pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.06432 · v1 · pith:7243DQPEnew · submitted 2026-06-04 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall · cond-mat.mtrl-sci· cond-mat.str-el· quant-ph

Quantum Thermal Logic Gates

Shuvadip Ghosh , Arnab Ghosh , Bivas Dutta , Papiya Maity This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 23:55 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.str-elquant-ph
keywords quantum thermal logic gatescoupled quantum dotsheat currentlogic operationsthermal reservoirsnano-electronic circuitsBoolean logic
0
0 comments X

The pith

Coupled quantum dots produce heat currents that implement Boolean logic gates with a one-to-one match to classical electronic circuits.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes quantum thermal logic gates that operate by directing heat currents through systems of coupled quantum dots connected to metallic thermal reservoirs. These gates achieve the same input-output mappings as standard electronic gates such as AND, OR, and NOT. A sympathetic reader would care because this approach could allow logic operations in quantum circuits to rely on thermal transport rather than charge or spin alone. The authors also outline an experimental nano-electronic setup to realize such gates.

Core claim

In a coupled quantum-dot system tunnel-coupled to metallic thermal reservoirs, the heat current can be engineered so that its steady-state values directly encode the truth tables of classical logic gates, producing a one-to-one structural correspondence with conventional electronic logic circuits.

What carries the argument

Heat current through the coupled quantum-dot system tunnel-coupled to metallic thermal reservoirs, used to generate distinct high and low output levels that map to Boolean 0 and 1.

If this is right

  • Classical logic circuit designs can be directly translated into quantum thermal versions.
  • Multiple gates can be cascaded using heat currents as the interconnect signal.
  • Logic operations become possible in nano-electronic devices that use only thermal reservoirs and quantum dots.
  • The architecture provides a concrete experimental path for testing thermal logic in existing quantum-dot setups.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Such gates might allow logic circuits to operate with lower dissipation if thermal transport can be made more efficient than charge transport.
  • Hybrid devices could combine thermal logic sections with conventional electronic sections on the same chip.
  • Testing would require checking whether reservoir back-action remains negligible when gates are placed close together.

Load-bearing premise

Heat currents through the quantum dots can be made to produce clean, cascadable Boolean outputs without dominant interference or leakage that would scramble the intended logic mapping.

What would settle it

Measurement showing that quantum interference or phonon leakage causes the heat current to take intermediate values instead of two distinct levels that match the classical truth table for any gate.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.06432 by Arnab Ghosh, Bivas Dutta, Papiya Maity, Shuvadip Ghosh.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: (a) Schematic of the proposed QTLG: the CQD [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: (a) CQD setup for the QTBG, with its equiva [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: (a) QTNG setup and its electrical circuit (Inset). [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Double-input QTLG setup and the correspond [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Schematic of the proposed device, with two QD [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Operation of thermal diode: (Left) In the forward-bias configuration, heat flows from S to D when [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: Diagrammatic represen [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: Thermal Buffer and NOT gate anticlockwise cycle: (a) and (b) correspond to the buffer gate with logic inputs [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: Diagrammatic represen [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10: Diagrammatic represen [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11: Thermal-OR gate heat-flow cycle is equivalent to two thermal-diodes operating in parallel, formed out of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12: Thermal-OR gate anticlockwise cycle: Since no hot lead is attached to QD [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13: Diagrammatic repre [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14: Thermal-AND gate heat-flow cycle can proceed in both directions; [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15: Anti-clockwise cycle of thermal-AND gate: The anti-clockwise cycle operates for all input logic states. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16: Diagrammatic represen [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: FIG. 17: Thermal-NOR gate is implemented by applying a NOT operation to an OR gate, achieved by introducing [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_17.png] view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: FIG. 18: Thermal-NOR gate anticlockwise cycle: Since no hot lead is attached to QD [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_18.png] view at source ↗
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: FIG. 19: Diagrammatic rep [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_19.png] view at source ↗
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: FIG. 20: A thermal-NAND gate is realized by applying a NOT operation to an AND gate. Like the AND gate, the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_20.png] view at source ↗
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: FIG. 21: Thermal-NAND gate anticlockwise cycle: Unlike the AND gate, in this case, the Fermi level of the C lead [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_21.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We propose a new concept for quantum thermal logic gates -- analogous to classical electronic logic gates -- that exploit the heat current in a coupled quantum-dot system tunnel-coupled to metallic thermal reservoirs for logic operations in quantum circuits. We obtained a remarkable one-to-one correspondence with the structure of classical electronic logic gate circuits. An experimental setup is presented that demonstrates a realizable nano-electronic quantum circuit architecture for implementing such quantum thermal logic operations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a new concept for quantum thermal logic gates that exploit heat currents in a coupled quantum-dot system tunnel-coupled to metallic thermal reservoirs, claiming a one-to-one correspondence with the structure of classical electronic logic gate circuits and presenting a realizable nano-electronic experimental setup for implementation in quantum circuits.

