pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.11364 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-12 · 🌀 gr-qc

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Bardeen spacetime as quantum corrected black hole: Grey-body factors and quasinormal modes of gravitational perturbations

Bekir Can L\"utf\"uo\u{g}lu , Javlon Rayimbaev , Sardor Murodov , Jakhongir Kurbanov , Muhammad Matyoqubov
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 02:35 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc
keywords Bardeen spacetimequasinormal modesgrey-body factorsgravitational perturbationsquantum correctionsRegge-Wheeler potentialblack hole ringdownabsorption cross-section
1
0 comments X

The pith

Treating Bardeen spacetime as a quantum-corrected black hole shows larger correction scales produce higher-frequency, slower-damped gravitational ringdowns and altered scattering.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that the Bardeen metric, when interpreted through string T-duality as a quantum-corrected Schwarzschild black hole, carries observable effects into its axial gravitational perturbations. Starting from the anisotropic-fluid background, the authors derive a Regge-Wheeler-type master equation whose effective potential grows taller and moves inward as the correction scale ℓ0 increases. This deformation shifts the quasinormal spectrum toward higher real frequencies with reduced imaginary parts, while suppressing low-frequency transmission and shifting the onset of grey-body factors. A reader would care because these changes link short-distance regularization directly to ringdown and scattering observables that future detectors might measure.

Core claim

The authors derive the Regge-Wheeler-type master equation for axial perturbations on the Bardeen background and demonstrate that the quantum-correction parameter ℓ0 controls the height and position of the potential barrier. Numerical computations using WKB-Padé approximation and time-domain evolution confirm that increasing ℓ0 raises the real parts of the quasinormal frequencies while decreasing their imaginary parts, indicating faster oscillation and slower decay. The same parameter suppresses the grey-body transmission probabilities at low frequencies and reorganizes the partial and total absorption cross-sections.

What carries the argument

The effective potential appearing in the Regge-Wheeler master equation for axial gravitational perturbations of the Bardeen metric, which is modulated by the quantum-correction scale ℓ0.

If this is right

  • Larger values of the quantum-correction scale ℓ0 produce quasinormal modes with higher real frequencies and smaller imaginary parts.
  • Perturbations decay more slowly as the correction scale increases.
  • Grey-body factors are suppressed at low frequencies and their onset moves to higher frequencies.
  • Both partial-wave contributions and the total absorption cross-section become reorganized.
  • The changes supply a consistent imprint of short-distance regularization on ringdown and scattering observables.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Ringdown measurements in gravitational-wave data could be used to place upper bounds on the allowed size of ℓ0 for small black holes.
  • The same deformation pattern may appear in other regular black-hole metrics that share a similar short-distance regularization structure.
  • Linear perturbation analysis on this background assumes that back-reaction remains negligible, so any nonlinear test would need separate verification.

Load-bearing premise

The Bardeen metric with anisotropic fluid can be consistently interpreted as a string-T-duality-inspired quantum-corrected Schwarzschild black hole whose short-distance regularization directly controls the perturbation potential without additional back-reaction effects.

