical decision threshold for this pattern is a single cut-point on the knee z-score (z > 1), making binary detection of z > 1 the most natural first test of whether our continuous z-score predictions can support a clinically useful triage decision. Thresholding predicted knee z-scores at +1… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Per-bin analysis of trial-level AGCN+ViT z-score predictions. The true z-score range is partitioned into contiguous bins of width 0.5, and mean absolute error (MAE) and 3-class accuracy are computed within each bin. (a) Knee per-bin MAE with label-distribution-smoothed inverse sample density overlay (gray). (b) Knee per-bin 3-class accuracy. (c) Ankle per-bin MAE with inverse sample density overlay. (d) An… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Decile-binned calibration plots for knee (left) and ankle (right). The model line (colored) shows mean predicted vs. mean true z-score per decile, where a perfectly calibrated model would follow the identity (dotted). Discussion Direct Biomechanical Calculation From Monocular Video Fails The Rodda and Graham z-score is, by construction, a deterministic function of sagittal-plane joint angles, and we calcul… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Cerebral Palsy (CP) is a neurological disorder of movement and the most common cause of lifelong physical disability in childhood. Approximately 75% of children with CP are ambulatory, and accurate gait assessment is central to preserving walking function, which deteriorates by mid-adulthood in a quarter to half of adults with CP. The Rodda and Graham classification system quantifies sagittal-plane gait deviations using ankle and knee z-scores derived from 3D Instrumented Gait Analysis (3D-IGA), but 3D-IGA is expensive and limited to specialized centers, while observational assessment shows only moderate inter-rater agreement. We developed a markerless gait analysis pipeline that quantifies Rodda and Graham knee and ankle z-scores directly from single-view clinical gait videos. Across 1,058 bilateral limb samples from 529 trials of 152 children (88 male, 63 female; age 12.1 $\pm$ 4.0 years; 60 distinct primary diagnoses, cerebral palsy the most common at $n=54$), the sagittal-view model achieved $R^2 = 0.80 \pm 0.02$ and CCC $= 0.89 \pm 0.02$ for knee z-scores and $R^2 = 0.57 \pm 0.02$ and CCC $= 0.72 \pm 0.02$ for ankle z-scores against 3D-IGA. Binary screening for excess knee flexion achieves AUROC $= 0.88$, correctly identifying 83% of affected children, and applying Rodda and Graham rules yields $43 \pm 1$% 7-class accuracy with macro-AUROC $= 0.78 \pm 0.01$, ankle prediction error remaining the primary bottleneck. Beyond cross-sectional screening, continuous z-scores support longitudinal trajectory tracking across visits, providing a quantitative substrate for monitoring disease progression and treatment response unavailable from observational scales. These results demonstrate the feasibility of video-based z-score estimation, excess-flexion screening, and longitudinal trajectory tracking as a path toward scalable, objective gait assessment in low-resource clinical settings.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper claims to have developed a markerless pipeline using single-view sagittal clinical gait videos to directly estimate Rodda-Graham knee and ankle z-scores in a heterogeneous pediatric cohort (152 children, 60 diagnoses, 1,058 bilateral samples). It reports R² = 0.80 ± 0.02 and CCC = 0.89 ± 0.02 for knee z-scores and R² = 0.57 ± 0.02 and CCC = 0.72 ± 0.02 for ankle z-scores against 3D-IGA labels, plus AUROC = 0.88 for excess knee flexion screening and 43% 7-class accuracy, positioning the method as a scalable alternative for longitudinal monitoring.