Significance. If the one-to-one mapping is rigorously derived from transport equations and the setup is shown to produce clean, cascadable Boolean heat-current outputs, the work could open a pathway for thermal logic operations in mesoscopic systems. The use of standard quantum-dot + reservoir geometries is a potential strength if the correspondence is not defined by construction.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the claim of a 'remarkable one-to-one correspondence' with classical logic gate circuits is asserted without any equations, derivations, master-equation solutions, or rate-equation analysis; the central claim therefore rests on an unshown mapping between steady-state heat currents and Boolean outputs.
  2. No analysis is supplied demonstrating that coherent interference between dot levels, phonon-assisted leakage, or finite-temperature reservoir back-action remain negligible across the regime needed for cascaded gate operation; this is load-bearing for the realizability and cascadability assertions.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract would benefit from a concise statement of the operating temperature range or tunnel-coupling strengths required for the proposed logic levels.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed comments. We address each major point below, clarifying the content of the manuscript and indicating where revisions will strengthen the presentation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the claim of a 'remarkable one-to-one correspondence' with classical logic gate circuits is asserted without any equations, derivations, master-equation solutions, or rate-equation analysis; the central claim therefore rests on an unshown mapping between steady-state heat currents and Boolean outputs.

    Authors: The abstract is a concise summary. The one-to-one structural correspondence is obtained in the main text by solving the rate equations for the steady-state heat currents through the coupled quantum-dot system for each input combination; these currents directly reproduce the Boolean truth tables of the corresponding classical gates. The mapping follows from the topology of the dot-reservoir network rather than being imposed by hand. We will revise the abstract to explicitly reference the sections containing the rate-equation analysis and resulting current expressions. revision: yes

  2. Referee: No analysis is supplied demonstrating that coherent interference between dot levels, phonon-assisted leakage, or finite-temperature reservoir back-action remain negligible across the regime needed for cascaded gate operation; this is load-bearing for the realizability and cascadability assertions.

    Authors: The proposal is formulated in the sequential-tunneling regime (weak dot-reservoir coupling relative to level spacing), where coherent interference is suppressed by the Markovian reservoir coupling. Phonon-assisted processes are omitted because the model contains no explicit electron-phonon interaction. For cascadability the output heat current is routed through an intermediate metallic reservoir that thermalizes before serving as input to the next gate. We will add a dedicated paragraph in the revised manuscript that quantifies the relevant parameter window (tunnel rates, temperatures, and level detunings) under which these approximations hold and discuss the conditions required for reliable cascading. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: proposal presents model without reducing claimed correspondence to input definitions

full rationale

The provided abstract and context describe a proposal for quantum thermal logic gates based on heat currents in coupled quantum dots, claiming a one-to-one structural correspondence with classical gates. No equations, parameter fits, or derivation steps are exhibited that would allow verification of self-definitional mapping, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations. The central claim is presented as obtained from the physical setup rather than by construction, and the skeptic concerns address feasibility rather than definitional circularity. Without explicit reduction of any output to its own inputs via the paper's equations, the derivation chain cannot be shown to collapse.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities can be extracted. The proposal implicitly assumes standard quantum-dot tunneling and thermal-reservoir models from prior literature.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5602 in / 1001 out tokens · 22465 ms · 2026-06-27T23:55:22.953919+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

77 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Maurand and X

    R. Maurand and X. Jehl, Transistor qubits heat up, Na- ture Electronics5, 131 (2022)

    2022

  2. [2]

    M. A. Aamir, P. Jamet Suria, J. A. Mar´ ın Guzm´ an, C. Castillo-Moreno, J. M. Epstein, N. Yunger Halpern, and S. Gasparinetti, Thermally driven quantum refriger- ator autonomously resets a superconducting qubit, Na- ture Physics21, 318 (2025)

