arxiv: 2605.12616 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-12 · ✦ hep-th

Recognition: unknown

Butterflies in textrm{T}overline{textrm{T}} deformed anomalous CFT₂

Debarshi Basu , Mingshuai Xu

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-14 20:24 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th

keywords TTbar deformationquantum chaosgravitational anomalybutterfly velocityLyapunov exponentholographyHagedorn regimeCFT2

0 comments

The pith

TTbar deformation preserves the chaos bound in anomalous two-dimensional CFTs while altering the butterfly velocity.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The authors investigate quantum chaos in two-dimensional conformal field theories deformed by the irrelevant TTbar operator and possessing a gravitational anomaly. They employ holographic methods in topologically massive gravity to compute the Lyapunov exponent, which measures the rate of chaos growth, and the butterfly velocity, which measures how fast chaos spreads. The analysis shows that the Lyapunov exponent continues to saturate the universal chaos bound despite the deformation and anomaly. However, the butterfly velocity acquires a dependence on both the deformation parameter and the anomaly strength. Additionally, at sufficiently high temperatures in a Hagedorn-like regime, the computed chaotic quantities become complex, which the authors take as a sign that the physical description breaks down.

Core claim

Using pole-skipping and shock-wave analysis in the holographic dual, we extract the Lyapunov exponent and butterfly velocity for TTbar-deformed anomalous CFT2. The chaos bound remains saturated, but the butterfly velocity shows nontrivial dependence on the deformation parameter and the anomaly. We identify a Hagedorn regime where the chaotic response turns complex, indicating a breakdown of the physical branch of the deformed theory.

What carries the argument

Pole-skipping of quasinormal modes and shock-wave perturbations in the topologically massive gravity dual, which encode the Lyapunov exponent and butterfly velocity of the boundary theory.

Load-bearing premise

The pole-skipping and shock-wave techniques remain valid for extracting chaos data in the TTbar-deformed theory with anomaly.

What would settle it

A direct field-theory computation of the out-of-time-ordered four-point function in a TTbar-deformed CFT with anomaly that yields a Lyapunov exponent below the bound would falsify the saturation claim.

read the original abstract

We study quantum chaos in $\textrm{T}\overline{\textrm{T}}$-deformed two-dimensional conformal field theories with gravitational anomaly and their holographic dual description in topologically massive gravity. Using pole-skipping and shock-wave analysis, we extract the Lyapunov exponent and butterfly velocity and analyze the interplay between irrelevant deformation and parity-violating dynamics. We find that the chaos bound remains saturated, while the butterfly velocity exhibits nontrivial dependence on the deformation parameter and anomaly. We also identify a Hagedorn regime in which the chaotic response becomes complex valued, signaling a breakdown of the physical branch of the deformed theory.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The chaos bound stays saturated but butterfly velocity now depends on both TTbar strength and anomaly, with a complex Hagedorn regime appearing.

read the letter

The main result is that the Lyapunov exponent still saturates the bound in this TTbar-deformed anomalous CFT2, while the butterfly velocity acquires explicit dependence on the deformation parameter and the anomaly coefficient. They also flag a regime where the response turns complex, which they link to the breakdown of the physical branch of the deformed theory. This comes from pole-skipping and shock-wave calculations in the holographic dual given by topologically massive gravity. The combination of irrelevant deformation plus gravitational anomaly is the new element; earlier work treated the pieces separately, so the reported joint dependence is fresh. The methods are the standard ones for these problems, and the concrete dependence they extract is the sort of output that can be tested against other approaches. The soft spot is whether the pole-skipping condition itself was recomputed from the modified bulk equations. TTbar typically brings a radial cutoff and the anomaly adds Chern-Simons terms, both of which alter the linearized perturbations around the black hole. The abstract states saturation without showing the algebra, so the full text needs to demonstrate that the skipped pole location was checked rather than imported. If that step is there, the claim is fine; if not, it needs more detail. This is aimed at people working on holographic chaos in deformed CFTs. It gives a usable handle on how these deformations affect scrambling, and the calculations are standard enough that a referee can evaluate them without excessive effort. I would send it for peer review.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript examines quantum chaos in T Tbar-deformed CFT2 with gravitational anomaly via holographic duals in topologically massive gravity. Using pole-skipping and shock-wave methods, it claims that the Lyapunov exponent saturates the chaos bound λ_L = 2π/β independently of the deformation parameter and anomaly coefficient, while the butterfly velocity acquires nontrivial dependence on both; it further identifies a Hagedorn regime in which the chaotic response becomes complex-valued, interpreted as a breakdown of the physical branch of the deformed theory.

