pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.27886 · v1 · pith:ODP7QYJOnew · submitted 2026-05-27 · 💻 cs.RO

Tabero: Learning Gentle Manipulation with Closed-Loop Force Feedback from Vision, Touch, and Language

Qiwei Wu , Rui Zhang , Xin Xiang , Tao Li , Weihua Zhang , Junjie Lai , Renjing Xu This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 12:25 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.RO
keywords gentle manipulationtactile sensingvision-language-actionforce feedbackrobotic manipulationclosed-loop controlmultimodal learninglanguage-conditioned tasks
0
0 comments X

The pith

A robot model learns to reduce grip force by over 70% under gentle language instructions while keeping high task success, by using closed-loop feedback from vision, touch, and language.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces Tabero as a benchmark and model suite for language-conditioned gentle robotic manipulation that requires precise force sensing. It tackles the shortage of aligned tactile data through a pipeline that repurposes existing open-source manipulation trajectories into diverse vision-tactile-language tasks, paired with an evaluation that tracks both success and physical interaction quality. The Tabero-VTLA model uses a decoupled force-position command interface executed by a fixed hybrid controller to support real-time force modulation. Tests on the benchmark show the model sustains task performance but lowers average grip force by more than 70% when instructed to be gentle, indicating it can adjust forces from multimodal inputs.

Core claim

Tabero-VTLA maintains high task success while reducing average grip force by over 70% under gentle instructions by modulating interaction forces based on multimodal experience from vision, touch, and language, using a decoupled force-position command interface executed by a fixed hybrid controller.

What carries the argument

Decoupled force-position command interface in Tabero-VTLA executed by a fixed hybrid controller for real-time closed-loop force-aware manipulation.

If this is right

  • Language instructions can directly shape the physical forces applied during contact-rich manipulation tasks.
  • Multimodal vision-tactile-language inputs enable closed-loop adjustment of interaction forces without separate force sensors at inference time.
  • Existing trajectory datasets can be transformed into sufficient training data for force-sensitive policies when aligned across modalities.
  • Manipulation evaluation protocols can jointly assess task completion and physical gentleness metrics.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same data-repurposing approach could apply to other contact-rich skills such as insertion or wiping where force limits matter.
  • Deploying such models in unstructured environments might reduce damage risk to fragile objects or surfaces during human-robot collaboration.
  • Extending the hybrid controller to handle additional force axes or variable stiffness could broaden the range of gentle tasks.

Load-bearing premise

Repurposing open-source robot manipulation trajectories generates diverse, aligned vision-tactile-language tasks that support training of effective closed-loop force-aware policies.

What would settle it

An experiment in which the trained model receives gentle language instructions on force-sensitive tasks yet either task success falls sharply or average grip force shows no significant reduction compared to non-gentle baselines.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.27886 by Junjie Lai, Qiwei Wu, Renjing Xu, Rui Zhang, Tao Li, Weihua Zhang, Xin Xiang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Overview of the proposed framework. Motivation: Current vision–language–action (VLA) systems and robotic arm–gripper setups based on synthetic data lack force feedback mechanisms, causing learned policies to frequently damage objects during manipulation. Tabero: We present a high-fidelity multimodal simulation platform integrating Isaac Lab with advanced tactile simulation. Our pipeline enables the re-coll… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Overview of the High-Fidelity Multimodal Data Gen￾eration Pipeline. We take open-source trajectories and task setups originally developed for other platforms, such as MuJoCo, and replay them in our Tabero system. Tabero produces high-quality, temporally aligned data across multiple modalities, including vi￾sion, touch, and robot proprioception. Leveraging the GPU-accelerated parallel rendering capa￾bilitie… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Tabero-VTLA system overview. VTLA system: tactile inputs are encoded by specialized modules and fused with vision and language. Real-time force feedback system: the policy predicts force-position commands, which a decoupled low-level controller tracks to achieve compliant interaction. 3.6. Metrics Beyond Success Rate While existing evaluation protocols for robotic foundation models typically rely solely on… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Tabero Simulation Platform. Tabero replicates the LIBERO task environments, enables data reuse, enhances the visual fidelity of simulated data, and makes it possible to obtain high-quality tactile modalities. To address this limitation, we introduce a set of process￾aware metrics that quantify the quality of physical inter￾action during task execution: Maximum Transient Grip Force (MG). The average of the … view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Force Distribution Across Different Task Suites and Force Control Modes. The force distribution charts show the applied forces under various control modes across different task suites. ”Binary” represents the binarized control commands ap￾plied by a non-tactile gripper during tasks. ”100%”, ”25%”, and ”10%” indicate the force distributions when using a tactile gripper under different force settings. The fo… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Ablation study on gripper force control. GF stands for gripper force. In Tabero Object task 1, the predicted force is shown in blue and the measured force in red: (a) 100% force, (b) 25% force, (c) 25% force without feedforward term, and (d) 25% force without admittance control. Slip stands for object dropping. 4.4. Ablation and Comparison of VTLA To compare and conduct ablation experiments on different ta… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Tactile sensing is essential for robots to achieve human-like gentle manipulation. However, existing Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models struggle to exploit tactile feedback for gentle manipulation due to scarce aligned vision-tactile-language data and the lack of effective closed-loop force feedback mechanisms. To address these challenges, we introduce Tabero, a benchmark and model suite for gentle, language-conditioned robotic manipulation that demands fine-grained contact force perception. First, the Tabero benchmark addresses the scarcity of tactile data by presenting a data-efficient pipeline that repurposes open-source robot manipulation trajectories to generate diverse vision-tactile-language tasks, and establishes a multidimensional evaluation protocol that measures task success alongside physical interaction quality. Second, we propose Tabero-VTLA, an architecture with a decoupled force-position command interface; the resulting force-position commands are executed by a fixed hybrid controller to enable real-time, force-aware manipulation. Evaluated on Tabero, our model maintains high task success while reducing average grip force by over 70\% under gentle instructions, demonstrating its ability to modulate interaction forces based on multimodal experience. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/NathanWu7/Tabero.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper introduces the Tabero benchmark for language-conditioned gentle robotic manipulation, which repurposes open-source trajectories into aligned vision-tactile-language tasks, and proposes the Tabero-VTLA model with a decoupled force-position command interface executed by a fixed hybrid controller. The central empirical claim is that the model achieves high task success rates while reducing average grip force by over 70% under gentle instructions, showing effective modulation of interaction forces from multimodal inputs.