    2025

  3. [3]

    M. S. Blok and G. T. Landi, Quantum thermodynamics for quantum computing, Nature Physics21, 187 (2025)

    2025

  4. [4]

    Karimi, G

    B. Karimi, G. O. Steffensen, A. P. Higginbotham, C. M. Marcus, A. Levy Yeyati, and J. P. Pekola, Bolometric detection of josephson radiation, Nature Nanotechnology 19, 1613 (2024)

    2024

  5. [5]

    Simbierowicz, M

    S. Simbierowicz, M. Borrelli, V. Monarkha, V. Nuuti- nen, and R. E. Lake, Inherent thermal-noise problem in addressing qubits, PRX Quantum5, 030302 (2024)

    2024

  6. [6]

    Champain, G

    V. Champain, G. Boschetto, H. Niebojewski, B. Bertrand, L. Mauro, M. Bassi, V. Schmitt, X. Jehl, S. Zihlmann, R. Maurand, Y. M. Niquet, C. B. Winkel- mann, S. D. Franceschi, B. Martinez, and B. Brun, A heat-resilient hole spin qubit in silicon (2025), arXiv:2509.15823

    arXiv 2025

  7. [7]

    Roßnagel, S

    J. Roßnagel, S. T. Dawkins, K. N. Tolazzi, O. Abah, E. Lutz, F. Schmidt-Kaler, and K. Singer, A single-atom heat engine, Science352, 325 (2016)

    2016

  8. [8]

    Thierschmann, R

    H. Thierschmann, R. S´ anchez, B. Sothmann, F. Arnold, C. Heyn, W. Hansen, H. Buhmann, and L. W. Molenkamp, Three-terminal energy harvester with cou- pled quantum dots, Nature Nanotechnology10, 854 (2015)

    2015

  9. [9]

    Jezouin, F

    S. Jezouin, F. D. Parmentier, A. Anthore, U. Gennser, A. Cavanna, Y. Jin, and F. Pierre, Quantum limit of heat flow across a single electronic channel, Science342, 601 (2013)

    2013

  10. [10]

    Banerjee, M

    M. Banerjee, M. Heiblum, A. Rosenblatt, Y. Oreg, D. E. Feldman, A. Stern, and V. Umansky, Observed quanti- zation of anyonic heat flow, Nature545, 75 (2017)

    2017

  11. [11]

    Dutta, V

    B. Dutta, V. Umansky, M. Banerjee, and M. Heiblum, Isolated ballistic non-abelian interface channel, Science 377, 1198 (2022)

    2022

  12. [12]

    N. M. Myers, O. Abah, and S. Deffner, Quantum thermo- dynamic devices: From theoretical proposals to experi- mental reality, AVS Quantum Science4, 027101 (2022), and the references therein

    2022

  13. [13]

    Joulain, J

    K. Joulain, J. Drevillon, Y. Ezzahri, and J. Ordonez- Miranda, Quantum thermal transistor, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 200601 (2016)

    2016

  14. [14]

    Dutta, D

    B. Dutta, D. Majidi, A. Garc´ ıa Corral, P. A. Erdman, S. Florens, T. A. Costi, H. Courtois, and C. B. Winkel- mann, Direct probe of the seebeck coefficient in a kondo- correlated single-quantum-dot transistor, Nano Letters 19, 506 (2019). 6

    2019

  15. [15]

    M. L. Perrin, E. Burzur´ ı, and H. S. J. van der Zant, Single-molecule transistors, Chem. Soc. Rev.44, 902 (2015)

    2015

  16. [16]

    N. Gupt, S. Bhattacharyya, B. Das, S. Datta, V. Mukher- jee, and A. Ghosh, Floquet quantum thermal transistor, Phys. Rev. E106, 024110 (2022)

    2022

  17. [17]

    R. T. Wijesekara, S. D. Gunapala, and M. Premaratne, Darlington pair of quantum thermal transistors, Phys. Rev. B104, 045405 (2021)

    2021

  18. [18]

    M. L. Perrin, E. Gal´ an, R. Eelkema, J. M. Thijssen, F. Grozema, and H. S. J. van der Zant, A gate-tunable single-molecule diode, Nanoscale8, 8919 (2016)

    2016

  19. [19]

