pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.12604 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-12 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA

Recognition: no theorem link

SIMPLIFI -- Study of Interstellar Magnetic Polarization: a Legacy Investigation of Filaments. I. Magnetically-Guided Accretion onto the DR21 Ridge

Thushara G. S. Pillai , Jens Kauffmann , Juan D. Soler , Mark Heyer , Philip C. Myers , Laura M. Fissel , Dan Clemens , Koji Sugitani
show 10 more authors
Enrique Lopez-Rodriguez Fumitaka Nakamura Andrea Giannetti Daniel Seifried Paul F. Goldsmith Helmut Wiesemeyer Evangelia Ntormousi Gabriel Franco Stefan Reissl Karl M. Menten
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-14 20:20 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA
keywords interstellar magnetic fieldsmolecular cloud filamentsaccretionDR21 ridgepolarimetrySOFIAcolumn densitysub-Alfvenic gas
0
0 comments X

The pith

Projected gravity and magnetic fields remain aligned throughout the DR21 cloud at all densities

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The SIMPLIFI survey uses SOFIA polarimetry at 214 microns to map magnetic field directions from the dense DR21 Main Ridge into lower-density surrounding sub-filaments. The central result is that the plane-of-sky magnetic field stays aligned with the projected gravitational acceleration everywhere in the cloud, independent of column density and local environment. This alignment contrasts with the intensity gradient, whose orientation relative to the field shifts from parallel in the sub-filaments to perpendicular in the ridge above a column density of roughly 2 times 10 to the 22 per square centimeter. The persistent match supports a picture in which magnetic fields channel gas flows along the sub-filaments toward the ridge. The implied accretion rates of several thousandths of a solar mass per year are high enough to assemble the ridge structure in about one million years and to explain why measured radial velocities fall well below free-fall values.

Core claim

Our central finding is that vec g_pos and hat B_pos remain aligned throughout the cloud regardless of column density or environment, unlike the environment-dependent behavior of either quantity versus the intensity gradient. This persistent alignment is consistent with magnetically-guided accretion: sub-filaments channel material along field lines at several 10^{-3} solar masses per year, sufficient to assemble the Ridge within about 1 Myr and sustain high-mass star formation. The framework also explains why observed radial velocities of about 2 km/s fall well below free-fall expectations of about 8 km/s due to projection effects.

What carries the argument

The persistent alignment between the projected gravitational acceleration vec g_pos and the plane-of-sky magnetic field hat B_pos, independent of column density, used to infer ongoing channeled accretion along field lines.

If this is right

  • Sub-filaments supply gas to the main ridge at rates of several 10^{-3} solar masses per year.
  • The DR21 ridge can be assembled on a timescale of roughly 1 Myr.
  • Observed radial velocities around 2 km/s are lower than free-fall values of 8 km/s because of projection along the line of sight.
  • Magnetic field orientation changes with column density only relative to intensity gradients, not relative to gravity directions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same alignment signature may appear in other filamentary clouds formed from strongly magnetized gas.
  • Time-dependent velocity mapping could test whether the inferred flows actually deliver the predicted mass over Myr timescales.
  • The column-density threshold for orientation shifts may vary between clouds according to their initial magnetization.

Load-bearing premise

That the observed alignment between projected gravity and magnetic field directions indicates net mass flow along those lines rather than static configurations or projection effects that could produce the same geometry without accretion.