Significance. If the central mapping holds after addressing validation gaps, the work offers a practical route to quantitative, low-cost gait assessment outside specialized 3D-IGA centers, with direct utility for CP and other pediatric movement disorders. The sizable multi-diagnosis cohort and explicit longitudinal-tracking framing are strengths that could support broader adoption if reproducibility is demonstrated.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and Results: Ankle z-score performance (R² = 0.57 ± 0.02, CCC = 0.72 ± 0.02) is substantially weaker than knee and is identified as the primary bottleneck, yet no analysis of view sufficiency (e.g., sensitivity to out-of-plane foot progression or markerless pose ambiguity) or failure-case stratification is provided; this directly limits the claim that the full Rodda-Graham system can be quantified from single-view video.
  2. [Results] Results: Despite the cohort spanning 60 distinct primary diagnoses (CP n=54), no diagnosis-stratified metrics or leave-one-diagnosis-out validation are reported; without these, it is impossible to distinguish genuine generalization from exploitation of CP-dominant patterns, which is load-bearing for the heterogeneous-cohort claim.
  3. [Methods] Methods (inferred from abstract description): No details are given on the pose-estimation backbone, 2D-to-3D kinematic derivation, regression architecture for z-score prediction, training procedure, or cross-validation scheme; these omissions prevent assessment of whether the reported correlations are robust or overfit to the 3D-IGA labels.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: Mathematical notation (R², CCC, AUROC) is inconsistently formatted; consistent use of proper math mode or inline symbols would improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their detailed and constructive review. We address each major comment below and have prepared revisions to strengthen the manuscript where the concerns are valid.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and Results: Ankle z-score performance (R² = 0.57 ± 0.02, CCC = 0.72 ± 0.02) is substantially weaker than knee and is identified as the primary bottleneck, yet no analysis of view sufficiency (e.g., sensitivity to out-of-plane foot progression or markerless pose ambiguity) or failure-case stratification is provided; this directly limits the claim that the full Rodda-Graham system can be quantified from single-view video.

    Authors: We agree that ankle performance remains the primary bottleneck and that the single sagittal view inherently limits information on out-of-plane foot progression and introduces pose ambiguity for distal segments. The original manuscript already flags ankle error as the limiting factor for full 7-class Rodda-Graham accuracy. In revision we will add (i) failure-case stratification by pose-estimation confidence and foot-progression angle, and (ii) an explicit discussion of view-sufficiency constraints, thereby tempering the claim to emphasize screening utility while acknowledging that complete Rodda-Graham quantification from a single sagittal view is not yet achieved. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results] Results: Despite the cohort spanning 60 distinct primary diagnoses (CP n=54), no diagnosis-stratified metrics or leave-one-diagnosis-out validation are reported; without these, it is impossible to distinguish genuine generalization from exploitation of CP-dominant patterns, which is load-bearing for the heterogeneous-cohort claim.

    Authors: The manuscript highlights the 60-diagnosis composition as a strength, yet we acknowledge that CP (n=54) is the largest single group and that aggregate metrics alone cannot rule out CP-specific pattern exploitation. In the revised manuscript we will report performance stratified by the most frequent diagnostic categories and include a leave-one-diagnosis-out (or leave-one-major-diagnosis-out) validation experiment to quantify generalization beyond the CP-dominant subset. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Methods] Methods (inferred from abstract description): No details are given on the pose-estimation backbone, 2D-to-3D kinematic derivation, regression architecture for z-score prediction, training procedure, or cross-validation scheme; these omissions prevent assessment of whether the reported correlations are robust or overfit to the 3D-IGA labels.

    Authors: We regret that the methods section in the initial submission was insufficiently detailed. The full manuscript describes a markerless pipeline that derives 3D kinematics from single-view video, but we will expand it substantially to specify the pose-estimation backbone, the 2D-to-3D lifting procedure, the regression architecture and loss for z-score prediction, training hyperparameters, and the subject-wise cross-validation scheme. These additions will enable readers to evaluate robustness and potential overfitting. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; supervised ML mapping validated on external 3D-IGA labels

full rationale

The paper trains models to regress knee and ankle z-scores from single-view video kinematics, using 3D-IGA as ground-truth labels across 1,058 samples. Reported R² and CCC values are standard held-out validation metrics, not derivations that reduce to inputs by construction. No equations, ansatzes, or self-citations are invoked to force outputs; the lower ankle performance is explicitly noted as a limitation. The derivation chain is a data-driven predictor with independent external benchmark, yielding no load-bearing circular steps.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Review performed on abstract only; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are stated. The pipeline implicitly relies on standard supervised learning assumptions and the validity of 3D-IGA as ground truth.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5757 in / 1197 out tokens · 44039 ms · 2026-05-13T05:48:03.047420+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 52 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    A report: the definition and classification of cerebral palsy April 2006

