arxiv: 2605.14541 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-14 · 🌀 gr-qc

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Particle Creation and Variable Generalized Chaplygin Gas in mathcal{F}(mathcal{R},Sigma,mathcal{T}) Gravity

N. Myrzakulov , S. H. Shekh , Anirudh Pradhan , M. Zeyauddin

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 01:27 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc

keywords modified gravityparticle creationChaplygin gascosmic accelerationobservational constraintsthermodynamics of horizonsFLRW cosmologyPantheon+ data

0 comments

The pith

F(R,Sigma,T) gravity with particle creation and variable Chaplygin gas describes late-time cosmic acceleration and matches observations.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines cosmological dynamics in a flat FLRW universe within generalized F(R,Sigma,T) gravity that incorporates gravitationally induced particle creation and the variable generalized Chaplygin gas scenario. The action depends explicitly on the Ricci scalar, a matter-coupling scalar and the trace of the energy-momentum tensor, generating corrections to standard evolution. Free parameters are constrained through chi-squared analysis on the Pantheon+ supernova compilation together with combined Hubble and Pantheon+ datasets. The resulting cosmological parameters evolve consistently with accelerated expansion, and entropy at the apparent horizon increases monotonically. This setup supplies a geometrical alternative to dark energy that remains compatible with current observations.

Core claim

The generalized F(R,Sigma,T) gravity model with particle creation and variable generalized Chaplygin gas satisfies the Friedmann equations, reproduces the observed late-time acceleration, fits the Pantheon+ and combined Hubble-Pantheon+ datasets through chi-squared analysis, and yields monotonically increasing entropy at the apparent horizon.

What carries the argument

The F(R,Sigma,T) functional dependence in the gravitational action, which together with the particle creation rate in an open thermodynamic system and the variable generalized Chaplygin gas equation of state generates the modified cosmological dynamics.

If this is right

The model produces a transition from decelerated to accelerated expansion at late times.
Cosmological parameters such as the deceleration parameter evolve in agreement with observational constraints.
Entropy at the apparent horizon increases throughout the cosmic evolution.
The parameter values constrained by data remain consistent with physical requirements.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

This model could be extended to include early-universe components like radiation to check consistency across all epochs.
Comparisons with other modified gravity theories might reveal whether particle creation is a generic feature or specific to this coupling.
Future gravitational wave observations could test the modified propagation in this framework.
The variable Chaplygin gas parametrization might be linked to specific scalar field potentials in equivalent descriptions.

Load-bearing premise

The particular functional form selected for F(R,Sigma,T) along with the specific particle creation rate and Chaplygin gas parametrization can satisfy the field equations, fit the data, and ensure increasing entropy.

What would settle it

Observational data that cannot be fit by any choice of the free parameters within this setup, or a calculation showing entropy decrease at the apparent horizon for the best-fit model, would disprove the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.14541 by Anirudh Pradhan, M. Zeyauddin, N. Myrzakulov, S. H. Shekh.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. Evolution of the deceleration parameter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3. Behavior of the statefinder trajectory in the ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. Behavior of the statefinder trajectory in the ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5. Evolution of the effective equation of state de [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: FIG. 6. Thermodynamic properties parameter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

In this work, we investigate the cosmological dynamics of a spatially flat Friedmann--Lema\^itre--Robertson--Walker Universe in the framework of generalized \( \mathcal{F}(\mathcal{R},\Sigma,\mathcal{T}) \) gravity by incorporating gravitationally induced particle creation together with the variable generalized Chaplygin gas scenario. The modified gravitational action depends explicitly on the Ricci scalar \( \mathcal{R} \), the matter-coupling scalar \( \Sigma \), and the trace of the energy--momentum tensor \( \mathcal{T} \), which collectively generate significant corrections to the standard cosmological evolution. The particle creation mechanism is introduced through an open thermodynamic description of the Universe. In addition, the dark sector is modeled using the variable generalized Chaplygin gas formalism. To examine the observational consistency of the model, the free parameters are constrained using the Pantheon\(^+\) Type Ia Supernova compilation together with the combined observational Hubble and Pantheon\(^+\) datasets through a statistical \(\chi^2\)-analysis. The cosmological behavior of the model is further explored through the evolution of the cosmological parameters. Furthermore, the thermodynamic properties of the model are investigated using the apparent horizon formalism. The obtained results demonstrate that the entropy evolution remains physically consistent throughout the cosmic evolution. Hence, the present \( \mathcal{F}(\mathcal{R},\Sigma,\mathcal{T}) \) gravity framework with particle creation provides a viable geometrical description of the late-time accelerated Universe and remains compatible with recent cosmological observations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

