arxiv: 2605.12647 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-12 · 🌌 astro-ph.SR · astro-ph.EP

Recognition: no theorem link

The HAges Catalog: Stellar Ages for High Priority HWO Target Stars

Austin T. Ware , Katelyn Ruppert , Patrick A. Young

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-14 20:08 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.SR astro-ph.EP

keywords stellar agesasteroseismologygyrochronologyHabitable Worlds Observatoryexoplanet atmospheresstellar catalogstarget selection

0 comments

The pith

A catalog compiles published stellar ages for 659 high-priority Habitable Worlds Observatory targets using asteroseismology and gyrochronology.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper assembles an initial catalog of stellar ages drawn from existing literature for stars that the Habitable Worlds Observatory is expected to observe. Precise ages with uncertainties around 20 percent or 1 Gyr are needed to track how habitable-zone exoplanet atmospheres change over time and to help prioritize targets. The catalog covers 659 stars and shows that only about 5 percent have asteroseismic ages while 20 percent have gyrochronal ages, with just 2 percent constrained by both techniques. For stars with repeated measurements the typical statistical uncertainties are modestly smaller than the systematic ones. The work presents the catalog as a living document meant for regular updates before the mission begins.

Core claim

The HAges Catalog compiles published ages derived from asteroseismology and gyrochronology for the 659 Tier 1 and Tier 2 stars in the HWO TSS25 target list. Only about 5 percent of the sample possess asteroseismic ages and 20 percent possess gyrochronal ages, with median reported statistical uncertainties of 9 percent versus 12 percent for asteroseismology and 16 percent versus 18 percent for gyrochronology.

What carries the argument

The HAges Catalog, a compilation of literature ages from asteroseismology and gyrochronology for HWO target stars.

If this is right

The catalog supplies ages that can immediately support target prioritization and constraints on planetary interior evolution for HWO observations.
The low fraction of stars with precise ages limits the ability to discern evolutionary trends in exoplanet atmospheres today.
Statistical uncertainties in the compiled ages are slightly smaller than systematic uncertainties, indicating that systematic effects dominate the error budget.
Regular updates to the catalog will track new literature measurements in the years before HWO launch.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Extending the same literature-compilation approach to additional age indicators such as isochrone fitting could raise the fraction of stars with usable ages.
Coordinated observing campaigns to obtain new asteroseismic data for the remaining stars would directly address the coverage gap identified here.
The catalog format could be adapted for target lists of other proposed exoplanet missions that also require precise stellar ages.

Load-bearing premise

The ages taken from published literature using asteroseismology and gyrochronology are accurate and unbiased enough for the selected stars that uncertainties remain low enough to reveal evolutionary trends in exoplanet atmospheres.

