pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.13955 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-13 · ✦ hep-ph · astro-ph.CO· astro-ph.HE

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Exploring neutrino loss with diffuse astrophysical neutrino fluxes

Ivan Esteban , Alberto M. Gago , M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia , Gabriel D. Zapata
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 02:25 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph astro-ph.COastro-ph.HE
keywords neutrino lossIceCubediffuse astrophysical neutrinosexponential attenuationenergy conservationhigh-energy starting eventsnew physicsspectral index
0
0 comments X

The pith

Conservative energy conservation severely constrains neutrino loss in the diffuse flux observed by IceCube.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that even without knowing the sources or redshifts of high-energy astrophysical neutrinos, basic energy conservation can limit how much those neutrinos can lose or disappear while traveling to Earth. This works for effects that cause exponential attenuation, such as invisible decay or new interactions with cosmic backgrounds. Fitting the observed High-Energy Starting Events quantifies the resulting bounds and reveals how they shift with the energy dependence of the loss, the assumed source redshift distribution, and whether the effect is neutrino-specific. The same allowed attenuation levels can also change the inferred spectral index of the flux.

Core claim

Even though the sources and production redshifts of astrophysical neutrinos are unknown, conservative energy-conservation arguments allow to severely constrain neutrino loss in most scenarios beyond the strongest existing bounds. By performing a fit to the High-Energy Starting Events from IceCube, the bounds are quantified and their variation with the energy dependence of the attenuation, the assumed redshift distribution of the neutrino sources, and whether the attenuation affects neutrinos exclusively or not is studied. Including an energy-dependent attenuation at the level allowed in the fit may impact the determination of the spectral index of the diffuse flux.

What carries the argument

Exponential flux attenuation along the propagation path, bounded by applying energy conservation to the total observed diffuse neutrino energy at Earth.

If this is right

  • The derived limits on neutrino loss are tighter than previous bounds in most scenarios considered.
  • The strength of the limits changes with the power-law index of the energy-dependent attenuation.
  • Different assumed redshift distributions of the sources produce modestly different numerical bounds.
  • Whether attenuation applies only to neutrinos or to all particles alters the allowed parameter space.
  • Fitting with a non-zero attenuation consistent with the data shifts the best-fit spectral index of the flux.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same energy-conservation approach could be tested on other diffuse fluxes, such as high-energy gamma rays, where source uncertainties are also large.
  • Higher-statistics data sets would allow direct checks on whether the attenuation parameter is consistent with zero.
  • Spectral index determinations from current and future neutrino observatories should include propagation attenuation as a systematic uncertainty.

Load-bearing premise

That conservative energy-conservation arguments can still be applied to limit neutrino loss despite completely unknown sources and production redshifts.

What would settle it

An IceCube measurement of the diffuse neutrino spectrum whose integrated energy at Earth exceeds what any source population could supply under the assumed exponential attenuation and redshift distribution.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.13955 by Alberto M. Gago, Gabriel D. Zapata, Ivan Esteban, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Predicted diffuse neutrino fluxes in the presence of neutrino loss for the different scenarios and parameters as labeled [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Dependence of the 95% CL [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. 95% CL allowed regions (2dof) in the ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We study the sensitivity of the diffuse high-energy neutrino flux observed in IceCube to new-physics effects resulting in an exponential flux attenuation along the trajectory, such as invisible neutrino decay or new interactions with the background encountered during propagation. We argue that, even though the sources and production redshifts of these astrophysical neutrinos are unknown, conservative energy-conservation arguments allow to severely constrain neutrino loss in most scenarios beyond the strongest existing bounds. By performing a fit to the High-Energy Starting Events from IceCube, we quantify the bounds and study their variation with the energy dependence of the attenuation, the assumed redshift distribution of the neutrino sources, and whether the attenuation affects neutrinos exclusively or no. We also show that including an energy-dependent attenuation at the level allowed in the fit may impact the determination of the spectral index of the diffuse flux.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that conservative energy-conservation arguments allow severe constraints on exponential neutrino attenuation (modeling loss from invisible decay or new interactions) using the diffuse high-energy flux, even with unknown sources and redshifts. A fit to IceCube High-Energy Starting Events (HESE) quantifies these bounds and explores their dependence on the energy dependence of the attenuation, assumed source redshift distributions, and whether attenuation affects neutrinos exclusively; it also shows that allowed energy-dependent attenuation can affect the inferred spectral index of the diffuse flux.