What would settle it

A time-domain integration of the master equation that shows no increase in real frequency or decrease in damping rate when ℓ0 is raised from zero would falsify the reported dependence of the quasinormal spectrum on the correction scale.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.11364 by Bekir Can L\"utf\"uo\u{g}lu, Jakhongir Kurbanov, Javlon Rayimbaev, Muhammad Matyoqubov, Sardor Murodov.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Representative axial effective potentials [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Time-domain profile of the axial gravitational perturbation for the Bardeen black hole with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: In this sense the late-time signal follows the stan [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Quality factor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Comparison of the GBFs for axial gravitational perturbations of the quantum-corrected Bardeen black hole with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Comparison of the GBFs for axial gravitational perturbations of the quantum-corrected Bardeen black hole with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Partial and total ACSs for axial gravitational perturbations of the quantum-corrected Bardeen black hole with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We study axial gravitational perturbations of the asymptotically flat Bardeen spacetime interpreted as a string-T-duality-inspired quantum-corrected Schwarzschild black hole. Starting from the anisotropic-fluid background, we derive the Regge--Wheeler-type master equation and the corresponding effective potential, and compute quasinormal modes with high-order WKB--Pad\'e and time-domain methods. We show that increasing the quantum-correction scale $\ell_0$ raises and shifts the barrier inward, causing the black hole to ring at higher frequencies and decay more slowly. The same deformation suppresses low-frequency transmission, shifts the onset of grey-body factors to larger frequencies, and reorganizes the partial and total absorption cross-sections. Overall, the results identify a clear and consistent imprint of short-distance regularization on both ringdown and scattering observables.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript examines axial gravitational perturbations of the Bardeen spacetime, interpreted as a quantum-corrected Schwarzschild black hole inspired by string T-duality. From the anisotropic fluid background, the authors derive a Regge-Wheeler-type master equation and effective potential. They compute quasinormal modes (QNMs) using high-order WKB-Padé and time-domain methods, and analyze grey-body factors along with absorption cross-sections. The key result is that increasing the quantum correction parameter ℓ₀ raises and shifts the potential barrier inward, leading to higher oscillation frequencies, slower damping, suppressed low-frequency transmission, and modified absorption cross-sections.

Significance. Should the central derivation hold, the work offers valuable insights into the effects of short-distance regularization on black hole ringdown and scattering observables. The employment of two independent computational methods for QNMs enhances confidence in those results. It contributes to the study of regular black holes and their potential observational signatures in gravitational waves and scattering processes.

major comments (1)
  1. [Derivation of the Regge-Wheeler-type master equation] The background metric is sourced by an anisotropic fluid, yet the derived master equation is presented as the standard vacuum Regge-Wheeler form whose effective potential depends solely on the metric function f(r) and its derivatives. For dynamical matter, axial gravitational perturbations generally couple to fluid perturbations, which could introduce additional terms dependent on the fluid equation of state and sound speed. The headline claims regarding the direct impact of ℓ₀ on the QNM spectrum and grey-body factors rely on the potential being unmodified by such couplings. This assumption requires explicit verification or derivation in the manuscript to confirm its validity.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract does not provide error bars, convergence checks, or details on the numerical accuracy of the QNM frequencies and grey-body factors, which would help assess the reliability of the reported trends.
  2. [Throughout] Ensure consistent notation for the effective potential and the complex frequencies ω, with clear definitions and perhaps a table of sample values for different ℓ₀ to aid reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful review and for raising this important point regarding the validity of the master equation in the presence of the anisotropic fluid. We address the concern below and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The background metric is sourced by an anisotropic fluid, yet the derived master equation is presented as the standard vacuum Regge-Wheeler form whose effective potential depends solely on the metric function f(r) and its derivatives. For dynamical matter, axial gravitational perturbations generally couple to fluid perturbations, which could introduce additional terms dependent on the fluid equation of state and sound speed. The headline claims regarding the direct impact of ℓ₀ on the QNM spectrum and grey-body factors rely on the potential being unmodified by such couplings. This assumption requires explicit verification or derivation in the manuscript to confirm its validity.

    Authors: We appreciate this comment. In Section III, the master equation is obtained by linearizing the Einstein equations sourced by the anisotropic fluid stress-energy tensor. For axial perturbations, the symmetry of the background and the diagonal structure of the fluid tensor ensure that fluid perturbations decouple; no additional terms involving the sound speed or equation of state enter the gravitational sector. The resulting equation is therefore the standard Regge-Wheeler form whose potential depends only on f(r) and its derivatives. In the revised manuscript we will expand the derivation to display the decoupling explicitly, confirming that the reported dependence on ℓ₀ remains unchanged. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper starts from the given Bardeen metric (with anisotropic fluid source and quantum-correction scale ℓ0), explicitly derives the Regge-Wheeler-type master equation and effective potential from the metric function f(r) and its derivatives, then computes QNMs via high-order WKB-Padé and time-domain integration plus grey-body factors via standard scattering methods. No parameter is fitted to a data subset and then relabeled as a prediction; no load-bearing self-citation chain justifies the central premise; the claimed effects of ℓ0 on barrier height, ringdown frequencies, decay rates, and transmission coefficients are direct numerical consequences of the modified potential rather than redefinitions or tautologies. The derivation remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claim rests on the standard derivation of the Regge-Wheeler equation for axial perturbations in a static spherically symmetric metric and on the given Bardeen line element as a valid quantum-corrected background; no additional free parameters beyond ℓ0 are introduced in the abstract.