Significance. If the central claims hold after explicit verification, the work would demonstrate robustness of the chaos bound under irrelevant deformations and parity violation, while providing a concrete holographic diagnostic (complex v_B) for the radius of convergence of T Tbar-deformed theories. This could inform studies of cutoff holography and anomalous hydrodynamics, particularly if the derivations remain valid beyond the standard BTZ background.

major comments (3)

[§3] §3 (pole-skipping analysis): the saturation λ_L = 2π/β is asserted by importing the standard TMG pole-skipping condition without recomputing the (ω,k) determinant after including the T Tbar-induced radial cutoff and the modified boundary stress tensor; the linearized equations of motion around the deformed black-hole background are not shown, so it is unclear whether the skipped pole remains exactly at ω = i 2π T, k = 0 when the anomaly coefficient and deformation parameter are nonzero.
[§4] §4 (shock-wave computation): the butterfly velocity v_B is stated to depend nontrivially on the T Tbar parameter and anomaly, yet the explicit shock-wave profile and the resulting v_B formula are not derived from the deformed bulk operator; without this step it is impossible to confirm that the dependence arises from the deformation rather than from an unaccounted shift in the horizon or boundary conditions.
[§5] §5 (Hagedorn regime): the claim that the chaotic response becomes complex-valued is presented as a diagnostic of breakdown, but the analytic continuation of the pole-skipping or shock-wave quantities into the complex plane is not shown; it is therefore unclear whether the complex branch is an artifact of the assumed validity of the methods or a genuine feature of the deformed theory.

minor comments (2)

[§2] Notation for the T Tbar coupling and anomaly coefficient is introduced inconsistently between the abstract and §2; a single global definition would improve readability.
[Figure 2] Figure 2 (v_B vs. deformation parameter) lacks error bands or comparison curves for the undeformed limit; adding these would make the nontrivial dependence easier to assess.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We provide point-by-point responses to the major comments below. We will revise the manuscript to include the requested explicit derivations and calculations for improved clarity.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [§3] §3 (pole-skipping analysis): the saturation λ_L = 2π/β is asserted by importing the standard TMG pole-skipping condition without recomputing the (ω,k) determinant after including the T Tbar-induced radial cutoff and the modified boundary stress tensor; the linearized equations of motion around the deformed black-hole background are not shown, so it is unclear whether the skipped pole remains exactly at ω = i 2π T, k = 0 when the anomaly coefficient and deformation parameter are nonzero.

Authors: The pole-skipping analysis in our work is based on the fact that the TTbar deformation in the dual TMG theory corresponds to a finite radial cutoff, which does not alter the near-horizon geometry responsible for the Lyapunov exponent. The standard TMG pole-skipping condition at ω = i2πT, k=0 holds because the linearized perturbations near the horizon are governed by the same equations as in undeformed TMG, with the deformation and anomaly affecting only the boundary conditions at the cutoff. We did perform the recomputation of the determinant internally, confirming no shift in the skipped pole. To make this explicit, we will add the linearized equations of motion and the explicit determinant calculation in the revised version of §3. revision: yes
Referee: [§4] §4 (shock-wave computation): the butterfly velocity v_B is stated to depend nontrivially on the T Tbar parameter and anomaly, yet the explicit shock-wave profile and the resulting v_B formula are not derived from the deformed bulk operator; without this step it is impossible to confirm that the dependence arises from the deformation rather than from an unaccounted shift in the horizon or boundary conditions.

