Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 1 minor 64 references

Unsupervised learning identifies nondispersive wave packets in driven helium without prior labels.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review

2026-06-29 22:03 UTC pith:CZS2XUCG

load-bearing objection The paper shows a CNN embedding plus clustering recovers known NDWP regimes in driven helium from Floquet states without labels, but supplies no quantitative metrics or robustness checks. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2605.25324 v1 pith:CZS2XUCG submitted 2026-05-25 quant-ph

Unsupervised learning for the systematic identification of nondispersive wave packets in driven helium

Juan M. Scarpetta , Gustavo A. Parra , Alejandro Gonz\'alez-Melan , Javier Madro\~nero This is my paper
classification quant-ph
keywords unsupervised learningnondispersive wave packetsdriven heliumFloquet statesconvolutional neural networkquantum clustering
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents an unsupervised learning approach using a convolutional neural network to embed quantum states of driven helium. These states are represented as probability distributions from a Floquet-based computation. Clustering the embeddings reveals groups that correspond to known physical regimes like nondispersive wave packets and frozen planet states. The method works without any labeled examples, showing the representation learns meaningful physical distinctions. This matters because it automates what usually requires extensive manual analysis of phase space and parameters.

Core claim

Using a convolutional neural network on probability distributions of Floquet states, the approach constructs a low-dimensional embedding where clustering identifies distinct classes of quantum states, including nondispersive wave packets, which are confirmed through geometric analysis, physical parameters, and time evolution.

What carries the argument

Convolutional neural network embedding of configuration and phase space probability distributions of Floquet states, followed by clustering.

Load-bearing premise

The clusters found in the embedding space represent physically distinct classes of quantum states.

What would settle it

Observing that states from a single cluster exhibit dispersive behavior in time evolution or that known nondispersive wave packet parameters do not cluster together would falsify the claim.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces an unsupervised learning pipeline to identify nondispersive wave packets (NDWPs) in driven helium. Floquet states are represented as probability distributions in configuration and phase space and embedded via a convolutional neural network; clustering in the embedding space is followed by post-hoc geometric, parameter, and time-evolution analysis to label clusters as frozen-planet states or NDWPs. The central claim is that this recovers known NDWP regimes without prior labeling, showing that the learned representation captures physically meaningful structures systematically.

Significance. If the embedding and clustering prove robust, the work could automate exploration of complex driven quantum systems and reduce reliance on manual phase-space analysis. The combination of standard representation learning with explicit physical validation is a constructive approach for quantum datasets.

major comments (2)
  1. [Results] Results section: the claim that the method 'successfully recovers known NDWP regimes' is asserted without quantitative metrics (e.g., cluster purity, adjusted Rand index against known labels, silhouette scores, or sensitivity to embedding dimension). This absence directly weakens the assertion that the approach is systematic and automated.
  2. [Methods] Methods and Results: the manuscript provides no error analysis, data-processing details (normalization of probability distributions, handling of grid resolution), or ablation on CNN hyperparameters and clustering choices. These are load-bearing for reproducibility and for confirming that identified clusters are not artifacts of post-hoc selection.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Figures] Figure captions should explicitly state the embedding dimension and clustering algorithm used for each panel.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments. We address each major point below and will revise the manuscript accordingly to strengthen the quantitative support and reproducibility.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Results] Results section: the claim that the method 'successfully recovers known NDWP regimes' is asserted without quantitative metrics (e.g., cluster purity, adjusted Rand index against known labels, silhouette scores, or sensitivity to embedding dimension). This absence directly weakens the assertion that the approach is systematic and automated.

    Authors: We agree that the current presentation would benefit from explicit quantitative metrics. Because the pipeline is unsupervised, adjusted Rand index against full ground-truth labels is not applicable; the validation relies on post-hoc physical identification of known regimes. We will add silhouette scores to assess cluster separation and a sensitivity analysis with respect to embedding dimension in a revised Results section. These additions will provide quantitative backing for the systematic character of the recovery. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Methods] Methods and Results: the manuscript provides no error analysis, data-processing details (normalization of probability distributions, handling of grid resolution), or ablation on CNN hyperparameters and clustering choices. These are load-bearing for reproducibility and for confirming that identified clusters are not artifacts of post-hoc selection.

