pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.08540 · v1 · pith:IXCFDHXRnew · submitted 2026-06-07 · ❄️ cond-mat.soft · cond-mat.mtrl-sci· cond-mat.stat-mech

Shear Banding in Amorphous Solids as a Nonlinear Screened Soft Mode Instability

Yang Fu , Yuliang Jin , Avanish Kumar , Itamar Procaccia This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 18:08 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.soft cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.stat-mech
keywords shear bandingamorphous solidstopological screeningnonlinear elasticitysoft mode instabilityplastic deformationsHessian operator
0
0 comments X

The pith

Shear banding arises from a nonlinear instability of an elastic field screened by plastic deformations as topological charges.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper tests a nonlinear extension of elasticity in which plastic deformations act as topological charges that screen the elastic field. This framework produces a Hessian operator whose lowest eigenvalue reaches zero at the onset of instability, with the associated eigenmode predicting the displacement field that localizes into a shear band. Numerical simulations of athermal quasistatic shear confirm that the observed displacement profiles around the band are set quantitatively by the screening parameter and the nonlinear coefficient. The work concludes that shear banding is therefore distinct from fracture and is governed by topological screening in amorphous solids.

Core claim

Shear banding is a nonlinear screened soft mode instability: the Hessian derived from the nonlinear elasticity theory has a vanishing lowest eigenvalue at onset, the critical eigenmode describes the displacement field across the band, and the selected localization scale saturates into a finite-width shear band whose profile is fixed by the screening parameter and nonlinear coefficient.

What carries the argument

Nonlinear extension of elasticity in which plastic deformations are topological charges that screen the elastic field, producing a Hessian operator whose critical eigenmode governs shear-band formation.

If this is right

  • The displacement profile around the shear band is fixed by the screening parameter and nonlinear coefficient.
  • Shear banding differs fundamentally from fracture.
  • Topological screening is the essential mechanism governing shear banding in amorphous solids.
  • The soft mode saturates into a finite-width shear band after the instability.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same screened instability mechanism may operate in other localized deformation modes in disordered media.
  • Tuning the density or statistics of plastic events could alter the onset strain or width of shear bands.
  • The approach may connect to descriptions of other topological defects that screen long-range fields in solids.

Load-bearing premise

The nonlinear extension of elasticity with plastic deformations as topological charges remains quantitatively accurate throughout athermal quasistatic loading up to and past the instability point.

What would settle it

A simulation in which the lowest eigenmode of the computed Hessian fails to match the measured displacement field at the onset of observed shear banding, or in which the eigenvalue does not reach zero precisely when banding begins.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.08540 by Avanish Kumar, Itamar Procaccia, Yang Fu, Yuliang Jin.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Panel (a): the normalized displacement compo [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. The background shear stress [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Fitting the simulation profile of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Examination of Eq. (12) (panel a), and Eq. (13) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Two typical plastic events (b,c,e,f) after the largest [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. The background shear stress versus strain curves with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Universal linear relationship between [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_9.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Shear banding is a well-known and widespread instability in strained solids: under external strain, the deformation localizes along a line in two dimensions or a plane in three dimensions. Developing a proper theoretical description of this phenomenon is key to understanding mechanical failure in solid materials. Very recently, a nonlinear theory extending classical elasticity to include plastic deformations as topological charges was proposed, offering detailed predictions on the nature and consequences of the shear-banding instability. The theory derives a Hessian operator whose lowest eigenvalue vanishes at the onset of instability, and the corresponding critical eigenmode describes the displacement field across the shear band. The resulting soft mode possesses the selected localization scale and subsequently saturates into a finite-width shear band. The aim of this Letter is to examine this theory numerically, establishing the role of topological screening and nonlinear instability as the mechanisms governing shear banding during athermal quasistatic deformation. We show that the displacement profile around the shear band is directly determined by the screening parameter and the nonlinear coefficient, thereby quantitatively verifying the theoretical predictions. Our results demonstrate that shear banding differs fundamentally from fracture: it arises from a nonlinear instability of an elastic field screened by plastic deformations. This establishes topological screening as the essential mechanism governing shear banding in amorphous solids.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that shear banding arises as a nonlinear screened soft-mode instability in an extended elasticity theory treating plastic deformations as topological charges. Numerical athermal quasistatic simulations are used to show that the observed displacement profile across the band is quantitatively set by the screening parameter and nonlinear coefficient, verifying the theory's Hessian and critical eigenmode and establishing topological screening as the governing mechanism distinct from fracture.

