Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 4 cited by

A thin film of the nickelate La3Ni2O7 leaves Fermi-liquid behavior at just 1.41 GPa of hydrostatic pressure.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-02 17:12 UTC pith:NMH5X2GB

load-bearing objection Plausible but under-quantified: the T^1.4 shift is likely real, but a single film, no error bars, and a freezing pressure medium leave the exponent one notch short of solid. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2603.26978 v1 pith:NMH5X2GB submitted 2026-03-27 cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.supr-con

Non-Fermi liquid behavior in La₃Ni₂O₇ thin films under hydrostatic pressure

Deepak Kumar , Jared Z. Dans , Keenan E. Avers , Ryan Paxson , Ichiro Takeuchi , Johnpierre Paglione This is my paper
classification cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.supr-con
keywords La3Ni2O7bilayer nickelatethin filmshydrostatic pressurenon-Fermi liquidFermi liquidquantum critical pointspin-density wave
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reports that a thin film of the bilayer nickelate La3Ni2O7, grown on LaAlO3, stops behaving like a Fermi liquid when squeezed to only 1.41 GPa: its low-temperature resistance follows R0 + A T^1.4 instead of the T^2 law of ordinary metals. At 0.53 GPa the same film still shows T^2 behavior, so a modest increase in pressure drives the crossover. The authors read this as evidence that the film sits near a quantum critical point tied to spin-density-wave order, making the normal state highly tunable in thin-film form. The result matters because bulk crystals of the same material need roughly ten times higher pressure to show comparable non-Fermi-liquid behavior, so films offer a low-pressure platform to study the physics behind nickelate superconductivity.

Core claim

On a fully strained La3Ni2O7 film on LaAlO3(001), resistance was measured under hydrostatic pressure in a piston-cylinder cell. At ambient pressure, the low-temperature resistance fits a Kondo-like form −ln(T)+T^γ; at 0.53 GPa it fits R0+AT^2, the Fermi-liquid expectation; at 1.41 GPa it fits R0+AT^1.4 from 1.8 K to 60 K. The exponent change with only about 0.9 GPa additional pressure—6–8% of the pressure used in diamond-anvil-cell studies on bulk crystals—is the central observation. The paper attributes this crossover to proximity to a spin-density-wave quantum critical point, with epitaxial strain and oxygen tuning placing the film close to the ordered phase at ambient pressure.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing quantity is the exponent α in the power law R(T)=R0+AT^α, extracted from low-temperature resistance fits. The proposed mechanism is quantum-critical spin-fluctuation scattering: α=2 is Fermi-liquid, α≈1.4 sits between the values expected for two-dimensional ferromagnetic (4/3) and three-dimensional antiferromagnetic (3/2) fluctuations, and the authors argue it approaches α=1 (strange-metal behavior) at slightly higher pressure. The combination of epitaxial compressive strain from the substrate and applied hydrostatic pressure is what tunes the system toward the critical point.

Load-bearing premise

The central claim rests on the unverified assumption that the α≈1.4 power law measured on a single film is intrinsic electronic behavior, not an artifact of pressure inhomogeneity, film cracking, or a strain-induced structural transition.

