pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.13968 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-13 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Particle Acceleration, Coronal Neutrino Production, and the Diffuse Extragalactic Neutrino Background from Supermassive Black Holes

Rostom Mbarek
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 05:17 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE
keywords neutrino backgroundsupermassive black holesX-ray coronaeSeyfert galaxiesIceCubeproton accelerationdiffuse flux
0
0 comments X

The pith

Supermassive black hole coronae can generate the observed sub-PeV neutrino background through proton acceleration.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a model for neutrino production by protons accelerated in the X-ray emitting regions around supermassive black holes in active galaxies. Using insights from plasma simulations, it links the conditions in these coronae to the efficiency of particle acceleration and subsequent neutrino creation via interactions. The key finding is that when integrated over cosmic history, these sources can fully explain the diffuse neutrino flux detected by IceCube below a few PeV. This matters because it provides a concrete astrophysical origin for a major part of the high-energy neutrino sky without invoking more exotic mechanisms. The model also suggests that magnetic structures near the black holes enable outflows that could produce even higher energy neutrinos.

Core claim

A generalized neutrino luminosity function is constructed for protons accelerated in the X-ray coronae of supermassive black holes. The luminosity depends primarily on the coronal X-ray luminosity and magnetization, with only weak dependence on black hole mass. Cosmological integration of this emission accounts for the sub-PeV diffuse extragalactic neutrino flux observed by IceCube, while cosmic ray-driven outflows enabled by the magnetic field topology allow for additional efficient neutrino production at PeV energies.

What carries the argument

The generalized neutrino luminosity function, which connects coronal X-ray luminosity and magnetization to proton acceleration and neutrino output based on a plasma kinetic simulation framework.

If this is right

  • Neutrino production in these coronae is efficient enough that their total contribution matches the IceCube sub-PeV flux.
  • The output depends mainly on X-ray luminosity and magnetic field strength rather than black hole mass.
  • Magnetic field topology permits cosmic ray-driven outflows that can produce additional PeV neutrinos.
  • These processes may influence the dynamics of the innermost regions of galaxies hosting such black holes.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Future neutrino telescopes could detect spectral features or anisotropies pointing to a Seyfert galaxy origin.
  • If outflows are confirmed, they might contribute to cosmic ray populations in galaxy clusters.
  • Similar acceleration mechanisms could apply to stellar-mass black holes in X-ray binaries, potentially adding a Galactic neutrino component.

Load-bearing premise

The particle acceleration in the coronae follows the specific framework informed by plasma kinetic simulations, and that magnetic topologies permit cosmic ray outflows with further neutrino production.

What would settle it

A precise measurement showing that the sub-PeV neutrino flux spectrum does not match the integrated output from Seyfert galaxies or lacks the expected correlation with X-ray source populations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.13968 by Rostom Mbarek.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. The ratio of escape time [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Expected neutrino flux based on Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Upper Panel: Cooling time for photomeson ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Upper Panel: X-ray luminosity function of active [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present a generalized neutrino luminosity function for protons accelerated in the X-ray coronae of supermassive black holes in Seyfert-like galaxies. A major uncertainty in assessing the diffuse neutrino contribution of these systems is the underlying particle acceleration physics. We address this using a theoretical acceleration framework informed by plasma kinetic simulations, enabling a more self-consistent connection between coronal conditions, nonthermal proton populations, and neutrino production. In this picture, the neutrino luminosity depends primarily on the coronal X-ray luminosity and magnetization, and only weakly on black hole mass. We find that the cosmologically integrated emission from these systems can account for the sub-PeV diffuse extragalactic neutrino flux observed by IceCube. We further argue that, although diffusive confinement is relatively well understood, the magnetic field topology near black holes naturally allows for cosmic ray-driven outflows near the X-ray corona. Such outflows may accompany additional efficient neutrino production at the PeV-level and influence the dynamics of the innermost galactic environment.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper presents a generalized neutrino luminosity function for protons accelerated in the X-ray coronae of supermassive black holes in Seyfert-like galaxies. Using a theoretical acceleration framework informed by plasma kinetic simulations, the neutrino luminosity depends primarily on coronal X-ray luminosity and magnetization (with weak black hole mass dependence). The authors conclude that the cosmologically integrated emission from these systems accounts for the sub-PeV diffuse extragalactic neutrino flux observed by IceCube, and argue that magnetic field topology permits cosmic ray-driven outflows enabling additional PeV neutrino production.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the work would be significant for providing a simulation-informed model connecting coronal plasma physics to the origin of the diffuse neutrino background, offering a plausible AGN contribution to the IceCube flux without strong black hole mass dependence.