free parameters (1)
  • ℓ0
    Quantum-correction length scale that deforms the metric and effective potential; its value is varied parametrically rather than fitted to external data.
axioms (2)
  • standard math Axial gravitational perturbations obey a Regge-Wheeler-type master equation derived from the Einstein equations on the given background
    Invoked when the authors state they start from the anisotropic-fluid background and derive the master equation.
  • domain assumption The Bardeen metric provides a consistent short-distance regularization of the Schwarzschild solution
    The entire interpretation as string-T-duality-inspired quantum-corrected black hole rests on this premise.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5469 in / 1419 out tokens · 46569 ms · 2026-05-13T02:35:15.291827+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

138 extracted references · 138 canonical work pages · 4 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    (45) For the fixed value ℓ0 = 0 .769 used in Table IV, the outer solution of Eq

    (44) = f (rph) 2r2 ph 2f (rph) − r2 phf ′′(rph) . (45) For the fixed value ℓ0 = 0 .769 used in Table IV, the outer solution of Eq. (41) is rph ≃ 2.30360 M , which gives ΩcM ≃ 0.220941 and λcM ≃ 0.156021. Therefore, for the fundamental mode, ωℓ0M ≃ 0.220941 ℓ + 1 2 − 0.078011 i. (46) Comparison with Table IV shows that the eikonal for- mula converges monoto...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Consequently, the transmission curves shift to the right as ℓ0 increases, and the ℓ = 3 channels turn on later than the ℓ = 2 channels

    Because both increasing ℓ and increasing ℓ0 raise the characteristic barrier height, the condition Ω2 ∼ V max ax is reached only at larger frequencies. Consequently, the transmission curves shift to the right as ℓ0 increases, and the ℓ = 3 channels turn on later than the ℓ = 2 channels. The same barrier ordering explains the stronger suppres- sion of the ...

    work page 2025

  3. [3]

    B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 061102 (2016)

    work page 2016

  4. [4]

    K. D. Kokkotas and B. G. Schmidt, Living Rev. Relativ. 2, 2 (1999)

    work page 1999

  5. [5]

    Berti, V

    E. Berti, V. Cardoso, and A. O. Starinets, Class. Quan- tum Grav. 26, 163001 (2009)

    work page 2009

  6. [6]

    S. V. Bolokhov and M. Skvortsova, Grav. Cosmol. 31, 423 (2025), arXiv:2504.05014 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  7. [7]

    R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, JHEAp 44, 419 (2024), arXiv:2209.00679 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  8. [8]

    Kanti and J

    P. Kanti and J. March-Russell, Phys. Rev. D 66, 024023 (2002), arXiv:hep-ph/0203223

    work page arXiv 2002

  9. [10]

    D. N. Page, Phys. Rev. D 14, 3260 (1976)

    work page 1976

  10. [11]

    S. W. Hawking, Commun. Math. Phys. 43, 199 (1975)

    work page 1975

  11. [14]

    B. C. Lütfüoğlu, Eur. Phys. J. C 86, 39 (2026)

    work page 2026

  12. [15]

    J. M. Bardeen, in Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Gravitation and the Theory of Relativity (Tbilisi, USSR, 1968) p. 174

    work page 1968

  13. [16]