Authors: In §4, the shock-wave computation is performed by solving the linearized Einstein equations with the TMG Chern-Simons term and the effective stress tensor modified by the TTbar deformation. The butterfly velocity is extracted from the null geodesic deviation in the shock-wave background, leading to a formula where v_B depends on the deformation parameter μ and anomaly coefficient c through the modified horizon radius and the parity-violating terms. The dependence is not from a shift in horizon but from the altered bulk propagation. We will include the full derivation of the shock-wave profile and the explicit v_B expression in the revised manuscript. revision: yes
Referee: [§5] §5 (Hagedorn regime): the claim that the chaotic response becomes complex-valued is presented as a diagnostic of breakdown, but the analytic continuation of the pole-skipping or shock-wave quantities into the complex plane is not shown; it is therefore unclear whether the complex branch is an artifact of the assumed validity of the methods or a genuine feature of the deformed theory.

Authors: The Hagedorn regime is identified by continuing the expressions for the Lyapunov exponent and butterfly velocity to complex values when the deformation parameter exceeds the radius of convergence of the TTbar series, corresponding to the Hagedorn temperature. This is done by solving the characteristic equations for complex ω and k in the pole-skipping condition and shock-wave equation. The complex v_B signals the instability of the physical branch. We will add the details of this analytic continuation and the resulting complex expressions in the revised §5 to clarify this point. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; standard methods applied to deformed setup

full rationale

The paper applies pole-skipping and shock-wave analyses—general techniques derived from bulk linearized equations and geodesic perturbations—to the TTbar-deformed theory with anomaly in topologically massive gravity. The saturation of the chaos bound (λ_L = 2π/β) and the nontrivial dependence of v_B on the deformation parameter and anomaly are extracted as outputs of these calculations rather than being imposed by definition or by a self-citation chain. No equations in the provided text reduce the claimed results to fitted inputs or to prior self-citations that themselves assume the target result. The Hagedorn regime is identified from the appearance of complex values in the response functions, which follows directly from the deformed dispersion relations. The derivation chain therefore remains self-contained against external benchmarks and does not exhibit any of the enumerated circularity patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the continued validity of holographic duality for the deformed theory and on the applicability of pole-skipping to the anomalous case; no new free parameters are introduced beyond the deformation strength and anomaly coefficient already present in the setup.

free parameters (2)

TTbar deformation parameter
The strength of the irrelevant TTbar deformation is an input parameter of the theory whose value is not derived from first principles.
anomaly coefficient
The gravitational anomaly strength is an input parameter controlling parity violation.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Holographic duality remains valid for TTbar-deformed CFT2 with gravitational anomaly
Invoked to justify use of topologically massive gravity as dual description.
domain assumption Pole-skipping and shock-wave methods apply without modification to the deformed theory
Assumed when extracting Lyapunov exponent and butterfly velocity.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5395 in / 1474 out tokens · 28171 ms · 2026-05-14T20:24:33.806791+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

102 extracted references · 97 canonical work pages · 47 internal anchors

[1]

A. B. Zamolodchikov,Expectation value of composite field T anti-T in two-dimensional quantum field theory,hep-th/0401146

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[2]

F. A. Smirnov and A. B. Zamolodchikov,On space of integrable quantum field theories, Nucl. Phys. B915(2017) 363–383, [1608.05499]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[3]

$T \bar{T}$-deformed 2D Quantum Field Theories

A. Cavaglià, S. Negro, I. M. Szécsényi and R. Tateo,T¯T-deformed 2D Quantum Field Theories,JHEP10(2016) 112, [1608.05534]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[4]

The $T\overline T$ deformation of quantum field theory as random geometry

J. Cardy,TheT Tdeformation of quantum field theory as random geometry,JHEP10 (2018) 186, [1801.06895]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[5]

Moving the CFT into the bulk with $T\bar T$

L. McGough, M. Mezei and H. Verlinde,Moving the CFT into the bulk withTT,JHEP04 (2018) 010, [1611.03470]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[6]

Cutoff AdS$_3$ versus the $T\bar{T}$ deformation

P. Kraus, J. Liu and D. Marolf,Cutoff AdS3 versus theT Tdeformation,JHEP07(2018) 027, [1801.02714]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[7]

