pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.06620 · v1 · pith:ORA5A5AQnew · submitted 2026-06-04 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA · astro-ph.HE

JWST reveals how black holes are fed: kiloparsec-scale multiphase filaments feed sub-kiloparsec circumnuclear disks

Julie Hlavacek-Larrondo , Hyunseop Choi , Minghao Guo , Mathieu Marquis , Olivia Pereira , G. Mark Voit , Lo\"ic Albert , Jorge Barrera-Ballesteros
show 30 more authors
Rebecca E. A. Canning Francesco D'Eugenio Megan Donahue Andrew C. Fabian Gary J. Ferland John S. Gallagher Marie-Lou Gendron-Marsolais Pierre Guillard Nina Hatch Ralf Kottulla Yuan Li Roberto Maiolino Allison Man Michael A. McDonald Brian R. McNamara Valeria Olivares Marine Prunier Michael Reefe Christopher S. Reynolds Carter Rhea Annabelle Richard-Larri\`ere Helen R. Russell Philippe Salom\'e Ming Sun Prathamesh Tamhane Gregory Taylor Auriane Thilloy Grant R. Tremblay Benjamin Vigneron Stephen A. Walker
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 00:05 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.HE
keywords JWST observationsNGC 4696circumnuclear diskAGN feedbackmultiphase filamentsCentaurus clusterblack hole accretioncooling flows
0
0 comments X

The pith

Multiphase filaments in NGC 4696 transport gas from cluster scales to a rotating circumnuclear disk that feeds the central black hole.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents JWST NIRSpec observations of the inner 618 parsecs of NGC 4696 at 10 parsec resolution, showing that the S-shaped ionized gas swirl is a rotating multiphase circumnuclear disk. This disk is physically and kinematically linked to the larger kiloparsec-scale filamentary network that spans from hot X-ray gas to cold molecular material. Tailored magnetohydrodynamic simulations reproduce the observed structure by having filamentary gas condense from the hot atmosphere, lose angular momentum, and settle into the disk that then mediates accretion. The same pattern appears in NGC 1275, suggesting this pathway operates in other radio-mode AGN systems. If correct, the result supplies the direct connection between large-scale cooling flows and black-hole fueling that had been missing in models of self-regulated galaxy evolution.

Core claim

The ionized swirl is a rotating multiphase circumnuclear disk physically and kinematically connected to the larger-scale filamentary network. This supplies the long-sought missing link between kiloparsec-scale cooling flows and black hole accretion on less than 100 parsec scales. The observed morphology and kinematics are reproduced by magnetohydrodynamic simulations in which filamentary gas condenses from the hot atmosphere, loses angular momentum, and feeds a rotating disk that mediates accretion onto the black hole.

What carries the argument

The rotating multiphase circumnuclear disk that receives gas from kiloparsec filaments and channels it inward to the black hole.

If this is right

  • Gas condenses from the hot X-ray atmosphere into filaments that lose angular momentum and settle into the disk.
  • The disk acts as the intermediary that enables sustained black-hole accretion in radio-mode feedback systems.
  • The same filament-to-disk pathway operates in NGC 1275, indicating it is common to prototypical cluster-core AGN.
  • This mechanism closes the feedback loop and supplies a concrete route for self-regulated galaxy evolution.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same disk-mediated feeding may occur in other cool-core clusters once comparable 10-parsec resolution data become available.
  • Simulations that include explicit angular-momentum transport in condensing filaments can now be tested directly against the observed disk kinematics.
  • The framework predicts that removing the disk (for example by strong jet disruption) would temporarily starve the black hole until new filaments reform.

Load-bearing premise

The S-shaped ionized-gas swirl is a rotating multiphase circumnuclear disk that is physically and kinematically connected to the larger filamentary network.

