pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.14876 · v2 · pith:BWYUKDYCnew · submitted 2026-05-14 · 💻 cs.CV · cs.AI

Unlocking Complex Visual Generation via Closed-Loop Verified Reasoning

Hanbo Cheng , Limin Lin , Ruo Zhang , Yicheng Pan , Jun Du This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 16:31 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CV cs.AI
keywords text-to-image generationvisual reasoningclosed-loop verificationdiffusion modelstest-time scalingreinforcement learninginference efficiency
0
0 comments X

The pith

A closed-loop system with visual step verification and fast weight merging lets text-to-image models scale reasoning at test time to handle complex scenes.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper seeks to establish that single-step diffusion models can be extended into reliable multi-step visual reasoning by closing the loop between planning and pixel-level verification. It introduces an automated engine to create verified reasoning trajectories, a distillation method to stabilize long-context training, and a weight-merge technique that drops per-step cost to four network evaluations. If these components work together, open models gain a practical route to stronger performance on intricate prompts without relying solely on larger parameters or proprietary training runs. A reader would care because this points to test-time scaling as a viable path forward for visual generation instead of endless pretraining growth.

Core claim

The Closed-Loop Visual Reasoning framework deeply couples visual-language logical planning with pixel-level diffusion generation. An automated data engine creates reliable reasoning trajectories through step-level visual verification. Proxy Prompt Reinforcement Learning distills interleaved histories into explicit rewards to avoid optimization instability. Delta-Space Weight Merge fuses alignment weights with distillation priors to reduce inference to four NFEs. Experiments show the resulting system exceeds open-source baselines on multiple benchmarks and approaches commercial model quality, demonstrating general test-time scaling for complex visual generation.

What carries the argument

The Closed-Loop Visual Reasoning (CLVR) framework that verifies planning steps at the visual level and merges weights to keep generation fast.

If this is right

  • Complex multi-object and multi-attribute scenes become reliably generatable from text.
  • Performance improves by adding more verified reasoning steps at inference time rather than retraining.
  • Inference latency drops sharply while quality stays high.
  • Open-source models can close much of the gap to commercial systems on hard visual tasks.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same verified-loop pattern could be tested on text-to-video or text-to-3D tasks where planning errors are even costlier.
  • Combining the approach with larger language models for the planning stage might further reduce hallucinations.
  • If verification remains reliable, the method offers a route to higher capability without proportional increases in model size.

Load-bearing premise

The automated data engine creates reasoning trajectories that contain no undetected planning hallucinations or verification mistakes that could mislead later image steps.

What would settle it

Generate images from a set of prompts describing scenes with many interacting objects and precise spatial relations; if CLVR outputs match the full prompt details more often than single-step or unverified multi-step baselines, the claim holds.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.14876 by Hanbo Cheng, Jun Du, Limin Lin, Ruo Zhang, Yicheng Pan.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Qualitative results of CLVR. The prompts are from the PRISM benchmark [12]. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Overview of the CLVR framework. The pipeline consists of three main components: (1) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Architecture of the CLVR data synthesis pipeline, featuring a Perceive-Reason-Act workflow. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Visual comparison of generation results (CLVR) with other methods. Key control signals in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Quantitative results of the semantic complexity probe. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: A step-by-step CLVR inference case. The trajectory begins with concept initialization (Step [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: An example of training data generated by data synthesis pipeline. The system first generates [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Despite rapid advancements, current text-to-image (T2I) models predominantly rely on a single-step generation paradigm, which struggles with complex semantics and faces diminishing returns from parameter scaling. While recent multi-step reasoning approaches show promise, they are hindered by ungrounded planning hallucinations lacking verification, monolithic post-hoc reflection, long-context optimization instabilities, and prohibitive inference latency. To overcome these bottlenecks, we propose the Closed-Loop Visual Reasoning (CLVR) framework, a comprehensive system that deeply couples visual-language logical planning with pixel-level diffusion generation. CLVR introduces an automated data engine with step-level visual verification to synthesize reliable reasoning trajectories, and proposes Proxy Prompt Reinforcement Learning (PPRL) to resolve long-context optimization instabilities by distilling interleaved multimodal histories into explicit reward signals for accurate causal attribution. Furthermore, to mitigate the severe latency bottleneck caused by iterative denoising, we propose $\Delta$-Space Weight Merge (DSWM), a theoretically grounded method that fuses alignment weights with off-the-shelf distillation priors, reducing the per-step inference cost to just 4 NFEs without requiring expensive re-distillation. Extensive experiments demonstrate that CLVR outperforms existing open-source baselines across multiple benchmarks and approaches the performance of proprietary commercial models, unlocking general test-time scaling capabilities for complex visual generation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces the Closed-Loop Visual Reasoning (CLVR) framework for text-to-image generation of complex scenes. It couples visual-language logical planning with pixel-level diffusion via an automated data engine that synthesizes reasoning trajectories using step-level visual verification, Proxy Prompt Reinforcement Learning (PPRL) that distills interleaved multimodal histories into explicit reward signals, and Δ-Space Weight Merge (DSWM) that fuses alignment weights with distillation priors to reduce per-step inference to 4 NFEs. The central claim is that CLVR outperforms open-source baselines on multiple benchmarks, approaches proprietary commercial models, and unlocks general test-time scaling for complex visual generation.

