pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.25872 · v1 · pith:VVRLOQG5new · submitted 2026-05-25 · ❄️ cond-mat.dis-nn · cond-mat.stat-mech· physics.comp-ph

Cluster moves with an entropic reservoir accelerate low-temperature simulations of three-dimensional spin glasses

Claudio Chilin , Enzo Marinari , V\'ictor Mart\'in-Mayor , Giorgio Parisi , Juan J. Ruiz-Lorenzo , David Yllanes This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 19:24 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.dis-nn cond-mat.stat-mechphysics.comp-ph
keywords spin glassesMonte Carlo simulationparallel temperingHoudayer moveslow-temperature phasetemperature chaoscluster algorithmsentropic reservoir
0
0 comments X

The pith

Parallel Tempering with Houdayer moves and an entropic reservoir equilibrates L=16 three-dimensional spin glasses at T>=0.2

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents PTHR, an algorithm that augments standard parallel tempering by incorporating Houdayer cluster moves and an entropic reservoir. This combination is shown to equilibrate many samples of L=16 lattices with Gaussian couplings at temperatures down to 0.2, reaching deeper into the low-temperature phase than prior approaches. The computational complexity scales more favorably with system size than conventional parallel tempering. For finite sizes the method delivers roughly a 64-fold speedup relative to other cluster algorithms. The performance is tied to temperature chaos in the same way as standard parallel tempering.

Core claim

PTHR allows equilibration of a large number of L=16 three-dimensional spin-glass samples with Gaussian couplings for T greater than or equal to 0.2, exhibits better size scaling of computational complexity than standard parallel tempering, and outperforms other cluster algorithms by a speedup factor of around 64, with complexity strongly linked to temperature chaos.

What carries the argument

PTHR (Parallel Tempering enhanced with Houdayer moves and entropic reservoir), which augments replica-exchange dynamics with cluster updates and an auxiliary reservoir to accelerate mixing while aiming to preserve the correct equilibrium distribution.

If this is right

  • Equilibration of L=16 systems becomes practical at temperatures previously inaccessible with standard parallel tempering.
  • The computational cost grows more slowly with linear size L than in conventional parallel tempering.
  • A roughly 64-fold reduction in wall-clock time is realized compared with alternative cluster-based methods at fixed finite size.
  • The dominant computational bottleneck remains governed by temperature chaos, as in ordinary parallel tempering.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The entropic-reservoir construction may be portable to other frustrated systems whose slow dynamics arise from similar overlap distributions.
  • If the scaling advantage persists to larger L, PTHR could enable controlled studies of the thermodynamic limit for three-dimensional spin glasses.
  • Because the method is built on top of existing parallel-tempering infrastructure, it can be combined with other acceleration techniques such as population annealing without major redesign.

Load-bearing premise

Adding the Houdayer moves and entropic reservoir leaves the long-time sampling unbiased with respect to the Boltzmann measure.

What would settle it

Direct comparison of energy histograms or overlap distributions obtained from PTHR against exact enumeration results on small lattices to detect any systematic deviation from the expected equilibrium statistics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.25872 by Claudio Chilin, David Yllanes, Enzo Marinari, Giorgio Parisi, Juan J. Ruiz-Lorenzo, V\'ictor Mart\'in-Mayor.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Largest clusters in equilibrated configurations. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The PTHR speedup. Left: ⟨S⟩, defined in Eq.(5), against temperature, as computed for the same set of 2000 samples of L = 14 lattices in three different simulations, which employ either plain Parallel Tempering (PT) or the algorithm explained in Sec. 3 (PTHR). The orange line corresponds to PTHR with a total simulation tmax = 4×105 EMCSs, the purple line is for PTHR with tmax = 4 × 104 and the red line is P… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Autocorrelation times for plain PT. Results of plain PT simulations for different minimum temperature Tmin and different linear sizes L of the 3D Edwards-Anderson model with binary couplings Jij = ±1. Notice that for binary couplings Tc = 1.102(3) [37]. Left: Histogram of the autocorrelation time τcorr for 1000 samples of L = 32 with Tmin = 0.985 ≈ 0.895Tc (purple) and Tmin = 0.703 ≈ 0.64Tc (green). Right:… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Sample-to-sample fluctuations of the mixing time for the temperature random [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Temperature random walk and temperature chaos. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Equilibration Schwinger-Dyson-Young parameter ⟨S⟩ [Eq. (5)] versus temperature, as computed for time bins 1 (green), 2 (orange) and 3 (blue) of our PTHR simulation for L = 16, Tmin = 0.2 and tmax = 3.84×107 . Time bins are defined in Eq. (8). The black curve is obtained from bin 0 of our L = 18 simulation (see Appendix A), which has not achieved equilibration. What makes it attractive to consider the numbe… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present an algorithm for the simulation of three-dimensional spin glasses deep in the low-temperature phase: Parallel Tempering enhanced with Houdayer moves and with an entropic reservoir (PTHR). Although differences with the standard Houdayer algorithm are small, PTHR allows us to equilibrate a large number of samples of $L=16$ lattices with Gaussian couplings for temperatures $T\geq 0.2$. We show that the computational complexity displays better size scaling than standard Parallel Tempering. For finite sizes, our method outperforms other cluster algorithms by a speedup factor of around 64. In close analogy with standard Parallel Tempering, PTHR's computational complexity strongly relates to temperature chaos.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces Parallel Tempering enhanced with Houdayer moves and an entropic reservoir (PTHR) for Monte Carlo simulation of three-dimensional Edwards-Anderson spin glasses. It claims that PTHR equilibrates large numbers of L=16 samples with Gaussian couplings down to T=0.2, exhibits improved finite-size scaling relative to standard Parallel Tempering, and delivers an approximately 64-fold speedup over other cluster algorithms, with computational cost governed by temperature chaos in close analogy to PT.

