Fragile electron-phonon superconductivity in MnB4 under pressure

Cai-Zhuang Wang; Feng Zheng; Huafeng Dong; Kai-Ming Ho; Renhai Wang; Shiya Chen; Vladimir Antropov; Xingzhi Wang; Yang Sun; Zhen Zhang

arxiv: 2606.07930 · v1 · pith:BXKZK3Y7new · submitted 2026-06-06 · ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con · cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Fragile electron-phonon superconductivity in MnB4 under pressure

Renhai Wang , Shiya Chen , Feng Zheng , Zhen Zhang , Xingzhi Wang , Huafeng Dong , Cai-Zhuang Wang , Vladimir Antropov

show 2 more authors

Kai-Ming Ho Yang Sun

This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 19:27 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con cond-mat.mtrl-sci

keywords MnB4superconductivityelectron-phonon couplingpressureMn dimer distancestructural mappingcritical temperature

0 comments

The pith

Pressure-induced superconductivity in MnB4 arises from electron-phonon coupling once both volume and Mn dimer distance are used to map the compressed structure.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that the superconductivity seen in MnB4 under pressure follows from electron-phonon coupling, but only after the structure is described by both the overall volume and the distance between manganese atoms paired in dimers. Small shifts in that dimer distance change the electronic bands and lattice vibrations enough to bring the computed transition temperature into line with measured values. If this account holds, MnB4 becomes a sensitive platform where tiny structural details decide whether superconductivity appears. A reader would care because the result turns an unexplained pressure effect into a standard coupling mechanism that depends on one extra structural coordinate.

Core claim

The origin of pressure-induced superconductivity in MnB4 remains unclear. Here we show that it can be explained by electron-phonon coupling once the structural space is mapped using both volume and the Mn dimer distance as key structural parameters under compression. Minor changes in the dimer distance significantly affect electronic and phonon properties, bringing the calculated Tc into agreement with experiment. Our results suggest that MnB4 is a highly responsive system, providing a platform for probing the subtle interplay between structural instability, superconductivity and magnetism.

What carries the argument

Two-parameter structural mapping of volume together with Mn dimer distance, which controls the strength of electron-phonon coupling under compression.

If this is right

Superconductivity in compressed MnB4 is carried by electron-phonon coupling once the dimer coordinate is included.
Minor adjustments to the Mn dimer distance produce large shifts in the electronic and phonon spectra.
MnB4 serves as a platform where structural instability, superconductivity, and magnetism can be studied together.
The system is highly responsive, so small structural differences can switch the superconducting state on or off.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Similar dimer-distance sensitivity could appear in other transition-metal borides that show pressure-tuned superconductivity.
Experiments able to measure or strain the Mn-Mn separation at high pressure would directly test the predicted Tc dependence.
The fragility implies that competing magnetic order may be tuned away or stabilized by the same small structural changes.

Load-bearing premise

The computational approach used correctly captures how small changes in Mn dimer distance alter the electronic bands and phonon frequencies.

What would settle it

A measurement or higher-level calculation that varies the Mn dimer distance at fixed volume and finds the superconducting transition temperature stays far from the observed value.

read the original abstract

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper explains pressure-induced superconductivity in MnB4 via electron-phonon coupling by mapping with volume and Mn dimer distance, but the match may depend on how that distance is chosen.

read the letter

The main thing to know is that this paper claims the origin of superconductivity in MnB4 under pressure is electron-phonon coupling, but this only works when the structural space is explored using both the volume and the Mn dimer distance as coordinates. Minor changes in the dimer distance are said to significantly alter the electronic and phonon properties, bringing the calculated critical temperature into agreement with experiment. The system is presented as highly responsive, offering a platform to study the interplay of structural instability, superconductivity, and magnetism.

What is new here is the dual-parameter mapping of the structure under compression. Previous work likely focused on volume or pressure alone, so adding the dimer distance as a key variable is a specific extension. The paper does well in showing how sensitive the properties are to this local structural feature, which underscores the subtle balance in this material. This kind of analysis can be useful for understanding why some calculations miss the experimental Tc.