    Ghosh, N

    S. Ghosh, N. Gupt, and A. Ghosh, Universal behavior of the coulomb-coupled fermionic thermal diode, Entropy 24(2022)

    2022

  20. [20]

    W. Khan, P. P. Potts, S. Lehmann, C. Thelander, K. A. Dick, P. Samuelsson, and V. F. Maisi, Efficient and continuous microwave photoconversion in hybrid cavity- semiconductor nanowire double quantum dot diodes, Na- ture Communications12, 5130 (2021)

    2021

  21. [21]

    Upadhyay, D

    R. Upadhyay, D. S. Golubev, Y.-C. Chang, G. Thomas, A. Guthrie, J. T. Peltonen, and J. P. Pekola, Mi- crowave quantum diode, Nature Communications15, Ar- ticle number: 44908 (2024)

    2024

  22. [22]

    Moskalets, P

    M. Moskalets, P. Samuelsson, and M. B¨ uttiker, Quan- tized dynamics of a coherent capacitor, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 086601 (2008)

    2008

  23. [23]

    Campaioli, S

    F. Campaioli, S. Gherardini, J. Q. Quach, M. Polini, and G. M. Andolina, Colloquium: Quantum batteries, Rev. Mod. Phys.96, 031001 (2024)

    2024

  24. [24]

    Ferraro, F

    D. Ferraro, F. Cavaliere, M. G. Genoni, G. Benenti, and M. Sassetti, Opportunities and challenges of quantum batteries, Nature Reviews Physics8, 115 (2026)

    2026

  25. [25]

    Kosloff and A

    R. Kosloff and A. Levy, Quantum heat engines and re- frigerators: Continuous devices, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 65, 365 (2014)

    2014

  26. [26]

    Ghosh, C

    A. Ghosh, C. L. Latune, L. Davidovich, and G. Kur- izki, Catalysis of heat-to-work conversion in quantum machines, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sci- ences114, 12156 (2017)

    2017

  27. [27]

    Ghosh, D

    A. Ghosh, D. Gelbwaser-Klimovsky, W. Niedenzu, A. I. Lvovsky, I. Mazets, M. O. Scully, and G. Kurizki, Two- level masers as heat-to-work converters, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences115, 9941 (2018)

    2018

  28. [28]

    Binder, L

    F. Binder, L. A. Correa, C. Gogolin, J. Anders, and G. Adesso, Thermodynamics in the quantum regime: Fundamental aspects and new directions (Springer, 2019) and the references therein

    2019

  29. [29]

    Maity, P

    A. Maity, P. Chaki, A. Ghoshal, and U. Sen, Quantum heat transformers, New Journal of Physics28, 014501 (2025)

    2025

  30. [30]

    Kurizki and A

    G. Kurizki and A. Kofman,Thermodynamics and Control of Open Quantum Systems(Cambridge University Press, 2022)

    2022

  31. [31]

    Giazotto, T

    F. Giazotto, T. T. Heikkil¨ a, A. Luukanen, A. M. Savin, and J. P. Pekola, Opportunities for mesoscopics in ther- mometry and refrigeration: Physics and applications, Rev. Mod. Phys.78, 217 (2006)

    2006

  32. [32]

    J. P. Pekola, K. P. Hirvi, J. P. Kauppinen, and M. A. Paalanen, Thermometry by arrays of tunnel junctions, Phys. Rev. Lett.73, 2903 (1994)

    1994

  33. [33]

    Nahum and J

    M. Nahum and J. M. Martinis, Ultrasensitive-hot- electron microbolometer, Applied Physics Letters63, 3075 (1993)

    1993

  34. [34]

    Meschke, J

    M. Meschke, J. T. Peltonen, H. Courtois, and J. P. Pekola, Calorimetric readout of a superconducting proximity-effect thermometer, Journal of Low Temper- ature Physics154, 190 (2009)

    2009

  35. [35]

    Halbertal, J

    D. Halbertal, J. Cuppens, M. Ben Shalom, L. Embon, N. Shadmi, Y. Anahory, H. R. Naren, J. Sarkar, A. Uri, Y. Ronen, Y. Myasoedov, L. S. Levitov, E. Joselevich, A. K. Geim, and E. Zeldov, Nanoscale thermal imaging of dissipation in quantum systems, Nature539, 407 (2016)

    2016

  36. [36]

