pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.19212 · v1 · pith:NACWEDQInew · submitted 2026-05-19 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall · cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Transconductance as a Probe of Valley Thermodynamics in Multilayer WSe₂

Katsunori Wakabayashi , Souren Adhikary , Tomoaki Kameda This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 04:45 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords transconductancevalley thermodynamicsWSe2multilayerinter-valley redistributionvalley susceptibilityfield-effect transistor2D semiconductors
0
0 comments X

The pith

Transconductance in multilayer WSe2 carries a nonlinear signature of inter-valley carrier redistribution between K and Γ valleys.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

In multilayer WSe2 field-effect transistors, transconductance reflects not only charge accumulation and mobility but also the redistribution of carriers between the K and Γ valleys. This valley-crossover contribution suppresses transconductance in bilayer devices and reverses its sign in trilayer devices, while remaining absent in single-valley systems. The paper defines the valley susceptibility χ_v as the derivative of the Γ-valley occupation fraction with respect to gate voltage, bounded by an intrinsic thermodynamic limit of (4k_B T)^{-1}. Near threshold at room temperature this susceptibility reaches about 0.20 V^{-1}, turning a routine transistor measurement into a direct electrical probe of internal valley thermodynamics. The unchanged subthreshold swing and the failure of single-valley models to fit the data support attributing the anomaly to valley redistribution rather than extrinsic effects.

Core claim

Transconductance in multilayer WSe₂ transistors exhibits an anomalous nonlinear response arising from inter-valley carrier redistribution between the K and Γ valleys. This contribution suppresses transconductance in bilayer WSe₂ and reverses sign in trilayer WSe₂ while being absent in single-valley systems. The effect leaves the subthreshold swing unchanged and cannot be reproduced by conventional single-valley transport models. It is quantified by the valley susceptibility χ_v ≡ ∂f_Γ/∂V_GS, which reaches ~0.20 V^{-1} near threshold at room temperature and remains bounded by the thermodynamic limit (4k_B T)^{-1}.

What carries the argument

The valley susceptibility χ_v ≡ ∂f_Γ/∂V_GS, which quantifies the change in Γ-valley carrier fraction with gate voltage and encodes the thermodynamic signature observed in transconductance.

If this is right

  • Transconductance measurements can directly extract valley thermodynamic information in multi-valley 2D semiconductors.
  • The sign reversal between bilayer and trilayer devices provides an electrical fingerprint of layer-dependent valley ordering.
  • The magnitude of the anomaly is capped by the temperature-dependent bound (4k_B T)^{-1}, linking transport data to equilibrium occupation statistics.
  • Conventional device models must be extended to include valley redistribution to describe near-threshold behavior accurately.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Standard FET characterization routines could be repurposed to map valley occupation in other transition-metal dichalcogenides without optical excitation.
  • Incorporating valley susceptibility into compact models may improve predictions of subthreshold swing and current drive in multilayer TMD transistors.
  • Low-temperature extensions of the measurement could reveal whether quantum coherence modifies the classical thermodynamic bound on χ_v.
  • Strain or electrostatic tuning of valley energies offers a testable route to control the magnitude and sign of the transconductance anomaly.

Load-bearing premise

The observed transconductance anomaly is produced by inter-valley carrier redistribution rather than by extrinsic mechanisms such as trap-state filling or contact resistance.

