Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 1 minor 95 references

GraphShed finds galaxy groups without any tunable parameters by applying watershed segmentation to Voronoi-induced graphs from the density field.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.3

2026-06-28 08:25 UTC pith:SMKIMBDU

load-bearing objection GraphShed claims a parameter-free watershed method on Voronoi graphs that matches FoF on basic stats but differs on group properties, yet the evidence for both the parameter-free status and the improvements stays thin. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2606.03790 v1 pith:SMKIMBDU submitted 2026-06-02 astro-ph.CO astro-ph.IMphysics.comp-ph

GraphShed: a parameter-free Graph-based waterShed group finder

P. Ghafour , S. Ansarifard , M. H. Jalali Kanafi , S. M. S. Movahed This is my paper
classification astro-ph.CO astro-ph.IMphysics.comp-ph
keywords graphshedgalaxysystemscatalogdensityfunctiongroupidentified
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents GraphShed as a group-finding algorithm that segments galaxy positions into aggregations using top-down watershed on separated Voronoi graphs. This approach operates directly on the density field with no adjustable parameters or density thresholds. Tests on the IllustrisTNG100-1 simulation produce a catalog whose mass distribution matches a Friends-of-Friends catalog, along with consistent two-point correlation functions and mass functions. Structural properties such as radius, sphericity, compactness, spin, and centroid shift differ, and velocity-based pair classification shows cleaner separation of nearby over-densities. A sympathetic reader would care because the method aims to deliver group catalogs that keep large-scale cosmological statistics intact while improving resolution of individual system dynamics.

Core claim

GraphShed constructs galaxy group catalogs by performing top-down watershed segmentation on separated Voronoi-induced graphs, allowing recognition of aggregations directly from the density field with no tunable parameters. On IllustrisTNG100-1 data the M200 distributions match those from Friends-of-Friends, as do the two-point correlation function and mass function, while R200, sphericity, compactness, spin, and centroid shift differ; velocity classification further indicates improved separation of interacting pairs that position-only methods would merge.

What carries the argument

Top-down watershed segmentation applied to separated Voronoi-induced graphs, which partitions the density field into groups without parameters or thresholds.

Load-bearing premise

The assumption that top-down watershed segmentation on Voronoi-induced graphs can correctly identify galaxy aggregations solely from the density field without any need for adjustable parameters or thresholds.

What would settle it

Running GraphShed on the same IllustrisTNG100-1 data and finding that the two-point correlation function or mass function of the resulting groups deviates from the Friends-of-Friends version by more than the reported statistical consistency would falsify the preservation of cosmological statistics.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Galaxy group catalogs will exhibit statistically consistent M200 distributions and mass functions with Friends-of-Friends catalogs.
  • Structural properties including R200, sphericity, compactness, spin, and centroid shift will differ from those in position-only catalogs.
  • Velocity-based classification will separate nearby over-densities more effectively than methods relying on position alone.
  • Two-point correlation functions of identified systems will remain consistent with standard catalogs.
  • Overall cosmological statistics will be preserved while internal characteristics of systems are refined.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The method could be applied to observational catalogs from surveys without simulation-specific tuning, provided positions and velocities are available.
  • It might reduce artificial merging of physically distinct systems in dense regions when studying group evolution.
  • Testing on different simulation resolutions or cosmologies could reveal whether the structural differences persist across datasets.
  • Combining the approach with other density estimators might extend its use beyond Voronoi tessellations.
  • keywords:[

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper introduces GraphShed, a group-finding algorithm that applies top-down watershed segmentation to separated Voronoi-induced graphs constructed from the IllustrisTNG100-1 simulation. The resulting catalog is compared to a standard Friends-of-Friends catalog from the same data. The authors report that the M200 distributions are statistically consistent, as are the two-point correlation function and mass function of the identified systems, while R200, sphericity, compactness, spin, and centroid shift differ significantly. They further claim that a velocity-based classification shows GraphShed better separates nearby over-densities that position-only methods would merge, concluding that the method preserves cosmological statistics while providing refined detection of galaxy systems and interactions.