    Ayón-Beato and A

    E. Ayón-Beato and A. García, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 5056 (1998)

    work page 1998

  14. [17]

    Ayón-Beato and A

    E. Ayón-Beato and A. García, Phys. Lett. B 493, 149 (2000)

    work page 2000

  15. [18]

    Toshmatov, Z

    B. Toshmatov, Z. Stuchlík, and B. Ahmedov, Phys. Rev. D 98, 085021 (2018), arXiv:1810.06383 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2018

  16. [19]

    Toshmatov, Z

    B. Toshmatov, Z. Stuchlík, B. Ahmedov, and D. Malafarina, Phys. Rev. D 99, 064043 (2019), arXiv:1903.03778 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2019

  17. [20]

    Rincón and V

    A. Rincón and V. Santos, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 910 (2020)

    work page 2020

  18. [21]

    Dey and S

    S. Dey and S. Chakrabarti, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 504 (2019)

    work page 2019

  19. [22]

    Y. Zhao, W. Liu, C. Zhang, X. Fang, and J. Jing, Chin. Phys. C 48, 035102 (2024)

    work page 2024

  20. [23]

    R. A. Konoplya, JCAP 07, 001 (2023), arXiv:2305.09187 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  21. [24]

    K. Lin, J. Li, and S. Yang, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 52, 3771 (2013)

    work page 2013

  22. [25]

    Y. Yang, D. Liu, Z. Xu, Y. Xing, S. Wu, and Z.-W. Long, Phys. Rev. D 104, 104021 (2021), arXiv:2107.06554 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  23. [26]

    R. A. Konoplya, A. F. Zinhailo, J. Kunz, Z. Stuch- lik, and A. Zhidenko, JCAP 10, 091 (2022), arXiv:2206.14714 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  24. [27]

    Al-Badawi and A

    A. Al-Badawi and A. Kraishan, Chin. J. Phys. 87, 59 (2024)

    work page 2024

  25. [28]

    Pedraza, L

    O. Pedraza, L. A. López, R. Arceo, and I. Cabrera- Munguia, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 37, 2250057 (2022), arXiv:2111.06488 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  26. [29]

    Y. Guo, H. Xie, and Y.-G. Miao, Phys. Lett. B 855, 138801 (2024), arXiv:2402.10406 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  27. [30]

    E. U. Saka, (2025), arXiv:2512.08904 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  28. [31]

    R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, Phys. Rev. D 113, 043011 (2026), arXiv:2511.03066 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2026

  29. [32]

    A. Held, R. Gold, and A. Eichhorn, JCAP 06, 029 (2019), arXiv:1904.07133 [gr-qc]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2019

  30. [33]

    Mahdavian Yekta, M

    D. Mahdavian Yekta, M. Karimabadi, and S. A. Alavi, Annals Phys. 434, 168603 (2021), arXiv:1912.12017 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  31. [34]

    Quasinormal modes of regular black holes

    A. Flachi and J. P. S. Lemos, Phys. Rev. D 87, 024034 (2013), arXiv:1211.6212 [gr-qc]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2013

  32. [35]

    Skvortsova, (2026), arXiv:2603.28415 [gr-qc]

    M. Skvortsova, (2026), arXiv:2603.28415 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2026

  33. [36]

    Cai and Y.-G

    X.-C. Cai and Y.-G. Miao, Phys. Rev. D 103, 124050 (2021), arXiv:2104.09725 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  34. [37]

    Jawad, M

    A. Jawad, M. Yasir, and S. Rani, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 35, 2050298 (2020)

    work page 2020

  35. [38]

    R. A. Konoplya, Z. Stuchlik, A. Zhidenko, and A. F. Zinhailo, Phys. Rev. D 107, 104050 (2023), arXiv:2303.01987 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  36. [39]

    Jusufi, M

    K. Jusufi, M. Azreg-Aïnou, M. Jamil, S.-W. Wei, Q. Wu, and A. Wang, Phys. Rev. D 103, 024013 (2021), arXiv:2008.08450 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  37. [40]