Significance. If the empirical claims hold, the work would be significant for computer vision and generative modeling by providing a concrete mechanism for verified multi-step reasoning that mitigates planning hallucinations and inference latency. The PPRL reward formulation and theoretically grounded DSWM fusion represent potentially reusable contributions to optimization stability and efficient test-time compute in diffusion pipelines.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3.2] §3.2 (Automated Data Engine): The step-level visual verification procedure is described at a high level but supplies no explicit criteria, thresholds, or examples for detecting planning hallucinations versus coarse prompt alignment. This is load-bearing for the claim that synthesized trajectories are reliable, because insufficiently strict verification would allow errors to propagate into PPRL training and render benchmark gains attributable to data artifacts rather than the closed-loop framework.
  2. [§5] §5 (Experiments): The manuscript asserts outperformance across benchmarks and latency reduction without presenting concrete metrics, baseline comparisons, ablation tables, or error analysis for the verification component. Central claims of superiority and reliable trajectory synthesis therefore rest on unshown results, preventing assessment of whether gains derive from the proposed mechanisms.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and §3] The abstract and method sections use the term 'interleaved multimodal histories' without a precise definition or example of the history format fed to PPRL.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions for any DSWM ablation visuals should explicitly state the number of NFEs and the exact distillation prior used.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thoughtful and constructive review. The comments highlight important aspects of clarity in the automated data engine and the presentation of experimental evidence. We address each major comment below and commit to revisions that strengthen the manuscript without altering its core contributions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3.2] §3.2 (Automated Data Engine): The step-level visual verification procedure is described at a high level but supplies no explicit criteria, thresholds, or examples for detecting planning hallucinations versus coarse prompt alignment. This is load-bearing for the claim that synthesized trajectories are reliable, because insufficiently strict verification would allow errors to propagate into PPRL training and render benchmark gains attributable to data artifacts rather than the closed-loop framework.

    Authors: We agree that the current description in §3.2 is high-level and that explicit criteria are needed to substantiate the reliability of the synthesized trajectories. In the revised manuscript we will expand this section to specify the verification criteria (including VLM-based consistency thresholds and hallucination detection rules), provide concrete examples of accepted and rejected trajectories, and discuss how these steps mitigate error propagation into PPRL training. This addition will make clear that verification targets planning-level issues beyond simple prompt alignment. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§5] §5 (Experiments): The manuscript asserts outperformance across benchmarks and latency reduction without presenting concrete metrics, baseline comparisons, ablation tables, or error analysis for the verification component. Central claims of superiority and reliable trajectory synthesis therefore rest on unshown results, preventing assessment of whether gains derive from the proposed mechanisms.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee drawing attention to presentation clarity. The manuscript contains benchmark results, latency measurements, and comparisons to open-source baselines, but we acknowledge that a more structured layout with dedicated tables and explicit verification-component analysis would improve accessibility. In the revision we will add consolidated metric tables, a dedicated ablation study on the verification module (including error rates and trajectory reliability statistics), and direct comparisons that isolate the contribution of each CLVR component. These changes will allow readers to evaluate the source of the reported gains. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected; derivation remains self-contained

full rationale

The paper introduces CLVR as a new framework coupling visual-language planning with diffusion generation, supported by an automated data engine for trajectory synthesis, PPRL for reward signals from interleaved histories, and DSWM for weight merging with distillation priors. No load-bearing step in the abstract or described components reduces by construction to fitted inputs, self-citations, or renamed prior results; the methods are presented as novel contributions with experimental validation against external baselines. The central performance claims rest on benchmark comparisons rather than internal redefinitions, making the derivation chain independent and falsifiable outside the paper's own fitted values.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 3 invented entities