Significance. If the central claim holds—that a genuinely parameter-free watershed procedure on Voronoi graphs yields catalogs whose cosmological statistics match FoF while differing in internal properties in a physically meaningful way—the result would be of moderate interest to the galaxy-group and large-scale-structure community. A threshold-free finder could reduce one source of systematic uncertainty in group catalogs used for cosmology and galaxy evolution studies. However, the absence of any quantitative metrics, error bars, or validation tests in the presented material makes it impossible to judge whether the reported differences are robust or merely method-specific artifacts.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim of statistical consistency in M200, two-point functions, and mass function is asserted without any reported quantitative measures (p-values, Kolmogorov-Smirnov statistics, sample sizes, or error bars). This absence directly prevents evaluation of whether the consistency is meaningful or merely consistent with large uncertainties.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract (method description): The load-bearing assertion that the algorithm is parameter-free rests on the claim that top-down watershed segmentation on separated Voronoi-induced graphs recognizes aggregations 'directly from the density field without tunable parameters or density thresholds.' No explicit enumeration of all algorithmic choices (graph connectivity definition, flooding order, separation criterion, or resolution cutoffs) is provided, so it is impossible to verify that the reported differences in R200, sphericity, etc., arise from the absence of thresholds rather than from unstated implementation decisions.
  3. [Abstract] Abstract: The velocity-based classification of interacting pairs is presented as evidence of improved separation, yet no quantitative comparison (e.g., fraction of pairs reclassified, velocity thresholds used, or contamination rates) is supplied. Without these numbers the claim that GraphShed offers 'improved separation' cannot be assessed against the FoF baseline.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract repeatedly uses 'statistically consistent' and 'significant differences' without defining the statistical tests or significance thresholds employed.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment point by point below, agreeing that additional quantitative details and clarifications are needed to strengthen the presentation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim of statistical consistency in M200, two-point functions, and mass function is asserted without any reported quantitative measures (p-values, Kolmogorov-Smirnov statistics, sample sizes, or error bars). This absence directly prevents evaluation of whether the consistency is meaningful or merely consistent with large uncertainties.

    Authors: We agree that the absence of explicit quantitative measures in the presented material limits evaluation of the claims. The manuscript does not currently report p-values, KS statistics, sample sizes, or error bars for these consistencies. In the revised version we will add these metrics (including KS p-values, sample sizes of the group catalogs, and appropriate error bars) both in the abstract and in the relevant results sections. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (method description): The load-bearing assertion that the algorithm is parameter-free rests on the claim that top-down watershed segmentation on separated Voronoi-induced graphs recognizes aggregations 'directly from the density field without tunable parameters or density thresholds.' No explicit enumeration of all algorithmic choices (graph connectivity definition, flooding order, separation criterion, or resolution cutoffs) is provided, so it is impossible to verify that the reported differences in R200, sphericity, etc., arise from the absence of thresholds rather than from unstated implementation decisions.

    Authors: We acknowledge that an explicit enumeration of algorithmic choices is required to fully substantiate the parameter-free claim. Although the manuscript describes the method as using fixed Voronoi graph construction and top-down watershed without user-tuned thresholds, it does not list all specific choices such as graph connectivity definition, flooding order, separation criterion, or resolution cutoffs. We will add a dedicated subsection in the Methods section providing this enumeration to demonstrate that none of these are tunable parameters. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The velocity-based classification of interacting pairs is presented as evidence of improved separation, yet no quantitative comparison (e.g., fraction of pairs reclassified, velocity thresholds used, or contamination rates) is supplied. Without these numbers the claim that GraphShed offers 'improved separation' cannot be assessed against the FoF baseline.