What would settle it

A second film from the same growth batch, pressurized under identical conditions, fails to show the crossover from α≈2 to α≈1.4 between 0.53 and 1.41 GPa—or post-pressure X-ray diffraction reveals cracks or a phase transition—would falsify the intrinsic interpretation.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • At 1.41 GPa, non-Fermi-liquid transport (α≈1.4) is accessible in a laboratory using modest piston-cylinder pressure rather than diamond-anvil cells.
  • Pressure suppresses the low-temperature Kondo-like upturn seen at ambient pressure, indicating a tunable crossover in the normal-state scattering.
  • The rapid exponent change suggests the film is near a quantum critical point; slightly higher pressures may drive α toward 1, as seen in other nickelate systems.
  • Films on YAlO3(110) show a resistance and Hall anomaly near 120 K attributed to spin-density-wave order, while fully strained LAO films do not show this anomaly.
  • Annealing in molecular oxygen alone does not induce superconductivity in these films; ozone appears necessary to fill oxygen vacancies efficiently.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the pressure shift is intrinsic, epitaxial strain may act like a large effective negative pressure, which would explain why about 1.4 GPa on a film mimics effects seen at much higher pressure in bulk; this can be tested by comparing films on substrates with different lattice mismatch under the same pressure.
  • A finer pressure sweep with small increments between 0.53 and 1.41 GPa would reveal whether α evolves continuously or jumps; a continuous crossover would support quantum criticality, while a jump would point to a first-order structural or electronic transition.
  • The single-film measurement leaves open the possibility that film cracking or freezing of the pressure medium produced the apparent exponent; repeating the measurement on multiple films with structural verification before and after pressure would settle this.
  • The ambient-pressure Kondo-like upturn could be distinguished from quantum-critical scattering by measuring magnetoresistance or Hall response under pressure.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports growth of bilayer La3Ni2O7 thin films on LAO(001), SLAO(001), and YAO(110) substrates, characterization by RHEED/XRD, transport and Hall measurements, and high-pressure resistance measurements using a piston-cylinder cell with Daphne 7575 oil. The central claim is that for a film on LAO(001), increasing hydrostatic pressure from ambient to 0.53 GPa changes the low-temperature resistance from a Kondo-like form to R(T)=R0+AT^2, and further pressure to 1.41 GPa changes it to R0+AT^1.4 over 1.8–60 K. This 2→1.4 evolution is interpreted as a crossover to non-Fermi liquid behavior driven by proximity to a spin-density-wave quantum critical point, at pressures only 6–8% of those used in bulk diamond-anvil-cell studies.

Significance. If established, the main result is significant: it would show that strain and oxygen stoichiometry in thin-film La3Ni2O7 place the system much closer to a pressure-tuned quantum critical point than bulk crystals, and that modest pressures can induce NFL transport. The paper has clear strengths: growth on multiple substrates with RHEED/XRD characterization, systematic oxygen-annealing comparisons, Hall measurements on two substrates, and a qualitatively documented pressure evolution of R(T). However, the central claim rests almost entirely on power-law exponents extracted from a single film at one pressure, without error bars, residual analysis, range-sensitivity tests, or a check that the pressure medium remains hydrostatic at low temperature. The extrinsic-to-intrinsic attribution of the T^1.4 exponent is therefore not yet secured, and the quantum-critical interpretation outruns the current data.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. III, Fig. 4(b)] The load-bearing claim is that α=1.4 at 1.41 GPa, but the manuscript reports no confidence interval, residual analysis, or comparison against competing exponents (e.g., T^3/2, T^4/3, or T^2 with a different R0). The fit R(T)=R0+AT^α has a strong R0–α trade-off, so the figure alone does not establish that α=1.4 is uniquely preferred. Please report the fitted parameters with uncertainties, show residuals, and test the sensitivity of α to the fitting window (e.g., 1.8–30 K vs 1.8–60 K).
  2. [Sec. II, high-pressure methods] Daphne 7575 oil is known to solidify at low temperatures; at 1.41 GPa and 1.8 K the medium may be nonhydrostatic or frozen, producing strain gradients or pressure inhomogeneity that could mimic a non-Fermi-liquid power law. No low-temperature hydrostaticity check is reported. Please provide evidence that the pressure medium remains hydrostatic at the measurement temperatures, or discuss the expected freezing point and its consequences for the extracted exponent.
  3. [Sec. III, Fig. 4] The T^2→T^1.4 evolution is demonstrated for one film at one pressure point. No replicate sample or repeat pressure run is shown, and there is no post-pressure XRD, AFM, or microscopy to confirm that the film structure and electrical continuity are unchanged after pressurization. Since the ambient-pressure low-temperature upturn is acknowledged in the text to 'be attributable to... structural disorder,' extrinsic contributions are plausible. Please add a reproducibility check and a post-pressure structural/electrical characterization, or explicitly state the corresponding limitations.
  4. [Sec. III, Discussion of QCP] The interpretation that α=1.4 indicates proximity to a spin-density-wave QCP is based on three pressure points and a single exponent. The text itself notes that 'measurements over a wider pressure range are required to understand the quantitative distance to the critical point,' but the abstract and conclusions nonetheless assert proximity to a QCP. This does not invalidate the empirical finding, but the conclusion should be reworded as a hypothesis unless additional pressure points and a measured tuning parameter (e.g., evolution of α with pressure, or suppression of an ordered phase) are provided.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Conclusions] There is a grammatical error: 'in not enough to induce superconductivity' should be 'is not enough.'
  2. [Sec. III, Fig. 4(b) and Conclusions] The pressure is given as 0.53 GPa in the text but 0.52 GPa in the Conclusions. Please make the values consistent.
  3. [Fig. 3 caption] The symbols R_xy are used for sheet resistance in some panels and Hall resistance in others. This is confusing; please use distinct notation for longitudinal and Hall resistances.
  4. [Abstract and Introduction] The statement that 1.41 GPa is '6–8%' of DAC pressures is ambiguous: 1.41/14 GPa ≈ 10%, and 0.53/14 GPa ≈ 3.8%. Please clarify which reference pressure is used and how the 6–8% figure is obtained.
  5. [Sec. III, Hall data] The transition 'around 117 K' is marked by a dashed guide line, but no quantitative determination of the transition temperature or its uncertainty is given. If this transition is used as evidence of SDW ordering, please show how the value was extracted.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the paper reports empirical power-law fits and benchmarks them against external theoretical results.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is an observed change in the low-temperature resistance exponent of one La3Ni2O7 film on LAO(001) under hydrostatic pressure: R(T)=R0+A T^2 at 0.53 GPa and R(T)=R0+A T^1.4 at 1.41 GPa (Fig. 4b; Section III). This is a direct fit to measured data, not a quantity re-used to predict itself; the extracted α is the report, not a prediction generated from the fit. The interpretation that α=1.4 signals proximity to a QCP is supported by an external benchmark (Stewart's RMP 2001 classification and spin-fluctuation exponents [29]) and by comparisons to other nickelate, iron-based, and cuprate systems; none of these citations is by the present authors or otherwise load-bearing as a self-citation chain. The paper's own limitations are stated: 'While measurements over a wider pressure range are required to understand the quantitative distance to the critical point itself' (Section III), and 'Additional experiments are warranted to elucidate the nature of the ordering at this transition' (Section III). Those caveats concern robustness and interpretation, not circularity. No fitted parameter is renamed as an independent prediction, no uniqueness theorem is imported, and no ansatz is smuggled in via citation. The main experimental weakness—lack of error bars on α, no low-T hydrostaticity check, single film—is a correctness/robustness risk, not a circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper's central claim is an empirical power-law fit; it introduces no free parameters beyond the fitted resistance law. Every claim about quantum criticality rests on external theoretical benchmarks, not on a derivation.

