pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.17563 · v1 · pith:XSCUPJJJnew · submitted 2026-05-17 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE · hep-ph· nucl-th

Charged-current neutrino opacity within the relativistic Hartree-Fock framework for astrophysical simulations of core-collapse supernovae and binary neutron star mergers

Kamil Soko{\l}owski , Anil Kumar , Tobias Fischer This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 22:27 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE hep-phnucl-th
keywords neutrino opacityrelativistic Hartree-Fockcore-collapse supernovaeneutron star mergerscharged-current weak ratesnuclear medium effectsweak interactions
0
0 comments X

The pith

Relativistic Hartree-Fock neutrino opacities reveal large discrepancies with relativistic mean-field models in dense matter.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a relativistic Hartree-Fock approach that includes momentum-dependent nucleon self-energies to compute charged-current neutrino and antineutrino opacities. These rates enter simulations of core-collapse supernovae and binary neutron star mergers, where neutrinos control energy transport, heating, cooling, lepton number, and nucleosynthesis conditions. The new calculations produce weak rates that differ markedly from those obtained with standard relativistic mean-field models, shifting the size of previously reported medium-dependent modifications. Accurate opacities therefore change the predicted neutrino fluxes and spectra that observers and modelers rely on.

Core claim

Incorporating explicitly momentum-dependent nuclear interactions through the relativistic Hartree-Fock framework yields neutrino and antineutrino opacities that differ substantially from those of commonly used relativistic mean-field models, with a notable shift in the magnitude of medium-dependent modifications that had been associated with the mean-field treatment.

What carries the argument

Relativistic Hartree-Fock approach with momentum-dependent nucleon self-energies used to evaluate charged-current weak rates.

If this is right

  • Revised neutrino heating and cooling rates in supernova simulations alter the predicted explosion dynamics.
  • Changed lepton-number transport modifies the electron fraction and nucleosynthesis yields in merger ejecta.
  • Updated neutrino spectra affect detection rates at neutrino observatories.
  • Medium effects in other weak processes must be recomputed consistently within the same framework.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The shift may reduce or enhance the neutrino-driven wind conditions that set the neutron-to-proton ratio in outflows.
  • Similar revisions could appear in calculations of neutrino mean free paths inside cold neutron stars.
  • Simulations that adopt the new rates can be checked against multi-messenger signals from nearby supernovae.

Load-bearing premise

The relativistic Hartree-Fock framework with the chosen momentum-dependent interactions and self-energies provides a sufficiently accurate description of the nuclear medium effects on charged-current weak rates without requiring additional corrections from correlations beyond Hartree-Fock.

What would settle it

Numerical evaluation of charged-current opacities at representative densities around 0.1 fm^{-3} and temperatures of a few tens of MeV, followed by direct side-by-side comparison with relativistic mean-field results to confirm or refute the reported substantial shift in medium modifications.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.17563 by Anil Kumar, Kamil Soko{\l}owski, Tobias Fischer.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Diagrammatic form of the neutrino self-energy, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Hartree-Fock nucleon self-energy components (black lines): scalar Σ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Angle integrated neutrino absorption rate, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The same as Fig. 3 but for the charged-current process involving electron antineutrinos, ¯ν [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Neutrino opacity as a function of the incoming (anti)neutrino energy, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Neutrino opacity as a function of the normalized baryon density, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Comparison of RHF (solid lines) and the reduced RMF [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Neutrino opacity, at the leading-order hadronic vertex contributions, as a function of the normalized number density, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_9.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Neutrinos and their weak interactions play a vital role in the physics of core-collapse supernovae and binary neutron star mergers. Their description within astrophysical simulations, including the weak rates, is of pivotal importance not only for the prediction of accurate neutrino fluxes and spectra, including the associated conditions relevant to nucleosynthesis, neutrinos are also responsible for heating and cooling of the stellar plasma as well as the transport of lepton number and entropy. In the present article, we develop an essential improvement of the description of the underlying nuclear medium, necessary for the calculations of charged-current weak rates, with the inclusion of explicitly momentum-dependent nuclear interactions. To this end, we introduce the relativistic Hartree-Fock (RHF) approach and the associated momentum-dependent nucleon self-energies. We discuss the resulting neutrino and antineutrino opacities and find large discrepancies comparing the weak rates at the RHF level with those of commonly used relativistic mean-field (RMF) models; in particular, we observe a substantial shift of previously reported large medium-dependent modifications associated with the RMF approach.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper introduces a relativistic Hartree-Fock (RHF) framework that incorporates explicitly momentum-dependent nucleon self-energies to compute charged-current neutrino and antineutrino opacities. These are intended for use in simulations of core-collapse supernovae and binary neutron star mergers. The central result is a comparison showing large discrepancies with opacities obtained from standard relativistic mean-field (RMF) models, including a substantial shift in the previously reported medium-dependent modifications to the weak rates.