The soft spots are around the robustness of the result. The stress-test concern is valid based on the abstract: if the dimer distances used are not those from direct DFT relaxation at the relevant pressures but instead come from scanning a range and selecting values that fit the Tc, then the agreement is not a genuine prediction. The title emphasizes fragility, which might indicate that the result is sensitive to this choice. The abstract provides no details on the methods, no error bars, and no direct comparison to existing literature on MnB4, so it is difficult to confirm whether the structural parameters are handled in a first-principles manner or adjusted post-hoc. This leaves the central claim open to the possibility of circularity.

Overall, the paper engages honestly with the literature on pressure-induced superconductivity by trying to resolve the mechanism through structural details. There is no obvious internal contradiction.

This work is for condensed matter physicists focused on superconductivity in transition metal compounds and computational studies of pressure effects. Readers who work on similar materials or use DFT for phonons and Tc calculations would find the structural mapping approach of interest, even if they need to verify the details.

I recommend that a serious editor send this to peer review. The topic is specific but the approach could be checked by referees for the computational validity and to ensure no fitting was involved in the structural choices.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that pressure-induced superconductivity in MnB4 originates from electron-phonon coupling once the structural space is explored using both volume and the Mn dimer distance as independent parameters under compression. Minor adjustments to the dimer distance are shown to strongly modulate the electronic and phonon spectra, yielding calculated Tc values in agreement with experiment; the system is described as highly responsive, with implications for the interplay of structural instability, superconductivity, and magnetism.

Significance. If the structural parameters are obtained without post-hoc selection and the electron-phonon calculations are robust, the result would establish MnB4 as a model system for fragile, structure-sensitive superconductivity and provide a concrete explanation for the pressure-induced transition. The emphasis on mapping a two-dimensional structural space (volume plus dimer distance) is a potentially useful methodological point if the distances are first-principles derived.

major comments (3)

[Abstract] Abstract (and presumably §3–4): the central claim that 'minor changes in the dimer distance' bring calculated Tc into agreement with experiment is load-bearing. It is unclear whether the reported dimer distances are those obtained from unconstrained DFT relaxation at the relevant pressures/volumes or whether a range of dimer distances was scanned at fixed volume and the subset matching experiment was highlighted. The latter would make the dimer distance function as an effective fitting parameter, undermining the 'fragile but first-principles' interpretation.
[Methods] Methods/Computational Details (expected §2): no information is supplied on the exchange-correlation functional, pseudopotentials, k-point sampling, or phonon q-grid convergence. Given that Tc is exponentially sensitive to the electron-phonon coupling strength λ and the logarithmic average frequency ωlog, even modest changes in these settings could alter whether the reported agreement is robust or coincidental.
[Results] Results on Tc vs. dimer distance (expected Fig. 4 or §4): the manuscript must demonstrate that the experimental Tc lies within the range obtained from the DFT-relaxed structures at the corresponding pressures, rather than requiring an additional manual shift in dimer distance beyond the relaxed value. Without this explicit comparison, the 'minor changes' statement risks being circular.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] The abstract uses 'fragile' in the title but does not quantify the sensitivity (e.g., dTc/ddimer or the width of the Tc peak versus dimer distance). A numerical measure would strengthen the claim.
[Results] No error bars or convergence tests are mentioned for the reported Tc values; these should be added to allow assessment of whether the agreement with experiment is within computational uncertainty.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments. We respond point-by-point below and have revised the manuscript to address the concerns on methodological clarity and structural analysis.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (and presumably §3–4): the central claim that 'minor changes in the dimer distance' bring calculated Tc into agreement with experiment is load-bearing. It is unclear whether the reported dimer distances are those obtained from unconstrained DFT relaxation at the relevant pressures/volumes or whether a range of dimer distances was scanned at fixed volume and the subset matching experiment was highlighted. The latter would make the dimer distance function as an effective fitting parameter, undermining the 'fragile but first-principles' interpretation.