major comments (1)
  1. [Section deriving the neutrino luminosity function and its cosmological integration] The central claim requires that the cosmologically integrated neutrino output equals the observed sub-PeV IceCube flux via the luminosity function L_ν(L_X, σ). However, the manuscript provides no explicit range of magnetization σ explored in the plasma kinetic simulations, no tabulated neutrino production efficiency per proton, and no direct comparison to the observed X-ray luminosity function of local Seyferts. Small shifts in average σ or duty cycle would alter the integrated flux by an order of magnitude, so the robustness of the accounting cannot be verified from the presented material.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract claims a 'generalized' luminosity function but does not state its explicit functional form or key parameters; adding a brief equation reference would aid clarity.
  2. [Discussion of outflows and confinement] The statement that 'diffusive confinement is relatively well understood' would benefit from a specific citation to prior work on cosmic-ray transport in coronae.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We appreciate the referee's detailed feedback on our manuscript. The major comment raises important points about the transparency and verifiability of our neutrino luminosity function derivation and cosmological integration. We respond point by point below and plan to incorporate revisions to address these concerns.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Section deriving the neutrino luminosity function and its cosmological integration] The central claim requires that the cosmologically integrated neutrino output equals the observed sub-PeV IceCube flux via the luminosity function L_ν(L_X, σ). However, the manuscript provides no explicit range of magnetization σ explored in the plasma kinetic simulations, no tabulated neutrino production efficiency per proton, and no direct comparison to the observed X-ray luminosity function of local Seyferts. Small shifts in average σ or duty cycle would alter the integrated flux by an order of magnitude, so the robustness of the accounting cannot be verified from the presented material.

    Authors: We agree that additional details are needed to verify the robustness of the integrated neutrino flux. In the revised manuscript, we will include the explicit range of magnetization σ explored in the plasma kinetic simulations, a table of neutrino production efficiencies per proton, and a direct comparison to the observed X-ray luminosity function of local Seyferts. We will also add a sensitivity analysis to show the impact of variations in average σ and duty cycle on the total flux, thereby addressing the concern about order-of-magnitude changes. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation grounded in independent plasma simulations

full rationale

The paper constructs its neutrino luminosity function from a theoretical acceleration framework explicitly informed by plasma kinetic simulations, which are treated as external input. The claimed dependence of neutrino luminosity on coronal X-ray luminosity and magnetization follows from this framework rather than being defined in terms of the target IceCube flux. The cosmological integration is presented as a consistency check that the integrated output can account for the observed sub-PeV flux, without evidence that parameters were adjusted post-hoc to force equality. No self-definitional steps, fitted-input predictions, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the derivation chain. The magnetic topology argument for outflows is offered as an additional qualitative point rather than a quantitative reduction. The overall chain remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a theoretical acceleration framework from plasma simulations and assumptions about coronal conditions and magnetic topology; no explicit free parameters are named in the abstract but magnetization is highlighted as a primary dependence.

free parameters (1)
  • magnetization parameter
    Neutrino luminosity depends primarily on coronal X-ray luminosity and magnetization, implying this is a key adjustable or assumed quantity in the model.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Theoretical acceleration framework informed by plasma kinetic simulations connects coronal conditions to nonthermal proton populations
    The model uses this framework to derive neutrino production self-consistently.
  • domain assumption Magnetic field topology near black holes allows cosmic ray-driven outflows with additional neutrino production
    Invoked to argue for PeV-level neutrino production and outflows.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5471 in / 1351 out tokens · 39807 ms · 2026-05-15T05:17:41.087257+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

