pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.25918 · v1 · pith:KSLJHDQRnew · submitted 2026-05-25 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-th· nucl-th

Predicted Exotic Doubly Heavy-Strange Pentaquarks

Albert Feijoo , Eulogio Oset This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 21:39 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-thnucl-th
keywords exotic pentaquarksdoubly heavy hadronsstrange sectorcoupled channelsunitary approachheavy quarksbound statesresonances
0
0 comments X

The pith

A unitary coupled-channel model predicts multiple exotic pentaquarks containing two heavy quarks and one strange antiquark.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper applies a coupled-channel unitary framework derived from an extension of the local hidden gauge approach to systems with minimal quark content u d-bar s Q Q' where Q and Q' are heavy quarks. It reports a spectrum consisting of two states in the cc sector, three in the cb sector, and four in the bb sector, appearing as bound states or resonances, plus five virtual states visible as threshold cusps. The binding is driven by off-diagonal transitions between heavy-baryon and light-meson channels while diagonal terms are suppressed. A sympathetic reader would care because these states are manifestly exotic and would represent new members of the hadron spectrum beyond conventional quark-model assignments.

Core claim

We obtain a robust spectrum of manifestly exotic states; two states appear in the u d-bar s cc sector, three in u d-bar s cb, and four in u d-bar s bb. These emerge either as bound states or resonances, along with five additional virtual states manifested as threshold cusps. The binding mechanism is dominated by off-diagonal transitions among heavy-baryon--light-meson channels, while diagonal interactions are strongly suppressed.

What carries the argument

Coupled-channel unitary framework with interactions from the extension of the local hidden gauge approach to the heavy-quark sector, where off-diagonal transitions among heavy-baryon--light-meson channels dominate binding.

If this is right

  • These states constitute concrete targets for experimental searches in the doubly heavy-strange sector.
  • The spectrum extends exotic hadron spectroscopy into new flavor combinations with two heavy quarks and strangeness.
  • The dominance of off-diagonal transitions provides a specific mechanism that can be tested in related multi-quark systems.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If confirmed, the results would encourage application of the same framework to other combinations such as those with different light-quark content.
  • The predicted states could appear in production channels at facilities that produce heavy-flavor hadrons.
  • Discrepancies between predicted and observed masses might point to additional higher-order effects not included in the present calculation.

Load-bearing premise

The local hidden gauge approach remains valid when extended to the heavy-quark sector and the off-diagonal transitions dominate while diagonal interactions stay suppressed.

What would settle it

Experimental searches that fail to observe any of the predicted states near the calculated masses or that find resonances at positions inconsistent with the spectrum would falsify the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.25918 by Albert Feijoo, Eulogio Oset.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Diagrammatic representation of the interaction [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Squared absolute value of the elastic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Squared absolute value of the elastic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We predict exotic doubly heavy--strange pentaquarks with minimal quark content $u\bar d sQQ'$ ($QQ'=cc,bc,bb$) within a coupled-channel unitary framework where the interaction is derived from an extension of the local hidden gauge approach to the heavy-quark sector. We obtain a robust spectrum of manifestly exotic states; two states appear in the $u\bar d scc$ sector, three in $u\bar d scb$, and four in $u\bar d sbb$. These emerge either as bound states or resonances, along with five additional virtual states manifested as threshold cusps. The binding mechanism is dominated by off-diagonal transitions among heavy-baryon--light-meson channels, while diagonal interactions are strongly suppressed. These results extend exotic hadron spectroscopy into the doubly heavy--strange sector and provide concrete targets for future experimental searches.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims to predict exotic doubly heavy-strange pentaquarks with minimal quark content u d-bar s QQ' (QQ'=cc, bc, bb) in a coupled-channel unitary framework. The interaction kernel is derived from an extension of the local hidden gauge approach to the heavy-quark sector. It reports a spectrum of two states in the udscc sector, three in udscb, and four in udsbb, appearing as bound states or resonances, plus five additional virtual states as threshold cusps. Binding is attributed to dominant off-diagonal heavy-baryon--light-meson transitions with strongly suppressed diagonal interactions.

