pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.08099 · v1 · pith:2T2TM5VXnew · submitted 2026-06-06 · 💻 cs.RO

Cybernetic Android Avatar "Yui": System Integration, Field Deployment, and Evaluation

Kaoruko Shinkawa , Mizuki Nakajima , Taisei Mogi , Yoshihiro Nakata This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 19:38 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.RO
keywords android avatarteleoperationhuman-robot interactionfield deploymentcybernetic avatarremote communicationsocial roboticsexpo deployment
0
0 comments X

The pith

The Yui full-body android avatar shows operational feasibility after 1131 hours of Expo deployment and positive user ratings for co-presence and emotion transmission.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper introduces the Yui cybernetic android avatar, a full-body robotic system that merges immersive teleoperation with human-like facial expressions, gaze, arm motion, and mobility to support remote social interactions. The authors test the system in three real-world settings, most notably a prolonged public exhibition at Expo 2025 where two units accumulated roughly 1131 hours of operation. Operators and interlocutors gave favorable reports on the sense of shared presence, the avatar's human likeness, and its ability to convey emotions and intentions, while noting areas for better motion precision. A reader would care because the work supplies concrete field data on whether such avatars can move beyond lab demonstrations into sustained public and educational use.

Core claim

The Yui system combines a 55-degree-of-freedom full-body mechanism, an android head with facial and gaze control, upper-body and hand actuation, and a mobile platform, which can be driven either through a head-mounted-display immersive interface or a simpler webcam desktop interface. Across the Expo 2025 exhibition, a remote elementary-school exchange, and a public interaction study, the deployments produced evidence of operational feasibility alongside maintenance demands, with both operators and interlocutors reporting positive impressions of co-presence and willingness to use the system, and interlocutors rating it highly for human likeness and transmission of emotions and intentions.

What carries the argument

The Yui avatar's 55-DOF full-body mechanism integrated with dual-mode teleoperation interfaces that enable both immersive control and human-like social signaling.

If this is right

  • The system can sustain continuous public operation for hundreds of hours with manageable maintenance.
  • Both trained and general operators can produce interactions that interlocutors perceive as emotionally expressive.
  • Mobile full-body avatars can support remote educational exchanges between distant classrooms.
  • Design priorities should shift toward finer motion control once basic co-presence is achieved.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Maintenance logs from the 1131-hour run could reveal recurring failure modes that future hardware revisions must address.
  • Adding objective measures of conversation success, such as turn-taking latency, would allow direct comparison to video calls.
  • The same hardware platform could be tested in clinical or elder-care settings to check whether the reported willingness to use extends to those populations.

Load-bearing premise

That qualitative impressions collected from three deployments without controlled comparisons or statistical analysis of ratings are enough to establish general usability and feasibility.

What would settle it

A follow-up deployment in which quantitative measures show operator task-completion rates below 70 percent or interlocutor ratings of human likeness and co-presence fall below neutral on validated scales.

read the original abstract

Remote communication technologies have become widely used; however, supporting a sense of shared physical space and conveying rich non-verbal cues remain challenging in many social interaction scenarios. This study presents "Yui," a full-body cybernetic android avatar designed to integrate operator-side immersive teleoperation with interlocutor-side human-like social signaling. Yui combines a 55-degrees of freedom full-body mechanism with a previously developed android head, facial expression and gaze control, upper-body and arm motion, hand actuation, and a mobile platform. It can be operated through either the immersive mode using a head mounted display-based interface or desktop mode using a webcam-based interface. We evaluated the system through three real-world deployments: a long-term public exhibition at Expo 2025 in Osaka, Kansai, Japan; a remote educational exchange between elementary school students; and a public interaction study with general participants. During the Expo deployment, two units accumulated approximately 1131 h of operation, demonstrating both operational feasibility and maintenance challenges. In the public study, both operators and interlocutors reported positive impressions of co-presence and willingness to use the system. Interlocutors also rated the avatar positively in terms of human likeness and the transmission of emotions and intentions. The results indicate usability for general operators while suggesting room for improvement in precise controllability. These findings provide field-derived evidence and design implications for socially deployable full-body android avatars.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper presents the Yui full-body cybernetic android avatar system, which integrates a 55-DoF mechanism with an android head for immersive or desktop teleoperation, enabling remote social interactions with human-like non-verbal signaling. It describes three real-world deployments—an extended public exhibition at Expo 2025 (two units, ~1131 hours total), a remote elementary-school educational exchange, and a public interaction study—and reports operational feasibility alongside positive qualitative impressions from operators and interlocutors on co-presence, human likeness, emotion/intention transmission, and willingness to use, while noting limitations in precise controllability.

