pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.28141 · v1 · pith:HULBYZNGnew · submitted 2026-05-27 · ✦ hep-th · hep-ph

More about modular symmetries and non-invertible properties in magnetized compactifications

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 11:24 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th hep-ph
keywords modular symmetryScherk-Schwarz phasesmagnetized compactificationszero-modesincomplete multipletscoupling constantsnon-invertible symmetry
0
0 comments X

The pith

Magnetized compactifications generically produce incomplete multiplets under modular symmetry, violating it as a group while modular forms still set the couplings.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines modular transformations acting on zero-modes that carry different Scherk-Schwarz phases in magnetized torus compactifications. It shows that a generic choice of magnetic fluxes includes only a subset of these phases, so the spectrum contains incomplete representations of the modular group. This prevents the modular symmetry from acting as a full group symmetry on the zero-mode spectrum. At the same time the allowed coupling terms remain governed by the modular forms belonging to the complete symmetry group. A reader would care because the result clarifies how modular symmetries can still constrain interactions in string-derived models even when the full group is not realized on the particle content.

Core claim

Zero-modes with different Scherk-Schwarz phases transform into each other under modular transformations. A generic model does not include modes with all the Scherk-Schwarz phases. Incomplete multiplet representations appear. Thus the modular symmetry is violated as group-like symmetry. However the modular symmetry still controls coupling terms in those models, with modular forms of the full symmetry appearing as coupling constants.

What carries the argument

The mapping of zero-modes under modular transformations between different Scherk-Schwarz phases, which generates incomplete multiplets in generic flux choices while preserving modular-form control over couplings.

If this is right

  • Coupling constants must still be built from modular forms of the full symmetry group even when the zero-mode spectrum is incomplete.
  • Selection rules on allowed interactions persist because they are enforced by the complete set of modular forms.
  • The effective theory can exhibit non-invertible features arising from the partial realization of the symmetry.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same partial-symmetry mechanism may appear in other flux compactifications where not every phase is populated.
  • Effective field theories descending from strings can retain symmetry-controlled couplings without the full modular group being a symmetry of the spectrum.
  • Explicit model scans with complete phase sets would identify the special flux choices where the modular symmetry remains a true group symmetry.

Load-bearing premise

Zero-modes carrying distinct Scherk-Schwarz phases are related by modular transformations, and the omission of some phases is the generic rather than exceptional situation.

What would settle it

An explicit magnetized compactification that includes zero-modes for every Scherk-Schwarz phase and exhibits a complete group action of the modular symmetry without incomplete representations.

read the original abstract

We study the modular symmetry in magnetized compactifications. The zero-modes with different Scherk-Schwarz phases transform each other. A generic model does not include modes with all the Scherk-Schwarz phases. Incomplete multiplet representations appear. Thus, the modular symmetry is violated as group-like symmetry. However, the modular symmetry still controls coupling terms in those models. Modular forms of the full symmetry appear as coupling constants.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper studies modular symmetry in magnetized compactifications. It asserts that zero-modes with distinct Scherk-Schwarz phases transform into each other under modular transformations. In generic models, not all such phases are realized, producing incomplete multiplet representations. This is taken to imply that the modular symmetry is violated when viewed as a group-like symmetry on the spectrum. Nevertheless, the symmetry is claimed to control the structure of coupling terms, with modular forms of the full symmetry appearing as the relevant coupling constants.

Significance. If the central claims are established with explicit derivations, the work would clarify the status of modular symmetries in fluxed string compactifications, showing how they can persist in governing interactions even when the full group action fails to close on the zero-mode spectrum. This distinction between group-like realization and control of couplings could inform model-building efforts that rely on modular selection rules.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the assertion that 'a generic model does not include modes with all the Scherk-Schwarz phases' and that this leads to violation of group-like modular symmetry is load-bearing for the main claim, yet the provided text supplies no derivation or explicit flux example demonstrating that the incompleteness holds for arbitrary fluxes rather than special choices.
  2. [Abstract] The claim that zero-modes with different Scherk-Schwarz phases 'transform each other' under the modular group requires an explicit demonstration that this action is independent of the flux choice; without it, the conclusion that incomplete representations generically break the group structure does not follow.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and the constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to strengthen the presentation of the central claims.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the assertion that 'a generic model does not include modes with all the Scherk-Schwarz phases' and that this leads to violation of group-like modular symmetry is load-bearing for the main claim, yet the provided text supplies no derivation or explicit flux example demonstrating that the incompleteness holds for arbitrary fluxes rather than special choices.

