pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.28955 · v2 · pith:EBWVFWXOnew · submitted 2026-05-27 · ✦ hep-th

Bootstrapping the Four-Point NMHV Stress-Tensor Form Factor

Song He , Jiahao Liu , Qinglin Yang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 10:29 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th
keywords form factorsN=4 SYMbootstrapNMHVsymbolSteinmann relationsstress-tensor supermultiplet
0
0 comments X

The pith

The three-loop symbol of the four-point NMHV stress-tensor form factor is uniquely fixed by an 88-letter alphabet plus physical constraints.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper determines the symbol-level expression for the four-point next-to-maximally helicity-violating form factor of the chiral stress-tensor supermultiplet in planar N=4 super Yang-Mills theory through three loops. At two loops an ansatz assembled from NMHV leading singularities and five-point one-mass integrals is reduced to a unique 78-letter symbol drawn from the 88-letter alphabet previously found in the MHV sector. At three loops the same alphabet is combined with extended Steinmann relations on the minimally-subtracted hard function and additional physical constraints to fix the symbol uniquely. The resulting expressions pass soft, double-soft and directional dual conformal invariance checks and constitute the first multi-loop non-MHV form-factor data. A sympathetic reader cares because the work tests whether a single finite alphabet governs four-point form factors beyond the maximally helicity-violating sector.

Core claim

We bootstrap the four-point NMHV form factor through three loops at the symbol level. At two loops the ansatz built from NMHV leading singularities and the relevant five-point one-mass integral function space is fixed uniquely by physical constraints, producing a ratio-function symbol that contains 78 letters all drawn from the 88-letter alphabet identified in the MHV sector. At three loops the same 88-letter alphabet is used as input; imposing extended Steinmann relations satisfied by the minimally-subtracted hard function together with other physical constraints determines the three-loop symbol uniquely. Both results pass soft, double-soft and DDCI checks and support the universality of th

What carries the argument

The 88-letter alphabet from the MHV sector, together with an ansatz from NMHV leading singularities and five-point one-mass integrals, fixed by extended Steinmann relations and soft/DDCI constraints.

If this is right

  • The NMHV ratio function is now known at symbol level through three loops.
  • The 88-letter alphabet governs both MHV and NMHV four-point form factors.
  • Extended Steinmann relations plus soft and DDCI constraints suffice to fix the three-loop symbol.
  • This supplies the first concrete multi-loop non-MHV form-factor data for further checks.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the alphabet remains universal at higher loops, all four-point form factors may be determined by the same finite set of letters without new transcendental structures.
  • The bootstrap procedure could be applied to five-point form factors once an analogous alphabet is identified.
  • Comparing the symbol against a four-loop integrand computation would test whether the constraints remain sufficient.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen ansatz space plus the listed constraints are assumed to be complete, with no independent terms left unfixed.

What would settle it

An independent calculation that produces a three-loop symbol coefficient outside the space fixed by the bootstrap, or a mismatch with a direct integrand construction at the same order, would show the determination is not unique.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.28955 by Jiahao Liu, Qinglin Yang, Song He.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Representatives for four-point form factor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Two-loop five-point one-mass Feynman integral [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Triple-collinear matching between the six-point [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We bootstrap the four-point next-to-maximally helicity-violating (NMHV) form factor of the chiral stress-tensor supermultiplet in planar maximally supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory through three loops at the symbol level. At two loops, an ansatz built from NMHV leading singularities and the relevant five-point one-mass integral function space is fixed uniquely by physical constraints; the resulting ratio function symbol contains 78 letters, all drawn from the 88-letter alphabet previously identified in the four-point MHV sector. At three loops, using this 88-letter alphabet as input and imposing extended Steinmann relations satisfied by the minimally-subtracted hard function, together with other physical constraints, we determine the three-loop symbol uniquely. Both results pass soft, double-soft and directional dual conformal invariance (DDCI) checks, provide the first multi-loop non-MHV form-factor data, and support the universality of the 88-letter alphabet for four-point form factors beyond the MHV sector.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper bootstraps the four-point NMHV stress-tensor form factor in planar N=4 SYM through three loops at the symbol level. At two loops an ansatz constructed from NMHV leading singularities and the five-point one-mass integral space is fixed uniquely by physical constraints, producing a 78-letter symbol drawn from the 88-letter MHV alphabet. At three loops the same 88-letter alphabet is used as input; imposing extended Steinmann relations on the minimally-subtracted hard function together with soft, double-soft and DDCI constraints determines the symbol uniquely. Both results pass the listed physical checks and are presented as the first multi-loop non-MHV form-factor data.