Significance. If the model assumptions hold, the work supplies specific, testable predictions for manifestly exotic states in a new sector, extending unitary coupled-channel methods and offering targets for LHCb or other experiments. The separation of resonant/bound states from virtual threshold cusps is a useful technical distinction. The significance is reduced by the dependence on an unvalidated extension whose key features (off-diagonal dominance) are asserted rather than independently tested.

major comments (2)
  1. Abstract: The assertion that binding is 'dominated by off-diagonal transitions ... while diagonal interactions are strongly suppressed' is load-bearing for the reported state counts (2/3/4); no explicit ratio of diagonal to off-diagonal amplitudes or variation with the regularization cutoff and heavy-sector couplings is shown, so the robustness of the spectrum under modest parameter changes cannot be assessed.
  2. Model section (interaction kernel): The extension of the local hidden gauge approach is used to generate the kernel without deriving the claimed diagonal suppression from the heavy-quark limit, lattice input, or explicit calculation; because the same two parameters control both the extension and the off-diagonal dominance, the predicted state numbers rest on an untested assumption rather than a first-principles result.
minor comments (2)
  1. Abstract: A short statement of the numerical cutoff value employed and the specific channels included would help readers gauge the setup without needing the full text.
  2. Results: Consider adding a compact table of pole positions, binding energies, and widths for the reported states to improve readability and allow direct comparison with future data.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments. We address each major comment below, offering clarifications on the model while agreeing to strengthen the presentation where appropriate.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Abstract: The assertion that binding is 'dominated by off-diagonal transitions ... while diagonal interactions are strongly suppressed' is load-bearing for the reported state counts (2/3/4); no explicit ratio of diagonal to off-diagonal amplitudes or variation with the regularization cutoff and heavy-sector couplings is shown, so the robustness of the spectrum under modest parameter changes cannot be assessed.

    Authors: We acknowledge that an explicit ratio of diagonal to off-diagonal amplitudes would make the claim more transparent. The suppression follows directly from the flavor structure of the extended local hidden gauge vertices, where diagonal heavy-baryon–light-meson transitions lack the leading vector-meson exchange contributions present in off-diagonal channels. The manuscript already employs standard cutoff values fixed in prior heavy-sector applications, but we agree that a sensitivity check is useful. In revision we will add a short table of representative coupling ratios and a one-paragraph discussion of cutoff variation. revision: partial

  2. Referee: Model section (interaction kernel): The extension of the local hidden gauge approach is used to generate the kernel without deriving the claimed diagonal suppression from the heavy-quark limit, lattice input, or explicit calculation; because the same two parameters control both the extension and the off-diagonal dominance, the predicted state numbers rest on an untested assumption rather than a first-principles result.

    Authors: The diagonal suppression is a direct consequence of the Lagrangian construction in the extended local hidden gauge framework, not an extra assumption; the same two parameters (regularization scale and heavy-sector coupling) are fixed once from light-sector phenomenology and then applied uniformly, as done in earlier works on heavy baryon–meson scattering. While we do not re-derive the vertices from the heavy-quark limit or lattice data in this paper, the kernel is built consistently with established results. We will insert a brief explanatory paragraph in the model section referencing the vertex structure that produces the suppression. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper presents a unitary coupled-channel calculation whose interaction kernel is obtained from an extension of the local hidden gauge approach applied to the heavy sector. The spectrum (bound states, resonances, and virtual states) is reported as the output of solving the Bethe-Salpeter equation with that kernel. No equation in the supplied text reduces a reported state count or binding energy to a fitted parameter by algebraic identity, nor does any load-bearing premise collapse to a self-citation whose validity is presupposed rather than independently justified. The statement that off-diagonal transitions dominate is presented as a finding of the calculation, not an inserted ansatz. The framework is therefore self-contained within its stated assumptions and does not exhibit the enumerated circularity patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of extending the local hidden gauge approach to heavy quarks and on typical regularization choices whose values are not supplied in the abstract; no new entities with independent evidence are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • regularization cutoff
    Standard in unitary approaches to tame loop integrals; value not given in abstract but required for numerical results.
  • heavy-sector coupling strengths
    Introduced or adjusted in the extension of the hidden gauge approach; not quantified in abstract.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The local hidden gauge approach extends reliably to the heavy-quark sector
    Invoked directly in the abstract as the source of the interaction.
  • domain assumption Off-diagonal transitions dominate binding while diagonal interactions are strongly suppressed
    Stated as the binding mechanism in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5678 in / 1523 out tokens · 36808 ms · 2026-06-29T21:39:40.510769+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