    Authors: We agree that quantitative comparisons are necessary to support the claim of improved separation via velocity-based classification. The current manuscript does not provide numbers such as the fraction of pairs reclassified, the specific velocity thresholds applied, or contamination rates relative to the simulation truth. In the revised manuscript we will include these quantitative metrics and direct comparisons to the FoF baseline. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; method is a new algorithm with empirical comparisons only

full rationale

The paper introduces GraphShed as a parameter-free group finder using top-down watershed segmentation on separated Voronoi-induced graphs, with no equations, derivations, or fitted parameters presented. Comparisons to FoF catalogs on IllustrisTNG100-1 are purely empirical (M200 consistency, differences in R200/sphericity/etc., consistent correlation functions), without any reduction of outputs to inputs by construction or self-citation chains. The parameter-free claim is a stated design property of the algorithm, not a self-definitional loop or renamed fit. No load-bearing steps match the enumerated circularity patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract supplies no equations, no explicit assumptions, and no description of any fitted quantities or new entities; ledger entries are therefore empty.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5769 in / 1142 out tokens · 24953 ms · 2026-06-28T08:25:40.276111+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

In this study, a parameter-free group-finding method named GraphShed is introduced and evaluated using the IllustrisTNG100-1 simulation. The method utilizes top-down watershed segmentation applied to the set of separated Voronoi-induced graphs, facilitating the recognition of aggregations directly from the density field without tunable parameters or density thresholds. A galaxy group catalog constructed with GraphShed is compared with a Friends-of-Friends catalog generated from the same dataset. The $M_{200}$ distributions of the two catalogs are statistically consistent; nevertheless, other structural properties, including $R_{200}$, sphericity, compactness, spin, and centroid shift show significant differences, suggesting that GraphShed could improve several internal characteristics of the identified systems. Conversely, the two-point correlation function and the mass function of the identified galaxy systems, derived from the aforementioned methods, show consistency. A velocity-based classification of interacting pairs indicates that GraphShed provides improved separation of nearby over-densities which might otherwise be considered as components of a single larger system in position-only methods due to their positional proximity. These results demonstrate that GraphShed effectively preserves cosmological statistics while offering a more refined detection of galaxy systems and their dynamical interactions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.03790 by M. H. Jalali Kanafi, P. Ghafour, S. Ansarifard, S. M. S. Movahed.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

95 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Then, for each potential merger candidate pair, the mass‑weighted radial and perpendicular relative velocities are computed as described in Appendix A

    (7) where members of the pair are denoted by the labels α and β. Then, for each potential merger candidate pair, the mass‑weighted radial and perpendicular relative velocities are computed as described in Appendix A. The pairs are subsequently classified according to these velocity components. A pair is flagged as a merger candidate if: V∥ α > 0, V∥ β > 0...

  2. [2]

    A., Aghanim, N., Arnaud, M., Ashdown, M., Aumont, J., Baccigalupi, C., Banday, A., Bar- reiro, R., Bartlett, J., Bartolo, N., et al

    Ade, P. A., Aghanim, N., Arnaud, M., Ashdown, M., Aumont, J., Baccigalupi, C., Banday, A., Bar- reiro, R., Bartlett, J., Bartolo, N., et al. (2016). Planck 2015 results-xiii. cosmological parameters. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 594:A13

    2016

  3. [3]

    J., Barreiro, R., Bartolo, N., Basak, S., et al

    Aghanim, N., Akrami, Y., Ashdown, M., Aumont, J., Baccigalupi, C., Ballardini, M., Banday, A. J., Barreiro, R., Bartolo, N., Basak, S., et al. (2020). Planck 2018 results-vi. cosmological parameters. As- tronomy & Astrophysics, 641:A6. 15

    2020

  4. [4]

    R., Murray, S

    Andrade-Santos, F., Jones, C., Forman, W. R., Murray, S. S., Kraft, R. P., Vikhlinin, A., Weeren, R. J. v., Nulsen, P. E., David, L. P., Dawson, W. A., et al. (2015). Chandra and xmm-newton obser- vations of the bimodal planck sz-detected cluster plckg345. 40-39.34 (a3716) with high and low en- tropy subcluster cores. The Astrophysical Journal, 803(2):108

    2015

  5. [5]

    Ansarifard, S. et al. (2020a). The Three Hundred Project: Correcting for the hydrostatic-equilibrium mass bias in X-ray and SZ surveys. Astron. Astro- phys., 634:A113

  6. [6]

    Ansarifard, S., Rasia, E., Biffi, V., Borgani, S., Cui, W., De Petris, M., Dolag, K., Ettori, S., Movahed, S., Murante, G., et al. (2020b). The three hundred project: Correcting for the hydrostatic-equilibrium mass bias in x-ray and sz surveys. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 634:A113