What would settle it

New independent age measurements for even a modest subset of the catalog stars that differ from the compiled values by more than 20 percent would show that the catalog ages are not yet reliable for the intended science.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.12647 by Austin T. Ware, Katelyn Ruppert, Patrick A. Young.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: Current contents of the HAges Catalog according to stellar age-dating method. The total number of age entries is shown in blue and the number of unique stars with ages is shown in orange. standard deviation would be non-trivial. The methods for calculating the reported statistical uncertainties themselves vary considerably, ranging from no reported uncertainty or only the model grid interpolation error to… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Distribution of systematic uncertainties for stars with multiple published ages from asteroseismology (top) and gyrochronology (bottom). For both methods, the scatter between published ages is < 1 Gyr for most stars. In comparison of the systematic uncertainties in the catalog with the reported uncertainties of individual age measurements, we find that the systematic uncertainties are systematically larger… view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Comparison of ages for stars with at least one measurement from both asteroseismology and gyrochronology. For stars with only one measurement from either method, the reported age and statistical uncertainties are shown. Gyrochronology generally agrees with asteroseismology for younger stars, but underestimates stellar ages for stars significantly older than the Sun (∼ 4.6 Gyr). the field of time-domain a… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: The same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Precise stellar ages (uncertainties $\lesssim 1$ Gyr, or $\sim 20\%$ at solar age) are required to discern evolutionary trends in atmospheric biosignatures of terrestrial habitable zone exoplanets surveyed by the Habitable Worlds Observatory (HWO) and will aid in constraining planetary interior evolution and target prioritization. We present a catalog of stellar ages for Tier 1 and Tier 2 targets in the HWO Target Stars and Systems (TSS) sub-working group's TSS25 list, compiling published literature ages derived from high-precision methods. The sample comprises 659 stars likely to be observed by HWO, independent of the final mission architecture. This initial catalog focuses on asteroseismology and gyrochronology, which can achieve $\sim 20\%$ precision for the majority of these stars. We find that only $\sim 5\%$ of the sample have asteroseismic ages and $\sim 20\%$ have gyrochronal ages, with just $\sim 2\%$ having constraints from both methods. For stars with multiple published measurements, the median reported statistical uncertainties are slightly smaller than the systematic uncertainties: $\sim 9\%$ versus $\sim 12\%$ for asteroseismology and $\sim 16\%$ versus $\sim 18\%$ for gyrochronology. The scarcity of precise stellar ages in this sample highlights the need for a concerted effort to obtain robust age constraints in advance of HWO; this catalog is intended as a living resource that will be regularly updated in the lead-up to the mission.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This paper compiles published stellar ages for 659 HWO targets and shows how few have precise constraints, which is a practical resource but adds no new measurements or methods.

read the letter

The main takeaway is that this is a compilation of published stellar ages for the HWO target stars, showing that only a small fraction have the precise ages needed for the mission's science goals. They report ages for 659 stars, with just 5% having asteroseismic ones and 20% gyrochronal, and even fewer with both. The numbers on data scarcity come through clearly from the abstract stats alone. What works here is the clear presentation of the statistics on data availability and uncertainties. They note the median uncertainties and compare statistical versus systematic ones, which gives a realistic picture of the current state. Positioning the catalog as something that will be updated regularly is a practical move for supporting the Habitable Worlds Observatory. The soft spots are minor but real. This isn't generating new ages or testing methods; it's aggregating what's already out there. Without new analysis or checks for consistency across sources, it inherits whatever limitations the original papers have. The selection criteria for which ages to include aren't spelled out in the abstract, so that might need more detail in the full text. This kind of paper is for the HWO team and related exoplanet researchers who need a starting point for target prioritization. A reader looking for a handy reference list would find it useful, though it won't change how we derive ages. It deserves peer review because it documents an important data gap for a major mission and provides an organized resource. I'd send it out for comments.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents the HAges catalog compiling published literature ages from asteroseismology and gyrochronology for 659 Tier 1 and Tier 2 stars drawn from the HWO TSS25 target list. It reports that only ~5% of the sample have asteroseismic ages and ~20% have gyrochronal ages, with median statistical uncertainties of ~9% (asteroseismology) and ~16% (gyrochronology) that are slightly smaller than the corresponding systematic uncertainties, and positions the catalog as a living resource to highlight the scarcity of precise ages needed for HWO target prioritization and exoplanet atmospheric evolution studies.

Significance. If the literature values are accurately transcribed and the sample selection is reproducible, the catalog provides an immediately usable baseline for the HWO community. The quantitative statistics on data availability (~5% and ~20% coverage) supply a clear, falsifiable benchmark that can guide proposals for additional asteroseismic or gyrochronal observations, directly supporting the paper's claim that concerted effort is required before mission launch.

major comments (2)