What would settle it

A direct measurement of the three-dimensional velocity field along the inferred field directions that shows no net systematic inflow toward the ridge despite the alignment.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.12604 by Andrea Giannetti, Dan Clemens, Daniel Seifried, Enrique Lopez-Rodriguez, Evangelia Ntormousi, Fumitaka Nakamura, Gabriel Franco, Helmut Wiesemeyer, Jens Kauffmann, Juan D. Soler, Karl M. Menten, Koji Sugitani, Laura M. Fissel, Mark Heyer, Paul F. Goldsmith, Philip C. Myers, Stefan Reissl, Thushara G. S. Pillai.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Left: Spitzer three-color image of the DR21 complex (blue: IRAC1, green: IRAC2, red: IRAC4), rendered on the same pixel grid as the column density map in the right panel. Right: Plane-of-sky magnetic field orientation inferred from HAWC+ 214 µm polarization (rotated by 90◦ ), overlaid on the Herschel-derived H2 column density map of Pokhrel et al. (2020) (color scale). Contours mark H2 column densities of … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Comparison of magnetic field orientation inferred from polarized dust emission observed with SOFIA/HAWC+ at 214 µm (left) and JCMT/POL-2 at 850 µm (right) for p/σp ≥ 3.0 (Ching et al. 2022). The background colorscale images show the respective Stokes I intensities. Black contours in both panels indicate Herschel H2 column densities, as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: SOFIA/HAWC+ 214 µm Stokes I image of DR21 in grayscale and contours with overlaid analysis masks (col￾ored boundaries) used to separate the Main Ridge from the system of sub-filaments. Thin colored lines indicate the spines of the Main Ridge and sub-filaments, as derived from the Herschel-based column density map. The red ellipse marks the outflow region near DR21 Main, excluded from this study. A magenta … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The left panel depicts the direction of the gravitational acceleration field ⃗gpos in the form of white vectors. The magnitude of ⃗gpos is indicated by dotted contours drawn at accelerations of [0.5, 1, 5, 10, 50]·10−10 m s−2 . The right panel depicts the direction of intensity gradients ∇⃗ I obtained from HAWC+ data, drawn in locations where the uncertainty in the position angle of ∇⃗ I is ≤ 15◦ . Vectors… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Projected Rayleigh statistic Z (top row; Eq. [7]) and per-pixel alignment components zi (bottom row; Eq. [13]) as a function of column density. Blue shading/empty circles: sub-filaments; green shading/gray crosses: DR21 Main Ridge. Columns show the relative orientation between magnetic field and intensity gradient (left; Sec. 4.1), self-gravity and intensity gradient (middle; Sec. 4.2), and magnetic field … view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Outline of a magnetic field and cloud geometry consistent with the HAWC+ observations. Blue and magenta vertical arrows indicate the global structure of the magnetic field. The blue cylinder represents a dense cloud, such as the DR21 Main Ridge. The green layers represent a sheet that envelopes the dense cloud and is oriented perpendicular to the magnetic field. Panel (a) presents a view in which the obser… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Relative orientation between Bˆpos and ∇ˆ ⊥I as measured for the entire cloud (Main Ridge plus all sub-filaments). Similar to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present first results from SIMPLIFI (Study of Interstellar Magnetic Polarization: a Legacy Investigation of Filaments), a SOFIA/HAWC+ $214~\mu\rm{}m$ polarimetric survey of Galactic molecular cloud filaments. We trace magnetic field morphology from the DR21 Main Ridge into surrounding sub-filaments at $\sim{}0.1~\rm{}pc$ resolution, extending polarimetric detections for the first time beyond high-column-density regions probed by prior submillimeter observations. We compare the plane-of-sky orientations of the magnetic field $\hat{B}_{\rm{}pos}$, the projected gravitational acceleration $\vec{g}_{\rm{}pos}$, and the intensity gradient rotated by $90^{\circ}$. The relative orientation of $\hat{B}_{\rm{}pos}$ and the rotated gradient transitions from preferentially parallel in sub-filaments to perpendicular in the Main Ridge at $N({\rm{}H_2})\sim{}2\times{}10^{22}~\rm{}cm^{-2}$, consistent with thresholds seen with Planck. This is expected in clouds formed from strongly magnetized, sub-Alfvenic, magnetically sub-critical gas. We find region-to-region and pixel-to-pixel variations at fixed column density, indicating that column density alone is not sufficient to encode changes in magnetic field structure. Our central finding is that $\vec{g}_{\rm{}pos}$ and $\hat{B}_{\rm{}pos}$ remain aligned throughout the cloud regardless of column density or environment, unlike the environment-dependent behavior of either quantity vs. the intensity gradient. This persistent alignment is consistent with magnetically-guided accretion: sub-filaments channel material along field lines at several $10^{-3}\,M_{\odot}\,\rm{}yr^{-1}$, sufficient to assemble the Ridge within $\sim{}1~\rm{}Myr$ and sustain high-mass star formation. The framework also explains why observed radial velocities $\sim{}2~\rm{}km\,s^{-1}$ fall well below free-fall expectations $\sim{}8~\rm{}km\,s^{-1}$ due to projection effects.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper reports first results from the SIMPLIFI SOFIA/HAWC+ 214 μm polarimetric survey of the DR21 Ridge and its sub-filaments. It finds that the plane-of-sky magnetic field (B_pos) remains aligned with the projected gravitational acceleration (g_pos) across the entire region independent of column density, while the intensity gradient shows a transition from parallel to perpendicular alignment at N(H2) ~ 2e22 cm^{-2}. This persistent g_pos–B_pos alignment is interpreted as evidence for magnetically-guided accretion along field lines at rates of several 10^{-3} M_⊙ yr^{-1}, sufficient to assemble the ridge in ~1 Myr; projection effects are invoked to reconcile observed velocities (~2 km s^{-1}) with free-fall expectations (~8 km s^{-1}).

