RedditPersona: A Modular Framework for Community-Conditioned LLM Adaptation from Reddit

Ali Goodarzi; Amirhossein Ghaffari; Ekaterina Gilman; Huong Nguyen; Lauri Lov\'en; Simo Hosio

RedditPersona: A Modular Framework for Community-Conditioned LLM Adaptation from Reddit

T0 review · 2 major / 0 minor · reviewed 2026-06-28 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Community-conditioned LLM adapters show identifiability that tracks each grouping strategy's agreement with the subreddit baseline, plus a consistent trade-off with distributional similarity to real text.

desk verdict RedditPersona standardizes five partitioning strategies plus shared metrics for Reddit LLM adaptation and ships the code, but the identifiability claim needs an independent agreement measure to avoid circularity. read the letter →

arxiv 2606.06027 v1 pith:X6DC5NWC submitted 2026-06-04 cs.AI cs.CLcs.LGcs.SI

Amirhossein Ghaffari , Ali Goodarzi , Huong Nguyen , Simo Hosio , Lauri Lovén , Ekaterina Gilman This is my paper

classification cs.AIcs.CLcs.LGcs.SI

keywords communityadaptationLLMadaptersRedditdatausergroupingstrategiesparameter-efficientfine-tuningbehavioralidentifiabilitydistributionalsimilarity

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The work introduces a standardized process for gathering Reddit posts and comments, defining communities via multiple grouping approaches, training efficient adapters on those groups, and testing them with one set of metrics. It demonstrates that how distinctly an adapter behaves like its target community depends on how closely the chosen grouping method matches the original subreddit structure. This matters because prior studies each picked their own data and definitions independently, making it difficult to know which choices produce better or comparable results. By fixing the pipeline, the approach reveals patterns that hold across the tested strategies rather than isolated cases.

What carries the argument

Five user partitioning strategies (subreddit-based, graph-structural, semantic, hybrid, and interaction-based) used to train parameter-efficient adapters that are then scored on a shared suite covering fluency, fidelity, distributional alignment, and community identifiability.

What would settle it

An experiment in which at least one grouping strategy produces adapters whose identifiability level does not increase with greater measured agreement to the subreddit baseline, or in which the identifiability-similarity trade-off fails to appear under the same metric definitions.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Applied to 112 subreddits yielding 301,429 user profiles and over 16 million comments, the framework establishes that the behavioral identifiability of the resulting adapters follows the intrinsic agreement of each grouping strategy with the subreddit baseline, while a trade-off between identifiability and distributional similarity to real text remains consistent across all five strategies.

Load-bearing premise

The five grouping strategies together with the chosen metrics form a representative and unbiased sample of ways to define communities and measure adaptation outcomes.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Each grouping strategy produces a distinct level of adapter identifiability that corresponds directly to its measured agreement with the subreddit baseline.
Higher identifiability is accompanied by reduced similarity between generated text and the distribution of actual user posts and comments.
The modular pipeline permits side-by-side comparison of different community definitions under fixed data collection and evaluation conditions.
Adapters trained this way can be reused or swapped once the grouping choice and metrics are fixed.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the observed trade-off generalizes, users may need to decide in advance whether to favor community-specific behavior or closer resemblance to everyday language.
The same modular structure could be used to test additional grouping methods or new metrics without rebuilding the entire collection and training steps.
Patterns found here might appear when the same standardization is applied to data from other social platforms or discussion domains.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The main takeaway is that this paper supplies a concrete, reusable pipeline for community-conditioned adaptation on Reddit. It pulls posts and comments, builds user profiles, applies five grouping methods (subreddit, graph, semantic, hybrid, interaction), trains QLoRA adapters, and scores everything on the same axes of fluency, fidelity, distributional match, and identifiability. The scale is respectable: 112 subreddits, 301k profiles, 16M comments, all in the urban well-being slice, with code and configs released.