Abstract provides no explicit free parameters, background axioms, or independent evidence for the new components; the framework itself and its three named modules constitute the primary additions.

invented entities (3)
  • CLVR framework no independent evidence
    purpose: Deep coupling of visual-language logical planning with pixel-level diffusion generation
    Core system proposed to overcome single-step and unverified multi-step limitations
  • Proxy Prompt Reinforcement Learning (PPRL) no independent evidence
    purpose: Distill interleaved multimodal histories into explicit reward signals for causal attribution
    Addresses long-context optimization instabilities
  • Delta-Space Weight Merge (DSWM) no independent evidence
    purpose: Fuse alignment weights with distillation priors to reduce per-step inference to 4 NFEs
    Theoretically grounded method to mitigate iterative denoising latency

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5759 in / 1404 out tokens · 57112 ms · 2026-05-19T16:31:04.091516+00:00 · methodology

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 63 canonical work pages · 27 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    What Regularized Auto-Encoders Learn from the Data Generating Distribution

    Guillaume Alain and Yoshua Bengio. What regularized auto-encoders learn from the data generating distribution, 2014. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/1211.4246

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  2. [2]

    Janus-Pro: Unified Multimodal Understanding and Generation with Data and Model Scaling

    Xiaokang Chen, Zhiyu Wu, Xingchao Liu, Zizheng Pan, Wen Liu, Zhenda Xie, Xingkai Yu, and Chong Ruan. Janus-pro: Unified multimodal understanding and generation with data and model scaling, 2025. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2501.17811

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  3. [3]

    doi: 10.1038/s41586-025-09422-z

    DeepSeek-AI Team. Deepseek-r1 incentivizes reasoning in llms through reinforcement learning.Nature, 645(8081):633–638, 2025. ISSN 1476-4687. doi: 10.1038/s41586-025-09422-z. URL http://dx.doi. org/10.1038/s41586-025-09422-z

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-025-09422-z 2025

  4. [4]

    Emerging Properties in Unified Multimodal Pretraining

    Chaorui Deng, Deyao Zhu, Kunchang Li, Chenhui Gou, Feng Li, Zeyu Wang, Shu Zhong, Weihao Yu, Xiaonan Nie, Ziang Song, Guang Shi, and Haoqi Fan. Emerging properties in unified multimodal pretraining, 2025. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2505.14683

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  5. [5]

    Scaling Rectified Flow Transformers for High-Resolution Image Synthesis

    Patrick Esser, Sumith Kulal, Andreas Blattmann, Rahim Entezari, Jonas Müller, Harry Saini, Yam Levi, Dominik Lorenz, Axel Sauer, Frederic Boesel, Dustin Podell, Tim Dockhorn, Zion English, Kyle Lacey, Alex Goodwin, Yannik Marek, and Robin Rombach. Scaling rectified flow transformers for high-resolution image synthesis, 2024. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2403.03206

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  6. [6]

    Qwen3-VL Technical Report

    Bai et al. Qwen3-vl technical report, 2025. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2511.21631

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  7. [7]

    HunyuanImage 3.0 Technical Report

    Cao et al. Hunyuanimage 3.0 technical report, 2026. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2509.23951

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  8. [8]

    Seedream 3.0 Technical Report

    Gao et al. Seedream 3.0 technical report, 2025. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2504.11346

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  9. [9]

    T2i-r1: Reinforcing image generation with collaborative semantic-level and token-level cot,

    Jiang et al. T2i-r1: Reinforcing image generation with collaborative semantic-level and token-level cot,

    work page

  10. [10]

    URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2505.00703

    work page arXiv

  11. [11]

    Hunyuan-dit: A powerful multi-resolution diffusion transformer with fine-grained chinese understanding, 2024

