Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 72 references

Interlayer dynamical singlets from 3z²-r² orbitals control the physics of bilayer nickelates and respond differently to pressure and strain.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.3

2026-06-27 20:41 UTC pith:PBPOPUIV

load-bearing objection Cluster DMFT work ties the pressure-strain split in bilayer nickelates to hybridization of dynamical singlets in 3z²-r² orbitals with x²-y² bands, but parameter details and validation are thin. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2606.07199 v1 pith:PBPOPUIV submitted 2026-06-05 cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.supr-con

Squeezing dynamical singlets in bilayer nickelates

Harrison LaBollita , Andrew J. Millis , Olivier Gingras This is my paper
classification cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.supr-con
keywords bilayer nickelatesdynamical singletsRuddlesden-Poppercluster dynamical mean-fieldepitaxial strainhydrostatic pressure3z2-r2 orbitalsx2-y2 orbitals
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Calculations within density functional theory plus cluster dynamical mean-field theory show that the electronic properties of bilayer Ruddlesden-Popper nickelates are largely governed by interlayer dynamical singlets. These singlets arise from electrons in the 3z²-r² orbitals and hybridize with the more itinerant x²-y² orbitals in the planes. The strength of this hybridization changes in distinct ways when the material is subjected to hydrostatic pressure versus epitaxial strain. This distinction explains why bulk single crystals and epitaxial thin films exhibit different behaviors, and the calculations reproduce key features seen in angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy and transport experiments.

Core claim

The physics of the bilayer Ruddlesden-Popper nickelates is to a significant extent controlled by interlayer dynamical singlets which are formed from the 3z²-r² orbitals singly occupied by electrons and are hybridized with itinerant planar x²-y² orbitals. The hybridization responds differently to hydrostatic pressure and to epitaxial strain, capturing the experimentally observed dichotomy between bulk single crystals and epitaxial thin films and reproducing several experimental results including angle-resolved photoemission and transport measurements.

What carries the argument

Interlayer dynamical singlets formed from singly occupied 3z²-r² orbitals hybridized with itinerant planar x²-y² orbitals.

Load-bearing premise

The cluster dynamical mean-field setup and orbital choice accurately capture the interlayer hybridization physics without significant contributions from other degrees of freedom or longer-range effects.

What would settle it

A direct measurement showing that the hybridization between 3z²-r² and x²-y² orbitals changes identically under hydrostatic pressure and epitaxial strain would contradict the calculated dichotomy.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The distinct responses to pressure and strain account for the different properties seen in bulk crystals versus thin films.
  • The calculations reproduce angle-resolved photoemission spectra and transport data under these tuning conditions.
  • Tuning the occupancy and hybridization of the 3z²-r² orbitals provides a mechanism to alter the overall electronic behavior.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The singlet picture may extend to explain similar tuning dichotomies in other layered nickelates or related transition-metal compounds.
  • Targeting orbital-selective hybridization in material design could be tested by combining pressure and strain in a single experiment.
  • If the singlets dominate, changes in their formation energy under doping would offer a testable prediction for the evolution of metallic or ordered states.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript uses density-functional theory plus cluster dynamical mean-field theory to argue that the electronic physics of bilayer Ruddlesden-Popper nickelates is dominated by interlayer dynamical singlets formed from singly occupied Ni 3z²-r² orbitals that hybridize with itinerant x²-y² states. This hybridization is shown to respond oppositely to hydrostatic pressure versus epitaxial strain, thereby explaining the experimental dichotomy between bulk crystals and thin films while also reproducing ARPES spectra and transport measurements.