What is actually new is the side-by-side comparison of those five strategies under one metric suite rather than scattered one-off studies. That setup lets them observe a consistent trade-off between how identifiable the adapter is and how close its output distribution stays to real subreddit text. The work is empirical and artifact-driven, which counts as real value for anyone who might otherwise rebuild similar tooling from scratch.

The soft spot sits in the central empirical claim. The paper states that identifiability tracks each strategy's intrinsic agreement with the subreddit baseline. If that agreement is computed with any of the same embedding, next-token, or divergence metrics used for identifiability, the tracking result becomes partly definitional instead of a substantive finding about the grouping methods. The abstract gives no sign of an orthogonal measure such as raw partition overlap or graph distance, so the result needs explicit verification in the methods section.

The evaluation is also confined to one narrow domain, and the summary mentions no error bars or statistical tests. Those are fixable but matter for judging whether the trade-off is robust.

This is for researchers already doing social-media or community-specific LLM work who need a common baseline or starting code. It is coherent enough on its own terms to deserve referee time rather than a desk reject; the framework and data release give reviewers something concrete to check.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper introduces RedditPersona, a modular framework that collects Reddit posts/comments from 112 urban well-being subreddits (301,429 user profiles, 16M+ comments), profiles active users, partitions them under five grouping strategies (subreddit-based, graph-structural, semantic, hybrid, interaction-based), trains a QLoRA adapter per strategy, and evaluates all adapters under a shared metric suite covering fluency, fidelity, distributional alignment, and community identifiability. The central empirical claims are that adapters' behavioral identifiability tracks each strategy's intrinsic agreement with the subreddit baseline and that a consistent trade-off between identifiability and distributional similarity to real text holds across all five strategies. Code and configuration files are released.

Significance. If the results hold, the work supplies a reusable, standardized pipeline for community-conditioned LLM adaptation that enables direct comparison of grouping assumptions across studies. The public release of code and configs is a concrete strength that supports reproducibility and artifact reuse in an area where such standardization has been absent.

major comments (2)

[Abstract] Abstract: the claim that 'adapters' behavioral identifiability tracks each strategy's intrinsic agreement with the subreddit baseline' is load-bearing for the main empirical contribution. The manuscript must explicitly define how 'intrinsic agreement' is computed and demonstrate that this measure is independent of the identifiability metrics in the shared suite (e.g., does not reuse embedding cosine, next-token prediction, or distributional divergence components). Without this separation the reported tracking is at risk of being partly definitional.
[Abstract] Abstract and evaluation description: the reported findings on a large dataset are presented without reference to statistical tests, confidence intervals, error bars, or pre-specified data exclusion rules. This omission prevents assessment of whether the claimed trade-off between identifiability and distributional similarity is robust to sampling variation or post-hoc analytic choices.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback on definitional clarity and statistical reporting. We address both major comments below and will revise the manuscript accordingly to strengthen the presentation of the core claims.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that 'adapters' behavioral identifiability tracks each strategy's intrinsic agreement with the subreddit baseline' is load-bearing for the main empirical contribution. The manuscript must explicitly define how 'intrinsic agreement' is computed and demonstrate that this measure is independent of the identifiability metrics in the shared suite (e.g., does not reuse embedding cosine, next-token prediction, or distributional divergence components). Without this separation the reported tracking is at risk of being partly definitional.

Authors: We agree the abstract claim requires explicit support. In the revision we will (1) expand the abstract to define intrinsic agreement as the normalized mutual information between each grouping strategy's user partitions and the original subreddit labels, and (2) add a short methods subsection that computes this agreement metric on the raw user-subreddit incidence matrix before any adapter training or evaluation metrics are applied. We will explicitly verify and report that the agreement computation uses only partition overlap and does not incorporate embedding cosine, next-token loss, or any distributional divergence terms from the identifiability suite, thereby establishing independence. revision: yes
Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and evaluation description: the reported findings on a large dataset are presented without reference to statistical tests, confidence intervals, error bars, or pre-specified data exclusion rules. This omission prevents assessment of whether the claimed trade-off between identifiability and distributional similarity is robust to sampling variation or post-hoc analytic choices.

