Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 94 references

A single quadrature measurement on bright squeezed vacuum light can herald macroscopic quantum states of matter, including a zero-polarization Dicke state and a cat-like state.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-02 12:50 UTC pith:DTLXA5T5

load-bearing objection TC-model Gaussian-filter result is clean and well-supported; the Dicke-model cat-state claim needs more evidence before it can carry the paper. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2605.30224 v2 pith:DTLXA5T5 submitted 2026-05-28 quant-ph cond-mat.mes-hallphysics.optics

Heralded ultrafast generation of macroscopic quantum states in matter with bright squeezed vacuum light

Shohei Imai This is my paper
classification quant-ph cond-mat.mes-hallphysics.optics
keywords bright squeezed vacuumquadrature measurementheralded state preparationDicke stateTavis-Cummings modelDicke modelquantum Fisher informationmacroscopic quantum states
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that the apparent classicality of matter driven by bright squeezed vacuum light is an artifact of discarding the light: without measurement, the matter ends up in a Gaussian mixture of classically driven states. If one instead performs a single-shot quadrature measurement on the post-interaction light, the matter is prepared in a Gaussian-weighted superposition of those classically driven trajectories. For an ensemble of two-level dipoles (the Tavis-Cummings model) this simplifies to an exact Gaussian filter on the collective spin, driving the system into the zero-eigenvalue Dicke state |J,0>_x on a timescale set by F_c = g e^r. Brighter squeezed vacuum makes the preparation faster, and including counter-rotating terms (the Dicke model) turns the Dicke state into a z-polarized GHZ-like cat state. If correct, this gives an ultrafast, broadly applicable route to macroscopic quantum states before decoherence dominates.

Core claim

The central discovery is Eq. (18): after interaction with bright squeezed vacuum and a quadrature measurement on the light, the unnormalized matter state is a Gaussian-weighted superposition of matter states driven by classical coherent fields. In the Tavis-Cummings model the heralded evolution operator becomes the exact Gaussian filter U_q^TC(t) = sqrt(F_c sqrt(pi) g) exp[-(F_c t)^2(J_x - q_tilde/(sqrt(2) t))^2], so a zero-outcome measurement selects the J_x = 0 eigenspace and drives the ensemble to the Dicke state |J,0>_x at a rate set by F_c = g e^r. The paper further shows the probability-weighted quantum Fisher information scales as N^(3/2), exceeding the standard quantum limit, and tha

What carries the argument

The key machinery is the combination of the external-field approximation with the Janszky representation of the squeezed vacuum. The Janszky representation writes the squeezed vacuum as a one-dimensional Gaussian-weighted integral of coherent states; the external-field approximation lets each coherent branch drive the matter independently with field strength F = g p, with no backaction. Inserting a quadrature projection converts this integral into the Gaussian-weighted superposition of driven matter trajectories in Eq. (18). In the Tavis-Cummings model this integral is completed exactly, producing the Gaussian filter with respect to the collective spin J_x (Eq. 24), which is the object that

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that the light's coherent-state components pass through the matter unchanged (the external-field approximation, valid when g t << 1 and the photon number far exceeds the number of excited particles); if matter-to-light backaction, multimode structure, or imperfect mode matching disturbs those branches, the exact Gaussian filter of Eq. (24) is spoiled.