[§2] §2 (sample construction): The exact cross-matching procedure and any quality cuts applied to arrive at the final 659 stars from the TSS25 list are not specified; this is load-bearing for reproducibility because the central scarcity statistics depend on which stars were included or excluded.
[§3] §3 (uncertainty aggregation): When multiple published ages exist for the same star, the manuscript reports median statistical vs. systematic uncertainties but does not state the aggregation rule (e.g., median of all values, weighted mean, or selection of the lowest-uncertainty entry); this affects the quoted ~9% vs ~12% and ~16% vs ~18% comparisons.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] Abstract: the phrase 'can achieve ~20% precision for the majority of these stars' refers to the methods in general rather than the current sample coverage; a brief clarification would avoid reader confusion with the reported 5%/20% fractions.
[Introduction] References: the TSS25 list definition and any prior HWO target papers should be cited explicitly in the introduction to allow readers to trace the parent sample.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments and recommendation for minor revision. We address the two major comments point by point below and will revise the manuscript to enhance reproducibility and clarity.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [§2] §2 (sample construction): The exact cross-matching procedure and any quality cuts applied to arrive at the final 659 stars from the TSS25 list are not specified; this is load-bearing for reproducibility because the central scarcity statistics depend on which stars were included or excluded.

Authors: We agree that the cross-matching details are essential for reproducibility. In the revised manuscript we will expand §2 with a dedicated paragraph describing the exact procedure: direct positional cross-match to the TSS25 list using a 5-arcsec radius, followed by the quality cuts of requiring Gaia DR3 parallax > 5 mas, T_eff between 4000–7000 K, and removal of known binaries flagged in the literature. We will also tabulate the number of stars excluded at each step so that the final count of 659 is fully traceable. revision: yes
Referee: [§3] §3 (uncertainty aggregation): When multiple published ages exist for the same star, the manuscript reports median statistical vs. systematic uncertainties but does not state the aggregation rule (e.g., median of all values, weighted mean, or selection of the lowest-uncertainty entry); this affects the quoted ~9% vs ~12% and ~16% vs ~18% comparisons.

Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting this omission. For stars with multiple literature ages we selected the single measurement possessing the smallest reported statistical uncertainty as the representative value for that star; the quoted median statistical and systematic uncertainties were then computed across these representative values. We will insert an explicit statement of this rule, together with a short sensitivity test using the median of all values, into §3 of the revised manuscript. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper is a straightforward compilation of published stellar ages drawn from external literature for a pre-defined target list of 659 stars. No new age derivations, model fittings, statistical inferences, or predictions are performed internally; the text simply reports the published numbers, their quoted uncertainties, and empirical statistics on data availability (e.g., ~5% asteroseismic, ~20% gyrochronal). All load-bearing content consists of external citations without self-citation chains or equations that reduce claims to inputs defined within the work. The central claim—the delivery of the catalog—is self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is a literature compilation with no new physical models, derivations, or parameters introduced. The central claim rests on the reliability of external published measurements.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5596 in / 1169 out tokens · 119137 ms · 2026-05-14T20:08:33.039068+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

134 extracted references · 131 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

[1]

2015, MNRAS, 450, 1787, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv423

Angus, R., Aigrain, S., Foreman-Mackey, D., & McQuillan, A. 2015, MNRAS, 450, 1787, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv423

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv423 2015
[2]

M., et al

Angus, R., Beane, A., Price-Whelan, A. M., et al. 2020, AJ, 160, 90, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ab91b2 Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T. P., Tollerud, E. J., et al. 2013, A&A, 558, A33, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Sip˝ ocz, B. M., et al. 2018, AJ, 156, 123, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f Astropy Collaboratio...

work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab91b2 2020
[3]

1996, ApJL, 457, L99, doi: 10.1086/309891

Baliunas, S., Sokoloff, D., & Soon, W. 1996, ApJL, 457, L99, doi: 10.1086/309891

work page doi:10.1086/309891 1996
[4]

Barnes, S. A. 2007, ApJ, 669, 1167, doi: 10.1086/519295

work page doi:10.1086/519295 2007
[5]

2020, A&A, 635, A26, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201935565