free parameters (3)
  • α (power-law exponent at 1.41 GPa) = 1.4
    From fit to R(T) between 1.8 K and 60 K; no error bar reported (Fig. 4b)
  • α (power-law exponent at 0.53 GPa) = 2.0
    From fit to R(T); interpreted as Fermi liquid T^2 (Fig. 4b)
  • γ (Kondo-model exponent at ambient pressure) = 1.9
    From fit R ∝ -ln T + T^γ at 0 GPa; the exponent is near 2 but with additional log term (Fig. 4b)
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption The film is single-phase, fully strained bilayer La3Ni2O7 on LAO(001)
    Inferred from XRD (00l) reflections and c-axis lattice constant; no RSM or TEM confirmation provided (Section III, Fig. 1d)
  • domain assumption Daphne 7575 oil remains effectively hydrostatic in the piston-cylinder cell at low temperatures and pressures up to 1.41 GPa
    Standard assumption for this pressure medium; not verified in situ for this sample (Section II)
  • domain assumption The low-temperature resistance upturn at ambient pressure is Kondo-like, described by R ∝ -ln T + T^γ
    This model is assumed to fit the data; no alternatives (e.g., weak localization, electron–electron interaction) are tested (Section III)
  • domain assumption α=1.4 is indicative of non-Fermi liquid behavior near a quantum critical point of a spin-density-wave order
    Interpretation based on comparison with theoretical exponents from Ref. [29]; no direct magnetic probe is used (Section III)

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 10785 in / 11222 out tokens · 101017 ms · 2026-08-02T17:12:45.112252+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