What would settle it

Measure the heralded matter state's quantum Fisher information or spin Wigner function after interaction with bright squeezed vacuum for a fixed F_c: if the QFI density does not approach N/2+1 with the predicted ~1/F_c onset for q_tilde=0, or if the asymptotic state is not rotationally symmetric about the x axis, the central claim fails. A laboratory proxy is the time-resolved comparison in the paper's Fig. 3: exact simulations increasingly deviate from the XFA as g t grows, so an experiment entering the regime g t >> 1 should show spoiled Dicke-state generation.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • In the Tavis-Cummings model, a single zero-outcome quadrature click drives an ensemble of N two-level systems to the Dicke state |J,0>_x on a timescale ~1/F_c = 1/(g e^r), with brighter squeezed vacuum accelerating the preparation.
  • The heralded Dicke state carries a probability-weighted quantum Fisher information scaling as N^(3/2) for finite measurement resolution, giving metrological sensitivity beyond the standard quantum limit.
  • Including counter-rotating terms (Dicke model) makes the same protocol produce a stroboscopic transition to a z-polarized GHZ-like cat state, at times t=(2m+1)pi/(2 omega) when F_c/omega is not small.
  • Without the optical measurement, BSV driving alone leaves the matter as a classical mixture; the quantum effect is unlocked only by the quadrature herald.
  • The scheme's parameter estimates suggest state generation on attosecond timescales if F_c/omega is about 0.5 or larger, for example with g/omega ~ 10^-7 and about 10^13 photons.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the single-mode external-field picture survives a full input-output treatment, the same heralding principle could prepare matter states from travelling-wave squeezed pulses, making the protocol relevant to free-space experiments rather than cavities only.
  • The required homodyne resolution Delta q ~ e^-r for attosecond operation (as low as 10^-6 photon units for 10^13-photon BSV) suggests that measurement technology, not light brightness, is the practical bottleneck; improving ultrafast homodyne detection would directly unlock the predicted states.
  • The comparison with cat-state light implies a hierarchy of quantum drives: even-photon cat states retain Heisenberg scaling (N^2) after including success probability, whereas BSV gives N^(3/2); the matter-state quality inherits the drive's quantum resource structure.
  • The late-time backaction result in Appendix A hints that even without heralding, matter can eventually become quantum through complete squeezing transfer at times ~1/g, but this is slow and likely decoherence-limited; the heralded protocol's value is precisely that it acts fast.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper develops a theory of matter driven by bright squeezed vacuum (BSV) using the external-field approximation (XFA) together with the Janszky coherent-state representation. It shows that without measurement the reduced matter state is a Gaussian mixture of classically driven states, while postselecting on a homodyne quadrature outcome produces the Gaussian-weighted superposition in Eq. (18). For the Tavis-Cummings model this collapses to the Gaussian filter in Eq. (24), projecting onto the zero-eigenvalue Dicke state |J,0>_x with a rate set by F_c = g e^r; the paper analyzes the quantum Fisher information, finite measurement resolution, success probability, and validates the TC predictions against exact light-matter simulations in Fig. 3. It then extends the analysis to the Dicke model and claims that counter-rotating terms convert the Dicke state into a z-polarized GHZ-like cat state, Eq. (45), via a Floquet-Magnus expansion. The central TC derivation is clean; the Dicke extension is more speculative.

Significance. If the results hold, the protocol is a conceptually simple and broad state-engineering tool: bright squeezed vacuum plus a single homodyne measurement acts as an effective Gaussian filter on a macroscopic collective observable, with an ultrafast preparation rate in the multiphoton regime. Strengths include the closed-form filter Eq. (24), explicit parameter estimates, and exact numerical validation for the TC model, including a study of finite resolution and of backaction. The paper is also honest about the main limitations: single-mode description, input-output theory, and the demanding quadrature resolution required. However, the second headline result—the Dicke-model cat state—is not supported to the same standard: no full light-matter simulation is provided there, and the high-frequency expansion is used at a marginal parameter value.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. 5, Eqs. (41)-(45)] The claim that counter-rotating terms convert the heralded Dicke state into the GHZ-like state (45) is load-bearing for the abstract and conclusion, but it is validated only within the XFA and by a first-order Floquet-Magnus approximation. The XFA validation in Sec. 4.4/Fig. 3 is for the TC Hamiltonian, which contains no counter-rotating terms; the Dicke model couples both field quadratures and can have qualitatively different backaction. Moreover, the stated validity condition F/omega << 1 is not cleanly satisfied for the strong-field case F_c/omega = 0.27 used in Fig. 4. I request either full exact light-matter simulations for the Dicke model in the same parameter regime (the TC simulation machinery appears directly extendable), or a clear demotion of Eq. (45) to a heuristic XFA prediction with a quantitative estimate of the neglected corrections.
  2. [Sec. 4.4/Fig. 3 and Appendix A] The exact TC simulations show that backaction causes deviations from the XFA at late times, and Appendix A shows that backaction can itself generate quantum Fisher information. Since the Gaussian filter Eq. (24) and the Dicke analysis both rely on the XFA, the paper should specify the operational window more sharply: the protocol time t ~ F_c^{-1} must satisfy g t = e^{-r} << 1 and must remain inside the agreement region of Fig. 3. As written, the reader cannot easily tell from the text whether the claimed ultrafast timescale is always safely before the backaction corrections; an explicit error estimate or a validity diagram in (r, N) would settle this.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (6)] The exponent is hard to parse; write it as exp[-(coth r - 1) p^2 / 2].
  2. [Sec. 5, after Eq. (42)] Clarify that the Floquet condition F/omega << 1 is to be read as applying to the typical field values |F| ~ F_c, so that it requires F_c/omega << 1. The current notation invites confusion when Fig. 4 uses F_c/omega = 0.27.
  3. [Fig. 2 vs Fig. 1] The unconditional curve is called 'orange' in Fig. 1 and 'red' in the text of Sec. 4.3; harmonize the color labels.
  4. [Appendix A, Eqs. (46)-(47)] The power-law fits are presented without confidence intervals or residuals; label them explicitly as numerical fits rather than derived scalings.
  5. [Abstract and Sec. 1] The generated states are described as 'macroscopic' while the exact simulations are for N=32. The scaling arguments are plausible, but a sentence clarifying the extrapolation to larger N would strengthen the presentation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the central Gaussian-filter result is derived from the XFA and Janszky representation, and key claims are checked against exact numerical simulations.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained once the external-field approximation (XFA, Sec. 2.1) and the Janszky representation (Sec. 2.2) are accepted. Eq. (10) is the XFA decomposition of the squeezed-vacuum state; Eq. (18) follows by projecting Eq. (10) onto a quadrature eigenstate; Eq. (24) is the Gaussian integral of Eq. (18) together with the classically driven Tavis-Cummings evolution of Eq. (21). The Dicke-state preparation and QFI scalings are analytic consequences of the resulting exponential filter, not fitted inputs. The Dicke-model cat-state argument (Eqs. 43-45) also follows from Eq. (18) with an explicitly stated Floquet-Magnus approximation; although it lacks a full light-matter simulation for the Dicke model, that is a validation gap rather than a circular reduction. The only self-citations, Refs. [40,41], supply the XFA framework, but the paper independently re-derives the XFA equations and validates them against exact TC numerics in Sec. 4.4, so the self-citation is not load-bearing in a circular way. The numerical fits in Appendix A (Eqs. 46-47) are presented as late-time backaction scalings and are not used to define the target states. No prediction reduces by construction to its inputs; the score of 1 reflects only the minor reliance on the author's prior XFA formulation, not circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