Significance. If the sampling remains unbiased and the reported performance metrics are reproducible, the algorithm would constitute a practical advance for accessing the low-temperature phase of 3D spin glasses, where conventional methods struggle with equilibration.

major comments (2)
  1. [Algorithm description (likely §2–3)] The central performance claims (equilibration of L=16 at T≥0.2 and the 64× speedup) rest on the assertion that the entropic reservoir plus modified Houdayer updates leave the stationary distribution unchanged. No derivation is supplied showing that the reservoir acceptance probabilities satisfy detailed balance with respect to the target Boltzmann measure, nor are any numerical diagnostics (e.g., overlap histograms or energy distributions compared against plain PT on identical instances) presented to confirm unbiased sampling.
  2. [Results section (performance claims)] The statement that “PTHR allows us to equilibrate” L=16 systems is unsupported by any reported equilibration diagnostics, autocorrelation times, or convergence tests in the results. Without these, the scaling and speedup comparisons cannot be interpreted as evidence of correct thermalization.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract and results should include error bars on all timing and speedup figures together with the number of independent disorder realizations used.
  2. Clarify the precise differences between the “modified” Houdayer moves employed here and the original Houdayer algorithm; a side-by-side pseudocode comparison would help.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review. The points raised identify areas where the manuscript can be strengthened by adding explicit derivations and diagnostics. We address each major comment below and will incorporate the suggested material in a revised version.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Algorithm description (likely §2–3)] The central performance claims (equilibration of L=16 at T≥0.2 and the 64× speedup) rest on the assertion that the entropic reservoir plus modified Houdayer updates leave the stationary distribution unchanged. No derivation is supplied showing that the reservoir acceptance probabilities satisfy detailed balance with respect to the target Boltzmann measure, nor are any numerical diagnostics (e.g., overlap histograms or energy distributions compared against plain PT on identical instances) presented to confirm unbiased sampling.

    Authors: We acknowledge that an explicit derivation of detailed balance for the entropic-reservoir acceptance probabilities and the modified Houdayer moves was omitted from the original manuscript. In the revision we will add a dedicated subsection deriving that these updates satisfy detailed balance with respect to the target Boltzmann distribution. We will also include direct numerical comparisons—overlap histograms and energy distributions—between PTHR and standard parallel tempering performed on identical disorder realizations to confirm that the stationary distribution remains unbiased. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results section (performance claims)] The statement that “PTHR allows us to equilibrate” L=16 systems is unsupported by any reported equilibration diagnostics, autocorrelation times, or convergence tests in the results. Without these, the scaling and speedup comparisons cannot be interpreted as evidence of correct thermalization.