    Rosenbaum P, Paneth N, Leviton A, Goldstein M, Bax M, Damiano D, et al. A report: the definition and classification of cerebral palsy April 2006. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology Supplement. 2007;109:8–14

    work page 2006

  2. [2]

    An update on the prevalence of cerebral palsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Oskoui M, Coutinho F, Dykeman J, Jett´ e N, Pringsheim T. An update on the prevalence of cerebral palsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology. 2013;55(6):509–519. doi:10.1111/dmcn.12080

    work page doi:10.1111/dmcn.12080 2013

  3. [3]

    Gait analysis in children with cerebral palsy

    Armand S, Decoulon G, Bonnefoy-Mazure A. Gait analysis in children with cerebral palsy. EFORT Open Reviews. 2016;1(12):448–460. doi:10.1302/2058-5241.1.000052

    work page doi:10.1302/2058-5241.1.000052 2016

  4. [4]

    Walking Ability, Participation, and Quality of Life in Children with Spastic Diplegic Cerebral Palsy: A Path Analysis Study

    Vameghi R, Hoseini SA, Heydarian S, Azadeh H, Gharib M. Walking Ability, Participation, and Quality of Life in Children with Spastic Diplegic Cerebral Palsy: A Path Analysis Study. Iranian Journal of Child Neurology. 2023;17(2):75–91. doi:10.22037/ijcn.v17i1.34924

    work page doi:10.22037/ijcn.v17i1.34924 2023

  5. [5]

    Musculoskeletal Pathology in Cerebral Palsy: A Classification System and Reliability Study

    Graham HK, Thomason P, Willoughby K, Hastings-Ison T, Stralen RV, Dala-Ali B, et al. Musculoskeletal Pathology in Cerebral Palsy: A Classification System and Reliability Study. Children. 2021;8(3):252. doi:10.3390/children8030252

    work page doi:10.3390/children8030252 2021

  6. [6]

    Prognostic predictors for ambulation in children with cerebral palsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

    Keeratisiroj O, Thawinchai N, Siritaratiwat W, Buntragulpoontawee M, Pratoomsoot C. Prognostic predictors for ambulation in children with cerebral palsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Disability and Rehabilitation. 2018;40(2):135–143. doi:10.1080/09638288.2016.1250119

    work page doi:10.1080/09638288.2016.1250119 2018

  7. [7]

    The Effect of Preoperative Gait Analysis on Orthopaedic Decision Making

    Kay RM, Dennis S, Rethlefsen S, Reynolds RAK, Skaggs DL, Tolo VT. The Effect of Preoperative Gait Analysis on Orthopaedic Decision Making. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 2000;372:217–222. doi:10.1097/00003086-200003000-00023

    work page doi:10.1097/00003086-200003000-00023 2000

  8. [8]

    Clinical gait analysis 1973–2023: Evaluating progress to guide the future

    Stebbins J, Harrington M, Stewart C. Clinical gait analysis 1973–2023: Evaluating progress to guide the future. Journal of Biomechanics. 2023;160:111827. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2023.111827

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2023.111827 1973

  9. [9]

    Efficacy of clinical gait analysis: A systematic review

    Wren TAL, Gorton GE, ˜Ounpuu S, Tucker CA. Efficacy of clinical gait analysis: A systematic review. Gait & Posture. 2011;34(2):149–153. doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.03.027

    work page doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.03.027 2011

  10. [10]