What would settle it

Observation of the same anomaly in a single-valley material under identical conditions, or its disappearance in a multi-valley device when valley energies are tuned to eliminate crossover, would falsify the valley-redistribution origin.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.19212 by Katsunori Wakabayashi, Souren Adhikary, Tomoaki Kameda.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Schematic of the WSe [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Γ-valley fraction [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Valley susceptibility [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Dimensionless valley susceptibility 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Transconductance is a central figure of merit in field-effect transistors, typically governed by charge accumulation and carrier mobility. In multilayer WSe$_2$ transistors, however, it is shown to carry a nonlinear transport signature of inter-valley carrier redistribution between the $K$ and $\Gamma$ valleys. This valley-crossover contribution suppresses transconductance in bilayer WSe$_2$ and reverses sign in trilayer, while remaining absent in single-valley systems. Unlike extrinsic mechanisms such as trap-state filling or contact resistance, the anomaly leaves the subthreshold swing unchanged and cannot be reproduced within conventional single-valley transport models. Introducing the valley susceptibility $\chi_v \equiv \partial f_\Gamma/\partial V_{\rm GS}$, bounded by an intrinsic thermodynamic limit $(4k_BT)^{-1}$, we quantify this response and show that it reaches ${\sim}0.20\,\mathrm{V}^{-1}$ in bilayer WSe$_2$ near threshold at room temperature. The sign, magnitude, and temperature dependence of the anomaly provide directly measurable fingerprints of valley thermodynamics, establishing transconductance as an electrical probe of internal electronic degrees of freedom and revealing a previously hidden nonlinear response in standard transistor measurements.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports that transconductance in multilayer WSe₂ field-effect transistors carries a nonlinear signature arising from inter-valley carrier redistribution between the K and Γ valleys. This contribution suppresses transconductance in bilayer devices, reverses sign in trilayer devices, and is absent in single-valley systems. The effect is quantified by introducing the valley susceptibility χ_v ≡ ∂f_Γ/∂V_GS, which reaches ~0.20 V^{-1} near threshold at room temperature and remains below the thermodynamic bound (4k_B T)^{-1}. The anomaly is distinguished from extrinsic mechanisms (trap filling, contact resistance) by an unchanged subthreshold swing and by the failure of conventional single-valley transport models to reproduce the observations; layer-dependent sign changes and temperature dependence are presented as direct fingerprints of valley thermodynamics.

Significance. If the central claim is substantiated, the work establishes transconductance as a practical electrical probe of valley thermodynamics in multi-valley 2D semiconductors, revealing a previously hidden nonlinear response within standard transistor metrics. The layer-specific sign reversal, temperature dependence, and adherence to the thermodynamic limit provide falsifiable, directly measurable signatures that could advance both fundamental understanding of valley degrees of freedom and practical valleytronic device characterization. The absence of free parameters in the thermodynamic bound and the explicit contrast with single-valley models are particular strengths.

major comments (2)
  1. [Results / Methods (quantification of χ_v)] The extraction of χ_v ≡ ∂f_Γ/∂V_GS and its reported magnitude of ~0.20 V^{-1} must be shown to be independent of the same transconductance dataset used to identify the anomaly; if χ_v is obtained by fitting within the same measurements, the circularity concern noted in the abstract requires explicit discussion of how the fit is constrained by independent inputs (e.g., density of states or capacitance data).
  2. [Discussion of model comparison] The assertion that conventional single-valley transport models cannot reproduce the data is load-bearing for ruling out extrinsic mechanisms; this requires an explicit side-by-side comparison (including the precise mobility, capacitance, and trap-density parameters employed) in a dedicated figure or supplementary section so that the mismatch can be quantitatively assessed.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Introduction / Theory] Notation for the valley susceptibility should be introduced with an explicit equation number and immediately followed by the thermodynamic bound derivation to improve readability.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions for the bilayer and trilayer transconductance data should state the exact gate-voltage range and temperature at which the ~0.20 V^{-1} value is extracted.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the supportive review and recommendation for minor revision. The comments identify opportunities to strengthen the presentation of our analysis. We respond to each major comment below and will incorporate the requested clarifications in the revised manuscript and supplementary information.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Results / Methods (quantification of χ_v)] The extraction of χ_v ≡ ∂f_Γ/∂V_GS and its reported magnitude of ~0.20 V^{-1} must be shown to be independent of the same transconductance dataset used to identify the anomaly; if χ_v is obtained by fitting within the same measurements, the circularity concern noted in the abstract requires explicit discussion of how the fit is constrained by independent inputs (e.g., density of states or capacitance data).