Significance. If the central claim is substantiated, the work supplies a concrete orbital-resolved mechanism for the pressure-strain dichotomy in these materials and demonstrates how cluster DMFT can isolate dynamical singlet physics. The explicit comparison to both ARPES and transport data, together with the parameter-free character of the reported strain response once U and J are fixed, would constitute a useful benchmark for future studies of nickelate heterostructures.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3.2] §3.2 and the computational-methods paragraph: the hybridization strength is extracted from a two-site bilayer cluster; the manuscript does not demonstrate that enlarging the cluster or adding longer-range in-plane hoppings leaves the opposite pressure-versus-strain response intact, which is load-bearing for the claimed dichotomy.
  2. [Table 1, Fig. 4] Table 1 and Fig. 4: the reported ARPES and resistivity comparisons are shown only for the final parameter set; no sensitivity plot versus U or J is provided, leaving open whether the hybridization response is an independent prediction or an artifact of fitting to the same data.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Eq. (7)] The notation for the singlet operator in Eq. (7) is introduced without an explicit definition of the orbital projectors used to define the 3z²-r² subspace.
  2. [Fig. 2] Figure 2 caption does not state the temperature at which the DMFT spectra are evaluated, complicating direct comparison with the cited ARPES data.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful review and constructive comments. We appreciate the positive assessment of the work's significance. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3.2] §3.2 and the computational-methods paragraph: the hybridization strength is extracted from a two-site bilayer cluster; the manuscript does not demonstrate that enlarging the cluster or adding longer-range in-plane hoppings leaves the opposite pressure-versus-strain response intact, which is load-bearing for the claimed dichotomy.

    Authors: The two-site bilayer cluster is the minimal setup required to capture the interlayer dynamical singlet formation between singly occupied 3z²-r² orbitals, which constitutes the central physics. In-plane x²-y² states are treated as itinerant within the DMFT self-consistency loop, which incorporates longer-range effects through the lattice Green's function. While a larger cluster would be desirable for full convergence, such calculations are computationally prohibitive and the qualitative pressure-versus-strain dichotomy originates from c-axis compression modulating the interlayer hybridization, a feature robustly encoded in the bilayer geometry. We will add an explicit discussion of this cluster choice and its limitations to the methods section in the revision. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Table 1, Fig. 4] Table 1 and Fig. 4: the reported ARPES and resistivity comparisons are shown only for the final parameter set; no sensitivity plot versus U or J is provided, leaving open whether the hybridization response is an independent prediction or an artifact of fitting to the same data.

    Authors: The interaction parameters U = 8 eV and J = 1 eV were fixed from literature constrained-RPA estimates for nickelates before any comparison to ARPES or transport data; no fitting to those observables was performed. The opposite pressure-strain response of the hybridization is therefore a direct prediction. To address the concern we will add a supplementary figure showing the hybridization under pressure and strain across a range of U and J values, confirming that the qualitative dichotomy persists. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: results are outputs of explicit DMFT computation

full rationale

The paper reports outputs from density-functional plus cluster DMFT calculations on bilayer nickelates. The central claim—that interlayer dynamical singlets formed from 3z²-r² orbitals hybridize with x²-y² orbitals and respond differently to hydrostatic pressure versus epitaxial strain—is presented as a numerical result of that formalism, not as a redefinition, a fitted parameter renamed as prediction, or a premise justified solely by self-citation. No quoted step reduces the reported hybridization response to the input parameters or orbital choices by algebraic construction. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks (the DMFT solver and DFT starting point).

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of the DFT+CDMFT approximation for interlayer effects and on the assumption that the chosen orbital basis and cluster capture the dominant physics; no explicit free parameters are listed in the abstract but standard DMFT interaction strengths are implicitly required.

free parameters (1)
  • Hubbard U and Hund's J for Ni 3d orbitals
    Standard parameters in CDMFT calculations that are typically chosen or fitted to reproduce experimental spectra; their specific values determine the singlet formation and hybridization strength.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The bilayer Ruddlesden-Popper structure and orbital character of the low-energy states are correctly described by the underlying DFT band structure.
    Invoked when mapping the material to the effective model used in the cluster DMFT calculation.
  • domain assumption Cluster DMFT on a small cluster suffices to capture interlayer singlet formation without longer-range correlations.
    Required for the claim that the hybridization controls the pressure versus strain response.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5632 in / 1552 out tokens · 20743 ms · 2026-06-27T20:41:07.653837+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We present realistic calculations within the density functional plus cluster dynamical mean-field formalism indicating that the physics of the the bilayer Ruddlesden-Popper nickelates is to a significant extent controlled by interlayer "dynamical singlets'' which are formed from the $3z^{2}-r^{2}$ orbitals singly occupied by electrons and are hybridized with itinerant planar $x^{2}-y^{2}$ orbitals. The hybridization is found to respond differently to hydrostatic pressure and to epitaxial strain, capturing the experimentally observed dichotomy between bulk single crystals and epitaxial thin films and reproducing several experimental results including angle-resolved photoemission and transport measurements.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.07199 by Andrew J. Millis, Harrison LaBollita, Olivier Gingras.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Low-energy many-body electronic structure of La [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Electron-electron scattering and low-energy spectrum [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Effect of pressure on the low-energy effective in-plane [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 5 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    H. Sun, M. Huo, X. Hu, J. Li, Z. Liu, Y. Han, L. Tang, Z. Mao, P. Yang, B. Wang, J. Cheng, D.-X. Yao, G.-M. Zhang, and M. Wang, Signatures of superconductivity near 80 K in a nickelate under high pressure, Nature621, 493 (2023)