Significance. If the reported differences are shown to originate specifically from the inclusion of Fock terms and momentum dependence rather than from variations in the underlying meson couplings, the work would provide a more consistent treatment of nuclear medium effects on weak interactions. This could affect neutrino heating, lepton-number transport, and nucleosynthesis yields in astrophysical environments.

major comments (1)
  1. The attribution of the observed shift in medium modifications to the RHF framework (rather than to differences in parametrization) is load-bearing for the central claim. The manuscript must demonstrate that the same Lagrangian density and density-dependent couplings are employed in both the RHF and RMF calculations; otherwise the discrepancies cannot be cleanly ascribed to the explicit Fock terms and momentum-dependent self-energies.
minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract would benefit from a concise statement of the specific interaction (e.g., which meson-exchange model or parameter set) adopted for the RHF self-energies.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for identifying a key point that strengthens the central claim. We address the major comment below and are happy to revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The attribution of the observed shift in medium modifications to the RHF framework (rather than to differences in parametrization) is load-bearing for the central claim. The manuscript must demonstrate that the same Lagrangian density and density-dependent couplings are employed in both the RHF and RMF calculations; otherwise the discrepancies cannot be cleanly ascribed to the explicit Fock terms and momentum-dependent self-energies.

    Authors: We agree that this attribution is essential and that the manuscript should make the consistency explicit. The RHF calculations employ the identical meson-exchange Lagrangian density and the same density-dependent meson-nucleon coupling functions as the RMF models to which they are compared; the only structural difference is the explicit evaluation of the Fock (exchange) terms, which generate the momentum-dependent components of the nucleon self-energies. To remove any ambiguity, we will add a dedicated paragraph (and, if helpful, a short table) in Section II that states the common Lagrangian, lists the shared coupling parameters, and notes that the RMF results are recovered by dropping the exchange contributions while keeping all other ingredients fixed. This revision will allow readers to attribute the reported shifts unambiguously to the momentum dependence arising from the Fock terms. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: standard RHF application yields independent opacity results

full rationale

The paper applies the established relativistic Hartree-Fock formalism with momentum-dependent self-energies to compute charged-current weak rates and opacities, then compares the outputs to existing RMF calculations. No step reduces a derived quantity to a fitted parameter defined from the same observable, nor does any load-bearing premise rest on a self-citation chain whose validity is presupposed. The reported discrepancies emerge as calculational outcomes rather than being enforced by construction or renaming. The derivation chain remains self-contained against external nuclear-physics benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper rests on the standard assumptions of relativistic nuclear many-body theory plus the validity of the Hartree-Fock truncation for momentum-dependent self-energies in the density regime relevant to supernovae.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The relativistic Hartree-Fock approximation with momentum-dependent nucleon self-energies is adequate for computing charged-current weak rates in dense nuclear matter.
    This is the central modeling choice introduced to replace the simpler RMF treatment.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5738 in / 1186 out tokens · 36564 ms · 2026-05-19T22:27:57.133585+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