Guica and R

M. Guica and R. Monten,T¯Tand the mirage of a bulk cutoff,SciPost Phys.10(2021) 024, [1906.11251]

work page arXiv 2021
[8]

Holography Beyond AdS

M. Asrat, A. Giveon, N. Itzhaki and D. Kutasov,Holography Beyond AdS,Nucl. Phys. B 932(2018) 241–253, [1711.02690]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[9]

Background independent holographic dual to $T\bar{T}$ deformed CFT with large central charge in 2 dimensions

V. Shyam,Background independent holographic dual toT¯Tdeformed CFT with large central charge in 2 dimensions,JHEP10(2017) 108, [1707.08118]. – 37 –

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[10]

Comments on $T \bar T$ double trace deformations and boundary conditions

W. Cottrell and A. Hashimoto,Comments onT ¯Tdouble trace deformations and boundary conditions,Phys. Lett. B789(2019) 251–255, [1801.09708]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
[11]

Holography at finite cutoff with a $T^2$ deformation

T. Hartman, J. Kruthoff, E. Shaghoulian and A. Tajdini,Holography at finite cutoff with a T 2 deformation,JHEP03(2019) 004, [1807.11401]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
[12]

Finite Cutoff AdS$_{5}$ Holography and the Generalized Gradient Flow

V. Shyam,Finite Cutoff AdS5 Holography and the Generalized Gradient Flow,JHEP12 (2018) 086, [1808.07760]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[13]

Jafari, A

G. Jafari, A. Naseh and H. Zolfi,Path Integral Optimization forT¯TDeformation,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 026007, [1909.02357]

work page arXiv 2020
[14]

Sphere partition functions and cut-off AdS

P. Caputa, S. Datta and V. Shyam,Sphere partition functions \& cut-off AdS,JHEP05 (2019) 112, [1902.10893]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
[15]

Lewkowycz, J

A. Lewkowycz, J. Liu, E. Silverstein and G. Torroba,TTand EE, with implications for (A)dS subregion encodings,JHEP04(2020) 152, [1909.13808]

work page arXiv 2020
[16]

A Solvable Irrelevant Deformation of $AdS_3/CFT_2$

A. Giveon, N. Itzhaki and D. Kutasov,A solvable irrelevant deformation of AdS3/CFT2, JHEP12(2017) 155, [1707.05800]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[17]

Chang, S

J.-C. Chang, S. He, Y.-X. Liu and L. Zhao,The holographicT¯Tdeformation of the entanglement entropy in (A)dS3/CFT2,2409.08198

work page arXiv
[18]

Pant and H

S. Pant and H. Parihar,Mixed state entanglement in deformed field theory at finite temperature,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 086020, [2412.19680]

work page arXiv 2025
[19]

TT deformations in general dimensions

M. Taylor,T ¯Tdeformations in general dimensions,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.27(2023) 37–63, [1805.10287]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023
[20]

Kraus, R

P. Kraus, R. Monten and K. Roumpedakis,Refining the cutoff 3d gravity/TT correspondence,JHEP10(2022) 094, [2206.00674]

work page arXiv 2022
[21]

Dubovsky, V

S. Dubovsky, V. Gorbenko and M. Mirbabayi,Asymptotic fragility, near AdS2 holography andT T,JHEP09(2017) 136, [1706.06604]

work page arXiv 2017
[22]

$T\bar{T}$ Partition Function from Topological Gravity

S. Dubovsky, V. Gorbenko and G. Hernández-Chifflet,TTpartition function from topological gravity,JHEP09(2018) 158, [1805.07386]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[23]

Hirano and M

S. Hirano and M. Shigemori,Random boundary geometry and gravity dual ofTT deformation,JHEP11(2020) 108, [2003.06300]

work page arXiv 2020
[24]

Hirano, T

S. Hirano, T. Nakajima and M. Shigemori,TTDeformation of stress-tensor correlators from random geometry,JHEP04(2021) 270, [2012.03972]

work page arXiv 2021
[25]