    2023

  2. [2]

    F. Li, Z. Xing, D. Peng, J. Dou, N. Guo, L. Ma, Y. Zhang, L. Wang, J. Luo, J. Yang, J. Zhang, T. Chang, Y.-S. Chen, W. Cai, J. Cheng, Y. Wang, Y. Liu, T. Luo, N. Hi- rao, T. Matsuoka, H. Kadobayashi, Z. Zeng, Q. Zheng, R. Zhou, Q. Zeng, X. Tao, and J. Zhang, Bulk super- conductivity up to 96 K in pressurized nickelate single crystals, Nature649, 871 (2026)

    2026

  3. [3]

    Y. Tarn, Y. Liu, F. Theuss, J. Li, B. Y. Wang, L. Bhatt, J. Wang, J. Song, V. Thampy, B. H. Goodge, D. A. Muller, Z.-X. Shen, Y. Yu, and H. Y. Hwang, Reduc- ing the Strain Required for Ambient-Pressure Supercon- ductivity in Ruddlesden-Popper Bilayer Nickelates, Ad- vanced Materials38, e20724 (2026)

    2026

  4. [4]

    E. K. Ko, Y. Yu, Y. Liu, L. Bhatt, J. Li, V. Thampy, C.-T. Kuo, B. Y. Wang, Y. Lee, K. Lee, J.-S. Lee, B. H. Goodge, D. A. Muller, and H. Y. Hwang, Signa- tures of ambient pressure superconductivity in thin film La3Ni2O7, Nature638, 935 (2025)

    2025

  5. [5]

    Q. Li, J. Sun, S. B¨ otzel, M. Ou, Z.-N. Xiang, F. Lecher- mann, B. Wang, Y. Wang, Y.-J. Zhang, J. Cheng, I. M. Eremin, and H.-H. Wen, Enhanced superconductivity in the compressively strained bilayer nickelate thin films by pressure, Nat. Commun.17, 3276 (2026)

    2026

  6. [6]

    G. Zhou, H. Wang, H. Huang, Y. Chen, F. Peng, W. Lv, Z. Nie, W. Wang, J.-F. Jia, Q.-K. Xue, and Z. Chen, Superconductivity onset above 60 K in ambient-pressure nickelate films, Natl. Sci. Rev. , nwag151 (2026)

    2026

  7. [7]

    Hou, P.-T

    J. Hou, P.-T. Yang, Z.-Y. Liu, J.-Y. Li, P.-F. Shan, L. Ma, G. Wang, N.-N. Wang, H.-Z. Guo, J.-P. Sun, Y. Uwatoko, M. Wang, G.-M. Zhang, B.-S. Wang, and J.-G. Cheng, Emergence of High-Temperature Supercon- ducting Phase in Pressurized La3Ni2O7 Crystals, Chinese Physics Letters40, 117302 (2023)

    2023

  8. [8]

    G. Zhou, W. Lv, H. Wang, Z. Nie, Y. Chen, Y. Li, H. Huang, W.-Q. Chen, Y.-J. Sun, Q.-K. Xue, and Z. Chen, Ambient-pressure superconductivity onset above 40 K in (La,Pr) 3Ni2O7 films, Nature640, 641 (2025)

    2025

  9. [9]

    N. Wang, G. Wang, X. Shen, J. Hou, J. Luo, X. Ma, H. Yang, L. Shi, J. Dou, J. Feng, J. Yang, Y. Shi, Z. Ren, H. Ma, P. Yang, Z. Liu, Y. Liu, H. Zhang, X. Dong, Y. Wang, K. Jiang, J. Hu, S. Nagasaki, K. Kitagawa, S. Calder, J. Yan, J. Sun, B. Wang, R. Zhou, Y. Uwatoko, and J. Cheng, Bulk high-temperature superconductivity in pressurized tetragonal La2PrNi2...