Significance. If the performance claims are substantiated with proper controls, the work could meaningfully advance VLA models toward force-aware manipulation by addressing data scarcity through repurposing and enabling closed-loop tactile feedback; the public code release is a clear strength for reproducibility.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim of >70% grip-force reduction under gentle instructions is stated without any baselines, error bars, dataset sizes, statistical tests, or exclusion criteria, which is load-bearing for assessing whether the empirical outcome supports the multimodal closed-loop contribution.
  2. [Methods (data generation pipeline)] Data pipeline description: no quantitative validation is provided for tactile signal diversity, force variance across generated tasks, or correlation between language instructions and contact forces, leaving open whether the observed reduction arises from learned use of tactile feedback or from task selection and the fixed hybrid controller.
  3. [Experiments] Experimental evaluation: the manuscript reports no modality ablations (e.g., vision+language only versus full VTLA) or force-distribution histograms that would confirm the tactile channel supplies actionable information distinct from position commands for the force-modulation result.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract would benefit from a concise statement of the number of tasks, trajectories, and evaluation episodes to contextualize the 70% figure.
  2. [Model architecture] Notation for the decoupled force-position interface could be clarified with a diagram or pseudocode in the model section.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions we will make to the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim of >70% grip-force reduction under gentle instructions is stated without any baselines, error bars, dataset sizes, statistical tests, or exclusion criteria, which is load-bearing for assessing whether the empirical outcome supports the multimodal closed-loop contribution.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract would be strengthened by including supporting details from the experiments. In the revision we will update the abstract to reference the specific baselines, report error bars and dataset sizes, and note the statistical tests used to substantiate the force-reduction result. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Methods (data generation pipeline)] Data pipeline description: no quantitative validation is provided for tactile signal diversity, force variance across generated tasks, or correlation between language instructions and contact forces, leaving open whether the observed reduction arises from learned use of tactile feedback or from task selection and the fixed hybrid controller.

    Authors: The pipeline reuses existing trajectories while attempting to preserve contact-force characteristics. We acknowledge that explicit quantitative validation would help rule out alternative explanations. We will add analyses of tactile-signal diversity, force variance across tasks, and correlation between language instructions and measured contact forces in the revised methods section. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Experiments] Experimental evaluation: the manuscript reports no modality ablations (e.g., vision+language only versus full VTLA) or force-distribution histograms that would confirm the tactile channel supplies actionable information distinct from position commands for the force-modulation result.