    Classification of gait patterns in spastic hemiplegia and spastic diplegia: a basis for a management algorithm

    Rodda J, Graham HK. Classification of gait patterns in spastic hemiplegia and spastic diplegia: a basis for a management algorithm. European Journal of Neurology. 2001;8 Suppl 5:98–108. doi:10.1046/j.1468-1331.2001.00042.x

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1468-1331.2001.00042.x 2001

  11. [11]

    Sagittal gait patterns in cerebral palsy: The plantarflexor–knee extension couple index

    Sangeux M, Rodda J, Graham HK. Sagittal gait patterns in cerebral palsy: The plantarflexor–knee extension couple index. Gait & Posture. 2015;41(2):586–591. doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.12.019

    work page doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.12.019 2015

  12. [12]

    Sagittal gait patterns in spastic diplegia

    Rodda JM, Graham HK, Carson L, Galea MP, Wolfe R. Sagittal gait patterns in spastic diplegia. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery British Volume. 2004;86-B(2):251–258. doi:10.1302/0301-620x.86b2.13878. May 13, 2026 25/29

    work page doi:10.1302/0301-620x.86b2.13878 2004

  13. [13]

    The Shriners Children’s Gait Model (SCGM)

    Kruger KM, Fischer P, Augsburger S, Feng J, Girouard JF, Gregory DL, et al. The Shriners Children’s Gait Model (SCGM). Gait & Posture. 2024;110:84–109. doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2024.03.006

    work page doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2024.03.006 2024

  14. [14]

    Reliability of visual classification of sagittal gait patterns in patients with bilateral spastic cerebral palsy

    Kim DJ, Park ES, Sim EG, Kim KJ, Kim YU, Rha DW. Reliability of visual classification of sagittal gait patterns in patients with bilateral spastic cerebral palsy. Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2011;35(3):354–360. doi:10.5535/arm.2011.35.3.354

    work page doi:10.5535/arm.2011.35.3.354 2011

  15. [15]

    A review of observational gait assessment in clinical practice

    Toro B, Nester C, Farren P. A review of observational gait assessment in clinical practice. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice. 2003;19(3):137–149. doi:10.1080/09593980307964

    work page doi:10.1080/09593980307964 2003

  16. [16]

    Interrater reliability of videotaped observational gait-analysis assessments

    Eastlack ME, Arvidson J, Snyder-Mackler L, Danoff JV, McGarvey CL. Interrater reliability of videotaped observational gait-analysis assessments. Physical Therapy. 1991;71(6):465–472. doi:10.1093/ptj/71.6.465

    work page doi:10.1093/ptj/71.6.465 1991

  17. [17]

    Application of Deep Learning Models in Classification of Sagittal Gait Patterns Based on Rodda’s Classification System in Patients with Cerebral Palsy

    Mazidi AA, Banihashemi M, Jamshidian A, Shojaeefard M, Taheri A, Farahmand F. Application of Deep Learning Models in Classification of Sagittal Gait Patterns Based on Rodda’s Classification System in Patients with Cerebral Palsy. In: 2024 31st National and 9th International Iranian Conference on Biomedical Engineering (ICBME); 2024. p. 289–295

    work page 2024

  18. [18]

    Kim YK, Visscher RMS, Viehweger E, Singh NB, Taylor WR, Vogl F. A deep-learning approach for automatically detecting gait-events based on foot-marker kinematics in children with cerebral palsy—Which markers work best for which gait patterns? PLOS ONE. 2022;17(10):e0275878. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0275878

    work page doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0275878 2022

  19. [19]

    Deep neural networks enable quantitative movement analysis using single-camera videos

    Kidzi´ nski L, Yang B, Hicks JL, Rajagopal A, Delp SL, Schwartz MH. Deep neural networks enable quantitative movement analysis using single-camera videos. Nature Communications. 2020;11(1):4054. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-17807-z

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-020-17807-z 2020

  20. [20]