The discovery of superconductivity in bilayer nickel-oxides has revived an intense effort to understand the potential of high-temperature superconductivity in these materials and their relation to cuprate superconductors. In this work, we investigate the growth and properties of bilayer La$_3$Ni$_2$O$_7$ thin films as a function of substrate, oxygen treatment and applied pressure in order to study the evolution of transport properties. We report epitaxial growth of La$_3$Ni$_2$O$_7$ thin films on LaAlO$_3$ (LAO) (001) and SrLaAlO$_4$ (SLAO) (001) substrates, and the effects of ex-situ annealing in a high pressure furnace under an oxygen-rich environment. Transport measurements show that the La$_3$Ni$_2$O$_7$ thin films on LAO(001) exhibit Fermi liquid-like metallic behavior with a slight Kondo-like upturn at low temperatures, which evolves with the application of modest hydrostatic pressures toward non-Fermi liquid behavior with a temperature dependence of resistance approaching $\sim$ T$^{1.4}$ at 1.41 GPa. The ability to tune the normal state resistivity of La$_3$Ni$_2$O$_7$ films to display non-Fermi liquid behavior under such a modest hydrostatic pressure range - only 6 - 8 % of that typically applied via diamond anvil cell (DAC) in La$_3$Ni$_2$O$_7$ single crystals to achieve comparable effects - is both noteworthy and unexpected. These findings imply the strong tunability of La$_3$Ni$_2$O$_7$ in thin film form and the likely proximity of a strongly fluctuating ordered state leading to non-Fermi liquid behavior under even modest applied pressures.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.26978 by Deepak Kumar, Ichiro Takeuchi, Jared Z. Dans, Johnpierre Paglione, Keenan E. Avers, Ryan Paxson.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: presents an overview of the structural characterization of 6-7 nm La3Ni2O7 (LNO327) thin films deposited on LaAlO3 (LAO)(001) and SrLaAlO4 (SLAO)(001) substrates, which exhibit nominal lattice mismatches of approximately -1.1 % and -2 %, respec￾tively, as depicted schematically in Figure 1a. The nega￾tive values indicate that the films experience compressive strain during growth. The film growth was carefu… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: presents the transport measurements of LNO327 films on LAO(001) (Figures 2a and 2b) and SLAO(001) (Figure 2c) substrates. The film grown on an LAO substrate demonstrates typical Fermi-liquid metal￾lic behavior, consistent with previous studies [8, 15]. Since nickelate thin films are often affected by oxygen deficiencies [7, 8, 11, 12], additional annealing was con￾ducted both in-situ in the PLD chamber and… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: b) and carrier concentration (n, Fig. 3c). As shown in Fig. 3b, the calculated Hall coefficient RH is positive at measured temperatures and decreases with increasing temperature. Such behavior may indicate multiband electronic structure of the LNO327 films, where electronic structure near the Fermi surface is dominated by Ni 3d orbitals (3dz 2 and 3dx2−y2 ) and is consistent with previous results [7, 8, 14… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (b). At ambient pressure, the data align best with a Kondo model described by R ∝ –ln(T) + T γ . Under increased pressure, the optimal fit transitions to a simple power law: R(T) = R0 + ATα. Up to 0.53 GPa, the measured power law is consistent with Fermi liquid be￾havior, characterized by a T 2 dependence of resistance due to quasiparticle-quasiparticle scattering. However, upon further pressure increase t… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. A unified theory of thin film and bulk bilayer nickelates

    cond-mat.supr-con 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A two-component scenario unifies key observations in bilayer nickelate superconductivity, predicting doping-dependent superconducting domes and normal-state behaviors that differ by interlayer coupling strength.

  2. Squeezing dynamical singlets in bilayer nickelates

    cond-mat.str-el 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Dynamical singlets from 3z²-r² orbitals hybridized with x²-y² orbitals control the distinct pressure versus strain responses in bilayer nickelates.

  3. Superconductivity in bilayer La$_3$Ni$_2$O$_7$: A review focusing on the strong-coupling Hund's rule assisted pairing mechanism

    cond-mat.supr-con 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    Superconductivity in La3Ni2O7 arises from interlayer Cooper pairs of 3d_x2-y2 electrons driven by effective J_perp from Hund-assisted AFM exchange transfer, while localized 3d_z2 electrons form rung singlets that prod...