    Zhang, H

    D. Zhang, H. Gong, G. Fu, J.-P. Wu, and Q. Pan, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 564 (2024), arXiv:2402.15085 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  38. [41]

    Quasinormal Modes of Bardeen Black Hole: Scalar Perturbations

    S. Fernando and J. Correa, Phys. Rev. D 86, 064039 (2012), arXiv:1208.5442 [gr-qc]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2012

  39. [42]

    L. A. López and V. Ramírez, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 138, 120 (2023), arXiv:2205.10166 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  40. [43]

    Dutta Roy and S

    P. Dutta Roy and S. Kar, Phys. Rev. D 106, 044028 (2022), arXiv:2206.04505 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  41. [44]

    R. A. Konoplya, D. Ovchinnikov, and B. Ahmedov, Phys. Rev. D 108, 104054 (2023), arXiv:2307.10801 [gr- qc]. 14

    work page arXiv 2023

  42. [46]

    Huang, H.-W

    B.-H. Huang, H.-W. Hu, and L. Zhao, JCAP 03, 053 (2024), arXiv:2311.12286 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  43. [47]

    J. Li, K. Lin, and N. Yang, Eur. Phys. J. C 75, 131 (2015), arXiv:1409.5988 [gr-qc]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2015

  44. [48]

    Quasinormal modes from EFT of black hole perturbations with timelike scalar profile,

    S. Mukohyama, K. Takahashi, K. Tomikawa, and V. Yingcharoenrat, JCAP 07, 050 (2023), arXiv:2304.14304 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  45. [49]

    D. M. Gingrich, Phys. Rev. D 110, 084045 (2024), arXiv:2404.04447 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  46. [50]

    R. A. Konoplya, Phys. Lett. B 876, 140386 (2026), arXiv:2603.03189 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2026

  47. [51]

    Skvortsova, (2025), arXiv:2509.18061 [gr-qc]

    M. Skvortsova, (2025), arXiv:2509.18061 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  48. [52]

    S. V. Bolokhov, Annals Phys. 488, 170416 (2026), arXiv:2511.12859 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2026

  49. [53]

    Dubinsky, Int

    A. Dubinsky, Int. J. Grav. Theor. Phys. 2, 6 (2026), arXiv:2603.17644 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2026

  50. [54]

    Toshmatov, C

    B. Toshmatov, C. Bambi, B. Ahmedov, Z. Stuch- lík, and J. Schee, Phys. Rev. D 96, 064028 (2017), arXiv:1705.03654 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2017

  51. [55]

    Asghar, M

    Z. Asghar, M. F. Shamir, F. Mofarreh, J. Rayimbaev, O. Sirajiddin, and F. Shayimov, Nucl. Phys. B 1025, 117417 (2026)

    work page 2026

  52. [56]

    Rahmatov, S

    B. Rahmatov, S. Murodov, J. Rayimbaev, Y. Turaev, I. Egamberdiev, K. Badalov, S. Ahmedov, and S. Us- anov, Annals Phys. 488, 170366 (2026)

    work page 2026

  53. [57]

    Nicolini, E

    P. Nicolini, E. Spallucci, and M. F. Wondrak, Phys. Lett. B 797, 134888 (2019), arXiv:1902.11242 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2019

  54. [58]

    S. V. Bolokhov, Phys. Rev. D 109, 064017 (2024)

    work page 2024

  55. [59]

    Saleh, B

    M. Saleh, B. B. Thomas, and T. C. Kofané, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 325 (2018)

    work page 2018

  56. [60]

    R. A. Konoplya and O. S. Stashko, Phys. Rev. D 111, 104055 (2025), arXiv:2408.02578 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  57. [61]

    B. C. Lütfüoğlu, E. U. Saka, A. Shermatov, J. Rayim- baev, I. Ibragimov, and S. Muminov, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 1190 (2025), arXiv:2509.15923 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  58. [62]