    OpenPose: Realtime Multi-Person 2D Pose Estimation Using Part Affinity Fields

    Cao Z, Hidalgo Martinez G, Simon T, Wei SE, Sheikh YA. OpenPose: Realtime Multi-Person 2D Pose Estimation Using Part Affinity Fields. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. 2021;43(1):172–186. doi:10.1109/TPAMI.2019.2929257

    work page doi:10.1109/tpami.2019.2929257 2021

  21. [21]

    Pantzar-Castilla E, Balta D, Croce UD, Cereatti A, Riad J. Feasibility and usefulness of video-based markerless two-dimensional automated gait analysis, in providing objective quantification of gait and complementing the evaluation of gait in children with cerebral palsy. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2024;25(1):747. doi:10.1186/s12891-024-07853-9

    work page doi:10.1186/s12891-024-07853-9 2024

  22. [22]

    Motor Function Assessment of Children with Cerebral Palsy using Monocular Video

    Zhao P, Alencastre-Miranda M, Shen Z, O’Neill C, Whiteman D, Gervas-Arruga J. Motor Function Assessment of Children with Cerebral Palsy using Monocular Video. In: 2023 IEEE 19th International Conference on Body Sensor Networks (BSN); 2023. p. 1–4

    work page 2023

  23. [23]

    Spatial Temporal Graph Convolutional Networks for Skeleton-Based Action Recognition

    Yan S, Xiong Y, Lin D. Spatial Temporal Graph Convolutional Networks for Skeleton-Based Action Recognition. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. vol. 32; 2018. p. 7444–7452

    work page 2018

  24. [24]

    Algorithm based on one monocular video delivers highly valid and reliable gait parameters

    Azhand A, Rabe S, M¨ uller S, Sattler I, Heimann-Steinert A. Algorithm based on one monocular video delivers highly valid and reliable gait parameters. Scientific Reports. 2021;11(1):14065. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-93530-z. May 13, 2026 26/29

    work page doi:10.1038/s41598-021-93530-z 2021

  25. [25]

    Development and reliability of a system to classify gross motor function in children with cerebral palsy

    Palisano R, Rosenbaum P, Walter S, Russell D, Wood E, Galuppi B. Development and reliability of a system to classify gross motor function in children with cerebral palsy. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology. 1997;39(4):214–223. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8749.1997.tb07414.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1469-8749.1997.tb07414.x 1997

  26. [26]

    Variation in kinematic and spatiotemporal gait parameters by Gross Motor Function Classification System level in children and adolescents with cerebral palsy

    ˜Ounpuu S, Gorton G, Bagley A, Sison-Williamson M, Hassani S, Johnson B, et al. Variation in kinematic and spatiotemporal gait parameters by Gross Motor Function Classification System level in children and adolescents with cerebral palsy. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology. 2015;57(10):955–962. doi:10.1111/dmcn.12766

    work page doi:10.1111/dmcn.12766 2015

  27. [27]

    Deep Convolutional and LSTM Recurrent Neural Networks for Multimodal Wearable Activity Recognition

    Ord´ o˜ nez FJ, Roggen D. Deep Convolutional and LSTM Recurrent Neural Networks for Multimodal Wearable Activity Recognition. Sensors. 2016;16(1):115. doi:10.3390/s16010115

    work page doi:10.3390/s16010115 2016

  28. [28]

    Two-Stream Adaptive Graph Convolutional Networks for Skeleton-Based Action Recognition

    Shi L, Zhang Y, Cheng J, Lu H. Two-Stream Adaptive Graph Convolutional Networks for Skeleton-Based Action Recognition. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)

    work page

  29. [29]

    An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale

    Dosovitskiy A, Beyer L, Kolesnikov A, Weissenborn D, Zhai X, Unterthiner T, et al. An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale. In: International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR); 2021

    work page 2021

  30. [30]

    MeTRAbs: Metric-Scale Truncation-Robust Heatmaps for Absolute 3D Human Pose Estimation