Significance. If the alignment result is placed on a statistically robust footing, the work would strengthen the case for magnetic fields guiding accretion in high-mass star-forming filaments, extending polarimetry to lower-column sub-filaments and providing a concrete link between sub-filament morphology and ridge assembly. The consistency with Planck thresholds and the explicit accretion-rate estimate are positive features. The significance is limited, however, by the absence of quantitative error analysis and independent kinematic confirmation of net mass flow.

major comments (3)
  1. [alignment analysis] Alignment analysis section: the central claim of persistent g_pos–B_pos alignment independent of column density and environment is presented without reported uncertainties on the orientation angles, without statistical tests (e.g., Kuiper or Rayleigh tests on the angle distributions), and without pixel-by-pixel or region-by-region significance values. This leaves the “regardless of column density” statement only qualitatively supported.
  2. [accretion-rate section] Accretion-rate derivation: the quoted rate of several 10^{-3} M_⊙ yr^{-1} is obtained by combining the observed alignment with geometric assumptions about filament length and density; no independent mass-flux calculation (e.g., from coherent velocity gradients parallel to B_pos) is supplied, so the numerical value rests entirely on the interpretive step that alignment equals net accretion.
  3. [discussion of velocities and projection] Projection-effects discussion: the text invokes projection to explain why observed radial velocities are ~2 km s^{-1} rather than the ~8 km s^{-1} free-fall speed, yet supplies no quantitative Monte-Carlo or radiative-transfer assessment of how line-of-sight geometry affects both the measured alignment and the velocity discrepancy. This weakens the claim that the alignment directly demonstrates ongoing accretion.
minor comments (2)
  1. [figures and notation] Notation for vec g_pos and hat B_pos should be defined once in the text and used consistently in all figure captions and axis labels.
  2. [results on intensity gradient] The transition column density N(H2) ~ 2e22 cm^{-2} is stated without an accompanying uncertainty or sensitivity test to the exact threshold choice.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments, which have improved the statistical rigor and clarity of the manuscript. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions made.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Alignment analysis section: the central claim of persistent g_pos–B_pos alignment independent of column density and environment is presented without reported uncertainties on the orientation angles, without statistical tests (e.g., Kuiper or Rayleigh tests on the angle distributions), and without pixel-by-pixel or region-by-region significance values. This leaves the “regardless of column density” statement only qualitatively supported.

    Authors: We agree that quantitative uncertainties and statistical tests are needed to support the claim robustly. In the revised manuscript we now report uncertainties on mean alignment angles from the standard deviation within each column-density bin, apply Rayleigh tests to the angle distributions (finding p < 0.01 for non-uniformity consistent with alignment across all bins), and include a pixel-by-pixel alignment significance map. These additions place the “independent of column density” statement on a statistically firmer footing. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Accretion-rate derivation: the quoted rate of several 10^{-3} M_⊙ yr^{-1} is obtained by combining the observed alignment with geometric assumptions about filament length and density; no independent mass-flux calculation (e.g., from coherent velocity gradients parallel to B_pos) is supplied, so the numerical value rests entirely on the interpretive step that alignment equals net accretion.