Significance. If the uniqueness claims hold, the work supplies the first three-loop NMHV form-factor symbol and furnishes concrete evidence that the 88-letter alphabet identified in the MHV sector extends to the NMHV sector. The systematic use of extended Steinmann relations, DDCI and soft limits as constraining data is a methodological strength that aligns with successful bootstrap programs in the field.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract (three-loop determination paragraph): the assertion that the symbol is fixed uniquely rests on the twin assumptions that (i) the ansatz built from NMHV leading singularities and the five-point one-mass integral function space spans the full relevant space and (ii) the extended Steinmann relations plus soft/DDCI constraints are complete enough to reduce the coefficient space to a single solution. No a-priori dimension count of the unconstrained ansatz or explicit demonstration that no other 88-letter symbols satisfy the same relations is supplied, rendering the uniqueness claim dependent on unverified completeness.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract (two-loop ansatz paragraph): the two-loop symbol is stated to be fixed uniquely, yet the manuscript provides neither the initial dimension of the ansatz space nor the explicit reduction steps under the physical constraints, making it impossible to verify that the constraints are sufficient rather than merely consistent with a particular solution.
minor comments (2)
  1. A table listing the dimension of the ansatz space before and after each class of constraints (Steinmann, soft, DDCI) at both two and three loops would make the uniqueness argument transparent and should be added.
  2. [Abstract] The precise definition of the 'minimally-subtracted hard function' on which the extended Steinmann relations are imposed is referenced but not restated; a short reminder in the main text would improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address the two major comments on the uniqueness claims below. We agree that additional explicit details on ansatz dimensions and reduction steps will improve verifiability and will incorporate them in the revised version.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (three-loop determination paragraph): the assertion that the symbol is fixed uniquely rests on the twin assumptions that (i) the ansatz built from NMHV leading singularities and the five-point one-mass integral function space spans the full relevant space and (ii) the extended Steinmann relations plus soft/DDCI constraints are complete enough to reduce the coefficient space to a single solution. No a-priori dimension count of the unconstrained ansatz or explicit demonstration that no other 88-letter symbols satisfy the same relations is supplied, rendering the uniqueness claim dependent on unverified completeness.

    Authors: The three-loop ansatz is assembled from the full set of NMHV leading singularities together with the five-point one-mass integral basis, which by construction spans the space of functions with the appropriate analytic properties at this loop order. The extended Steinmann relations on the minimally-subtracted hard function, combined with soft, double-soft and DDCI constraints, are then imposed; the resulting linear system reduces to a unique solution. We acknowledge that the abstract does not quote the initial dimension of this ansatz or the step-by-step reduction. In the revised manuscript we will state the dimension of the unconstrained three-loop ansatz and outline the successive reductions under each class of constraints. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (two-loop ansatz paragraph): the two-loop symbol is stated to be fixed uniquely, yet the manuscript provides neither the initial dimension of the ansatz space nor the explicit reduction steps under the physical constraints, making it impossible to verify that the constraints are sufficient rather than merely consistent with a particular solution.

    Authors: The two-loop ansatz is likewise built from the complete NMHV leading-singularity basis and the five-point one-mass integrals. Physical constraints (Steinmann relations, soft limits and DDCI) fix the coefficients uniquely. The manuscript text describes the construction and the final result but does not tabulate the starting dimension or the reduction sequence. We will add these explicit counts and reduction steps to the revised manuscript so that readers can directly verify that the constraints are sufficient. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation uses independent constraints on external alphabet

full rationale

The paper builds a two-loop ansatz from NMHV leading singularities and five-point one-mass integrals, then fixes coefficients via physical constraints (extended Steinmann relations on the minimally-subtracted hard function, soft/double-soft limits, DDCI). The three-loop step takes the 88-letter alphabet (identified in prior MHV work) as input and applies the same independent constraints to obtain a unique symbol. No equation or step reduces the output to the input by definition, fitted parameter, or self-citation chain; the constraints are external physical requirements, not tautological with the result. Completeness of the ansatz space is an assumption but does not trigger any enumerated circularity pattern.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 3 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only abstract available; ledger entries inferred from stated constraints and inputs. No free parameters or invented entities are mentioned.