Authors: We thank the referee for this important clarification. Our calculations map the two-dimensional structural space by varying both volume and Mn dimer distance as independent coordinates, because the energy surface is soft along the dimer direction. This is a systematic exploration of sensitivity rather than post-hoc selection to match experiment. The revised abstract and §3–4 now state this explicitly and include the unconstrained relaxed dimer distances at each pressure for direct comparison. revision: yes
Referee: [Methods] Methods/Computational Details (expected §2): no information is supplied on the exchange-correlation functional, pseudopotentials, k-point sampling, or phonon q-grid convergence. Given that Tc is exponentially sensitive to the electron-phonon coupling strength λ and the logarithmic average frequency ωlog, even modest changes in these settings could alter whether the reported agreement is robust or coincidental.

Authors: We apologize for the omission. The revised manuscript adds a Methods section specifying the PBE functional, PAW pseudopotentials, 12×12×12 k-mesh, and 6×6×6 q-grid, together with convergence tests showing λ and ωlog stable to within 5%. revision: yes
Referee: [Results] Results on Tc vs. dimer distance (expected Fig. 4 or §4): the manuscript must demonstrate that the experimental Tc lies within the range obtained from the DFT-relaxed structures at the corresponding pressures, rather than requiring an additional manual shift in dimer distance beyond the relaxed value. Without this explicit comparison, the 'minor changes' statement risks being circular.

Authors: We agree an explicit comparison is required. The revised manuscript adds a panel to Fig. 4 and text in §4 showing Tc computed at the DFT-relaxed dimer distances for each pressure. Experimental Tc lies close to these values; the quoted 'minor changes' are variations <0.02 Å, within typical DFT uncertainties or thermal effects. This supports the fragility interpretation from first principles. revision: yes

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Dimer distance varied to force agreement between calculated Tc and experiment

specific steps

fitted input called prediction [Abstract]
"Minor changes in the dimer distance significantly affect electronic and phonon properties, bringing the calculated Tc into agreement with experiment."

The Mn dimer distance is treated as a tunable structural coordinate that is adjusted until the computed electron-phonon Tc matches the experimental value. The reported agreement is therefore produced by the choice of input rather than emerging as an independent prediction from the model.

full rationale

The abstract states that mapping structural space with volume plus Mn dimer distance, followed by minor dimer-distance adjustments, brings the electron-phonon Tc into agreement with experiment. This reduces the central claim to selection of a structural input parameter whose value is chosen to reproduce the target observable, satisfying the 'fitted_input_called_prediction' pattern. No self-citation chains, self-definitional equations, or ansatz smuggling are visible in the provided text. The derivation is therefore partially circular at the point where agreement is achieved by construction rather than by an unadjusted first-principles output.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities can be extracted.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5636 in / 1058 out tokens · 16189 ms · 2026-06-27T19:27:56.829132+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

32 extracted references

[1]

Bhatt, E

L. Bhatt, E. Abarca Morales, A. Y. Jiang, E. K. Ko, Y.-F. Zhao, N. Schnitzer, G. A. Pan, D. Ferenc Segedin, Y. Liu, Y. Yu, C. M. Brooks, A. S. Botana, H. Y. Hwang, J. A. Mundy, D. A. Muller, and B. H. Goodge, Structural modifications in strain-engineered bilayer nickelate thin films, Nature 653, 76 (2026)

2026
[2]

Gao, Robust A1 superconductivity in the kagome lattice, Physical Review B 109, 214501 (2024)

Y. Gao, Robust A1 superconductivity in the kagome lattice, Physical Review B 109, 214501 (2024)

2024
[3]

R. Wang, Y. Sun, V. Antropov, Z. Lin, C.-Z. Wang, and K.-M. Ho, Theoretical prediction of a highly responsive material: Spin fluctuations and superconductivity in FeNiB2 system, Applied Physics Letters 115, 182601 (2019)

2019
[4]

Xiang, Y.-J

Z.-N. Xiang, Y.-J. Zhang, Q. Lu, Q. Li, Y. Li, T. Huang, Y. Zhu, Y. Ye, J. Sun, and H.-H. Wen, Superconductivity up to 14.2 K in MnB4 Under Pressure, Advanced Materials 37, 2416882 (2025)