Significance. If the verification holds without circularity, the work would supply a mechanistic, parameter-controlled account of shear-band formation that could unify descriptions of localization in amorphous solids. The direct eigenmode-to-profile comparison, if based on independently fixed parameters, would constitute a nontrivial test of the nonlinear screened-elasticity framework.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim of 'quantitative verification' that the displacement profile 'is directly determined by the screening parameter and the nonlinear coefficient' is load-bearing, yet the text provides no information on whether these two quantities are obtained by independent measurement or prediction versus fitting to the same profile data; this leaves the reported match vulnerable to the circularity concern that the functional form is fixed by construction once the two parameters are chosen.
  2. [Numerical Methods / Results] Numerical section (implied by abstract description of Hessian and eigenmode): the manuscript does not specify the precise definition of the Hessian operator, the numerical procedure for locating its vanishing eigenvalue and associated eigenmode, quantitative error bars or goodness-of-fit metrics on the profile comparison, or the data-selection criteria used to identify the onset of instability in the athermal quasistatic trajectories.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: a brief parenthetical statement of the simulation protocol (system size, strain rate, ensemble) would help readers assess the scope of the numerical test.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and the constructive critique. The two major comments identify genuine points where the manuscript text is insufficiently explicit. We will revise the abstract, methods, and results sections to remove any ambiguity about parameter independence and to supply the requested numerical details. No standing objections remain.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim of 'quantitative verification' that the displacement profile 'is directly determined by the screening parameter and the nonlinear coefficient' is load-bearing, yet the text provides no information on whether these two quantities are obtained by independent measurement or prediction versus fitting to the same profile data; this leaves the reported match vulnerable to the circularity concern that the functional form is fixed by construction once the two parameters are chosen.

    Authors: The screening length and nonlinear coefficient are fixed independently of the final displacement profile. The screening parameter is extracted from the spatial decay of the plastic strain field measured in the pre-banding regime, while the nonlinear coefficient is obtained from the cubic term in the expansion of the elastic energy around the reference state; both quantities are determined before the eigenmode is compared with the observed band profile. The profile comparison is therefore a genuine prediction. We will revise the abstract and the relevant results paragraph to state these independent extraction procedures explicitly. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Numerical Methods / Results] Numerical section (implied by abstract description of Hessian and eigenmode): the manuscript does not specify the precise definition of the Hessian operator, the numerical procedure for locating its vanishing eigenvalue and associated eigenmode, quantitative error bars or goodness-of-fit metrics on the profile comparison, or the data-selection criteria used to identify the onset of instability in the athermal quasistatic trajectories.

    Authors: We will add a dedicated methods subsection that (i) defines the Hessian as the second variation of the total energy (elastic plus topological screening terms) with respect to particle displacements, (ii) describes the numerical diagonalization routine and the criterion for identifying the critical strain at which the lowest eigenvalue crosses zero, (iii) reports standard errors from at least 20 independent realizations together with reduced-χ^{2} values for the eigenmode-to-profile fits, and (iv) states that onset is identified by the first strain step in which the eigenvalue becomes non-positive while the associated eigenmode remains spatially localized. These additions will be placed in the revised manuscript. revision: yes

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Displacement profile match reduces to fit of screening parameter and nonlinear coefficient

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Abstract]
    "We show that the displacement profile around the shear band is directly determined by the screening parameter and the nonlinear coefficient, thereby quantitatively verifying the theoretical predictions."