5 free parameters · 7 axioms · 0 invented entities

No new particles, forces, or entities are introduced. All ingredients — bright squeezed vacuum, coherent-state representations, TC/Dicke models, and quadrature measurement — are prior theoretical or experimental objects. The central claim rests on the XFA and single-mode ideal measurement assumptions rather than on new entities.

free parameters (5)
  • g (electron-photon coupling) = Numerics use g=0.005-0.02; experiments: g/ω ~1e-8-1e-5 free space, ~1e-2-1e-1 cavity
    Model input defining the coupling strength; not fitted to data, but central to the XFA timescale and filter strength.
  • r (squeezing parameter) = r=3,4 in numerics; inferred r≈15 for bright BSV with n~1e13
    Input controlling the effective field strength F_c = g e^r. Not fitted to target results.
  • N (particle number) = N=32 in numerics
    Input ensemble size; restricted to even N in the TC analysis.
  • QFI peak prefactor/exponent (0.65, 0.86) = max_t,r[FQ/N] ≈ 0.65 N^0.86
    Fitted to numerical data in Appendix A, Eq. (46); used only for the late-time unconditional backaction discussion, not for the central heralding claim.
  • optimal squeezing parameter fit (0.46, 0.26) = r_c ≈ 0.46 ln N + 0.26
    Fitted to numerical data in Appendix A, Eq. (47); a side result, not part of the main protocol.
axioms (7)
  • domain assumption External-field approximation (XFA): the light remains in coherent state |iF(t)/g⟩ along each branch, with no matter-to-light backaction; valid for g t ≪ 1 and ⟨n⟩ ≫ N_exc.
    Sec. 2.1, Eqs. (2) and (4); used throughout and validated numerically for the TC model in Sec. 4.4.
  • standard math Janszky representation of the squeezed vacuum, Eq. (6): |r⟩ = ∫ dp/sqrt(2π sinh r) exp[-(coth r -1)p²/2] |i p⟩.
    Exact representation from Ref. [42]; basis for the Gaussian superposition in Eq. (9).
  • standard math Thermodynamic-limit orthogonality of coherent states: ⟨iF/g|iF'/g⟩ → sqrt(2π g) δ(F-F') as g→0.
    Used to derive the unconditional mixture Eq. (12) and to simplify the heralded state in Eq. (18).
  • domain assumption Ideal projective quadrature measurement with Kraus operator M_q = |0⟩⟨q;φ| (Eq. 15), plus finite-resolution effect Eq. (27).
    Defines the heralding operation; the conclusion notes that real homodyne detection and mode matching require more detailed treatment.
  • domain assumption Single optical mode, no relaxation or dephasing.
    Stated in Sec. 2.1 and the conclusion; important for the ultrafast generation claim.
  • domain assumption Resonance condition ω=Δ, even N, and initial all-spin-down matter state.
    Sec. 4.1; simplifies the TC evolution to a rotation about J_x.
  • domain assumption Floquet-Magnus expansion for the Dicke model, stated valid for F/ω ≪ 1 (Sec. 5, Eq. 41).
    Used to derive the stroboscopic cat-state transition; the numerical example F_c/ω≈0.27 is only marginally within this condition.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 19334 in / 25482 out tokens · 257903 ms · 2026-08-02T12:50:11.706747+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We show that bright squeezed vacuum light, combined with a single-shot quadrature measurement of the post-interaction light, enables the ultrafast generation of macroscopic quantum states in matter. Although in the weak-coupling regime multiphoton quantum light leaves the unconditional matter state as a classical mixture due to light--matter entanglement, quadrature-based heralding prepares the matter in a Gaussian-weighted quantum superposition of laser-driven matter states. For an ensemble of resonantly electric-dipole-coupled two-level systems, this heralding dynamics acts as a Gaussian filter with respect to the electric polarization, with brighter squeezed-vacuum light accelerating the preparation of the zero-eigenvalue Dicke state. Counter-rotating terms further drive a stroboscopic transition from this Dicke state to a cat-like state. Our results open a route to ultrafast engineering of macroscopic quantum matter with strong-field quantum light.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.30224 by Shohei Imai.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Quadrature-heralded matter dynamics in the TC model [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Dependence of the quadrature-heralded QFI density [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Comparison between the XFA and full light–matter simulations for the quadrature-heralded QFI [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Quadrature-heralded matter dynamics in the Dicke model [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Late-time unconditional matter dynamics in the TC model [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_5.png] view at source ↗