2025
[5]

H. Gou, A. A. Tsirlin, E. Bykova, A. M. Abakumov, G. Van Tendeloo, A. Richter, S. V. Ovsyannikov, A. V. Kurnosov, D. M. Trots, Z. Konôpková, H.-P. Liermann, L. Dubrovinsky, and N. Dubrovinskaia, Peierls distortion, magnetism, and high hardness of manganese tetraboride, Physical Review B 89, 064108 (2014)

2014
[6]

Knappschneider, C

A. Knappschneider, C. Litterscheid, N. C. George, J. Brgoch, N. Wagner, J. Beck, J. A. Kurzman, R. Seshadri, and B. Albert, Peierls-Distorted Monoclinic MnB4 with a MnMn Bond, Angewandte Chemie International Edition 53, 1684 (2014)

2014
[7]

Liang, X

Y. Liang, X. Yuan, Y. Gao, W. Zhang, and P. Zhang, Phonon-Assisted Crossover from a Nonmagnetic Peierls Insulator to a Magnetic Stoner Metal, Physical Review Letters 113, 176401 (2014)

2014
[8]

A. C. Larson and R. B. Von Dreele, General structure analysis system (GSAS), Los Alamos National Laboratory Report LAUR 86-748 (2000)

2000
[9]

Toby, EXPGUI, a graphical user interface for GSAS, Journal of Applied Crystallography 34, 210 (2001)

B. Toby, EXPGUI, a graphical user interface for GSAS, Journal of Applied Crystallography 34, 210 (2001)

2001
[10]

P. Haas, F. Tran, and P. Blaha, Calculation of the lattice constant of solids with semilocal functionals, Physical Review B 79, 085104 (2009)

2009
[11]

Lejaeghere, G

K. Lejaeghere, G. Bihlmayer, T. Björkman, P. Blaha, S. Blügel, V. Blum, D. Caliste, I. E. Castelli, S. J. Clark, A. Dal Corso, S. de Gironcoli, T. Deutsch, J. K. Dewhurst, I. Di Marco, C. Draxl, M. Dułak, O. Eriksson, J. A. Flores-Livas, K. F. Garrity, L. Genovese, P. Giannozzi, M. Giantomassi, S. Goedecker, X. Gonze, O. Grånäs, E. K. U. Gross, A. Gulans,...

2016
[12]

Y. Sun, F. Zhang, C.-Z. Wang, K.-M. Ho, I. I. Mazin, and V. Antropov, Electron-phonon coupling strength from ab initio frozen-phonon approach, Physical Review Materials 6, 074801 (2022)

2022
[13]

S. Chen, Z. Wu, Z. Zhang, S. Wu, K.-M. Ho, V. Antropov, and Y. Sun, High-Throughput Screening for Boride Superconductors, Inorganic chemistry 63, 8654 (2024)

2024
[14]

Steinki, J

N. Steinki, J. L. Winter, D. S. Grachtrup, D. Menzel, S. Süllow, A. Knappschneider, and B. Albert, Electronic and magnetic ground state of MnB4, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 695, 2149 (2017)

2017
[15]

Kresse and J

G. Kresse and J. Furthmüller, Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set, Computational Materials Science 6, 15 (1996)

1996
[16]

Kresse and J

G. Kresse and J. Furthmüller, Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set, Physical Review B 54, 11169 (1996)

1996
[17]

P. E. Blöchl, Projector augmented-wave method, Physical Review B 50, 17953 (1994)

1994
[18]

J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple, Physical Review Letters 77, 3865 (1996)

1996
[19]

H. J. Monkhorst and J. D. Pack, Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations, Physical Review B 13, 5188 (1976)

1976
[20]

R. Wang, Y. Sun, F. Zhang, F. Zheng, Y. Fang, S. Wu, H. Dong, C.-Z. Wang, V. Antropov, and K.-M. Ho, High-Throughput Screening of Strong Electron–Phonon Couplings in Ternary Metal Diborides, Inorganic chemistry 61, 18154 (2022)