    Authors: We agree that the results section would be strengthened by explicit equilibration diagnostics. In the revised manuscript we will report integrated autocorrelation times for the overlap and energy, present convergence tests that demonstrate stabilization of observables with increasing run length, and include checks for the absence of systematic drift in running averages. These additions will directly support the claim that the reported L=16 ensembles are thermalized at T ≥ 0.2. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity in algorithmic performance claims

full rationale

The paper presents PTHR as a practical algorithmic enhancement to Parallel Tempering, with claims of equilibration for L=16 instances, improved size scaling, and ~64x speedup framed as empirical simulation outcomes rather than any closed mathematical derivation. No equations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or self-citation chains appear in the abstract or description that would reduce the reported results to their inputs by construction. The analogy to standard PT is stated explicitly but does not carry load-bearing uniqueness theorems or ansatzes from prior self-work. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks of runtime and equilibration metrics.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review supplies no information on free parameters, axioms, or invented entities.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5672 in / 1033 out tokens · 25891 ms · 2026-06-29T19:24:40.444901+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Cluster-based Message-Passing (CluMP) Optimization for Complex QUBO Problems

    cond-mat.dis-nn 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    CluMP introduces cluster-based message-passing updates informed by belief propagation to reach lower energies in complex QUBO problems on sparse graphs.

  2. High Resolution Study of the 2D ANNNI Model Using a Two-replica Cluster Algorithm and Population Annealing

    cond-mat.stat-mech 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A two-replica cluster algorithm with population annealing fully resolves the sequence of sharp specific heat peaks in the finite-size incommensurate floating phase of the 2D ANNNI model and outperforms single-replica ...

  3. On the true low-energy excitations of the three-dimensional spin glass

    cond-mat.dis-nn 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Monte Carlo simulations up to L=18 yield evidence supporting replica symmetry breaking for low-energy excitations in 3D spin glasses and confirm the overlap-equivalence hypothesis.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 31 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Mydosh J A 1993Spin Glasses: an Experimental Introduction(London: Taylor and Francis)

  2. [2]

    Young A P 1998Spin Glasses and Random Fields(Singapore: World Scientific)

  3. [3]

    M ´ezard M, Parisi G and Virasoro M 1987Spin-Glass Theory and Beyond(Singapore: World Scientific)

  4. [4]

    Charbonneau P, Marinari E, M ´ezard M, Parisi G, Ricci-Tersenghi F, Sicuro G and Zamponi F (eds) 2023 Spin Glass Theory and Far Beyond(World Sientific)

    2023

  5. [5]

    Parisi G 2023Rev. Mod. Phys.95(3) 030501 URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ RevModPhys.95.030501

  6. [6]

    Dahlberg E, Gonz ´alez-Adalid Pemart´ın I, Marinari E, Martin-Mayor V , Moreno-Gordo J, Orbach R, Paga I, Parisi G, Ricci-Tersenghi F, Ruiz-Lorenzo J and Yllanes D 2025Rev. Mod. Phys.97045005 URL https://doi.org/10.1103/ctp2-zwyr Cluster moves with an entropic reservoir accelerate low-temperature simulations22

    work page doi:10.1103/ctp2-zwyr

  7. [7]

    Edwards S F and Anderson P W 1975Journal of Physics F: Metal PhysicsF5965 URLhttp: //stacks.iop.org/0305-4608/5/i=5/a=017

  8. [8]

    Phys.F61927 URLhttp://stacks.iop.org/ 0305-4608/6/i=10/a=022

    Edwards S F and Anderson P W 1976J. Phys.F61927 URLhttp://stacks.iop.org/ 0305-4608/6/i=10/a=022

  9. [9]

    iop.org/0305-4470/15/i=10/a=028

    Barahona F 1982Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General153241 URLhttp://stacks. iop.org/0305-4470/15/i=10/a=028

  10. [10]

    Istrail S 2000 Statistical mechanics, three-dimensionality and np-completeness: I. universality of intracatability for the partition function of the ising model across non-planar surfaces (extended abstract) Proceedings of the thirty-second annual ACM symposium on Theory of computingpp 87–96

    2000

  11. [11]

    Rev.B327384 URLhttps://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.32.7384

    Ogielski A T 1985Phys. Rev.B327384 URLhttps://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.32.7384

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.32.7384

  12. [12]

    Cruz A, Pech J, Tarancon A, Tellez P, Ullod C L and Ungil C 2001Comp. Phys. Comm133165–176 URL https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-4655(00)00170-3

    work page doi:10.1016/s0010-4655(00)00170-3

  13. [13]

    Belletti F, Cotallo M, Cruz A, Fernandez L A, Gordillo A, Maiorano A, Mantovani F, Marinari E, Mart ´ın- Mayor V , Mu˜noz Sudupe A, Navarro D, Perez-Gaviro S, Ruiz-Lorenzo J J, Schifano S F, Sciretti D, Tarancon A, Tripiccione R and Velasco J L (Janus Collaboration) 2008Comp. Phys. Comm.178208– 216 URLhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2007.09.006