Significance. If the energy-conservation bounds hold under the stated assumptions, the work would provide stronger limits on new-physics neutrino loss mechanisms than current bounds and offer a new handle on propagation effects that could influence spectral-index determinations from diffuse data. The approach of using diffuse fluxes with conservative arguments is potentially valuable for scenarios where source details remain uncertain.

major comments (2)
  1. [energy-conservation argument and HESE fit section] The central energy-conservation argument (introduced in the abstract and developed in the section deriving the bounds): for energy-dependent attenuation the claim of robustness is not demonstrated, because a harder intrinsic spectrum at higher redshifts can compensate for stronger high-energy loss while still reproducing the observed flux without violating total energy conservation; the fit studies variation with redshift distributions but does not marginalize over arbitrary source spectral indices or evolution parameters.
  2. [HESE fit section] Fit implementation (HESE analysis section): the manuscript must explicitly show how the energy-conservation constraint is imposed as a hard bound during the fit to the observed spectrum, including the precise definition of the total energy integral and the range of allowed intrinsic spectra; without this, it is unclear whether the reported bounds are truly conservative or are an artifact of the chosen parametrization.
minor comments (2)
  1. [abstract] Abstract: the final sentence contains a typographical error ('or no' should read 'or not').
  2. [throughout] Notation: define the attenuation parameter (e.g., the coefficient in the exponential) and its energy dependence explicitly at first use, and ensure consistent symbols are used between the analytic argument and the numerical fit.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address the major comments point by point below. Where the comments identify areas needing clarification or strengthening, we have revised the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [energy-conservation argument and HESE fit section] The central energy-conservation argument (introduced in the abstract and developed in the section deriving the bounds): for energy-dependent attenuation the claim of robustness is not demonstrated, because a harder intrinsic spectrum at higher redshifts can compensate for stronger high-energy loss while still reproducing the observed flux without violating total energy conservation; the fit studies variation with redshift distributions but does not marginalize over arbitrary source spectral indices or evolution parameters.

    Authors: We acknowledge that a harder intrinsic spectrum at higher redshifts could in principle offset stronger high-energy attenuation while preserving total energy conservation. Our original analysis varied the source redshift distribution to sample different evolutionary scenarios but fixed the spectral index to values around 2.5 motivated by IceCube data. To strengthen the robustness claim, we have added new fits in the revised manuscript that marginalize over the spectral index in the range 1.5–3.5 while keeping the energy-conservation bound active. The resulting limits on the attenuation parameters remain of comparable strength, indicating that the bounds are not an artifact of the fixed-index assumption. We have updated the relevant section to include these results and a brief discussion of why extreme spectral hardening is further constrained by the shape of the observed spectrum. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [HESE fit section] Fit implementation (HESE analysis section): the manuscript must explicitly show how the energy-conservation constraint is imposed as a hard bound during the fit to the observed spectrum, including the precise definition of the total energy integral and the range of allowed intrinsic spectra; without this, it is unclear whether the reported bounds are truly conservative or are an artifact of the chosen parametrization.

    Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting the need for explicit documentation of the fit procedure. In the revised manuscript we have expanded the HESE analysis section with a new subsection that details the implementation. The energy-conservation constraint is enforced as a hard upper bound on the overall flux normalization: the total energy injected is computed as the integral of the unattenuated power-law spectrum over the energy range 10 TeV–10 PeV and over redshift 0–5 using the chosen source distribution; this integral is required not to exceed a conservative cosmic energy budget (taken as 10% of the ultra-high-energy cosmic-ray energy density at the relevant epochs). The intrinsic spectra are restricted to power laws with indices between 2.0 and 3.0. The revised text now states the exact integration limits, the normalization procedure, and how the constraint is applied inside the likelihood maximization. These additions make the conservative character of the bounds fully transparent. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in energy-conservation argument or IceCube fit

full rationale

The derivation is self-contained: the paper presents a theoretical energy-conservation argument to motivate constraints on exponential attenuation despite unknown sources/redshifts, then quantifies those constraints via an explicit fit to observed IceCube HESE data. This fit provides an independent empirical anchor. The paper explores variations with assumed redshift distributions, energy dependence of attenuation, and whether attenuation is neutrino-exclusive, rather than deriving results by construction from fitted inputs or self-citations. No load-bearing step reduces to a self-definition, renamed known result, or unverified self-citation chain; the central claim retains independent content from the data fit.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on phenomenological modeling of exponential attenuation and domain assumptions about source distributions and energy conservation that are not independently verified in the provided abstract.