Significance. If the reported impressions can be supported by quantitative metrics and controlled analysis, the work would supply rare field-derived evidence on long-term operation and social usability of full-body android avatars, including maintenance challenges and design implications for public deployments. The scale of the Expo deployment constitutes a concrete strength relative to typical lab-only evaluations in the area.

major comments (3)
  1. [Evaluation and results sections] Evaluation and results sections: The central claims of operational feasibility and usability for general operators rest on qualitative impressions and the 1131-hour figure, yet no sample sizes, rating instruments, means, variances, success/error rates, task-completion metrics, or statistical tests are supplied; this leaves the inference vulnerable to novelty or selection effects and directly weakens the evidence for the usability conclusion.
  2. [Deployment descriptions (Expo 2025)] Deployment descriptions (Expo 2025): The feasibility claim cites accumulated operation time but provides no breakdown of uptime percentage, failure modes, maintenance interventions, or quantitative performance indicators across the three deployments, rendering the 'demonstrating both operational feasibility and maintenance challenges' statement difficult to evaluate.
  3. [Public interaction study] Public interaction study: Positive ratings on co-presence, human likeness, and emotion transmission are reported for interlocutors, but without the underlying scales, number of participants, or any comparison condition, the strength of these impressions relative to existing telepresence systems cannot be assessed.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and introduction] The abstract and introduction would benefit from explicit forward references to the specific quantitative or qualitative instruments used in each deployment.
  2. [System description figures] Figure captions and system diagrams should include DOF counts, sensor placements, and interface details to allow readers to map the described integration to the hardware.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback, which identifies opportunities to strengthen the presentation of evidence from our field deployments. We address each major comment below, indicating planned revisions where appropriate.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Evaluation and results sections] The central claims of operational feasibility and usability for general operators rest on qualitative impressions and the 1131-hour figure, yet no sample sizes, rating instruments, means, variances, success/error rates, task-completion metrics, or statistical tests are supplied; this leaves the inference vulnerable to novelty or selection effects and directly weakens the evidence for the usability conclusion.

    Authors: We agree that the evaluation relies on qualitative impressions from real-world deployments rather than controlled quantitative analysis. In revision we will add the sample sizes for operators and interlocutors in the public interaction study, describe the rating instruments (including any Likert-scale items for co-presence, human-likeness, and emotion transmission), and report available descriptive statistics such as means or ranges. No inferential statistical tests were performed because the study was exploratory; we will explicitly state this limitation and the exploratory nature of the work to contextualize the findings and mitigate concerns about selection effects. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Deployment descriptions (Expo 2025)] The feasibility claim cites accumulated operation time but provides no breakdown of uptime percentage, failure modes, maintenance interventions, or quantitative performance indicators across the three deployments, rendering the 'demonstrating both operational feasibility and maintenance challenges' statement difficult to evaluate.

    Authors: We acknowledge that additional operational metrics would improve evaluability of the feasibility claim. The revised manuscript will include a breakdown of the 1131 hours (e.g., estimated uptime percentages), descriptions of major failure modes encountered (such as actuator or sensor issues in the 55-DoF system), and summaries of maintenance interventions across the Expo deployment and the other two deployments where records permit. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Public interaction study] Positive ratings on co-presence, human likeness, and emotion transmission are reported for interlocutors, but without the underlying scales, number of participants, or any comparison condition, the strength of these impressions relative to existing telepresence systems cannot be assessed.