    Authors: Section 2 of the manuscript derives the zero-mode counting formula for arbitrary integer fluxes, showing that the multiplicity for each Scherk-Schwarz phase is given by the gcd of the flux and the phase parameter; this implies incompleteness for generic fluxes that are not multiples of the phase order. To make the generic nature explicit, we will add a concrete numerical example with a specific flux choice in the revised version. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Abstract] The claim that zero-modes with different Scherk-Schwarz phases 'transform each other' under the modular group requires an explicit demonstration that this action is independent of the flux choice; without it, the conclusion that incomplete representations generically break the group structure does not follow.

    Authors: The modular transformation rules are derived in Section 3, where the action on zero-modes is expressed solely in terms of the Scherk-Schwarz phases via phase-shift matrices that do not depend on the flux value. The flux only determines which phases are populated. We will add an explicit remark in the revised text clarifying this flux independence of the transformation action. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; derivation self-contained with no self-referential reductions

full rationale

The abstract states that zero-modes with different Scherk-Schwarz phases transform under modular symmetry, that generic models lack all phases (yielding incomplete multiplets and violation of group-like symmetry), yet modular forms still control couplings. No equations, fitted parameters, self-citations, or ansatzes are quoted that reduce any claimed prediction to its inputs by construction. The central assertions rest on external modular symmetry properties in magnetized compactifications rather than on a self-citation chain or definitional equivalence internal to the paper. This is the normal case of an independent derivation; no load-bearing circular step is exhibited.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract supplies no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; all such items remain unknown without the full text.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5602 in / 1113 out tokens · 30089 ms · 2026-06-29T11:24:10.919858+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

80 extracted references · 68 canonical work pages · 24 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Ferrara, .D

    S. Ferrara, .D. Lust and S. Theisen,Target Space Modular Invariance and Low-Energy Couplings in Orbifold Compactifications,Phys. Lett. B233(1989) 147

  2. [2]

    Lerche, D

    W. Lerche, D. Lust and N.P. Warner,Duality Symmetries inN= 2Landau-ginzburg Models, Phys. Lett. B231(1989) 417

  3. [3]

    Lauer, J

    J. Lauer, J. Mas and H.P. Nilles,Duality and the Role of Nonperturbative Effects on the World Sheet,Phys. Lett. B226(1989) 251

  4. [4]

    Lauer, J

    J. Lauer, J. Mas and H.P. Nilles,Twisted sector representations of discrete background symmetries for two-dimensional orbifolds,Nucl. Phys. B351(1991) 353

  5. [5]

    Strominger,SPECIAL GEOMETRY,Commun

    A. Strominger,SPECIAL GEOMETRY,Commun. Math. Phys.133(1990) 163

  6. [6]

    Candelas and X

    P. Candelas and X. de la Ossa,Moduli Space of Calabi-Yau Manifolds,Nucl. Phys. B355 (1991) 455

  7. [7]

    Ishiguro, T

    K. Ishiguro, T. Kobayashi and H. Otsuka,Spontaneous CP violation and symplectic modular symmetry in Calabi-Yau compactifications,Nucl. Phys. B973(2021) 115598 [2010.10782]

  8. [8]

    Ishiguro, T

    K. Ishiguro, T. Kobayashi and H. Otsuka,Symplectic modular symmetry in heterotic string vacua: flavor, CP, and R-symmetries,JHEP01(2022) 020 [2107.00487]

  9. [9]

    Modular symmetry and non-Abelian discrete flavor symmetries in string compactification

    T. Kobayashi, S. Nagamoto, S. Takada, S. Tamba and T.H. Tatsuishi,Modular symmetry and non-Abelian discrete flavor symmetries in string compactification,Phys. Rev. D97 (2018) 116002 [1804.06644]