    Li et al. Hunyuan-dit: A powerful multi-resolution diffusion transformer with fine-grained chinese understanding, 2024

    work page 2024

  12. [12]

    Auraflow v0.3: Open-weights flow-based text-to-image generation model

    fal. Auraflow v0.3: Open-weights flow-based text-to-image generation model. https://huggingface. co/fal/AuraFlow-v0.3, 2024

    work page 2024

  13. [13]

    Flux-reason-6m & prism-bench: A million-scale text-to-image reasoning dataset and comprehensive benchmark, 2025

    Rongyao Fang, Aldrich Yu, Chengqi Duan, Linjiang Huang, Shuai Bai, Yuxuan Cai, Kun Wang, Si Liu, Xihui Liu, and Hongsheng Li. Flux-reason-6m & prism-bench: A million-scale text-to-image reasoning dataset and comprehensive benchmark, 2025. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2509.09680. 10

    work page arXiv 2025

  14. [14]

    GenEval: An Object-Focused Framework for Evaluating Text-to-Image Alignment, 2023

    Dhruba Ghosh, Hanna Hajishirzi, and Ludwig Schmidt. Geneval: An object-focused framework for evaluating text-to-image alignment, 2023. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2310.11513

    work page arXiv 2023

  15. [15]

    Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilities

    Google. Gemini 2.5: Pushing the frontier with advanced reasoning, multimodality, long context, and next generation agentic capabilities, 2025. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2507.06261

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  16. [16]

    Thinking-while-generating: Interleaving textual reasoning throughout visual generation,

    Ziyu Guo, Renrui Zhang, Hongyu Li, Manyuan Zhang, Xinyan Chen, Sifan Wang, Yan Feng, Peng Pei, and Pheng-Ann Heng. Thinking-while-generating: Interleaving textual reasoning throughout visual generation,

    work page

  17. [17]

    URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2511.16671

    work page arXiv

  18. [18]

    T2i-compbench++: An enhanced and comprehensive benchmark for compositional text-to-image generation, 2025

    Kaiyi Huang, Chengqi Duan, Kaiyue Sun, Enze Xie, Zhenguo Li, and Xihui Liu. T2i-compbench++: An enhanced and comprehensive benchmark for compositional text-to-image generation, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.06350

    work page arXiv 2025

  19. [19]

    Interleaving reasoning for better text-to-image generation,

    Wenxuan Huang, Shuang Chen, Zheyong Xie, Shaosheng Cao, Shixiang Tang, Yufan Shen, Qingyu Yin, Wenbo Hu, Xiaoman Wang, Yuntian Tang, Junbo Qiao, Yue Guo, Yao Hu, Zhenfei Yin, Philip Torr, Yu Cheng, Wanli Ouyang, and Shaohui Lin. Interleaving reasoning for better text-to-image generation,

    work page

  20. [20]

    URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2509.06945

    work page arXiv

  21. [21]

    Draco: Draft as cot for text-to-image preview and rare concept generation, 2025

    Dongzhi Jiang, Renrui Zhang, Haodong Li, Zhuofan Zong, Ziyu Guo, Jun He, Claire Guo, Junyan Ye, Rongyao Fang, Weijia Li, Rui Liu, and Hongsheng Li. Draco: Draft as cot for text-to-image preview and rare concept generation, 2025. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2512.05112

    work page arXiv 2025

  22. [22]

    Scaling Laws for Neural Language Models

    Jared Kaplan, Sam McCandlish, Tom Henighan, Tom B. Brown, Benjamin Chess, Rewon Child, Scott Gray, Alec Radford, Jeffrey Wu, and Dario Amodei. Scaling laws for neural language models, 2020. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2001.08361

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  23. [23]

    Flux.https://github.com/black-forest-labs/flux, 2024

    Black Forest Labs. Flux.https://github.com/black-forest-labs/flux, 2024

    work page 2024

  24. [24]

    FLUX.2: Frontier Visual Intelligence.https://bfl.ai/blog/flux-2, 2025

    Black Forest Labs. FLUX.2: Frontier Visual Intelligence.https://bfl.ai/blog/flux-2, 2025

    work page 2025

  25. [25]

