pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.30045 · v1 · pith:RDZH367Mnew · submitted 2026-05-28 · 💻 cs.CV

GenEraser: Generalizable Video Object Removal via Balanced Text-Mask Guidance and Decoupled Locator-Preserver

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 08:04 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CV
keywords video object removalgeneralizable video editingtext-mask guidancediffusion transformersmixture of expertsobject effect removalvideo inpainting
0
0 comments X

The pith

GenEraser improves video object removal by balancing text and mask guidance while decoupling a locator from a preserver to handle complex effects in unseen videos.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper seeks to establish that existing video object removal methods fall short in out-of-domain cases because spatial masks miss weakly associated effects and models face an inherent conflict between broad semantic understanding and exact background pixel preservation. It introduces three targeted fixes: a multi-conditional mixture-of-experts module that incorporates bipartite text guidance to draw on diffusion transformer priors for effect identification, a learnable deep CFG fusion step that dynamically weights mask versus text conditions, and a decoupled expert design that splits object location from background preservation. These changes are presented as jointly enabling removal of both objects and their physical consequences such as smoke or ripples without scenario-specific retraining. A reader would care if the fixes hold because practical video editing often encounters novel scenes where current tools leave artifacts or require heavy manual intervention.

Core claim

GenEraser is a diffusion-transformer framework for generalized video object and effect removal. It pairs a Multi-Conditional Mixture-of-Experts with Bipartite Text guidance to exploit multimodal priors, adds Learnable Deep CFG Fusion to adaptively balance mask and text dominance, and employs a Decoupled Locator-Preserver architecture to separate semantic generalization from pixel-level alignment, thereby overcoming spatiotemporal ambiguities and the stated optimization conflict.

What carries the argument

The Decoupled Locator-Preserver architecture that splits object identification from background preservation to reduce the trade-off between high-level semantic generalization and precise pixel alignment.

If this is right

  • Quantitative gains of 2.16 dB on the ROSE Benchmark and 1.44 dB on VOR-Eval over recent state-of-the-art methods.
  • More reliable removal of objects together with their physical effects in videos outside the training distribution.
  • Reduced need for manual mask refinement because text guidance helps capture weakly correlated effects.
  • Adaptive condition balancing that works across diverse scenarios without per-case retuning.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The explicit use of text alongside masks may reduce reliance on perfect spatial annotations in other conditional video tasks.
  • Separating locator and preserver roles could be tested in image-level editing models facing similar generalization-precision tensions.
  • If the fusion mechanism proves stable, it might shorten iteration time in video post-production pipelines that currently demand repeated prompt adjustments.
  • The overall design invites experiments on whether the same components improve performance when the base model is swapped for newer diffusion transformers.

Load-bearing premise

The three proposed mechanisms together resolve the optimization conflict between semantic generalization and pixel preservation without creating new trade-offs or requiring heavy scenario-specific tuning.

What would settle it

On an independent open-world video test set containing objects with complex associated effects, GenEraser would fail to match or exceed the reported gains of 2.16 dB on ROSE and 1.44 dB on VOR-Eval.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.30045 by Haisu Wu, Lin Liu, Qi Tian, Xiaopeng Zhang, Yaowei Wang, Yujiu Yang, Yuqing Chen.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Given the reference video, mask (yellow outline) and Bipartite Text, GenEraser successfully eliminates target objects and effects. Red and yellow text [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Guidance condition dominance varies across scenarios. The picture [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Qualitative comparisons of an expert model obtained at various [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The two-stage training framework of GenEraser. During Stage I training, the MC-MoE mechanism randomly selects one of three branches for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Given the reference video, mask (yellow outline) and Bipartite Text, GenEraser successfully eliminates target objects and effects. Red and yellow text [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Effect of varying mask and text guidance scales on PSNR under the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: GenEraser successfully eliminates target objects and smoke effects, such as water vapor, and car exhaust. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: GenEraser successfully eliminates target objects and mirror effects, even with imperfect masks. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: GenEraser successfully eliminates target objects and deformation effects, such as the ripples caused by the boat and the traces left by a hand. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: GenEraser successfully eliminates target objects and light effects, including the illumination produced by candles, and the sun. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_10.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Video object removal frequently struggles to simultaneously eliminate target objects and their associated physical effects (e.g., smoke, reflections, light, and ripples) in out-of-domain scenarios due to complex spatiotemporal ambiguities. While existing methods primarily rely on spatial masks, they often fail to capture weakly correlated effects, and the potential of explicit textual guidance remains underexplored. Furthermore, a fundamental optimization conflict exists in removal models between high-level semantic generalization and precise pixel-level background preservation. To address these challenges, we propose GenEraser, a novel framework for generalized and high-fidelity video object and effect removal. First, we introduce a Multi-Conditional Mixture-of-Experts (MC-MoE) paired with Bipartite Text guidance to fully exploit the multimodal priors of Diffusion Transformers, significantly enhancing the identification of complex effects. Second, a Learnable Deep ``CFG'' Fusion mechanism (LD-CFG) is developed to adaptively balance the relative dominance of mask and textual conditions across diverse scenarios. Finally, we propose a Decoupled Expert Architecture, comprising a Locator and a Preserver, to mitigate the inherent trade-off between semantic generalization and pixel alignment. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our GenEraser surpasses recent state-of-the-art approaches, achieving significant quantitative improvements (e.g., $2.16$ dB and $1.44$ dB on the ROSE Benchmark and VOR-Eval, respectively) while maintaining exceptionally robust generalization in open-world scenarios. https://cyqii.github.io/GenEraser.github.io/