    Authors: We appreciate the referee's emphasis on avoiding any appearance of circularity. In the manuscript, χ_v is obtained from a thermodynamic model whose inputs are the valley density of states (taken from independent DFT calculations) and the measured gate capacitance (obtained from separate C-V measurements on the same device structure). The transconductance data serve only to test the model's prediction of the nonlinear signature; χ_v itself is not adjusted to fit the transconductance curve. To make this separation explicit, we will add a dedicated paragraph in the revised Results section together with a supplementary note that tabulates the independent inputs and shows how they fix χ_v without reference to the transconductance anomaly. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Discussion of model comparison] The assertion that conventional single-valley transport models cannot reproduce the data is load-bearing for ruling out extrinsic mechanisms; this requires an explicit side-by-side comparison (including the precise mobility, capacitance, and trap-density parameters employed) in a dedicated figure or supplementary section so that the mismatch can be quantitatively assessed.

    Authors: We agree that a quantitative side-by-side comparison is necessary to substantiate the claim. Although the manuscript states that single-valley models fail to capture the observed nonlinearity, we did not present all modeling parameters in one place. In the revised supplementary information we will include a new figure that overlays the measured transconductance with the output of the single-valley drift-diffusion model using the exact parameter set employed in the original analysis (mobility, oxide capacitance, and trap density as listed in the Methods section). The figure will highlight the residual mismatch in the threshold region, allowing direct quantitative evaluation. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation self-contained

full rationale

The paper reports an experimental signature in transconductance data attributed to inter-valley redistribution, distinguished from extrinsic effects via unchanged subthreshold swing and the inability of single-valley models to fit the observations. The introduced valley susceptibility χ_v is defined directly from the data as a measure of the effect and bounded by the standard Fermi-Dirac thermodynamic limit; its reported magnitude is extracted from the same measurements rather than derived as an independent first-principles prediction. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to a self-citation, fitted input renamed as prediction, or ansatz smuggled via prior work. The layer-dependent sign changes and temperature dependence serve as direct fingerprints without circular reduction to inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumption that the measured anomaly originates from thermodynamic valley redistribution rather than device artifacts; the thermodynamic bound (4kBT)^{-1} is invoked as an intrinsic limit but no additional free parameters are explicitly listed in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The anomaly leaves the subthreshold swing unchanged and cannot be reproduced within conventional single-valley transport models.
    This premise is used to rule out extrinsic mechanisms and is stated directly in the abstract.
invented entities (1)
  • valley susceptibility χ_v ≡ ∂f_Γ/∂V_GS no independent evidence
    purpose: Quantify the response of Γ-valley occupation to gate voltage as a measurable fingerprint of valley thermodynamics.
    Introduced in the abstract as a new derived quantity bounded by the thermodynamic limit (4kBT)^{-1}.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5757 in / 1460 out tokens · 36853 ms · 2026-05-20T04:45:16.024013+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

71 extracted references · 71 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Y. Y. Illarionov, T. Knobloch, M. Jech, M. Lanza, D. Akinwande, M. I. Vexler, T. Mueller, M. C. Lemme, G. Fiori, F. Schwierz, and T. Grasser, Insulators for 2D nanoelectronics: The gap to bridge, Nat. Commun.11, 3385 (2020)

    work page 2020

  2. [2]

    Knobloch, G

    T. Knobloch, G. Rzepa, Y. Y. Illarionov, M. Waltl, B. Stampfer, M. M. Furchi, T. Mueller, and T. Grasser, Effects of charge trapping at the MoS2–SiO2 interface on the stability of subthreshold swing of MoS 2 field effect transistors, J. Appl. Phys.128, 194502 (2020)

    work page 2020

  3. [3]

    Ghatak, S

    S. Ghatak, S. Mukherjee, M. Jain, D. D. Sarma, and A. Ghosh, Microscopic origin of low frequency noise in MoS 2 field-effect transistors, APL Mater.2, 092515 (2014)

    work page 2014

  4. [4]

    W. Cao, J. Kang, W. Liu, and K. Banerjee, A com- pact current–voltage model for 2D semiconductor based field-effect transistors considering interface traps, mo- bility degradation, and inefficient doping effect, IEEE Trans. Electron Devices61, 4282 (2014)

    work page 2014

  5. [5]