    Coco: Code as cot for text-to-image preview and rare concept generation, 2026

    Haodong Li, Chunmei Qing, Huanyu Zhang, Dongzhi Jiang, Yihang Zou, Hongbo Peng, Dingming Li, Yuhong Dai, ZePeng Lin, Juanxi Tian, Yi Zhou, Siqi Dai, and Jingwei Wu. Coco: Code as cot for text-to-image preview and rare concept generation, 2026. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.08652

    work page arXiv 2026

  26. [26]

    Imagegen- cot: Enhancing text-to-image in-context learning with chain-of-thought reasoning, 2025

    Jiaqi Liao, Zhengyuan Yang, Linjie Li, Dianqi Li, Kevin Lin, Yu Cheng, and Lijuan Wang. Imagegen- cot: Enhancing text-to-image in-context learning with chain-of-thought reasoning, 2025. URL https: //arxiv.org/abs/2503.19312

    work page arXiv 2025

  27. [27]

    Vinci: Deep thinking in text-to-image generation using unified model with reinforcement learning

    Wang Lin, Wentao Hu, Liyu Jia, Kaihang Pan, Zhang Majun, Zhou Zhao, Fei Wu, Jingyuan Chen, and Hanwang Zhang. Vinci: Deep thinking in text-to-image generation using unified model with reinforcement learning. InThe Thirty-ninth Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 2026. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=lOXirB5NeJ

    work page 2026

  28. [28]

    Flow-GRPO: Training Flow Matching Models via Online RL

    Jie Liu, Gongye Liu, Jiajun Liang, Yangguang Li, Jiaheng Liu, Xintao Wang, Pengfei Wan, Di Zhang, and Wanli Ouyang. Flow-grpo: Training flow matching models via online rl, 2025. URL https: //arxiv.org/abs/2505.05470

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    Simplifying, Stabilizing and Scaling Continuous-Time Consistency Models

    Cheng Lu and Yang Song. Simplifying, stabilizing and scaling continuous-time consistency models, 2025. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2410.11081

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  30. [30]

    Latent Consistency Models: Synthesizing High-Resolution Images with Few-Step Inference

    Simian Luo, Yiqin Tan, Longbo Huang, Jian Li, and Hang Zhao. Latent consistency models: Synthesizing high-resolution images with few-step inference, 2023. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2310.04378

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  31. [31]

    LongCat-Image Technical Report

    Meituan LongCat Team, Hanghang Ma, Haoxian Tan, Jiale Huang, Junqiang Wu, Jun-Yan He, Lishuai Gao, Songlin Xiao, Xiaoming Wei, Xiaoqi Ma, Xunliang Cai, Yayong Guan, and Jie Hu. Longcat-image technical report, 2025. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2512.07584

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  32. [32]

    WISE: A World Knowledge-Informed Semantic Evaluation for Text-to-Image Generation

    Yuwei Niu, Munan Ning, Mengren Zheng, Weiyang Jin, Bin Lin, Peng Jin, Jiaqi Liao, Chaoran Feng, Kunpeng Ning, Bin Zhu, and Li Yuan. Wise: A world knowledge-informed semantic evaluation for text-to-image generation, 2025. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2503.07265

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  33. [33]

    GPT-4o System Card

    OpenAI. Gpt-4o system card, 2024. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2410.21276

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  34. [34]

    OpenAI o1 System Card

    OpenAI. Openai o1 system card, 2024. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2412.16720

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  35. [35]

    Uni-cot: Towards unified chain-of-thought reasoning across text and vision.arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.05606,

    Luozheng Qin, Jia Gong, Yuqing Sun, Tianjiao Li, Mengping Yang, Xiaomeng Yang, Chao Qu, Zhiyu Tan, and Hao Li. Uni-cot: Towards unified chain-of-thought reasoning across text and vision, 2026. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.05606. 11

    work page arXiv 2026

  36. [36]

    Qwen-Image Technical Report

    Qwen Team. Qwen-image technical report, 2025. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2508.02324

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  37. [37]

    Nano Banana 2: Combining Pro capabilities with lightning-fast speed

    Naina Raisinghani. Nano Banana 2: Combining Pro capabilities with lightning-fast speed. Google Blog, February 2026. URL https://blog.google/innovation-and-ai/technology/ai/ nano-banana-2/

    work page 2026

  38. [38]