    Authors: Modality ablations and force-distribution histograms would provide clearer evidence that the tactile channel contributes distinct information. We will add these analyses, including a vision+language-only ablation and force histograms, to the experimental evaluation in the revised manuscript. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: empirical claims rest on evaluation, not derivation

full rationale

The manuscript presents a benchmark construction pipeline and a model architecture whose performance (task success + 70% grip-force reduction) is reported as an empirical outcome on the generated Tabero tasks. No equations, uniqueness theorems, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or self-citation load-bearing steps appear in the provided text. The data-generation and controller-interface choices are described as design decisions whose validity is tested by downstream metrics rather than assumed by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

No free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are mentioned in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5758 in / 1045 out tokens · 27782 ms · 2026-06-29T12:25:21.610929+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

18 extracted references · 14 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    doi: 10.1109/tro.2025.3547267

    ISSN 1941-0468. doi: 10.1109/tro.2025.3547267. Bi, J., Ma, K. Y ., Hao, C., Shou, M. Z., and Soh, H. Vla- touch: Enhancing vision-language-action models with dual-level tactile feedback.CoRR, abs/2507.17294,

    work page doi:10.1109/tro.2025.3547267 1941

  2. [2]

    RoboTwin 2.0: A Scalable Data Generator and Benchmark with Strong Domain Randomization for Robust Bimanual Robotic Manipulation

    Black, K., Brown, N., Darpinian, J., Dhabalia, K., Driess, D., Esmail, A., Equi, M. R., Finn, C., Fusai, N., Galliker, M. Y ., Ghosh, D., Groom, L., Hausman, K., ichter, b., Jakubczak, S., Jones, T., Ke, L., LeBlanc, D., Levine, S., Li-Bell, A., Mothukuri, M., Nair, S., Pertsch, K., Ren, A. Z., Shi, L. X., Smith, L., Springenberg, J. T., Stachowicz, K., T...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.15607/rss.2025.xxi.010 2025

  3. [3]

    Tacumi: A multi-modal uni- versal manipulation interface for contact-rich tasks,

    Cheng, T., Chen, K., Chen, L., Zhang, L., Zhang, Y ., Ling, Y ., Hamad, M., Bing, Z., Wu, F., Sharma, K., and Knoll, A. Tacumi: A multi-modal universal manipulation in- terface for contact-rich tasks.CoRR, abs/2601.14550,

    work page arXiv

  4. [4]

    Omnivtla: Vision-tactile-language-action model with semantic-aligned tactile sensing.arXivpreprintarXiv:2508.08706, 2025

    Cheng, Z., Zhang, Y ., Zhang, W., Li, H., Wang, K., Song, L., and Zhang, H. Omnivtla: Vision-tactile-language-action model with semantic-aligned tactile sensing.CoRR, abs/2508.08706,

    work page arXiv

  5. [5]

    Tla: Tactile-language-action model for contact- rich manipulation.CoRR, abs/2503.08548,

    Hao, P., Zhang, C., Li, D., Cao, X., Hao, X., Cui, S., and Wang, S. Tla: Tactile-language-action model for contact- rich manipulation.CoRR, abs/2503.08548,

    work page arXiv

  6. [6]

    Tactile-vla: unlocking vision-language- action model’s physical knowledge for tactile generalization.arXivpreprintarXiv:2507.09160, 2025

    Huang, J., Wang, S., Lin, F., Hu, Y ., Wen, C., and Gao, Y . Tactile-vla: Unlocking vision-language-action model’s physical knowledge for tactile generalization.CoRR, abs/2507.09160,

    work page arXiv

  7. [7]

    Johnson, M. K. and Adelson, E. H. Retrographic sensing for the measurement of surface texture and shape.2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 1070–1077,

    2009

  8. [8]

    Rdt-1b: a diffusion foundation model for bimanual manipulation

    Liu, S., Wu, L., Li, B., Tan, H., Chen, H., Wang, Z., Xu, K., Su, H., and Zhu, J. Rdt-1b: a diffusion foundation model for bimanual manipulation. In Yue, Y ., Garg, A., Peng, N., Sha, F., and Yu, R. (eds.),International Conference on Learning Representations, volume 2025, pp. 29982– 30009,

    2025

  9. [9]

    Mu, Y ., Chen, T., Chen, Z., Peng, S., Lan, Z., Gao, Z., Liang, Z., Yu, Q., Zou, Y ., Xu, M., Lin, L., Xie, Z., Ding, M., and Luo, P

    doi: 10.1109/LRA.2022.3180108. Mu, Y ., Chen, T., Chen, Z., Peng, S., Lan, Z., Gao, Z., Liang, Z., Yu, Q., Zou, Y ., Xu, M., Lin, L., Xie, Z., Ding, M., and Luo, P. Robotwin: Dual-arm robot benchmark with generative digital twins. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 27649–27660, June

    work page doi:10.1109/lra.2022.3180108 2022

  10. [10]