    Authors: We will revise the public interaction study section to specify the number of participants, the exact rating scales and instruments used, and to note explicitly that no comparison condition with other telepresence systems was included, as the study focused on gathering initial impressions of the novel Yui avatar in a public setting. This will allow readers to better gauge the reported impressions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: evaluation rests on independent field reports without derivations or self-referential modeling

full rationale

The paper contains no equations, derivations, fitted parameters, or predictive modeling steps. Its central claims rest on reported deployment hours (1131 h) and qualitative impressions from operators and interlocutors across three deployments. These are presented as direct empirical observations rather than outputs derived from any internal model or self-citation chain. No load-bearing step reduces to a prior result by the authors or by construction. The evaluation is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks of operational time and user feedback, warranting a score of 0.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is an engineering systems paper focused on hardware integration and field evaluation; no mathematical models, fitted parameters, axioms, or postulated entities are present.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5795 in / 1134 out tokens · 20958 ms · 2026-06-27T19:38:38.284618+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 32 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Technology, Mind, and Behavior2(1), 1–6 (2021) https://doi.org/ 10.1037/tmb0000030 42

    Bailenson, J.N.: Nonverbal Overload: A Theoretical Argument for the Causes of Zoom Fatigue. Technology, Mind, and Behavior2(1), 1–6 (2021) https://doi.org/ 10.1037/tmb0000030 42

    work page doi:10.1037/tmb0000030 2021

  2. [2]

    In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction

    Beer, J.M., Takayama, L.: Mobile remote presence systems for older adults: accep- tance, benefits, and concerns. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. HRI ’11, pp. 19–26. Association for Comput- ing Machinery, New York, NY, USA (2011). https://doi.org/10.1145/1957656. 1957665

    work page doi:10.1145/1957656 2011

  3. [3]

    Interna- tional Journal of Social Robotics8(3), 421–441 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1007/ s12369-016-0337-z

    Cesta, A., Cortellessa, G., Orlandini, A., Tiberio, L.: Long-term evaluation of a telepresence robot for the elderly: methodology and ecological case study. Interna- tional Journal of Social Robotics8(3), 421–441 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1007/ s12369-016-0337-z

    2016

  4. [4]

    In: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

    Newhart, V.A., Olson, J.S.: My student is a robot: How schools manage telep- resence experiences for students. In: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. CHI ’17, pp. 342–347. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA (2017). https://doi.org/10.1145/ 3025453.3025809

    arXiv 2017

  5. [5]

    In: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction

    Tanaka, F., Takahashi, T., Matsuzoe, S., Tazawa, N., Morita, M.: Telepres- ence robot helps children in communicating with teachers who speak a different language. In: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. HRI ’14, pp. 399–406. Association for Comput- ing Machinery, New York, NY, USA (2014). https://doi.org/...

    work page doi:10.1145/2559636 2014

  6. [6]

    International Journal of Social Robotics14(4), 1025–1042 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-021-00837-y

    Lei, M., Clemente, I.M., Liu, H., Bell, J.: The acceptance of telepresence robots in higher education. International Journal of Social Robotics14(4), 1025–1042 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-021-00837-y

    work page doi:10.1007/s12369-021-00837-y 2022

  7. [7]

    In: Proceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

    Seo, J., Lim, H., Suh, B., Lee, J.: I feel being there, they feel being together: Exploring how telepresence robots facilitate long-distance family communication. In: Proceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. CHI ’24. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA (2024). https://doi.org/10.1145/3613904.3642305

    work page doi:10.1145/3613904.3642305 2024

  8. [8]

    Management science32(5), 554–571 (1986) https://doi

    Daft, R.L., Lengel, R.H.: Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management science32(5), 554–571 (1986) https://doi. org/10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554

    work page doi:10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554 1986

  9. [9]

    In: Resnick, L.B., Levine, J.M., Teasley, S.D

    Clark, H.H., Brennan, S.E.: Grounding in communication. In: Resnick, L.B., Levine, J.M., Teasley, S.D. (eds.) Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition, pp. 127–149. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC (1991). https: //doi.org/10.1037/10096-006

    work page doi:10.1037/10096-006 1991

  10. [10]

    International Journal of Human-Computer Studies77, 23–37 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.ijhcs.2015.01.001 43

    Li, J.: The benefit of being physically present: A survey of experimental works comparing copresent robots, telepresent robots and virtual agents. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies77, 23–37 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.ijhcs.2015.01.001 43

    2015

  11. [11]

    Foundations and Trends in Robotics7(4), 251–356 (2019) https://doi.org/10

    Deng, E., Mutlu, B., Matari´ c, M.J.: Embodiment in socially interactive robots. Foundations and Trends in Robotics7(4), 251–356 (2019) https://doi.org/10. 1561/2300000056

    2019

  12. [12]

    IEEE Transactions on Robotics39(3), 1706–1727 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1109/TRO.2023.3236952