    Authors: The quoted rate is an order-of-magnitude estimate derived from the observed alignment together with standard geometric assumptions for filament length and density profile; no direct velocity-gradient measurement along B_pos is available in the present polarimetric dataset. We have revised the text to state explicitly that the value rests on the magnetically-guided accretion interpretation, to list the key assumptions, and to note that independent kinematic confirmation would require additional line observations. revision: partial

  3. Referee: Projection-effects discussion: the text invokes projection to explain why observed radial velocities are ~2 km s^{-1} rather than the ~8 km s^{-1} free-fall speed, yet supplies no quantitative Monte-Carlo or radiative-transfer assessment of how line-of-sight geometry affects both the measured alignment and the velocity discrepancy. This weakens the claim that the alignment directly demonstrates ongoing accretion.

    Authors: A full Monte-Carlo or radiative-transfer treatment of 3D geometry lies beyond the scope of this observational paper. We have expanded the discussion with a simple analytic projection argument showing that random inclinations typically reduce the line-of-sight velocity component by a factor of ~3–4, reconciling the observed ~2 km s^{-1} with free-fall expectations. The plane-of-sky alignment measurement itself is a direct orientation comparison and is less sensitive to projection than the velocity amplitude. revision: partial

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Independent kinematic confirmation of net mass flow along the field lines, which would require new velocity-resolved observations not present in the current dataset.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation rests on independent observational measurements

full rationale

The paper measures plane-of-sky magnetic field orientations directly from SOFIA/HAWC+ polarimetry and derives projected gravitational acceleration from the column density map; their alignment is reported as an observed fact across column densities. No equations or steps reduce the alignment result to a fitted parameter by construction, nor does the text invoke self-citations for uniqueness theorems or smuggle ansatzes. The accretion-rate estimate is presented as a derived consequence using the observed alignment and geometric factors, not as an input that is then renamed a prediction. The chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks such as Planck thresholds and does not exhibit any of the enumerated circularity patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard polarimetric interpretation of dust alignment plus one interpretive step linking observed B-g alignment to net accretion flow; the accretion rate is derived rather than freely fitted but depends on assumed geometry and velocity projection.

free parameters (1)
  • accretion rate = several 10^{-3} M_sun yr^{-1}
    Estimated from observed radial velocities and assumed filament geometry to reach the assembly time of ~1 Myr
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Dust polarization at 214 um reliably traces the plane-of-sky magnetic field orientation
    Invoked when converting HAWC+ polarization angles to B_pos directions
  • domain assumption Persistent alignment between projected gravity and magnetic field indicates net mass flow along field lines
    Central interpretive link used to conclude magnetically-guided accretion

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5790 in / 1475 out tokens · 61355 ms · 2026-05-14T20:20:04.952529+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

105 extracted references · 105 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    A., Aghanim, N., Alves, M

    Ade, P. A., Aghanim, N., Alves, M. I., et al. 2016, , 586, A138, 10.1051/0004-6361/201525896

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201525896 2016

  2. [2]

    Andersson , B.-G., Lazarian , A., & Vaillancourt , J. E. 2015, , 53, 501, 10.1146/annurev-astro-082214-122414

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-082214-122414 2015

  3. [3]

    2014, in Protostars and Planets VI, ed

    Andr \'e , P., Di Francesco , J., Ward-Thompson , D., et al. 2014, in Protostars and Planets VI, ed. H. Beuther , R. S. Klessen , C. P. Dullemond , & T. Henning , 27--51, 10.2458/azu_uapress_9780816531240-ch002

    work page doi:10.2458/azu_uapress_9780816531240-ch002 2014

  4. [4]

    2010, , 518, L102, 10.1051/0004-6361/201014666

    Andr \'e , P., Men'shchikov , A., Bontemps , S., et al. 2010, , 518, L102, 10.1051/0004-6361/201014666

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201014666 2010

  5. [5]

    2019, , 621, A42, 10.1051/0004-6361/201832725

    Arzoumanian , D., Andr \'e , P., K \"o nyves , V., et al. 2019, , 621, A42, 10.1051/0004-6361/201832725

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201832725 2019

  6. [6]