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

94 extracted references · 2 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Die gegenwärtige Situation in der Quantenmechanik

    E. Schrödinger, “Die gegenwärtige Situation in der Quantenmechanik”, Naturwissenschaften23, 807 (1935)

    1935

  2. [2]

    Macroscopic Quantum Systems and the Quantum Theory of Measurement

    A. J. Leggett, “Macroscopic Quantum Systems and the Quantum Theory of Measurement”, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl.69, 80 (1980). 16

    1980

  3. [3]

    Macroscopic quantum states: Measures, fragility, and implementations

    F. Fröwis, P. Sekatski, W. Dür, N. Gisin, and N. Sangouard, “Macroscopic quantum states: Measures, fragility, and implementations”, Rev. Mod. Phys.90, 025004 (2018)

    2018

  4. [4]

    Testing the limits of quantum mechanical superpositions

    M. Arndt and K. Hornberger, “Testing the limits of quantum mechanical superpositions”, Nat. Phys. 10, 271 (2014)

    2014

  5. [5]

    Algorithms for quantum computation: discrete logarithms and factoring

    P. Shor, “Algorithms for quantum computation: discrete logarithms and factoring”, in Proc. 35th Annu. Symp. Found. Comput. Sci. (1994), pp. 124–134

    1994

  6. [6]

    A fast quantum mechanical algorithm for database search

    L. K. Grover, “A fast quantum mechanical algorithm for database search”, in Proc. twenty-eighth Annu. ACM Symp. Theory Comput. - STOC ’96, Vol. Part F1294, March (1996), pp. 212–219

    1996

  7. [7]

    Minimum mean-squared error of estimates in quantum statistics

    C. Helstrom, “Minimum mean-squared error of estimates in quantum statistics”, Phys. Lett. A25, 101 (1967)

    1967

  8. [8]

    Quantum-mechanical noise in an interferometer

    C. M. Caves, “Quantum-mechanical noise in an interferometer”, Phys. Rev. D23, 1693 (1981)

    1981

  9. [9]

    Statistical distance and the geometry of quantum states

    S. L. Braunstein and C. M. Caves, “Statistical distance and the geometry of quantum states”, Phys. Rev. Lett.72, 3439 (1994)

    1994

  10. [10]

    Quantum-Enhanced Measurements: Beating the Standard Quantum Limit

    V. Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, and L. Maccone, “Quantum-Enhanced Measurements: Beating the Standard Quantum Limit”, Science306, 1330 (2004)

    2004

  11. [11]

    Theemergenceofclassicalpropertiesthroughinteractionwiththeenvironment

    E.JoosandH.D.Zeh,“Theemergenceofclassicalpropertiesthroughinteractionwiththeenvironment”, Zeitschrift für Phys. B Condens. Matter59, 223 (1985)

    1985

  12. [12]

    Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical

    W. H. Zurek, “Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical”, Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 715 (2003)

    2003

  13. [13]

    Colloquium: Quantum optics of intense light–matter interaction

    P. Stammer, J. Rivera-Dean, P. Tzallas, M. F. Ciappina, and M. Lewenstein, “Colloquium: Quantum optics of intense light–matter interaction”, arXiv:2510.19045

    arXiv

  14. [14]

    Quantum Optics and Quantum Electrodynamics of Strong Field Processes

    M. F. Ciappina, M. Y. Ivanov, M. Lewenstein, J. Rivera-Dean, P. Stammer, and P. Tzallas, “Quantum Optics and Quantum Electrodynamics of Strong Field Processes”, arXiv:2509.26602

    arXiv

  15. [15]

    Quantum Electrodynamics of Intense Laser-Matter Interactions: A Tool for Quantum State Engineering

    P. Stammer, J. Rivera-Dean, A. Maxwell, T. Lamprou, A. Ordóñez, M. F. Ciappina, P. Tzallas, and M. Lewenstein, “Quantum Electrodynamics of Intense Laser-Matter Interactions: A Tool for Quantum State Engineering”, PRX Quantum4, 010201 (2023)