122 extracted references · 122 canonical work pages · 39 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    M. G. Aartsen, K. Abraham, M. Ackermann, J. Adams, J. A. Aguilar, M. Ahlers, M. Ahrens, D. Altmann, T. Anderson, M. Archinger, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 081102 (2015), 1507.04005

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  2. [2]

    M. G. Aartsen, K. Abraham, M. Ackermann, J. Adams, J. A. Aguilar, M. Ahlers, M. Ahrens, D. Altmann, K. Andeen, T. Anderson, et al., Astrophys. J.833, 3 (2016), 1607.08006

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  3. [3]

    The spectrum of isotropic diffuse gamma-ray emission between 100 MeV and 820 GeV

    M. Ackermann, M. Ajello, A. Albert, W. B. At- wood, L. Baldini, J. Ballet, G. Barbiellini, D. Bastieri, K. Bechtol, R. Bellazzini, et al., Astrophys. J.799, 86 (2015), 1410.3696

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  4. [4]

    Linking High-Energy Cosmic Particles by Black-Hole Jets Embedded in Large-Scale Structures

    K. Fang and K. Murase, Nature Physics14, 396 (2018), 1704.00015, URLhttp://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/ 2018NatPh..14..396F

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  5. [5]

    Abbasi, M

    IceCube Collaboration, R. Abbasi, M. Ackermann, J. Adams, J. A. Aguilar, M. Ahlers, M. Ahrens, J. M. Alameddine, C. Alispach, J. Alves, A. A., et al., Science 378, 538 (2022), 2211.09972

    work page arXiv 2022

  6. [6]

    M. G. Aartsen, M. Ackermann, J. Adams, J. A. Aguilar, M. Ahlers, M. Ahrens, C. Alispach, K. Andeen, T. An- derson, I. Ansseau, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 051103 (2020), URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevLett.124.051103

    work page 2020

  7. [7]

    Murase, S

    K. Murase, S. S. Kimura, and P. M´ esz´ aros, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 011101 (2020), 1904.04226

    work page arXiv 2020

  8. [8]

    Ajello, K

    M. Ajello, K. Murase, and A. McDaniel, ApjL954, L49 (2023), 2307.02333

    work page arXiv 2023

  9. [9]

    Murase, S

    K. Murase, S. S. Kimura, B. T. Zhang, F. Oikonomou, and M. Petropoulou, Astrophys. J.902, 108 (2020), 2005.08937

    work page arXiv 2020

  10. [10]

    Inoue, D

    Y. Inoue, D. Khangulyan, and A. Doi, ApjL891, L33 (2020), 1909.02239

    work page arXiv 2020

  11. [11]

    Kheirandish, K

    A. Kheirandish, K. Murase, and S. S. Kimura, The Astrophysical Journal922, 45 (2021), URLhttps: //dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac1c77

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac1c77 2021

  12. [12]

    Murase, ApjL941, L17 (2022), 2211.04460

    K. Murase, ApjL941, L17 (2022), 2211.04460

    work page arXiv 2022

  13. [13]

    Halzen and A

    F. Halzen and A. Kheirandish, arXiv e-prints arXiv:2202.00694 (2022), 2202.00694

    work page arXiv 2022

  14. [14]

    Kurahashi, K

    N. Kurahashi, K. Murase, and M. Santander, Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science72, 365 (2022), 2203.11936

    work page arXiv 2022

  15. [15]

    Eichmann, F

    B. Eichmann, F. Oikonomou, S. Salvatore, R.-J. Dettmar, and J. B. Tjus, The Astrophysical Journal 939, 43 (2022), URLhttps://dx.doi.org/10.3847/ 1538-4357/ac9588

    work page 2022

  16. [16]

    Mbarek, A

    R. Mbarek, A. Philippov, A. Chernoglazov, A. Levin- son, and R. Mushotzky, Phys. Rev. D109, L101306 (2024), 2310.15222

    work page arXiv 2024

  17. [17]