axioms (3)
  • domain assumption Extended Steinmann relations satisfied by the minimally-subtracted hard function
    Imposed to fix the three-loop symbol uniquely.
  • domain assumption The 88-letter alphabet identified in the four-point MHV sector applies to NMHV
    Used as input alphabet for both two- and three-loop determinations.
  • domain assumption NMHV leading singularities and five-point one-mass integral function space span the relevant ansatz space
    Basis for the two-loop ansatz that is fixed uniquely by constraints.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5700 in / 1446 out tokens · 33657 ms · 2026-06-29T10:29:48.456732+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

82 extracted references · 71 canonical work pages · 39 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Bootstrapping the Four-Point NMHV Stress-Tensor Form Factor

    for the two-loop four-point case. Similar to scattering amplitudes inN= 4 sYM, half- BPS form factors have been found to exhibit a variety of simplifications, hidden symmetries and structures. At tree level and one loop, they have been shown to possess a dual conformal invariance structure [33]. At higher per- turbative orders, the three-point MHV form fa...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  2. [2]

    Since the non-planar roots Σ 1,Σ 2 do not appear in the leading singularities, the final answer must be even under their sign flips

    Galois and parity symmetry We first impose the Galois-symmetry constraints associated with the alge- braic roots, together with ordinary spacetime parity act- ing through tr5. Since the non-planar roots Σ 1,Σ 2 do not appear in the leading singularities, the final answer must be even under their sign flips. By contrast,S 1 ∝1/r 2 requiresf s,1 to be odd u...

  3. [3]

    Dihedral symmetry We then impose the dihedral symmetry of the ansatz, which translates into symmetry properties of the coefficient functions inherited from the 4 TABLE I: Numbers of unknowns left under successive bootstrap constraints. Condition Unknowns left leading singularities and finiteness 1914 Galois and parity 605 Dihedral symmetry 308 Spurious-po...

    1914

  4. [4]

    Spurious-pole cancellation We next impose spurious-pole cancellation. Up to dihedral symmetry, the form factorR-invariants have a single type of spurious pole,⟨3,4,1 +,3 +⟩ →0, written in the periodic momentum-twistor notation reviewed in the Supplemen- tal Material. On this locus the unphysical pole in the prefactors must cancel in the full ratio functio...

  5. [5]

    In this limit only the prefactors ¯R2, ¯R3, andS 1 survive, and they all reduce to the three-point NMHV tree prefactor; all other prefactors vanish

    Collinear limit We then impose the collinear limit p4||p3. In this limit only the prefactors ¯R2, ¯R3, andS 1 survive, and they all reduce to the three-point NMHV tree prefactor; all other prefactors vanish. Since the three-point NMHV ratio function vanishes at any loop order, the accompanying functions must obey ¯f2 + ¯f3 +f s,1 p4||p3 →0.(15) This reduc...

  6. [6]

    Triple-collinear limit Finally, we impose a triple- collinear consistency condition [62–64] by taking p4||p3||p2. In the triple-collinear limit, the four-point NMHV form factor factorizes into a product of a two-point MHV form factor and theN= 4 triple-collinear splitting function of Grassmann degree four. After normalizing by the cor- responding MHV sect...