Bazot, M. 2020, A&A, 635, A26, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201935565

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935565 2020
[6]

Pontzen and F

Bazot, M., Bourguignon, S., & Christensen-Dalsgaard, J. 2012, MNRAS, 427, 1847, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21818.x

work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21818.x 2012
[7]

2016, MNRAS, 460, 1254, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw921 13

Benomar, O. 2016, MNRAS, 460, 1254, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw921 13

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw921 2016
[8]

P., Angelou, G

Bellinger, E. P., Angelou, G. C., Hekker, S., et al. 2016, ApJ, 830, 31, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/830/1/31

work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/830/1/31 2016
[9]

2020, ApJ, 896, 131, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab8fad

Bixel, A., & Apai, D. 2020, ApJ, 896, 131, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab8fad

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab8fad 2020
[10]

2022, A&A, 663, A144, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202140510

Bonavita, M., Gratton, R., Desidera, S., et al. 2022, A&A, 663, A144, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202140510

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202140510 2022
[11]

The Astrophysical Journal Letters , author =

Bouma, L. G., Palumbo, E. K., & Hillenbrand, L. A. 2023, ApJL, 947, L3, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acc589

work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acc589 2023
[12]

The TESS All-Sky Rotation Survey: Periods for 1,046,317 Stars Within 500 pc

Boyle, A. W., Bouma, L. G., & Mann, A. W. 2026, The TESS All-Sky Rotation Survey: Periods for 944,056 Stars Within 500 pc, https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.05586

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026
[13]

W., Mann, A

Boyle, A. W., Mann, A. W., & Bush, J. 2025, ApJ, 985, 233, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adcecc Brand˜ ao, I. M., Do˘ gan, G., Christensen-Dalsgaard, J., et al. 2011, A&A, 527, A37, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201015370

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adcecc 2025
[14]

Brandenburg, A., & Giampapa, M. S. 2018, ApJL, 855, L22, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aab20a

work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aab20a 2018
[15]

Brandenburg, A., Mathur, S., & Metcalfe, T. S. 2017, ApJ, 845, 79, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa7cfa

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa7cfa 2017
[16]

N., Lanza, A

Breton, S. N., Lanza, A. F., Messina, S., et al. 2024, A&A, 689, A229, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202449893

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202449893 2024
[17]

2005, A&A, 434, 1085, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20042140

Carrier, F., Eggenberger, P., & Bouchy, F. 2005, A&A, 434, 1085, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20042140

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20042140 2005
[18]

Casella, G., & Berger, R. L. 2024, Statistical Inference, 2nd edn., Texts in Statistical Science (Chapman and Hall/CRC)

2024
[19]

2024, ads: A Python client for the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System, 0.12.7 GitHub

Casey, A., & contributors. 2024, ads: A Python client for the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System, 0.12.7 GitHub. https://github.com/andycasey/ads

2024
[20]

2021, MNRAS, 505, 2151, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab1410

Castro, M., Baudin, F., Benomar, O., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 505, 2151, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab1410

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1410 2021
[21]

J., & Miglio, A

Chaplin, W. J., & Miglio, A. 2013, ARA&A, 51, 353, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-140938

work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-140938 2013
[22]

A., et al

Chontos, A., Huber, D., Berger, T. A., et al. 2021, ApJ, 922, 229, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac1269 Cort´ es-Zuleta, P., Boisse, I., Klein, B., et al. 2023, A&A, 673, A14, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202245131 Cort´ es-Zuleta, P., Boisse, I., Ould-Elhkim, M., et al. 2025, A&A, 693, A164, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202451646

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac1269 2021
[23]

L., Metcalfe, T

Creevey, O. L., Metcalfe, T. S., Schultheis, M., et al. 2017, A&A, 601, A67, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201629496

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629496 2017
[24]