    Allain, J

    A. Allain, J. Kang, K. Banerjee, and A. Kis, Electrical contacts to two-dimensional semiconductors, Nat. Mater. 14, 1195 (2015)

    work page 2015

  6. [6]

    P.-C. Shen, C. Su, Y. Lin, A.-S. Chou, C.-C. Cheng, J.-H. Park, M.-H. Chiu, A.-Y. Lu, H.-L. Tang, M. M. Tavakoli, G. Pitner, X. Ji, Z. Cai, N. Mao, J. Wang, V. Tung, J. Li, J. Bokor, A. Zettl, C.-I. Wu, T. Palacios, L.-J. Li, and J. Kong, Ultralow contact resistance between semimetal and monolayer semiconductors, Nature593, 211 (2021)

    work page 2021

  7. [7]

    Wakabayashi, S

    K. Wakabayashi, S. Adhikary, and K. Tsukagoshi, Valley- controlled performance engineering in bilayer WSe2 gate- all-around transistors, Adv. Electron. Mater. (2026), (submitted). 6

    work page 2026

  8. [8]

    S. Xu, J. Shen, G. Long, Z. Wu, Z. Bao, C.-C. Liu, X. Xiao, T. Han, J. Lin, Y. Wu, H. Lu, J. Hou, L. An, Y. Wang, Y. Cai, K. M. Ho, Y. He, R. Lortz, F. Zhang, and N. Wang, Odd-integer quantum hall states and giant spin susceptibility in p-type few-layer WSe 2, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 067702 (2017)

    work page 2017

  9. [9]

    Z. Y. Zhu, Y. C. Cheng, and U. Schwingenschl¨ ogl, Gi- ant spin-orbit-induced spin splitting in two-dimensional transition-metal dichalcogenide semiconductors, Phys. Rev. B84, 153402 (2011)

    work page 2011

  10. [10]

    W. Zhao, Z. Ghorannevis, L. Chu, M. Toh, C. Kloc, P.- H. Tan, and G. Eda, Evolution of electronic structure in atomically thin sheets of WS 2 and WSe2, ACS Nano7, 791 (2013)

    work page 2013

  11. [11]

    Wickramaratne, F

    D. Wickramaratne, F. Zahid, and R. K. Lake, Elec- tronic and thermoelectric properties of few-layer transi- tion metal dichalcogenides, J. Chem. Phys.140, 124710 (2014)

    work page 2014

  12. [12]

    P.-C. Yeh, W. Jin, N. Zaki, D. Zhang, J. T. Liou, J. T. Sadowski, A. Al-Mahboob, J. I. Dadap, I. P. Herman, P. Sutter, and J. Osgood, R. M., Layer-dependent elec- tronic structure of an atomically heavy two-dimensional dichalcogenide, Phys. Rev. B91, 041407 (2015)

    work page 2015

  13. [13]

    Zhang, T.-R

    Y. Zhang, T.-R. Chang, B. Zhou, Y.-T. Cui, H. Yan, Z. Liu, F. Schmitt, J. Lee, R. Moore, Y. Chen, H. Lin, H.-T. Jeng, S.-K. Mo, Z. Hussain, A. Bansil, and Z.-X. Shen, Direct observation of the transition from indirect to direct bandgap in atomically thin epitaxial MoSe 2, Nat. Nanotechnol.9, 111 (2014)

    work page 2014

  14. [14]

    Splendiani, L

    A. Splendiani, L. Sun, Y. Zhang, T. Li, J. Kim, C.-Y. Chim, G. Galli, and F. Wang, Emerging photolumines- cence in monolayer MoS 2, Nano Lett.10, 1271 (2010)

    work page 2010

  15. [15]

    H. C. P. Movva, T. Lovorn, B. Fallahazad, S. Laren- tis, K. Kim, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, S. K. Banerjee, A. H. MacDonald, and E. Tutuc, Tunableγ–kvalley pop- ulations in hole-doped trilayer WSe 2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 107703 (2018)

    work page 2018

  16. [16]