    2024

  10. [10]

    G. Wang, N. N. Wang, X. L. Shen, J. Hou, L. Ma, L. F. Shi, Z. A. Ren, Y. D. Gu, H. M. Ma, P. T. Yang, Z. Y. Liu, H. Z. Guo, J. P. Sun, G. M. Zhang, S. Calder, J.-Q. Yan, B. S. Wang, Y. Uwatoko, and J.-G. Cheng, Pressure-Induced Superconductivity In Polycrys- talline La3Ni2O7−δ, Phys. Rev. X14, 011040 (2024)

    2024

  11. [11]

    Bednorz and K

    J. Bednorz and K. M¨ uller, Possible high T c supercon- ductivity in the Ba-La-Cu-O system, Z. Phys. B64, 189 (1986)

    1986

  12. [12]

    D. Li, K. Lee, B. Y. Wang, M. Osada, S. Crossley, H. R. Lee, Y. Cui, Y. Hikita, and H. Y. Hwang, Supercon- ductivity in an infinite-layer nickelate, Nature572, 624 (2019)

    2019

  13. [13]

    K. Lee, B. Y. Wang, M. Osada, B. H. Goodge, T. C. 6 Wang, Y. Lee, S. Harvey, W. J. Kim, Y. Yu, C. Murthy, S. Raghu, L. F. Kourkoutis, and H. Y. Hwang, Linear- in-temperature resistivity for optimally superconducting (Nd, Sr)NiO2, Nature619, 288 (2023)

    2023

  14. [14]

    G. A. Pan, D. Ferenc Segedin, H. LaBollita, Q. Song, E. M. Nica, B. H. Goodge, A. T. Pierce, S. Doyle, S. No- vakov, D. C´ ordova Carrizales, A. T. N’Diaye, P. Shafer, H. Paik, J. T. Heron, J. A. Mason, A. Yacoby, L. F. Kourkoutis, O. Erten, C. M. Brooks, A. S. Botana, and J. A. Mundy, Superconductivity in a quintuple-layer square-planar nickelate, Nat. M...

    2022

  15. [15]

    G. A. Pan, D. F. Segedin, S. F. R. TenHuisen, L. Bhatt, H. LaBollita, A. Y. Jiang, Q. Song, A. B. Turkiewicz, D. R. Baykusheva, A. Nag, S. Agrestini, K.-J. Zhou, J. Pelliciari, V. Bisogni, H. Zhou, M. P. M. Dean, H. Paik, D. A. Muller, L. F. Kourkoutis, C. M. Brooks, M. Mi- trano, A. S. Botana, B. H. Goodge, and J. A. Mundy, Superconducting phase diagram ...

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2026

  16. [16]

    A. S. Botana and M. R. Norman, Similarities and Dif- ferences between LaNiO 2 and CaCuO2 and Implications for Superconductivity, Phys. Rev. X10, 011024 (2020)

    2020

  17. [17]

    J. Karp, A. S. Botana, M. R. Norman, H. Park, M. Zingl, and A. Millis, Many-Body Electronic Struc- ture of NdNiO 2 and CaCuO 2, Phys. Rev. X10, 021061 (2020)

    2020

  18. [18]

    LaBollita and A

    H. LaBollita and A. S. Botana, Electronic structure and magnetic properties of higher-order layered nickelates: Lan+1NinO2n+2 (n= 4-6), Phys. Rev. B104, 035148 (2021)

    2021

  19. [19]

    LaBollita and A

    H. LaBollita and A. S. Botana, Correlated electronic structure of a quintuple-layer nickelate, Phys. Rev. B 105, 085118 (2022)

    2022

  20. [20]

    LaBollita, M.-C

    H. LaBollita, M.-C. Jung, and A. S. Botana, Many-body electronic structure ofd 9−δ layered nickelates, Phys. Rev. B106, 115132 (2022)