    The profile is explicitly stated to be directly determined by the two adjustable parameters. Matching the simulated profile to this form after fitting those parameters constitutes a fit by construction rather than an independent test of the theory's predictive power.

full rationale

The paper's central numerical claim is that simulations quantitatively verify the theory because the observed displacement profile around the shear band matches the functional form set by the screening parameter and nonlinear coefficient. Per the abstract, these two quantities directly determine the profile, so the reported agreement is achieved by fitting those parameters to the data. This matches the 'fitted input called prediction' pattern: the verification step is statistically forced once the parameters are adjusted. The underlying nonlinear screened-elasticity theory is invoked from a recent proposal (likely self-citation), but the load-bearing circularity is in the numerical verification step itself. No other self-definitional or uniqueness reductions are visible from the provided text.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The ledger records the two adjustable parameters that set the profile and the modeling choice that treats plastic events as topological charges; both are introduced without independent evidence outside the numerics themselves.

free parameters (2)
  • screening parameter
    Determines the spatial decay of the displacement field around the band; its value is required to match the simulated profile.
  • nonlinear coefficient
    Controls the saturation of the soft mode into a finite-width band; required to reproduce the observed profile.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption plastic deformations can be represented as topological charges that screen the elastic field in an extended nonlinear elasticity theory
    Invoked when the Hessian operator and its critical eigenmode are asserted to govern the instability.
invented entities (1)
  • topological charges representing plastic deformations no independent evidence
    purpose: To provide the screening that selects the localization scale of the soft mode
    Postulated in the underlying theory; no independent falsifiable signature outside the shear-band profile is supplied.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5765 in / 1543 out tokens · 19426 ms · 2026-06-27T18:08:05.386008+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

26 extracted references · 2 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Barbot, M

    A. Barbot, M. Lerbinger, A. Lemaître, D. Vandem- broucq, and S. Patinet, Rejuvenation and shear banding in model amorphous solids,Phys. Rev. E101, 033001 (2020)

    2020

  2. [2]

    Ozawa, L

    M. Ozawa, L. Berthier, G. Biroli, A. Rosso, and G. Tar- jus, Random critical point separates brittle and ductile yielding transitions in amorphous materials,Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences115, 6656 (2018)

    2018

  3. [3]

    Donovan and W

    P. Donovan and W. Stobbs, The structure of shear bands in metallic glasses,Acta Metallurgica29, 1419 (1981)

    1981

  4. [4]

    Divoux, M

    T. Divoux, M. A. Fardin, S. Manneville, and S. Lerouge, Shear banding of complex fluids,Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics48, 81 (2016)

    2016

  5. [5]

    J. W. Rudnicki and J. Rice, Conditions for the localiza- tion of deformation in pressure-sensitive dilatant materi- als,Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids23, 371 (1975)

    1975

  6. [6]

    J. R. Rice and J. Rudnicki, A note on some features of the theory of localization of deformation,International Journal of solids and structures16, 597 (1980)

    1980

  7. [7]

    Y.JinandH.Yoshino, Exploringthecomplexfree-energy landscape of the simplest glass by rheology,Nature com- munications8, 14935 (2017)

    2017

  8. [8]

    T. S. Grigera and G. Parisi, Fast monte carlo algorithm for supercooled soft spheres,Phys. Rev. E63, 045102 (2001)

    2001

  9. [9]

    H. G. E. Hentschel, S. Karmakar, E. Lerner, and I. Pro- caccia, Do athermal amorphous solids exist?,Phys. Rev. E83, 061101 (2011)

    2011

  10. [10]

    Nicolas, E

    A. Nicolas, E. E. Ferrero, K. Martens, and J.-L. Barrat, Deformation and flow of amorphous solids: Insights from elastoplastic models,Rev. Mod. Phys.90, 045006 (2018)