83 extracted references · 77 canonical work pages · 35 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    The lower vertex in Fig

    and (2) formally equivalent up to the additional polarization fact or, ⃗ ǫ⃗ ǫ′, in the vector-meson case. The lower vertex in Fig. 1 is most conveniently evaluated following the formalism of Ref. [ 64], where the interaction is written in terms of the quark wave functions of the exchanged vector meson and the baryons, LVBB′ = ⟨B′|gqV ¯qVγν ′ Vν ′ |B⟩ (3) ...

    2020

  2. [2]

    TABLE III

    among the coupled channels. TABLE III. Coefficients Cij for the P B( 1 2 + ) sector of u ¯dscc states. Ω + ccπ + Ξ ++ cc ¯K 0 Ξ + c D+ Ξ ′+ c D+ Ω + ccπ + 0 − 1 √ 3 2 √ 2 λ 1 1 2 √ 2 λ 1 Ξ ++ cc ¯K 0 0 − √ 3 2 √ 2 λ 2 1 2 √ 2 λ 2 Ξ + c D+ − λ 3 0 Ξ ′+ c D+ − λ 3 The coefficients λ 1, λ 2, and λ 3 account for the suppres- sion factors associated with the exc...

  3. [3]

    Observation of $J/\psi p$ resonances consistent with pentaquark states in ${\Lambda_b^0\to J/\psi K^-p}$ decays

    R. Aaij et al. (LHCb), Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 072001 (2015) , arXiv:1507.03414 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  4. [4]

    J.-J. Wu, R. Molina, E. Oset, and B. S. Zou, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 232001 (2010) , arXiv:1007.0573 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  5. [5]

    J.-J. Wu, R. Molina, E. Oset, and B. S. Zou, Phys. Rev. C 84, 015202 (2011) , arXiv:1011.2399 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  6. [6]

    The possible hidden-charm molecular baryons composed of anti-charmed meson and charmed baryon

    Z.-C. Yang, Z.-F. Sun, J. He, X. Liu, and S.-L. Zhu, Chin. Phys. C 36, 6 (2012) , arXiv:1105.2901 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  7. [7]

    C. W. Xiao, J. Nieves, and E. Oset, Phys. Rev. D 88, 056012 (2013) , arXiv:1304.5368 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  8. [8]

    New Exotic Meson and Baryon Resonances from Doubly-Heavy Hadronic Molecules

    M. Karliner and J. L. Rosner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 122001 (2015) , arXiv:1506.06386 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  9. [9]

    W. L. Wang, F. Huang, Z. Y . Zhang, and B. S. Zou, Phys. Rev. C 84, 015203 (2011) , arXiv:1101.0453 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  10. [10]

    S. G. Y uan, K. W. Wei, J. He, H. S. Xu, and B. S. Zou, Eur. Phys. J. A 48, 61 (2012) , arXiv:1201.0807 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  11. [11]

    Aaij et al

    R. Aaij et al. (LHCb), Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 062001 (2022) , arXiv:2108.04720 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2022

  12. [12]

    R. Chen, X. Liu, X.-Q. Li, and S.- L. Zhu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 132002 (2015) , arXiv:1507.03704 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  13. [13]

    $\bar{D}\Sigma^*_c$ and $\bar{D}^*\Sigma_c$ interactions and the LHCb hidden-charmed pentaquarks

    J. He, Phys. Lett. B 753, 547 (2016) , arXiv:1507.05200 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  14. [14]

    Emergence of a complete heavy-quark spin symmetry multiplet: seven molecular pentaquarks in light of the latest LHCb analysis