71 extracted references · 71 canonical work pages · 17 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Vector: ΛV Q = 4 ˜q2µ h − m∗2 2 −m ∗ 2m∗ 4 ˜q2 µ + 2(p∗ 2 ·˜q)2 + (p∗ 2 ·˜q)˜q2 µ i ,(51a) ΛV L =− 4 ˜q2µ h m∗2 2 −m ∗ 2m∗ 4 ˜q2 µ + (p∗ 2 ·˜q)˜q2 µ + 2(p∗ 2 ·˜n)2 i ,(51b) ΛV T+ = 1 2 n 8 −m ∗2 2 + 2m∗ 2m∗ 4 −(p ∗ 2 ·˜q) −Λ V L −Λ V Q o , (51c) ΛV M+ =− 4 ˜q2µ 2(p∗ 2 ·˜q)(p∗ 2 ·˜n) + (p∗ 2 ·˜n)˜q2 µ .(51d) 4 p1 a =p a sinθ a cosϕ a,p 2 a =p a sinθ a sinϕ...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Axial-vector: ΛA Q = 4 ˜q2µ h − m∗2 2 +m ∗ 2m∗ 4 ˜q2 µ + 2(p∗ 2 ·˜q)2 + (p∗ 2 ·˜q)˜q2 µ i ,(52a) ΛA L =− 4 ˜q2µ h m∗2 2 +m ∗ 2m∗ 4 ˜q2 µ + (p∗ 2 ·˜q)˜q2 µ + 2(p∗ 2 ·˜n)2 i ,(52b) ΛA T+ = 1 2 n 8 −m∗2 2 −2m ∗ 2m∗ 4 −(p ∗ 2 ·˜q) −Λ A L −Λ A Q o , (52c) ΛA M+ =− 4 ˜q2µ 2(p∗ 2 ·˜q)(p∗ 2 ·˜n) + (p∗ 2 ·˜n)˜q2 µ .(52d)

    work page

  3. [3]

    Tensor: ΛT L = 1 M2 N n m∗2 2 +m ∗ 2m∗ 4 ˜q2 µ −(p ∗ 2 ·˜q) ˜q2 µ + 2(p∗ 2 ·˜q) + 2(p ∗ 2 ·˜n)2 o ,(53a) ΛT T+ = 1 2 1 M2 N m∗2 2 + 3m∗ 2m∗ 4 ˜q2 µ −3(p ∗ 2 ·˜q)˜q2 µ −4(p ∗ 2 ·˜q)2 −Λ T L .(53b)

    work page

  4. [4]

    Pseudoscalar: ΛP Q = 4 ˜q2 µ M2 N m∗2 2 −m ∗ 2m∗ 4 + (p∗ 2 ·˜q) .(54)

    work page

  5. [5]

    Vector axial-vector: ΛV A T− =−8i(p ∗ 2 ·˜n).(55)

    work page

  6. [6]

    Vector tensor: ΛV T L =−4∆(p ∗ 2 ·˜q) + 4m∗ 2 MN ˜q2 µ ,(56a) ΛV T T+ =−6∆(p ∗ 2 ·˜q) + 6m∗ 2 MN ˜q2 µ − 1 2ΛV T L ,(56b) ΛV T M+ =−2∆(p ∗ 2 ·˜n),(56c) where ∆ = (m ∗ 4 −m ∗ 2)/MN and we note here that the denominator of ∆ containsM N, notM ∗ 2 as given in the denominator in Ref. [24]

    work page

  7. [7]

    Axial-vector tensor: ΛAT T− =−4i ∆ + 2 m∗ 2 MN (p∗ 2 ·˜n).(57)

    work page

  8. [8]

    (36)) is the interchange of the labels 2↔4 in the non-zero com- ponents

    Axial-vector pseudoscalar: ΛAP Q = 8 ∆(p∗ 2 ·˜q)−˜q2 µ m∗ 2 MN ,(58a) ΛAP M+ =−4∆(p ∗ 2 ·˜n).(58b) When considering the process ¯νe +p→e + +n, the only modification required in the hadron tensor (Eq. (36)) is the interchange of the labels 2↔4 in the non-zero com- ponents. Before writing the expression for neutrino absorption rate within the RHF approximat...

    work page

  9. [9]

    (59), considering the allowed range forE 3 ∈[m 3,∞), one finds thatq 0 is constrained by−∞< q 0 < E 1 −m 3

