pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.06595 · v1 · pith:BZEDSRJ5new · submitted 2026-06-04 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE · astro-ph.GA

VLA Observations Confirm AT 2023mfm as an Off-nuclear Tidal Disruption Event

Wenkai Li , Collin T. Christy , Kate D. Alexander , Itai Sfaradi , Xinya Huang , Ning Jiang , Tanmoy Laskar , Andrew Mummery
show 10 more authors
Noah Franz Adelle J. Goodwin Walter W. Golay Raffaella Margutti Ryan Chornock Jiazheng Zhu Sjoert van Velzen Yvette Cendes Wenbin Lu Jimmy Lynch
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 00:03 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE astro-ph.GA
keywords tidal disruption eventsoff-nuclear transientsradio imagingvery large arrayblack hole locations
0
0 comments X

The pith

High-resolution radio imaging confirms the tidal disruption event AT 2023mfm lies 1.06 kpc from its host galaxy nucleus.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents new Very Large Array observations at 6 GHz that resolve two distinct radio sources in the field of AT 2023mfm. One source aligns with the galaxy center while the second is offset by 0.651 arcsec, matching the optical position of the transient. This positional agreement establishes that the event occurred away from the nucleus rather than at the central black hole. The result shows how radio imaging can isolate off-nuclear transients that optical searches alone might leave ambiguous.

Core claim

VLA C-band imaging resolves an offset radio source at 0.651±0.036 arcsec (1.06±0.06 kpc) from the host nucleus whose position coincides with the Zwicky Transient Facility and Pan-STARRS1 coordinates of AT 2023mfm, thereby confirming the transient as an off-nuclear tidal disruption event.

What carries the argument

High-resolution 6 GHz radio imaging that spatially separates the offset transient source from the galactic nucleus.

If this is right

  • Off-nuclear TDE candidates identified in optical surveys can be validated as genuine events through radio follow-up.
  • High-resolution radio imaging provides a practical route to locate massive black holes displaced from galaxy centers.
  • The method can be applied to other transients to test whether they arise from off-nuclear black holes.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar radio offsets in future candidates would increase the known population of wandering black holes in nearby galaxies.
  • If the offset persists across wavelengths, it would support models in which black holes are ejected or formed in satellite galaxies that later merge.
  • Routine application of this technique could constrain the fraction of TDEs that occur outside galactic nuclei.

Load-bearing premise

The offset radio source belongs to the tidal disruption event rather than arising from a chance alignment or unrelated feature in the host galaxy.

What would settle it

A higher-resolution observation or multi-epoch monitoring showing the offset radio source remains steady while the optical transient fades, or a measured position mismatch exceeding the reported 0.036 arcsec uncertainty.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.06595 by Adelle J. Goodwin, Andrew Mummery, Collin T. Christy, Itai Sfaradi, Jiazheng Zhu, Jimmy Lynch, Kate D. Alexander, Ning Jiang, Noah Franz, Raffaella Margutti, Ryan Chornock, Sjoert van Velzen, Tanmoy Laskar, Walter W. Golay, Wenbin Lu, Wenkai Li, Xinya Huang, Yvette Cendes.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: VLA A-configuration C-band (6 GHz) image of AT 2023mfm on 2026 April 11, revealing distinct radio emission at the TDE location (SE) and host-galaxy nucleus (NW). The white cross marks the PS1/TNS TDE position; white ellipses show the 1σ–3σ ZTF contours; the diamond/triangle/square mark the SDSS/PS1/LS host-galaxy centroids, respectively; the star/pentagon mark the VLA detections. The gray ellipse shows the… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We report new radio observations of the tidal disruption event (TDE) AT 2023mfm, which we identified as a high-confidence candidate in a systematic search for off-nuclear TDEs. High-resolution NSF Karl G. Jansky Very Large Array C-band (6 GHz) imaging resolves two radio sources: one consistent with the host-galaxy nucleus and one offset by $0.651\pm0.036^{\prime\prime}$ ($1.06\pm0.06$ kpc), consistent with the Zwicky Transient Facility and Pan-STARRS1 positions of AT 2023mfm. These observations confirm the off-nuclear nature of AT 2023mfm, demonstrating the power of high-resolution radio imaging to validate off-nuclear TDE candidates and reveal hidden off-nuclear massive black holes.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports new VLA C-band (6 GHz) imaging of the candidate off-nuclear TDE AT 2023mfm. The observations resolve two radio sources within the host galaxy: one at the nucleus and one offset by 0.651 ± 0.036 arcsec (1.06 ± 0.06 kpc), with the offset position matching the optical coordinates from ZTF and Pan-STARRS1. The authors conclude that these data confirm the off-nuclear nature of the TDE.

Significance. If the physical association between the offset radio source and the optical transient is robust, the result adds a confirmed example to the small sample of off-nuclear TDEs and illustrates the value of high-resolution radio follow-up for validating such candidates and identifying candidate wandering or intermediate-mass black holes.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract / Results] Abstract and Results section: the claim that the VLA data 'confirm the off-nuclear nature' of AT 2023mfm rests on positional coincidence (0.651 ± 0.036 arcsec) alone. No surface-density estimate, Poisson probability of chance alignment, multi-epoch variability test, or spectral-index information is provided to demonstrate that the offset source is the TDE counterpart rather than a background AGN, star-forming region, or unrelated source. This probability calculation is load-bearing for the central confirmation claim.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The offset is quoted both in arcseconds and kpc; the conversion assumes a specific cosmology and redshift that should be stated explicitly when first introduced.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive feedback. We address the major comment below and will revise the manuscript accordingly to strengthen the statistical support for our conclusions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / Results] Abstract and Results section: the claim that the VLA data 'confirm the off-nuclear nature' of AT 2023mfm rests on positional coincidence (0.651 ± 0.036 arcsec) alone. No surface-density estimate, Poisson probability of chance alignment, multi-epoch variability test, or spectral-index information is provided to demonstrate that the offset source is the TDE counterpart rather than a background AGN, star-forming region, or unrelated source. This probability calculation is load-bearing for the central confirmation claim.