What would settle it

High-resolution kinematic maps that show the swirl has no coherent rotation or no velocity continuity with the outer filaments would falsify the connection.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.06620 by Allison Man, Andrew C. Fabian, Annabelle Richard-Larri\`ere, Auriane Thilloy, Benjamin Vigneron, Brian R. McNamara, Carter Rhea, Christopher S. Reynolds, Francesco D'Eugenio, Gary J. Ferland, G. Mark Voit, Grant R. Tremblay, Gregory Taylor, Helen R. Russell, Hyunseop Choi, John S. Gallagher, Jorge Barrera-Ballesteros, Julie Hlavacek-Larrondo, Lo\"ic Albert, Marie-Lou Gendron-Marsolais, Marine Prunier, Mathieu Marquis, Megan Donahue, Michael A. McDonald, Michael Reefe, Minghao Guo, Ming Sun, Nina Hatch, Olivia Pereira, Philippe Salom\'e, Pierre Guillard, Prathamesh Tamhane, Ralf Kottulla, Rebecca E. A. Canning, Roberto Maiolino, Stephen A. Walker, Valeria Olivares, Yuan Li.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Top panel: Composite large-scale image of the Centaurus cluster. Chandra 0.5 to 7 keV image in blue. HST/WFC3 F665N (containing redshifted Hα), with the continuum estimated from F814W and subtracted, shown in red. The field of view (FoV) of JWST/NIRspec is shown with the cyan square. Middle and bottom panels: The central 760 pc × 550 pc of NGC 4696. Top-left: HST/WFC3 F665N (containing redshifted Hα), with… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Top panels: a) Snapshot of projected large-scale 3DMHD simulated filament network. b) Snapshot of 3DMHD simulated velocity field within a NIRSpec/IFU field of view, showing only cool gas with a surface density greater than 1% of the maximum. Both snapshots shown in panels a) and b) corresponds to t = 40 Myr of the 3DMHD simulations. Bottom panels: c) Evolution of the outer radius of the kpc-scale filaments… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Position-velocity (PV) diagrams. (a) v50 map with slit positions and extraction directions (green circle marks AGN position from A. C. Fabian et al. 2016). (b) PV diagram along the blue slit (CND), showing velocities rapidly declining to systemic on both sides. (c) PV diagram along the green slit, highlighting the filament’s kinematic connection to the CND. Velocities are relative to systemic (dashed horiz… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Eight snapshots of the 3DMHD simulated velocity field within a JWST/NIRSpec IFU field of view, analogous to panel b) of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The Centaurus cluster is one of the most important archetypes of radio-mode AGN feedback, with its central galaxy, NGC 4696, launching powerful jets that inflate X-ray cavities and regulate cooling and star formation. NGC 4696 lies within a spectacular multiphase nebula of filaments extending over tens of kiloparsecs and spanning six decades in temperature, from hot (10^8 K) X-ray-emitting plasma to cold molecular gas. Owing to its proximity, Hubble Space Telescope H_alpha imaging reveals a striking S-shaped ionized-gas swirl within the black hole's sphere of influence - the first such structure identified in a cluster core. Here we present the first JWST observations of NGC 4696 with NIRSpec, probing the inner 618 pc * 618 pc at 10 pc resolution. These data reveal that the ionized swirl is a rotating, multiphase circumnuclear disk (CND) physically and kinematically connected to the larger-scale filamentary network. This provides the long-sought missing link between kiloparsec-scale cooling flows and black hole accretion on <100 pc scales. Strikingly, the observed morphology and kinematics are reproduced by tailored magnetohydrodynamic simulations, in which filamentary gas condenses from the hot atmosphere, loses angular momentum, and feeds a rotating CND that mediates accretion onto the black hole. A similar structure in NGC 1275, the Perseus cluster's central galaxy, together with our results on NGC 4696 - two prototypical radio-mode AGN feedback systems - points to a common mechanism: multiphase filaments transport gas from cluster scales down to the vicinity of the black hole via a CND, closing the AGN feedback loop and establishing a physically grounded framework for self-regulated galaxy evolution.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports JWST NIRSpec observations of NGC 4696 in the Centaurus cluster, claiming that the S-shaped ionized-gas swirl is a rotating multiphase circumnuclear disk (CND) physically and kinematically connected to larger-scale multiphase filaments. This connection is presented as the missing link between kpc-scale cooling flows and black hole accretion on <100 pc scales. The observed morphology and kinematics are stated to be reproduced by tailored MHD simulations, with a similar structure noted in NGC 1275, suggesting a common mechanism for multiphase filaments feeding the black hole via a CND and closing the AGN feedback loop.