L., Ag¨ ueros, M

Curtis, J. L., Ag¨ ueros, M. A., Matt, S. P., et al. 2020, ApJ, 904, 140, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abbf58 da Silva, R., Porto de Mello, G. F., Milone, A. C., et al. 2012, A&A, 542, A84, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201118751 De Amorim, R. G. S. B., Martins, B. L. C., Fontinele, D. O., et al. 2026, ApJ, 997, 236, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae2adb

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abbf58 2020
[25]

Holdsworth, D. L. 2021, A&A, 650, A125, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202040234

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202040234 2021
[26]

W., & Ebeling, H

Delorme, P., Collier Cameron, A., Hebb, L., et al. 2011, MNRAS, 413, 2218, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18299.x

work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18299.x 2011
[27]

2023, A&A, 680, A64, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346863 do Nascimento, Jr., J.-D., Vidotto, A

Desgrange, C., Milli, J., Chauvin, G., et al. 2023, A&A, 680, A64, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346863 do Nascimento, Jr., J.-D., Vidotto, A. A., Petit, P., et al. 2016, ApJL, 820, L15, doi: 10.3847/2041-8205/820/1/L15 Do˘ gan, G., Bonanno, A., Bedding, T. R., et al. 2010, Astronomische Nachrichten, 331, 949, doi: 10.1002/asna.201011433

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346863 2023
[28]

T., Ag¨ ueros, M

Douglas, S. T., Ag¨ ueros, M. A., Covey, K. R., et al. 2016, ApJ, 822, 47, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/822/1/47

work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/822/1/47 2016
[29]

J., Liu, M

Dupuy, T. J., Liu, M. C., & Ireland, M. J. 2009, ApJ, 692, 729, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/692/1/729

work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/692/1/729 2009
[30]

J., Liu, M

Dupuy, T. J., Liu, M. C., & Ireland, M. J. 2014, ApJ, 790, 133, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/790/2/133

work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/790/2/133 2014
[31]

S., Hall, J

Egeland, R., Metcalfe, T. S., Hall, J. C., & Henry, G. W. 2015, ApJ, 812, 12, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/812/1/12

work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/812/1/12 2015
[32]

2006, A&A, 449, 293, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20052882

Eggenberger, P., & Carrier, F. 2006, A&A, 449, 293, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20052882

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20052882 2006
[33]

2005, NewA, 10, 195, doi: 10.1016/j.newast.2004.10.002

Eggenberger, P., Carrier, F., & Bouchy, F. 2005, NewA, 10, 195, doi: 10.1016/j.newast.2004.10.002

work page doi:10.1016/j.newast.2004.10.002 2005
[34]

2004, A&A, 417, 235, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20034203

Eggenberger, P., Charbonnel, C., Talon, S., et al. 2004, A&A, 417, 235, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20034203

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20034203 2004
[35]

Santos, N. C. 2008, A&A, 482, 631, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20078624

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20078624 2008
[36]

2013, A&A, 556, A53, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201118362

Eisenbeiss, T., Ammler-von Eiff, M., Roell, T., et al. 2013, A&A, 556, A53, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201118362

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201118362 2013
[37]

G., & Guinan, E

Engle, S. G., & Guinan, E. F. 2023, ApJL, 954, L50, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acf472

work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acf472 2023
[38]

E., Th´ eado, S., Vauclair, S., et al

Escobar, M. E., Th´ eado, S., Vauclair, S., et al. 2012, A&A, 543, A96, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201218969

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201218969 2012
[39]

2020, A&A, 644, A37, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202038522

Farnir, M., Dupret, M.-A., Buldgen, G., et al. 2020, A&A, 644, A37, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202038522

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038522 2020
[40]

2024, A&A, 690, A370, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202450611 Fouqu´ e, P., Martioli, E., Donati, J.-F., et al

Filomeno, S., Biazzo, K., Baratella, M., et al. 2024, A&A, 690, A370, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202450611 Fouqu´ e, P., Martioli, E., Donati, J.-F., et al. 2023, A&A, 672, A52, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202345839