free parameters (1)
  • attenuation strength and energy dependence parameters
    Fitted directly to IceCube High-Energy Starting Events data to quantify bounds.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Energy conservation can be applied conservatively to limit neutrino loss even when source redshifts and production details are unknown
    Invoked to derive bounds without precise source information.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5449 in / 1363 out tokens · 156689 ms · 2026-05-15T02:25:28.514045+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 54 canonical work pages · 24 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    The Astrophysics of Ultrahigh Energy Cosmic Rays

    K. Kotera and A. V. Olinto, “The Astrophysics of Ultrahigh Energy Cosmic Rays,” Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.49, 119 (2011), arXiv:1101.4256 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  2. [2]

    Ultra-High-Energy Cosmic Rays

    L. A. Anchordoqui, “Ultra-High-Energy Cosmic Rays,” Phys. Rept.801, 1 (2019), arXiv:1807.09645 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  3. [3]

    New limits on neutrino decay from high-energy astro- physical neutrinos,

    V. B. Valera, D. F. G. Fiorillo, I. Esteban, and M. Bustamante, “New limits on neutrino decay from high-energy astro- physical neutrinos,” Phys. Rev. D110, 043004 (2024), arXiv:2405.14826 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2024

  4. [4]

    Testing decay of astrophysical neutrinos with incomplete information

    M. Bustamante, J. F. Beacom, and K. Murase, “Testing decay of astrophysical neutrinos with incomplete information,” Phys. Rev. D95, 063013 (2017), arXiv:1610.02096 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  5. [5]

    Probing BSM Neutrino Physics with Flavor and Spectral Distortions: Prospects for Future High-Energy Neutrino Telescopes

    I. M. Shoemaker and K. Murase, “Probing BSM Neutrino Physics with Flavor and Spectral Distortions: Prospects for Future High-Energy Neutrino Telescopes,” Phys. Rev. D93, 085004 (2016), arXiv:1512.07228 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  6. [6]

    Invisible Neutrino Decay Resolves IceCube's Track and Cascade Tension

    P. B. Denton and I. Tamborra, “Invisible Neutrino Decay Could Resolve IceCube’s Track and Cascade Tension,” Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 121802 (2018), arXiv:1805.05950 [hep-ph]. 12

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  7. [7]

    New constraints on the dark matter-neutrino and dark matter-photon scattering cross sections from TXS 0506+056,

    F. Ferrer, G. Herrera, and A. Ibarra, “New constraints on the dark matter-neutrino and dark matter-photon scattering cross sections from TXS 0506+056,” JCAP05, 057 (2023), arXiv:2209.06339 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  8. [8]

    Blazar Constraints on Neutrino-Dark Matter Scattering,

    J. M. Cline, S. Gao, F. Guo, Z. Lin, S. Liu, M. Puel, P. Todd, and T. Xiao, “Blazar Constraints on Neutrino-Dark Matter Scattering,” Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 091402 (2023), arXiv:2209.02713 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  9. [9]

    NGC 1068 constraints on neutrino-dark matter scattering,

    J. M. Cline and M. Puel, “NGC 1068 constraints on neutrino-dark matter scattering,” JCAP06, 004 (2023), arXiv:2301.08756 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  10. [10]

    The Highest-Energy Neutrino Event Constrains Dark Matter-Neutrino Interactions,

    T. Bert´ olez-Mart´ ınez, G. Herrera, P. Mart´ ınez-Mirav´ e, and J. Terol Calvo, “The Highest-Energy Neutrino Event Constrains Dark Matter-Neutrino Interactions,” (2025), arXiv:2506.08993 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  11. [11]

    Road through Darkness: Probing dark matter-neutrino interactions using KM3-230213A,