    S´ ar´ andi I, Linder T, Arras KO, Leibe B. MeTRAbs: Metric-Scale Truncation-Robust Heatmaps for Absolute 3D Human Pose Estimation. IEEE Transactions on Biometrics, Behavior, and Identity Science. 2021;3(1):16–30. doi:10.1109/TBIOM.2020.3037257

    work page doi:10.1109/tbiom.2020.3037257 2021

  31. [31]

    Learning 3D Human Pose Estimation from Dozens of Datasets using a Geometry-Aware Autoencoder to Bridge Between Skeleton Formats

    S´ ar´ andi I, Hermans A, Leibe B. Learning 3D Human Pose Estimation from Dozens of Datasets using a Geometry-Aware Autoencoder to Bridge Between Skeleton Formats. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV); 2023. p. 2955–2965

    work page 2023

  32. [32]

    MoVi: A large multi-purpose human motion and video dataset

    Ghorbani S, Mahdaviani K, Thaler A, Kording K, Cook DJ, Blohm G, et al. MoVi: A large multi-purpose human motion and video dataset. PLOS ONE. 2021;16(6):e0253157. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0253157

    work page doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0253157 2021

  33. [33]

    The frequency content of gait

    Antonsson EK, Mann RW. The frequency content of gait. Journal of Biomechanics. 1985;18(1):39–47. doi:10.1016/0021-9290(85)90043-0

    work page doi:10.1016/0021-9290(85)90043-0 1985

  34. [34]

    ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate system of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion—part I: ankle, hip, and spine

    Wu G, Siegler S, Allard P, Kirtley C, Leardini A, Rosenbaum D, et al. ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate system of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion—part I: ankle, hip, and spine. Journal of Biomechanics. 2002;35(4):543–548. doi:10.1016/S0021-9290(01)00222-6

    work page doi:10.1016/s0021-9290(01)00222-6 2002

  35. [35]

    Gait Analysis: Normal and Pathological Function

    Perry J, Burnfield JM. Gait Analysis: Normal and Pathological Function. 2nd ed. Thorofare, NJ: SLACK Incorporated; 2010

    work page 2010

  36. [36]

    Gait analysis methods in rehabilitation

    Baker R. Gait analysis methods in rehabilitation. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation. 2006;3:4. doi:10.1186/1743-0003-3-4

    work page doi:10.1186/1743-0003-3-4 2006

  37. [37]

    A gait analysis data collection and reduction technique

    Davis RB III, ˜Ounpuu S, Tyburski D, Gage JR. A gait analysis data collection and reduction technique. Human Movement Science. 1991;10(5):575–587. doi:10.1016/0167-9457(91)90046-Z. May 13, 2026 27/29

    work page doi:10.1016/0167-9457(91)90046-z 1991

  38. [38]

    Measurement of lower extremity kinematics during level walking

    Kadaba MP, Ramakrishnan HK, Wootten ME. Measurement of lower extremity kinematics during level walking. Journal of Orthopaedic Research. 1990;8(3):383–392. doi:10.1002/jor.1100080310

    work page doi:10.1002/jor.1100080310 1990

  39. [39]

    An Explainable Spatial-Temporal Graphical Convolutional Network to Score Freezing of Gait in Parkinsonian Patients

    Kwon H, Clifford GD, Genias I, Bernhard D, Esper CD, Factor SA, et al. An Explainable Spatial-Temporal Graphical Convolutional Network to Score Freezing of Gait in Parkinsonian Patients. Sensors. 2023;23(4):1766. doi:10.3390/s23041766

    work page doi:10.3390/s23041766 2023

  40. [40]

    Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networks

    Kipf TN, Welling M. Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networks. In: International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR); 2017

    work page 2017

  41. [41]