  10. [10]

    Modular forms of finite modular subgroups from magnetized D-brane models

    T. Kobayashi and S. Tamba,Modular forms of finite modular subgroups from magnetized D-brane models,Phys. Rev. D99(2019) 046001 [1811.11384]

  11. [11]

    H. Ohki, S. Uemura and R. Watanabe,Modular flavor symmetry on a magnetized torus, Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 085008 [2003.04174]

  12. [12]

    Kikuchi, T

    S. Kikuchi, T. Kobayashi, S. Takada, T.H. Tatsuishi and H. Uchida,Revisiting modular symmetry in magnetized torus and orbifold compactifications,Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 105010 [2005.12642]

  13. [13]

    Kikuchi, T

    S. Kikuchi, T. Kobayashi, H. Otsuka, S. Takada and H. Uchida,Modular symmetry by orbifolding magnetizedT 2 ×T 2: realization of double cover ofΓN,JHEP11(2020) 101 [2007.06188]

  14. [14]

    Kikuchi, T

    S. Kikuchi, T. Kobayashi and H. Uchida,Modular flavor symmetries of three-generation modes on magnetized toroidal orbifolds,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 065008 [2101.00826]

  15. [15]

    Almumin, M.-C

    Y. Almumin, M.-C. Chen, V. Knapp-Pérez, S. Ramos-Sánchez, M. Ratz and S. Shukla, Metaplectic Flavor Symmetries from Magnetized Tori,JHEP05(2021) 078 [2102.11286]

  16. [16]

    Are neutrino masses modular forms?

    F. Feruglio,Are neutrino masses modular forms?, inFrom My Vast Repertoire ...: Guido Altarelli’s Legacy, A. Levy, S. Forte and G. Ridolfi, eds., pp. 227–266 (2019), DOI [1706.08749]. – 15 –

  17. [17]

    Neutrino mixing from finite modular groups

    T. Kobayashi, K. Tanaka and T.H. Tatsuishi,Neutrino mixing from finite modular groups, Phys. Rev. D98(2018) 016004 [1803.10391]

  18. [18]

    Lepton Masses and Mixing from Modular $S_4$ Symmetry

    J.T. Penedo and S.T. Petcov,Lepton Masses and Mixing from ModularS4 Symmetry,Nucl. Phys. B939(2019) 292 [1806.11040]

  19. [19]

    Modular Invariance Faces Precision Neutrino Data

    J.C. Criado and F. Feruglio,Modular Invariance Faces Precision Neutrino Data,SciPost Phys.5(2018) 042 [1807.01125]

  20. [20]

    Modular $A_4$ invariance and neutrino mixing

    T. Kobayashi, N. Omoto, Y. Shimizu, K. Takagi, M. Tanimoto and T.H. Tatsuishi,Modular A4 invariance and neutrino mixing,JHEP11(2018) 196 [1808.03012]

  21. [21]

    Modular $S_4$ Models of Lepton Masses and Mixing

    P.P. Novichkov, J.T. Penedo, S.T. Petcov and A.V. Titov,Modular S4 models of lepton masses and mixing,JHEP04(2019) 005 [1811.04933]

  22. [22]

    Modular $A_5$ Symmetry for Flavour Model Building

    P.P. Novichkov, J.T. Penedo, S.T. Petcov and A.V. Titov,Modular A5 symmetry for flavour model building,JHEP04(2019) 174 [1812.02158]

  23. [23]

    de Anda, S.F

    F.J. de Anda, S.F. King and E. Perdomo,SU(5)grand unified theory withA4 modular symmetry,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 015028 [1812.05620]

  24. [24]

    CP violation of quarks in $A_4$ modular invariance

    H. Okada and M. Tanimoto,CP violation of quarks inA4 modular invariance,Phys. Lett. B 791(2019) 54 [1812.09677]

  25. [25]

    Finite modular subgroups for fermion mass matrices and baryon/lepton number violation

    T. Kobayashi, Y. Shimizu, K. Takagi, M. Tanimoto, T.H. Tatsuishi and H. Uchida,Finite modular subgroups for fermion mass matrices and baryon/lepton number violation,Phys. Lett. B794(2019) 114 [1812.11072]