  7. [7]

    A., Jones, B

    Aragón-Calvo, M. A., Jones, B. J., Van De Wey- gaert, R., and Van Der Hulst, J. (2007). The multi- scale morphology filter: identifying and extracting spatial patterns in the galaxy distribution. Astron- omy & Astrophysics, 474(1):315–338

    2007

  8. [8]

    Artis, E., Bulbul, E., Grandis, S., Ghirardini, V., Clerc, N., Seppi, R., Comparat, J., Cataneo, M., Von Der Linden, A., Bahar, Y., et al. (2025). The srg/erosita all-sky survey-constraints on the struc- ture growth from cluster number counts. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 696:A5

    2025

  9. [9]

    Aurenhammer, F. (1991). Voronoi diagrams—a survey of a fundamental geometric data structure. ACM computing surveys (CSUR), 23(3):345–405

    1991

  10. [10]

    B., Dobkin, D

    Barber, C. B., Dobkin, D. P., and Huhdanpaa, H. (1996). The quickhull algorithm for convex hulls. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software (TOMS), 22(4):469–483

    1996

  11. [11]

    D., Bhavsar, S

    Barrow, J. D., Bhavsar, S. P., and Sonoda, D. (1985). Minimal spanning trees, filaments and galaxy clustering. Monthly Notices of the Royal As- tronomical Society, 216(1):17–35

    1985

  12. [12]

    A., Frieman, J., Weinberg, D

    Berlind, A. A., Frieman, J., Weinberg, D. H., Blan- ton, M. R., Warren, M. S., Abazajian, K., Scranton, R., Hogg, D. W., Scoccimarro, R., Bahcall, N. A., et al. (2006). Percolation galaxy groups and clusters in the sdss redshift survey: identification, catalogs, and the multiplicity function. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 167(1):1–25

    2006

  13. [13]

    Bernardeau, F., Colombi, S., Gaztañaga, E., and Scoccimarro, R. (2002). Large-scale structure of the universe and cosmological perturbation theory. Physics reports, 367(1-3):1–248

    2002

  14. [14]

    S., Jenkins, A., Helly, J., and Navarro, J

    Bett, P., Eke, V., Frenk, C. S., Jenkins, A., Helly, J., and Navarro, J. (2007). The spin and shape of dark matter haloes in the millennium simulation of a λ cold dark matter universe. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 376(1):215–232

    2007

  15. [15]

    Beucher, S. (1979). Use of watersheds in contour detection. In Proc. Int. Workshop on Image Pro- cessing, Sept. 1979, pages 17–21

    1979

  16. [16]

    Blanchard, A., Camera, S., Carbone, C., Car- done, V., Casas, S., Clesse, S., Ilić, S., Kilbinger, M., Kitching, T., Kunz, M., et al. (2020). Eu- clid preparation-vii. forecast validation for euclid cosmological probes. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 642:A191

    2020

  17. [17]

    Bocquet, S., Grandis, S., Bleem, L., Klein, M., Mohr, J., Schrabback, T., Abbott, T., Ade, P., Aguena, M., Alarcon, A., et al. (2024). Spt clus- ters with des and hst weak lensing. ii. cosmological constraints from the abundance of massive halos. Physical Review D, 110(8):083510

    2024

  18. [18]

    Bocquet, S., Saro, A., Dolag, K., and Mohr, J. J. (2016). Halo mass function: baryon impact, fitting formulae, and implications for cluster cosmology. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 456(3):2361–2373

    2016

  19. [19]

    R., Kofman, L., and Pogosyan, D

    Bond, J. R., Kofman, L., and Pogosyan, D. (1996). How filaments of galaxies are woven into the cosmic web. Nature, 380(6575):603–606

    1996

  20. [20]

    D., Jenkins, A., and Lemson, G

    Boylan-Kolchin, M., Springel, V., White, S. D., Jenkins, A., and Lemson, G. (2009). Resolving cos- mic structure formation with the millennium-ii sim- ulation. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 398(3):1150–1164

    2009

  21. [21]