    M.-Z. Liu, Y .-W. Pan, F.-Z. Peng, M. S´ anchez S´ anchez, L.-S. Geng, A. Hosaka, and M. Pavon V alder- rama, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 242001 (2019) , arXiv:1903.11560 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  15. [15]

    M.-L. Du, V . Baru, F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, U.-G. Meißner, J. A. Oller, and Q. Wang, JHEP 08, 157 (2021) , arXiv:2102.07159 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  16. [16]

    H.-X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, T. G. Steele, and S.-L. Zhu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 172001 (2015) , arXiv:1507.03717 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  17. [17]

    Analysis of the $P_c(4380)$ and $P_c(4450)$ as pentaquark states in the diquark model with QCD sum rules

    Z.-G. Wang, Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 70 (2016) , arXiv:1508.01468 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  18. [18]

    Wang, Int

    Z.-G. Wang, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 35, 2050003 (2020) , arXiv:1905.02892 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  19. [19]

    P . G. Ortega, D. R. Entem, and F. Fern´ andez, Phys. Lett. B 764, 207 (2017) , arXiv:1606.06148 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  20. [20]

    W. Park, A. Park, S. Cho, and S. H. Lee, Phys. Rev. D 95, 054027 (2017) , arXiv:1702.00381 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  21. [21]

    Hidden-charm pentaquarks and $P_c$ states

    X.-Z. Weng, X.-L. Chen, W.-Z. Deng, and S.-L. Zhu, Phys. Rev. D 100, 016014 (2019) , arXiv:1904.09891 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  22. [22]

    R. Zhu, X. Liu, H. Huang, and C.-F. Qiao, Phys. Lett. B 797, 134869 (2019) , arXiv:1904.10285 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2019

  23. [23]

    Deng, Phys

    C.-R. Deng, Phys. Rev. D 105, 116021 (2022) , arXiv:2202.13570 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  24. [24]

    How to reveal the exotic nature of the P_c(4450)

    F.-K. Guo, U.-G. Meißner, W. Wang, and Z. Yang, Phys. Rev. D 92, 071502 (2015) , arXiv:1507.04950 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  25. [25]

    X.-H. Liu, Q. Wang, and Q. Zhao, Phys. Lett. B 757, 231 (2016) , arXiv:1507.05359 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  26. [26]

    A triangle singularity and the LHCb pentaquarks

    M. Mikhasenko, (2015), arXiv:1507.06552 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  27. [27]

    S. X. Nakamura, A. Hosaka, and Y . Ya- maguchi, Phys. Rev. D 104, L091503 (2021) , arXiv:2109.15235 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  28. [28]

    Coupled-channel study of crypto-exotic baryons with charm

    J. Hofmann and M. F. M. Lutz, Nucl. Phys. A 763, 90 (2005) , arXiv:hep-ph/0507071

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  29. [29]

    B. Wang, L. Meng, and S.-L. Zhu, Phys. Rev. D 101, 034018 (2020) , arXiv:1912.12592 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  30. [30]

    C. W. Xiao, J. Nieves, and E. Oset, Phys. Lett. B 799, 135051 (2019) , arXiv:1906.09010 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2019

  31. [31]

    V . V . Anisovich, M. A. Matveev, J. Nyiri, A. V . Sarantsev , and A. N. Semenova, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 30, 1550190 (2015) , arXiv:1509.04898 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  32. [32]

    Analysis of the ${\frac{1}{2}}^{\pm}$ pentaquark states in the diquark-diquark-antiquark model with QCD sum rules

    Z.-G. Wang, Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 142 (2016) , arXiv:1509.06436 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  33. [33]

    A hidden-charm $S=-1$ pentaquark from the decay of $\Lambda_b$ into $J/\psi \eta \Lambda$

    A. Feijoo, V . K. Magas, A. Ramos, and E. Oset, Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 446 (2016) , arXiv:1512.08152 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  34. [34]

    J.-X. Lu, E. Wang, J.-J. Xie, L.-S. Geng, and E. Oset, Phys. Rev. D 93, 094009 (2016) , arXiv:1601.00075 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  35. [35]

    Looking for a hidden-charm pentaquark state with strangeness $S=-1$ from $\Xi^-_b$ decay into $J/\psi K^- \Lambda$