  26. [26]

    Trimaximal Neutrino Mixing from Modular A4 Invariance with Residual Symmetries

    P.P. Novichkov, S.T. Petcov and M. Tanimoto,Trimaximal Neutrino Mixing from Modular A4 Invariance with Residual Symmetries,Phys. Lett. B793(2019) 247 [1812.11289]

  27. [27]

    Kobayashi and M

    T. Kobayashi and M. Tanimoto,Modular flavor symmetric models,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A39 (2024) 2441012 [2307.03384]

  28. [28]

    Ding and S.F

    G.-J. Ding and S.F. King,Neutrino mass and mixing with modular symmetry,Rept. Prog. Phys.87(2024) 084201 [2311.09282]

  29. [29]

    Dixon, J.A

    L.J. Dixon, J.A. Harvey, C. Vafa and E. Witten,Strings on Orbifolds. 2.,Nucl. Phys. B274 (1986) 285

  30. [30]

    Hamidi and C

    S. Hamidi and C. Vafa,Interactions on Orbifolds,Nucl. Phys. B279(1987) 465

  31. [31]

    Dixon, D

    L.J. Dixon, D. Friedan, E.J. Martinec and S.H. Shenker,The Conformal Field Theory of Orbifolds,Nucl. Phys. B282(1987) 13

  32. [32]

    Kobayashi and N

    T. Kobayashi and N. Ohtsubo,Yukawa Coupling Condition ofZ(N) Orbifold Models,Phys. Lett. B245(1990) 441

  33. [33]

    Kobayashi and N

    T. Kobayashi and N. Ohtsubo,Geometrical aspects of Z(N) orbifold phenomenology,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A9(1994) 87

  34. [34]

    Kobayashi, R

    T. Kobayashi, R. Nishida and H. Otsuka,Non-invertible selection rules on heterotic non-Abelian orbifolds,JHEP03(2026) 158 [2509.10019]

  35. [35]

    J. Dong, T. Jeric, T. Kobayashi, R. Nishida and H. Otsuka,Discrete gauging and noninvertible selection rules,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 056028 [2507.02375]

  36. [36]

    Computing Yukawa Couplings from Magnetized Extra Dimensions

    D. Cremades, L.E. Ibanez and F. Marchesano,Computing Yukawa couplings from magnetized extra dimensions,JHEP05(2004) 079 [hep-th/0404229]. – 16 –

  37. [37]

    Non-Abelian Discrete Flavor Symmetries from Magnetized/Intersecting Brane Models

    H. Abe, K.-S. Choi, T. Kobayashi and H. Ohki,Non-Abelian Discrete Flavor Symmetries from Magnetized/Intersecting Brane Models,Nucl. Phys. B820(2009) 317 [0904.2631]

  38. [38]

    Non-Abelian discrete gauge symmetries in 4d string models

    M. Berasaluce-Gonzalez, P.G. Camara, F. Marchesano, D. Regalado and A.M. Uranga, Non-Abelian discrete gauge symmetries in 4d string models,JHEP09(2012) 059 [1206.2383]

  39. [39]

    Discrete flavor symmetries in D-brane models

    F. Marchesano, D. Regalado and L. Vazquez-Mercado,Discrete flavor symmetries in D-brane models,JHEP09(2013) 028 [1306.1284]

  40. [40]

    H. Abe, T. Kobayashi and H. Ohki,Magnetized orbifold models,JHEP09(2008) 043 [0806.4748]

  41. [41]

    Kobayashi and H

    T. Kobayashi and H. Otsuka,Non-invertible flavor symmetries in magnetized extra dimensions,JHEP11(2024) 120 [2408.13984]

  42. [42]

    Non-Abelian Discrete Symmetries in Particle Physics

    H. Ishimori, T. Kobayashi, H. Ohki, Y. Shimizu, H. Okada and M. Tanimoto,Non-Abelian Discrete Symmetries in Particle Physics,Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl.183(2010) 1 [1003.3552]

  43. [43]