    K., Hoffmann, M., and Mikolajczyk, K

    Nazarczuk, M., Stepanova, K., Behrens, J. K., Hoffmann, M., and Mikolajczyk, K. Muble: Mujoco and blender simulation environment and benchmark for task planning in robot manipulation.CoRR, abs/2503.02834,

    work page arXiv

  11. [11]

    NVIDIA, Bjorck, J., Casta˜neda, F., Cherniadev, N., Da, X., Ding, R., Fan, L. J., Fang, Y ., Fox, D., Hu, F., Huang, S., Jang, J., Jiang, Z., Kautz, J., Kundalia, K., Lao, L., Li, Z., Lin, Z., Lin, K., Liu, G., Llontop, E., Magne, L., Mandlekar, A., Narayan, A., Nasiriany, S., Reed, S., Tan, Y . L., Wang, G., Wang, Z., Wang, J., Wang, Q., Xiang, J., Xie, ...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  12. [12]

    Si, Z., Zhang, G., Ben, Q., Romero, B., Xian, Z., Liu, C., and Gan, C

    doi: 10.1109/ LRA.2022.3142412. Si, Z., Zhang, G., Ben, Q., Romero, B., Xian, Z., Liu, C., and Gan, C. Difftactile: A physics-based differen- tiable tactile simulator for contact-rich robotic manipula- tion. In Kim, B., Yue, Y ., Chaudhuri, S., Fragkiadaki, K., Khan, M., and Sun, Y . (eds.),International Conference on Learning Representations, volume 2024...

    work page arXiv 2022

  13. [13]

    doi: 10.1109/lra.2022.3146945

    ISSN 2377-3774. doi: 10.1109/lra.2022.3146945. Wu, L., Yu, C., Ren, J., Chen, L., Jiang, Y ., Huang, R., Gu, G., and Li, H. Freetacman: Robot-free visuo-tactile data collection system for contact-rich manipulation.CoRR, abs/2506.01941,

    work page doi:10.1109/lra.2022.3146945 2022

  14. [14]

    doi: 10.3390/s17122762

    ISSN 1424-8220. doi: 10.3390/s17122762. Zhang, C., Hao, P., Cao, X., Hao, X., Cui, S., and Wang, S. Vtla: Vision-tactile-language-action model with preference learning for insertion manipulation.CoRR, abs/2505.09577, 2025a. Zhang, Z., Xu, H., Yang, Z., Yue, C., Lin, Z., Gao, H.-a., Wang, Z., and Zhao, H. Elucidating the design space of torque-aware vision...

    work page doi:10.3390/s17122762 2025

  15. [15]

    Habas, A

    ISBN 979-8- 3315-4139-2. doi: 10.1109/ICRA55743.2025.11128816. Zhao, Y ., Qian, K., Duan, B., and Luo, S. Fots: A fast optical tactile simulator for sim2real learning of tactile- motor robot manipulation skills.IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 9(6):5647–5654,

    work page doi:10.1109/icra55743.2025.11128816 2025

  16. [16]

    Zhu, Y ., Wong, J., Mandlekar, A., and Mart´ın-Mart´ın, R

    doi: 10.1109/ LRA.2024.3396665. Zhu, Y ., Wong, J., Mandlekar, A., and Mart´ın-Mart´ın, R. robosuite: A modular simulation framework and bench- mark for robot learning.CoRR, abs/2009.12293,

    work page arXiv 2024

  17. [17]

    Hyperparameters The following table (Tab.5, Tab.6) presents some hyperparameters of the Tabero VTLA

    10 Tabero: Learning Gentle Manipulation with Closed-Loop Force Feedback from Vision, Touch, and Language A. Hyperparameters The following table (Tab.5, Tab.6) presents some hyperparameters of the Tabero VTLA. Table 5.Common training hyperparameters for Tabero. PARAMETERVALUE MODEL FAMILY PI0 (JAX) ACTION DIM(PADDED) 32 EFFECTIVE ACTION DIM(SEMANTIC) 13 TA...

    2048

  18. [18]

    11 Tabero: Learning Gentle Manipulation with Closed-Loop Force Feedback from Vision, Touch, and Language Table 8.Hyperparameters of TCN tactile tokenizer PARAMETERVALUE/ CONSTRAINT EXPERT WIDTH(W)PREFIX: 2048; NUM LAYERS2 KERNEL SIZE3 (CAUSAL) HISTORY(H) 8 ACTIVATION SWISH INPUT DIM11×9×2×9×2 = 3564 Table 9.Controller parameters (Hybrid+Tactile configurat...

    2048