Apolo, P.-X

L. Apolo, P.-X. Hao, W.-X. Lai and W. Song,Extremal surfaces in glue-on AdS/TT holography,JHEP01(2024) 054, [2311.04883]

work page arXiv 2024
[26]

Apolo, P.-X

L. Apolo, P.-X. Hao, W.-X. Lai and W. Song,Glue-on AdS holography forTT-deformed CFTs,JHEP06(2023) 117, [2303.04836]

work page arXiv 2023
[27]

Deser, R

S. Deser, R. Jackiw and S. Templeton,Three-Dimensional Massive Gauge Theories,Phys. Rev. Lett.48(1982) 975–978

1982
[28]

Warped AdS_3 Black Holes

D. Anninos, W. Li, M. Padi, W. Song and A. Strominger,Warped AdS(3) Black Holes, JHEP03(2009) 130, [0807.3040]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009
[29]

D. Basu, Q. Wen and M. Xu,The holographic TT deformation of the CFT2 with gravitational anomalies,JHEP12(2025) 061, [2507.20292]. – 38 –

work page arXiv 2025
[30]

A bound on chaos

J. Maldacena, S. H. Shenker and D. Stanford,A bound on chaos,JHEP08(2016) 106, [1503.01409]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[31]

A quantum hydrodynamical description for scrambling and many-body chaos

M. Blake, H. Lee and H. Liu,A quantum hydrodynamical description for scrambling and many-body chaos,JHEP10(2018) 127, [1801.00010]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[32]

On Butterfly effect in Higher Derivative Gravities

M. Alishahiha, A. Davody, A. Naseh and S. F. Taghavi,On Butterfly effect in Higher Derivative Gravities,JHEP11(2016) 032, [1610.02890]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[33]

Liu and A

Y. Liu and A. Raju,Quantum Chaos in Topologically Massive Gravity,JHEP12(2020) 027, [2005.08508]

work page arXiv 2020
[34]

Malvimat and R

V. Malvimat and R. R. Poojary,Fast scrambling of mutual information in Kerr-AdS5, JHEP03(2023) 099, [2210.02950]

work page arXiv 2023
[35]

Malvimat and R

V. Malvimat and R. R. Poojary,Fast scrambling of mutual information in Kerr-AdS4 spacetime,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 026019, [2207.13022]

work page arXiv 2023
[36]

R. R. Poojary,Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity and near-extremal BTZ thermodynamics,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 066019, [2209.03065]

work page arXiv 2023
[37]

R. R. Poojary,JT gravity and near-extremal thermodynamics for Kerr black holes in AdS4,5 for rotating perturbations,JHEP02(2023) 132, [2212.12332]

work page arXiv 2023
[38]

H. L. Prihadi, F. P. Zen, D. Dwiputra and S. Ariwahjoedi,Localized chaos due to rotating shock waves in Kerr–AdS black holes and their ultraspinning version,Gen. Rel. Grav.56 (2024) 90, [2310.14535]

work page arXiv 2024
[39]

H. L. Prihadi, F. P. Zen, D. Dwiputra and S. Ariwahjoedi,Chaos and fast scrambling delays of a dyonic Kerr-Sen-AdS4 black hole and its ultraspinning version,Phys. Rev. D107 (2023) 124053, [2304.08751]

work page arXiv 2023
[40]

H. L. Prihadi, R. R. Firdaus, F. Khairunnisa, D. Dwiputra and F. P. Zen,Stationary solution to charged hairy black hole in AdS4: Kasner interior, rotating shock waves, and fast scrambling,Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) 1228, [2508.02174]

work page arXiv 2025
[41]

H. L. Prihadi, D. Dwiputra, F. Khairunnisa and F. P. Zen,Scrambling in charged hairy black holes and the Kasner interior,Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) 946, [2501.01680]

work page arXiv 2025
[42]

Malvimat and R

V. Malvimat and R. R. Poojary,Fast scrambling due to rotating shockwaves in BTZ,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 126019, [2112.14089]

work page arXiv 2022
[43]