    D. F. G. Fiorillo, M. Petropoulou, L. Comisso, E. Peretti, and L. Sironi, ApjL961, L14 (2024), 2310.18254

    work page arXiv 2024

  18. [18]

    Padovani, E

    P. Padovani, E. Resconi, M. Ajello, C. Bellenghi, S. Bianchi, P. Blasi, K. Y. Huang, S. Gabici, V. G´ amez Rosas, H. Niederhausen, et al., Nature Astronomy8, 1077 (2024), 2405.20146

    work page arXiv 2024

  19. [19]

    Padovani, R

    P. Padovani, R. Gilli, E. Resconi, C. Bellenghi, and F. Henningsen, A&A684, L21 (2024), 2404.05690

    work page arXiv 2024

  20. [20]

    D. F. G. Fiorillo, L. Comisso, E. Peretti, M. Petropoulou, and L. Sironi, arXiv e-prints arXiv:2504.06336 (2025), 2504.06336

    work page arXiv 2025

  21. [21]

    Diffuse neutrino flux from relativistic reconnection in AGN coronae

    D. Karavola, M. Petropoulou, D. F. G. Fiorillo, A. Geor- gakakis, L. Comisso, and L. Sironi, arXiv e-prints arXiv:2601.01533 (2026), 2601.01533

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  22. [22]

    D. F. G. Fiorillo, L. Comisso, E. Peretti, M. Petropoulou, and L. Sironi, Astrophys. J.974, 75 (2024), 2407.01678

    work page arXiv 2024

  23. [23]

    Lemoine and F

    M. Lemoine and F. Rieger, A&A697, A124 (2025), 2412.01457

    work page arXiv 2025

  24. [24]

    Le Bihan, M

    S. Le Bihan, M. Lemoine, and F. Rieger, arXiv e-prints arXiv:2603.27749 (2026), 2603.27749

    work page arXiv 2026

  25. [25]

    On The Nonthermal Power Laws In Magnetized Turbulent Plasmas

    R. Mbarek, D. Groˇ selj, and A. Philippov, arXiv e-prints arXiv:2605.03033 (2026), 2605.03033

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  26. [26]

    The X-ray to optical-UV luminosity ratio of X-ray selected Type 1 AGN in XMM-COSMOS

    E. Lusso, A. Comastri, C. Vignali, G. Zamorani, M. Brusa, R. Gilli, K. Iwasawa, M. Salvato, F. Civano, M. Elvis, et al., A&A512, A34 (2010), 0912.4166

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  27. [27]

    A. C. Fabian, ARA&A50, 455 (2012), 1204.4114

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  28. [28]

    J. M. Miller, M. L. Parker, F. Fuerst, M. Bachetti, F. A. Harrison, D. Barret, S. E. Boggs, D. Chakrabarty, F. E. Christensen, W. W. Craig, et al., The Astro- physical Journal Letters775, L45 (2013), URLhttps: //dx.doi.org/10.1088/2041-8205/775/2/L45

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/775/2/l45 2013

  29. [29]

    A. C. Fabian, A. Zoghbi, R. R. Ross, P. Uttley, L. C. Gallo, W. N. Brandt, A. J. Blustin, T. Boller, M. D. Caballero-Garcia, J. Larsson, et al., Nature (London) 459, 540 (2009)

    work page 2009

  30. [30]

    X. Dai, C. S. Kochanek, G. Chartas, S. Koz/suppress lowski, C. W. Morgan, G. Garmire, and E. Agol, Astrophys. J.709, 278 (2010), 0906.4342

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  31. [31]

    PG 1211+143: probing high frequency lags in a high mass AGN

    B. de Marco, G. Ponti, P. Uttley, M. Cappi, M. Dad- ina, A. C. Fabian, and G. Miniutti, MNRAS417, L98 (2011), 1108.3503

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  32. [32]