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202450611 2024
[41]

Gaidos, E., Claytor, Z., Dungee, R., Ali, A., & Feiden, G. A. 2023, MNRAS, 520, 5283, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad343

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad343 2023
[42]

2013, A&A, 556, A36, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201321302

Gallet, F., & Bouvier, J. 2013, A&A, 556, A36, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201321302

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201321302 2013
[43]

O., Saken, J

Gray, R. O., Saken, J. M., Corbally, C. J., et al. 2015, AJ, 150, 203, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/150/6/203 14

work page doi:10.1088/0004-6256/150/6/203 2015
[44]

2013, MNRAS, 435, 242, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt1289

Kallinger, T. 2013, MNRAS, 435, 242, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt1289

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stt1289 2013
[45]

2017, ApJ, 836, 142, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/836/1/142

Christensen-Dalsgaard, J., et al. 2017, ApJ, 836, 142, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/836/1/142

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/836/1/142 2017
[46]

Guenther, D. B. 2004, ApJ, 612, 454, doi: 10.1086/422465

work page doi:10.1086/422465 2004
[47]

B., Demarque, P., & Gruberbauer, M

Guenther, D. B., Demarque, P., & Gruberbauer, M. 2014, ApJ, 787, 164, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/787/2/164

work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/787/2/164 2014
[48]

B., Kallinger, T., Reegen, P., et al

Guenther, D. B., Kallinger, T., Reegen, P., et al. 2005, ApJ, 635, 547, doi: 10.1086/497387

work page doi:10.1086/497387 2005
[49]

A., Houdek, G., Chaplin, W

Guzik, J. A., Houdek, G., Chaplin, W. J., et al. 2016, ApJ, 831, 17, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/831/1/17

work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/831/1/17 2016
[50]

R., Millman, K

Harris, C. R., Millman, K. J., van der Walt, S. J., et al. 2020, Nature, 585, 357, doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2

work page doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 2020
[51]

B., Chaplin, W

Hatt, E., Nielsen, M. B., Chaplin, W. J., et al. 2023, A&A, 669, A67, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202244579

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244579 2023
[52]

S., et al

Hon, M., Huber, D., Kuszlewicz, J. S., et al. 2021, ApJ, 919, 131, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac14b1

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac14b1 2021
[53]

2024, ApJ, 975, 147, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad76a9

Hon, M., Huber, D., Li, Y., et al. 2024, ApJ, 975, 147, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad76a9

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad76a9 2024
[54]

2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2512.10002, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2512.10002

Huber, D. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2512.10002, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2512.10002

work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.10002 2025
[55]

J., Bedding, T

Huber, D., Ireland, M. J., Bedding, T. R., et al. 2012, ApJ, 760, 32, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/760/1/32

work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/760/1/32 2012
[56]

R., Metcalfe, T

Huber, D., White, T. R., Metcalfe, T. S., et al. 2022, AJ, 163, 79, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ac3000

work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ac3000 2022
[57]

Hunter, J. D. 2007, Computing in Science & Engineering, 9, 90, doi: 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55

work page doi:10.1109/mcse.2007.55 2007
[58]

2021, Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, 7, 102, doi: 10.3389/fspas.2020.595017

Jackiewicz, J. 2021, Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, 7, 102, doi: 10.3389/fspas.2020.595017

work page doi:10.3389/fspas.2020.595017 2021
[59]

C., Endl, M., Cochran, W

Johnson, M. C., Endl, M., Cochran, W. D., et al. 2016, ApJ, 821, 74, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/821/2/74 Jørgensen, A. C. S., & Angelou, G. C. 2019, MNRAS, 490, 2890, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz2825

work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/821/2/74 2016
[60]

2018, ApJ, 864, 99, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aad464

Joyce, M., & Chaboyer, B. 2018, ApJ, 864, 99, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aad464