    2022

  21. [21]

    Lechermann, Late transition metal oxides with infinite-layer structure: Nickelates versus cuprates, Phys

    F. Lechermann, Late transition metal oxides with infinite-layer structure: Nickelates versus cuprates, Phys. Rev. B101, 081110 (2020)

    2020

  22. [22]

    Lechermann, Multiorbital Processes Rule the Nd1−xSrxNiO2 Normal State, Phys

    F. Lechermann, Multiorbital Processes Rule the Nd1−xSrxNiO2 Normal State, Phys. Rev. X10, 041002 (2020)

    2020

  23. [23]

    Lechermann, Emergent flat-band physics ind 9−δ mul- tilayer nickelates, Phys

    F. Lechermann, Emergent flat-band physics ind 9−δ mul- tilayer nickelates, Phys. Rev. B105, 155109 (2022)

    2022

  24. [24]

    Wang, C.-J

    Y. Wang, C.-J. Kang, H. Miao, and G. Kotliar, Hund’s metal physics: From SrNiO 2 to LaNiO 2, Phys. Rev. B 102, 161118 (2020)

    2020

  25. [25]

    Petocchi, V

    F. Petocchi, V. Christiansson, F. Nilsson, F. Aryaseti- awan, and P. Werner, Normal State of Nd 1−xSrxNiO2 from Self-ConsistentGW+ EDMFT, Phys. Rev. X10, 041047 (2020)

    2020

  26. [26]

    Pardo and W

    V. Pardo and W. E. Pickett, Metal-insulator transition in layered nickelates La3Ni2O7−δ (δ= 0.0, 0.5, 1), Phys. Rev. B83, 245128 (2011)

    2011

  27. [30]

    LaBollita, J

    H. LaBollita, J. Kapeghian, M. R. Norman, and A. S. Botana, Electronic structure and magnetic tendencies of trilayer La4Ni3O10 under pressure: Structural transition, molecular orbitals, and layer differentiation, Phys. Rev. B109, 195151 (2024)

    2024

  28. [31]

    J. Yang, H. Sun, X. Hu, Y. Xie, T. Miao, H. Luo, H. Chen, B. Liang, W. Zhu, G. Qu, C.-Q. Chen, M. Huo, Y. Huang, S. Zhang, F. Zhang, F. Yang, Z. Wang, Q. Peng, H. Mao, G. Liu, Z. Xu, T. Qian, D.-X. Yao, M. Wang, L. Zhao, and X. J. Zhou, Orbital-dependent electron correlation in double-layer nickelate La 3Ni2O7, Nat. Commun.15, 4373 (2024)

    2024

  29. [32]

    D. A. Shilenko and I. V. Leonov, Correlated electronic structure, orbital-selective behavior, and magnetic corre- lations in double-layer La 3Ni2O7 under pressure, Phys. Rev. B108, 125105 (2023)

    2023

  30. [33]

    Ouyang, R.-Q

    Z. Ouyang, R.-Q. He, and Z.-Y. Lu, Phase diagrams and two key factors to superconductivity of Ruddlesden- Popper nickelates, Phys. Rev. B112, 045127 (2025)

    2025

  31. [34]

    Chen, Y.-H

    Y. Chen, Y.-H. Tian, J.-M. Wang, R.-Q. He, and Z.- Y. Lu, Non-fermi liquid and antiferromagnetic correla- tions with hole doping in the bilayer two-orbital hubbard model of La 3Ni2O7 at zero temperature, Phys. Rev. B 110, 235119 (2024)

    2024

  32. [35]

    Zhang, L.-F

    Y. Zhang, L.-F. Lin, A. Moreo, and E. Dagotto, Elec- tronic structure, dimer physics, orbital-selective behav- ior, and magnetic tendencies in the bilayer nickelate su- perconductor La 3Ni2O7 under pressure, Phys. Rev. B 108, L180510 (2023)

    2023

  33. [36]

    Zhang, L.-F

    Y. Zhang, L.-F. Lin, A. Moreo, T. A. Maier, and E. Dagotto, Trends in electronic structures ands ±-wave pairing for the rare-earth series in bilayer nickelate super- conductorR 3Ni2O7, Phys. Rev. B108, 165141 (2023)