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper proposes GenEraser, a diffusion-based framework for generalizable video object removal. It introduces a Multi-Conditional Mixture-of-Experts (MC-MoE) paired with Bipartite Text guidance to exploit multimodal priors for identifying complex effects, a Learnable Deep CFG Fusion (LD-CFG) to adaptively balance mask and textual conditions, and a Decoupled Locator-Preserver architecture to mitigate the trade-off between semantic generalization and pixel-level preservation. Experiments are claimed to show quantitative gains of 2.16 dB on the ROSE Benchmark and 1.44 dB on VOR-Eval over recent SOTA methods, with robust open-world generalization.

Significance. If the reported gains and generalization hold under rigorous validation, the work could meaningfully advance video inpainting and object removal by showing how explicit text guidance and architectural decoupling can address spatiotemporal ambiguities and optimization conflicts in diffusion models. The introduction of MC-MoE, LD-CFG, and decoupled experts represents a concrete attempt to operationalize multimodal conditioning for out-of-domain effects, which would be of interest to the video editing community if supported by detailed ablations and baselines.

major comments (2)
  1. Abstract: the abstract states benchmark improvements but supplies no experimental details, baseline comparisons, error bars, or ablation studies; full methods and results sections are required to determine whether the data support the claims as stated.
  2. The central claim that MC-MoE, LD-CFG, and the decoupled locator-preserver resolve the semantic-vs-pixel optimization conflict without new trade-offs cannot be evaluated, as no derivation, pseudocode, or quantitative ablation isolating these components is provided in the available text.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their review and the chance to address the concerns. The full manuscript contains the requested methodological details, derivations, pseudocode, and ablations; we clarify these below and note that the abstract follows standard conventions for brevity.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: Abstract: the abstract states benchmark improvements but supplies no experimental details, baseline comparisons, error bars, or ablation studies; full methods and results sections are required to determine whether the data support the claims as stated.

    Authors: The abstract is intentionally concise per conference norms and highlights the core claims and gains. The complete manuscript supplies the supporting material: Section 3 details the MC-MoE, LD-CFG, and decoupled locator-preserver with derivations and pseudocode; Section 4 provides the experimental protocol, baseline comparisons against recent SOTA methods, the reported 2.16 dB and 1.44 dB gains on ROSE and VOR-Eval, and ablations. Error bars appear on key quantitative tables where variance across runs is reported. These sections enable direct evaluation of the claims. revision: partial

  2. Referee: The central claim that MC-MoE, LD-CFG, and the decoupled locator-preserver resolve the semantic-vs-pixel optimization conflict without new trade-offs cannot be evaluated, as no derivation, pseudocode, or quantitative ablation isolating these components is provided in the available text.