    From Eq. (59), considering the allowed range forE 3 ∈[m 3,∞), one finds thatq 0 is constrained by−∞< q 0 < E 1 −m 3. Moreover, from Eq. (60), taking the extreme values ofµ 13 =±1, the momentum transferqsatisfies|E 1 −p 3|< q < E 1 +p 3. Finally, since the contracted 4-momenta given in Eqs. (47) and (50) within the RHF approximation in- volve all the possi...

    work page

  10. [10]

    the expressions of the lepton and hadron tensors are identical to the ones for the antineutrinos as introduced in Sec. III

    work page

  11. [11]

    replacement of the lepton Pauli blocking, 1− f3(E3)→f 3(E3)

    work page

  12. [12]

    the energy transfer of leptons becomesq 0 =E 1 − E3 →E 1 +E 3

    work page

  13. [13]

    (B8),E 3 → −E3

    replacement in Eq. (B8),E 3 → −E3

    work page

  14. [14]

    the integration limits ofq 0 are fromE 1 +m 3 to∞

    work page

  15. [15]

    ˆMa(q) X i∈A Bi,aa(p, q) + 1 2 ˆPa(q)Daa(q, p) # + 2 Z ∞ 0 dqqf b(Eb)

    since the process considered is described by Fig. 1 but with an arrow forp 3 in the opposite direction, which implies the usage ofG < 3 (p3), it introduces a global minus sign. Since the integration overq 0 is limited from above by E1 −m 3 (only forν e and ¯νe absorptions), the most rel- evant for the behavior of Γ(E 1) is the dependence of dΓ/dq0 below t...

    work page 2023

  16. [16]

    (B11) and (B13), Eq

    = δ(µ−µ 0) p2q |E∗ 2 + ˜q0|.(B13) To ensure thatµ 0 is the correct root ofg(µ), it must be in the range of−1≤µ 0 ≤1, which, after integrating overµ, imposes the new limit Θ(E ∗ 2 −e −) forE ∗ 2, where e− =−β ˜q0 2 + q 2 s β2 − 4m∗2 2 ˜q2µ .(B14) Applying Eqs. (B11) and (B13), Eq. (B4) can be rewritten as I µν = 1 (4π)2 Z dΩ24 Z ∞ 0 dp2p2 2 f2 −f 4 E∗ 2 E∗...

    work page

  17. [17]

    Vector: I V Q = (λ2 +σ − −1)I Q ,(B23) I V L =I L +σ −IQ ,(B24) I V T+ =I T +σ −IQ ,(B25) I V M+ =λI M ,(B26) whereλ=β−1 andσ ± = 1−(m ∗ 2 ±m ∗ 4)2/˜q2 µ

    work page

  18. [18]

    Axial-vector: I A Q = (λ2 +σ + −1)I Q ,(B27) 22 10-5 10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1 100 101 10-3 10-2 10-1 100 RHF RHF* TMA Γ(E1) [m-1] nB/n0 (a)ν e 10-8 10-7 10-6 10-5 10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1 100 Γ(E1) [m-1] nB/n0 (b) ¯νe FIG. 9. Neutrino opacity, at the leading-order hadronic vertex contributions, as a function of the normalized number density, nB, in units of the sat...

    work page

  19. [19]

    (57) and (58) in Ref

    Tensor: I T L = ˜q2 µ 4M2 N σ− −β 2 + 4m∗2 2 ˜q2µ IQ −I L ,(B31) I T T+ = ˜q2 µ 4M2 N σ− −β 2 + 4m∗2 2 ˜q2µ IQ −I T ,(B32) with small differences arising, compared to Eqs. (57) and (58) in Ref. [24] 9

    work page

  20. [20]

    Pseudoscalar: I P Q =− q2 µ M2 N IQ .(B33)

    work page

  21. [21]

    Vector axial-vector: I V A T− =−2iI M .(B34)

    work page

  22. [22]

    I V T T+ = 2 m∗ 2 MN + ∆β IQ ,(B36) I V T M+ =− ∆ 2 IM ,(B37) where ∆ is given below Eq

    Vector tensor: I V T L = 2 m∗ 2 MN + ∆β IQ ,(B35) 9 We find ˜q2 µ instead ofq 2 µ,M 2 N instead ofm 2 2 in the denominator outside the brackets, andm ∗2 2 instead ofm 2 2 in the numera- tor [24]. I V T T+ = 2 m∗ 2 MN + ∆β IQ ,(B36) I V T M+ =− ∆ 2 IM ,(B37) where ∆ is given below Eq. (56c)

    work page

  23. [23]