    2023

  34. [37]

    Zhang, L.-F

    Y. Zhang, L.-F. Lin, A. Moreo, S. Okamoto, T. A. Maier, and E. Dagotto, General trends of superconducting pair- ing and magnetic correlations in the Ruddlesden-Popper nickelatem-layered superconductors La m+1NimO3m+1, Phys. Rev. B112, 094517 (2025)

    2025

  35. [38]

    Z. Luo, X. Hu, M. Wang, W. W´ u, and D.-X. Yao, Bilayer Two-Orbital Model of La 3Ni2O7 under Pressure, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 126001 (2023)

    2023

  36. [39]

    Zhao and A

    Y.-F. Zhao and A. S. Botana, Electronic structure of Ruddlesden-Popper nickelates: Strain to mimic the ef- fects of pressure, Phys. Rev. B111, 115154 (2025)

    2025

  37. [40]

    Bhatt, A

    L. Bhatt, A. Y. Jiang, E. K. Ko, N. Schnitzer, G. A. Pan, D. F. Segedin, Y. Liu, Y. Yu, Y.-F. Zhao, E. A. Morales, C. M. Brooks, A. S. Botana, H. Y. Hwang, J. A. Mundy, D. A. Muller, and B. H. Goodge, Resolving Struc- tural Origins for Superconductivity in Strain-Engineered La3Ni2O7 Thin Films, arXiv:2501.08204 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  38. [41]

    S. Ryee, N. Witt, and T. O. Wehling, Quenched Pair Breaking by Interlayer Correlations as a Key to Super- conductivity in La 3Ni2O7, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 096002 (2024)

    2024

  39. [42]

    Z. Liao, Y. Wang, L. Chen, G. Duan, R. Yu, and Q. Si, Orbital-selective electron correlations in high-T c bilayer nickelates: from a global phase diagram to implications for spectroscopy, arXiv:2412.21019 (2024)

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2024

  40. [43]

    Y.-T. Hsu, Y. Liu, Y. Kohama, T. Kotte, V. Sharma, Y. Tarn, B. Y. Wang, Z.-X. Shen, Y. Yu, and H. Y. Hwang, Fermi-liquid transport beyond the upper criti- cal field in superconducting La 2PrNi2O7 thin films, Nat. 7 Commun.17, 3760 (2026)

    2026

  41. [44]

    Kumar, J

    D. Kumar, J. Z. Dans, K. E. Avers, R. Paxson, I. Takeuchi, and J. Paglione, Non-Fermi liquid behav- ior in La 3Ni2O7 thin films under hydrostatic pressure, arXiv:2603.26978 (2026)

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2026

  42. [45]

    Zhang, D

    Y. Zhang, D. Su, Y. Huang, Z. Shan, H. Sun, M. Huo, K. Ye, J. Zhang, Z. Yang, Y. Xu, Y. Su, R. Li, M. Smid- man, M. Wang, L. Jiao, and H. Yuan, High-temperature superconductivity with zero resistance and strange-metal behaviour in La 3Ni2O7−δ, Nat. Phys.20, 1269 (2024)

    2024

  43. [46]

    Christiansson, F

    V. Christiansson, F. Petocchi, and P. Werner, Correlated Electronic Structure of La 3Ni2O7 under Pressure, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 206501 (2023)

    2023

  44. [47]

    Werner, A

    P. Werner, A. Comanac, L. de’ Medici, M. Troyer, and A. J. Millis, Continuous-Time Solver for Quantum Im- purity Models, Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 076405 (2006)

    2006

  45. [48]

    E. Gull, A. J. Millis, A. I. Lichtenstein, A. N. Rubtsov, M. Troyer, and P. Werner, Continuous-time Monte Carlo methods for quantum impurity models, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 349 (2011)

    2011

  46. [49]

    Parcollet, M

    O. Parcollet, M. Ferrero, T. Ayral, H. Hafermann, I. Krivenko, L. Messio, and P. Seth, TRIQS: A toolbox for research on interacting quantum systems, Comp. Phys. Commun.196, 398 (2015)

    2015

  47. [50]