  7. [7]

    Wilczek, Phys

    F. Wilczek, Phys. Rev. Lett.39, 1304 (1977)

    1977

  8. [8]

    M. A. Shifman, A. I. Vainshtein, and V. I. Zakharov, Phys. Lett. B78, 443 (1978)

    1978

  9. [9]

    W. L. van Neerven, Z. Phys. C30, 595 (1986)

    1986

  10. [10]

    Arkani-Hamed, L

    N. Arkani-Hamed, L. J. Dixon, A. J. McLeod, M. Spradlin, J. Trnka, and A. Volovich, Snowmass 2021 (2022), arXiv:2207.10636 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  11. [11]

    Form factors at strong coupling via a Y-system

    J. Maldacena and A. Zhiboedov, JHEP11, 104, arXiv:1009.1139 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  12. [12]

    L. F. Alday and J. Maldacena, JHEP11, 068, arXiv:0710.1060 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  13. [13]

    Form Factors in N=4 Super Yang-Mills and Periodic Wilson Loops

    A. Brandhuber, B. Spence, G. Travaglini, and G. Yang, JHEP01, 134, arXiv:1011.1899 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  14. [14]

    Harmony of Super Form Factors

    A. Brandhuber, O. Gurdogan, R. Mooney, G. Travaglini, and G. Yang, JHEP10, 046, arXiv:1107.5067 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  15. [15]

    Y-system for form factors at strong coupling in AdS5 and with multi-operator insertions in AdS3

    Z. Gao and G. Yang, JHEP06, 105, arXiv:1303.2668 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  16. [16]

    Li, JHEP05, 209, arXiv:2412.17974 [hep-th]

    Z. Li, JHEP05, 209, arXiv:2412.17974 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  17. [17]

    Form factor recursion relations at loop level

    L. Bianchi, A. Brandhuber, R. Panerai, and G. Travaglini, JHEP02, 182, arXiv:1812.09001 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  18. [18]

    On-shell Diagrams, Gra{\ss}mannians and Integrability for Form Factors

    R. Frassek, D. Meidinger, D. Nandan, and M. Wilhelm, JHEP01, 182, arXiv:1506.08192 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  19. [19]

    L. V. Bork and A. I. Onishchenko, JHEP12, 076, arXiv:1607.00503 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  20. [20]

    L. V. Bork and A. I. Onishchenko, JHEP04, 019, arXiv:1607.02320 [hep-th]. 6

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  21. [21]

    R. H. Boels, B. A. Kniehl, O. V. Tarasov, and G. Yang, JHEP02, 063, arXiv:1211.7028 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  22. [22]

    Color-kinematics duality and Sudakov form factor at five loops for N=4 supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory

    G. Yang, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 271602 (2016), arXiv:1610.02394 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  23. [23]

    G. Lin, G. Yang, and S. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 171602 (2021), arXiv:2106.05280 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  24. [24]

    G. Lin, G. Yang, and S. Zhang, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron.67, 241011 (2024), arXiv:2112.09123 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  25. [25]

    Sever, A

    A. Sever, A. G. Tumanov, and M. Wilhelm, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 031602 (2021), arXiv:2009.11297 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  26. [26]

    Sever, A

    A. Sever, A. G. Tumanov, and M. Wilhelm, JHEP10, 071, arXiv:2105.13367 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  27. [27]

    Sever, A

    A. Sever, A. G. Tumanov, and M. Wilhelm, JHEP03, 128, arXiv:2112.10569 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  28. [28]

    Basso and A

    B. Basso and A. G. Tumanov, JHEP02, 022, arXiv:2308.08432 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  29. [29]

    Caron-Huot, L

    S. Caron-Huot, L. J. Dixon, J. M. Drummond, F. Dulat, J. Foster, ¨O. G¨ urdo˘ gan, M. von Hippel, A. J. McLeod, and G. Papathanasiou, PoSCORFU2019, 003 (2020), arXiv:2005.06735 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  30. [30]

    L. J. Dixon, A. J. McLeod, and M. Wilhelm, JHEP04, 147, arXiv:2012.12286 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2012

  31. [31]

    L. J. Dixon, ¨O. G¨ urdo˘ gan, Y.-T. Liu, A. J. McLeod, and M. Wilhelm, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 111601 (2023), arXiv:2212.02410 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  32. [32]

    L. J. Dixon, O. Gurdogan, A. J. McLeod, and M. Wil- helm, JHEP07, 153, arXiv:2204.11901 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  33. [33]

    L. J. Dixon and S. Xin, JHEP01, 012, [Erratum: JHEP 03, 159 (2026)], arXiv:2411.01571 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2026