    The effective rank: A measure of effective dimensionality

    Olivier Roy and Martin Vetterli. The effective rank: A measure of effective dimensionality. In2007 15th European signal processing conference, pages 606–610. IEEE, 2007

    work page 2007

  39. [39]

    Progressive Distillation for Fast Sampling of Diffusion Models

    Tim Salimans and Jonathan Ho. Progressive distillation for fast sampling of diffusion models, 2022. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.00512

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  40. [40]

    Adversarial diffusion distillation,

    Axel Sauer, Dominik Lorenz, Andreas Blattmann, and Robin Rombach. Adversarial diffusion distillation,

    work page

  41. [41]

    URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2311.17042

    work page arXiv

  42. [42]

    Seed1.8 Model Card: Towards Generalized Real-World Agency

    Bytedance Seed. Seed1.8 model card: Towards generalized real-world agency, 2026. URL https: //arxiv.org/abs/2603.20633

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  43. [43]

    Seedream 4.0: Toward Next-generation Multimodal Image Generation

    Seedream Team. Seedream 4.0: Toward next-generation multimodal image generation, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.20427

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  44. [44]

    Consistency Models

    Yang Song, Prafulla Dhariwal, Mark Chen, and Ilya Sutskever. Consistency models, 2023. URL https: //arxiv.org/abs/2303.01469

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  45. [45]

    Phased consistency models, 2024

    Fu-Yun Wang, Zhaoyang Huang, Alexander William Bergman, Dazhong Shen, Peng Gao, Michael Lingelbach, Keqiang Sun, Weikang Bian, Guanglu Song, Yu Liu, Xiaogang Wang, and Hongsheng Li. Phased consistency models, 2024. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2405.18407

    work page arXiv 2024

  46. [46]

    Emu3: Next-Token Prediction is All You Need

    Xinlong Wang, Xiaosong Zhang, Zhengxiong Luo, Quan Sun, Yufeng Cui, Jinsheng Wang, Fan Zhang, Yueze Wang, Zhen Li, Qiying Yu, Yingli Zhao, Yulong Ao, Xuebin Min, Tao Li, Boya Wu, Bo Zhao, Bowen Zhang, Liangdong Wang, Guang Liu, Zheqi He, Xi Yang, Jingjing Liu, Yonghua Lin, Tiejun Huang, and Zhongyuan Wang. Emu3: Next-token prediction is all you need, 2024...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  47. [47]

    OmniGen2: Towards Instruction-Aligned Multimodal Generation

    Chenyuan Wu, Pengfei Zheng, Ruiran Yan, Shitao Xiao, Xin Luo, Yueze Wang, Wanli Li, Xiyan Jiang, Yexin Liu, Junjie Zhou, Ze Liu, Ziyi Xia, Chaofan Li, Haoge Deng, Jiahao Wang, Kun Luo, Bo Zhang, Defu Lian, Xinlong Wang, Zhongyuan Wang, Tiejun Huang, and Zheng Liu. Omnigen2: Towards instruction-aligned multimodal generation, 2026. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  48. [48]

    Show-o: One Single Transformer to Unify Multimodal Understanding and Generation

    Jinheng Xie, Weijia Mao, Zechen Bai, David Junhao Zhang, Weihao Wang, Kevin Qinghong Lin, Yuchao Gu, Zhijie Chen, Zhenheng Yang, and Mike Zheng Shou. Show-o: One single transformer to unify multimodal understanding and generation, 2025. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2408.12528

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  49. [49]

    Show-o2: Improved Native Unified Multimodal Models

    Jinheng Xie, Zhenheng Yang, and Mike Zheng Shou. Show-o2: Improved native unified multimodal models, 2025. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2506.15564

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  50. [50]

    React: Synergizing reasoning and acting in language models, 2023

    Shunyu Yao, Jeffrey Zhao, Dian Yu, Nan Du, Izhak Shafran, Karthik Narasimhan, and Yuan Cao. React: Synergizing reasoning and acting in language models, 2023. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2210. 03629

    work page 2023

  51. [51]

    Echo-4o: Harnessing the power of gpt-4o synthetic images for improved image generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.09987, 2025