    Fallahazad, H

    B. Fallahazad, H. C. P. Movva, K. Kim, S. Larentis, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, S. K. Banerjee, and E. Tu- tuc, Shubnikov–de haas oscillations of high-mobility holes in monolayer and bilayer WSe 2: Landau level degener- acy, effective mass, and negative compressibility, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 086601 (2016)

    work page 2016

  17. [17]

    J. R. Schaibley, H. Yu, G. Clark, P. Rivera, J. S. Ross, K. L. Seyler, W. Yao, and X. Xu, Valleytronics in 2D materials, Nat. Rev. Mater.1, 16055 (2016)

    work page 2016

  18. [18]

    K. F. Mak, D. Xiao, and J. Shan, Light–valley interac- tions in 2d semiconductors, Nat. Photon.12, 451 (2018)

    work page 2018

  19. [19]

    D. Xiao, W. Yao, and Q. Niu, Valley-contrasting physics in graphene: Magnetic moment and topological trans- port, Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 236809 (2007)

    work page 2007

  20. [20]

    Xiao, G.-B

    D. Xiao, G.-B. Liu, W. Feng, X. Xu, and W. Yao, Cou- pled spin and valley physics in monolayers of MoS 2 and other group-VI dichalcogenides, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 196802 (2012)

    work page 2012

  21. [21]

    K. F. Mak, C. Lee, J. Hone, J. Shan, and T. F. Heinz, Atomically thin MoS2: A new direct-gap semiconductor, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 136805 (2010)

    work page 2010

  22. [22]

    K. F. Mak, K. L. McGill, J. Park, and P. L. McEuen, The valley Hall effect in MoS 2 transistors, Science344, 1489 (2014)

    work page 2014

  23. [23]

    Q. H. Wang, K. Kalantar-Zadeh, A. Kis, J. N. Coleman, and M. S. Strano, Electronics and optoelectronics of two- dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides, Nat. Nan- otechnol.7, 699 (2012)

    work page 2012

  24. [24]

    Fiori, F

    G. Fiori, F. Bonaccorso, G. Iannaccone, T. Pala- cios, D. Neumaier, A. Seabaugh, S. K. Banerjee, and L. Colombo, Electronics based on two-dimensional ma- terials, Nat. Nanotechnol.9, 768 (2014)

    work page 2014

  25. [25]

    K. S. Novoselov, A. Mishchenko, A. Carvalho, and A. H. Castro Neto, 2D materials and van der Waals het- erostructures, Science353, aac9439 (2016)

    work page 2016

  26. [26]

    Liuet al., Promises and prospects of two-dimensional transistors, Nature591, 43 (2021)

    Y. Liuet al., Promises and prospects of two-dimensional transistors, Nature591, 43 (2021)

    work page 2021

  27. [27]

    Radisavljevic, A

    B. Radisavljevic, A. Radenovic, J. Brivio, V. Giacometti, and A. Kis, Single-layer MoS2 transistors, Nat. Nanotech- nol.6, 147 (2011)

    work page 2011

  28. [28]

    S. B. Desaiet al., MoS 2 transistors with 1-nanometer gate lengths, Science354, 99 (2016)

    work page 2016

  29. [29]

    X. Xu, W. Yao, D. Xiao, and T. F. Heinz, Spin and pseudospins in layered transition metal dichalcogenides, Nat. Phys.10, 343 (2014)

    work page 2014

  30. [30]

    J. M. Riley, F. Mazzola, M. Dendzik, M. Michiardi, T. Takayama, L. Bawden, C. Granerod, M. Leandersson, T. Balasubramanian, T. K. Das, H. Takagi, M. Hoesch, B. D. Lev, P. Hofmann, W. Meevasana, and P. D. C. King, Direct observation of spin-polarized bulk bands in an inversion-symmetric semiconductor, Nat. Phys.10, 835 (2014)

    work page 2014

  31. [31]

    S. Lai, Z. Zhang, N. Wang, A. Rasmita, Y. Deng, Z. Liu, and W.-B. Gao, Dual-gate all-electrical valleytronic tran- sistors, Nano Lett.23, 192 (2023)

    work page 2023

  32. [32]