  4. Superconductivity in Ruddlesden-Popper nickelates: a review of recent progress, focusing on thin films

    cond-mat.supr-con 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    The review covers experimental and theoretical progress on superconductivity in Ruddlesden-Popper nickelates, emphasizing ambient-pressure thin-film results in La3Ni2O7.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

35 extracted references · 2 linked inside Pith · cited by 4 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Y.; Osada, M.; Crossley, S.; Lee, H

    Li, D.; Lee, K.; Wang, B. Y.; Osada, M.; Crossley, S.; Lee, H. R.; Cui, Y.; Hikita, Y.; Hwang, H. Y. Supercon- ductivity in an Infinite-Layer Nickelate. Nature 2019, 572 (7771), 624–627

    2019

  2. [2]

    Signatures of Superconductivity near 80 K in a Nickelate under High Pressure

    Sun, H.; Huo, M.; Hu, X.; Li, J.; Liu, Z.; Han, Y.; Tang, L.; Mao, Z.; Yang, P.; Wang, B.; Cheng, J.; Yao, D.-X.; Zhang, G.-M.; Wang, M. Signatures of Superconductivity near 80 K in a Nickelate under High Pressure. Nature 2023, 621 (7979), 493–498

    2023

  3. [3]

    S.; Sharma, S.; LaBol- lita, H.; Peterson, G.; Zheng, H.; Phelan, D

    Chen, X.; Zhang, J.; Thind, A. S.; Sharma, S.; LaBol- lita, H.; Peterson, G.; Zheng, H.; Phelan, D. P.; Botana, A. S.; Klie, R. F.; Mitchell, J. F. Polymorphism in the Ruddlesden–Popper Nickelate La 3Ni2O7: Discovery of a Hidden Phase with Distinctive Layer Stacking. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2024, 146 (6), 3640–3645

    2024

  4. [4]

    Bulk High- Temperature Superconductivity in Pressurized Tetrago- nal La2PrNi2O7

    Wang, N.; Wang, G.; Shen, X.; Hou, J.; Luo, J.; Ma, X.; Yang, H.; Shi, L.; Dou, J.; Feng, J.; Yang, J.; Shi, Y.; Ren, Z.; Ma, H.; Yang, P.; Liu, Z.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, H.; Dong, X.; Wang, Y.; Jiang, K.; Hu, J.; Na- gasaki, S.; Kitagawa, K.; Calder, S.; Yan, J.; Sun, J.; Wang, B.; Zhou, R.; Uwatoko, Y.; Cheng, J. Bulk High- Temperature Superconductivity in Pr...

    2024

  5. [5]

    Superconductivity in Sr-Doped La 3Ni2O7 Thin Films

    Hao, B.; Wang, M.; Sun, W.; Yang, Y.; Mao, Z.; Yan, S.; Sun, H.; Zhang, H.; Han, L.; Gu, Z.; Zhou, J.; Ji, D.; Nie, Y. Superconductivity in Sr-Doped La 3Ni2O7 Thin Films. Nat. Mater. 2025, 24 (11), 1756–1762

    2025

  6. [6]

    Signatures of spin-glass su- perconductivity in nickelate (La, Pr, Sm) 3Ni2O7 films

    Haoran Ji, Zheyuan Xie, Yaqi Chen, Guangdi Zhou, Longxin Pan, Heng Wang, Haoliang Huang, Jun Ge, Yi Liu, Guang-Ming Zhang, Ziqiang Wang, Qi-Kun Xue, Zhuoyu Chen, Jian Wang. Signatures of spin-glass su- perconductivity in nickelate (La, Pr, Sm) 3Ni2O7 films. arXiv:2508.16412

    arXiv

  7. [7]

    K.; Tarn, Y.; Bhatt, L.; Li, J.; Thampy, V.; Goodge, B

    Liu, Y.; Ko, E. K.; Tarn, Y.; Bhatt, L.; Li, J.; Thampy, V.; Goodge, B. H.; Muller, D. A.; Raghu, S.; Yu, Y.; Hwang, H. Y. Superconductivity and Normal-State Transport in Compressively Strained La 2PrNi2O7 Thin Films. Nat. Mater. 2025, 24 (8), 1221–1227

    2025

  8. [8]