    Q.-L. Shi, R. Wang, W. Xiong, and P.-C. Li, Eur. Phys. J. C 86, 334 (2026), arXiv:2506.16217 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  59. [63]

    Padmanabhan, Phys

    T. Padmanabhan, Phys. Rev. D 57, 6206 (1998)

    work page 1998

  60. [64]

    Chakraborty, G

    S. Chakraborty, G. Compere, and L. Machet, Phys. Rev. D 112, 024015 (2025), arXiv:2412.14831 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  61. [65]

    Regge and J

    T. Regge and J. A. Wheeler, Phys. Rev. 108, 1063 (1957)

    work page 1957

  62. [66]

    Boonserm, T

    P. Boonserm, T. Ngampitipan, and M. Visser, Phys. Rev. D 88, 041502 (2013), arXiv:1305.1416 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2013

  63. [67]

    B. F. Schutz and C. M. Will, Astrophys. J. Lett. 291, L33 (1985)

    work page 1985

  64. [68]

    Iyer and C

    S. Iyer and C. M. Will, Phys. Rev. D 35, 3621 (1987)

    work page 1987

  65. [69]

    R. A. Konoplya, Phys. Rev. D 68, 024018 (2003), arXiv:gr-qc/0303052 [gr-qc]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2003

  66. [70]

    Matyjasek and M

    J. Matyjasek and M. Opala, Phys. Rev. D 96, 024011 (2017)

    work page 2017

  67. [71]

    R. A. Konoplya, Gen. Rel. Grav. 34, 329 (2002), arXiv:gr-qc/0109096

    work page arXiv 2002

  68. [72]

    S. V. Bolokhov and M. Skvortsova, Eur. Phys. J. C 86, 374 (2026), arXiv:2508.19989 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2026

  69. [73]

    D. S. Eniceicu and M. Reece, Phys. Rev. D 102, 044015 (2020), arXiv:1912.05553 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

  70. [74]

    R. A. Konoplya and A. F. Zinhailo, Phys. Rev. D 99, 104060 (2019), arXiv:1904.05341 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2019

  71. [75]

    Karmakar and U

    R. Karmakar and U. D. Goswami, Phys. Scripta 99, 055003 (2024), arXiv:2310.18594 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  72. [76]

    R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, Phys. Lett. B 648, 236 (2007), arXiv:hep-th/0611226

    work page Pith review arXiv 2007

  73. [77]

    Malik, Int

    Z. Malik, Int. J. Grav. Theor. Phys. 2, 3 (2026), arXiv:2603.18887 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2026

  74. [78]

    B. C. Lütfüoğlu, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 630 (2025), arXiv:2504.18482 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  75. [79]

    Quasinormal modes and absorption cross sections of Born-Infeld-de Sitter black holes

    N. Bretón, T. Clark, and S. Fernando, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 26, 1750112 (2017), arXiv:1703.10070 [gr-qc]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2017

  76. [80]

    Guo and Y.-G

    Y. Guo and Y.-G. Miao, Phys. Rev. D 102, 064049 (2020), arXiv:2005.07524 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  77. [81]

    R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, Phys. Lett. B 686, 199 (2010), arXiv:0909.2138 [hep-th]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2010

  78. [82]

    S. V. Bolokhov and M. Skvortsova, Int. J. Grav. Theor. Phys. 1, 3 (2025), arXiv:2507.07196 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  79. [83]

    Evolution of perturbations of squashed Kaluza-Klein black holes: escape from instability

    H. Ishihara, M. Kimura, R. A. Konoplya, K. Murata, J. Soda, and A. Zhidenko, Phys. Rev. D 77, 084019 (2008), arXiv:0802.0655 [hep-th]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2008

  80. [84]

    Wongjun, C.-H

    P. Wongjun, C.-H. Chen, and R. Nakarachinda, Phys. Rev. D 101, 124033 (2020), arXiv:1910.05908 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

Showing first 80 references.