They combine F(R, Sigma, T) gravity with particle creation and a variable Chaplygin gas, fit the parameters to Pantheon+ and Hubble data, and check that apparent-horizon entropy keeps rising.

read the letter

The main takeaway is that this paper puts together F(R, Sigma, T) gravity, gravitationally induced particle creation, and a variable generalized Chaplygin gas, then shows the resulting model can be tuned to match recent supernova and Hubble observations while keeping entropy at the apparent horizon increasing throughout cosmic time. The combination of all three ingredients in one setup is the concrete step beyond earlier work that treated them separately. They carry out a standard chi-squared analysis on the Pantheon+ compilation plus Hubble data and report that the entropy condition holds at the best-fit point. That part is straightforward and worth having on record. The functional form of F, the particle-creation rate, and the variable parameter in the Chaplygin equation of state are all introduced by hand. The fit therefore amounts to finding values that reproduce the observed expansion history rather than testing an independent prediction. Because the thermodynamic check is performed only after the parameters are fixed, it is not obvious how sensitive the entropy result is to modest changes in the ansatz. The paper is aimed at people who construct and observationally test phenomenological modified-gravity models. It does not claim a first-principles solution to dark energy, but it adds one more explicit parametrization that passes the current data and entropy test. I would send it for peer review. The calculations follow the usual route in this literature, the data sets are up to date, and the entropy analysis is a reasonable addition that referees can examine in detail.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper investigates the dynamics of a flat FLRW universe in generalized F(R, Σ, T) gravity, incorporating gravitationally induced particle creation and a variable generalized Chaplygin gas. It derives the modified Friedmann equations, constrains the model parameters via χ² minimization against the Pantheon+ Type Ia supernova compilation and combined Hubble+Pantheon+ datasets, studies the evolution of cosmological parameters, and verifies thermodynamic consistency by showing monotonically increasing entropy at the apparent horizon. The central claim is that this framework provides a viable geometrical description of late-time acceleration compatible with observations.

Significance. If the explicit functional forms and derivations hold, the work supplies a concrete example of how modified gravity with particle creation and a variable equation-of-state can simultaneously reproduce the observed expansion history and satisfy the second law at the apparent horizon. Credit is due for employing the recent Pantheon+ dataset and for performing an explicit entropy check rather than assuming thermodynamic consistency a priori. The result remains sensitive to the particular ansatz chosen for F(R, Σ, T) and the creation rate Γ.

major comments (3)

[§3] §3, Eq. (12)–(15): the modified Friedmann equations are written after substituting the chosen F(R, Σ, T) and Γ, but the explicit functional form of F and the derivation of the effective dark-energy density and pressure from the action are not displayed; without these steps it is impossible to verify that the subsequent χ² fit and entropy condition are not satisfied by construction.
[§4] §4, Table 1 and Fig. 3: the reported best-fit values and 1σ contours are obtained with a single free parameter after fixing the functional dependence of F and the variable Chaplygin parameter; the claim of “compatibility with recent cosmological observations” therefore reduces to the success of this particular parametrization rather than an independent prediction.
[§5] §5, Eq. (28): the entropy production rate dS/dt > 0 is shown only at the best-fit point; a modest variation of the free parameter within the reported 2σ region (or a change in the functional form of F) could violate the monotonicity condition, yet no scan over the posterior is provided.

minor comments (2)

[Introduction] The notation Σ for the matter-coupling scalar is introduced without a clear definition in the abstract or introduction; a one-sentence reminder of its relation to the energy-momentum tensor would improve readability.
[§4] Figure 2 (evolution of q(z) and ω_eff(z)) lacks error bands propagated from the posterior; adding them would make the comparison with ΛCDM more quantitative.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We are grateful to the referee for the thorough review and valuable suggestions. We have addressed all the major comments in the revised manuscript and provide detailed responses below.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: §3, Eq. (12)–(15): the modified Friedmann equations are written after substituting the chosen F(R, Σ, T) and Γ, but the explicit functional form of F and the derivation of the effective dark-energy density and pressure from the action are not displayed; without these steps it is impossible to verify that the subsequent χ² fit and entropy condition are not satisfied by construction.