    Karimi, F

    B. Karimi, F. Brange, P. Samuelsson, and J. P. Pekola, Reaching the ultimate energy resolution of a quantum detector, Nature Communications11, 367 (2020)

    2020

  37. [37]

    J. P. Pekola and B. Karimi, Colloquium: Quantum heat transport in condensed matter systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 041001 (2021)

    2021

  38. [38]

    Majidi, J

    D. Majidi, J. P. Bergfield, V. Maisi, J. H¨ ofer, H. Cour- tois, and C. B. Winkelmann, Heat transport at the nanoscale and ultralow temperatures—implications for quantum technologies, Applied Physics Letters124, 140504 (2024)

    2024

  39. [39]

    Dutta, J

    B. Dutta, J. T. Peltonen, D. S. Antonenko, M. Meschke, M. A. Skvortsov, B. Kubala, J. K¨ onig, C. B. Winkel- mann, H. Courtois, and J. P. Pekola, Thermal conduc- tance of a single-electron transistor, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 077701 (2017)

    2017

  40. [40]

    L. Cui, W. Jeong, S. Hur, M. Matt, J. C. Kl¨ ockner, F. Pauly, P. Nielaba, J. C. Cuevas, E. Meyhofer, and P. Reddy, Quantized thermal transport in single-atom junctions, Science355, 1192 (2017)

    2017

  41. [41]

    Mosso, U

    N. Mosso, U. Drechsler, F. Menges, P. Nirmalraj, S. Karg, H. Riel, and B. Gotsmann, Heat transport through atomic contacts, Nature Nanotechnology12, 430 (2017)

    2017

  42. [42]

    Josefsson, A

    M. Josefsson, A. Svilans, A. M. Burke, E. A. Hoff- mann, S. Fahlvik Svensson, C. Thelander, M. Leijnse, and H. Linke, A quantum-dot heat engine operating close to the thermodynamic efficiency limits, Nature Nan- otechnology13, 920 (2018)

    2018

  43. [43]

    Volosheniuk, R

    S. Volosheniuk, R. Conte, E. Pyurbeeva, T. Baum, M. Vilas-Varela, S. Fern´ andez, D. Pe˜ na, H. S. J. van der Zant, and P. Gehring, A single-molecule quantum heat engine, Nano Letters26, 984 (2026)

    2026

  44. [44]

    Dutta, D

    B. Dutta, D. Majidi, N. W. Talarico, N. Lo Gullo, H. Courtois, and C. B. Winkelmann, Single-quantum-dot heat valve, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 237701 (2020)

    2020

  45. [45]

    Maillet, D

    O. Maillet, D. Subero, J. T. Peltonen, D. S. Golubev, and J. P. Pekola, Electric field control of radiative heat trans- fer in a superconducting circuit, Nature Communications 11, 4326 (2020)

    2020

  46. [46]

    Ronzani, B

    A. Ronzani, B. Karimi, J. Senior, Y.-C. Chang, J. T. Peltonen, C. Chen, and J. P. Pekola, Tunable photonic heat transport in a quantum heat valve, Nature Physics 14, 991 (2018)

    2018

  47. [47]

    Campbell et

    S. Campbell et. al., Roadmap on quantum thermodynam- ics, Quantum Science and Technology11, 012501 (2026), and the references therein

    2026

  48. [48]

    Tiwari, S

    D. Tiwari, S. Bhattacharya, and S. Banerjee, Quan- tum thermal analogs of electric circuits: A universal ap- proach, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 020404 (2025)

    2025

  49. [49]

    L. Wang, Z. Wang, C. Wang, and J. Ren, Cycle flux ranking of network analysis in quantum thermal devices, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 067701 (2022)

    2022

  50. [50]

    Tesser, B

    L. Tesser, B. Bhandari, P. A. Erdman, E. Paladino, R. Fazio, and F. Taddei, Heat rectification through single 7 and coupled quantum dots, New Journal of Physics24, 035001 (2022)

    2022

  51. [51]

    N. Gupt, S. Ghosh, and A. Ghosh, Graph theoretic analysis of three-terminal quantum dot thermocouples: Onsager relations and spin-thermoelectric effects, Phys. Rev. B109, 125124 (2024)

    2024

  52. [52]

    Ghosh, N

    S. Ghosh, N. Gupt, and A. Ghosh, Inverse current in coupled transport: A quantum thermodynamic model, Phys. Rev. Res.8, 023166 (2026)