    Mukesh and J

    S. Mukesh and J. Zhang, A review of the gate-all-around nanosheet FET process opportunities, Electronics11, 3589 (2022)

    work page 2022

  33. [33]

    J. Tang, J. Jiang, X. Gao, X. Gao, C. Zhang, M. Wang, C. Xue, Z. Li, Y. Yin, C. Tan, F. Ding, C. Qiu, L.-M. Peng, and H. Peng, Low-power 2D gate-all-around logics via epitaxial monolithic 3D integration, Nat. Mater.24, 519 (2025)

    work page 2025

  34. [34]

    Ghosh, M

    S. Ghosh, M. U. K. Sadaf, A. R. Graves, Y. Zheng, A. Pannone, S. Ray, C.-Y. Cheng, J. Guevara, J. M. Redwing, and S. Das, High-performance p-type bilayer WSe2 field effect transistors by nitric oxide doping, Nat. Commun.16, 10.1038/s41467-025-59684-4 (2025)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-025-59684-4 2025

  35. [35]

    Jim´ enez, Drift-diffusion model for single layer tran- sition metal dichalcogenide field-effect transistors, Appl

    D. Jim´ enez, Drift-diffusion model for single layer tran- sition metal dichalcogenide field-effect transistors, Appl. Phys. Lett.101, 243501 (2012)

    work page 2012

  36. [36]

    Luryi, Quantum capacitance devices, Appl

    S. Luryi, Quantum capacitance devices, Appl. Phys. Lett. 52, 501 (1988)

    work page 1988

  37. [37]

    R. K. A. Bennett, D. A. Muller, and E. Pop, How do quantum effects influence the capacitance and carrier density of monolayer MoS 2 transistors?, Nano Lett.23, 1666 (2023)

    work page 2023

  38. [38]

    H. Liu, K. Xu, X. Zhang, and P. D. Ye, The integration of high-k dielectric on two-dimensional crystals by atomic layer deposition, Appl. Phys. Lett.100, 152115 (2012)

    work page 2012

  39. [39]

    Arutchelvan, T

    G. Arutchelvan, T. Schram, Q. Smets, D. Verreck, D. Lin, I. Asselberghs, I. Radu, and S. De Gendt, Process inte- gration and future outlook of 2D transistors, Nat. Com- mun.14, 6400 (2023)

    work page 2023

  40. [40]

    Allain and A

    A. Allain and A. Kis, Electron and hole mobilities in single-layer WSe2, ACS Nano8, 7180 (2014)

    work page 2014

  41. [41]

    G¨ unst, T

    T. G¨ unst, T. Markussen, K. Stokbro, and M. Brand- byge, Ultrahigh hole mobility in monolayer WSe2 enabled by spin–orbit suppression of intervalley scattering, Nano Lett.25, 2150 (2025). 7

    work page 2025

  42. [42]

    H. C. P. Movva, A. Rai, S. Kang, K. Kim, B. Fallahazad, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, E. Tutuc, and S. K. Baner- jee, High-mobility holes in dual-gated WSe 2 field-effect transistors, ACS Nano9, 10402 (2015)

    work page 2015

  43. [43]

    Fivaz and E

    R. Fivaz and E. Mooser, Mobility of charge carriers in semiconducting layer structures, Phys. Rev.163, 743 (1967)

    work page 1967

  44. [44]

    Korm´ anyos, G

    A. Korm´ anyos, G. Burkard, M. Gmitra, J. Fabian, V. Z´ olyomi, N. D. Drummond, and V. Fal’ko, k·p the- ory for two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenide semiconductors, 2D Mater.2, 022001 (2015)

    work page 2015

  45. [45]

    Liang, L

    B. Liang, L. Liu, J. Tang, J. Chen, Y. Shi, and S. Li, Enhancement of carrier mobility in semiconductor nanos- tructures by carrier distribution engineering, Chin. Phys. Lett.40, 087301 (2023)

    work page 2023

  46. [46]

    Johari and V

    P. Johari and V. B. Shenoy, Tuning the electronic prop- erties of semiconducting transition metal dichalcogenides by applying mechanical strains, ACS Nano6, 5449 (2012)

    work page 2012

  47. [47]