    Authors: We concur that these details are required for reproducibility. The revised Methods section will specify the normalization applied to the probability distributions, the treatment of grid resolution, any convergence/error analysis performed on the Floquet states, and ablations on CNN hyperparameters (layer count, kernel sizes) together with clustering parameters (algorithm choice, number of clusters). These expansions will allow readers to assess whether the clusters arise from the data structure rather than post-hoc choices. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper computes Floquet states from first principles, feeds probability distributions into a standard CNN embedding, performs unsupervised clustering, and validates clusters post-hoc against independently known NDWP regimes via geometric and time-evolution analysis. No equation or claim reduces by construction to a fitted parameter, self-definition, or self-citation chain; the recovery of known regimes is an external benchmark rather than an internal tautology.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Review performed on abstract only; full details of network architecture, clustering algorithm, and validation criteria unavailable. Free parameters and axioms inferred at high level from described workflow.

free parameters (1)
  • CNN embedding dimension and clustering hyperparameters
    Chosen to produce separable clusters but not specified in abstract; typical in unsupervised ML pipelines.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Floquet theory provides an accurate time-periodic description of the driven helium states
    Invoked to generate the input probability distributions.
  • domain assumption Probability distributions in configuration and phase space are sufficient input features for physically meaningful clustering
    Central to feeding data into the CNN.

reviewed 2026-06-29 · how reviews work

0 comments
read the original abstract

Nondispersive wave packets in driven helium are long-lived quantum states that follow classical resonant orbits without spreading. Their identification typically requires detailed analysis of phase-space structures and extensive exploration of parameter regimes. In this work, we introduce an unsupervised learning approach to automate the identification of physically relevant states in the driven helium atom. Using a Floquet-based description, quantum states are computed and represented as probability distributions in configuration and phase space, which serve as input to a convolutional neural network that constructs a low-dimensional embedding of the data. Clustering in the embedding space reveals distinct classes of quantum states. By combining geometric analysis, physical parameter inspection, and time-evolution studies, we identify clusters corresponding to frozen planet states and nondispersive wave packets. The method successfully recovers known NDWP regimes without prior labeling, demonstrating that the learned representation captures physically meaningful structures in a systematic and automated manner. These results establish unsupervised representation learning as an effective tool for the systematic analysis of complex quantum datasets.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.25324 by Alejandro Gonz\'alez-Melan, Gustavo A. Parra, Javier Madro\~nero, Juan M. Scarpetta.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Husimi distributions of the ground (b), first [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Husimi distributions of a nondispersive wave [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Schematic representation of the generated [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Schematic of the CNN architecture mapping [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Process of minimizing the cost function as a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Embedding visualization for a mini-batch of 256 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: Five-dimensional state clustering (first two [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: Phase space clustering comparison: (Top) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: Cluster visualization: The top row shows the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10: Cluster visualization of identified non-dispersive wave packets. (Top) Configuration space representation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11: Classical phase space of the driven frozen planet [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12: Evolution of the real (left) and imaginary part [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_12.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 11 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Unsupervised learning for the systematic identification of nondispersive wave packets in driven helium

    and exhibit long lifetimes [4, 13]. These states are characterized by the rapid oscillations of the inner electron, while the outer electron remains nearly frozen around a certain equilibrium position. For all these reasons, FPS are of particular interest as they can be controlled using external fields [15]. When the FPS is periodically driven, it exhibit...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  2. [2]

    V. N. Ostrovsky and N. V. Prudov, Three-body coulomb problem in the dipole approximation: p0 and d0 states, J. Phys. B. 30, 151 (1997)

    1997

  3. [3]

    Piraux, J

    B. Piraux, J. Bauer, S. Laulan, and H. Bachau, Probing electron-electron correlation with attosecond pulses, Eur. Phys. J. D. 26, 7 (2003)

    2003

  4. [4]

    A. J. Lichtenberg and M. A. Lieberman, Regular and stochastic motion (Springer-Verlag New York, 1983)

    1983

  5. [5]

    Schlagheck and A

    P. Schlagheck and A. Buchleitner, Stable classical configurations in strongly driven helium, Physica D 131, 110 (1999)

    1999

  6. [6]

    Richter and D

    K. Richter and D. Wintgen, Stable planetary atom configurations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 1965 (1990)

    1965

  7. [7]

    Wintgen, K

    D. Wintgen, K. Richter, and G. Tanner, The semiclassical helium atom, Chaos 2, 19 (1992)

    1992

  8. [8]

    Madro˜ nero and A

    J. Madro˜ nero and A. Buchleitner, Ab initio quantum approach to planar helium under periodic driving, Phys. Rev. A 77, 053402 (2008)

    2008

  9. [9]