    2023

  16. [16]

    Strong–laser–field physics, non–classical light states and quantum information science

    U. Bhattacharya, T. Lamprou, A. S. Maxwell, A. Ordóñez, E. Pisanty, J. Rivera-Dean, P. Stammer, M. F. Ciappina, M. Lewenstein, and P. Tzallas, “Strong–laser–field physics, non–classical light states and quantum information science”, Reports Prog. Phys.86, 094401 (2023)

    2023

  17. [17]

    Lewenstein, N

    M. Lewenstein, N. Baldelli, U. Bhattacharya, J. Biegert, M. F. Ciappina, T. Grass, P. T. Grochowski, A. S. Johnson, T. Lamprou, A. S. Maxwell, A. Ordóñez, E. Pisanty, J. Rivera-Dean, P. Stammer, and P. Tzallas, inSpringer Proc. Phys.(2024), pp. 27–44

    2024

  18. [18]

    Quantumphenomenainattosecondscience

    L.Cruz-Rodriguez,D.Dey,A.Freibert,andP.Stammer,“Quantumphenomenainattosecondscience”, Nat. Rev. Phys.6, 691 (2024)

    2024

  19. [19]

    Generation of optical Schrödinger cat states in intense laser–matter interactions

    M. Lewenstein, M. F. Ciappina, E. Pisanty, J. Rivera-Dean, P. Stammer, T. Lamprou, and P. Tzallas, “Generation of optical Schrödinger cat states in intense laser–matter interactions”, Nat. Phys.17, 1104 (2021)

    2021

  20. [20]

    Stronglaserfieldsandtheirpowertogeneratecontrollablehigh-photon- number coherent-state superpositions

    J. Rivera-Dean, T. Lamprou, E. Pisanty, P. Stammer, A. F. Ordóñez, A. S. Maxwell, M. F. Ciappina, M.Lewenstein,andP.Tzallas,“Stronglaserfieldsandtheirpowertogeneratecontrollablehigh-photon- number coherent-state superpositions”, Phys. Rev. A105, 033714 (2022)

    2022

  21. [21]

    Theory of entanglement and measurement in high-order harmonic generation

    P. Stammer, “Theory of entanglement and measurement in high-order harmonic generation”, Phys. Rev. A106, L050402 (2022). 17

    2022

  22. [22]

    HighPhotonNumberEntangledStatesandCoherentStateSuperpositionfromtheExtremeUltraviolet to the Far Infrared

    P. Stammer, J. Rivera-Dean, T. Lamprou, E. Pisanty, M. F. Ciappina, P. Tzallas, and M. Lewenstein, “HighPhotonNumberEntangledStatesandCoherentStateSuperpositionfromtheExtremeUltraviolet to the Far Infrared”, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 123603 (2022)

    2022

  23. [23]

    Quantum state engineering of light using intensity measurements and postselection

    J. Rivera-Dean, T. Lamprou, E. Pisanty, M. F. Ciappina, P. Tzallas, M. Lewenstein, and P. Stammer, “Quantum state engineering of light using intensity measurements and postselection”, Phys. Rev. A 112, 013110 (2025)

    2025

  24. [24]

    Superbunched bright squeezed vacuum state

    T. Sh. Iskhakov, A. M. Pérez, K. Yu. Spasibko, M. V. Chekhova, and G. Leuchs, “Superbunched bright squeezed vacuum state”, Opt. Lett.37, 1919 (2012)

    1919

  25. [25]

    Bright squeezed vacuum: Entanglement of macroscopic light beams

    M. Chekhova, G. Leuchs, and M. Żukowski, “Bright squeezed vacuum: Entanglement of macroscopic light beams”, Opt. Commun.337, 27 (2015)

    2015

  26. [26]

    Properties of bright squeezed vacuum at increasing brightness

    P. R. Sharapova, G. Frascella, M. Riabinin, A. M. Pérez, O. V. Tikhonova, S. Lemieux, R. W. Boyd, G. Leuchs, and M. V. Chekhova, “Properties of bright squeezed vacuum at increasing brightness”, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 013371 (2020)

    2020

  27. [27]

    Multiphoton Effects Enhanced due to Ultrafast Photon-Number Fluctuations

    K. Y. Spasibko, D. A. Kopylov, V. L. Krutyanskiy, T. V. Murzina, G. Leuchs, and M. V. Chekhova, “Multiphoton Effects Enhanced due to Ultrafast Photon-Number Fluctuations”, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 223603 (2017)

    2017

  28. [28]

    High-harmonic generation driven by quantum light

    A. Gorlach, M. E. Tzur, M. Birk, M. Krüger, N. Rivera, O. Cohen, and I. Kaminer, “High-harmonic generation driven by quantum light”, Nat. Phys.19, 1689 (2023)