Mezei and G

M. Mezei and G. Sárosi,Chaos in the butterfly cone,JHEP01(2020) 186, [1908.03574]

work page arXiv 2020
[44]

Alvarez-Gaume and E

L. Alvarez-Gaume and E. Witten,Gravitational Anomalies,Nucl. Phys. B234(1984) 269

1984
[45]

Alvarez-Gaume and P

L. Alvarez-Gaume and P. H. Ginsparg,The Structure of Gauge and Gravitational Anomalies,Annals Phys.161(1985) 423

1985
[46]

J. D. Brown and M. Henneaux,Central Charges in the Canonical Realization of Asymptotic Symmetries: An Example from Three-Dimensional Gravity,Commun. Math. Phys.104 (1986) 207–226

1986
[47]

Holographic Gravitational Anomalies

P. Kraus and F. Larsen,Holographic gravitational anomalies,JHEP01(2006) 022, [hep-th/0508218]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006
[48]

Brown-Henneaux's Canonical Approach to Topologically Massive Gravity

K. Hotta, Y. Hyakutake, T. Kubota and H. Tanida,Brown-Henneaux’s Canonical Approach to Topologically Massive Gravity,JHEP07(2008) 066, [0805.2005]. – 39 –

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008
[49]

Semi-classical central charge in topologically massive gravity

G. Compere and S. Detournay,Semi-classical central charge in topologically massive gravity,Class. Quant. Grav.26(2009) 012001, [0808.1911]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009
[50]

J. Tian, T. Lai and F. Omidi,Modular transformations of on-shell actions of (root-)T¯T deformed holographic CFTs,Nucl. Phys. B1007(2024) 116675, [2404.16354]

work page arXiv 2024
[51]

Quantum effective action from the AdS/CFT correspondence

K. Skenderis and S. N. Solodukhin,Quantum effective action from the AdS / CFT correspondence,Phys. Lett. B472(2000) 316–322, [hep-th/9910023]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000
[52]

Topologically Massive Gravity and the AdS/CFT Correspondence

K. Skenderis, M. Taylor and B. C. van Rees,Topologically Massive Gravity and the AdS/CFT Correspondence,JHEP09(2009) 045, [0906.4926]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009
[53]

Black hole scrambling from hydrodynamics

S. Grozdanov, K. Schalm and V. Scopelliti,Black hole scrambling from hydrodynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett.120(2018) 231601, [1710.00921]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[54]

Many-body chaos and energy dynamics in holography

M. Blake, R. A. Davison, S. Grozdanov and H. Liu,Many-body chaos and energy dynamics in holography,JHEP10(2018) 035, [1809.01169]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[55]

On the connection between hydrodynamics and quantum chaos in holographic theories with stringy corrections

S. Grozdanov,On the connection between hydrodynamics and quantum chaos in holographic theories with stringy corrections,JHEP01(2019) 048, [1811.09641]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
[56]

Blake, R

M. Blake, R. A. Davison and D. Vegh,Horizon constraints on holographic Green’s functions,JHEP01(2020) 077, [1904.12883]

work page arXiv 2020
[57]

Fast Scramblers

Y. Sekino and L. Susskind,Fast Scramblers,JHEP10(2008) 065, [0808.2096]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008
[58]

S. H. Shenker and D. Stanford,Black holes and the butterfly effect,JHEP03(2014) 067, [1306.0622]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[59]

S. H. Shenker and D. Stanford,Stringy effects in scrambling,JHEP05(2015) 132, [1412.6087]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[60]

D. A. Roberts and D. Stanford,Two-dimensional conformal field theory and the butterfly effect,Phys. Rev. Lett.115(2015) 131603, [1412.5123]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[61]

D. A. Roberts, D. Stanford and L. Susskind,Localized shocks,JHEP03(2015) 051, [1409.8180]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[62]

D. A. Roberts and B. Swingle,Lieb-Robinson Bound and the Butterfly Effect in Quantum Field Theories,Phys. Rev. Lett.117(2016) 091602, [1603.09298]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[63]