    Darvish, K., Penco, L., Ramos, J., Cisneros, R., Pratt, J., Yoshida, E., Ivaldi, S., Pucci, D.: Teleoperation of humanoid robots: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Robotics39(3), 1706–1727 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1109/TRO.2023.3236952

    work page doi:10.1109/tro.2023.3236952 2023

  13. [13]

    International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction38(17), 1651–1667 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2021.2009673

    Zhang, G., Hansen, J.P.: Telepresence robots for people with special needs: A systematic review. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction38(17), 1651–1667 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2021.2009673

    work page doi:10.1080/10447318.2021.2009673 2022

  14. [14]

    Frontiers in Psychology12(2022) https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.800657

    Sato, W., Namba, S., Yang, D., Nishida, S., Ishi, C., Minato, T.: An android for emotional interaction: Spatiotemporal validation of its facial expressions. Frontiers in Psychology12(2022) https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.800657

    work page doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.800657 2022

  15. [15]

    https://engineeredarts.com/robots/ameca

    Engineered Arts: Ameca: The World’s Most Advanced Social Humanoid Robot. https://engineeredarts.com/robots/ameca. Accessed: Dec. 18, 2025 (2025)

    2025

  16. [16]

    https://www.hansonrobotics.com/sophia/

    Hanson Robotics: Sophia. https://www.hansonrobotics.com/sophia/. Accessed: Dec. 18, 2025 (2025)

    2025

  17. [17]

    In: 2016 25th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), pp

    Glas, D.F., Minato, T., Ishi, C.T., Kawahara, T., Ishiguro, H.: Erica: The erato intelligent conversational android. In: 2016 25th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), pp. 22–29 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2016.7745086

    work page doi:10.1109/roman.2016.7745086 2016

  18. [18]

    In: 2012 12th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids 2012), pp

    Ahn, H.S., Lee, D.-W., Choi, D., Lee, D.-Y., Hur, M., Lee, H.: Designing of android head system by applying facial muscle mechanism of humans. In: 2012 12th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids 2012), pp. 799–804 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1109/HUMANOIDS.2012.6651611

    work page doi:10.1109/humanoids.2012.6651611 2012

  19. [19]

    In: Prabaharan, S.R.S., Thalmann, N.M., Kanchana Bhaaskaran, V.S

    Thalmann, N.M., Tian, L., Yao, F.: Nadine: A social robot that can localize objects and grasp them in a human way. In: Prabaharan, S.R.S., Thalmann, N.M., Kanchana Bhaaskaran, V.S. (eds.) Frontiers in Electronic Technologies, pp. 1–23. Springer, Singapore (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4235-5 1

    work page doi:10.1007/978-981-10-4235-5 2017

  20. [20]

    In: Pina Filho, A.C

    Nishio, S., Ishiguro, H., Hagita, N.: Geminoid: Teleoperated android of an exist- ing person. In: Pina Filho, A.C. (ed.) Humanoid Robots - New Developments. IntechOpen, London (2007). Chap. 20. https://doi.org/10.5772/4876

    work page doi:10.5772/4876 2007

  21. [21]

    In: ACM SIGGRAPH 2011 Emerging Technologies

    Ogawa, K., Nishio, S., Koda, K., Taura, K., Minato, T., Ishii, C.T., Ishiguro, H.: Telenoid: tele-presence android for communication. In: ACM SIGGRAPH 2011 Emerging Technologies. SIGGRAPH ’11. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA (2011). https://doi.org/10.1145/2048259.2048274

    work page doi:10.1145/2048259.2048274 2011

  22. [22]

    In: Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction

    Sakamoto, D., Kanda, T., Ono, T., Ishiguro, H., Hagita, N.: Android as a 44 telecommunication medium with a human-like presence. In: Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. HRI ’07, pp. 193–200. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA (2007). https://doi.org/10.1145/1228716.1228743

    work page doi:10.1145/1228716.1228743 2007

  23. [23]

    International Journal of Humanoid Robotics17(5), 2050019 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1142/S021984362050019X

    Tachi, S., Inoue, Y., Kato, F.: TELESAR VI: Telexistence surrogate anthropo- morphic robot vi. International Journal of Humanoid Robotics17(5), 2050019 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1142/S021984362050019X

    work page doi:10.1142/s021984362050019x 2020

  24. [24]