Authors: We accept this point. The revision will add: bootstrap-derived 95% confidence intervals and standard errors for all reported correlations and trade-off slopes; a Pearson or Spearman correlation test (with p-values) for the identifiability-tracking claim; and a clear statement of pre-specified exclusion rules (minimum 50 comments per user profile and subreddit activity thresholds). Error bars will be included on the relevant figures, and the methods section will document these choices as fixed prior to analysis. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; empirical evaluation against external data

full rationale

The paper presents an empirical framework that collects real Reddit data (301k+ user profiles, 16M+ comments across 112 subreddits), applies five grouping strategies, trains QLoRA adapters, and evaluates them on a shared metric suite for fluency, fidelity, alignment, and identifiability. The reported observation that identifiability tracks intrinsic agreement with the subreddit baseline is framed as an experimental finding from these runs, not a definitional equivalence or fitted parameter renamed as prediction. No equations, derivations, self-citation load-bearing uniqueness theorems, or ansatzes smuggled via prior work appear in the provided text. The work is self-contained against external benchmarks (actual subreddit text) and receives the default non-circularity outcome.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 0 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Abstract supplies no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; all details on modeling choices, metric definitions, and data processing remain unavailable.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of RedditPersona: A Modular Framework for Community-Conditioned LLM Adaptation from Reddit." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/X6DC5NWC

@misc{pith2026260606027,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: RedditPersona: A Modular Framework for Community-Conditioned LLM Adaptation from Reddit},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/X6DC5NWC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2606.06027}
}

read the original abstract

Community-conditioned language model adaptation requires choices about data collection, community definition, and evaluation that are currently made independently in each study, making it hard to compare assumptions or reuse artifacts. We present RedditPersona, a modular framework that standardizes these choices: it collects Reddit posts and comments, profiles active users, partitions them under five grouping strategies (subreddit-based, graph-structural, semantic, hybrid, and interaction-based), trains a parameter-efficient adapter per strategy via QLoRA, and evaluates them under a shared metric suite spanning fluency, fidelity, distributional alignment, and community identifiability. Applied to 112 subreddits in the urban well-being domain (301,429 user profiles, 16M+ comments), we find that adapters' behavioral identifiability tracks each strategy's intrinsic agreement with the subreddit baseline, and that a consistent trade-off between identifiability and distributional similarity to real text holds across all five strategies. The code and configuration files are available at: https://github.com/Ahghaffari/redditpersona.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.06027 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** RedditPersona pipeline each subreddit is its own multi-membership community; (S2) a graph strategy that projects the bipartite user-subreddit graph into a sparse user-user similarity graph and partitions it with Leiden [33] (Louvain [3] fallback); (S3) a semantic strategy that embeds each user’s text corpus and clusters via 𝐾-means [25] with a silhouette [8] over configurable 𝐾; (S4) a hybrid strategy that linearly… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 14 canonical work pages

[1]

Hui Bai, Jan G Voelkel, Shane Muldowney, Johannes C Eichstaedt, and Robb Willer. 2025. LLM-generated messages can persuade humans on policy issues. Nature Communications16, 1 (2025), 6037

2025
[2]

Atmika M Banerjee and Keka Mukhopadhyaya. 2025. Fine-Tuning Large Lan- guage Models for Personality Development. In2025 9th International Conference on Electronics, Communication and Aerospace Technology (ICECA). IEEE, 2109– 2116

2025
[3]

Vincent D Blondel, Jean-Loup Guillaume, Renaud Lambiotte, and Etienne Lefeb- vre. 2008. Fast unfolding of communities in large networks.Journal of statistical mechanics: theory and experiment2008, 10 (2008), P10008

2008
[4]