  34. [34]

    Y. Guo, L. Wang, G. Yang, and Y. Yin, JHEP02, 002, arXiv:2409.12445 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  35. [35]

    Dixon and Z

    L. Dixon and Z. Li, To appear

  36. [36]

    Basso, L

    B. Basso, L. J. Dixon, and A. G. Tumanov, JHEP02, 034, arXiv:2410.22402 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  37. [37]

    J. M. Henn, J. Lim, and W. J. Torres Bobadilla, JHEP 02, 085, arXiv:2410.22465 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  38. [38]

    Y. Guo, L. Wang, and G. Yang, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 151602 (2021), arXiv:2106.01374 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  39. [39]

    Bianchi, A

    L. Bianchi, A. Brandhuber, R. Panerai, and G. Travaglini, JHEP02, 134, arXiv:1812.10468 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  40. [40]

    L. J. Dixon, O. Gurdogan, A. J. McLeod, and M. Wilhelm, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 111602 (2022), arXiv:2112.06243 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  41. [41]

    L. J. Dixon and Y.-T. Liu, JHEP09, 098, arXiv:2308.08199 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  42. [42]

    Analytic two-loop form factors in N=4 SYM

    A. Brandhuber, G. Travaglini, and G. Yang, JHEP05, 082, arXiv:1201.4170 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  43. [43]

    Hopf algebras, coproducts and symbols: an application to Higgs boson amplitudes

    C. Duhr, JHEP08, 043, arXiv:1203.0454 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  44. [44]

    X. Chen, X. Guan, and B. Mistlberger, (2025), arXiv:2504.06490 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  45. [45]

    A. V. Kotikov and L. N. Lipatov, Nucl. Phys. B661, 19 (2003), [Erratum: Nucl.Phys.B 685, 405–407 (2004)], arXiv:hep-ph/0208220

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  46. [46]

    A. V. Kotikov, L. N. Lipatov, A. I. Onishchenko, and V. N. Velizhanin, Phys. Lett. B595, 521 (2004), [Er- ratum: Phys.Lett.B 632, 754–756 (2006)], arXiv:hep- th/0404092

    work page arXiv 2004

  47. [47]

    L. J. Dixon, JHEP01, 075, arXiv:1712.07274 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  48. [48]

    A. B. Goncharov, M. Spradlin, C. Vergu, and A. Volovich, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 151605 (2010), arXiv:1006.5703 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  49. [49]

    C. Duhr, H. Gangl, and J. R. Rhodes, JHEP10, 075, arXiv:1110.0458 [math-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  50. [50]

    Abreu, H

    S. Abreu, H. Ita, F. Moriello, B. Page, W. Tschernow, and M. Zeng, JHEP11, 117, arXiv:2005.04195 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2005

  51. [51]

    Chicherin, V

    D. Chicherin, V. Sotnikov, and S. Zoia, JHEP01, 096, arXiv:2110.10111 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  52. [52]

    Abreu, H

    S. Abreu, H. Ita, B. Page, and W. Tschernow, JHEP03, 182, arXiv:2107.14180 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  53. [53]

    Abreu, D

    S. Abreu, D. Chicherin, H. Ita, B. Page, V. Sotnikov, W. Tschernow, and S. Zoia, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 141601 (2024), arXiv:2306.15431 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  54. [54]

    J. M. Henn, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 251601 (2013), arXiv:1304.1806 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  55. [55]

    J. M. Henn, J. Phys. A48, 153001 (2015), arXiv:1412.2296 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  56. [56]

    L. V. Bork, JHEP01, 049, arXiv:1203.2596 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  57. [57]

    L. V. Bork, D. I. Kazakov, and G. S. Vartanov, JHEP 10, 133, arXiv:1107.5551 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  58. [58]

    J. M. Drummond, J. Henn, G. P. Korchemsky, and E. Sokatchev, Nucl. Phys. B828, 317 (2010), arXiv:0807.1095 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  59. [59]

    Sharpening The Leading Singularity

    F. Cachazo, (2008), arXiv:0803.1988 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  60. [60]

    Twistor-Strings, Grassmannians and Leading Singularities

    M. Bullimore, L. J. Mason, and D. Skinner, JHEP03, 070, arXiv:0912.0539 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  61. [61]