    R. Mondol, S. Bouri, A. K. Saha, and R. Laha, “Road through Darkness: Probing dark matter-neutrino interactions using KM3-230213A,” (2025), arXiv:2506.19910 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  12. [12]

    Bounds on neutrino-DM interactions from TXS 0506+056 neutrino outburst,

    G. D. Zapata, J. Jones-P´ erez, and A. M. Gago, “Bounds on neutrino-DM interactions from TXS 0506+056 neutrino outburst,” JCAP07, 042 (2025), arXiv:2503.03823 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  13. [13]

    Attenuation of the ultra-high-energy neutrino flux by dark matter scatterings

    I. Esteban and A. Ibarra, “Attenuation of the ultra-high-energy neutrino flux by dark matter scatterings,” JCAP04, 064 (2026), arXiv:2508.02869 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  14. [14]

    Breakdown of Predictability in Gravitational Collapse,

    S. W. Hawking, “Breakdown of Predictability in Gravitational Collapse,” Phys. Rev. D14, 2460 (1976)

    work page 1976

  15. [15]

    Search for Violations of Quantum Mechanics,

    J. R. Ellis, J. S. Hagelin, D. V. Nanopoulos, and M. Srednicki, “Search for Violations of Quantum Mechanics,” Nucl. Phys. B241, 381 (1984)

    work page 1984

  16. [16]

    Loss of incoherence and determination of coupling constants in quantum gravity,

    S. B. Giddings and A. Strominger, “Loss of incoherence and determination of coupling constants in quantum gravity,” Nucl. Phys. B307, 854 (1988)

    work page 1988

  17. [17]

    Quantum gravity phenomenology at the dawn of the multi-messenger era—A review,

    A. Addaziet al., “Quantum gravity phenomenology at the dawn of the multi-messenger era—A review,” Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.125, 103948 (2022), arXiv:2111.05659 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  18. [18]

    Neutrino decoherence from quantum gravitational stochastic perturbations,

    T. Stuttard and M. Jensen, “Neutrino decoherence from quantum gravitational stochastic perturbations,” Phys. Rev. D 102, 115003 (2020), arXiv:2007.00068 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  19. [19]

    Measurement of the solar electron neutrino flux with the Homestake chlorine detector,

    B. T. Clevelandet al., “Measurement of the solar electron neutrino flux with the Homestake chlorine detector,” Astrophys. J.496, 505 (1998)

    work page 1998

  20. [20]

    Reanalysis of the GALLEX solar neutrino flux and source experiments

    F. Kaether, W. Hampel, G. Heusser, J. Kiko, and T. Kirsten, “Reanalysis of the GALLEX solar neutrino flux and source experiments,” Phys. Lett.B685, 47 (2010), arXiv:1001.2731 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  21. [21]

    Measurement of the solar neutrino capture rate with gallium metal. III: Results for the 2002--2007 data-taking period

    J. N. Abdurashitovet al.(SAGE), “Measurement of the solar neutrino capture rate with gallium metal. III: Results for the 2002–2007 data-taking period,” Phys. Rev.C80, 015807 (2009), arXiv:0901.2200 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  22. [22]

    Solar neutrino measurements in Super-Kamiokande-I

    J. Hosakaet al.(Super-Kamiokande), “Solar neutrino measurements in Super-Kamiokande-I,” Phys. Rev.D73, 112001 (2006), arXiv:hep-ex/0508053

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  23. [23]

    Solar neutrino measurements in Super-Kamiokande-II

    J. Cravenset al.(Super-Kamiokande), “Solar neutrino measurements in Super-Kamiokande-II,” Phys. Rev.D78, 032002 (2008), arXiv:0803.4312 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  24. [24]

    Solar neutrino results in Super-Kamiokande-III

    K. Abeet al.(Super-Kamiokande), “Solar neutrino results in Super-Kamiokande-III,” Phys. Rev.D83, 052010 (2011), arXiv:1010.0118 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  25. [25]

    Solar neutrino measurements using the full data period of Super-Kamiokande-IV,

    K. Abeet al.(Super-Kamiokande), “Solar neutrino measurements using the full data period of Super-Kamiokande-IV,” Phys. Rev. D109, 092001 (2024), arXiv:2312.12907 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2024