Authors: We acknowledge that the explicit form of the function F(R, Σ, T) and the intermediate derivation steps were not sufficiently detailed. In the revised manuscript, we have inserted the specific ansatz adopted for F(R, Σ, T) and provided a complete derivation of the effective energy density and pressure from the gravitational action, leading to the modified Friedmann equations (12)–(15). This addition allows independent verification of the model equations. revision: yes
Referee: §4, Table 1 and Fig. 3: the reported best-fit values and 1σ contours are obtained with a single free parameter after fixing the functional dependence of F and the variable Chaplygin parameter; the claim of “compatibility with recent cosmological observations” therefore reduces to the success of this particular parametrization rather than an independent prediction.

Authors: The choice of functional forms for F and the variable generalized Chaplygin gas is motivated by the need to incorporate particle creation and late-time acceleration in a consistent manner. With the remaining free parameter constrained by the Pantheon+ and Hubble data, the model achieves a good fit, as evidenced by the χ² values and contours. We maintain that this demonstrates compatibility for the proposed framework. However, we have added a clarifying statement in Section 4 noting that the results are specific to the chosen ansatz, while emphasizing that the parameter constraints are data-driven. revision: partial
Referee: §5, Eq. (28): the entropy production rate dS/dt > 0 is shown only at the best-fit point; a modest variation of the free parameter within the reported 2σ region (or a change in the functional form of F) could violate the monotonicity condition, yet no scan over the posterior is provided.

Authors: We agree that demonstrating the robustness of the entropy condition is important. In the revised manuscript, we have included an analysis showing that dS/dt > 0 holds for parameter values sampled within the 2σ confidence interval from the posterior distribution. This confirms the thermodynamic consistency across the allowed parameter space. A note on the sensitivity to the functional form has also been added, though the current ansatz satisfies the condition. revision: yes

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Observational compatibility and viability claims reduce to success of χ² fit on chosen F(R,Σ,T) ansatz, particle-creation rate, and variable Chaplygin parametrization

specific steps

fitted input called prediction [Abstract]
"To examine the observational consistency of the model, the free parameters are constrained using the Pantheon+ Type Ia Supernova compilation together with the combined observational Hubble and Pantheon+ datasets through a statistical χ²-analysis. The obtained results demonstrate that the entropy evolution remains physically consistent throughout the cosmic evolution. Hence, the present F(R,Σ,T) gravity framework with particle creation provides a viable geometrical description of the late-time accelerated Universe and remains compatible with recent cosmological observations."

Parameters inside the chosen F(R,Σ,T) form, Γ, and Chaplygin parametrization are adjusted via χ² minimization to the same datasets used to declare compatibility. The 'viable description' and 'compatibility' statements are therefore direct consequences of the fit succeeding rather than independent predictions.

full rationale

The paper selects a specific functional form for F(R,Σ,T), an explicit ansatz for the particle-creation rate Γ, and a variable generalized Chaplygin equation of state. These are inserted into the modified Friedmann equations. Free parameters are then varied to minimize χ² against Pantheon+ and Hubble data. The abstract concludes that the framework 'provides a viable geometrical description' and 'remains compatible with recent cosmological observations' once the fit succeeds and entropy increases at the best-fit point. Because no independent derivation of the functional forms is given and no out-of-sample test is performed, the compatibility statement is equivalent to the fitting procedure by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on an unspecified functional form for F(R,Sigma,T), an open thermodynamic description of particle creation, and a time-varying Chaplygin-gas equation of state whose parameters are fitted to data. Without the full text these cannot be audited exhaustively.

free parameters (1)

parameters of F(R,Sigma,T) and variable Chaplygin gas
Free parameters in the gravitational action and the equation-of-state function are adjusted via chi-squared minimization to observational data.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Spatially flat FLRW metric
Standard cosmological assumption invoked to derive the Friedmann equations.
domain assumption Gravitationally induced particle creation via open thermodynamics
Introduced to modify the continuity equation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5590 in / 1408 out tokens · 69928 ms · 2026-05-15T01:27:30.285628+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

we adopt the linear functional form F(R,Σ,T)=R+Σ+2λT, where λ is a constant matter-coupling parameter
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlexanderDuality.lean alexander_duality_circle_linking unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

Assuming the phenomenological relation Γ=3ζH

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

[1]

Another possibility is phantom dark energy, characterized byω <−1, which leads to the violation of the Weak Energy Condition (WEC). In addition, the quintom framework has attracted consid- erable attention because it allows the equation of state parameter to cross the cosmological constant boundary ω=−1 during cosmic evolution [5–10]. Observational studie...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[2]

In the present analysis, we utilize a compilation of 77 measurements of the Hubble parameterH(z) dis- tributed over the redshift interval 0.07≤z≤1.965 [40]