    K.; Yu, Y.; Liu, Y.; Bhatt, L.; Li, J.; Thampy, V.; Kuo, C.-T.; Wang, B

    Ko, E. K.; Yu, Y.; Liu, Y.; Bhatt, L.; Li, J.; Thampy, V.; Kuo, C.-T.; Wang, B. Y.; Lee, Y.; Lee, K.; Lee, J.-S.; Goodge, B. H.; Muller, D. A.; Hwang, H. Y. Sig- natures of Ambient Pressure Superconductivity in Thin Film La3Ni2O7. Nature 2025, 638 (8052), 935–940. 7

    2025

  9. [9]

    Strain-Tuning for Superconductivity in La 3Ni2O7 Thin Films

    Osada, M.; Terakura, C.; Kikkawa, A.; Nakajima, M.; Chen, H.-Y.; Nomura, Y.; Tokura, Y.; Tsukazaki, A. Strain-Tuning for Superconductivity in La 3Ni2O7 Thin Films. Commun Phys 2025, 8 (1), 251

    2025

  10. [10]

    B.; Ravichandran, J.; Chu, Y.- H.; Lee, Y.-W.; Yang, C.-H.; Ramesh, R.; Jeong, Y

    Biswas, A.; Rossen, P. B.; Ravichandran, J.; Chu, Y.- H.; Lee, Y.-W.; Yang, C.-H.; Ramesh, R.; Jeong, Y. H. Selective A- or B-Site Single Termination on Surfaces of Layered Oxide SrLaAlO4. Applied Physics Letters 2013, 102 (5), 051603

    2013

  11. [11]

    Impact of Pressure and Apical Oxygen Vacancies on Superconduc- tivity in La 3Ni2O7

    Lu, C.; Zhang, M.; Pan, Z.; Wu, C.; Yang, F. Impact of Pressure and Apical Oxygen Vacancies on Superconduc- tivity in La 3Ni2O7. Commun Phys 2025, 8 (1), 354

    2025

  12. [12]

    Ambient-Pressure Superconductivity Onset above 40 K in (La,Pr) 3Ni2O7 Films

    Zhou, G.; Lv, W.; Wang, H.; Nie, Z.; Chen, Y.; Li, Y.; Huang, H.; Chen, W.-Q.; Sun, Y.-J.; Xue, Q.-K.; Chen, Z. Ambient-Pressure Superconductivity Onset above 40 K in (La,Pr) 3Ni2O7 Films. Nature 2025, 640 (8059), 641–646

    2025

  13. [13]

    Y.; Lee, K.; Li, D.; Hwang, H

    Osada, M.; Wang, B. Y.; Lee, K.; Li, D.; Hwang, H. Y. Phase Diagram of Infinite Layer Praseodymium Nickelate Pr1−xSrxNiO2 Thin Films. Phys. Rev. Materials 2020, 4 (12), 121801

    2020

  14. [14]

    Elec- tronic Structures and Multi-Orbital Models of La 3Ni2O7 Thin Films at Ambient Pressure

    Hu, X.; Qiu, W.; Chen, C.-Q.; Luo, Z.; Yao, D.-X. Elec- tronic Structures and Multi-Orbital Models of La 3Ni2O7 Thin Films at Ambient Pressure. Commun Phys 2025, 8 (1), 506

    2025

  15. [15]

    K.; Gong, R.; Wu, Y.; Kang, M.; Parzyck, C

    Gupta, N. K.; Gong, R.; Wu, Y.; Kang, M.; Parzyck, C. T.; Gregory, B. Z.; Costa, N.; Sutarto, R.; Sarker, S.; Singer, A.; Schlom, D. G.; Shen, K. M.; Hawthorn, D. G. Anisotropic Spin Stripe Domains in Bilayer La3Ni2O7. Nat Commun 2025, 16 (1), 6560

    2025

  16. [16]

    Pressure-Enhanced Spin-Density-Wave Transition in Double-Layer Nickelate La3Ni2O7

    Zhao, D.; Zhou, Y.; Huo, M.; Wang, Y.; Nie, L.; Yang, Y.; Ying, J.; Wang, M.; Wu, T.; Chen, X. Pressure-Enhanced Spin-Density-Wave Transition in Double-Layer Nickelate La3Ni2O7. Science Bulletin 2025, 70 (8), 1239–1245