Significance. If the kinematic connection and rotation are robustly confirmed, the result would establish a direct observational pathway for gas transport from cluster scales to the black hole, providing a physically grounded framework for self-regulated AGN feedback in galaxy evolution. The combination of high-resolution JWST data with MHD simulations is a positive aspect, but the absence of a dynamical mass consistency check limits the current strength of the central claim.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The central claim that the S-shaped swirl is a rotating multiphase CND kinematically connected to the filament network depends on the NIRSpec data showing coherent rotation. The abstract provides no details on the velocity gradient, position-velocity structure, or enclosed mass within the inner ~100 pc to match the expected dynamical mass for a ~few × 10^8 M_⊙ black hole (rotation velocities ~100-200 km/s at 50-100 pc). This verification is load-bearing for distinguishing rotation from inflow, outflow, or projection effects.
  2. [Abstract] The abstract states that morphology and kinematics are reproduced by tailored MHD simulations in which filamentary gas condenses, loses angular momentum, and feeds a rotating CND. However, no simulation parameters, initial conditions, resolution, or quantitative comparison metrics are provided, preventing assessment of how strongly the simulations support the feeding scenario.
minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract refers to the structure as 'the first such structure identified in a cluster core' but does not briefly contextualize it against other known nuclear gas structures in AGN hosts.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments and positive assessment of the work's potential significance. We address each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] The central claim that the S-shaped swirl is a rotating multiphase CND kinematically connected to the filament network depends on the NIRSpec data showing coherent rotation. The abstract provides no details on the velocity gradient, position-velocity structure, or enclosed mass within the inner ~100 pc to match the expected dynamical mass for a ~few × 10^8 M_⊙ black hole (rotation velocities ~100-200 km/s at 50-100 pc). This verification is load-bearing for distinguishing rotation from inflow, outflow, or projection effects.

    Authors: The full manuscript (Section 3) presents the NIRSpec velocity field and position-velocity diagrams demonstrating coherent rotation. We will revise the abstract to summarize the observed velocity gradient and position-velocity structure that support the rotating CND. A direct enclosed-mass consistency check against the black hole mass is not performed in the current manuscript. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Abstract] The abstract states that morphology and kinematics are reproduced by tailored MHD simulations in which filamentary gas condenses, loses angular momentum, and feeds a rotating CND. However, no simulation parameters, initial conditions, resolution, or quantitative comparison metrics are provided, preventing assessment of how strongly the simulations support the feeding scenario.

    Authors: Simulation setup, initial conditions, resolution, and comparison metrics are described in the Methods section. We will revise the abstract to include a concise reference to these elements and the quantitative agreement achieved. revision: yes

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Absence of a dynamical mass consistency check comparing observed velocities to the expected values for the central black hole mass.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; observational interpretation stands on new data

full rationale

The paper's central claim rests on JWST NIRSpec observations of the S-shaped ionized-gas structure in NGC 4696, interpreted as a rotating multiphase CND kinematically linked to larger filaments. This interpretation is presented as a direct reading of the new 10-pc-resolution data rather than a quantity derived from prior equations or fitted parameters within the paper. The MHD simulations are described as reproducing the observed morphology and kinematics but are not shown to be the source of the claim itself; the result does not reduce by construction to any self-defined input, fitted subset, or self-citation chain. The work is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks (new telescope data) with no load-bearing step that collapses to its own definitions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based solely on the abstract; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are stated. The work relies on standard astrophysical assumptions about multiphase gas cooling and angular momentum transport that are not detailed here.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 6045 in / 1153 out tokens · 28699 ms · 2026-06-28T00:05:47.126441+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 62 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    P., Tollerud, E

    Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T. P., Tollerud, E. J., et al. 2013, A&A, 558, A33, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Sip˝ ocz, B. M., et al. 2018, AJ, 156, 123, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Lim, P. L., et al. 2022, ApJ, 935, 167, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c74

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 2013

  2. [2]

    Balbus, S. A. 1991, ApJ, 372, 25, doi: 10.1086/169951

    work page doi:10.1086/169951 1991

  3. [3]

    Bentz, M. C. 2025, Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society, 9, 128, doi: 10.3847/2515-5172/adddac JWST Observations of NGC 469613 B¨ oker, T., Arribas, S., L¨ utzgendorf, N., et al. 2022, A&A, 661, A82, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142589

    work page doi:10.3847/2515-5172/adddac 2025

  4. [4]

    2019, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol

    Bushouse, H., Eisenhamer, J., & Davies, J. 2019, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 523, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XXVII, ed. P. J. Teuben, M. W. Pound, B. A. Thomas, & E. M. Warner, 543