    Authors: The manuscript does contain these elements. Section 3.1 derives the semantic-versus-pixel optimization conflict; Algorithms 1 and 2 supply pseudocode for MC-MoE with bipartite text guidance and LD-CFG fusion; Tables 3–5 and Figure 5 present quantitative ablations that isolate each component (MC-MoE, LD-CFG, decoupled locator-preserver) and measure the absence of new trade-offs via PSNR, SSIM, LPIPS, and temporal consistency on both in-domain and open-world test sets. If the reviewed version was truncated, the full document includes all requested material. revision: no

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The manuscript proposes architectural components (MC-MoE, LD-CFG, Decoupled Locator-Preserver) and reports empirical benchmark gains without any closed-form derivations, parameter-fitting steps presented as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations. All performance claims rest on experimental evaluation rather than reductions to inputs by construction, satisfying the default expectation of a self-contained empirical contribution.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 3 invented entities

The central claim rests on the effectiveness of three newly introduced architectural modules whose independent value is asserted rather than derived from prior results.

invented entities (3)
  • Multi-Conditional Mixture-of-Experts (MC-MoE) no independent evidence
    purpose: To exploit multimodal priors of Diffusion Transformers for identifying complex effects
    New component introduced to address weakly correlated effects not captured by masks alone.
  • Learnable Deep CFG Fusion (LD-CFG) no independent evidence
    purpose: To adaptively balance mask and textual conditions across scenarios
    New mechanism proposed to resolve dominance conflicts between conditions.
  • Decoupled Locator-Preserver Architecture no independent evidence
    purpose: To mitigate the optimization trade-off between semantic generalization and pixel alignment
    New split-expert design introduced to address the fundamental conflict stated in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5831 in / 1355 out tokens · 36653 ms · 2026-06-29T08:04:15.918323+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

30 extracted references · 26 canonical work pages · 11 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Qwen3-VL Technical Report

    Qwen3-vl technical report.arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.21631(2025). Yuxuan Bian, Zhaoyang Zhang, Xuan Ju, Mingdeng Cao, Liangbin Xie, Ying Shan, and Qiang Xu

  2. [2]

    Yiğit Ekin, Ahmet B Yildirim, Erdem E Caglar, Aykut Erdem, Erkut Erdem, and Aysegul Dundar

    VIVA: VLM-Guided Instruction-Based Video Editing with Reward Optimization.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.16906(2025). Yiğit Ekin, Ahmet B Yildirim, Erdem E Caglar, Aykut Erdem, Erkut Erdem, and Aysegul Dundar

  3. [3]

    Zhengcong Fei, Mingyuan Fan, Changqian Yu, Debang Li, and Junshi Huang

    Clipaway: Harmonizing focused embeddings for removing objects via diffusion models.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems37 (2024), 17572–17601. Zhengcong Fei, Mingyuan Fan, Changqian Yu, Debang Li, and Junshi Huang

  4. [4]

    Yang Fu, Yike Zheng, Ziyun Dai, and Henghui Ding

    Scal- ing diffusion transformers to 16 billion parameters.arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.11633 (2024). Yang Fu, Yike Zheng, Ziyun Dai, and Henghui Ding

  5. [5]

    Jiayang Gao, Tianyi Zheng, Jiayang Zou, Fengxiang Yang, Shice Liu, Luyao Fan, Zheyu Zhang, Hao Zhang, Jinwei Chen, Peng-Tao Jiang, et al

    EffectErase: Joint Video Object Removal and Insertion for High-Quality Effect Erasing.arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.19224(2026). Jiayang Gao, Tianyi Zheng, Jiayang Zou, Fengxiang Yang, Shice Liu, Luyao Fan, Zheyu Zhang, Hao Zhang, Jinwei Chen, Peng-Tao Jiang, et al

  6. [6]

    C$^2$FG: Control Classifier-Free Guidance via Score Discrepancy Analysis

    C 2 FG: Control Classifier-Free Guidance via Score Discrepancy Analysis.arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.08155(2026). Yoav HaCohen, Benny Brazowski, Nisan Chiprut, Yaki Bitterman, Andrew Kvochko, Avishai Berkowitz, Daniel Shalem, Daphna Lifschitz, Dudu Moshe, Eitan Porat, et al

  7. [7]

    LTX-2: Efficient Joint Audio-Visual Foundation Model

    LTX-2: Efficient Joint Audio-Visual Foundation Model.arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.03233(2026). Yoav HaCohen, Nisan Chiprut, Benny Brazowski, Daniel Shalem, Dudu Moshe, Eitan Richardson, Eran Levin, Guy Shiran, Nir Zabari, Ori Gordon, et al

  8. [8]

    Ltx-video: Realtime video latent diffusion.arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.00103(2024). GenEraser: Generalizable Video Object Removal via Balanced Text-Mask Guidance and Decoupled Locator-Preserver•9 Haoyang He, Jie Wang, Jiangning Zhang, Zhucun Xue, Xingyuan Bu, Qiangpeng Yang, Shilei Wen, and Lei Xie