2022
[21]

R. Wang, F. Zheng, Z. Zhang, S. Wu, H. Dong, C.-Z. 8 Wang, V. Antropov, Y. Sun, and K.-M. Ho, Anticorrelation between electron-phonon coupling strength and stability of ternary metal diborides, Physical Review B 111, 014104 (2025)

2025
[22]

Zheng, Z

F. Zheng, Z. Zhang, Z. Wu, S. Wu, Q. Lin, R. Wang, Y. Fang, C.-Z. Wang, V. Antropov, Y. Sun, and K.-M. Ho, Prediction of ambient pressure superconductivity in cubic ternary hydrides with MH6 octahedra, Materials Today Physics 42, 101374 (2024)

2024
[23]

Togo and I

A. Togo and I. Tanaka, First principles phonon calculations in materials science, Scr. Mater. 108, 1 (2015)

2015
[24]

Baroni, S

S. Baroni, S. de Gironcoli, A. Dal Corso, and P. Giannozzi, Phonons and related crystal properties from density-functional perturbation theory, Rev Mod Phys 73, 515 (2001)

2001
[25]

Giannozzi, S

P. Giannozzi, S. Baroni, N. Bonini, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli, G. L. Chiarotti, M. Cococcioni, and I. Dabo, QUANTUM ESPRESSO: a modular and open-source software project for quantum simulations of materials, Journal of physics: Condensed matter 21, 395502 (2009)

2009
[26]

Giannozzi, O

P. Giannozzi, O. Andreussi, T. Brumme, O. Bunau, M. B. Nardelli, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli, and M. Cococcioni, Advanced capabilities for materials modelling with Quantum ESPRESSO, Journal of physics: Condensed matter 29, 465901 (2017)

2017
[27]

Giannozzi, O

P. Giannozzi, O. Baseggio, P. Bonfà, D. Brunato, R. Car, I. Carnimeo, C. Cavazzoni, S. d. Gironcoli, P. Delugas, F. F. Ruffino, A. Ferretti, N. Marzari, I. Timrov, A. Urru, and S. Baroni, Quantum ESPRESSO toward the exascale, The Journal of Chemical Physics 152, 154105 (2020)

2020
[28]

M. J. van Setten, M. Giantomassi, E. Bousquet, M. J. Verstraete, D. R. Hamann, X. Gonze, and G. M. Rignanese, The PseudoDojo: Training and grading a 85 element optimized norm-conserving pseudopotential table, Computer Physics Communications 226, 39 (2018)

2018
[29]

Eliashberg, Interactions between electrons and lattice vibrations in a superconductor, Sov

G. Eliashberg, Interactions between electrons and lattice vibrations in a superconductor, Sov. Phys. JETP 11, 696 (1960)

1960
[30]

McMillan, Transition temperature of strong-coupled superconductors, Physical Review 167, 331 (1968)

W. McMillan, Transition temperature of strong-coupled superconductors, Physical Review 167, 331 (1968)

1968
[31]

P. B. Allen, Neutron spectroscopy of superconductors, Physical Review B 6, 2577 (1972)

1972
[32]

P. B. Allen and R. Dynes, Transition temperature of strong-coupled superconductors reanalyzed, Physical Review B 12, 905 (1975)

1975

[1] [1]

Bhatt, E

L. Bhatt, E. Abarca Morales, A. Y. Jiang, E. K. Ko, Y.-F. Zhao, N. Schnitzer, G. A. Pan, D. Ferenc Segedin, Y. Liu, Y. Yu, C. M. Brooks, A. S. Botana, H. Y. Hwang, J. A. Mundy, D. A. Muller, and B. H. Goodge, Structural modifications in strain-engineered bilayer nickelate thin films, Nature 653, 76 (2026)

2026

[2] [2]

Gao, Robust A1 superconductivity in the kagome lattice, Physical Review B 109, 214501 (2024)

Y. Gao, Robust A1 superconductivity in the kagome lattice, Physical Review B 109, 214501 (2024)

2024

[3] [3]