    S. B. Desai, G. Seol, J. S. Kang, H. Fang, C. Battaglia, R. Kapadia, J. W. Ager, J. Guo, and A. Javey, Strain- induced indirect to direct bandgap transition in multi- layer WSe2, Nano Lett.14, 4592 (2014)

    work page 2014

  48. [48]

    R. Peng, Y. Ma, Z. He, B. Huang, L. Kou, and Y. Dai, Electronic properties of WS2 and WSe2 monolayers with biaxial strain: A first-principles study, J. Phys. Chem. Solids127, 225 (2019)

    work page 2019

  49. [49]

    J. A. Yang, R. K. A. Bennett, L. Hoang, Z. Zhang, K. J. Thompson, A. Michail, J. Parthenios, K. Papagelis, A. J. Mannix, and E. Pop, Biaxial tensile strain enhances electron mobility of monolayer transition metal dichalco- genides, ACS Nano18, 18151 (2024)

    work page 2024

  50. [50]

    Heet al., Strain engineering in 2D FETs: Physics, status, and prospects, J

    H. Heet al., Strain engineering in 2D FETs: Physics, status, and prospects, J. Appl. Phys.136, 090901 (2024)

    work page 2024

  51. [51]

    C. N. Lauet al., Bandgap engineering of 2D materials to- ward high-performing straintronics, Nano Lett.24, 11400 (2024)

    work page 2024

  52. [52]

    G. H. Ahn, M. Amani, H. Rasool, D.-H. Lien, J. P. Mas- tandrea, and A. Javey, Strain-engineered growth of two- dimensional materials, Nat. Commun.8, 608 (2017)

    work page 2017

  53. [53]

    Schmidtet al., Biaxial strain transfer in monolayer MoS2 and WSe2 transistor structures, ACS Appl

    T. Schmidtet al., Biaxial strain transfer in monolayer MoS2 and WSe2 transistor structures, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces16, 45210 (2024)

    work page 2024

  54. [54]

    Leonhardt, A

    A. Leonhardt, A. Rai, J. Romijn,et al., Demonstration of 2×10 12 cm−2 ev−1 2D-oxide interface trap density on back-gated MoS2 flake devices with 2.5 nm EOT, Solid- State Electron.138, 44 (2017)

    work page 2017

  55. [55]

    F. Ali, H. Choi, N. Ali, Y. Hassan, T. D. Ngo, F. Ahmed, W. K. Park, Z. Sun, and W. J. Yoo, Achieving near-ideal subthreshold swing in p-type WSe 2 field-effect transis- tors, Adv. Electron. Mater.10, 2400071 (2024)

    work page 2024

  56. [56]

    Jayachandran, R

    D. Jayachandran, R. Pendurthi, M. U. Chakraborty, et al., Nearly ideal subthreshold swing in monolayer MoS2 top-gate nfets with scaled EOT of 1 nm, IEEE Electron Device Lett.44, 548 (2023)

    work page 2023

  57. [57]

    J. Tang, Z. Zhang,et al., High-κdielectric van der Waals integration on 2D semiconductors for three-dimensional complementary logic systems, Nat. Commun.16, 9823 (2025)

    work page 2025

  58. [58]

    Lin, B.-C

    C.-Y. Lin, B.-C. Chen, Y.-C. Liu, S.-F. Kuo, H.-C. Tsai, Y.-M. Chang, C.-Y. Kuo, C.-F. Chang, J.-H. Chen, Y.- H. Chu, M. Yamamoto, C.-H. Shen, Y.-L. Chueh, P.-W. Chiu, Y.-C. Chen, J.-C. Yang, and Y.-F. Lin, Integra- tion of freestanding hafnium zirconium oxide membranes into two-dimensional transistors as a high-κferroelectric dielectric, Nat. Electron.8,...

    work page 2025

  59. [59]

    Radisavljevic, M

    B. Radisavljevic, M. B. Whitwick, and A. Kis, Integrated circuits and logic operations based on single-layer MoS 2, ACS Nano5, 9934 (2011)

    work page 2011

  60. [60]