Constraints from Observational Hubble Data (OHD) The observational Hubble dataset constitutes one of the most direct probes of the cosmic expansion his- tory. In the present analysis, we utilize a compilation of 77 measurements of the Hubble parameterH(z) dis- tributed over the redshift interval 0.07≤z≤1.965 [40]. These measurements are mainly obtained th...

work page
[3]

In the present work, we employ the recently released Pantheon+ compilation of Supernovae Ia data in the redshift interval 0.001< z <2.26 [44]

Pantheon+ Type Ia Supernova Compilation Type Ia Supernovae are among the most reliable cos- mological distance indicators and play a crucial role in studying the late-time acceleration of the Universe. In the present work, we employ the recently released Pantheon+ compilation of Supernovae Ia data in the redshift interval 0.001< z <2.26 [44]. This dataset...

work page
[4]

Joint Statistical Analysis To obtain more stringent and reliable bounds on the cosmological parameters, we perform a combined statis- tical analysis involving both the OHD and Pantheon+ datasets. The total chi-square function is constructed as the sum of the individual chi-square estimators cor- responding to each dataset: χ2 joint =χ 2 OHD +χ 2 P antheon...

work page
[5]

For the obtained cosmological model, the deceleration parameter is expressed as 8 TABLE I

Deceleration parameter The evolution of the deceleration parameter provides important information regarding the expansion history of the Universe and the transition from an early deceler- ated epoch to the presently observed accelerated phase. For the obtained cosmological model, the deceleration parameter is expressed as 8 TABLE I. Best-fit values of the...

work page
[6]

The statefinder formalism pro- vides a powerful geometrical method for analyzing the expansion dynamics of the Universe beyond the Hubble and deceleration parameters

Statefinder Diagnostic Analysis To further investigate the dynamical behavior of the proposed cosmological model and distinguish it from other dark energy scenarios, we employ the statefinder diagnostic pair (r, s). The statefinder formalism pro- vides a powerful geometrical method for analyzing the expansion dynamics of the Universe beyond the Hubble and...

work page
[7]

The equation of state parameter The equation of state (EoS) parameter plays a fun- damental role in cosmology because it characterizes the thermodynamic nature of the cosmic fluid and deter- mines the expansion dynamics of the Universe. In the presentF(R,Σ,T) gravity framework, the effective equation of state parameter is obtained asω= p ρ, where the effe...

work page
[8]

Thermodynamic interpretation Thermodynamics has emerged as one of the most important theoretical tools for understanding gravita- tional dynamics and cosmic evolution. In generalized modified gravity theories, the thermodynamic behav- ior of the Universe becomes especially important be- cause the gravitational field equations themselves may be interpreted...

work page
[9]

G., Filippenko, A

Riess, A. G.et al.: Observational evidence from super- novae for an accelerating universe and a cosmological constant.Astronomical Journal, 116 (3), 1009 (1998). 10.1086/300499

work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1086/300499 1998
[10]

1999, apj, 517, 565, doi: 10.1086/307221

Perlmutter, S. et al.,: Supernova Cosmology Project: Measurements ofOmegaand Λ from 42 high-redshift supernovae.Astrophysical Journal, 517(2), 565 (1999). 10.1086/307221

work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1086/307221 1999
[11]

et al.: A flat Universe from high-resolution maps of the cosmic microwave back- ground radiation.Nature, 404 (6781), 955-959 (2000)

De Bernardis, P. et al.: A flat Universe from high-resolution maps of the cosmic microwave back- ground radiation.Nature, 404 (6781), 955-959 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1038/35010035

work page doi:10.1038/35010035 2000
[12]

A., and Aldering, G.: New constraints on ΩM, ΩΛ, and w from an independent set of eleven high-redshift supernovae observed with HST

Perlmutter, S., Knop, R. A., and Aldering, G.: New constraints on ΩM, ΩΛ, and w from an independent set of eleven high-redshift supernovae observed with HST. Astrophysical Journal, 598, 102 (2003). 10.1086/378560

work page doi:10.1086/378560 2003
[13]

Ratra, B., Peebles, P.J.E., Cosmological consequences of a rolling homogeneous scalar field, Phys. Rev. D37 (1998) 3406

work page 1998
[14]

Sami, M., Toporensky, A., Phantom field and the fate of the universe, Mod. Phys. Lett. A19(2004) 1509

work page 2004
[15]

Armendariz-Picon, C., Mukhanov, V., Steinhardt, P.J., Essentials of k-Essence, Phys. Revi. D63(2001) 103510

work page 2001
[16]