Azza Bouleimen, Giordano De Marzo, Taehee Kim, Nicolo Pagan, Hannah Metzler, Silvia Giordano, and David Garcia. 2025. The Collective Turing Test: Large Language Models Can Generate Realistic Multi-User Discussions.arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.08592(2025)

work page arXiv 2025
[5]

Aurélien Bück-Kaeffer, Je Qin Chooi, Dan Zhao, Maximilian Puelma Touzel, Kellin Pelrine, Jean-François Godbout, Reihaneh Rabbany, and Zachary Yang
[6]

BluePrint: A Social Media User Dataset for LLM Persona Evaluation and Training.arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.02343(2025)

work page arXiv 2025
[7]

Tim Dettmers, Artidoro Pagnoni, Ari Holtzman, and Luke Zettlemoyer. 2023. Qlora: Efficient finetuning of quantized llms.Advances in neural information processing systems36 (2023), 10088–10115

2023
[8]

Wen Dong and Fairul Mohd-Zaid. 2025. Simulating and Evaluating Generative Modeling and Collaborative Filtering in Complex Social Networks. InProceedings of the 24th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. 639–648

2025

Show all 40 references

[9]

Andrzej Dudek. 2019. Silhouette index as clustering evaluation tool. InConference of the section on classification and data analysis of the polish statistical association. Springer, 19–33

2019
[10]

Amirhossein Ghaffari, Susanna Pirttikangas, and Ekaterina Gilman. 2025. Un- derstanding Well-Being in Urban Context: A Survey.IEEE Access13 (2025), 11136–11158

2025
[11]

Edward J Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu, Yuanzhi Li, Shean Wang, Liang Wang, Weizhu Chen, et al. 2022. Lora: Low-rank adaptation of large language models.Iclr1, 2 (2022), 3

2022
[12]

Linmei Hu, Hongyu He, Duokang Wang, Ziwang Zhao, Yingxia Shao, and Liqiang Nie. 2024. LLM vs Small Model? Large Language Model Based Text Augmen- tation Enhanced Personality Detection Model. InAAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

2024
[13]

Zhengyu Hu, Jianxun Lian, Zheyuan Xiao, Max Xiong, Yuxuan Lei, Tianfu Wang, Kaize Ding, Ziang Xiao, Nicholas Jing Yuan, and Xing Xie. 2025. Population- aligned persona generation for llm-based social simulation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.10127(2025)

2025
[14]

Renhong Huang, Ning Tang, Jiarong Xu, Yuxuan Cao, Qingqian Tu, Sheng Guo, Bo Zheng, Huiyuan Liu, and Yang Yang. 2026. PolicySim: An LLM-Based Agent Social Simulation Sandbox for Proactive Policy Optimization. InProceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2026. 4781–4792

2026
[15]

Clayton Hutto and Eric Gilbert. 2014. Vader: A parsimonious rule-based model for sentiment analysis of social media text. InProceedings of the international AAAI conference on web and social media, Vol. 8. 216–225

2014
[16]

Hamed Jelodar, Yongli Wang, Chi Yuan, Xia Feng, Xiahui Jiang, Yanchao Li, and Liang Zhao. 2019. Latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA) and topic modeling: models, applications, a survey.Multimedia tools and applications78, 11 (2019), 15169–15211

2019
[17]

Julie Jiang and Emilio Ferrara. 2025. Social-llm: Modeling user behavior at scale using language models and social network data.Sci7, 4 (2025), 138

2025
[18]

Akaash Kolluri, Shengguang Wu, Joon Sung Park, and Michael S Bernstein. 2025. Finetuning llms for human behavior prediction in social science experiments. InProceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 30084–30099

2025
[19]

Jiwei Li, Michel Galley, Chris Brockett, Jianfeng Gao, and William B Dolan. 2016. A diversity-promoting objective function for neural conversation models. In Proceedings of the 2016 conference of the North American chapter of the association for computational linguistics: huma...