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2007.09.006 2007

  14. [14]

    Matsubara S, Takatsu M, Miyazawa T, Shibasaki T, Watanabe Y , Takemoto K and Tamura H 2020 Digital annealer for high-speed solving of combinatorial optimization problems and its applications2020 25th Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference (ASP-DAC)pp 667–672

    2020

  15. [15]

    McGeoch C and Farr ´e P 2022D-Wave Technical Report SeriesURLhttps://www.dwavesys.com/ media/3xvdipcn/14-1058a-a_advantage_processor_overview.pdf

  16. [16]

    McMahon P L, Marandi A, Haribara Y , Hamerly R, Langrock C, Tamate S, Inagaki T, Takesue H, Utsunomiya S, Aihara K, Byer R L, Fejer M M, Mabuchi H and Yamamoto Y 2016Science354614–617 URLhttps://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/science.aah5178

    work page doi:10.1126/science.aah5178

  17. [17]

    Baity-Jesi M, Ba ˜nos R A, Cruz A, Fernandez L A, Gil-Narvion J M, Gordillo-Guerrero A, Guidetti M, Iniguez D, Maiorano A, Mantovani F, Marinari E, Mart´ın-Mayor V , Monforte-Garcia J, Munoz Sudupe A, Navarro D, Parisi G, Pivanti M, Perez-Gaviro S, Ricci-Tersenghi F, Ruiz-Lorenzo J J, Schifano S F, Seoane B, Tarancon A, Tellez P, Tripiccione R and Yllanes...

    work page doi:10.1140/epjst/e2012-01636-9

  18. [18]

    Baity-Jesi M, Ba ˜nos R A, Cruz A, Fernandez L A, Gil-Narvion J M, Gordillo-Guerrero A, Iniguez D, Maiorano A, Mantovani F, Marinari E, Mart´ın-Mayor V , Monforte-Garcia J, Mu˜noz Sudupe A, Navarro D, Parisi G, Perez-Gaviro S, Pivanti M, Ricci-Tersenghi F, Ruiz-Lorenzo J J, Schifano S F, Seoane B, Tarancon A, Tripiccione R and Yllanes D (Janus Collaborati...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2013.10.019 2013

  19. [19]

    Sajeeb M, Delacour C, Callahan-Coray K, Seshan S, Srimani T and Camsari K Y 2026 Probabilistic computers for mimo detection: From sparsification to 2d parallel tempering (PreprintarXiv:2601. 09037)

    2026

  20. [20]

    Zhu R, Singh A K, Laydevant J, Wu F O, Kapelyan A, Venturelli D, Jamieson K and McMahon P L 2026 A fully parallel densely connected probabilistic ising machine with inertia for real-time applications (PreprintarXiv:2604.17109)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  21. [21]

    Caracciolo S, Hartmann A K, Kirkpatrick S and Weigel M 2023 Simulated annealing, optimization, searching for ground statesSpin Glass Theory and Far Beyond Replica Symmetry Breaking after 40 Years(Singapur: World Scientific)

    2023

  22. [22]

    Palassini M and Young A P 2000Phys. Rev. Lett.85(14) 3017–3020 URLhttps://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.3017

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.85.3017

  23. [23]

    Rev.B68064413 URLhttps://doi

    Palassini M, Liers F, Juenger M and Young A P 2003Phys. Rev.B68064413 URLhttps://doi. org/10.1103/PhysRevB.68.064413

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.68.064413

  24. [24]

    Shen M, Ortiz G, Liu Y Y , Weigel M and Nussinov Z 2024Phys. Rev. Lett.132(24) 247101 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.247101

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.132.247101

  25. [25]

    sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378437196002415 Cluster moves with an entropic reservoir accelerate low-temperature simulations23

    P ´al K F 1996Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications23360–66 URLhttps://www. sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378437196002415 Cluster moves with an entropic reservoir accelerate low-temperature simulations23

  26. [26]

    com/science/article/pii/S0378437109002544

    Rom ´a F, Risau-Gusman S, Ramirez-Pastor A, Nieto F and V ogel E 2009Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications3882821–2838 ISSN 0378-4371 URLhttps://www.sciencedirect. com/science/article/pii/S0378437109002544

  27. [27]