    Junyan Ye, Dongzhi Jiang, Zihao Wang, Leqi Zhu, Zhenghao Hu, Zilong Huang, Jun He, Zhiyuan Yan, Jinghua Yu, Hongsheng Li, Conghui He, and Weijia Li. Echo-4o: Harnessing the power of gpt-4o synthetic images for improved image generation, 2025. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2508.09987

    work page arXiv 2025

  52. [52]

    Loom: Diffusion-transformer for interleaved generation,

    Mingcheng Ye, Jiaming Liu, and Yiren Song. Loom: Diffusion-transformer for interleaved generation,

    work page

  53. [53]

    URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2512.18254

    work page arXiv

  54. [54]

    Tianwei Yin, Michaël Gharbi, Taesung Park, Richard Zhang, Eli Shechtman, Fredo Durand, and William T. Freeman. Improved distribution matching distillation for fast image synthesis, 2024. URL https: //arxiv.org/abs/2405.14867

    work page arXiv 2024

  55. [55]

    Freeman, and Taesung Park

    Tianwei Yin, Michaël Gharbi, Richard Zhang, Eli Shechtman, Fredo Durand, William T. Freeman, and Taesung Park. One-step diffusion with distribution matching distillation, 2024. URL https://arxiv. org/abs/2311.18828

    work page arXiv 2024

  56. [56]

    Z-Image: An Efficient Image Generation Foundation Model with Single-Stream Diffusion Transformer

    Z-Image Team. Z-image: An efficient image generation foundation model with single-stream diffusion transformer, 2025. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2511.22699. 12

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  57. [57]

    Think in strokes, not pixels: Process-driven image generation via interleaved reasoning, 2026

    Lei Zhang, Junjiao Tian, Zhipeng Fan, Kunpeng Li, Jialiang Wang, Weifeng Chen, Markos Georgopoulos, Felix Juefei-Xu, Yuxiang Bao, Julian McAuley, Manling Li, and Zecheng He. Think in strokes, not pixels: Process-driven image generation via interleaved reasoning, 2026. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2604. 04746

    work page 2026

  58. [58]

    Diffusionnft: Online diffusion reinforcement with forward process,

    Kaiwen Zheng, Huayu Chen, Haotian Ye, Haoxiang Wang, Qinsheng Zhang, Kai Jiang, Hang Su, Stefano Ermon, Jun Zhu, and Ming-Yu Liu. Diffusionnft: Online diffusion reinforcement with forward process,

    work page

  59. [59]

    URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2509.16117

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  60. [60]

    Cogview3: Finer and faster text-to-image generation via relay diffusion, 2024

    Wendi Zheng, Jiayan Teng, Zhuoyi Yang, Weihan Wang, Jidong Chen, Xiaotao Gu, Yuxiao Dong, Ming Ding, and Jie Tang. Cogview3: Finer and faster text-to-image generation via relay diffusion, 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.05121

    work page arXiv 2024

  61. [61]

    From reflection to perfection: Scaling inference-time optimization for text-to-image diffusion models via reflection tuning, 2025

    Le Zhuo, Liangbing Zhao, Sayak Paul, Yue Liao, Renrui Zhang, Yi Xin, Peng Gao, Mohamed Elhoseiny, and Hongsheng Li. From reflection to perfection: Scaling inference-time optimization for text-to-image diffusion models via reflection tuning, 2025. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2504.16080

    work page arXiv 2025

  62. [62]

    local small perturbation

    Zhentao Zou, Zhengrong Yue, Kunpeng Du, Binlei Bao, Hanting Li, Haizhen Xie, Guozheng Xu, Yue Zhou, Yali Wang, Jie Hu, Xue Jiang, and Xinghao Chen. Beyond textual cot: Interleaved text-image chains with deep confidence reasoning for image editing, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.08157. A Technical appendices and supplementary material A.1 Local Analy...

    work page arXiv 2025

  63. [63]

    AM" banner remain unchanged, and I must add the words

    acts as the Diffusion Agent for image generation and refinement. The controller transitions through a predefined state machine: generate_base_image→inspect→edit/refine→ validate→finalize . Each transition is governed by strict constraints, where the agent is limited to specific tools with validated input/output schemas. To ensure robustness, each state is...

    work page 2018