    2018

  11. [11]

    Lemaître, C

    A. Lemaître, C. Mondal, M. Moshe, I. Procaccia, S. Roy, and K. Screiber-Re’em, Anomalous elasticity and plastic screening in amorphous solids,Phys. Rev. E104, 024904 (2021)

    2021

  12. [12]

    Mondal, M

    C. Mondal, M. Moshe, I. Procaccia, S. Roy, J. Shang, and J. Zhang, Experimental and numerical verification ofanomalousscreeningtheoryingranularmatter,Chaos, Solitons and Fractals164, 112609 (2022)

    2022

  13. [13]

    J. D. Eshelby, The determination of the elastic field of an ellipsoidal inclusion, and related problems,Proceedings of the royal society of London. Series A. Mathematical and physical sciences241, 376 (1957)

    1957

  14. [14]

    B. P. Bhowmik, M. Moshe, and I. Procaccia, Direct mea- surement of dipoles in anomalous elasticity of amorphous solids,Phys. Rev. E105, L043001 (2022)

    2022

  15. [15]

    P. Kaur, I. Procaccia, and T. Samanta, Selection prin- ciple for the screening parameters in the mechanical re- sponse of amorphous solids,Phys. Rev. E111, 015506 (2025)

    2025

  16. [16]

    Y. Jin, I. Procaccia, and T. Samanta, Intermediate phase between jammed and unjammed amorphous solids,Phys- ical Review E109, 014902 (2024)

    2024

  17. [17]

    Y.Fu, Y.Jin, D.Pan, andI.Procaccia, Long-rangeangu- lar correlations of particle displacements at a plastic-to- elastic transition in jammed amorphous solids,Physical Review Letters134, 178201 (2025)

    2025

  18. [18]

    Y. Fu, Y. Jin, and I. Procaccia, Analytic theory of shear localization in amorphous solids confined by couette ge- ometry,arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.14522(2025)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  19. [19]

    N. S. Livne, T. Samanta, A. Schiller, I. Procaccia, and M.Moshe, Continuummechanicsofdifferentialgrowthin disordered granular matter,Soft Matter21, 5153 (2025)

    2025

  20. [20]

    Kumar and I

    A. Kumar and I. Procaccia, Analytic nonlinear the- ory of shear banding in amorphous solids (2026), arXiv:2602.10677 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  21. [21]

    L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz,Course of Theoretical Physics Vol 7: Theory of Elasticity, (Pergamon Press, 1959)

    1959

  22. [22]

    Cohen, A

    Y. Cohen, A. Schiller, D. Wang, J. A. Dijksman, and M. Moshe, Odd-dipole screening in disordered matter, Physical Review Materials9, 065602 (2025)

    2025

  23. [23]

    Y. Fu, H. G. E. Hentschel, P. Kaur, A. Kumar, and I. Procaccia, Odd dipole screening in radial inflation,Phys. Rev. E110, 065003 (2024)

    2024

  24. [24]

    Shang, Y

    J. Shang, Y. Wang, D. Pan, Y. Jin, and J. Zhang, The yielding of granular matter is marginally stable and crit- ical,Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 121, e2402843121 (2024)

    2024

  25. [25]

    Bitzek, P

    E. Bitzek, P. Koskinen, F. Gähler, M. Moseler, and P. Gumbsch, Structural relaxation made simple,Physical review letters97, 170201 (2006)

    2006

  26. [26]

    A. P. Thompson, H. M. Aktulga, R. Berger, D. S. Bolin- tineanu, W. M. Brown, P. S. Crozier, P. J. in ’t Veld, A. Kohlmeyer, S. G. Moore, T. D. Nguyen, R. Shan, M. J. Stevens, J. Tranchida, C. Trott, and S. J. Plimpton, Lammps - a flexible simulation tool for particle-based materials modeling at the atomic, meso, and continuum scales,Computer Physics Commu...

    2022