    S., Dekel, A., Kolatt, T

    Bullock, J. S., Dekel, A., Kolatt, T. S., Kravtsov, A. V., Klypin, A. A., Porciani, C., and Primack, J. R. (2001). A universal angular momentum pro- file for galactic halos. The Astrophysical Journal, 555(1):240–257

    2001

  22. [22]

    Cautun, M., van de Weygaert, R., and Jones, B. J. (2013). Nexus: tracing the cosmic web connection. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 429(2):1286–1308

    2013

  23. [23]

    Chiu, I.-N., Klein, M., Mohr, J., and Bocquet, S. (2023). Cosmological constraints from galaxy clus- ters and groups in the erosita final equatorial depth survey. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 522(2):1601–1642

    2023

  24. [24]

    and Hickey, T

    Cohen, J. and Hickey, T. (1979). Two algorithms for determining volumes of convex polyhedra. Journal of the ACM (JACM), 26(3):401–414

    1979

  25. [25]

    collaboration, D., Adame, A., Aguilar, J., Ahlen, S., Alam, S., Aldering, G., Alexander, D., Alfarsy, R., Allende Prieto, C., Alvarez, M., et al. (2024). The early data release of the dark energy spectroscopic instrument. The Astronomical Journal, 168(2):58

    2024

  26. [26]

    Colless, M., Dalton, G., Maddox, S., Sutherland, W., Norberg, P., Cole, S., Bland-Hawthorn, J., Bridges, T., Cannon, R., Collins, C., et al. (2001). The 2df galaxy redshift survey: spectra and red- shifts. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 328(4):1039–1063

    2001

  27. [27]

    Contreras-Santos, A., Knebe, A., Pearce, F., Hag- gar, R., Gray, M., Cui, W., Yepes, G., De Petris, M., De Luca, F., Power, C., et al. (2022). The three hundred project: galaxy cluster mergers and their impact on the stellar component of brightest cluster galaxies. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomi- 16 cal Society, 511(2):2897–2913

    2022

  28. [28]

    J., Gao, L., and White, S

    Croton, D. J., Gao, L., and White, S. D. (2007). Halo assembly bias and its effects on galaxy clus- tering. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 374(4):1303–1309

    2007

  29. [29]

    S., and White, S

    Davis, M., Efstathiou, G., Frenk, C. S., and White, S. D. (1985). The evolution of large-scale structure in a universe dominated by cold dark matter. As- trophysical Journal, Part 1 (ISSN 0004-637X), vol. 292, May 15, 1985, p. 371-394. Research supported by the Science and Engineering Research Council of England and NASA., 292:371–394

    1985

  30. [30]

    W., and Tonry, J

    Davis, M., Huchra, J., Latham, D. W., and Tonry, J. (1982). A survey of galaxy redshifts. ii-the large scale space distribution. Astrophysical Journal, Part 1, vol. 253, Feb. 15, 1982, p. 423-445., 253:423–445

    1982

  31. [31]

    M., et al

    Dolag, K., Remus, R.-S., Valenzuela, L. M., Kim- mig, L. C., Seidel, B., Fortune, S., Stoiber, J., Ivleva, A., Hoffmann, T., Biffi, V., et al. (2025). Encyclopedia magneticum: Scaling relations from cosmic dawn to present day. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.01061

    work page arXiv 2025

  32. [32]

    Dougherty, E. (1992). Mathematical morphology in image processing. CRC press

    1992

  33. [33]

    R., and Lee, C

    Dragomir, R., Rodríguez-Puebla, A., Primack, J. R., and Lee, C. T. (2018). Does the galaxy–halo connection vary with environment? Monthly No- tices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 476(1):741– 758

    2018

  34. [34]

    C., Johnson, S., Richard, J., Brinch- mann, J., Boogaard, L

    Epinat, B., Contini, T., Mercier, W., Ciesla, L., Lemaux, B. C., Johnson, S., Richard, J., Brinch- mann, J., Boogaard, L. A., Carton, D., et al. (2024). Magic: Muse galaxy groups in cosmos–a survey to probe the impact of environment on galaxy evolu- tion over the last 8 gyr. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 683:A205

    2024

  35. [35]