    Axial-vector tensor: I AT T− =−i 2 m∗ 2 MN + ∆ IM ,(B38) We note that also here for the vector tensor and axial-vector tensor terms, we find small differences compared to the literature 10

    work page

  24. [24]

    (B3), we can calculate the neutrino opacity by expressing it in terms of the integrals overq 0 andq, which are connected toE 3 via Eq

    Axial-vector pseudoscalar: I AP Q =−2 ∆β+ 2 m∗ 2 MN IQ ,(B39) I AP M+ =−∆I M .(B40) From the differential absorption rate, Eq. (B3), we can calculate the neutrino opacity by expressing it in terms of the integrals overq 0 andq, which are connected toE 3 via Eq. (59) and throughµ 13 via Eq. (60), respectively, (cf. Ref. [9]), Γ(E1) = G2 F C2 32π2E2 1 Z E1−...

    work page

  25. [25]

    Hirata, T

    K. Hirata, T. Kajita, M. Koshiba, M. Nakahata, and Y. Oyama, Physical Review Letters58, 1490 (1987)

    work page 1987

  26. [26]

    R. M. Bionta, G. Blewitt, C. B. Bratton, D. Casper, and A. Ciocio, Physical Review Letters58, 1494 (1987)

    work page 1987

  27. [27]

    C. B. Bratton, D. Casper, A. Ciocio, R. Claus, M. Crouch, S. T. Dye, S. Errede, W. Gajewski, M. Gold- haber, T. J. Haines, T. W. Jones, D. Kielczewska, W. R. Kropp, J. G. Learned, J. M. Losecco, J. Matthews, R. Miller, M. Mudan, L. R. Price, F. Reines, J. Schultz, S. Seidel, D. Sinclair, H. W. Sobel, J. L. Stone, L. Su- lak, R. Svoboda, G. Thornton, and J...

    work page 1988

  28. [28]

    E. N. Alexeyev, L. N. Alexeyeva, I. V. Krivosheina, and V. I. Volchenko, Physics Letters B205, 209 (1988)

    work page 1988

  29. [29]

    Aglietta, G

    M. Aglietta, G. Badino, G. Bologna, C. Castagnoli, A. Castellina, V. L. Dadykin, W. Fulgione, P. Galeotti, F. F. Kalchukov, F. F. Khalchukov, V. B. Kortchaguin, V. B. Korchagin, P. V. Kortchaguin, P. V. Korchagin, A. S. Malguin, A. S. Mal’Gin, V. G. Ryassny, V. G. Ryas- nyj, O. G. Ryazhskaya, O. Saavedra, V. P. Talochkin, G. Trinchero, S. Vernetto, G. T. ...

    work page 1987

  30. [30]

    Janka, Long-Term Multidimensional Models of Core- Collapse Supernovae: Progress and Challenges, Ann

    H.-T. Janka, Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Sci- ence75, 425 (2025), arXiv:2502.14836 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2025

  31. [31]

    Fischer, G

    T. Fischer, G. Guo, K. Langanke, G. Mart´ ınez-Pinedo, Y.-Z. Qian, and M.-R. Wu, Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics137, 104107 (2024), arXiv:2308.03962 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2024

  32. [32]

    Tamborra, Neutrinos from explosive transients at the dawn of multi-messenger astronomy, Nature Rev

    I. Tamborra, Nature Reviews Physics7, 285 (2025), arXiv:2412.09699 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2025

  33. [33]

    Neutrino Interactions in Hot and Dense Matter

    S. Reddy, M. Prakash, and J. M. Lattimer, Phys. Rev. D58, 013009 (1998), arXiv:astro-ph/9710115 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  34. [34]

    Charged-current weak interaction processes in hot and dense matter and its impact on the spectra of neutrinos emitted from proto-neutron star cooling

    G. Mart´ ınez-Pinedo, T. Fischer, A. Lohs, and L. Huther, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 251104 (2012), arXiv:1205.2793 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  35. [35]