    Marinari E and Parisi G 2001Phys. Rev. Lett.86(17) 3887–3890 URLhttps://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.3887

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.86.3887

  28. [28]

    org/10.1073/pnas.2534768123

    Del Bono L M, Ricci-Tersenghi F and Zamponi F 2026PNAS123e2534768123 URLhttps://doi. org/10.1073/pnas.2534768123

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.2534768123

  29. [29]

    Hukushima K and Nemoto K 1996J. Phys. Soc. Japan651604 URLhttps://doi.org/10.1143/ JPSJ.65.1604

  30. [30]

    Marinari E 1998 Optimized Monte Carlo methodsAdvances in Computer Simulationed Kerst ´esz J and Kondor I (Springer-Verlag)

    1998

  31. [31]

    Hukushima K and Iba Y 2003AIP Conference Proceedings690200–206 ISSN 0094-243X URLhttps: //doi.org/10.1063/1.1632130

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1632130

  32. [32]

    Machta J 2010Phys. Rev. E82(2) 026704 URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevE.82.026704

  33. [33]

    Wang W, Machta J and Katzgraber H G 2015Phys. Rev. E92(6) 063307 URLhttps://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.92.063307

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.92.063307

  34. [34]

    Barash L Y , Weigel M, Borovsk´y M, Janke W and Shchur L N 2017Computer Physics Communications 220341–350 ISSN 0010-4655 URLhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2017.06.020

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2017.06.020 2017

  35. [35]

    Alvarez Ba ˜nos R, Cruz A, Fernandez L A, Gil-Narvion J M, Gordillo-Guerrero A, Guidetti M, Maiorano A, Mantovani F, Marinari E, Mart´ın-Mayor V , Monforte-Garcia J, Mu˜noz Sudupe A, Navarro D, Parisi G, Perez-Gaviro S, Ruiz-Lorenzo J J, Schifano S F, Seoane B, Tarancon A, Tripiccione R and Yllanes D (Janus Collaboration) 2010J. Stat. Mech.2010P06026 URLh...

    2010

  36. [36]

    Alvarez Ba ˜nos R, Cruz A, Fernandez L A, Gil-Narvion J M, Gordillo-Guerrero A, Guidetti M, Maiorano A, Mantovani F, Marinari E, Mart´ın-Mayor V , Monforte-Garcia J, Mu˜noz Sudupe A, Navarro D, Parisi G, Perez-Gaviro S, Ruiz-Lorenzo J J, Schifano S F, Seoane B, Tarancon A, Tripiccione R and Yllanes D (Janus Collaboration) 2010Phys. Rev. Lett.105177202 URL...

  37. [37]

    Baity-Jesi M, Ba ˜nos R A, Cruz A, Fernandez L A, Gil-Narvion J M, Gordillo-Guerrero A, Iniguez D, Maiorano A, Mantovani F, Marinari E, Mart´ın-Mayor V , Monforte-Garcia J, Mu˜noz Sudupe A, Navarro D, Parisi G, Perez-Gaviro S, Pivanti M, Ricci-Tersenghi F, Ruiz-Lorenzo J J, Schifano S F, Seoane B, Tarancon A, Tripiccione R and Yllanes D (Janus Collaborati...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.88.224416

  38. [38]

    Marinari E, Parisi G and Ruiz-Lorenzo J J 1998Phys. Rev. B58(22) 14852–14863 URLhttps: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.58.14852

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.58.14852

  39. [39]

    Rev.B63184422 URLhttps://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevB.63.184422

    Katzgraber H G, Palassini M and Young A P 2001Phys. Rev.B63184422 URLhttps://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevB.63.184422

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.63.184422

  40. [40]

    Katzgraber H G and Krzakala F 2007Phys. Rev. Lett.98017201 URLhttps://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.98.017201

  41. [41]

    Wang W 2026Phys. Rev. B113(1) 014203 URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ r17n-lg5f

  42. [42]

    Wang W, Machta J, Munoz-Bauza H and Katzgraber H G 2017Phys. Rev. B96(18) 184417 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.96.184417

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.96.184417

  43. [43]

    Wang W, Wallin M and Lidmar J 2020Phys. Rev. Res.2(4) 043241 URLhttps://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.043241

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.2.043241

  44. [44]

    org/10.1209/0295-5075/103/67003

    Fernandez L A, Mart ´ın-Mayor V , Parisi G and Seoane B 2013EPL10367003 URLhttps://doi. org/10.1209/0295-5075/103/67003

    work page doi:10.1209/0295-5075/103/67003

  45. [45]