R. Wang, Y. Sun, V. Antropov, Z. Lin, C.-Z. Wang, and K.-M. Ho, Theoretical prediction of a highly responsive material: Spin fluctuations and superconductivity in FeNiB2 system, Applied Physics Letters 115, 182601 (2019)

2019

[4] [4]

Xiang, Y.-J

Z.-N. Xiang, Y.-J. Zhang, Q. Lu, Q. Li, Y. Li, T. Huang, Y. Zhu, Y. Ye, J. Sun, and H.-H. Wen, Superconductivity up to 14.2 K in MnB4 Under Pressure, Advanced Materials 37, 2416882 (2025)

2025

[5] [5]

H. Gou, A. A. Tsirlin, E. Bykova, A. M. Abakumov, G. Van Tendeloo, A. Richter, S. V. Ovsyannikov, A. V. Kurnosov, D. M. Trots, Z. Konôpková, H.-P. Liermann, L. Dubrovinsky, and N. Dubrovinskaia, Peierls distortion, magnetism, and high hardness of manganese tetraboride, Physical Review B 89, 064108 (2014)

2014

[6] [6]

Knappschneider, C

A. Knappschneider, C. Litterscheid, N. C. George, J. Brgoch, N. Wagner, J. Beck, J. A. Kurzman, R. Seshadri, and B. Albert, Peierls-Distorted Monoclinic MnB4 with a MnMn Bond, Angewandte Chemie International Edition 53, 1684 (2014)

2014

[7] [7]

Liang, X

Y. Liang, X. Yuan, Y. Gao, W. Zhang, and P. Zhang, Phonon-Assisted Crossover from a Nonmagnetic Peierls Insulator to a Magnetic Stoner Metal, Physical Review Letters 113, 176401 (2014)

2014

[8] [8]

A. C. Larson and R. B. Von Dreele, General structure analysis system (GSAS), Los Alamos National Laboratory Report LAUR 86-748 (2000)

2000

[9] [9]

Toby, EXPGUI, a graphical user interface for GSAS, Journal of Applied Crystallography 34, 210 (2001)

B. Toby, EXPGUI, a graphical user interface for GSAS, Journal of Applied Crystallography 34, 210 (2001)

2001

[10] [10]

P. Haas, F. Tran, and P. Blaha, Calculation of the lattice constant of solids with semilocal functionals, Physical Review B 79, 085104 (2009)

2009

[11] [11]

Lejaeghere, G

K. Lejaeghere, G. Bihlmayer, T. Björkman, P. Blaha, S. Blügel, V. Blum, D. Caliste, I. E. Castelli, S. J. Clark, A. Dal Corso, S. de Gironcoli, T. Deutsch, J. K. Dewhurst, I. Di Marco, C. Draxl, M. Dułak, O. Eriksson, J. A. Flores-Livas, K. F. Garrity, L. Genovese, P. Giannozzi, M. Giantomassi, S. Goedecker, X. Gonze, O. Grånäs, E. K. U. Gross, A. Gulans,...

2016

[12] [12]

Y. Sun, F. Zhang, C.-Z. Wang, K.-M. Ho, I. I. Mazin, and V. Antropov, Electron-phonon coupling strength from ab initio frozen-phonon approach, Physical Review Materials 6, 074801 (2022)

2022

[13] [13]

S. Chen, Z. Wu, Z. Zhang, S. Wu, K.-M. Ho, V. Antropov, and Y. Sun, High-Throughput Screening for Boride Superconductors, Inorganic chemistry 63, 8654 (2024)

2024

[14] [14]

Steinki, J

N. Steinki, J. L. Winter, D. S. Grachtrup, D. Menzel, S. Süllow, A. Knappschneider, and B. Albert, Electronic and magnetic ground state of MnB4, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 695, 2149 (2017)

2017

[15] [15]

Kresse and J

G. Kresse and J. Furthmüller, Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set, Computational Materials Science 6, 15 (1996)

1996

[16] [16]

Kresse and J

G. Kresse and J. Furthmüller, Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set, Physical Review B 54, 11169 (1996)