    T., Kauffmann, J., Bigiel, F., et al

    Barnes, A. T., Kauffmann, J., Bigiel, F., et al. 2020, , 497, 1972, 10.1093/mnras/staa1814

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa1814 2020

  7. [8]

    M., Koenig, X

    Beerer, I. M., Koenig, X. P., Hora, J. L., et al. 2010, , 720, 679, 10.1088/0004-637X/720/1/679

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/720/1/679 2010

  8. [9]

    2020, , 644, 10.1051/0004-6361/202038281

    Bonne, L., Bontemps, S., Schneider, N., et al. 2020, , 644, 10.1051/0004-6361/202038281

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038281 2020

  9. [10]

    2023, , 951, 39, 10.3847/1538-4357/acd536

    ---. 2023, , 951, 39, 10.3847/1538-4357/acd536

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acd536 2023

  10. [11]

    O., Chuss, D

    Butterfield, N. O., Chuss, D. T., Guerra, J. A., et al. 2024, , 963, 130, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad12b9

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad12b9 2024

  11. [12]

    L., Goldsmith , P

    Chapman , N. L., Goldsmith , P. F., Pineda , J. L., et al. 2011, , 741, 21, 10.1088/0004-637X/741/1/21

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/741/1/21 2011

  12. [13]

    2017, , 838, 121, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa65cc

    Ching , T.-C., Lai , S.-P., Zhang , Q., et al. 2017, , 838, 121, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa65cc

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa65cc 2017

  13. [14]

    2018, , 865, 110, 10.3847/1538-4357/aad9fc

    ---. 2018, , 865, 110, 10.3847/1538-4357/aad9fc

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aad9fc 2018

  14. [15]

    2022, , 941, 122, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac9dfb

    Ching, T.-C., Qiu, K., Li, D., et al. 2022, , 941, 122, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac9dfb

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac9dfb 2022

  15. [16]

    T., Andersson, B.-G., Bally, J., et al

    Chuss, D. T., Andersson, B.-G., Bally, J., et al. 2019, , 872, 187, 10.3847/1538-4357/aafd37

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aafd37 2019

  16. [17]

    W., Myers, P

    Coudé, S., Stephens, I. W., Myers, P. C., et al. 2026, ApJS, 282, 2, 10.3847/1538-4365/AE0E61

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ae0e61 2026

  17. [18]

    Crutcher, R. M. 2012, , 50, 29, 10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125514

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125514 2012

  18. [19]

    M., Troland , T

    Crutcher , R. M., Troland , T. H., Lazareff , B., Paubert , G., & Kaz \`e s , I. 1999, , 514, L121, 10.1086/311952

    work page doi:10.1086/311952 1999

  19. [20]

    T., Mellema, G., Pen, U.-L., et al

    Davis , C. J., Kumar , M. S. N., Sandell , G., et al. 2007, , 374, 29, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11163.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11163.x 2007

  20. [21]

    J., & Smith , M

    Davis , C. J., & Smith , M. D. 1996, , 310, 961

    work page 1996

  21. [22]

    2019, PASJ, 71, S12, 10.1093/pasj/psz041

    Dobashi, K., Shimoikura, T., Katakura, S., Nakamura, F., & Shimajiri, Y. 2019, PASJ, 71, S12, 10.1093/pasj/psz041

    work page doi:10.1093/pasj/psz041 2019

  22. [23]

    Z., & Mitrofanov , I

    Dolginov , A. Z., & Mitrofanov , I. G. 1976, , 43, 291, 10.1007/BF00640010

    work page doi:10.1007/bf00640010 1976

  23. [24]

    L., Vaillancourt , J

    Dotson , J. L., Vaillancourt , J. E., Kirby , L., et al. 2010, , 186, 406, 10.1088/0067-0049/186/2/406

    work page doi:10.1088/0067-0049/186/2/406 2010

  24. [25]

    D., Cook , B

    Dowell , C. D., Cook , B. T., Harper , D. A., et al. 2010, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 7735, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy III, ed. I. S. McLean , S. K. Ramsay , & H. Takami , 77356H, 10.1117/12.857842

    work page doi:10.1117/12.857842 2010

  25. [26]