2016
[20]

Mao Li and Frederick G Conrad. 2026. Persona-Based Simulation of Human Opinion at Population Scale.arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.27056(2026)

2026
[21]

Zheyu Li, Pengfei Cao, Daojian Zeng, Kang Liu, and Jun Zhao. 2026. Imitation Game: Toward Comprehensive Evaluation on Personalized Role-Playing on Social Media. https://openreview.net/forum?id=cFOHJN8dd6

2026
[22]

Jiayu Lin and Zhongyu Wei. 2026. CommunityBench: Benchmarking Community- Level Alignment across Diverse Groups and Tasks.arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.13669 (2026)

2026
[23]

Edoardo Loru, Jacopo Nudo, Niccolò Di Marco, Alessandro Santirocchi, Roberto Atzeni, Matteo Cinelli, Vincenzo Cestari, Clelia Rossi-Arnaud, and Walter Quat- trociocchi. 2025. The simulation of judgment in LLMs.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences122, 42 (2025), e2518443122

2025
[24]

Stephanie Anneris Malvicini, Ewelina Gajewska, Arda Derbent, Katarzyna Budzynska, JarosĹ Chudziak, and Maria Vanina Martinez. 2026. A Natural Language Agentic Approach to Study Affective Polarization.arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.02711(2026)

2026
[25]

2023.explosion/spaCy: v3.7.2: Fixes for APIs and requirements

Ines Montani, Matthew Honnibal, Adriane Boyd, Sofie Van Landeghem, and Henning Peters. 2023.explosion/spaCy: v3.7.2: Fixes for APIs and requirements. doi:10.5281/zenodo.10009823

2023 doi
[26]

Fabian Pedregosa, Gaël Varoquaux, Alexandre Gramfort, Vincent Michel, Bertrand Thirion, Olivier Grisel, Mathieu Blondel, Peter Prettenhofer, Ron Weiss, Vincent Dubourg, et al . 2011. Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python.the Journal of machine Learning research12 (2011), 2825–2830

2011
[27]

Krishna Pillutla, Swabha Swayamdipta, Rowan Zellers, John Thickstun, Sean Welleck, Yejin Choi, and Zaid Harchaoui. 2021. Mauve: Measuring the gap between neural text and human text using divergence frontiers.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems34 (2021), 4816–4828

2021
[28]

Shahzad Qaiser and Ramsha Ali. 2018. Text mining: use of TF-IDF to examine the relevance of words to documents.International journal of computer applications 181, 1 (2018), 25–29

2018
[29]

Qiqi Qiang. 2025. Emotion Diffusion in Real and Simulated Social Graphs: Struc- tural Limits of LLM-Based Social Simulation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.21138 (2025)

2025
[30]

Nils Schwager, Simon Münker, Alistair Plum, and Achim Rettinger. 2026. Towards Simulating Social Media Users with LLMs: Evaluating the Operational Validity of Conditioned Comment Prediction. InThe Proceedings for the 15th Workshop on Computational Approaches to Subjectivity, S...

2026
[31]

Lingzhi Shen, Yunfei Long, Xiaohao Cai, Guanming Chen, Imran Razzak, and Shoaib Jameel. 2025. Less but Better: Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning of Large Language Models for Personality Detection.2025 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN)(2025), 1–8

2025
[32]

Abdul Sittar, Miha Češnovar, Alenka Guček, and Marko Grobelnik. 2026. Con- structing a Dataset to Support Agent-Based Modeling of Online Interactions: Users, Topics, and Interaction Networks.IEEE Access14 (2026), 52890–52910. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2026.3679263

2026 doi
[33]

Andrés Martínez Torres and Davide Morselli. 2026. Phenomenologically hu- man: Fine-tuning LLMs to simulate online group identity.Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans7 (2026), 100272

2026
[34]

Vincent A Traag, Ludo Waltman, and Nees Jan Van Eck. 2019. From Louvain to Leiden: guaranteeing well-connected communities.Scientific reports9, 1 (2019), 5233