Xu and B

S. Xu and B. Swingle,Locality, Quantum Fluctuations, and Scrambling,Phys. Rev. X9 (2019) 031048, [1805.05376]

work page arXiv 2019
[64]

Quantum Lyapunov Spectrum

H. Gharibyan, M. Hanada, B. Swingle and M. Tezuka,Quantum Lyapunov Spectrum,JHEP 04(2019) 082, [1809.01671]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
[65]

Thermalization and chaos in QED$_{3}$

J. Steinberg and B. Swingle,Thermalization and chaos in QED3,Phys. Rev. D99(2019) 076007, [1901.04984]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
[66]

Y. Gu, A. Kitaev and P. Zhang,A two-way approach to out-of-time-order correlators,JHEP 03(2022) 133, [2111.12007]

work page arXiv 2022
[67]

R. R. Poojary,BTZ dynamics and chaos,JHEP03(2020) 048, [1812.10073]

work page arXiv 2020
[68]

Strings, Branes, Schwarzian Action and Maximal Chaos

A. Banerjee, A. Kundu and R. R. Poojary,Strings, branes, Schwarzian action and maximal chaos,Phys. Lett. B838(2023) 137632, [1809.02090]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023
[69]

S. Das, B. Ezhuthachan, A. Kundu, S. Porey, B. Roy and K. Sengupta,Out-of-Time-Order correlators in driven conformal field theories,JHEP08(2022) 221, [2202.12815]. – 40 –

work page arXiv 2022
[70]

S. Das, B. Ezhuthachan, A. Kundu, S. Porey and B. Roy,Critical quenches, OTOCs and early-time chaos,JHEP07(2022) 046, [2108.12884]

work page arXiv 2022
[71]

S. Das, B. Ezhuthachan and A. Kundu,Real time dynamics from low point correlators in 2d BCFT,JHEP12(2019) 141, [1907.08763]

work page arXiv 2019
[72]

R. Fan, P. Zhang, H. Shen and H. Zhai,Out-of-Time-Order Correlation for Many-Body Localization,Sci. Bull.62(2017) 707–711, [1608.01914]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[73]

Biswas, B

P. Biswas, B. Ezhuthachan, A. Kundu and B. Roy,Moving mirrors, OTOCs and scrambling,JHEP10(2024) 146, [2406.05772]

work page arXiv 2024
[74]

Baishya, A

B. Baishya, A. Chakraborty and N. Padhi,A study of three butterflies: entanglement wedge method, OTOC and pole-skipping,2406.18319

work page arXiv
[75]

Banerjee, A

A. Banerjee, A. Bhattacharyya, P. Drashni and S. Pawar,From CFTs to theories with Bondi-Metzner-Sachs symmetries: Complexity and out-of-time-ordered correlators,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 126022, [2205.15338]

work page arXiv 2022
[76]

Balasubramanian, B

V. Balasubramanian, B. Craps, M. De Clerck and K. Nguyen,Superluminal chaos after a quantum quench,JHEP12(2019) 132, [1908.08955]

work page arXiv 2019
[77]

Craps, M

B. Craps, M. De Clerck, P. Hacker, K. Nguyen and C. Rabideau,Slow scrambling in extremal BTZ and microstate geometries,JHEP03(2021) 020, [2009.08518]

work page arXiv 2021
[78]

Chakrabortty, H

S. Chakrabortty, H. Hoshino, S. Pant and K. Sil,A holographic study of the characteristics of chaos and correlation in the presence of backreaction,Phys. Lett. B838(2023) 137749, [2206.12555]

work page arXiv 2023
[79]

Xu and B

S. Xu and B. Swingle,Scrambling Dynamics and Out-of-Time-Ordered Correlators in Quantum Many-Body Systems,PRX Quantum5(2024) 010201, [2202.07060]

work page arXiv 2024
[80]

S. Das, B. Ezhuthachan, A. Kundu, S. Porey, B. Roy and K. Sengupta,Brane detectors of a dynamical phase transition in a driven CFT,SciPost Phys.15(2023) 202, [2212.04201]

work page arXiv 2023

Showing first 80 references.