    L. F. Roberts, S. Reddy, and G. Shen, Phys. Rev. C86, 065803 (2012), arXiv:1205.4066 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  36. [36]

    Protoneutron star evolution and the neutrino driven wind in general relativistic neutrino radiation hydrodynamics simulations

    T. Fischer, S. C. Whitehouse, A. Mezzacappa, F. K. Thielemann, and M. Liebend¨ orfer, Astron. Astrophys. 517, A80 (2010), arXiv:0908.1871 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  37. [37]

    Neutrino Signal of Electron-Capture Supernovae from Core Collapse to Cooling

    L. H¨ udepohl, B. M¨ uller, H. T. Janka, A. Marek, and G. G. Raffelt, Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 251101 (2010), arXiv:0912.0260 [astro-ph.SR]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  38. [38]

    Fischer, G

    T. Fischer, G. Guo, A. A. Dzhioev, G. Mart´ ınez-Pinedo, M.-R. Wu, A. Lohs, and Y.-Z. Qian, Phys. Rev. C101, 025804 (2020), arXiv:1804.10890 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2020

  39. [39]

    G. Guo, G. Mart´ ınez-Pinedo, A. Lohs, and T. Fischer, Phys. Rev. D102, 023037 (2020), arXiv:2006.12051 [hep- ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  40. [40]

    L. F. Roberts, G. Shen, V. Cirigliano, J. A. Pons, S. Reddy, and S. E. Woosley, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 061103 (2012), arXiv:1112.0335 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  41. [41]

    Supernova Neutrinos: Production, Oscillations and Detection

    A. Mirizzi, I. Tamborra, H.-T. Janka, N. Sa- viano, K. Scholberg, R. Bollig, L. H¨ udepohl, and S. Chakraborty, Nuovo Cimento Rivista Serie39, 1 (2016), arXiv:1508.00785 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  42. [42]

    An Exploration of the Equation of State Dependence of Core-Collapse Supernova Explosion Outcomes and Signatures

    A. Rusakov, A. S. Burrows, T. Wang, and D. Var- tanyan, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2602.09025 (2026), arXiv:2602.09025 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  43. [43]

    B. D. Serot and J. D. Walecka,The relativistic nuclear many-body problem, edited by J. W. Negele and E. Vogt, Adv. Nucl. Phys., Vol. 16 (Plenum Press, New York, 1986)

    work page 1986

  44. [44]

    Le Bellac,Thermal field theory(Cambridge university press, 2000)

    M. Le Bellac,Thermal field theory(Cambridge university press, 2000)

    work page 2000

  45. [45]

    R. L. Kobes and G. W. Semenoff, Nuclear Physics B272, 329 (1986)

    work page 1986

  46. [46]

    Navas, C

    S. Navas, C. Amsler, T. Gutsche, C. Hanhart, J. J. Hern´ andez-Rey, C. Louren¸ co, A. Masoni, M. Mikhasenko, R. E. Mitchell, C. Patrignani, C. Schwanda, S. Spanier, G. Venanzoni, C. Z. Yuan, K. Agashe, G. Aielli, B. C. Allanach, J. Alvarez-Mu˜ niz, M. Antonelli, E. C. Aschenauer, D. M. Asner, K. Assam- agan, H. Baer, S. Banerjee, R. M. Barnett, L. Baudis,...

    work page 2024

  47. [47]

    Bouyssy, J.-F

    A. Bouyssy, J.-F. Mathiot, N. Van Giai, and S. Marcos, Phys. Rev. C36, 380 (1987)

    work page 1987

  48. [49]

    L. F. Roberts and S. Reddy, Phys. Rev. C95, 045807 (2017), arXiv:1612.02764 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  49. [50]

    Chin, Ann

    S. Chin, Ann. Phys.108, 301 (1977)

    work page 1977

  50. [51]

    Horowitz and B

    C. Horowitz and B. D. Serot, Nucl. Phys. A399, 529 (1983)

    work page 1983

  51. [52]

    H. Toki, D. Hirata, Y. Sugahara, K. Sumiyoshi, and I. Tanihata, Nucl. Phys. A588, c357 (1995), proceed- ings of the Fifth International Symposium on Physics of Unstable Nuclei

    work page 1995

  52. [53]