    Ertöz, L., Steinbach, M., and Kumar, V. (2003). Finding clusters of different sizes, shapes, and den- sities in noisy, high dimensional data. In Proceed- ings of the 2003 SIAM international conference on data mining, pages 47–58. SIAM

    2003

  36. [36]

    Ester, M., Kriegel, H.-P., Sander, J., Xu, X., et al. (1996). A density-based algorithm for discovering clusters in large spatial databases with noise. In kdd, volume 96, pages 226–231

    1996

  37. [37]

    L., Neyrinck, M

    Falck, B. L., Neyrinck, M. C., and Szalay, A. S. (2012). Origami: delineating halos using phase- space folds. The Astrophysical Journal, 754(2):126

    2012

  38. [38]

    Fan, K. (1984). Some properties of convex sets re- lated to fixed point theorems. Mathematische An- nalen, 266(4):519–537

    1984

  39. [39]

    Fernandez, J., Alonso, S., Mesa, V., and Duplancic, F. (2024). Revealing ringed galaxies in group envi- ronments. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 683:A32

    2024

  40. [40]

    Genel, S., Bouché, N., Naab, T., Sternberg, A., and Genzel, R. (2010). The growth of dark matter ha- los: evidence for significant smooth accretion. The Astrophysical Journal, 719(1):229–239

    2010

  41. [41]

    and Tavasoli, S

    Ghafour, P. and Tavasoli, S. (2025). Gravipast’s lens to the past: Unveiling the evolution of filamentary structures. The Astrophysical Journal, 990(2):119

    2025

  42. [42]

    Ghafour, P., Tavasoli, S., and Shojaei, M. R. (2025). Vega: Voids identification using genetic algorithm. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2025(12):001

    2025

  43. [43]

    Graham, M. T. and Cappellari, M. (2023). A group finder algorithm optimised for the study of local galaxy environments. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 675:A161

    2023

  44. [44]

    Gurzadyan, V., Fimin, N., and Chechetkin, V. (2025). Cosmic voids and the kinetic analysis-iv. hubble tension and the cosmological constant. As- tronomy & Astrophysics, 694:A252

    2025

  45. [45]

    Guth, A. H. (1981). Inflationary universe: A pos- sible solution to the horizon and flatness problems. Physical Review D, 23(2):347

    1981

  46. [46]

    M., and Dekel, A

    Hahn, O., Porciani, C., Carollo, C. M., and Dekel, A. (2007). Properties of dark matter haloes in clus- ters, filaments, sheets and voids. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 375(2):489–499

    2007

  47. [47]

    and Burkert, A

    Hetznecker, H. and Burkert, A. (2006). The evolu- tion of the dark halo spin parameters λ and λ￿ in a λcdm universe: the role of minor and major mergers. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 370(4):1905–1914

    2006

  48. [48]

    C., Dey, A., Barabási, A.- L., Vogelsberger, M., Hernquist, L., and Gebhardt, K

    Hong, S., Coutinho, B. C., Dey, A., Barabási, A.- L., Vogelsberger, M., Hernquist, L., and Gebhardt, K. (2016). Discriminating topology in galaxy distri- butions using network analysis. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 459(3):2690–2700

    2016

  49. [49]

    and Dey, A

    Hong, S. and Dey, A. (2015). Network analysis of cosmic structures: network centrality and topologi- cal environment. Monthly Notices of the Royal As- tronomical Society, 450(2):1999–2015

    2015

  50. [50]

    and Geller, M

    Huchra, J. and Geller, M. (1982). Groups of galax- ies. i-nearby groups. Astrophysical Journal, Part 1, vol. 257, June 15, 1982, p. 423-437. Research sup- ported by Cambridge University., 257:423–437

    1982

  51. [51]

    Jarvis, R. A. and Patrick, E. A. (2006). Clus- tering using a similarity measure based on shared near neighbors. IEEE Transactions on computers, 100(11):1025–1034

    2006

  52. [52]

    and Forman, W

    Jones, C. and Forman, W. (1999). Einstein observa- tory images of clusters of galaxies. The Astrophysi- cal Journal, 511(1):65–83

    1999

  53. [53]

    Jones, C., Forman, W., and Fabian, A. (1992). Clus- ters and superclusters of galaxies. by AC Fabian (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1992), NATO Adv. Sci. Inst. Ser. C, 366:49