    2025

  17. [17]

    J.; Gawryluk, D

    Khasanov, R.; Hicken, T. J.; Gawryluk, D. J.; Sazgari, V.; Plokhikh, I.; Sorel, L. P.; Bartkowiak, M.; B¨ otzel, S.; Lechermann, F.; Eremin, I. M.; Luetkens, H.; Guguchia, Z. Pressure-Enhanced Splitting of Density Wave Transi- tions in La 3Ni2O7–δ . Nat. Phys. 2025, 21 (3), 430–436

    2025

  18. [18]

    Electronic and Magnetic Excitations in La 3Ni2O7

    Chen, X.; Choi, J.; Jiang, Z.; Mei, J.; Jiang, K.; Li, J.; Agrestini, S.; Garcia-Fernandez, M.; Sun, H.; Huang, X.; Shen, D.; Wang, M.; Hu, J.; Lu, Y.; Zhou, K.-J.; Feng, D. Electronic and Magnetic Excitations in La 3Ni2O7. Nat Commun 2024, 15 (1), 9597

    2024

  19. [19]

    Evidence of Spin Density Waves in La 3Ni2O7−δ

    Chen, K.; Liu, X.; Jiao, J.; Zou, M.; Jiang, C.; Li, X.; Luo, Y.; Wu, Q.; Zhang, N.; Guo, Y.; Shu, L. Evidence of Spin Density Waves in La 3Ni2O7−δ. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2024, 132 (25), 256503

    2024

  20. [20]

    Spin Density Wave Anomaly at 140 K in the Ternary Iron Arsenide BaFe 2As2

    Rotter, M.; Tegel, M.; Schellenberg, I.; Hermes, W.; P¨ ottgen, R.; Johrendt, D. Spin Density Wave Anomaly at 140 K in the Ternary Iron Arsenide BaFe 2As2. Phys. Rev. B 2008, 78 (2), 020503

    2008

  21. [21]

    V.; Oswald, S.; Iida, K.; H¨ uhne, R.; H¨ anisch, J.; Hoffmann, M.; Kurth, F.; Schultz, L.; Holzapfel, B

    Engelmann, J.; Grinenko, V.; Chekhonin, P.; Skrotzki, W.; Efremov, D. V.; Oswald, S.; Iida, K.; H¨ uhne, R.; H¨ anisch, J.; Hoffmann, M.; Kurth, F.; Schultz, L.; Holzapfel, B. Strain Induced Superconductivity in the Parent Compound BaFe2As2. Nat Commun 2013, 4 (1), 2877

    2013

  22. [22]

    D.; Lacerda, A

    Christianson, A. D.; Lacerda, A. H.; Hundley, M. F.; Pagliuso, P. G.; Sarrao, J. L. Magnetotransport of CeRhIn5. Phys. Rev. B 2002, 66 (5), 054410

    2002

  23. [23]

    N.; Choi, W

    Kim, J.; Lee, H.; Lee, S.; Park, S.; Park, T.; Cho, Y.; Lee, H.; Kang, W. N.; Choi, W. S. Synthesis of Heavy Fermion CeCoIn5 Thin Film via Pulsed Laser Deposition. Current Applied Physics 2019, 19 (12), 1338–1342

    2019

  24. [24]

    Strain-Mediated Phase Crossover in Ruddlesden–Popper Nickelates

    Cui, T.; Choi, S.; Lin, T.; Liu, C.; Wang, G.; Wang, N.; Chen, S.; Hong, H.; Rong, D.; Wang, Q.; Jin, Q.; Wang, J.-O.; Gu, L.; Ge, C.; Wang, C.; Cheng, J.-G.; Zhang, Q.; Si, L.; Jin, K.; Guo, E.-J. Strain-Mediated Phase Crossover in Ruddlesden–Popper Nickelates. Com- mun Mater 2024, 5 (1), 32

    2024

  25. [25]

    High-Temperature Superconductivity with Zero Resis- tance and Strange-Metal Behaviour in La3Ni2O7−δ