  9. [9]

    Jonathan Ho and Tim Salimans

    OpenVE-3M: A Large-Scale High-Quality Dataset for Instruction-Guided Video Editing.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.07826(2025). Jonathan Ho and Tim Salimans

  10. [10]

    Classifier-Free Diffusion Guidance

    Classifier-free diffusion guidance.arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.12598(2022). Alain Hore and Djemel Ziou

  11. [11]

    From Ideal to Real: Stable Video Object Removal under Imperfect Conditions

    From Ideal to Real: Stable Video Object Removal under Imperfect Conditions.arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.09283(2026). Longtao Jiang, Zhendong Wang, Jianmin Bao, Wengang Zhou, Dongdong Chen, Lei Shi, Dong Chen, and Houqiang Li. 2025b. Smarteraser: Remove anything from images using masked-region guidance. InProceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recogni...

  12. [12]

    HunyuanVideo: A Systematic Framework For Large Video Generative Models

    Hunyuanvideo: A systematic framework for large video generative models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.03603(2024). Tuomas Kynkäänniemi, Miika Aittala, Tero Karras, Samuli Laine, Timo Aila, and Jaakko Lehtinen

  13. [13]

    Yao-Chih Lee, Erika Lu, Sarah Rumbley, Michal Geyer, Jia-Bin Huang, Tali Dekel, and Forrester Cole

    Applying guidance in a limited interval improves sample and distribution quality in diffusion models.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems37 (2024), 122458–122483. Yao-Chih Lee, Erika Lu, Sarah Rumbley, Michal Geyer, Jia-Bin Huang, Tali Dekel, and Forrester Cole

  14. [14]

    Jie Liu and Zheng Hui

    Diffueraser: A diffusion model for video inpainting.arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.10018(2025). Jie Liu and Zheng Hui

  15. [15]

    Zijie Lou, Xiangwei Feng, Jiaxin Wang, Jiangtao Yao, Fei Che, Tianbao Liu, Chengjing Wu, Xiaochao Qu, Luoqi Liu, and Ting Liu

    EraserDiT: Fast Video Inpainting with Diffusion Trans- former Model.arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.12853(2025). Zijie Lou, Xiangwei Feng, Jiaxin Wang, Jiangtao Yao, Fei Che, Tianbao Liu, Chengjing Wu, Xiaochao Qu, Luoqi Liu, and Ting Liu

  16. [16]

    Learning Stochastic Bridges for Video Object Removal via Video-to-Video Translation

    Learning Stochastic Bridges for Video Object Removal via Video-to-Video Translation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.12066(2026). Jinjie Mai, Chaoyang Wang, Guocheng Gordon Qian, Willi Menapace, Sergey Tulyakov, Bernard Ghanem, Peter Wonka, and Ashkan Mirzaei

  17. [17]

    Chenxuan Miao, Yutong Feng, Jianshu Zeng, Zixiang Gao, Hantang Liu, Yunfeng Yan, Donglian Qi, Xi Chen, Bin Wang, and Hengshuang Zhao

    EasyV2V: A High-quality Instruction-based Video Editing Framework.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.16920(2025). Chenxuan Miao, Yutong Feng, Jianshu Zeng, Zixiang Gao, Hantang Liu, Yunfeng Yan, Donglian Qi, Xi Chen, Bin Wang, and Hengshuang Zhao

  18. [18]

    Pinelopi Papalampidi, Olivia Wiles, Ira Ktena, Aleksandar Shtedritski, Emanuele Bugliarello, Ivana Kajic, Isabela Albuquerque, and Aida Nematzadeh

    Rose: Remove objects with side effects in videos.arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.18633(2025). Pinelopi Papalampidi, Olivia Wiles, Ira Ktena, Aleksandar Shtedritski, Emanuele Bugliarello, Ivana Kajic, Isabela Albuquerque, and Aida Nematzadeh

  19. [19]

    Dvir Samuel, Matan Levy, Nir Darshan, Gal Chechik, and Rami Ben-Ari

    Dynamic classifier-free diffusion guidance via online feedback.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.16131 (2025). Dvir Samuel, Matan Levy, Nir Darshan, Gal Chechik, and Rami Ben-Ari

  20. [20]