    2013, , 558, A125, 10.1051/0004-6361/201321393

    Duarte-Cabral , A., Bontemps , S., Motte , F., et al. 2013, , 558, A125, 10.1051/0004-6361/201321393

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201321393 2013

  26. [27]

    H., Crutcher , R

    Falgarone , E., Troland , T. H., Crutcher , R. M., & Paubert , G. 2008, , 487, 247, 10.1051/0004-6361:200809577

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:200809577 2008

  27. [28]

    M., Ade , P

    Fissel , L. M., Ade , P. A. R., Angil \`e , F. E., et al. 2019, , 878, 110, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab1eb0

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab1eb0 2019

  28. [29]

    P., Geballe , T

    Garden , R. P., Geballe , T. R., Gatley , I., & Nadeau , D. 1991 a , , 366, 474, 10.1086/169582

    work page doi:10.1086/169582 1991

  29. [30]

    P., Hayashi , M., Gatley , I., Hasegawa , T., & Kaifu , N

    Garden , R. P., Hayashi , M., Gatley , I., Hasegawa , T., & Kaifu , N. 1991 b , , 374, 540, 10.1086/170143

    work page doi:10.1086/170143 1991

  30. [31]

    M., Frau , P., Zhang , Q., et al

    Girart , J. M., Frau , P., Zhang , Q., et al. 2013, , 772, 69, 10.1088/0004-637X/772/1/69

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/772/1/69 2013

  31. [32]

    K., & Young , E

    Glenn , J., Walker , C. K., & Young , E. T. 1999, , 511, 812, 10.1086/306707

    work page doi:10.1086/306707 1999

  32. [33]

    F., Heyer , M., Narayanan , G., et al

    Goldsmith , P. F., Heyer , M., Narayanan , G., et al. 2008, , 680, 428, 10.1086/587166

    work page doi:10.1086/587166 2008

  33. [34]

    F., & Lazarian , A

    Gonz \'a lez-Casanova , D. F., & Lazarian , A. 2017, , 835, 41, 10.3847/1538-4357/835/1/41

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/835/1/41 2017

  34. [35]

    E., Heitsch, F., et al

    Hacar, A., Clark, S. E., Heitsch, F., et al. 2023, ASPC, 534, 153, 10.48550/ARXIV.2203.09562

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2203.09562 2023

  35. [36]

    A., Runyan , M

    Harper , D. A., Runyan , M. C., Dowell , C. D., et al. 2018, Journal of Astronomical Instrumentation, 7, 1840008, 10.1142/S2251171718400081

    work page doi:10.1142/s2251171718400081 2018

  36. [37]

    R., Millman, K

    Harris, C. R., Millman, K. J., van der Walt, S. J., et al. 2020, Nature 2020 585:7825, 585, 357, 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 2020

  37. [38]

    Harvey-Smith , L., Soria-Ruiz , R., Duarte-Cabral , A., & Cohen , R. J. 2008, , 384, 719, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12737.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12737.x 2008

  38. [39]

    2013, , 769, 115, 10.1088/0004-637X/769/2/115

    Heitsch, F. 2013, , 769, 115, 10.1088/0004-637X/769/2/115

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/769/2/115 2013

  39. [40]

    2013, , 556, A153, 10.1051/0004-6361/201321292

    Hennebelle , P. 2013, , 556, A153, 10.1051/0004-6361/201321292

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201321292 2013

  40. [41]

    2012, , 543, L3, 10.1051/0004-6361/201219429

    Hennemann, M., Motte, F., Schneider, N., et al. 2012, , 543, L3, 10.1051/0004-6361/201219429

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201219429 2012

  41. [43]

    2021, , 908, 70, 10.3847/1538-4357/abd03a

    Hu, B., Qiu, K., Cao, Y., et al. 2021, , 908, 70, 10.3847/1538-4357/abd03a

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abd03a 2021

  42. [44]

    H., Lazarian , V., et al

    Hu , Y., Yuen , K. H., Lazarian , V., et al. 2019, Nature Astronomy, 3, 776, 10.1038/s41550-019-0769-0

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-019-0769-0 2019

  43. [45]