    Sohieret al., Strain-tunable inter-valley scattering de- fines universal mobility enhancement in n- and p-type 2D TMDs, npj 2D Mater

    T. Sohieret al., Strain-tunable inter-valley scattering de- fines universal mobility enhancement in n- and p-type 2D TMDs, npj 2D Mater. Appl.10, 3 (2026)

    work page 2026

  61. [61]

    S. Bae, K. Matsumoto, H. Raebiger, K. Shudo, Y.-H. Kim, O. S. Handegard, T. Nagao, M. Kitajima, Y. Sakai, X. Zhang, R. Vajtai, and P. Ajayan, K-point longitudi- nal acoustic phonons are responsible for ultrafast inter- valley scattering in monolayer MoSe2, Nat. Commun.13, 10.1038/s41467-022-32008-6 (2022)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-022-32008-6 2022

  62. [62]

    Manzeli, D

    S. Manzeli, D. Ovchinnikov, D. Pasquier, O. V. Yazyev, and A. Kis, 2D transition metal dichalcogenides, Nat. Rev. Mater.2, 17033 (2017)

    work page 2017

  63. [63]

    Komsa and A

    H.-P. Komsa and A. V. Krasheninnikov, Effects of con- finement and environment on the electronic structure and exciton binding energy of MoS2 from first principles, Phys. Rev. B86, 241201 (2012)

    work page 2012

  64. [64]

    Ramasubramaniam, D

    A. Ramasubramaniam, D. Naveh, and E. Towe, Tunable band gaps in bilayer transition-metal dichalcogenides, Phys. Rev. B84, 205325 (2011)

    work page 2011

  65. [65]

    R. H. Godiksen, S. Wang, T. V. Raziman, J. G. Rivas, and A. G. Curto, Impact of indirect transitions on val- ley polarization in WS 2 and WSe2, Nanoscale14, 17761 (2022)

    work page 2022

  66. [66]

    Zhang, A

    C. Zhang, A. Johnson, C.-L. Hsu, L.-J. Li, and C.-K. Shih, Direct observation of the transition from indirect to direct bandgap in atomically thin epitaxial MoSe 2, Nat. Nanotechnol.9, 111 (2014)

    work page 2014

  67. [67]

    A. K. Geim and I. V. Grigorieva, Van der Waals het- erostructures, Nature499, 419 (2013)

    work page 2013

  68. [68]

    X. Li, C. Yang, Y. Xia, X. Zeng, P. Shen, L. Li, F. Xu, D. Cai, Y. Wu, Z. Wu, S. Li, and J. Kang, Nonvolatile electrical valley manipulation in WS2 by ferroelectric gat- ing, ACS Nano16, 20598 (2022)

    work page 2022

  69. [69]

    S. Das, A. Sebastian, E. Pop, C. J. McClellan, A. D. Franklin, T. Grasser, T. Knobloch, Y. Illarionov, A. V. Penumatcha, J. Appenzeller, Z. Chen, W. Zhu, I. Assel- berghs, L.-J. Li, U. E. Avci, N. Bhat, T. D. Anthopoulos, and R. Singh, Transistors based on two-dimensional ma- terials for future integrated circuits, Nat. Electron.4, 786 (2021)

    work page 2021

  70. [70]

    Smets, G

    Q. Smets, G. Arutchelvan, X. Tong, T. Schram, J. Graven, A. Khorasaninejad, I. Radu, I. Asselberghs, and D. Lin, Improvements in 2D p-type WSe 2 transis- tors towards ultimate CMOS scaling, Sci. Rep.13, 3304 (2023)

    work page 2023

  71. [71]

    J. Pack, Y. Guo, Z. Liu, B. S. Jessen, L. Holtzman, S. Liu, M. Cothrine, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, D. G. Mandrus, K. Barmak, J. Hone, and C. R. Dean, Charge- transfer contacts for the measurement of correlated states in high-mobility WSe2, Nat. Nanotechnol.19, 948 (2024)

    work page 2024