    G. J. M. Pab´ on, Spectral properties of planar helium under periodic driving, Ph.D. thesis (2004)

    2004

  10. [10]

    Eiglsperger, B

    J. Eiglsperger, B. Piraux, and J. Madro˜ nero, Spectral representation of the three-body coulomb problem: Perspectives for highly doubly excited states of helium, Phys. Rev. A 80, 022511 (2009)

    2009

  11. [11]

    V. N. Ostrovsky and N. V. Prudov, Planetary atom states: adiabatic invariant theory, J. Phys. B. 28, 4435 (1995)

    1995

  12. [12]

    Richter and D

    K. Richter and D. Wintgen, Intra-shell states of doubly excited atoms: diagonalization within a basis of symmetrically excited electrons, J. Phys. B. 26, 3719 (1993)

    1993

  13. [13]

    Gonz´ alez-Melan and J

    A. Gonz´ alez-Melan and J. Madro˜ nero, Nondispersive wave packets in planar helium, Phys. Rev. A101, 013414 (2020)

    2020

  14. [14]

    Schlagheck and A

    P. Schlagheck and A. Buchleitner, Nondispersive two-electron wave packets in the collinear driven helium atom, Europhysics Letters 46, 24 (1999)

    1999

  15. [15]

    Miheliˇ c and M

    A. Miheliˇ c and M. v. ˇZitnik, Ab Initio calculation of photoionization and inelastic photon scattering spectra of he below the n = 2 threshold in a dc electric field, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 243002 (2007)

    2007

  16. [16]

    J. F. Le´ on Ocampo,Static electric field effects on frozen planet states of helium, Msc. thesis, Universidad del Valle (2021)

    2021

  17. [17]

    Gonz´ alez Melan,Highly doubly excited states of helium under periodic driving and the formation of nondispersive wave packets, Phd thesis, Universidad del Valle (2018)

    A. Gonz´ alez Melan,Highly doubly excited states of helium under periodic driving and the formation of nondispersive wave packets, Phd thesis, Universidad del Valle (2018)

    2018

  18. [18]

    Gonz´ alez-Melan, J

    A. Gonz´ alez-Melan, J. F. L. Ocampo, and J. Madro˜ nero, Floquet-engineered nondispersive wave packets in helium under combined periodic and static fields, Phys. Rev. A 112, 022822 (2025)

    2025

  19. [19]

    Foumouo, G

    E. Foumouo, G. L. Kamta, G. Edah, and B. Piraux, Theory of multiphoton single and double ionization of two-electron atomic systems driven by short-wavelength electric fields: An ab initio treatment, Phys. Rev. A 74, 063409 (2006)

    2006

  20. [20]

    Ho, The method of complex coordinate rotation and its applications to atomic collision processes, Physics Reports 99, 1 (1983)

    Y. Ho, The method of complex coordinate rotation and its applications to atomic collision processes, Physics Reports 99, 1 (1983)

    1983

  21. [21]

    Madro˜ nero, P

    J. Madro˜ nero, P. Schlagheck, L. Hilico, B. Gr´ emaud, D. Delande, and A. Buchleitner, Decay rates of planar helium, Europhysics Letters 70, 183 (2005)

    2005

  22. [22]

    Eiglsperger, M

    J. Eiglsperger, M. Sch¨ onwetter, B. Piraux, and J. Madro˜ nero, Spectral data for doubly excited states of helium with non-zero total angular momentum, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables. 98, 120–148 (2012)

    2012

  23. [23]

    W. V. Gansbeke, S. Vandenhende, S. Georgoulis, M. Proesmans, and L. V. Gool, Learning to classify images without labels, CoRR abs/2005.12320 (2020), 2005.12320

    work page arXiv 2005

  24. [24]

    Khalil, A

    M. Khalil, A. Khalil, and A. Ngom, A comprehensive study of vision transformers in image classification tasks (2023), arXiv:2312.01232 [cs.CV]

    work page arXiv 2023

  25. [25]

    X. Ji, J. F. Henriques, and A. Vedaldi, Invariant information clustering for unsupervised image classification and segmentation, CoRRabs/1807.06653 (2018), 1807.06653

    work page arXiv 2018

  26. [26]

    Goodfellow, Y

    I. Goodfellow, Y. Bengio, and A. Courville, Deep Learning (The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2016)

    2016

  27. [27]

    Radhakrishnan, D

    A. Radhakrishnan, D. Beaglehole, P. Pandit, and M. Belkin, Mechanism for feature learning in neural networks and backpropagation-free machine learning models, Science 383, 1461 (2024)