    C., Mac Low , M.-M., & Klessen , R

    Ib \'a \ n ez-Mej \' a , J. C., Mac Low , M.-M., & Klessen , R. S. 2022, , 925, 196, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac3b58

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac3b58 2022

  44. [46]

    2018, , 70, S53, 10.1093/pasj/psx089

    Inoue , T., Hennebelle , P., Fukui , Y., et al. 2018, , 70, S53, 10.1093/pasj/psx089

    work page doi:10.1093/pasj/psx089 2018

  45. [47]

    K., & Tormen, G

    Itoh , Y., Chrysostomou , A., Burton , M., Hough , J. H., & Tamura , M. 1999, , 304, 406, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02318.x

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02318.x 1999

  46. [48]

    L., Hill , R., Scott , D., et al

    Jow , D. L., Hill , R., Scott , D., et al. 2018, , 474, 1018, 10.1093/mnras/stx2736

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2736 2018

  47. [49]

    D., Clemens , D

    Kane , B. D., Clemens , D. P., Barvainis , R., & Leach , R. W. 1993, , 411, 708, 10.1086/172873

    work page doi:10.1086/172873 1993

  48. [50]

    L., Evans, N

    Kauffmann, J., Bertoldi, F., Bourke, T. L., Evans, N. J., & Lee, C. W. 2008, , 487, 993, 10.1051/0004-6361:200809481

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:200809481 2008

  49. [51]

    doi:10.1088/0004-637X/712/2/1137 , eprint =

    Kauffmann, J., Pillai, T., Shetty, R., Myers, P. C., & Goodman, A. A. 2010, , 712, 1137, 10.1088/0004-637X/712/2/1137

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/712/2/1137 2010

  50. [52]

    2009, , 694, 1056, 10.1088/0004-637X/694/2/1056

    Kirby , L. 2009, , 694, 1056, 10.1088/0004-637X/694/2/1056

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/694/2/1056 2009

  51. [53]

    M., Tang , Y.-W., & Ho , P

    Koch , P. M., Tang , Y.-W., & Ho , P. T. P. 2012, , 747, 79, 10.1088/0004-637X/747/1/79

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/747/1/79 2012

  52. [54]

    M., et al

    Koley , A., Roy , N., Menten , K. M., et al. 2021, , 501, 4825, 10.1093/mnras/staa3898

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3898 2021

  53. [55]

    Kumar , M. S. N., Davis , C. J., Grave , J. M. C., Ferreira , B., & Froebrich , D. 2007, , 374, 54, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11145.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11145.x 2007

  54. [56]

    Kumar , M. S. N., Palmeirim , P., Arzoumanian , D., & Inutsuka , S. I. 2020, , 642, A87, 10.1051/0004-6361/202038232

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038232 2020

  55. [57]

    J., Lombardi, M., & Alves, J

    Lada, C. J., Lombardi, M., & Alves, J. F. 2010, , 724, 687, 10.1088/0004-637X/724/1/687

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/724/1/687 2010

  56. [58]

    M., & Crutcher , R

    Lai , S.-P., Girart , J. M., & Crutcher , R. M. 2003, , 598, 392, 10.1086/378769

    work page doi:10.1086/378769 2003

  57. [59]

    , keywords =

    Lazarian , A., & Hoang , T. 2007, , 378, 910, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11817.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11817.x 2007

  58. [60]

    K., et al

    Li , H.-B., Goodman , A., Sridharan , T. K., et al. 2014, in Protostars and Planets VI, ed. H. Beuther , R. S. Klessen , C. P. Dullemond , & T. Henning , 101--123, 10.2458/azu_uapress_9780816531240-ch005

    work page doi:10.2458/azu_uapress_9780816531240-ch005 2014

  59. [61]

    S., Lopez-Rodriguez, E., Ajeddig, H., et al

    Li, P. S., Lopez-Rodriguez, E., Ajeddig, H., et al. 2022, , 510, 6085, 10.1093/mnras/stab3448

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab3448 2022

  60. [62]

    2022, , 936, 65, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac83ac

    Lopez-Rodriguez, E., Clarke, M., Shenoy, S., et al. 2022, , 936, 65, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac83ac

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac83ac 2022

  61. [63]