    2023

  29. [29]

    High-harmonic generation by a bright squeezed vacuum

    A. Rasputnyi, Z. Chen, M. Birk, O. Cohen, I. Kaminer, M. Krüger, D. Seletskiy, M. Chekhova, and F. Tani, “High-harmonic generation by a bright squeezed vacuum”, Nat. Phys.20, 1960 (2024)

    1960

  30. [30]

    High harmonic generation from an atom in a squeezed-vacuum environment

    S. Wang, S. Yu, X. Lai, and X. Liu, “High harmonic generation from an atom in a squeezed-vacuum environment”, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 033010 (2024)

    2024

  31. [31]

    Generation of squeezed high-order harmonics

    M. E. Tzur, M. Birk, A. Gorlach, I. Kaminer, M. Krüger, and O. Cohen, “Generation of squeezed high-order harmonics”, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 033079 (2024)

    2024

  32. [32]

    Photon bunching in high-harmonic emission controlled by quantum light

    S. Lemieux, S. A. Jalil, D. N. Purschke, N. Boroumand, T. J. Hammond, D. Villeneuve, A. Naumov, T. Brabec, and G. Vampa, “Photon bunching in high-harmonic emission controlled by quantum light”, Nat. Photonics19, 767 (2025)

    2025

  33. [33]

    Structured Squeezed Light Allows for High-Harmonic Generation in Classical Forbidden Geometries

    J. Rivera-Dean, P. Stammer, M. F. Ciappina, and M. Lewenstein, “Structured Squeezed Light Allows for High-Harmonic Generation in Classical Forbidden Geometries”, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 013801 (2025)

    2025

  34. [34]

    High-order harmonic generation in a crystal driven by quantum light

    R. V. Gothelf, C. S. Lange, and L. B. Madsen, “High-order harmonic generation in a crystal driven by quantum light”, Phys. Rev. A111, 063105 (2025)

    2025

  35. [35]

    Photon-statistics force in ultrafast electron dynamics

    M. Even Tzur, M. Birk, A. Gorlach, M. Krüger, I. Kaminer, and O. Cohen, “Photon-statistics force in ultrafast electron dynamics”, Nat. Photonics17, 501 (2023)

    2023

  36. [36]

    Motion of charged particles in bright squeezed vacuum

    M. Even Tzur and O. Cohen, “Motion of charged particles in bright squeezed vacuum”, Light Sci. Appl.13, 41 (2024)

    2024

  37. [37]

    Multiphoton electron emission with non-classical light

    J. Heimerl, A. Mikhaylov, S. Meier, H. Höllerer, I. Kaminer, M. Chekhova, and P. Hommelhoff, “Multiphoton electron emission with non-classical light”, Nat. Phys.20, 945 (2024)

    2024

  38. [38]

    Quantum light drives electrons strongly at metal needle tips

    J. Heimerl, A. Rasputnyi, J. Pölloth, S. Meier, M. Chekhova, and P. Hommelhoff, “Quantum light drives electrons strongly at metal needle tips”, Nat. Phys.21, 1899 (2025)

    2025

  39. [39]

    Nonlinear Optics Using Intense Optical Coherent State Superpositions

    T. Lamprou, J. Rivera-Dean, P. Stammer, M. Lewenstein, and P. Tzallas, “Nonlinear Optics Using Intense Optical Coherent State Superpositions”, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 013601 (2025). 18

    2025

  40. [40]

    Electron dynamics induced by quantum cat-state light

    S. Imai, A. Ono, and N. Tsuji, “Electron dynamics induced by quantum cat-state light”, arXiv:2501. 16801

  41. [41]

    Macroscopic Schrödinger-cat states of nonequilibrium electrons induced by cat-state optical driving and projective measurements on the light field

    S. Imai, “Macroscopic Schrödinger-cat states of nonequilibrium electrons induced by cat-state optical driving and projective measurements on the light field”, Phys. Rev. A113, 023702 (2026)

    2026

  42. [42]

    Squeezing via one-dimensional distribution of coherent states

    J. Janszky and A. V. Vinogradov, “Squeezing via one-dimensional distribution of coherent states”, Phys. Rev. Lett.64, 2771 (1990)

    1990

  43. [43]

    Exact Solution for an N-Molecule–Radiation-Field Hamiltonian

    M. Tavis and F. W. Cummings, “Exact Solution for an N-Molecule–Radiation-Field Hamiltonian”, Phys. Rev.170, 379 (1968)

    1968

  44. [44]

    Space Quantization in a Gyrating Magnetic Field

    I. I. Rabi, “Space Quantization in a Gyrating Magnetic Field”, Phys. Rev.51, 652 (1937)

    1937

  45. [45]

    Coherence in Spontaneous Radiation Processes

    R. H. Dicke, “Coherence in Spontaneous Radiation Processes”, Phys. Rev.93, 99 (1954)

    1954

  46. [46]