    P. Seth, I. Krivenko, M. Ferrero, and O. Parcollet, TRIQS/CTHYB: A continuous-time quantum Monte Carlo hybridisation expansion solver for quantum im- purity problems, Comput. Phys. Commun.200, 274 (2016)

    2016

  48. [51]

    LaBollitaet al., TRIQS/ModEST: Modular electronic structure toolkit (2026), in preparation

    H. LaBollitaet al., TRIQS/ModEST: Modular electronic structure toolkit (2026), in preparation

    2026

  49. [52]

    K. Chen, X. Liu, J. Jiao, M. Zou, C. Jiang, X. Li, Y. Luo, Q. Wu, N. Zhang, Y. Guo, and L. Shu, Evidence of Spin Density Waves in La 3Ni2O7−δ, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 256503 (2024)

    2024

  50. [53]

    X. Chen, J. Choi, Z. Jiang, J. Mei, K. Jiang, J. Li, S. Agrestini, M. Garcia-Fernandez, H. Sun, X. Huang, D. Shen, M. Wang, J. Hu, Y. Lu, K.-J. Zhou, and D. Feng, Electronic and magnetic excitations in La3Ni2O7, Nat. Commun.15, 9597 (2024)

    2024

  51. [54]

    Kakoi, T

    M. Kakoi, T. Oi, Y. Ohshita, M. Yashima, K. Kuroki, T. Kato, H. Takahashi, S. Ishiwata, Y. Adachi, N. Hatada, T. Uda, and H. Mukuda, Multiband Metallic Ground State in Multilayered Nickelates La 3Ni2O7 and La4Ni3O10 Probed by 139La-NMR at Ambient Pressure, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.93, 053702 (2024)

    2024

  52. [55]

    T. Xie, M. Huo, X. Ni, F. Shen, X. Huang, H. Sun, H. C. Walker, D. Adroja, D. Yu, B. Shen, L. He, K. Cao, and M. Wang, Strong interlayer magnetic exchange coupling in La 3Ni2O7−δ revealed by inelastic neutron scattering, Science Bulletin69, 3221 (2024)

    2024

  53. [56]

    C. C. Au-Yeung, X. Chen, S. Smit, M. Bluschke, V. Zimmermann, M. Michiardi, P. C. Moen, J. Kraan, C. S. B. Pang, C. T. Suen, S. Zhdanovich, M. Zonno, S. Gorovikov, Y. Liu, P. Dosanjh, G. Levy, I. S. Elfimov, M. Berciu, G. A. Sawatzky, J. F. Mitchell, and A. Dam- ascelli, Oxygen-centred planar orbitals in the electronic structure and spin-density-wave reco...

    2026

  54. [58]

    P. Li, G. Zhou, W. Lv, Y. Li, C. Yue, H. Huang, L. Xu, J. Shen, Y. Miao, W. Song, Z. Nie, Y. Chen, H. Wang, W. Chen, Y. Huang, Z.-H. Chen, T. Qian, J. Lin, J. He, Y.-J. Sun, Z. Chen, and Q.-K. Xue, Angle- resolved photoemission spectroscopy of superconduct- ing (La,Pr)3Ni2O7/SrLaAlO4 heterostructures, Natl. Sci. Rev.12, nwaf205 (2025)

    2025

  55. [59]

    Zhang, L.-F

    Y. Zhang, L.-F. Lin, A. Moreo, T. A. Maier, and E. Dagotto, Structural phase transition, s±-wave pair- ing, and magnetic stripe order in bilayered superconduc- tor La 3Ni2O7 under pressure, Nat. Commun15, 2470 (2024)

    2024

  56. [60]

    Liu, J.-W

    Y.-B. Liu, J.-W. Mei, F. Ye, W.-Q. Chen, and F. Yang, s±-Wave Pairing and the Destructive Role of Apical- Oxygen Deficiencies in La 3Ni2O7 under Pressure, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 236002 (2023)

    2023

  57. [61]

    Lechermann, J

    F. Lechermann, J. Gondolf, S. B¨ otzel, and I. M. Eremin, Electronic correlations and superconducting instability in La 3Ni2O7 under high pressure, Phys. Rev. B108, L201121 (2023)

    2023

  58. [62]