    H.-X. Chen, L.-S. Geng, W.-H. Liang, E. Oset, E. Wang, and J.-J. Xie, Phys. Rev. C 93, 065203 (2016) , arXiv:1510.01803 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  36. [36]

    Shen, H.-J

    C.-W. Shen, H.-J. Jing, F.-K. Guo, and J.-J. Wu, Symmetry 12, 1611 (2020) , arXiv:2008.09082 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  37. [37]

    Aaij et al

    R. Aaij et al. (LHCb), Sci. Bull. 66, 1278 (2021) , arXiv:2012.10380 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2021

  38. [38]

    Aaij et al

    R. Aaij et al. (LHCb), Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 031901 (2023) , arXiv:2210.10346 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2023

  39. [39]

    H.-X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, and X.-H. Liu, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 409 (2021) , arXiv:2011.01079 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  40. [40]

    Chen, Chin

    H.-X. Chen, Chin. Phys. C 46, 093105 (2022) , arXiv:2011.07187 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  41. [41]

    Liu, Y .-W

    M.-Z. Liu, Y .-W. Pan, and L.-S. Geng, Phys. Rev. D 103, 034003 (2021) , arXiv:2011.07935 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  42. [42]

    Feijoo, W.-F

    A. Feijoo, W.-F. Wang, C.-W. Xiao, J.-J. Wu, E. Oset, J. Nieves, and B.-S. Zou, Phys. Lett. B 839, 137760 (2023) , arXiv:2212.12223 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  43. [43]

    Karliner and J

    M. Karliner and J. L. Rosner, Phys. Rev. D 106, 036024 (2022) , arXiv:2207.07581 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  44. [44]

    Wang and X

    F.-L. Wang and X. Liu, Phys. Lett. B 835, 137583 (2022) , arXiv:2207.10493 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  45. [45]

    Yan, F.-Z

    M.-J. Yan, F.-Z. Peng, M. S´ anchez S´ anchez, and M. Pavon V alderrama, Phys. Rev. D 107, 074025 (2023) , arXiv:2207.11144 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  46. [46]

    ¨Ozdem, Phys

    U. ¨Ozdem, Phys. Lett. B 836, 137635 (2023) , 8 arXiv:2208.07684 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  47. [47]

    P . G. Ortega, D. R. Entem, and F. Fernandez, Phys. Lett. B 838, 137747 (2023) , arXiv:2210.04465 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  48. [48]

    Wang, H.-Y

    F.-L. Wang, H.-Y . Zhou, Z.-W. Liu, and X. Liu, Phys. Rev. D 106, 054020 (2022) , arXiv:2208.10756 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  49. [49]

    Peng, M.-J

    F.-Z. Peng, M.-J. Yan, M. S´ anchez S´ anchez, and M. P . V alderrama, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 666 (2021) , arXiv:2011.01915 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  50. [50]

    C. W. Xiao, J. J. Wu, and B. S. Zou, Phys. Rev. D 103, 054016 (2021) , arXiv:2102.02607 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  51. [51]

    Zhu, L.-Q

    J.-T. Zhu, L.-Q. Song, and J. He, Phys. Rev. D 103, 074007 (2021) , arXiv:2101.12441 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  52. [52]

    T. J. Burns and E. S. Swanson, Phys. Lett. B 838, 137715 (2023) , arXiv:2208.05106 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  53. [53]

    S. X. Nakamura and J. J. Wu, Phys. Rev. D 108, L011501 (2023) , arXiv:2208.11995 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  54. [54]

    L. Meng, B. Wang, and S.-L. Zhu, Phys. Rev. D 107, 014005 (2023) , arXiv:2208.03883 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  55. [55]

    Wu and D.-Y

    Q. Wu and D.-Y . Chen, Phys. Rev. D 109, 094003 (2024) , arXiv:2402.14467 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  56. [56]

    F.-L. Wang, R. Chen, and X. Liu, Phys. Rev. D 103, 034014 (2021) , arXiv:2011.14296 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  57. [57]