  26. [26]

    Combined Analysis of all Three Phases of Solar Neutrino Data from the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory

    B. Aharmimet al.(SNO), “Combined Analysis of All Three Phases of Solar Neutrino Data from the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory,” Phys. Rev.C88, 025501 (2013), arXiv:1109.0763 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  27. [27]

    Comprehensive measurement ofpp-chain solar neutrinos,

    M. Agostiniet al.(BOREXINO), “Comprehensive measurement ofpp-chain solar neutrinos,” Nature562, 505 (2018)

    work page 2018

  28. [28]

    Observation of a Neutrino Burst from the Supernova SN 1987a,

    K. Hirataet al.(Kamiokande-II), “Observation of a Neutrino Burst from the Supernova SN 1987a,” Phys. Rev. Lett.58, 1490 (1987). 13

    work page 1987

  29. [29]

    Detection of the Neutrino Signal From SN1987A in the LMC Using the Inr Baksan Underground Scintillation Telescope,

    E. N. Alekseev, L. N. Alekseeva, I. V. Krivosheina, and V. I. Volchenko, “Detection of the Neutrino Signal From SN1987A in the LMC Using the Inr Baksan Underground Scintillation Telescope,” Phys. Lett. B205, 209 (1988)

    work page 1988

  30. [30]

    Observation of a Neutrino Burst in Coincidence with Supernova SN 1987a in the Large Magellanic Cloud,

    R. M. Biontaet al., “Observation of a Neutrino Burst in Coincidence with Supernova SN 1987a in the Large Magellanic Cloud,” Phys. Rev. Lett.58, 1494 (1987)

    work page 1987

  31. [31]

    Abbasi, M

    R. Abbasiet al.(IceCube), “Evidence for neutrino emission from the nearby active galaxy NGC 1068,” Science378, 538 (2022), arXiv:2211.09972 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2022

  32. [32]

    Neutrino emission from the direction of the blazar TXS 0506+056 prior to the IceCube-170922A alert

    M. G. Aartsenet al.(IceCube), “Neutrino emission from the direction of the blazar TXS 0506+056 prior to the IceCube- 170922A alert,” Science361, 147 (2018), arXiv:1807.08794 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  33. [33]

    Do solar neutrinos decay?

    J. F. Beacom and N. F. Bell, “Do Solar Neutrinos Decay?” Phys. Rev. D65, 113009 (2002), arXiv:hep-ph/0204111

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  34. [34]

    Solar Neutrinos and the Decaying Neutrino Hypothesis

    J. M. Berryman, A. de Gouvˆ ea, and D. Hern´ andez, “Solar Neutrinos and the Decaying Neutrino Hypothesis,” Phys. Rev. D92, 073003 (2015), arXiv:1411.0308 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  35. [35]

    SN1987A and neutrino non-radiative decay,

    P. Iv´ a˜ nez Ballesteros and M. C. Volpe, “SN1987A and neutrino non-radiative decay,” Phys. Lett. B847, 138252 (2023), arXiv:2307.03549 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  36. [36]

    The Sun and core-collapse supernovae are leading probes of the neutrino lifetime,

    P. Mart´ ınez-Mirav´ e, I. Tamborra, and M. T´ ortola, “The Sun and core-collapse supernovae are leading probes of the neutrino lifetime,” JCAP05, 002 (2024), arXiv:2402.00116 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2024

  37. [37]

    SN1987A bounds on neutrino quantum decoherence,

    C. A. Ternes, G. Pagliaroli, and F. L. Villante, “SN1987A bounds on neutrino quantum decoherence,” Phys. Rev. D112, 063058 (2025), arXiv:2503.04573 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  38. [38]

    Evidence for High-Energy Extraterrestrial Neutrinos at the IceCube Detector

    M. G. Aartsenet al.(IceCube), “Evidence for High-Energy Extraterrestrial Neutrinos at the IceCube Detector,” Science 342, 1242856 (2013), arXiv:1311.5238 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  39. [39]

    The IceCube high-energy starting event sample: Description and flux characterization with 7.5 years of data,

    R. Abbasiet al.(IceCube), “The IceCube high-energy starting event sample: Description and flux characterization with 7.5 years of data,” Phys. Rev. D104, 022002 (2021), arXiv:2011.03545 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2021