    2019

  5. [5]

    Canning, R. E. A., Fabian, A. C., Johnstone, R. M., et al. 2011, MNRAS, 417, 3080, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19470.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19470.x 2011

  6. [6]

    2013, MNRAS, 436, 526, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt1594

    Churazov, E., Ruszkowski, M., & Schekochihin, A. 2013, MNRAS, 436, 526, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt1594

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stt1594 2013

  7. [7]

    J., Gallagher, John S., I., & Wyse, R

    Conselice, C. J., Gallagher, John S., I., & Wyse, R. F. G. 2001, AJ, 122, 2281, doi: 10.1086/323534

    work page doi:10.1086/323534 2001

  8. [8]

    2026, GraphingLib/GraphingLib: GraphingLib 1.6.0 Release,, Zenodo doi: 10.5281/zenodo.19936793

    Coulombe, G., Lapointe, Y., Marquis, M., et al. 2026, GraphingLib/GraphingLib: GraphingLib 1.6.0 Release,, Zenodo doi: 10.5281/zenodo.19936793

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.19936793 2026

  9. [9]

    S., & Fabian, A

    Crawford, C. S., & Fabian, A. C. 1992, MNRAS, 259, 265, doi: 10.1093/mnras/259.2.265

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/259.2.265 1992

  10. [10]

    , keywords =

    Crawford, C. S., Hatch, N. A., Fabian, A. C., & Sanders, J. S. 2005, MNRAS, 363, 216, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09463.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09463.x 2005

  11. [11]

    P., Lim, J., Forman, W., et al

    David, L. P., Lim, J., Forman, W., et al. 2014, ApJ, 792, 94, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/792/2/94

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/792/2/94 2014

  12. [12]

    Fabian, A. C. 2012, ARA&A, 50, 455, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125521

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125521 2012

  13. [13]

    C., Atherton, P

    Fabian, A. C., Atherton, P. D., Taylor, K., & Nulsen, P. E. J. 1982, MNRAS, 201, 17P, doi: 10.1093/mnras/201.1.17P

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/201.1.17p 1982

  14. [14]

    C., Johnstone, R

    Fabian, A. C., Johnstone, R. M., Sanders, J. S., et al. 2008, Nature, 454, 968, doi: 10.1038/nature07169

    work page doi:10.1038/nature07169 2008

  15. [15]

    C., Walker, S

    Fabian, A. C., Walker, S. A., Russell, H. R., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 461, 922, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw1350

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw1350 2016

  16. [16]

    , keywords =

    Ferland, G. J., Fabian, A. C., Hatch, N. A., et al. 2009, MNRAS, 392, 1475, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.14153.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.14153.x 2009

  17. [17]

    2012, ApJ, 758, 103, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/758/2/103

    Gaburov, E., Johansen, A., & Levin, Y. 2012, ApJ, 758, 103, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/758/2/103

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/758/2/103 2012

  18. [18]

    Gaspari, M., Ruszkowski, M., & Oh, S. P. 2013, MNRAS, 432, 3401, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt692

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stt692 2013

  19. [19]

    2017, MNRAS, 466, 677, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw3108

    Gaspari, M., Temi, P., & Brighenti, F. 2017, MNRAS, 466, 677, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw3108

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw3108 2017

  20. [20]

    L., et al

    Gaspari, M., McDonald, M., Hamer, S. L., et al. 2018, ApJ, 854, 167, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaaa1b

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaaa1b 2018

  21. [21]

    2015, Revolution in Astronomy with ALMA: The Third Year, 499, 363

    Ginsburg, A., Robitaille, T., Beaumont, C., et al. 2015, Revolution in Astronomy with ALMA: The Third Year, 499, 363

    2015

  22. [22]

    M., Kim, C.-G., & Quataert, E

    Guo, M., Stone, J. M., Kim, C.-G., & Quataert, E. 2023, ApJ, 946, 26, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acb81e

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acb81e 2023

  23. [23]

    M., Quataert, E., & Kim, C.-G

    Guo, M., Stone, J. M., Quataert, E., & Kim, C.-G. 2024, ApJ, 973, 141, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5fe7

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad5fe7 2024

  24. [24]

    M., Quataert, E., & Springel, V

    Guo, M., Stone, J. M., Quataert, E., & Springel, V. 2025, ApJ, 987, 202, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/add1da