    2024

  28. [28]

    Floquet, Sur les ´ equations diff´ erentielles lin´ eaires ` a coefficients p´ eriodiques, Annales scientifiques de l’´Ecole Normale Sup´ erieure2e s´ erie, 12, 47 (1883)

    G. Floquet, Sur les ´ equations diff´ erentielles lin´ eaires ` a coefficients p´ eriodiques, Annales scientifiques de l’´Ecole Normale Sup´ erieure2e s´ erie, 12, 47 (1883)

  29. [29]

    J. H. Shirley, Solution of the schr¨ odinger equation with a hamiltonian periodic in time, Phys. Rev. 138, B979 (1965)

    1965

  30. [30]

    Balslev and J

    E. Balslev and J. M. Combes, Spectral properties of many-body schr¨ odinger operators with 10 dilatation-analytic interactions, Comm. Math. Phys. 22, 280 (1971)

    1971

  31. [31]

    W. P. Reinhardt, Complex coordinates in the theory of atomic and molecular structure and dynamics, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 33, 223 (1982)

    1982

  32. [32]

    Schlagheck and A

    P. Schlagheck and A. Buchleitner, Nondispersive two-electron wave packets in driven helium, Eur. Phys. J. D. 22, 401–415 (2003)

    2003

  33. [33]

    Schlagheck and A

    P. Schlagheck and A. Buchleitner, J. Phys. B. 31, L489 (1998)

    1998

  34. [34]

    Kumar, A

    T. Kumar, A. Mileo, R. Brennan, and M. Bendechache, Image data augmentation approaches: A comprehensive survey and future directions (2023), arXiv:2301.02830 [cs.CV]

    work page arXiv 2023

  35. [35]

    Z. Wang, P. Wang, K. Liu, P. Wang, Y. Fu, C.-T. Lu, C. C. Aggarwal, J. Pei, and Y. Zhou, A comprehensive survey on data augmentation (2025), arXiv:2405.09591 [cs.LG]

    work page arXiv 2025

  36. [36]

    Huang, S

    T. Huang, S. Halbe, C. Sankar, P. Amini, S. Kottur, A. Geramifard, M. Razaviyayn, and A. Beirami, Robustness through data augmentation loss consistency (2023), arXiv:2110.11205 [cs.LG]

    work page arXiv 2023

  37. [37]

    Gao and L

    B. Gao and L. Pavel, On the properties of the softmax function with application in game theory and reinforcement learning (2017)

    2017

  38. [38]

    Paszke, S

    A. Paszke, S. Gross, S. Chintala, G. Chanan, E. Yang, Z. DeVito, Z. Lin, A. Desmaison, L. Antiga, and A. Lerer, Automatic differentiation in pytorch, in NIPS-W (2017)

    2017

  39. [39]

    Salman, V

    R. Salman, V. Kecman, Q. Li, R. Strack, and E. Test, Fast k-means algorithm clustering, Int. J. Comput. Netw. Commun. 3, 17–31 (2011)

    2011

  40. [40]

    Kanungo, D

    T. Kanungo, D. Mount, N. Netanyahu, C. Piatko, R. Silverman, and A. Wu, An efficient k-means clustering algorithm: analysis and implementation, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 24, 881 (2002)

    2002

  41. [41]

    A. M. Ikotun, A. E. Ezugwu, L. Abualigah, B. Abuhaija, and J. Heming, K-means clustering algorithms: A comprehensive review, variants analysis, and advances in the era of big data, Information Sciences622, 178 (2023)

    2023

  42. [42]

    D.-T. Dinh, T. Fujinami, and V.-N. Huynh, Estimating the optimal number of clusters in categorical data clustering by silhouette coefficient, in Knowledge and Systems Sciences (Springer Singapore, 2019) p. 1–17

    2019

  43. [43]

    P. J. Rousseeuw, Silhouettes: A graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis, J. Comput. Appl. Math. 20, 53 (1987)

    1987

  44. [44]

    Schubert, Stop using the elbow criterion for k-means and how to choose the number of clusters instead, ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter 25, 36–42 (2023)

    E. Schubert, Stop using the elbow criterion for k-means and how to choose the number of clusters instead, ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter 25, 36–42 (2023)

    2023

  45. [45]

    Nanjundan, S

    S. Nanjundan, S. Sankaran, C. R. Arjun, and G. P. Anand, Identifying the number of clusters for k-means: A hypersphere density based approach (2019), arXiv:1912.00643 [cs.LG]

    work page arXiv 2019

  46. [46]