    2026

  53. [53]

    Wang and B

    L. Wang and B. Li, Thermal logic gates: Computation with phonons, Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 177208 (2007)

    2007

  54. [54]

    Paolucci, G

    F. Paolucci, G. Marchegiani, E. Strambini, and F. Gi- azotto, Phase-tunable thermal logic: Computation with heat, Phys. Rev. Appl.10, 024003 (2018)

    2018

  55. [55]

    Ruokola and T

    T. Ruokola and T. Ojanen, Single-electron heat diode: Asymmetric heat transport between electronic reser- voirs through coulomb islands, Phys. Rev. B83, 241404 (2011)

    2011

  56. [56]

    J. V. Koski, A. Kutvonen, I. M. Khaymovich, T. Ala- Nissila, and J. P. Pekola, On-chip maxwell’s demon as an information-powered refrigerator, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 260602 (2015)

    2015

  57. [57]

    Thierschmann, F

    H. Thierschmann, F. Arnold, M. Mitterm¨ uller, L. Maier, C. Heyn, W. Hansen, H. Buhmann, and L. W. Molenkamp, Thermal gating of charge currents with coulomb coupled quantum dots, New Journal of Physics 17, 113003 (2015)

    2015

  58. [58]

    Zhang, X

    Y. Zhang, X. Zhang, Z. Ye, G. Lin, and J. Chen, Three- terminal quantum-dot thermal management devices, Ap- plied Physics Letters110, 153501 (2017)

    2017

  59. [59]

    R. S. Whitney, R. S´ anchez, and J. Splettstoesser, Quan- tum thermodynamics of nanoscale thermoelectrics and electronic devices, inThermodynamics in the Quan- tum Regime: Fundamental Aspects and New Directions, edited by F. Binder, L. A. Correa, C. Gogolin, J. An- ders, and G. Adesso (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2018) pp. 175–206

    2018

  60. [60]

    S´ anchez and M

    R. S´ anchez and M. B¨ uttiker, Optimal energy quanta to current conversion, Phys. Rev. B83, 085428 (2011)

    2011

  61. [61]

    Pyurbeeva and R

    E. Pyurbeeva and R. Kosloff, Quantum dot ther- mal machines—a guide to engineering, Entropy28, 10.3390/e28010002 (2026)

    work page doi:10.3390/e28010002 2026

  62. [62]

    Ghosh, S

    A. Ghosh, S. S. Sinha, and D. S. Ray, Fermionic oscillator in a fermionic bath, Phys. Rev. E86, 011138 (2012)

    2012

  63. [63]

    N. Gupt, S. Bhattacharyya, and A. Ghosh, Statistical generalization of regenerative bosonic and fermionic stir- ling cycles, Phys. Rev. E104, 054130 (2021)

    2021

  64. [64]

    G. G. Damas, R. J. de Assis, and N. G. de Almeida, Cooling with fermionic thermal reservoirs, Phys. Rev. E 107, 034128 (2023)

    2023

  65. [65]

    Breuer and F

    H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione,The Theory of Open Quantum Systems(Oxford University Press, 2007)

    2007

  66. [66]

    Strasberg,Quantum Stochastic Thermodynamics: Foundations and Selected Applications(Oxford Univer- sity Press, 2022)

    P. Strasberg,Quantum Stochastic Thermodynamics: Foundations and Selected Applications(Oxford Univer- sity Press, 2022)

    2022

  67. [67]

    Millman and C

    J. Millman and C. Halkias,Integrated Electronics: Analog and Digital Circuits and Systems, Electrical Engineering Series (McGraw-Hill, 1972)

    1972

  68. [68]

    Dubos, H

    P. Dubos, H. Courtois, B. Pannetier, F. K. Wilhelm, A. D. Zaikin, and G. Sch¨ on, Josephson critical current in a long mesoscopic s-n-s junction, Phys. Rev. B63, 064502 (2001)

    2001

  69. [69]

    Esposito, K

    M. Esposito, K. Lindenberg, and C. V. den Broeck, Entropy production as correlation between system and reservoir, New Journal of Physics12, 013013 (2010)

    2010

  70. [70]

    G. T. Landi and M. Paternostro, Irreversible entropy pro- duction: From classical to quantum, Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 035008 (2021). Appendix A: Lindblad Master Equation and its Steady-state solution To derive the quantum master equation for our quantum thermal logic gates (QTLG) model, we start with the von-Neumann equation in the interaction picture for the ...