    Crouch Gait in Cerebral Palsy: Current Concepts Review

    Pandey RA, Johari AN, Shetty T. Crouch Gait in Cerebral Palsy: Current Concepts Review. Indian Journal of Orthopaedics. 2023;57(12):1913–1926. doi:10.1007/s43465-023-01002-5

    work page doi:10.1007/s43465-023-01002-5 2023

  42. [42]

    Are Clinical Impairments Related to Kinematic Gait Variability in Children and Young Adults With Cerebral Palsy? Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

    Tabard-Foug` ere A, Rutz D, Pouliot-Laforte A, De Coulon G, Newman CJ, Armand S, et al. Are Clinical Impairments Related to Kinematic Gait Variability in Children and Young Adults With Cerebral Palsy? Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2022;16:816088. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2022.816088

    work page doi:10.3389/fnhum.2022.816088 2022

  43. [43]

    Hochreiter and J

    Hochreiter S, Schmidhuber J. Long Short-Term Memory. Neural Computation. 1997;9(8):1735–1780. doi:10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735

    work page doi:10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 1997

  44. [44]

    Deep, Convolutional, and Recurrent Models for Human Activity Recognition Using Wearables

    Hammerla NY, Halloran S, Pl¨ otz T. Deep, Convolutional, and Recurrent Models for Human Activity Recognition Using Wearables. In: Proceedings of the 25th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI); 2016. p. 1533–1540

    work page 2016

  45. [45]

    Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Framework

    Akiba T, Sano S, Yanase T, Ohta T, Koyama M. Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Framework. In: Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining (KDD); 2019. p. 2623–2631

    work page 2019

  46. [46]

    Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization

    Kingma DP, Ba J. Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization. In: International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR); 2015

    work page 2015

  47. [47]

    Prevalence of specific gait abnormalities in children with cerebral palsy revisited: influence of age, prior surgery, and Gross Motor Function Classification System level

    Rethlefsen SA, Blumstein G, Kay RM, Dorey F, Wren TAL. Prevalence of specific gait abnormalities in children with cerebral palsy revisited: influence of age, prior surgery, and Gross Motor Function Classification System level. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology. 2017;59(1):79–88. doi:10.1111/dmcn.13205

    work page doi:10.1111/dmcn.13205 2017

  48. [48]

    Delving into Deep Imbalanced Regression

    Yang Y, Zha K, Chen Y, Wang H, Katabi D. Delving into Deep Imbalanced Regression. In: Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML). vol. 139 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research. PMLR

    work page

  49. [49]

    Assessing the Performance of Prediction Models: A Framework for Traditional and Novel Measures

    Steyerberg EW, Vickers AJ, Cook NR, Gerds T, Gonen M, Obuchowski N, et al. Assessing the Performance of Prediction Models: A Framework for Traditional and Novel Measures. Epidemiology. 2010;21(1):128–138. doi:10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181c30fb7

    work page doi:10.1097/ede.0b013e3181c30fb7 2010

  50. [50]

    Concurrent assessment of gait kinematics using marker-based and markerless motion capture

    Kanko RM, Laende EK, Davis EM, Selbie WS, Deluzio KJ. Concurrent assessment of gait kinematics using marker-based and markerless motion capture. Journal of Biomechanics. 2021;127:110665. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110665. May 13, 2026 28/29

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110665 2021

  51. [51]

    Using deep neural networks for kinematic analysis: Challenges and opportunities

    Cronin NJ. Using deep neural networks for kinematic analysis: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Biomechanics. 2021;123:110460. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110460

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110460 2021

  52. [52]

    CHEF-VL: Detecting Cognitive Sequencing Errors in Cooking with Vision-Language Models

    Wang R, Gao P, Lynch P, Liu T, Lee Y, Baum CM, et al. CHEF-VL: Detecting Cognitive Sequencing Errors in Cooking with Vision-Language Models. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies. 2025;doi:10.1145/3770714. Supplementary Supplementary T able 1. F ull primary-diagnosis breakdown of the 152-child cohort.Counts an...

    work page doi:10.1145/3770714 2025