    Billoire A, Fernandez L A, Maiorano A, Marinari E, Martin-Mayor V , Moreno-Gordo J, Parisi G, Ricci- Tersenghi F and Ruiz-Lorenzo J J 2018Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2018 033302 URLhttp://stacks.iop.org/1742-5468/2018/i=3/a=033302 Cluster moves with an entropic reservoir accelerate low-temperature simulations24

    2018

  46. [46]

    Fernandez L A, Marinari E, Martin-Mayor V , Parisi G and Ruiz-Lorenzo J J 2016Phys. Rev. B94(2) 024402 URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.94.024402

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.94.024402

  47. [47]

    Houdayer J 2001The European Physical Journal B - Condensed Matter and Complex Systems22479–484 URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/PL00011151

    work page doi:10.1007/pl00011151

  48. [48]

    Zhu Z, Ochoa A J and Katzgraber H G 2015Phys. Rev. Lett.115(7) 077201 URLhttp://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.077201

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.115.077201

  49. [49]

    Jacobs L and Rebbi C 1981J.Comput.Phys.41203 URLhttps://doi.org/10.1016/ 0021-9991(81)90089-9

  50. [50]

    Chilin C, Marinari E, Mart ´ın-Mayor V , Parisi G, Ruiz-Lorenzo J J and Yllanes D 2026 On the true low- energy excitations of the three-dimensional spin glass in preparation

    2026

  51. [51]

    Y .: Plenum)

    Sokal A D 1997 Monte Carlo methods in statistical mechanics: Foundations and new algorithmsFunctional Integration: Basics and Applications (1996 Carg`ese School)ed DeWitt-Morette C, Cartier P and Folacci A (N. Y .: Plenum)

    1997

  52. [52]

    Swendsen R H and Wang J S 1987Phys. Rev. Lett.58(2) 86–88 URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.58.86

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.58.86

  53. [53]

    Wolff U 1989Phys. Rev. Lett.62(4) 361–364 URLhttp://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.62.361

  54. [54]

    Rev.B80024422 URLhttps://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.80.024422

    Fernandez L A, Mart´ın-Mayor V , Perez-Gaviro S, Tarancon A and Young A P 2009Phys. Rev.B80024422 URLhttps://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.80.024422

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.80.024422

  55. [55]

    Bernaschi M, Fernandez L A, Gonz ´alez-Adalid Pemart´ın I, Martin-Mayor V , Parisi G and Ricci-Tersenghi F 2026 Low energy excitations in a long prism geometry: computing the lower critical dimension of the ising spin glass (Preprint2601.07926)

    work page arXiv 2026

  56. [56]

    Krzakala F and Martin O C 2000Phys. Rev. Lett.853013 URLhttps://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.85.3013

  57. [57]

    iop.org/0022-3719/13/i=19/a=002

    Bray A and Moore M 1980Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics13L469 URLhttp://stacks. iop.org/0022-3719/13/i=19/a=002

  58. [58]

    Bernaschi M, Chilin C, Fernandez L A, Gonz ´alez-Adalid Pemart´ın I, Marinari E, Martin-Mayor V , Parisi G, Ricci-Tersenghi F, Ruiz-Lorenzo J J and Yllanes D 2026Comp. Phys. Comm.325110182 URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2026.110182

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2026.110182 2026

  59. [59]

    Marinari E, Parisi G and Ruiz-Lorenzo J J 1998 Numerical Simulations of Spin Glass SystemsSpin glasses and random fieldsed Young A P (Singapore: World Scientific)

    1998

  60. [60]

    Rugged free-energy landscapes in disordered spin systems

    Yllanes D 2011Rugged Free-Energy Landscapes in Disordered Spin SystemsPh.D. thesis Universidad Complutense de Madrid (PreprintarXiv:1111.0266)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  61. [61]

    Fern ´andez L A, Marinari E, Mart´ın-Mayor V , Parisi G and Yllanes D 2016Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2016123301 URLhttp://stacks.iop.org/1742-5468/2016/i= 12/a=123301

    2016

  62. [62]

    Newman M E J and Barkema G T 1999Monte Carlo Methods in Statistical Physics(Oxford: Clarendon Press)

  63. [63]

    Blackman D and Vigna S 2021ACM Trans. Math. Softw.47ISSN 0098-3500 URLhttps://doi.org/ 10.1145/3460772

    work page doi:10.1145/3460772