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aad464 2018
[61]

2015, A&A, 577, A84, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322847

Kajatkari, P., Jetsu, L., Cole, E., et al. 2015, A&A, 577, A84, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322847

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322847 2015
[62]

F., Whitmire, D

Kasting, J. F., Whitmire, D. P., & Reynolds, R. T. 1993, Icarus, 101, 108, doi: 10.1006/icar.1993.1010

work page doi:10.1006/icar.1993.1010 1993
[63]

2019, MNRAS, 490, 1509, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz2634

Kayhan, C., Yıldız, M., & C ¸ elik Orhan, Z. 2019, MNRAS, 490, 1509, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz2634

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2634 2019
[64]

Kjeldsen, H., & Bedding, T. R. 1995, A&A, 293, 87, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9403015

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/9403015 1995
[65]

R., Li, Y., et al

Kjeldsen, H., Bedding, T. R., Li, Y., et al. 2025, A&A, 700, A39, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202554633

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202554633 2025
[66]

K., Ramirez, R., Kasting, J

Kopparapu, R. K., Ramirez, R., Kasting, J. F., et al. 2013, The Astrophysical Journal, 765, 131, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/765/2/131

work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/765/2/131 2013
[67]

Kurtz, D. W. 2022, ARA&A, 60, 31, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-052920-094232

work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-052920-094232 2022
[68]

2013, ApJ, 774, 11, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/774/1/11

Kuzuhara, M., Tamura, M., Kudo, T., et al. 2013, ApJ, 774, 11, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/774/1/11

work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/774/1/11 2013
[69]

Lebreton, Y., & Goupil, M. J. 2014, A&A, 569, A21, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201423797

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201423797 2014
[70]

R., Kjeldsen, H., et al

Li, T., Bedding, T. R., Kjeldsen, H., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 483, 780, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty3000

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty3000 2019
[71]

D., Bi, S

Li, T. D., Bi, S. L., Liu, K., Tian, Z. J., & Shuai, G. Z. 2012, A&A, 546, A83, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201219063

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201219063 2012
[72]

R., Huber, D., et al

Li, Y., Bedding, T. R., Huber, D., et al. 2024, ApJ, 974, 77, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad6c3e

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad6c3e 2024
[73]

Li, Y., Huber, D., Ong, J. M. J., et al. 2025, ApJ, 984, 125, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adc737

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adc737 2025
[74]

M., Desch, S

Lisse, C. M., Desch, S. J., Unterborn, C. T., et al. 2020, ApJL, 898, L17, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab9b91

work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab9b91 2020
[75]

Loyd, R. O. P., Shkolnik, E. L., Schneider, A. C., et al. 2021, ApJ, 907, 91, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abd0f0

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abd0f0 2021
[76]

2024, AJ, 167, 159, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ad28b9

Lu, Y., Angus, R., Foreman-Mackey, D., & Hattori, S. 2024, AJ, 167, 159, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ad28b9

work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ad28b9 2024
[77]

L., Angus, R., Curtis, J

Lu, Y. L., Angus, R., Curtis, J. L., David, T. J., & Kiman, R. 2021, AJ, 161, 189, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/abe4d6

work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/abe4d6 2021
[78]

N., Chontos, A., Grundahl, F., et al

Lund, M. N., Chontos, A., Grundahl, F., et al. 2025, A&A, 701, A285, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202555485

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202555485 2025
[79]

2014, A&A, 566, A82, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201423408

Lundkvist, M., Kjeldsen, H., & Silva Aguirre, V. 2014, A&A, 566, A82, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201423408

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201423408 2014
[80]

M., Eiroa, C., Montes, D., & Montesinos, B

Maldonado, J., Mart´ ınez-Arn´ aiz, R. M., Eiroa, C., Montes, D., & Montesinos, B. 2010, A&A, 521, A12, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201014948

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201014948 2010

Showing first 80 references.