    Liu, M.-K

    C.-N. Liu, M.-K. Chen, and C. D. Lin, Radiative decay of helium doubly excited states, Phys. Rev. A 64, 010501 (2001)

    2001

  47. [47]

    Coreno, K

    M. Coreno, K. C. Prince, R. Richter, M. de Simone, K. Buˇ car, and M. ˇZitnik, Branching ratios in the radiative decay of helium doubly excited states, Phys. Rev. A 72, 052512 (2005)

    2005

  48. [48]

    Chang, E

    Y. Chang, E. Tanin, G. Cong, C. S. Jensen, and J. Qi, Trajectory similarity measurement: An efficiency perspective (2024), arXiv:2311.00960 [cs.DB]

    work page arXiv 2024

  49. [49]

    Y. Tao, A. Both, R. I. Silveira, K. Buchin, S. Sijben, R. S. Purves, P. Laube, D. Peng, K. Toohey, and M. D. and, A comparative analysis of trajectory similarity measures, GIScience & Remote Sensing 58, 643 (2021)

    2021

  50. [50]

    Portugal, P

    I. Portugal, P. Alencar, and D. Cowan, A framework for spatial-temporal cluster evolution representation and analysis based on graphs, Scientific Reports 14, 22137 (2024)

    2024

  51. [51]

    A. I. Masker, K. Zhou, J. P. Molnar, and S. J. Grauer, Neural optical flow for planar and stereo piv, Experiments in Fluids 66, 10.1007/s00348-025-04058-1 (2025)

    work page doi:10.1007/s00348-025-04058-1 2025

  52. [52]

    D. Tran, L. Bourdev, R. Fergus, L. Torresani, and M. Paluri, Learning spatiotemporal features with 3d convolutional networks (2015), arXiv:1412.0767 [cs.CV]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  53. [53]

    T. M. Cover and J. A. Thomas, Elements of Information Theory (Wiley Series in Telecommunications and Signal Processing) (Wiley-Interscience, USA, 2006)

    2006

  54. [54]

    Abdouraman, A

    A. Abdouraman, A. L. Frapiccini, A. Hamido, F. Mota-Furtado, P. F. O’Mahony, D. Mitnik, G. Gasaneo, and B. Piraux, Sturmian bases for two-electron systems in hyperspherical coordinates, J. Phys. B. 49, 235005 (2016)

    2016

  55. [55]

    H. Zhao, Z. Lai, H. Leung, and X. Zhang, Neural-network-based feature learning: Convolutional neural network, in Feature Learning and Understanding: Algorithms and Applications (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2020) pp. 219–251

    2020

  56. [56]

    Hilico, B

    L. Hilico, B. Gr´ emaud, T. Jonckheere, N. Billy, and D. Delande, Quantum three-body coulomb problem in two dimensions, Phys. Rev. A 66, 022101 (2002)

    2002

  57. [57]

    Rotenberg, Theory and application of sturmian functions (Academic Press, 1970) pp

    M. Rotenberg, Theory and application of sturmian functions (Academic Press, 1970) pp. 233–268

    1970

  58. [58]

    D. A. Varshalovich, A. N. Moskalev, and V. K. Khersonskii, eds., Quantum Theory of Angular Momentum (World Scientific, Singapore, 2008) p. 524

    2008

  59. [59]

    J. e. a. Zamastil, The use of so(2, 1) algebra for the evaluation of atomic integrals: The study of two-electron atoms, J. Math. Phys. 45, 2674 (2004)

    2004

  60. [60]

    Zamastil, F

    J. Zamastil, F. Vinette, and M. ˇSim´ anek, Calculation of atomic integrals using commutation relations, Phys. Rev. A 75, 022506 (2007)

    2007

  61. [61]

    Buchleitner, B

    A. Buchleitner, B. Gremaud, and D. Delande, Wavefunctions of atomic resonances, J. Phys. B.27, 2663 (1994)

    1994

  62. [62]

    T. L. Curtright and C. K. Zachos, Quantum mechanics in phase space, Asia Pac. Phys. Newsl. 01, 37–46 (2012)

    2012

  63. [63]

    V. N. Vapnik, The nature of statistical learning theory (Springer New York, 2018)

    2018

  64. [64]

    Burgers, D

    A. Burgers, D. Wintgen, and J. M. Rest, Highly doubly excited s states of the helium atom, J. Phys. B. 28, 3163 (1995)

    1995

This paper was first reviewed by grok-4.3 on June 29, 2026.