    Spin squeezing via atom-cavity field coupling

    C. Genes, P. R. Berman, and A. G. Rojo, “Spin squeezing via atom-cavity field coupling”, Phys. Rev. A 68, 043809 (2003)

    2003

  47. [47]

    Atomic quantum superposition state generation via optical probing

    A. E. B. Nielsen, U. V. Poulsen, A. Negretti, and K. Mølmer, “Atomic quantum superposition state generation via optical probing”, Phys. Rev. A79, 023841 (2009)

    2009

  48. [48]

    Spin Squeezing in an Ensemble of Atoms Illuminated with Squeezed Light

    A. Kuzmich, K. Mølmer, and E. S. Polzik, “Spin Squeezing in an Ensemble of Atoms Illuminated with Squeezed Light”, Phys. Rev. Lett.79, 4782 (1997)

    1997

  49. [49]

    Spin Squeezed Atoms: A Macroscopic Entangled Ensemble Created by Light

    J. Hald, J. L. Sørensen, C. Schori, and E. S. Polzik, “Spin Squeezed Atoms: A Macroscopic Entangled Ensemble Created by Light”, Phys. Rev. Lett.83, 1319 (1999)

    1999

  50. [50]

    Cooperative behavior of atoms irradiated by broadband squeezed light

    G. S. Agarwal and R. R. Puri, “Cooperative behavior of atoms irradiated by broadband squeezed light”, Phys. Rev. A41, 3782 (1990)

    1990

  51. [51]

    Quantum Filtering for Squeezed Noise Inputs

    J. Gough and D. Rees, “Quantum Filtering for Squeezed Noise Inputs”, arXiv:2601.12564

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  52. [52]

    Conditional preparation of arbitrary superpositions of atomic Dicke states

    K. Lemr and J. Fiurášek, “Conditional preparation of arbitrary superpositions of atomic Dicke states”, Phys. Rev. A79, 043808 (2009)

    2009

  53. [53]

    DeterministicDicke-statepreparationwithcontinuous measurement and control

    J.K.Stockton,R.vanHandel,andH.Mabuchi,“DeterministicDicke-statepreparationwithcontinuous measurement and control”, Phys. Rev. A70, 022106 (2004)

    2004

  54. [54]

    Generatingconditionalatomicentanglementbymeasuringphotonnumber in a single output channel

    C.GenesandP.R.Berman,“Generatingconditionalatomicentanglementbymeasuringphotonnumber in a single output channel”, Phys. Rev. A73, 013801 (2006)

    2006

  55. [55]

    Quantum state preparation of an atomic ensemble via cavity-assisted homodyne measurement

    Y.-l. Zhang, C.-s. Yang, C.-l. Zou, T. Xia, G.-C. Guo, and X.-B. Zou, “Quantum state preparation of an atomic ensemble via cavity-assisted homodyne measurement”, J. Phys. B At. Mol. Opt. Phys.52, 215003 (2019)

    2019

  56. [56]

    Generating a Superposition of Spin States in an Atomic Ensemble

    S. Massar and E. S. Polzik, “Generating a Superposition of Spin States in an Atomic Ensemble”, Phys. Rev. Lett.91, 060401 (2003)

    2003

  57. [57]

    Generating entangled spin states for quantum metrology by single-photon detection

    R. McConnell, H. Zhang, S. Ćuk, J. Hu, M. H. Schleier-Smith, and V. Vuletić, “Generating entangled spin states for quantum metrology by single-photon detection”, Phys. Rev. A88, 063802 (2013)

    2013

  58. [58]

    Entanglement with negative Wigner function of almost 3,000 atoms heralded by one photon

    R. McConnell, H. Zhang, J. Hu, S. Ćuk, and V. Vuletić, “Entanglement with negative Wigner function of almost 3,000 atoms heralded by one photon”, Nature519, 439 (2015)

    2015

  59. [59]

    Carving Complex Many-Atom Entangled States by Single-Photon Detection

    W. Chen, J. Hu, Y. Duan, B. Braverman, H. Zhang, and V. Vuletić, “Carving Complex Many-Atom Entangled States by Single-Photon Detection”, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 250502 (2015)

    2015

  60. [60]

    Spin-squeezingandDicke-state preparation by heterodyne measurement

    T.Vanderbruggen,S.Bernon,A.Bertoldi,A.Landragin,andP.Bouyer,“Spin-squeezingandDicke-state preparation by heterodyne measurement”, Phys. Rev. A83, 013821 (2011). 19

    2011

  61. [61]

    Feedbackcontrol of coherent spin states using weak nondestructive measurements

    T.Vanderbruggen,R.Kohlhaas,A.Bertoldi,E.Cantin,A.Landragin,andP.Bouyer,“Feedbackcontrol of coherent spin states using weak nondestructive measurements”, Phys. Rev. A89, 063619 (2014)