    1992

  54. [54]

    Kang, X., Jing, Y., Mo, H., and Börner, G. (2005). Semianalytical model of galaxy formation with high- resolution n-body simulations. The Astrophysical Journal, 631(1):21–40

    2005

  55. [55]

    R., Lux, H., Ascasibar, Y., Behroozi, P., Casado, J., Moran, C

    Knebe, A., Pearce, F. R., Lux, H., Ascasibar, Y., Behroozi, P., Casado, J., Moran, C. C., Diemand, J., Dolag, K., Dominguez-Tenreiro, R., et al. (2013). Structure finding in cosmological simulations: the state of affairs. Monthly Notices of the Royal As- 17 tronomical Society, 435(2):1618–1658

    2013

  56. [56]

    Korytov, D., Rangel, E., Bleem, L., Frontiere, N., Habib, S., Heitmann, K., Hollowed, J., and Pope, A. (2023). Modeling the galaxy distribution in clusters using halo cores. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.04194

    work page arXiv 2023

  57. [57]

    J., and Ruiz, A

    Levis, S., Coenda, V., Muriel, H., de los Rios, M., Ragone-Figueroa, C., Martínez, H. J., and Ruiz, A. N. (2025). Galaxy evolution in groups: Tran- sition galaxies in the illustristng simulations. As- tronomy & Astrophysics, 698:A57

    2025

  58. [58]

    I., Van De Weygaert, R., Cautun, M., Falck, B., Tempel, E., Abel, T., Alpaslan, M., Aragón-Calvo, M

    Libeskind, N. I., Van De Weygaert, R., Cautun, M., Falck, B., Tempel, E., Abel, T., Alpaslan, M., Aragón-Calvo, M. A., Forero-Romero, J. E., Gon- zalez, R., et al. (2018). Tracing the cosmic web. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 473(1):1195–1217

    2018

  59. [59]

    Liddle, A. R. and Lyth, D. H. (1993). The cold dark matter density perturbation. Physics Reports, 231(1-2):1–105

    1993

  60. [60]

    Marini, I., Popesso, P., Dolag, K., Bravo, M., Robotham, A., Tempel, E., Li, Q., Yang, X., Csizi, B., Behroozi, P., et al. (2025). Detecting clusters and groups of galaxies populating the local universe in large optical spectroscopic surveys. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 694:A207

    2025

  61. [61]

    Science-Driven Optimization of the LSST Observing Strategy

    Marshall, P., Anguita, T., Bianco, F. B., Bellm, E. C., Brandt, N., Clarkson, W., Connolly, A., Ga- wiser, E., Ivezic, Z., Jones, L., et al. (2017). Science- driven optimization of the lsst observing strategy. arXiv preprint arXiv:1708.04058

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  62. [62]

    Massey Jr, F. J. (1951). The kolmogorov-smirnov test for goodness of fit. Journal of the American statistical Association, 46(253):68–78

    1951

  63. [63]

    and Parker, L

    Masson, F. and Parker, L. C. (2026). Calibrating galaxy infall times in groups and clusters with il- lustristng simulations. The Astrophysical Journal, 1000(2):194

    2026

  64. [64]

    V., Dalal, N., and Gottlöber, S

    More, S., Kravtsov, A. V., Dalal, N., and Gottlöber, S. (2011). The overdensity and masses of the friends- of-friends halos and universality of halo mass func- tion. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 195(1):4

    2011

  65. [65]

    F., Griffen, B., et al

    Nelson, D., Pillepich, A., Genel, S., Vogelsberger, M., Springel, V., Torrey, P., Rodriguez-Gomez, V., Sijacki, D., Snyder, G. F., Griffen, B., et al. (2015). The illustris simulation: Public data release. As- tronomy and Computing, 13:12–37

    2015

  66. [66]

    Nelson, D., Springel, V., Pillepich, A., Rodriguez- Gomez, V., Torrey, P., Genel, S., Vogelsberger, Pakmor, R., Marinacci, F., Weinberger, R., et al. (2019). The illustristng simulations: public data re- lease. Computational Astrophysics and Cosmology, 6:1–29