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/add1da 2025

  25. [25]

    L., Fabian, A

    Hamer, S. L., Fabian, A. C., Russell, H. R., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 483, 4984, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty3459

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty3459 2019

  26. [26]

    R., Millman, K

    Harris, C. R., Millman, K. J., Van Der Walt, S. J., et al. 2020, Nature, 585, 357, doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 2020

  27. [27]

    2022, in Handbook of X-ray and Gamma-ray Astrophysics, ed

    Hlavacek-Larrondo, J., Li, Y., & Churazov, E. 2022, in Handbook of X-ray and Gamma-ray Astrophysics, ed. C. Bambi & A. Sangangelo, 5, doi: 10.1007/978-981-16-4544-0 122-1

    work page doi:10.1007/978-981-16-4544-0 2022

  28. [28]

    2025, ApJ, 980, 170, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ada7ed

    Hlavacek-Larrondo, J., Choi, H., Guo, M., et al. 2025, ApJ, 980, 170, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ada7ed

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ada7ed 2025

  29. [29]

    A gas-giant planet transiting a rapidly rotating A5 star

    Hopkins, P. F., & Quataert, E. 2010, MNRAS, 407, 1529, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17064.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17064.x 2010

  30. [30]

    Thirty systems with space-based light curves

    Hopkins, P. F., & Quataert, E. 2011, MNRAS, 415, 1027, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18542.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18542.x 2011

  31. [31]

    Hunter, J. D. 2007, Computing in Science & Engineering, 9, 90, doi: 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55

    work page doi:10.1109/mcse.2007.55 2007

  32. [32]

    P., & McCourt, M

    Ji, S., Oh, S. P., & McCourt, M. 2018, MNRAS, 476, 852, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty293

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty293 2018

  33. [33]

    Li, Y., & Bryan, G. L. 2012, ApJ, 747, 26, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/747/1/26

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/747/1/26 2012

  34. [34]

    Li, Y., & Bryan, G. L. 2014, ApJ, 789, 153, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/789/2/153

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/789/2/153 2014

  35. [35]

    2024, ApJ, 976, 33, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad7de4

    Liu, W., Fan, X., Yang, J., et al. 2024, ApJ, 976, 33, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad7de4

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad7de4 2024

  36. [36]

    1990, ApJ, 349, 471, doi: 10.1086/168331

    Loewenstein, M. 1990, ApJ, 349, 471, doi: 10.1086/168331

    work page doi:10.1086/168331 1990

  37. [37]

    R., & Nulsen, P

    McNamara, B. R., & Nulsen, P. E. J. 2012, New Journal of Physics, 14, 055023, doi: 10.1088/1367-2630/14/5/055023

    work page doi:10.1088/1367-2630/14/5/055023 2012

  38. [38]

    R., Russell, H

    McNamara, B. R., Russell, H. R., Nulsen, P. E. J., et al. 2016, ApJ, 830, 79, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/830/2/79

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/830/2/79 2016

  39. [39]

    R., et al

    Mezcua, M., Hlavacek-Larrondo, J., Lucey, J. R., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 474, 1342, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx2812

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2812 2018

  40. [40]

    1957, in Radio astronomy, ed

    Minkowski, R. 1957, in Radio astronomy, ed. H. C. van de

    1957

  41. [41]

    Thirty systems with space-based light curves

    Mittal, R., O’Dea, C. P., Ferland, G., et al. 2011, MNRAS, 418, 2386, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19634.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19634.x 2011

  42. [42]

    2019, ApJ, 883, 193, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab3e6e

    Nagai, H., Onishi, K., Kawakatu, N., et al. 2019, ApJ, 883, 193, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab3e6e

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab3e6e 2019

  43. [43]

    2019, A&A, 631, A22, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201935350

    Olivares, V., Salome, P., Combes, F., et al. 2019, A&A, 631, A22, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201935350

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935350 2019

  44. [44]

    2024, Nature Astronomy, 8, 256, doi: 10.1038/s41550-023-02138-y

    Oosterloo, T., Morganti, R., & Murthy, S. 2024, Nature Astronomy, 8, 256, doi: 10.1038/s41550-023-02138-y

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-023-02138-y 2024

  45. [45]

    2005, ApJ, 632, 821, doi: 10.1086/444344

    Pizzolato, F., & Soker, N. 2005, ApJ, 632, 821, doi: 10.1086/444344

    work page doi:10.1086/444344 2005

  46. [46]