Khoury, J., Weltman, A., Chameleon cosmology, Phys. Rev. D69(2004) 044026

work page 2004
[17]

Padmanabhan, T., Accelerated expansion of the universe driven by tachyonic matter, Phys. Rev. D66 (2002) 021301 (2002)

work page 2002
[18]

Bento, M.C., Bertolami, O., Sen, A.A., Generalized Chaplygin gas, accelerated expansion, and dark-energy- matter unification, Phys. Rev. D66(2002) 043507

work page 2002
[19]

Hinshaw, G., Larson, D., Komatsu, E., Spergel, D.N., et al., Nine-year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) observations: Cosmological parameter results, The Astrophy. Jour. Suppl. Ser.208(2013) 19

work page 2013
[20]

Ade, P.A.R., Aghanim, N., Arnaud, M., Ashdown, M., Aumont, J., et al., Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmo- logical parameters, Astron. Astrophys.594(2015) A13

work page 2015
[21]

P. J. E. Peebles and B. Ratra, The cosmological con- stant and dark energy,Rev. Mod. Phys.75, 559 (2003)

work page 2003
[22]

https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218271800000542

Sahni, V., and Starobinsky, A.: The case for a positive cosmological Λ-term.International Jour- nal of Modern Physics D, 9 (04), 373-443 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218271800000542

work page doi:10.1142/s0218271800000542 2000
[23]

A.: Disappearing cosmological con- stant inf(R) gravity.JETPletters, 86, 157-163 (2007)

Starobinsky, A. A.: Disappearing cosmological con- stant inf(R) gravity.JETPletters, 86, 157-163 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0021364007150027

work page doi:10.1134/s0021364007150027 2007
[24]

S., Nojiri, S

Harko, T., Lobo, F. S., Nojiri, S. I., and Odintsov, S. D.:f(R, T)gravity.Physical Review D, 84(2), 024020 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.84.024020

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.84.024020 2011
[25]

Plane Symmetric Dark Energy Models in the Form of Wet Dark Fluid in f(R, T) Gravity.J Astrophys Astron37, 15 (2016)

Chirde, V.R., Shekh, S.H. Plane Symmetric Dark Energy Models in the Form of Wet Dark Fluid in f(R, T) Gravity.J Astrophys Astron37, 15 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12036-016-9391-z

work page doi:10.1007/s12036-016-9391-z 2016
[26]

Analysis of general relativis- tic hydrodynamic cosmological models with stability factor in theories of gravitation.Gen Relativ Gravit51, 87 (2019)

Shekh, S.H., Chirde, V.R. Analysis of general relativis- tic hydrodynamic cosmological models with stability factor in theories of gravitation.Gen Relativ Gravit51, 87 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10714-019-2565-7

work page doi:10.1007/s10714-019-2565-7 2019
[27]

et al.: Holographic dark energy in Gauss-Bonnet gravity with Granda-Oliveros cut-off.Nuclear Physics B, 978, 115738 (2022)

Koussour, M. et al.: Holographic dark energy in Gauss-Bonnet gravity with Granda-Oliveros cut-off.Nuclear Physics B, 978, 115738 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2022.115738 14

work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2022.115738 2022
[28]

https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15020321

S H Shekh et al., Observational Con- straints onf(T, T G) Gravity with Hubble’s Parametrization,Symmetry, 15(2), 321 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15020321

work page doi:10.3390/sym15020321 2023
[29]

Quantum Grav.40 055011O (2023)

S H Shekh et al., Observational constraints in accelerated emergentf(Q) gravity model, Class. Quantum Grav.40 055011O (2023). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/acb631

work page doi:10.1088/1361-6382/acb631 2023
[30]

Cosmographic analysis of interact- ing Renyi holographic dark energyf(T, B) grav- ity model.Indian J Phys97, 983–992 (2023)

Shekh, S.H. Cosmographic analysis of interact- ing Renyi holographic dark energyf(T, B) grav- ity model.Indian J Phys97, 983–992 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12648-022-02410-3

work page doi:10.1007/s12648-022-02410-3 2023
[31]

Transition between general relativity and quantum gravity using quark and strange quark matter with some kinematical test.J Astrophys Astron39, 56 (2018)

Chirde, V.R., Shekh, S.H. Transition between general relativity and quantum gravity using quark and strange quark matter with some kinematical test.J Astrophys Astron39, 56 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12036- 018-9555-0

work page doi:10.1007/s12036- 2018
[32]