2019
[35]

V Vendetti, LD Comencini, F Deriu, V Modugno, et al. 2025. Passing the turing test in political discourse: Fine-tuning llms to mimic polarized social media comments. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.14645(2025)

2025
[36]

2020.TRL: Transformers Reinforcement Learning

Leandro von Werra, Younes Belkada, Lewis Tunstall, Edward Beeching, Tristan Thrush, Nathan Lambert, Shengyi Huang, Kashif Rasul, and Quentin Gallouédec. 2020.TRL: Transformers Reinforcement Learning. https://github.com/huggingface/ trl

2020
[37]

Shirley Wu, Evelyn Choi, Arpandeep Khatua, Zhanghan Wang, Joy He-Yueya, Tharindu Cyril Weerasooriya, Wei Wei, Diyi Yang, Jure Leskovec, and James Zou. 2026. HumanLM: Simulating Users with State Alignment Beats Response Imitation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.03303(2026)

2026
[38]

Xiaoyu Zhan, Xinyu Fu, Hao Sun, Yuanqi Li, Jie Guo, and Yanwen Guo. 2025. Test-Time-Matching: Decouple Personality, Memory, and Linguistic Style in LLM- based Role-Playing Language Agent.arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.16799(2025)

2025
[39]

Tianyi Zhang, Varsha Kishore, Felix Wu, Kilian Q Weinberger, and Yoav Artzi. 2019. Bertscore: Evaluating text generation with bert.arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.09675(2019)

2019 arXiv
[40]

Jianfeng Zhu, Julina Maharjan, Xinyu Li, Karin G Coifman, and Ruoming Jin. 2025. Evaluating LLM alignment on personality inference from real-world interview data.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.13244(2025). Received 20 February 2007; revised 12 March 2009; accepted 5 June 2009

2025

Pith tools

Reviewed June 28, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Hui Bai, Jan G Voelkel, Shane Muldowney, Johannes C Eichstaedt, and Robb Willer. 2025. LLM-generated messages can persuade humans on policy issues. Nature Communications16, 1 (2025), 6037

2025

[2] [2]

Atmika M Banerjee and Keka Mukhopadhyaya. 2025. Fine-Tuning Large Lan- guage Models for Personality Development. In2025 9th International Conference on Electronics, Communication and Aerospace Technology (ICECA). IEEE, 2109– 2116

2025

[3] [3]

Vincent D Blondel, Jean-Loup Guillaume, Renaud Lambiotte, and Etienne Lefeb- vre. 2008. Fast unfolding of communities in large networks.Journal of statistical mechanics: theory and experiment2008, 10 (2008), P10008

2008

[4] [4]

Azza Bouleimen, Giordano De Marzo, Taehee Kim, Nicolo Pagan, Hannah Metzler, Silvia Giordano, and David Garcia. 2025. The Collective Turing Test: Large Language Models Can Generate Realistic Multi-User Discussions.arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.08592(2025)

work page arXiv 2025

[5] [5]

Aurélien Bück-Kaeffer, Je Qin Chooi, Dan Zhao, Maximilian Puelma Touzel, Kellin Pelrine, Jean-François Godbout, Reihaneh Rabbany, and Zachary Yang

[6] [6]

BluePrint: A Social Media User Dataset for LLM Persona Evaluation and Training.arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.02343(2025)

work page arXiv 2025

[7] [7]

Tim Dettmers, Artidoro Pagnoni, Ari Holtzman, and Luke Zettlemoyer. 2023. Qlora: Efficient finetuning of quantized llms.Advances in neural information processing systems36 (2023), 10088–10115

2023

[8] [8]

Wen Dong and Fairul Mohd-Zaid. 2025. Simulating and Evaluating Generative Modeling and Collaborative Filtering in Complex Social Networks. InProceedings of the 24th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. 639–648

2025