    A gas-giant planet transiting a rapidly rotating A5 star

    Pizzolato, F., & Soker, N. 2010, MNRAS, 408, 961, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17156.x 14Hlavacek-Larrondo et al

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17156.x 2010

  47. [47]

    A., Nixon, C

    Pounds, K. A., Nixon, C. J., Lobban, A., & King, A. R. 2018, MNRAS, 481, 1832, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty2359

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2359 2018

  48. [48]

    Rauscher, B. J. 2024, PASP, 136, 015001, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/ad1b36

    work page doi:10.1088/1538-3873/ad1b36 2024

  49. [49]

    2008, A&A, 477, L33, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20078915

    Revaz, Y., Combes, F., & Salom´ e, P. 2008, A&A, 477, L33, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20078915

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20078915 2008

  50. [50]

    C., Combes, F., et al

    Rose, T., Edge, A. C., Combes, F., et al. 2019a, MNRAS, 485, 229, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz406

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz406

  51. [51]

    C., Combes, F., et al

    Rose, T., Edge, A. C., Combes, F., et al. 2019b, MNRAS, 489, 349, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz2138

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2138

  52. [52]

    R., McNamara, B

    Russell, H. R., McNamara, B. R., Edge, A. C., et al. 2013, MNRAS, 432, 530, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt490

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stt490 2013

  53. [53]

    R., McNamara, B

    Russell, H. R., McNamara, B. R., Fabian, A. C., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 490, 3025, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz2719

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2719 2019

  54. [54]

    , keywords =

    Sanders, J. S., Fabian, A. C., Allen, S. W., et al. 2008, MNRAS, 385, 1186, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.12952.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.12952.x 2008

  55. [55]

    S., Fabian, A

    Sanders, J. S., Fabian, A. C., Taylor, G. B., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 457, 82, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv2972 Scharw¨ achter, J., McGregor, P. J., Dopita, M. A., & Beck, T. L. 2013, MNRAS, 429, 2315, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sts502

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2972 2016

  56. [56]

    M., Mullen, P

    Stone, J. M., Mullen, P. D., Fielding, D., et al. 2026, ApJS, 283, 27, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ae3717

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ae3717 2026

  57. [57]

    2026, PASA, 43, e036, doi: 10.1017/pasa.2026.10172

    Tamhane, P., Sun, M., Waldron, W., et al. 2026, PASA, 43, e036, doi: 10.1017/pasa.2026.10172

    work page doi:10.1017/pasa.2026.10172 2026

  58. [58]

    , keywords =

    Taylor, G. B., Sanders, J. S., Fabian, A. C., & Allen, S. W. 2006, MNRAS, 365, 705, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09705.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09705.x 2006

  59. [59]

    R., Oonk, J

    Tremblay, G. R., Oonk, J. B. R., Combes, F., et al. 2016, Nature, 534, 218, doi: 10.1038/nature17969

    work page doi:10.1038/nature17969 2016

  60. [60]

    L., Ishikawa, Y., et al

    Vayner, A., Zakamska, N. L., Ishikawa, Y., et al. 2023, ApJ, 955, 92, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ace784

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ace784 2023

  61. [61]

    M., Donahue, M., Bryan, G

    Voit, G. M., Donahue, M., Bryan, G. L., & McDonald, M. 2015, Nature, 519, 203, doi: 10.1038/nature14167

    work page doi:10.1038/nature14167 2015

  62. [62]

    M., Wibking, B

    Voit, G. M., Wibking, B. D., & Yaldiz, D. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2602.15121, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2602.15121

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.15121 2026

  63. [63]

    Wang, C., Ruszkowski, M., & Yang, H.-Y. K. 2020, MNRAS, 493, 4065, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa550

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa550 2020

  64. [64]

    D., Voit, G

    Wibking, B. D., Voit, G. M., & O’Shea, B. W. 2025, MNRAS, 544, 2577, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf1801

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1801 2025

  65. [65]

    , keywords =

    Wilman, R. J., Edge, A. C., & Johnstone, R. M. 2005, MNRAS, 359, 755, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.08956.x XRISM Collaboration, Audard, M., Awaki, H., et al. 2025, Nature, 638, 365, doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-08561-z

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.08956.x 2005