    Ferretti and E

    J. Ferretti and E. Santopinto, JHEP 04, 119 (2020) , arXiv:2001.01067 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  58. [58]

    Azizi, Y

    K. Azizi, Y . Sarac, and H. Sundu, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 543 (2022) , arXiv:2112.15543 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  59. [59]

    J. A. Mars´ e-V alera, V . K. Magas, and A. Ramos, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 091903 (2023) , arXiv:2210.02792 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  60. [60]

    L. Roca, J. Song, and E. Oset, Phys. Rev. D 109, 094005 (2024) , arXiv:2403.08732 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  61. [61]

    Song, M.-Y

    J. Song, M.-Y . Duan, L. Roca, and E. Oset, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 1055 (2024) , arXiv:2406.14895 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  62. [62]

    Azizi, Y

    K. Azizi, Y . Sarac, and H. Sundu, Phys. Rev. D 107, 014023 (2023) , arXiv:2210.03471 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  63. [63]

    Odd Parity Light Baryon Resonances

    D. Gamermann, C. Garcia-Recio, J. Nieves, and L. L. Salc edo, Phys. Rev. D 84, 056017 (2011) , arXiv:1104.2737 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  64. [64]

    Feijoo and I

    A. Feijoo and I. Vida˜ na, Eur. Phys. J. A 61, 196 (2025) , arXiv:2411.18248 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  65. [65]

    Z.-Y . Yang, Q. Wang, and W. Chen, Phys. Rev. D 110, 056022 (2024) , arXiv:2405.09067 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  66. [66]

    V . R. Debastiani, J. M. Dias, W. H. Liang, and E. Oset, Phys. Rev. D 97, 094035 (2018) , arXiv:1710.04231 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  67. [67]

    Q. X. Y u, R. Pavao, V . R. Debastiani, and E. Oset, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 167 (2019) , arXiv:1811.11738 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  68. [68]

    W.-F. Wang, A. Feijoo, J. Song, and E. Oset, Phys. Rev. D 106, 116004 (2022) , arXiv:2208.14858 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  69. [69]

    Song and E

    J. Song and E. Oset, Phys. Rev. D 112, 074026 (2025) , arXiv:2506.09262 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  70. [70]

    Bando, T

    M. Bando, T. Kugo, S. Uehara, K. Yamawaki, and T. Yanagid a, Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 1215 (1985)

    1985

  71. [71]

    Bando, T

    M. Bando, T. Kugo, and K. Yamawaki, Physics Reports 164, 217 (1988)

    1988

  72. [72]

    Harada and K

    M. Harada and K. Yamawaki, Phys. Rept. 381, 1 (2003) , arXiv:hep-ph/0302103

    work page arXiv 2003

  73. [73]

    U. G. Meissner, Phys. Rept. 161, 213 (1988)

    1988

  74. [74]

    Hidden gauge formalism for the radiative decays of axial-vector mesons

    H. Nagahiro, L. Roca, A. Hosaka, and E. Oset, Phys. Rev. D 79, 014015 (2009) , arXiv:0809.0943 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  75. [75]

    Capstick and N

    S. Capstick and N. Isgur, Phys. Rev. D 34, 2809 (1986)

    1986

  76. [76]

    Heavy Baryons in a Quark Model

    W. Roberts and M. Pervin, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 23, 2817 (2008) , arXiv:0711.2492 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  77. [77]

    Structure and compositeness of hadron resonances

    T. Hyodo, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 28, 1330045 (2013) , arXiv:1310.1176 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  78. [78]

    Wang and B.-S

    Z.-L. Wang and B.-S. Zou, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 509 (2022) , arXiv:2203.02899 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  79. [79]

    Meson baryon components in the states of the baryon decuplet

    F. Aceti, L. R. Dai, L. S. Geng, E. Oset, and Y . Zhang, Eur. Phys. J. A 50, 57 (2014) , arXiv:1301.2554 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  80. [80]

    Couplings in coupled channels versus wave functions: application to the X(3872) resonance

    D. Gamermann, J. Nieves, E. Oset, and E. Ruiz Arriola, Phys. Rev. D 81, 014029 (2010) , arXiv:0911.4407 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

Showing first 80 references.