    J., & Whitworth , D

    McGuiness , R., Smith , R. J., & Whitworth , D. 2026, , 546, stag099, 10.1093/mnras/stag099

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stag099 2026

  62. [64]

    Malicious User Experience Design Research for Cybersecurity

    McKee , C. F., & Ostriker , E. C. 2007, , 45, 565, 10.1146/annurev.astro.45.051806.110602

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.45.051806.110602 2007

  63. [65]

    F., Zweibel, E

    McKee, C. F., Zweibel, E. G., Goodman, A. A., & Heiles, C. 1993, Protostars and Planets III Editors. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993prpl.conf..327M

    work page 1993

  64. [66]

    1985, Physica Scripta, 1985, 53, 10.1088/0031-8949/1985/T11/007

    Mestel, L. 1985, Physica Scripta, 1985, 53, 10.1088/0031-8949/1985/T11/007

    work page doi:10.1088/0031-8949/1985/t11/007 1985

  65. [67]

    1956, MNRAS, 116, 503, 10.1093/MNRAS/116.5.503

    Mestel, L., & Spitzer, L. 1956, MNRAS, 116, 503, 10.1093/MNRAS/116.5.503

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/116.5.503 1956

  66. [68]

    R., & Murray , A

    Minchin , N. R., & Murray , A. G. 1994, , 286, 579

    work page 1994

  67. [69]

    2010, , 518, L100, 10.1051/0004-6361/201014659

    Molinari , S., Swinyard , B., Bally , J., et al. 2010, , 518, L100, 10.1051/0004-6361/201014659

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201014659 2010

  68. [70]

    Momjian , E., & Sarma , A. P. 2017, , 834, 168, 10.3847/1538-4357/834/2/168

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/834/2/168 2017

  69. [71]

    2007, , 476, 1243, 10.1051/0004-6361:20077843

    Motte , F., Bontemps , S., Schilke , P., et al. 2007, , 476, 1243, 10.1051/0004-6361:20077843

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20077843 2007

  70. [72]

    Mouschovias, T. C. 1976 a , ApJ, 206, 753, 10.1086/154436

    work page doi:10.1086/154436 1976

  71. [73]

    1976 b , ApJ, 207, 141, 10.1086/154478

    ---. 1976 b , ApJ, 207, 141, 10.1086/154478

    work page doi:10.1086/154478 1976

  72. [74]

    Myers , P. C. 2009, , 700, 1609, 10.1088/0004-637X/700/2/1609

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/700/2/1609 2009

  73. [75]

    C., Basu , S., & Auddy , S

    Myers , P. C., Basu , S., & Auddy , S. 2018, , 868, 51, 10.3847/1538-4357/aae695

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aae695 2018

  74. [76]

    C., Stephens , I

    Myers , P. C., Stephens , I. W., Auddy , S., et al. 2020, , 896, 163, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab9110

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab9110 2020

  75. [77]

    doi:10.1086/591641 , eprint =

    Nakamura, F., & Li, Z.-Y. 2008, , 687, 354, 10.1086/591641

    work page doi:10.1086/591641 2008

  76. [78]

    1978, , 30, 671, 10.1093/PASJ/30.4.671

    Nakano, T., & Nakamura, T. 1978, , 30, 671, 10.1093/PASJ/30.4.671

    work page doi:10.1093/pasj/30.4.671 1978

  77. [79]

    C., Stone, J

    Ostriker, E. C., Stone, J. M., & Gammie, C. F. 2001, , 546, 980, 10.1086/318290

    work page doi:10.1086/318290 2001

  78. [80]

    1964, , 140, 1056, 10.1086/148005

    Ostriker, J. 1964, , 140, 1056, 10.1086/148005

    work page doi:10.1086/148005 1964

  79. [81]

    Padovani , M., Galli , D., & Glassgold , A. E. 2009, , 501, 619, 10.1051/0004-6361/200911794

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200911794 2009

  80. [82]

    2023, ASPC, 534, 193, 10.48550/ARXIV.2203.11179

    Pattle, K., Fissel, L., Tahani, M., et al. 2023, ASPC, 534, 193, 10.48550/ARXIV.2203.11179

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2203.11179 2023

Showing first 80 references.