    E. Kara, E. M. Cackett, A. C. Fabian, C. Reynolds, and P. Uttley, Monthly Notices of the Royal As- tronomical Society: Letters439, L26 (2013), ISSN 1745-3925, https://academic.oup.com/mnrasl/article- pdf/439/1/L26/3423772/slt173.pdf, URLhttps:// doi.org/10.1093/mnrasl/slt173

    work page doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slt173 2013

  33. [33]

    Neronov, D

    A. Neronov, D. Savchenko, and D. V. Semikoz, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 101002 (2024), 2306.09018

    work page arXiv 2024

  34. [34]

    Abbasi, M

    R. Abbasi, M. Ackermann, J. Adams, S. K. Agarwalla, J. A. Aguilar, M. Ahlers, J. M. Alameddine, N. M. Amin, K. Andeen, C. Arg¨ uelles, et al., Astrophys. J. 988, 141 (2025), 2406.07601

    work page arXiv 2025

  35. [35]

    Murase, C

    K. Murase, C. M. Karwin, S. S. Kimura, M. Ajello, and S. Buson, ApjL961, L34 (2024), 2312.16089

    work page arXiv 2024

  36. [36]

    Sommani, A

    G. Sommani, A. Franckowiak, M. Lincetto, and R.-J. Dettmar, Astrophys. J.981, 103 (2025), 2403.03752

    work page arXiv 2025

  37. [37]

    Abbasi, M

    R. Abbasi, M. Ackermann, J. Adams, S. K. Agarwalla, J. A. Aguilar, M. Ahlers, J. M. Alameddine, S. Ali, N. M. Amin, K. Andeen, et al., ApjL1000, L37 (2026), 2602.10208

    work page arXiv 2026

  38. [38]

    A. Das, B. T. Zhang, and K. Murase, Astrophys. J.972, 44 (2024), 2405.09332

    work page arXiv 2024

  39. [39]

    A. C. Fabian, A. Lohfink, E. Kara, M. L. Parker, R. Va- sudevan, and C. S. Reynolds, MNRAS451, 4375 (2015), 1505.07603

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  40. [40]

    D. R. Wilkins, L. C. Gallo, E. Costantini, W. N. Brandt, and R. D. Blandford, Nature (London)595, 657 (2021), 2107.13555

    work page arXiv 2021

  41. [41]

    Note1, this is a fit to the cooling time calculated based on an energy-dependent cross section [?]

    work page

  42. [42]

    Pinning down its precise value will require robust localization of the 10 corona in global GRMHD simulations

    Note2, the value ofζis likely source-dependent, but expected to remain of order unity [16, 25]. Pinning down its precise value will require robust localization of the 10 corona in global GRMHD simulations

    work page

  43. [43]

    Lemoine, Journal of Plasma Physics89, 175890501 (2023), 2304.03023

    M. Lemoine, Journal of Plasma Physics89, 175890501 (2023), 2304.03023

    work page arXiv 2023

  44. [44]

    Kempski, D

    P. Kempski, D. B. Fielding, E. Quataert, A. K. Galish- nikova, M. W. Kunz, A. A. Philippov, and B. Ripperda, MNRAS525, 4985 (2023), 2304.12335

    work page arXiv 2023

  45. [45]

    G. B. Rybicki and A. P. Lightman,Radiative processes in astrophysics(1979)

    work page 1979

  46. [46]

    A. M. Beloborodov, Astrophys. J.850, 141 (2017), 1701.02847

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  47. [47]

    Groˇ selj, H

    D. Groˇ selj, H. Hakobyan, A. M. Beloborodov, L. Sironi, and A. Philippov, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 085202 (2024), 2301.11327

    work page arXiv 2024

  48. [48]

    Saccheo, A

    I. Saccheo, A. Bongiorno, E. Piconcelli, V. Testa, M. Bischetti, S. Bisogni, G. Bruni, G. Cresci, C. Fer- uglio, F. Fiore, et al., A&A671, A34 (2023), 2211.07677

    work page arXiv 2023

  49. [49]