    Science Robotics9(86), 3834 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1126/scirobotics.adh3834

    Dafarra, S., Pattacini, U., Romualdi, G., Rapetti, L., Grieco, R., Darvish, K., Milani, G., Valli, E., Sorrentino, I., Viceconte, P.M., Scalzo, A., Traversaro, S., Sartore, C., Elobaid, M., Guedelha, N., Herron, C., Leonessa, A., Draicchio, F., Metta, G., Maggiali, M., Pucci, D.: icub3 avatar system: Enabling remote fully immersive embodiment of humanoid ...

    work page doi:10.1126/scirobotics.adh3834 2024

  25. [25]

    International Journal of Social Robotics17(3), 337–361 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1007/ s12369-023-01050-9

    Lenz, C., Schwarz, M., Rochow, A., P¨ atzold, B., Memmesheimer, R., Schreiber, M., Behnke, S.: Nimbro wins ana avatar xprize immersive telepres- ence competition: Human-centric evaluation and lessons learned. International Journal of Social Robotics17(3), 337–361 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1007/ s12369-023-01050-9

    2025

  26. [26]

    International Journal of Social Robotics 17(3), 427–455 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-023-01090-1

    Correia Marques, J.M., Naughton, P., Peng, J.-C., Zhu, Y., Nam, J.S., Kong, Q., Zhang, X., Penmetcha, A., Ji, R., Fu, N.,et al.: Immersive commodity telep- resence with the avatrina robot avatar. International Journal of Social Robotics 17(3), 427–455 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-023-01090-1

    work page doi:10.1007/s12369-023-01090-1 2025

  27. [27]

    Interna- tional Journal of Social Robotics17(3), 505–521 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1007/ s12369-024-01173-7

    Zambella, G., Grioli, G., Cavaliere, A., Rosato, G., Petrocelli, C., Poggiani, M., Barbarossa, M., Lentini, G., Sessa, E., Tincani, V.,et al.: Usability of a robot avatar designed for the real world: The alter-ego x case study. Interna- tional Journal of Social Robotics17(3), 505–521 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1007/ s12369-024-01173-7

    2025

  28. [28]

    International Journal of Social Robotics17(3), 535–562 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-023-01096-9

    Cisneros-Lim´ on, R., Dallard, A., Benallegue, M., Kaneko, K., Kaminaga, H., Gergondet, P., Tanguy, A., Singh, R.P., Sun, L., Chen, Y.,et al.: A cybernetic avatar system to embody human telepresence for connectivity, exploration, and skill transfer. International Journal of Social Robotics17(3), 535–562 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-023-01096-9

    work page doi:10.1007/s12369-023-01096-9 2025

  29. [29]

    In: 2009 9th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, pp

    Kaneko, K., Kanehiro, F., Morisawa, M., Miura, K., Nakaoka, S., Kajita, S.: Cybernetic human hrp-4c. In: 2009 9th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, pp. 7–14 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICHR.2009.5379537

    work page doi:10.1109/ichr.2009.5379537 2009

  30. [30]

    Springer, Singapore (2025)

    Ishiguro, H., Ueno, F., Tachibana, E.: Cybernetic Avatar. Springer, Singapore (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-3752-9

    work page doi:10.1007/978-981-97-3752-9 2025

  31. [31]

    IEEE Access 12, 23930–23942 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3365723

    Nakajima, M., Shinkawa, K., Nakata, Y.: Development of the lifelike head unit 45 for a humanoid cybernetic avatar‘yui’ and its operation interface. IEEE Access 12, 23930–23942 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3365723

    work page doi:10.1109/access.2024.3365723 2024

  32. [32]

    Robotica40(4), 933–950 (2022) https: //doi.org/10.1017/S0263574721000898

    Nakata, Y., Yagi, S., Yu, S., Wang, Y., Ise, N., Nakamura, Y., Ishiguro, H.: Development of‘ibuki’ an electrically actuated childlike android with mobility and its potential in the future society. Robotica40(4), 933–950 (2022) https: //doi.org/10.1017/S0263574721000898

    work page doi:10.1017/s0263574721000898 2022

  33. [33]

    ROBOMECH Journal11(16), 1–20 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1186/s40648-024-00284-0