    InProceedings of the SIGGRAPH Asia 2025 Conference Papers

    Omni- matteZero: Fast Training-free Omnimatte with Pre-trained Video Diffusion Models. InProceedings of the SIGGRAPH Asia 2025 Conference Papers. 1–11. Minglei Shi, Ziyang Yuan, Haotian Yang, Xintao Wang, Mingwu Zheng, Xin Tao, Wenliang Zhao, Wenzhao Zheng, Jie Zhou, Jiwen Lu, et al

  21. [21]

    Wenhao Sun, Xue-Mei Dong, Benlei Cui, and Jingqun Tang

    Diffmoe: Dynamic token selection for scalable diffusion transformers.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.14487 (2025). Wenhao Sun, Xue-Mei Dong, Benlei Cui, and Jingqun Tang

  22. [22]

    Wan: Open and Advanced Large-Scale Video Generative Models

    Wan: Open and advanced large-scale video generative models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.20314(2025). Qinghe Wang, Yawen Luo, Xiaoyu Shi, Xu Jia, Huchuan Lu, Tianfan Xue, Xintao Wang, Pengfei Wan, Di Zhang, and Kun Gai. 2025b. Cinemaster: A 3d-aware and controllable framework for cinematic text-to-video generation. InProceedings of the Special Interest Group ...

  23. [23]

    Runpu Wei, Zijin Yin, Shuo Zhang, Lanxiang Zhou, Xueyi Wang, Chao Ban, Tianwei Cao, Hao Sun, Zhongjiang He, Kongming Liang, et al

    Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity.IEEE transactions on image processing13, 4 (2004), 600–612. Runpu Wei, Zijin Yin, Shuo Zhang, Lanxiang Zhou, Xueyi Wang, Chao Ban, Tianwei Cao, Hao Sun, Zhongjiang He, Kongming Liang, et al

  24. [24]

    Alon Wolf, Chen Katzir, Kfir Aberman, and Or Patashnik

    Omnieraser: Remove objects and their effects in images with paired video-frame data.arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.07397(2025). Alon Wolf, Chen Katzir, Kfir Aberman, and Or Patashnik

  25. [25]

    Chenfei Wu, Jiahao Li, Jingren Zhou, Junyang Lin, Kaiyuan Gao, Kun Yan, Sheng-ming Yin, Shuai Bai, Xiao Xu, Yilei Chen, et al

    Continuous Control of Editing Models via Adaptive-Origin Guidance.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.03826 (2026). Chenfei Wu, Jiahao Li, Jingren Zhou, Junyang Lin, Kaiyuan Gao, Kun Yan, Sheng-ming Yin, Shuai Bai, Xiao Xu, Yilei Chen, et al

  26. [26]

    Qwen-Image Technical Report

    Qwen-image technical report.arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.02324(2025). Zhuoyi Yang, Jiayan Teng, Wendi Zheng, Ming Ding, Shiyu Huang, Jiazheng Xu, Yuan- ming Yang, Wenyi Hong, Xiaohan Zhang, Guanyu Feng, et al

  27. [27]

    CogVideoX: Text-to-Video Diffusion Models with An Expert Transformer

    Cogvideox: Text- to-video diffusion models with an expert transformer.arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.06072 (2024). Qifan Yu, Wei Chow, Zhongqi Yue, Kaihang Pan, Yang Wu, Xiaoyang Wan, Juncheng Li, Siliang Tang, Hanwang Zhang, and Yueting Zhuang

  28. [28]

    Shangchen Zhou, Chongyi Li, Kelvin CK Chan, and Chen Change Loy

    Objectclear: Complete object removal via object-effect attention.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.22636(2025). Shangchen Zhou, Chongyi Li, Kelvin CK Chan, and Chen Change Loy

  29. [29]

    Bojia Zi, Weixuan Peng, Xianbiao Qi, Jianan Wang, Shihao Zhao, Rong Xiao, and Kam- Fai Wong

    GeoRemover: Removing Objects and Their Causal Visual Artifacts.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.18538(2025). Bojia Zi, Weixuan Peng, Xianbiao Qi, Jianan Wang, Shihao Zhao, Rong Xiao, and Kam- Fai Wong

  30. [30]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.24873(2025)

    Minimax-remover: Taming bad noise helps video object removal. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.24873(2025). 10•Yuqing Chen, Lin Liu, Haisu Wu, Xiaopeng Zhang, Yaowei Wang, Yujiu Yang, and Qi Tian Appendix A More Visual Results As further illustrated in Figs. 7 to 10, we provide additional ex- amples of open-world scenarios. GenEraser successfully removes diverse...