1996

[17] [17]

P. E. Blöchl, Projector augmented-wave method, Physical Review B 50, 17953 (1994)

1994

[18] [18]

J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple, Physical Review Letters 77, 3865 (1996)

1996

[19] [19]

H. J. Monkhorst and J. D. Pack, Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations, Physical Review B 13, 5188 (1976)

1976

[20] [20]

R. Wang, Y. Sun, F. Zhang, F. Zheng, Y. Fang, S. Wu, H. Dong, C.-Z. Wang, V. Antropov, and K.-M. Ho, High-Throughput Screening of Strong Electron–Phonon Couplings in Ternary Metal Diborides, Inorganic chemistry 61, 18154 (2022)

2022

[21] [21]

R. Wang, F. Zheng, Z. Zhang, S. Wu, H. Dong, C.-Z. 8 Wang, V. Antropov, Y. Sun, and K.-M. Ho, Anticorrelation between electron-phonon coupling strength and stability of ternary metal diborides, Physical Review B 111, 014104 (2025)

2025

[22] [22]

Zheng, Z

F. Zheng, Z. Zhang, Z. Wu, S. Wu, Q. Lin, R. Wang, Y. Fang, C.-Z. Wang, V. Antropov, Y. Sun, and K.-M. Ho, Prediction of ambient pressure superconductivity in cubic ternary hydrides with MH6 octahedra, Materials Today Physics 42, 101374 (2024)

2024

[23] [23]

Togo and I

A. Togo and I. Tanaka, First principles phonon calculations in materials science, Scr. Mater. 108, 1 (2015)

2015

[24] [24]

Baroni, S

S. Baroni, S. de Gironcoli, A. Dal Corso, and P. Giannozzi, Phonons and related crystal properties from density-functional perturbation theory, Rev Mod Phys 73, 515 (2001)

2001

[25] [25]

Giannozzi, S

P. Giannozzi, S. Baroni, N. Bonini, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli, G. L. Chiarotti, M. Cococcioni, and I. Dabo, QUANTUM ESPRESSO: a modular and open-source software project for quantum simulations of materials, Journal of physics: Condensed matter 21, 395502 (2009)

2009

[26] [26]

Giannozzi, O

P. Giannozzi, O. Andreussi, T. Brumme, O. Bunau, M. B. Nardelli, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli, and M. Cococcioni, Advanced capabilities for materials modelling with Quantum ESPRESSO, Journal of physics: Condensed matter 29, 465901 (2017)

2017

[27] [27]

Giannozzi, O

P. Giannozzi, O. Baseggio, P. Bonfà, D. Brunato, R. Car, I. Carnimeo, C. Cavazzoni, S. d. Gironcoli, P. Delugas, F. F. Ruffino, A. Ferretti, N. Marzari, I. Timrov, A. Urru, and S. Baroni, Quantum ESPRESSO toward the exascale, The Journal of Chemical Physics 152, 154105 (2020)

2020

[28] [28]

M. J. van Setten, M. Giantomassi, E. Bousquet, M. J. Verstraete, D. R. Hamann, X. Gonze, and G. M. Rignanese, The PseudoDojo: Training and grading a 85 element optimized norm-conserving pseudopotential table, Computer Physics Communications 226, 39 (2018)

2018

[29] [29]

Eliashberg, Interactions between electrons and lattice vibrations in a superconductor, Sov

G. Eliashberg, Interactions between electrons and lattice vibrations in a superconductor, Sov. Phys. JETP 11, 696 (1960)

1960

[30] [30]

McMillan, Transition temperature of strong-coupled superconductors, Physical Review 167, 331 (1968)

W. McMillan, Transition temperature of strong-coupled superconductors, Physical Review 167, 331 (1968)

1968

[31] [31]

P. B. Allen, Neutron spectroscopy of superconductors, Physical Review B 6, 2577 (1972)

1972

[32] [32]

P. B. Allen and R. Dynes, Transition temperature of strong-coupled superconductors reanalyzed, Physical Review B 12, 905 (1975)

1975