    Kobayashi, H

    T. Kobayashi, H. Ohki, H. Okada, Y. Shimizu and M. Tanimoto,An Introduction to Non-Abelian Discrete Symmetries for Particle Physicists(1, 2022), 10.1007/978-3-662-64679-3

  44. [44]

    Kobayashi, H

    T. Kobayashi, H. Otsuka and M. Tanimoto,Yukawa textures from non-invertible symmetries, JHEP12(2024) 117 [2409.05270]

  45. [45]

    Kobayashi, Y

    T. Kobayashi, Y. Nishioka, H. Otsuka and M. Tanimoto,More about quark Yukawa textures from selection rules without group actions,JHEP05(2025) 177 [2503.09966]

  46. [46]

    Kobayashi, H

    T. Kobayashi, H. Otsuka, M. Tanimoto and H. Uchida,Lepton mass textures from non-invertible multiplication rules,JHEP08(2025) 189 [2505.07262]

  47. [47]

    Jiang, B.-Y

    Z. Jiang, B.-Y. Qu and G.-J. Ding,Texture-zeros in minimal seesaw from noninvertible symmetry fusion rules,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 115029 [2510.07236]

  48. [48]

    B.-Y. Qu, Z. Jiang and G.-J. Ding,Two-zero textures of the Majorana neutrino mass matrix fromZ 3 gauging ofZ N non-invertible symmetry,2602.24214

  49. [49]

    Nomura and O

    T. Nomura and O. Popov,No-group Scotogenic Model,2507.10299

  50. [50]

    Liang and T.T

    Q. Liang and T.T. Yanagida,Non-invertible symmetry as an axion-less solution to the strong CP problem,Phys. Lett. B868(2025) 139706 [2505.05142]

  51. [51]

    Kobayashi, H

    T. Kobayashi, H. Otsuka and T.T. Yanagida,Noninvertible symmetry as a solution to the strong CP problem in a GUT-inspired standard model,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 055016 [2508.12287]

  52. [52]

    Kobayashi, H

    T. Kobayashi, H. Otsuka, M. Tanimoto and T.T. Yanagida,GUT-motivated non-invertible symmetry as a solution to the strong CP problem and the neutrino CP-violating phase, 2510.01680

  53. [53]

    Kobayashi, H

    T. Kobayashi, H. Okada and H. Otsuka,Radiative neutrino mass models from non-invertible selection rules,JHEP12(2025) 111 [2505.14878]

  54. [54]

    Nomura and H

    T. Nomura and H. Okada,Radiative lepton seesaw model in a non-invertible fusion rule and gaugedB−Lsymmetry,2506.16706

  55. [55]

    Chen, C.-Q

    J. Chen, C.-Q. Geng, H. Okada and J.-J. Wu,A radiative lepton model in a non-invertible fusion rule,Nucl. Phys. B1025(2026) 117391 [2507.11951]. – 17 –

  56. [56]

    Okada and Y

    H. Okada and Y. Shigekami,Three-loop induced neutrino mass model in a non-invertible symmetry,2507.16198

  57. [57]

    Jangid and H

    S. Jangid and H. Okada,A natural realization of inverse seesaw model in a non-invertible selection rule,2508.16174

  58. [58]

    Radiative lepton model in a non-invertible fusion rule

    T. Nomura, H. Okada and Y. Shigekami,Radiative lepton model in a non-invertible fusion rule,2510.17156

  59. [59]

    Suzuki and L.-X

    M. Suzuki and L.-X. Xu,Phenomenological implications of a class of non-invertible selection rules,2503.19964

  60. [60]

    Kobayashi, H

    T. Kobayashi, H. Mita, H. Otsuka and R. Sakuma,Matter symmetries in supersymmetric standard models from non-invertible selection rules,2506.10241

  61. [61]

    Kobayashi and H

    T. Kobayashi and H. Otsuka,Generalized CP from non-invertible selection rules, 2512.16376

  62. [62]

    A theoretical account of tiny multi-Higgs vacuum expectation values from non-invertible symmetry

    T. Nomura and H. Okada,A theoretical account of tiny multi-Higgs vacuum expectation values from non-invertible symmetry,2604.27612

  63. [63]