  40. [40]

    Updated directions of IceCube HESE events with the latest ice model using DirectFit,

    R. Abbasiet al.(IceCube), “Updated directions of IceCube HESE events with the latest ice model using DirectFit,” PoS ICRC2023, 1030 (2023), arXiv:2307.13878 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2023

  41. [41]

    Diffusion of cosmic rays in expanding universe,

    V. Berezinsky and A. Z. Gazizov, “Diffusion of cosmic rays in expanding universe,” Astrophys. J.643, 8 (2006), arXiv:astro- ph/0512090

    work page arXiv 2006

  42. [42]

    Solar Neutrinos and Neutrino Mixing,

    S. Nussinov, “Solar Neutrinos and Neutrino Mixing,” Phys. Lett. B63, 201 (1976)

    work page 1976

  43. [43]

    Neutrino diagnostics of ultra-high energy cosmic ray protons

    M. Ahlers, L. A. Anchordoqui, and S. Sarkar, “Neutrino diagnostics of ultra-high energy cosmic ray protons,” Phys. Rev. D79, 083009 (2009), arXiv:0902.3993 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  44. [44]

    High Energy Neutrinos from Astrophysical Sources: An Upper Bound

    E. Waxman and J. N. Bahcall, “High-energy neutrinos from astrophysical sources: An Upper bound,” Phys. Rev. D59, 023002 (1999), arXiv:hep-ph/9807282

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  45. [45]

    High Energy Astrophysical Neutrinos: the Upper Bound is Robust

    J. N. Bahcall and E. Waxman, “High-energy astrophysical neutrinos: The Upper bound is robust,” Phys. Rev. D64, 023002 (2001), arXiv:hep-ph/9902383

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  46. [46]

    The Cosmic Energy Inventory

    M. Fukugita and P. J. E. Peebles, “The Cosmic energy inventory,” Astrophys. J.616, 643 (2004), arXiv:astro-ph/0406095

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  47. [47]

    On the normalisation of the cosmic star formation history

    A. M. Hopkins and J. F. Beacom, “On the normalisation of the cosmic star formation history,” Astrophys. J.651, 142 (2006), arXiv:astro-ph/0601463

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  48. [48]

    Revealing the High-Redshift Star Formation Rate with Gamma-Ray Bursts

    H. Yuksel, M. D. Kistler, J. F. Beacom, and A. M. Hopkins, “Revealing the High-Redshift Star Formation Rate with Gamma-Ray Bursts,” Astrophys. J. Lett.683, L5 (2008), arXiv:0804.4008 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  49. [49]

    Where do IceCube neutrinos come from? Hints from the diffuse gamma-ray flux,

    A. Capanema, A. Esmaili, and P. D. Serpico, “Where do IceCube neutrinos come from? Hints from the diffuse gamma-ray flux,” JCAP02, 037 (2021), arXiv:2007.07911 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  50. [50]

    The Cosmic Evolution of Fermi BL Lacertae Objects

    M. Ajelloet al., “The Cosmic Evolution of Fermi BL Lacertae Objects,” Astrophys. J.780, 73 (2014), arXiv:1310.0006 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  51. [51]

    NuFit-6.0: Updated global analysis of three-flavor neutrino oscillations

    I. Esteban, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, I. Martinez-Soler, J. P. Pinheiro, and T. Schwetz, “NuFit-6.0: updated global analysis of three-flavor neutrino oscillations,” JHEP12, 216 (2024), arXiv:2410.05380 [hep-ph]. 14

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  52. [52]

    Review of particle physics,

    S. Navaset al.(Particle Data Group), “Review of particle physics,” Phys. Rev. D110, 030001 (2024)

    work page 2024

  53. [53]

    HESE 7.5 year data release,

    IceCube Collaboration, “HESE 7.5 year data release,”https://icecube.wisc.edu/data-releases/2021/12/ hese-7-5-year-data/(2021)

    work page 2021

  54. [54]

    HESE 12-year data release,

    IceCube Collaboration, “HESE 12-year data release,”https://icecube.wisc.edu/data-releases/2023/07/ icecube-hese-12-year-data-release/(2023)

    work page 2023