    C. S. Reynolds, A. J. Young, M. C. Begelman, and A. C. Fabian, Astrophys. J.514, 164 (1999), astro- ph/9806327

    work page arXiv 1999

  50. [50]

    Space Telescope and Optical Reverberation Mapping Project. II. Swift and HST Reverberation Mapping of the Accretion Disk of NGC 5548

    R. Edelson, J. M. Gelbord, K. Horne, I. M. McHardy, B. M. Peterson, P. Ar´ evalo, A. A. Breeveld, G. De Rosa, P. A. Evans, M. R. Goad, et al., Astrophys. J.806, 129 (2015), 1501.05951

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  51. [51]

    Space Telescope and Optical Reverberation Mapping Project. I. Ultraviolet Observations of the Seyfert 1 Galaxy NGC 5548 with the Cosmic Origins Spectrograph on Hubble Space Telescope

    G. De Rosa, B. M. Peterson, J. Ely, G. A. Kriss, D. M. Crenshaw, K. Horne, K. T. Korista, H. Netzer, R. W. Pogge, P. Ar´ evalo, et al., Astrophys. J.806, 128 (2015), 1501.05954

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  52. [52]

    E. M. Cackett, M. C. Bentz, and E. Kara, iScience24, 102557 (2021), 2105.06926

    work page arXiv 2021

  53. [53]

    J. M. Shull, M. Stevans, and C. W. Danforth, Astro- phys. J.752, 162 (2012), 1204.3908

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  54. [54]

    Zhdankin, G

    V. Zhdankin, G. R. Werner, D. A. Uzdensky, and M. C. Begelman, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 055103 (2017), URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.118.055103

    work page 2017

  55. [55]

    Particle Acceleration in Relativistic Plasma Turbulence

    L. Comisso and L. Sironi, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 255101 (2018), 1809.01168

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  56. [56]

    Comisso and L

    L. Comisso and L. Sironi, ApjL936, L27 (2022), 2209.04475

    work page arXiv 2022

  57. [57]

    A. M. Hankla, A. Philippov, R. Mbarek, R. F. Mushotzky, G. Musoke, D. Groˇ selj, and M. Liska, As- trophys. J.997, 224 (2026), 2512.01662

    work page arXiv 2026

  58. [58]

    Black Hole Spin and the Radio Loud/Quiet Dichotomy of Active Galactic Nuclei

    A. Tchekhovskoy, R. Narayan, and J. C. McKinney, As- trophys. J.711, 50 (2010), 0911.2228

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  59. [59]

    Liska, A

    M. Liska, A. Tchekhovskoy, and E. Quataert, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomi- cal Society494, 3656 (2020), ISSN 0035- 8711, https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article- pdf/494/3/3656/33145099/staa955.pdf, URL https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa955

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa955 2020

  60. [60]

    Murase, Y

    K. Murase, Y. Inoue, and C. D. Dermer, Phys. Rev. D 90, 023007 (2014), URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevD.90.023007

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.90.023007 2014

  61. [61]

    Ahlers and F

    M. Ahlers and F. Halzen, Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics2017(2017), ISSN 2050-3911, 12A105, https://academic.oup.com/ptep/article- pdf/2017/12/12A105/22075648/ptx021.pdf, URL https://doi.org/10.1093/ptep/ptx021

    work page doi:10.1093/ptep/ptx021 2017

  62. [62]

    Mbarek, D

    R. Mbarek, D. Caprioli, and K. Murase, Astrophys. J. 942, 37 (2023), 2207.07130

    work page arXiv 2023

  63. [63]

    Y. Ueda, M. Akiyama, G. Hasinger, T. Miyaji, and M. G. Watson, Astrophys. J.786, 104 (2014), 1402.1836

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  64. [64]

    Note3, we can relateL x toL bol such thatL x≃Lbol/20 following the prescription by Marconi et al. [119]

    work page

  65. [65]