    Authors: We agree that a quantitative estimate of the chance-alignment probability would strengthen the manuscript and make the confirmation claim more robust. In the revised version we will add a surface-density calculation for 6 GHz radio sources (drawing on published VLA counts at comparable flux densities) and compute the Poisson probability of an unrelated source falling within the observed 0.65 arcsec offset. This will be presented in the Results section and referenced in the abstract. Our current data are single-epoch C-band continuum imaging, so multi-epoch variability and spectral-index information are not available; we will note this limitation explicitly. The positional match (within the quoted uncertainty) to the independently measured optical transient position, combined with the clear separation from the nuclear radio source, remains the primary evidence, but we accept that the additional statistic requested is warranted and will incorporate it. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: direct observational positional match with no derivation or fitted inputs

full rationale

The paper reports VLA C-band imaging that resolves an offset radio source whose measured position (0.651±0.036 arcsec) matches prior optical transient coordinates. This is a direct comparison of independent observational datasets; no equations, parameter fits, model predictions, or self-citations are invoked to derive the offset or the association. The central claim does not reduce to any input quantity by construction. No steps match any enumerated circularity pattern.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are stated. The claim rests on the assumption of positional association between radio and optical sources.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5747 in / 1056 out tokens · 25863 ms · 2026-06-28T00:03:41.548728+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Late-time JWST/NIRCam Observations of the Extremely Long-duration GRB 250702B/EP 250702a and Its Host Galaxy

    astro-ph.HE 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Late-time JWST/NIRCam data on GRB 250702B show a high-mass dusty host and possible ~3-sigma transient detections in two bands suggesting light-curve flattening.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

14 extracted references · 12 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    and Verkouter, Marjolein and Wells, Akeem and Xiong, Wei and Szomoru, Arpad and Griffith, Morgan and Glendenning, Brian and Kern, Jeff , title =

    16 https://science.nrao.edu/facilities/vla/docs/manuals/oss/performance/ positional-accuracy CASA Team, Bean, B., Bhatnagar, S., et al. 2022, PASP, 134, 114501, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/ac9642

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1088/1538-3873/ac9642 2022

  2. [2]

    D., Chornock, R., et al.\ 2024, , 971, 185, doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad5541

    Cendes, Y ., Berger, E., Alexander, K. D., et al. 2024, ApJ, 971, 185, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5541 4

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad5541 2024

  3. [3]

    2023, Transient Name Server AstroNote, 250, 1

    Chornock, R., Yao, Y ., LeBaron, N., et al. 2023, Transient Name Server AstroNote, 250, 1

    2023

  4. [4]

    E., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/782/2/90 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...782...90C 782, 90

    Cluver, M. E., Jarrett, T. H., Hopkins, A. M., et al. 2014, ApJ, 782, 90, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/782/2/90 Förster, F., Cabrera-Vives, G., Castillo-Navarrete, E., et al. 2021, AJ, 161, 242, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/abe9bc

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/782/2/90 2014

  5. [5]

    2023, Transient Name Server Discovery Report, 2023-1546, 1

    Fremling, C. 2023, Transient Name Server Discovery Report, 2023-1546, 1

    2023

  6. [6]

    2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2602.12970, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2602.12970

    Guolo, M. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2602.12970, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2602.12970

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.12970 2026

  7. [7]

    C., Li, D

    Jin, C. C., Li, D. Y ., Jiang, N., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2501.09580, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2501.09580

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2501.09580 2025

  8. [8]

    Nature Astronomy , author =

    Lin, D., Strader, J., Carrasco, E. R., et al. 2018, Nature Astronomy, 2, 656, doi: 10.1038/s41550-018-0493-1

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-018-0493-1 2018

  9. [9]

    2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.14483, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2601.14483

    Mummery, A. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.14483, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2601.14483

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.14483 2026

  10. [10]

    , keywords =

    Mummery, A., van Velzen, S., Nathan, E., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 527, 2452, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad3001

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3001 2024

  11. [11]

    2025, ApJL, 992, L18, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ae0a26

    Sfaradi, I., Margutti, R., Chornock, R., et al. 2025, ApJL, 992, L18, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ae0a26

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae0a26 2025

  12. [12]

    TDE 2025abcr: A Tidal Disruption Event in the Outskirts of a Massive Galaxy

    Stein, R., Carney, J., Ward, C., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2602.10180, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2602.10180

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.10180 2026

  13. [13]

    , keywords =

    Yao, Y ., Chornock, R., Ward, C., et al. 2025, ApJL, 985, L48, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/add7de

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/add7de 2025

  14. [14]

    P., Bridges M., 2009, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14548.x , 398, 1601

    Zibetti, S., Charlot, S., & Rix, H.-W. 2009, MNRAS, 400, 1181, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15528.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15528.x 2009