    Zhang, Y.; Su, D.; Huang, Y.; Shan, Z.; Sun, H.; Huo, M.; Ye, K.; Zhang, J.; Yang, Z.; Xu, Y.; Su, Y.; Li, R.; Smidman, M.; Wang, M.; Jiao, L.; Yuan, H. High-Temperature Superconductivity with Zero Resis- tance and Strange-Metal Behaviour in La3Ni2O7−δ. Nat. Phys. 2024, 20 (8), 1269–1273

    2024

  26. [26]

    arXiv:2508.17668

    Onari S.; Inoue D.; Tazai R.; Yamakawa Y.; Kontani H.; Non-Fermi-liquid transport phenomena in bilayer nicke- lates: Impact of quasi-quantum metric. arXiv:2508.17668

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  27. [27]

    Y.; Osada, M.; Goodge, B

    Lee, K.; Wang, B. Y.; Osada, M.; Goodge, B. H.; Wang, T. C.; Lee, Y.; Harvey, S.; Kim, W. J.; Yu, Y.; Murthy, C.; Raghu, S.; Kourkoutis, L. F.; Hwang, H. Y. Linear-in- Temperature Resistivity for Optimally Superconducting (Nd,Sr)NiO2. Nature 2023, 619 (7969), 288–292

    2023

  28. [28]

    Strain-Engineered Peierls Instability in Layered Per- ovskite La3Ni2O7 from First Principles

    Mochizuki, Y.; Akamatsu, H.; Kumagai, Y.; Oba, F. Strain-Engineered Peierls Instability in Layered Per- ovskite La3Ni2O7 from First Principles. Phys. Rev. Ma- terials 2018, 2 (12), 125001

    2018

  29. [29]

    Stewart, G. R. Non-Fermi-Liquid Behavior ind- andf -Electron Metals. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2001, 73 (4), 797–855

    2001

  30. [30]

    Y.; Lee, K.; Harvey, S

    Li, D.; Wang, B. Y.; Lee, K.; Harvey, S. P.; Osada, M.; Goodge, B. H.; Kourkoutis, L. F.; Hwang, H. Y. Super- conducting Dome in Nd1−xSrxNiO2 Infinite Layer Films. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2020, 125 (2), 027001

    2020

  31. [31]

    N.; Yang, M

    Wang, N. N.; Yang, M. W.; Yang, Z.; Chen, K. Y.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, Q. H.; Zhu, Z. H.; Uwatoko, Y.; Gu, L.; Dong, X. L.; Sun, J. P.; Jin, K. J.; Cheng, J.-G. Pressure-Induced Monotonic Enhancement of Tc to over 30 K in Superconducting Pr 0.82Sr0.18NiO2 Thin Films. Nat Commun 2022, 13 (1), 4367

    2022

  32. [32]

    C. M. Duffy; S. J. Tu; Q. H. Chen; J. S. Zhang; A. Cuoghi; R. D. H. Hinlopen; T. Sarkar; R. L. Greene; K. Jin; N. E. Hussey; Evidence for spin-fluctuation- mediated superconductivity in electron-doped cuprates, arXiv:2502.13612

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  33. [33]

    Anomalous Transport Phenomena in Fermi Liquids with Strong Magnetic Fluctuations

    Kontani, H. Anomalous Transport Phenomena in Fermi Liquids with Strong Magnetic Fluctuations. Rep. Prog. Phys. 2008, 71 (2), 026501

    2008

  34. [34]

    K.; Hosoi, S.; Culo, M.; Kasahara, S.; Sato, Y.; Matsuura, K.; Mizukami, Y.; Berben, M.; Hussey, N

    Huang, W. K.; Hosoi, S.; Culo, M.; Kasahara, S.; Sato, Y.; Matsuura, K.; Mizukami, Y.; Berben, M.; Hussey, N. E.; Kontani, H.; Shibauchi, T.; Matsuda, Y. Non- Fermi Liquid Transport in the Vicinity of the Nematic Quantum Critical Point of Superconducting FeSe 1−xSx. Phys. Rev. Research 2020, 2 (3), 033367

    2020

  35. [35]

    Non-Fermi-Liquid Trans- port Phenomena in Infinite-Layer Nickelates

    Hiragami, S.; Onari, S. Non-Fermi-Liquid Trans- port Phenomena in Infinite-Layer Nickelates. arXiv:2410.01412

    arXiv