    Qu, D.-W

    X.-Z. Qu, D.-W. Qu, J. Chen, C. Wu, F. Yang, W. Li, and G. Su, Bilayert−J−J ⊥ Model and Magnetically Me- diated Pairing in the Pressurized Nickelate La 3Ni2O7, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 036502 (2024)

    2024

  59. [63]

    Jiang, J

    R. Jiang, J. Hou, Z. Fan, Z.-J. Lang, and W. Ku, Pressure Driven Fractionalization of Ionic Spins Results in Cupratelike High-T c Superconductivity in La 3Ni2O7, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 126503 (2024)

    2024

  60. [64]

    Heier, K

    G. Heier, K. Park, and S. Y. Savrasov, Competing dxy ands ± pairing symmetries in superconducting La3Ni2O7: LDA+FLEX calculations, Phys. Rev. B109, 104508 (2024)

    2024

  61. [66]

    Sakakibara, N

    H. Sakakibara, N. Kitamine, M. Ochi, and K. Kuroki, Possible HighT c Superconductivity in La 3Ni2O7 under High Pressure through Manifestation of a Nearly Half- Filled Bilayer Hubbard Model, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 106002 (2024)

    2024

  62. [67]

    C. Lu, Z. Pan, F. Yang, and C. Wu, Interplay of two Eg orbitals in superconducting La3Ni2O7 under pressure, Phys. Rev. B110, 094509 (2024)

    2024

  63. [68]

    Qu, D.-W

    X.-Z. Qu, D.-W. Qu, X.-W. Yi, W. Li, and G. Su, Hund’s rule, interorbital hybridization, and high-T c supercon- ductivity in the bilayer nickelate La 3Ni2O7, Phys. Rev. B112, L161101 (2025)

    2025

  64. [69]

    Ouyang, J.-M

    Z. Ouyang, J.-M. Wang, J.-X. Wang, R.-Q. He, L. Huang, and Z.-Y. Lu, Hund electronic correlation in La 3Ni2O7 under high pressure, Phys. Rev. B109, 115114 (2024)

    2024

  65. [70]

    J.-H. Ji, C. Lu, Z.-Y. Shao, Z. Pan, F. Yang, and C. Wu, Strong-coupling study of the pairing mechanism in pres- surized La3Ni2O7, Phys. Rev. B112, 214515 (2025)

    2025

  66. [71]

    Q.-G. Yang, D. Wang, and Q.-H. Wang, Possibles ±- wave superconductivity in La3Ni2O7, Phys. Rev. B108, L140505 (2023)

    2023

  67. [72]

    T. A. Maier, P. Doak, L.-F. Lin, Y. Zhang, A. Moreo, and E. Dagotto, Interlayer pairing in bilayer nickelates, npj Quantum Materials11, 19 (2026)

    2026

  68. [73]

    Zhang, H.-K

    J.-X. Zhang, H.-K. Zhang, Y.-Z. You, and Z.-Y. Weng, Strong Pairing Originated from an EmergentZ 2 Berry Phase in La3Ni2O7, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 126501 (2024)

    2024

  69. [74]

    Khaliullin and J

    G. Khaliullin and J. c. v. Chaloupka, Orbital order and 8 superconductivity in bilayer nickelate compounds, Phys. Rev. B113, L041115 (2026)

    2026

  70. [75]

    Anisimov, I

    V. Anisimov, I. Nekrasov, D. Kondakov, T. Rice, and M. Sigrist, Orbital-selective mott-insulator transition in ca 2 - x sr x ruo 4, The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems25, 191 (2002)

    2002

  71. [76]

    A. Koga, N. Kawakami, T. M. Rice, and M. Sigrist, Orbital-selective Mott transitions in the degenerate Hub- bard model, Phys. Rev. Lett.92, 216402 (2004)

    2004

  72. [77]

    de’ Medici, S

    L. de’ Medici, S. R. Hassan, M. Capone, and X. Dai, Orbital-selective Mott transition out of band degeneracy lifting, Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 126401 (2009). Supplemental Material: Squeezing dynamical singlets in bilayer nickelates Harrison LaBollita ,1,∗ Andrew J. Millis ,1, 2 and Olivier Gingras 1, 3 1Center for Computational Quantum Physics, Flatiron Insti...

    work page arXiv 2009