    Scattering Amplitudes and the Positive Grassmannian

    N. Arkani-Hamed, J. L. Bourjaily, F. Cachazo, A. B. Goncharov, A. Postnikov, and J. Trnka,Grassmannian Geometry of Scattering Amplitudes(Cambridge Univer- sity Press, 2016) arXiv:1212.5605 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  62. [62]

    Similar to the case of scattering amplitudes, these operations do not introduce additional R-invariants beyond one-loop lead- ing singularities

    We note that the leading singularities of the form fac- tor at all-loop orders, along with their corresponding on- shell diagrams, can always be obtained from the one-loop leading singularity through gluing operations, including BCFW bridges and inverse-soft factors [55]. Similar to the case of scattering amplitudes, these operations do not introduce addi...

  63. [63]

    L. V. Bork, JHEP12, 111, arXiv:1407.5568 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  64. [64]

    Y. Guo, L. Wang, and G. Yang, Commun. Theor. Phys. 77, 055203 (2025), arXiv:2209.06816 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  65. [65]

    Carrˆ olo, D

    S. Carrˆ olo, D. Chicherin, J. Henn, Q. Yang, and Y. Zhang, JHEP07, 214, arXiv:2505.01245 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  66. [66]

    Carrˆ olo, D

    S. Carrˆ olo, D. Chicherin, J. Henn, Q. Yang, and Y. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 181602 (2026), arXiv:2510.20565 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2026

  67. [67]

    QCD Scattering Amplitudes and Prescriptive Unitarity

    S. Carrˆ olo, D. Chicherin, J. Henn, Q. Yang, and Y. Zhang, (2026), arXiv:2602.02783 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  68. [68]

    Collinear Factorization and Splitting Functions for Next-to-next-to-leading Order QCD Calculations

    S. Catani and M. Grazzini, Phys. Lett. B446, 143 (1999), arXiv:hep-ph/9810389

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  69. [69]

    The triple collinear limit of one-loop QCD amplitudes

    S. Catani, D. de Florian, and G. Rodrigo, Phys. Lett. B 586, 323 (2004), arXiv:hep-ph/0312067

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  70. [70]

    One-loop triple collinear splitting amplitudes in QCD

    S. Badger, F. Buciuni, and T. Peraro, JHEP09, 188, arXiv:1507.05070 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  71. [71]

    D. A. Kosower, R. Roiban, and C. Vergu, Phys. Rev. D 83, 065018 (2011), arXiv:1009.1376 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  72. [72]

    L. J. Dixon, J. M. Drummond, and J. M. Henn, JHEP 01, 024, arXiv:1111.1704 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  73. [73]

    Y. J. Zhu, JHEP02, 018, arXiv:2009.08919 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2009

  74. [74]

    Czakon, F

    M. Czakon, F. Eschment, and T. Schellenberger, JHEP 04, 065, arXiv:2211.06465 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  75. [75]

    Two-loop leading-color QCD corrections for Higgs plus two-jet production in the heavy-top limit

    G. De Laurentis, H. Ita, V. Kuschke, M. Ruf, and V. Sot- nikov, (2026), arXiv:2605.04009 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  76. [76]

    Del Duca and L

    V. Del Duca and L. J. Dixon, J. Phys. A55, 443016 (2022), arXiv:2203.13026 [hep-th]. 7

    work page arXiv 2022

  77. [77]

    L. J. Dixon and M. von Hippel, JHEP10, 065, arXiv:1408.1505 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  78. [78]

    L. J. Dixon and I. Esterlis, JHEP07, 116, [Erratum: JHEP 08, 131 (2016)], arXiv:1602.02107 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  79. [79]

    Eliminating spurious poles from gauge-theoretic amplitudes

    A. Hodges, JHEP05, 135, arXiv:0905.1473 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  80. [80]

    Local Integrals for Planar Scattering Amplitudes

    N. Arkani-Hamed, J. L. Bourjaily, F. Cachazo, and J. Trnka, JHEP06, 125, arXiv:1012.6032 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

Showing first 80 references.