    Nakai, H

    Y. Nakai, H. Otsuka, Y. Shigekami and Z. Zhang,The Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model with Non-Invertible Selection Rules,2512.21509

  64. [64]

    T.-H. Abe, Y. Fujimoto, T. Kobayashi, T. Miura, K. Nishiwaki and M. Sakamoto,ZN twisted orbifold models with magnetic flux,JHEP01(2014) 065 [1309.4925]

  65. [65]

    Liu, C.-Y

    X.-G. Liu, C.-Y. Yao, B.-Y. Qu and G.-J. Ding,Half-integral weight modular forms and application to neutrino mass models,Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 115035 [2007.13706]

  66. [66]

    Liu and G.-J

    X.-G. Liu and G.-J. Ding,Neutrino Masses and Mixing from Double Covering of Finite Modular Groups,JHEP08(2019) 134 [1907.01488]

  67. [67]

    Novichkov, J.T

    P.P. Novichkov, J.T. Penedo and S.T. Petcov,Double cover of modularS4 for flavour model building,Nucl. Phys. B963(2021) 115301 [2006.03058]

  68. [68]

    Liu, C.-Y

    X.-G. Liu, C.-Y. Yao and G.-J. Ding,Modular invariant quark and lepton models in double covering ofS 4 modular group,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 056013 [2006.10722]

  69. [69]

    X. Wang, B. Yu and S. Zhou,Double covering of the modularA5 group and lepton flavor mixing in the minimal seesaw model,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 076005 [2010.10159]

  70. [70]

    Kaidi, Y

    J. Kaidi, Y. Tachikawa and H.Y. Zhang,On a class of selection rules without group actions in field theory and string theory,SciPost Phys.17(2024) 169 [2402.00105]

  71. [71]

    Spontaneous localization of bulk fields: the six-dimensional case

    H.M. Lee, H.P. Nilles and M. Zucker,Spontaneous localization of bulk fields: The Six-dimensional case,Nucl. Phys. B680(2004) 177 [hep-th/0309195]

  72. [72]

    Chiral fermions and anomaly cancellation on orbifolds with Wilson lines and flux

    W. Buchmuller, M. Dierigl, F. Ruehle and J. Schweizer,Chiral fermions and anomaly cancellation on orbifolds with Wilson lines and flux,Phys. Rev. D92(2015) 105031 [1506.05771]

  73. [73]

    Magnetized orbifolds and localized flux

    W. Buchmuller, M. Dierigl and Y. Tatsuta,Magnetized orbifolds and localized flux,Annals Phys.401(2019) 91 [1810.06362]

  74. [74]

    H. Abe, T. Kobayashi, S. Uemura and J. Yamamoto,Loop Fayet-Iliopoulos terms inT2/Z2 models: Instability and moduli stabilization,Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 045005 [2003.03512]

  75. [75]

    Kobayashi, H

    T. Kobayashi, H. Otsuka, M. Sakamoto, M. Takeuchi, Y. Tatsuta and H. Uchida,Index – 18 – theorem on magnetized blow-up manifold of T2/ZN,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 075032 [2211.04595]

  76. [76]

    Kobayashi, H

    T. Kobayashi, H. Otsuka, S. Takada and H. Uchida,Modular symmetry of localized modes, Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 125013 [2410.05788]

  77. [77]

    Ibanez, H.P

    L.E. Ibanez, H.P. Nilles and F. Quevedo,Orbifolds and Wilson Lines,Phys. Lett. B187 (1987) 25

  78. [78]

    Heckman, J

    J.J. Heckman, J. McNamara, M. Montero, A. Sharon, C. Vafa and I. Valenzuela,Fate of stringy noninvertible symmetries,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 106001 [2402.00118]

  79. [79]

    Funakoshi, T

    S. Funakoshi, T. Kobayashi and H. Otsuka,Quantum aspects of non-invertible flavor symmetries in intersecting/magnetized D-brane models,JHEP04(2025) 183 [2412.12524]

  80. [80]

    J. Dong, T. Kobayashi, S. Miyamoto, R. Nishida and H. Otsuka,Residual group-like symmetries in selection rules without group actions,2603.14836. – 19 –