    Shinkawa, K., Nakajima, M., Nakata, Y.: Vision-sharing system for android avatars to enable remote eye contact. ROBOMECH Journal11(16), 1–20 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1186/s40648-024-00284-0

    work page doi:10.1186/s40648-024-00284-0 2024

  34. [34]

    IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing4(1), 15–33 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1109/T-AFFC.2012.16

    Kleinsmith, A., Bianchi-Berthouze, N.: Affective body expression perception and recognition: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing4(1), 15–33 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1109/T-AFFC.2012.16

    work page doi:10.1109/t-affc.2012.16 2013

  35. [35]

    Admoni, H., Scassellati, B.: Social eye gaze in human-robot interaction: a review. J. Hum.-Robot Interact.6(1), 25–63 (2017) https://doi.org/10.5898/JHRI.6.1. Admoni

    work page doi:10.5898/jhri.6.1 2017

  36. [36]

    In: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction

    V´ azquez, M., Carter, E.J., McDorman, B., Forlizzi, J., Steinfeld, A., Hudson, S.E.: Towards robot autonomy in group conversations: Understanding the effects of body orientation and gaze. In: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. HRI ’17, pp. 42–52. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA (20...

    arXiv 2017

  37. [37]

    In: 9th IEEE International Work- shop on Advanced Motion Control, 2006., pp

    ˇSabanovi´ c, S., Michalowski, M.P., Simmons, R.: Robots in the wild: observing human-robot social interaction outside the lab. In: 9th IEEE International Work- shop on Advanced Motion Control, 2006., pp. 596–601 (2006). https://doi.org/ 10.1109/AMC.2006.1631758

    work page doi:10.1109/amc.2006.1631758 2006

  38. [38]

    https://arxiv.org/abs/1906.08172

    Lugaresi, C., Tang, J., Nash, H., McClanahan, C., Uboweja, E., Hays, M., Zhang, F., Chang, C.-L., Yong, M.G., Lee, J., Chang, W.-T., Hua, W., Georg, M., Grund- mann, M.: MediaPipe: A Framework for Building Perception Pipelines (2019). https://arxiv.org/abs/1906.08172

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  39. [39]

    APA PsycTests (1978)

    Ekman, P., Friesen, W.V.: Facial action coding system. APA PsycTests (1978). https://doi.org/10.1037/t27734-000

    work page doi:10.1037/t27734-000 1978

  40. [40]

    Accessed: 2026-04-

    Future of Life, the Signature Pavilion of ISHIGURO Hiroshi. Accessed: 2026-04-

    2026

  41. [41]

    https://www.expo2025.or.jp/en/expo-archive/project/ishiguro/

  42. [42]

    In: 2019 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Robotics and Its Social Impacts (ARSO), pp

    Umetani, T., Kikuchi, T., Saiwaki, N.: Remote reference-desk service system using android robot for university librarian. In: 2019 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Robotics and Its Social Impacts (ARSO), pp. 25–27 (2019). https: //doi.org/10.1109/ARSO46408.2019.8948796 46

    work page doi:10.1109/arso46408.2019.8948796 2019

  43. [43]

    In: 2025 34th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), pp

    Heisler, M., Becker-Asano, C.: Conversations with andrea: Visitors’ opinions on android robots in a museum. In: 2025 34th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), pp. 112–119 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1109/RO-MAN63969.2025.11217762

    work page doi:10.1109/ro-man63969.2025.11217762 2025

  44. [44]

    In: Collaboration Tech- nologies and Social Computing, pp

    Tanaka, K., Nakanishi, H., Ishiguro, H.: Comparing video, avatar, and robot mediated communication: Pros and cons of embodiment. In: Collaboration Tech- nologies and Social Computing, pp. 96–110 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/ 978-3-662-44651-5 9

    2014

  45. [45]

    In: RO-MAN 2008-The 17th IEEE International Sym- posium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pp

    Bainbridge, W.A., Hart, J., Kim, E.S., Scassellati, B.: The effect of presence on human-robot interaction. In: RO-MAN 2008-The 17th IEEE International Sym- posium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pp. 701–706 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2008.4600749 . IEEE

    work page doi:10.1109/roman.2008.4600749 2008

  46. [46]

    In: International Symposium on Robotics, vol

    Ishiguro, H., Minato, T.: Development of androids for studying on human- robot interaction. In: International Symposium on Robotics, vol. 36, p. 5 (2005). unknown 47

    2005