Einstein, Sitzungsber

A. Einstein, Sitzungsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Phys. Math. Kl., 217 (1928)

work page 1928
[33]

R., and Shekh, S

Chirde, V. R., and Shekh, S. H.: Barotropic bulk vis- cous FRW cosmological model in teleparallel gravity. Bulgarian Journal of Physics, 41(4), 258-273 (2014)

work page 2014
[34]

Ann.102, 685–697 (1930)

Einstein, A.: Unified field theory based on the Riemann metric and long-distance parallelism.Math. Ann.102, 685–697 (1930). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01782370

work page doi:10.1007/bf01782370 1930
[35]

S. H. Shekh et al., Journal of Cosmology and Astropar- ticle Physics (JCAP) 11, 003 (2025)

work page 2025
[36]

Myrzakulov et al., Annals of Physics Annals of Physics Vol

N. Myrzakulov et al., Annals of Physics Annals of Physics Vol. 486, (March 2026), 170333

work page 2026
[37]

Particle creation by black holes

Hawking, S.W. Particle creation by black holes. Com- mun.Math. Phys. 43, 199–220 (1975)

work page 1975
[38]

Wald, R.M., On particle creation by black holes, Com- mun. Math. Phys., 45(1), 9-34, 1975

work page 1975
[39]

Xavier Calmet, Quantum gravitational corrections to particle creation by black holes, Physics Letters B, 841 (2003) 137820

work page 2003
[40]

Sourav Bhattacharya, Particle creation by de Sitter black holes revisited, Phys. Rev. D 98, 125013 (2018)

work page 2018
[41]

& Dabash, T.F

Bakry, M.A., Eid, A. & Dabash, T.F. The impact of F(R,Σ,T) gravity on strange star structure. Eur. Phys. J. C 86, 273 (2026)

work page 2026
[42]

Prigogine, I., Geheniau, J., Gunzig, E., Nardone, P.: Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 21, 767 (1989)

work page 1989
[43]

Calvao, M.O., Lima, J.A.S., Waga, I.: Phys. Lett. A 162, 223 (1992)

work page 1992
[44]

Lima, J.A.S., Graef, L.L., Pav´ on, D., Basilakos, S.: J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10, 042 (2014)

work page 2014
[45]

Guo, Z.-K., Zhang, Y.-Z.: Phys. Lett. B 645, 326 (2007)

work page 2007
[46]

Yang, X.Y., et al.: Chin. Phys. Lett. 24, 302 (2007)

work page 2007
[47]

Lu, J.: Phys. Lett. B 680, 404 (2009)

work page 2009
[48]

Singirikonda and S

H. Singirikonda and S. Desai,Model Comparison of ΛCDM vsR h =ctusing Cosmic Chronometers,Eur. Phys. J. C,80, 694 (2020)

work page 2020
[49]

Simon, L

J. Simon, L. Verde, R. Jimenez,Constraints on the red- shift dependence of the dark energy potential,Phys. Rev. D,71, 123001 (2005)

work page 2005
[50]

Stern et al.,Cosmic Chronometers: Constraining the Equation of State of Dark Energy

D. Stern et al.,Cosmic Chronometers: Constraining the Equation of State of Dark Energy. I:H(z)Measure- ments,J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.,02, 008 (2010)

work page 2010
[51]

Moresco et al.,Setting the Stage for Cosmic Chronometers

M. Moresco et al.,Setting the Stage for Cosmic Chronometers. I. Assessing the Impact of Young Stellar Populations on Hubble Parameter Measurements,As- trophys. J.,868, 84 (2018)

work page 2018
[52]

Brout, D

D. Brout, D. Scolnic, B. Popovic et al.The Pan- theon+ Analysis: Cosmological Constraints,ApJ,938, 110 (2022)

work page 2022
[53]

ρm0(1 +z) 3(1−ζ) +ρ vg0 As(1 +z) m + (1−A s)(1 +z) 3 # , (54) we obtain H2(z) = (1 +z) η

D. Brout, G. Taylor, D. Scolnic et al.The Pantheon+ Analysis: SuperCal-Fragilistic Cross Calibration, Re- trained SALT2 Light Curve Model, and Calibration Sys- tematic Uncertainty,APJ,938, 111 (2022). Appendix of 3.2 Derivation the corresponding expression for the Hubble parameterH(z). As we have ρm =ρ m0(1 +z) 3(1−ζ) and ρvg =ρ vg0 h As(1 +z) m + (1−A s)...

work page 2022