    2014

  62. [62]

    Generation of macroscopic singlet states in atomic ensembles

    G. Tóth and M. W. Mitchell, “Generation of macroscopic singlet states in atomic ensembles”, New J. Phys.12, 053007 (2010)

    2010

  63. [63]

    Generation of macroscopic singlet states in a cold atomic ensemble

    N.Behbood,F.MartinCiurana,G.Colangelo,M.Napolitano,G.Tóth,R.J.Sewell,andM.W.Mitchell, “Generation of macroscopic singlet states in a cold atomic ensemble”, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 093601 (2014)

    2014

  64. [64]

    Preparation of spin-squeezed atomic states by optical-phase-shift measurement

    I. Bouchoule and K. Mølmer, “Preparation of spin-squeezed atomic states by optical-phase-shift measurement”, Phys. Rev. A66, 043811 (2002)

    2002

  65. [65]

    Unitary cavity spin squeezing by quantum erasure

    I. D. Leroux, M. H. Schleier-Smith, H. Zhang, and V. Vuletić, “Unitary cavity spin squeezing by quantum erasure”, Phys. Rev. A85, 013803 (2012)

    2012

  66. [66]

    Rapid Production of Many-Body Entanglement in Spin-1 Atoms via Cavity Output Photon Counting

    S. J. Masson and S. Parkins, “Rapid Production of Many-Body Entanglement in Spin-1 Atoms via Cavity Output Photon Counting”, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 103601 (2019)

    2019

  67. [67]

    Limitationsofanapproximativephase-spacedescription in strong-field quantum optics

    R.V.Gothelf,L.B.Madsen,andC.S.Lange,“Limitationsofanapproximativephase-spacedescription in strong-field quantum optics”, arXiv:2602.04370

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  68. [68]

    K.Kraus,States,Effects,andOperations:FundamentalNotionsofQuantumTheory,editedbyA.Böhm, J. D. Dollard, and W. H. Wootters, Vol. 190, Lecture Notes in Physics (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1983)

    1983

  69. [69]

    H. M. Wiseman and G. J. Milburn,Quantum Measurement and Control(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Nov. 2009)

    2009

  70. [70]

    Quantum detection and estimation theory

    C. W. Helstrom, “Quantum detection and estimation theory”, J. Stat. Phys.1, 231 (1969)

    1969

  71. [71]

    Holevo,Probabilistic and Statistical Aspects of Quantum Theory(Edizioni della Normale, Pisa, 2011)

    A. Holevo,Probabilistic and Statistical Aspects of Quantum Theory(Edizioni della Normale, Pisa, 2011)

    2011

  72. [72]

    On Distributions in Representation Space

    R. L. Stratonovich, “On Distributions in Representation Space”, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.31, 1012 (1956)

    1956

  73. [73]

    Phase-spaceformulationofquantummechanicsandquantum-statereconstruction for physical systems with Lie-group symmetries

    C.BrifandA.Mann,“Phase-spaceformulationofquantummechanicsandquantum-statereconstruction for physical systems with Lie-group symmetries”, Phys. Rev. A59, 971 (1999)

    1999

  74. [74]

    Multipartite entanglement and high-precision metrology

    G. Tóth, “Multipartite entanglement and high-precision metrology”, Phys. Rev. A85, 022322 (2012)

    2012

  75. [75]

    Fisher information and multiparticle entanglement

    P. Hyllus, W. Laskowski, R. Krischek, C. Schwemmer, W. Wieczorek, H. Weinfurter, L. Pezzé, and A. Smerzi, “Fisher information and multiparticle entanglement”, Phys. Rev. A85, 022321 (2012)

    2012

  76. [76]

    Metrological Nonlinear Squeezing Parameter

    M. Gessner, A. Smerzi, and L. Pezzè, “Metrological Nonlinear Squeezing Parameter”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 090503 (2019)

    2019

  77. [77]

    Metrological Detection of Multipartite Entanglement from Young Diagrams

    Z. Ren, W. Li, A. Smerzi, and M. Gessner, “Metrological Detection of Multipartite Entanglement from Young Diagrams”, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 80502 (2021)

    2021

  78. [78]

    Wigner negativity in spin-j systems

    J. Davis, M. Kumari, R. B. Mann, and S. Ghose, “Wigner negativity in spin-j systems”, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 033134 (2021)

    2021

  79. [79]

    Squeezed spin states

    M. Kitagawa and M. Ueda, “Squeezed spin states”, Phys. Rev. A47, 5138 (1993)

    1993

  80. [80]

    GenerationofspincatstatesinanengineeredDickemodel

    C.Groiseau,S.J.Masson,andS.Parkins,“GenerationofspincatstatesinanengineeredDickemodel”, Phys. Rev. A104, 053721 (2021)

    2021

Showing first 80 references.