    G. A. Lalazissis, J. K¨ onig, and P. Ring, Phys. Rev. C 55, 540 (1997)

    work page 1997

  53. [54]

    Typel and H

    S. Typel and H. H. Wolter, Nucl. Phys. A656, 331 (1999)

    work page 1999

  54. [55]

    Kumar, P

    A. Kumar, P. Thakur, and M. Sinha, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.530, 501 (2024), arXiv:2404.01252 [astro- ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2024

  55. [56]

    Statistical Model for a Complete Supernova Equation of State

    M. Hempel and J. Schaffner-Bielich, Nucl. Phys. A837, 210 (2010), arXiv:0911.4073 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  56. [57]

    Fischer, S

    T. Fischer, S. Typel, G. R¨ opke, N.-U. F. Bastian, and G. Mart´ ınez-Pinedo, Phys. Rev. C102, 055807 (2020), arXiv:2008.13608 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2020

  57. [58]

    Symmetry energy impact in simulations of core-collapse supernovae

    T. Fischer, M. Hempel, I. Sagert, Y. Suwa, and J. Schaffner-Bielich, European Physical Journal A50, 46 (2014), arXiv:1307.6190 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  58. [59]

    New Equations of State in Simulations of Core-Collapse Supernovae

    M. Hempel, T. Fischer, J. Schaffner-Bielich, and M. Liebend¨ orfer, Astrophys. J.748, 70 (2012), arXiv:1108.0848 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  59. [60]

    A. W. Steiner, J. M. Lattimer, and E. F. Brown, Astro- phys. J.765, L5 (2013), arXiv:1205.6871 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  60. [61]

    The state of matter in simulations of core-collapse supernovae -- Reflections and recent developments

    T. Fischer, N.-U. Bastian, D. Blaschke, M. Cierniak, M. Hempel, T. Kl¨ ahn, G. Mart´ ınez-Pinedo, W. G. New- ton, G. R¨ opke, and S. Typel, Publ. Astron. Soc. Austr. 34, e067 (2017), arXiv:1711.07411 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  61. [62]

    Nuclear Matter in Relativistic Mean Field Theory with Isovector Scalar Meson

    S. Kubis and M. Kutschera, Physics Letters B399, 191 (1997), arXiv:astro-ph/9703049 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  62. [63]

    Muon Creation in Supernova Matter Facilitates Neutrino-driven Explosions

    R. Bollig, H.-T. Janka, A. Lohs, G. Mart´ ınez-Pinedo, C. J. Horowitz, and T. Melson, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 242702 (2017), arXiv:1706.04630 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  63. [64]

    J. M. Lattimer and F. Swesty, Nuclear Physics A535, 331 (1991)

    work page 1991

  64. [65]

    S. W. Bruenn, Astrophys. J. Suppl.58, 771 (1985)

    work page 1985

  65. [66]

    Neutrino spectra evolution during proto-neutron star deleptonization

    T. Fischer, G. Mart´ ınez-Pinedo, M. Hempel, and M. Liebend¨ orfer, Phys. Rev. D85, 083003 (2012), arXiv:1112.3842 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  66. [67]

    Matsui and B

    T. Matsui and B. D. Serot, Ann. Phys.144, 107 (1982)

    work page 1982

  67. [68]

    J. D. Bjorken and S. D. Drell,Relativistic quantum me- chanics, edited by L. I. Schiff, International series in pure and applied physics (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1964)

    work page 1964

  68. [69]

    B. Y. Sun, W. H. Long, J. Meng, and U. Lombardo, Phys. Rev. C78, 065805 (2008)

    work page 2008

  69. [70]

    Soutome, M

    K. Soutome, M. Tomoyuki, and S. Koichi, Nucl. Phys. A507, 731 (1990)

    work page 1990

  70. [71]

    S. Yang, B. N. Zhang, and B. Y. Sun, Phys. Rev. C100, 054314 (2019)

    work page 2019

  71. [72]

    S. Yang, X. D. Sun, J. Geng, B. Y. Sun, and W. H. Long, Phys. Rev. C103, 014304 (2021)

    work page 2021