    2019

  67. [67]

    P., Guillet, T., Pfrommer, C., Bose, S., Barrera, M., Del- gado, A

    Pakmor, R., Springel, V., Coles, J. P., Guillet, T., Pfrommer, C., Bose, S., Barrera, M., Del- gado, A. M., Ferlito, F., Frenk, C., et al. (2023). The millenniumtng project: the hydrodynamical full physics simulation and a first look at its galaxy clus- ters. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 524(2):2539–2555

    2023

  68. [68]

    Peebles, P. (1973). Statistical analysis of catalogs of extragalactic objects. i. theory. Astrophysical Jour- nal, Vol. 185, pp. 413-440 (1973), 185:413–440

    1973

  69. [69]

    Peebles, P. J. (1969). Origin of the angular momen- tum of galaxies. Astrophysical Journal, vol. 155, p. 393, 155:393

    1969

  70. [70]

    Peebles, P. J. E. (2020). The large-scale structure of the universe, volume 96. Princeton university press

    2020

  71. [71]

    R., Carreres, B., Carr, A., Scolnic, D., Bailey, A., Davis, T

    Peterson, E. R., Carreres, B., Carr, A., Scolnic, D., Bailey, A., Davis, T. M., Brout, D., Howlett, C., Jones, D. O., Riess, A. G., et al. (2025). Improving the determination of supernova cosmological red- shifts by using galaxy groups. The Astrophysical Journal, 980(1):21

    2025

  72. [72]

    J., Kenyon, S

    Pizzardo, M., Geller, M. J., Kenyon, S. J., Dam- janov, I., and Diaferio, A. (2023). An illustristng view of the caustic technique for galaxy cluster mass estimation. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 675:A56

    2023

  73. [73]

    Platen, E., Van De Weygaert, R., and Jones, B. J. (2007). A cosmic watershed: the wvf void detection technique. Monthly notices of the royal astronomical society, 380(2):551–570

    2007

  74. [74]

    M., and Tully, R

    Pomarede, D., Hoffman, Y., Courtois, H. M., and Tully, R. B. (2017). The cosmic v-web. The Astro- physical Journal, 845(1):55

    2017

  75. [75]

    B., Fardal, M

    Poole, G. B., Fardal, M. A., Babul, A., McCarthy, I. G., Quinn, T., and Wadsley, J. (2006). The im- pact of mergers on relaxed x-ray clusters–i. dynam- ical evolution and emergent transient structures. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 373(3):881–905

    2006

  76. [76]

    Pranav, P. (2021). Topology and geometry of gaus- sian random fields ii: on critical points, excur- sion sets, and persistent homology. arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.08721

    work page arXiv 2021

  77. [77]

    J., Adler, R

    Pranav, P., Van de Weygaert, R., Vegter, G., Jones, B. J., Adler, R. J., Feldbrugge, J., Park, C., Buchert, T., and Kerber, M. (2019). Topology and geometry of gaussian random fields i: On betti numbers, euler characteristic, and minkowski func- tionals. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 485(3):4167–4208

    2019

  78. [78]

    Seppi, R., Comparat, J., Ghirardini, V., Garrel, C., Artis, E., Sanchez, A., Liu, A., Clerc, N., Bulbul, E., Grandis, S., et al. (2024). The srg/erosita all- sky survey-tracing the large-scale structure with a clustering study of galaxy clusters. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 686:A196

    2024

  79. [79]

    Shandarin, S. F. and Zeldovich, Y. B. (1989). The large-scale structure of the universe: Turbu- lence, intermittency, structures in a self-gravitating medium. Reviews of Modern Physics, 61(2):185

    1989

  80. [80]

    J., Chang, C., Pandey, S., Salcedo, A., Weinberg, D., Amsellem, A., Battaglia, N., et al

    Shin, T.-h., Jain, B., Adhikari, S., Baxter, E. J., Chang, C., Pandey, S., Salcedo, A., Weinberg, D., Amsellem, A., Battaglia, N., et al. (2021). The mass and galaxy distribution around sz-selected clusters. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 507(4):5758–5779. 18

    2021

Showing first 80 references.