    T. T. Ananna, A. K. Weigel, B. Trakhtenbrot, M. J. Koss, C. M. Urry, C. Ricci, R. C. Hickox, E. Treis- ter, F. E. Bauer, Y. Ueda, et al., ApjS261, 9 (2022), 2201.05603

    work page arXiv 2022

  66. [66]

    C. Jin, E. Lusso, M. Ward, C. Done, and R. Middei, MNRAS527, 356 (2024), 2310.17866

    work page arXiv 2024

  67. [67]

    Tananbaum, Y

    H. Tananbaum, Y. A vni, G. Branduardi, M. Elvis, G. Fabbiano, E. Feigelson, R. Giacconi, J. P. Henry, J. P. Pye, A. Soltan, et al., ApjL234, L9 (1979)

    work page 1979

  68. [68]

    Zamorani, J

    G. Zamorani, J. P. Henry, T. Maccacaro, H. Tanan- baum, A. Soltan, Y. A vni, J. Liebert, J. Stocke, P. A. Strittmatter, R. J. Weymann, et al., Astrophys. J.245, 357 (1981)

    work page 1981

  69. [69]

    J. D. Silverman, P. J. Green, W. A. Barkhouse, D. W. Kim, T. L. Aldcroft, R. A. Cameron, B. J. Wilkes, A. Mossman, H. Ghosh, H. Tananbaum, et al., Astro- phys. J.618, 123 (2005), astro-ph/0409337

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  70. [70]

    A. T. Steffen, I. Strateva, W. N. Brandt, D. M. Alexan- der, A. M. Koekemoer, B. D. Lehmer, D. P. Schneider, and C. Vignali, AJ131, 2826 (2006), astro-ph/0602407

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  71. [71]

    D. W. Just, W. N. Brandt, O. Shemmer, A. T. Stef- fen, D. P. Schneider, G. Chartas, and G. P. Garmire, Astrophys. J.665, 1004 (2007), 0705.3059

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  72. [72]

    Zheng, G

    W. Zheng, G. A. Kriss, R. C. Telfer, J. P. Grimes, and A. F. Davidsen, Astrophys. J.475, 469 (1997), astro- ph/9608198

    work page arXiv 1997

  73. [73]

    R. C. Telfer, W. Zheng, G. A. Kriss, and A. F. Davidsen, Astrophys. J.565, 773 (2002), astro-ph/0109531

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  74. [74]

    M. L. Stevans, J. M. Shull, C. W. Danforth, and E. M. Tilton, Astrophys. J.794, 75 (2014), 1408.5900

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  75. [75]

    M. A. Malkan and W. L. W. Sargent, Astrophys. J.254, 22 (1982)

    work page 1982

  76. [76]

    Bechtold, B

    J. Bechtold, B. Czerny, M. Elvis, G. Fabbiano, and R. F. Green, Astrophys. J.314, 699 (1987)

    work page 1987

  77. [77]

    W. G. Mathews and G. J. Ferland, Astrophys. J.323, 456 (1987)

    work page 1987

  78. [78]

    Adri´ an-Mart ´ ınez, M

    S. Adri´ an-Mart ´ ınez, M. Ageron, F. Aharonian, S. Aiello, A. Albert, F. Ameli, E. Anassontzis, M. Andre, G. An- droulakis, M. Anghinolfi, et al., Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics43, 084001 (2016), URLhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0954-3899/43/8/ 084001

    work page doi:10.1088/0954-3899/43/8/ 2016

  79. [79]

    Abbasi, M

    R. Abbasi, M. Ackermann, J. Adams, S. K. Agarwalla, J. A. Aguilar, M. Ahlers, J. M. Alameddine, N. M. Amin, K. Andeen, G. Anton, et al., arXiv e-prints arXiv:2402.18026 (2024), 2402.18026

    work page arXiv 2024

  80. [80]

    M. G. Aartsen, M. Ackermann, J. Adams, J. A. Aguilar, M. Ahlers, M. Ahrens, D. Altmann, T. Anderson, C. Ar- guelles, T. C. Arlen, et al., European Physical Journal C75, 116 (2015), 1409.4535

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

Showing first 80 references.