    2021

  71. [71]

    1(b) of the main text

    Detailed Operation of thermal diode Let us now describe the detailed operation of the thermal diode shown in Fig. 1(b) of the main text. Here, two QDs, QD a and QD b, are tunnel-coupled to the Source (S) and Drain (D) leads, respectively. Under forward-bias conditions, heat flows from the hot S lead to the cold D lead, whereas under reverse-bias condition...

  72. [72]

    Thermal diode as Buffer Gate For the above diode model, the steady-state transition rates for the clockwise and anti-clockwise transition cycles are illustrated via a diagrammatic picture in Fig. 7. According to Eq. (A8), the transition rates satisfy the following relations 10 Forward Bias ۧ|𝔸 =ۧ|𝟎𝟎ۧ|ℂ =ۧ|𝟎𝟏 ۧ|𝔹 =ۧ|𝟏𝟎 Γ𝔸ℂ D Γℂ𝔻 S Γ𝔻𝔹 D Γ𝔹𝔸 S ۧ|𝔻 =ۧ|𝟏𝟏 U ۧ...

  73. [73]

    Thermal-NOT Gate By coupling an additional Invert lead (I) to QD a, characterized by temperatureT I and chemical potentialµI, we control the output thermal currentJ I Q at the I lead. This upgrades the thermal-diode model to a thermal-NOT gate: QDa is coupled to the source (S) and invert (I) leads, while QD b is coupled to the drain lead D; therefore, app...

  74. [74]

    10: Diagrammatic represen- tation for the clockwise transition cycle for the OR gate

    Thermal-OR Gate 𝔸 = 𝟎𝟎 ℂ = 𝟎𝟏 𝔹 = 𝟏𝟎 𝔻 = 𝟏𝟏 𝚪↻ 𝐎𝐑 𝚪𝔸ℂ 𝐃 𝚪ℂ𝔻 𝐒𝟐 𝚪𝔻𝔹 𝐃 𝚪𝔹𝔸 𝐒𝟏 𝚪𝔹𝔸 𝐒𝟐 𝚪ℂ𝔻 𝐒𝟏 FIG. 10: Diagrammatic represen- tation for the clockwise transition cycle for the OR gate. The thermal-OR gate is a two-input gate, so we couple two source leads S1 and S2 to QD a. QD b is tunnel-coupled to a single lead D. The input logic is defined by the temperatu...

  75. [75]

    In this configuration, QDa is tunnel-coupled to the source leads S1 and S2

    Thermal-AND Gate The thermal AND gate can be constructed from the OR-gate by introducing an additional control (C) lead attached to QDb. In this configuration, QDa is tunnel-coupled to the source leads S1 and S2. In contrast, QDb is tunnel-coupled to one drain lead D and a control lead C. Under these conditions, the steady-state transition rates [Fig. 13]...

  76. [76]

    16: Diagrammatic represen- tation of the clockwise transition cycle for the NOR gate

    Thermal-NOR Gate 𝔸 = 𝟎𝟎 ℂ = 𝟎𝟏 𝔹 = 𝟏𝟎 𝔻 = 𝟏𝟏 𝚪↻ 𝐍𝐎𝐑 𝚪𝔸ℂ 𝐃 𝚪ℂ𝔻 𝐒𝟐 𝚪𝔻𝔹 𝐃 𝚪𝔹𝔸 𝐒𝟏 𝚪𝔹𝔸 𝐒𝟐 𝚪ℂ𝔻 𝐒𝟏 𝚪ℂ𝔻 𝐈 𝚪𝔹𝔸 𝐈 FIG. 16: Diagrammatic represen- tation of the clockwise transition cycle for the NOR gate. To construct the thermal-NOR gate, the thermal-NOT gate setup is combined with the thermal-OR gate circuit. Hence, QD a is coupled to an additional inverting lead...

  77. [77]

    Thermal-NAND Gate Following a similar idea, a thermal-NAND gate can be constructed by combining a thermal-NOT gate with the thermal-AND gate circuit. In this configuration, QD a is coupled to an additional inverting lead I, along with the two input reservoirs S1 and S2, whereas QD b is coupled to D and C-lead, as in the thermal-AND gate. Dۧ|ℂ =ۧ|𝟎𝟏 Γℂ𝔸 D ...